| dc.contributor.advisor | 姜堯民 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chiang, Yao-Min | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 游為仰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Yu, Wei-Yang | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 游為仰 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Yu, Wei-Yang | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2007 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 23-Apr-2010 19:24:30 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 23-Apr-2010 19:24:30 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 23-Apr-2010 19:24:30 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0096357004 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38931 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 財務管理研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 96357004 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 96 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 台灣自民國五十一年至九十七年期間歷經了七次的承銷制度改革，配售方式由原先的公開抽籤，歷經競價拍賣與公開抽籤並行，一直到民國九十三年，市場旋以詢價圈購為主流。本文除整理台灣承銷市場於此段時期的制度沿革外，並探究民國八十年至九十七年間，三種制度的施行是否直接地造成期初異常報酬的差異。 透過實證研究發現，初次上市上櫃公司選擇不同的承銷配售方式確實對期初報酬的影響程度確有著顯著的不同，而三種方式的期初報酬以詢價圈購為最高，公開申購次之，競價拍賣為價格發現能力最好的承銷配售方式，其結果與國外文獻相同。但對於制度改革而言，與期初報酬並沒有直接關連性。如民國八十四年就已開放詢價圈購方式，但由於其相關承銷規定背離市場習慣，導致此方式乏人問津，直至民國九十三年做更進一步的放寬限制，方才改變市場的承銷配售方式，由此可知法令變革的宣告並無法直接影響期初價格，而是待法令改革之後，實際落實於市場方會改變市場期初報酬的現象。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | There are seven main reforms of initial public offering methods in Taiwan during 1962 to 2008. From the fixed price method transform to auction, and in 2004 the bookbuilding became the mainstream in the IPO market. In this thesis we not only compile the reform processes in IPO methods in Taiwan capital market but also study the relationship between the initial returns and the IPO methods during 1991 to 2008. Through the empirical studies, there are significant differences between the initial returns and three IPO methods. The auction owns the highest initial return and bookbuilding own the best price discovering mechanism. However the reform announcements could not affect the initial returns directly. The bookbuilding method is allowed in 1995 but due to deviating from custom, no firms applied it in the IPO until the further reform in 2004. The simple reform announcement could not affect the initial returns directly. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 6 第一節 研究背景與動機 6 第二節 研究目的 8 第三節 研究流程與架構 9 第二章 文獻探討 11 第一節 我國承銷制度沿革介紹 11 第二節 期初報酬文獻探討 36 第三節 承銷制度對於期初報酬的影響之文獻回顧 39 第三章 研究方法與設計 42 第一節 樣本選擇與資料來源 42 第二節 研究方法 44 第四章 實證結果 54 第一節 敘述統計分析 54 第二節 迴歸模式結果分析 58 第五章 結論 64 參考文獻 65 表目錄 表1台灣承銷配售制度歷史沿革 7 表2台灣上市上櫃公司平均期初報酬與承銷方式表(民國80~97年) 43 表3各項變數之敘述統計 55 表4採用公開申購公司之敘述統計量 55 表5採用競價拍賣公司之敘述統計量 56 表6採用詢價圈購公司之敘述統計量 56 表7上市上櫃公司採不同配售方式之比重 57 表8電子業配售方式之比重 57 表9電子業所占初次上市上櫃公司之比重 57 表10各變數簡單迴歸分析與預期符號 59 表11 三組承銷方式期初報酬ANOVA表 59 表12 期初報酬之多元迴歸分析結果 60 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096357004 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 期初報酬 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | initial return | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | IPO | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 台灣承銷配售制度與股市期初報酬相關性之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | The studies on the relationship between initial returns and the underwriting allocation methods in Taiwan | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中文文獻 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. 黃筱真(2000)，新上市公司股價是否過度反應及上市價差與財務體質關係之研究，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. 楊家溱(2000)，新上市股票超額報酬探討與不同承銷配售方式之選擇，國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3. 顏美英(1992)，承銷商聲望與新上市股票超額報酬關係之實證研究，國立臺灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4. 黃蘭霙，2004，我國證券承銷制度的演進與沿革，證券暨期貨月刊，第22卷第5期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5. 黃蘭霙，2005，承銷新制對資本市場的影響，證券暨期貨月刊，第23卷第6期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6. 劉玉珍、陳薇如，2004，為何詢價圈購方式逐漸取代競價拍賣，證券暨期貨月刊，第23卷第5期 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 英文文獻 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7. Affleck-Graves, J., S. P. Hegde, R. E. Miller, and F. K. Reilly. “The Effect of the Trading System on the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings.” Financial Management (1993), 99-108. