桃園縣國中教師對校長教學領導行為知覺之研究

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google Scholar^TM

政大圖書館

學術資源探索系統

Citation Infomation

No doi shows Citation Infomation

Simple Record
Full Record

題名	桃園縣國中教師對校長教學領導行為知覺之研究
作者	蔡呈譽
貢獻者	邱錦昌蔡呈譽
關鍵詞	校長教學領導教學領導行為知覺
日期	2002
上傳時間	25-Apr-2010 14:35:55 (UTC+8)
摘要	本研究旨在探討桃園縣國民中學教師所期望的校長教學領導行為和所知覺到的校長教學領導實際行為，藉由文獻分析、問卷調查、半結構式訪談等方法，探討教師背景變項、學校背景變項的教師對校長教學領導行為之知覺差異情形。調查對象以桃園縣公立之國民中學教師為母群體，抽取723位教師（包括教師兼之主任與組長）做樣本，以自編『國民中學校長教學領導行為調查問卷』進行問卷調查，有效問卷隨即進行編碼、記分，然後輸入電腦建立資料檔，再以SPSS 10.0 for Windows 套裝軟体進行各項統計考驗。為彌補問卷調查之不足，抽取桃園縣具代表性的六位校長以自編『國民中學校長教學領導行為訪談題目』進行訪談，經錄音、編碼、整理後進行分析。本研究所獲得之主要結論如下：壹、桃園縣國中教師所知覺到校長教學領導行為的理想面與實踐面有明顯差異，理想面明顯大於實踐面貳、桃園縣國民中學教師對於校長教學領導在理想面的知覺度很高，其中以營造支持環境向度居七個層面之首，而以確保課程品質為最低參、桃園縣國民中學教師對於校長教學領導在實踐程度方面的知覺度屬中上程度，以營造支持環境層面居七個層面之首，而以激勵教師合作與互動最低肆、桃園縣國民中學教師在校長教學七個層面上的知覺，不管是理想面或實踐面，皆以營造支持環境為最高，且在校長訪談中亦以營造支持環境最為校長重視，此結果充分顯示校長與教師對校長教學領導的看法相當一致伍、桃園縣國中教師對校長教學領導的理想面，在男女性別教師變項、年資變項、擔任職務變項、學校所在地變項、設校時間變項並無差異。桃園縣國中教師對校長教學領導的實踐面，在年資變項、學校所在地變項、設校時間變項皆無明顯差異陸、桃園縣國中教師對校長教學領導在實踐面的性別變項上的知覺顯示有差異，男性教師比女性教師認為校長更有從事教學領導行為柒、桃園縣國民中學一般教師與兼行政教師對校長教學領導在實踐面有明顯差異，兼行政之教師比一般教師認為校長在教學領導的實踐程度上較高捌、桃園縣國中教師對校長教學領導在學校規模變項，不管理想面或實踐面的知覺度都以24班以下為最高依據研究結論，本研究提出以下建議：壹、對教育主管機關之建議一、加強充實校長教學領導的理念二、師資與校長培訓中加入教學領導的課程三、適時縮小學校規模四、校長評鑑時應重視教學領導項目貳、對國民中學校長的建議一、充實教學領導知能，積極扮演教學領導角色二、建立教學領導團隊，引導教師合作與互動三、推行教學領時應積極營造良好的學校文化四、校長應致力於確保課程品五、加強各領域教學研究會功能參、對未來研究的建議未來研究對象可進一步擴大地區範圍，研究變項應該加入教師學歷變項學區家長變項及學校效能，學生學習成就等相關變項，為了更能瞭解校長教學領導行為，未來的研究宜加入實際觀察、個案研究等方式。 The purpose of this study was surveying the principals’ instructional leadership behaviors expected and perceived by the junior high school teachers in Taoyuan County. The study explored the differences in the sense of the principal’s instructional leadership behaviors perceived by the teachers in teacher background and school background variables. The study took Taoyuan County’s public junior high school teachers as population from which 723 teachers (including teachers as part-time directors and chiefs) were randomly sampled. The effective questionnaires are then encoded, scored and stored, finally analyzed by SPSS 10.0. To supplement the questionnaire survey, the study also conducts in-depth interviews with six principals among all public junior high schools in Taoyuan County with the “the Junior High School Principal’s Instructional Leadership Behaviors” developed by the author. The conclusions and implications of the present study are summarized below: 1. Significant differences are found between what expected and what actually realized in the principal’s instructional leadership behaviors. What expected are higher than what realized. 2. The teachers have a high perception on the expectation of principal’s instructional leadership. Among the seven major aspects of instructional leadership, Supportive Environment Creation ranks as top priority and Course Quality Assurance as the last. 3. The realization aspect of the principal’s instructional leadership behaviors perceived by the teachers was above average. Among the seven major aspects of principals’ instructional leadership, The dimension of supportive environment creation ranked as top priority and the encouraging teachers’ cooperation and interactions as the last. 4. Among the seven instructional leadership aspects of the principal perceived by the teachers, The demension of supportive environment creation ranked as top one both in expectation and realization and this aspect is also most valued by all principals interviewed. This result demonstrates a high consistency between the principals and teachers on the view of the principal’s instructional leadership. 