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8. Beatty, R. P. and J. R. Ritter, “Investment Banking Reputation, and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings”, Journal of Financial Economics, 15, pp.213-232, 1986 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9. Benveniste, L. M. and W. Y. Busaba, “Bookbuilding vs. Fixed Price: An Analysis of Competing Strategies for Marketing IPOs”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 32, No.4, December 1997 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 10. Benveniste, L. M. and P. A. Spindt, “How Investment Bankers Determine the Offer Price and Allocation of New Issues”, Journal of Financial Economics, 24, pp.343-361, 1989 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 11. Bradley, Daniel and Brad Jordan (2001) “Partial adjustment to public information and IPO underpricing,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis forthcoming. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 12. Busaba, Walid and Chun Chang, (2006), “Bookbuilding vs. Fixed Price Revisited: The Effect of Aftermarket Trading,” Working Paper. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 13. Carter, R. and S. Manaster, “Initial Public Offerings and Underwriter Reputation”, Journal of Finance, 45, pp.1045-1067, Sep. 1990 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 14. Degeorge, Francois, Francois Derrien and Kent L. Womack (2007): “Analyst Hype in IPOs: Explaining the Popularity of Bookbuilding.” Review of Financial Studies 20(4):1021-1058 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 15. Derrien, Francois, and Kent L. Womack (2003) “Auctions vs. bookbuilding and the control ofunderpricing in hot IPO markets,” Review of Financial Studies 16, 31-61. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 16. Hanley, K.W., (1993) “The underpricing of initial public offerings and partial adjustment phenomenon”, Journal of Financial Economics, 34,2,(October) pp.231-251, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 17. Kaneko, Takashi, and Richard H. Pettway (2003) “Auctions versus book-building of Japanese IPOs”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 11, 439–462. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 18. Kutsuna, Kenji and Richard Smith. “Why Does Book Building Drive Out Auction Methods of IPO Issuance? Evidence from Japan.” Review of Financial Studies 17, no.4 (2004): 1129-1166 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 19. Jagannathan, Ravi, and Anne E. Sherman, 2006, “Why do IPO auctions fail?” NBER Working paper 12151. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 20. Louge, D.(1973), “On the Pricing of Unseasoned Equity Issues 1965-1969 .”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 8：91-103 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 21. Loughran and Ritter, 2002, “Why don`t issuers get upset about leaving money on the table in IPOs?”, The Review of Financial Studies 15, 413-443 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 22. Pandey Ajay, (2005), “Initial Returns, Long Run Performance and Characteristics of Issuers: Differences in Indian IPOs Following Fixed Price and Book building Processes” IIMA Working Papers 2005-01-07, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 23. Pukthuanthong, Kuntara, Nikhil P. Varaiya and Thomas J. Walker (2006): “Book Building versus Auction Selling Methods: A Study of U.S. IPOs”, San Diego State University Working Paper | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 24. Ritter, Jay R. (1991), “The Long Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 42, pp. 365-394 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 25. Rock, K. “Why New Issues Are Underpriced?”, Journal of Financial Economics, 15, pp.187-212, 1986 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 26. Sherman, A.E., 2000, “IPOs and Long Term Relationships: An Advantage of Bookbuilding”, Review of Financial Studies 13, 697-714. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 27. Sherman, A.E., (2005) “Global trends in IPO methods: book building versus auctions with endogenous entry”, Journal of Financial Economics 78, pp. 615–649 | zh_TW |