5. The teachers’ perception of expectation to principal’s instructional leadership in variables including teacher’s sex, service term, position, school location, school founding time shows no difference. The degree of realization of the principal’s instructional behaviors perceived by the teachers shows no significant difference in variables including service term, school location and school founding time. 6. The male teachers’ perception of realization of principal’s instructional leadership was significantly higher than female teachers’ in sex variable. 7. The average teachers perceived a high degree of realization in the principal’s instructional leadership behaviors than the teachers as part-time administrators did. 8. The teachers’ perception of both expectation and realization of principal’s instructional leadership in school scale implies that the highest score of both arises in a school consisting of maximum 24 classes. And then there are some suggestions presenting by this study as follow: 1. Suggestions to the education authorities: (1) Promote and reinforce the concept of principal’s instructional leadership. (2) Enrich the teacher and principal training programs with Instructional Leadership Courses. (3) Downsize the school scale in time (4) Value the instructional leadership areas during evaluating principals. 2. Suggestions to junior high school principals: (1) Advance in instructional leadership knowledge and actively play the role in instructional leadership. (2) Form Instructional Leadership Teams to lead teachers to optimal cooperation and interactions. (3) Shape the school with excellent school culture actively while launching and implementing instructional leadership. (4) Devote to course quality assurance. (5) Enhance the research society’s functions 3. Suggestions to future researches : It is advisable to expand in regional scope in future study and to expand the study variables that include variables such as Teacher’s Diploma, School District & Parents, School Performance, Student’s Academic Achievements, etc.; further, to better understand the principal’s instructional leadership behaviors, it is advisable to use methods such as Actual Observation, Case Study, etc.
參考文獻	壹、中文部分王仁宏（民80）。歷年教育人員甄試詳解。台北：旭昇圖書。江文雄（民90）。校長的職責。載於吳清基主編：學校行政新論。台北：師大書苑。行政院教育改革審議委員會（民85）。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北：行政院教育改革審議委員會。李玉林(民90)。桃園縣國小校長教學領導角色知覺與實踐之研究。國立台北師範學院。國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。李安明(民88)。「為教學而行政」的校長教學領導：理論與實務。教育政策論壇，2（2），158-203。李安明(民86)。我國國小校長教學領導之研究。行政院國科會專題研究計劃成果報告，計劃編號NSC 86-2413-H-134-006。李新寶（民90）。國民小學校長教學領導行為與交師教學效能之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所學校行政碩士班碩士論文，未出版。邱錦昌(民80)。教育視導之理論與實際。台北：五南。邱錦昌(民77)。台灣地區國民中學教學視導工作之研究。國立政治大學博士論文，未出版。呂木琳(民87)。教學視導一理論與實務。台北：五南。吳清山（民90）。中小學實施校長評鑑的挑戰課題與因應策略。教育研究月刊。84。28-36. 陳美言(民87)。國民小學校長教學領導與教師教學自我效能關係之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。陳義明（民81）。學校行政領導－辦學理念與實務。台中：台灣省立台中第二高級中學。黃昆輝(民61)。視導工作的新趨勢。師友月刊，65，8-12。張弘勳（民86）。國民中小學實施學校本位管理之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。張振成（民87）。校長之角色與作為。中等教育，49(4)，7-11。張清濱（民77）。學校行政。台北：台灣書店。張碧娟(民91)。校長教學領導之角色觀點。載於張銀富主編：學校行政理論與應用254-256頁。台北：五南。張碧娟(民88)。國民中學校長教學領導，學校教學領導，學校教學氣氛與教師教學效能之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版。張德銳(民84)。教育行政研究。台北：五南圖書出版公司。張慈娟(民86)。國民小學校長教學領導與學校效能之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。雷國鼎(民58)。教育行政(台十版)。台北：正中。趙廣林(民85)。國民小學校長教學領導之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。楊百世(民78)。國民小學校長教學視導之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學，高雄。楊振昇(民86)。教學領導理念之探討。國立台灣師範大學。學校教育革新專輯，236-263。楊振昇(民88)。我國國小校長從事教學領導概況、困境及其因應策略分析研究。暨大學報，３（１），183-236。魯先華(民83)。國民中學校長教學領導之研究。國立台灣師範大教櫭研究所碩士論文，未出版。劉真(民59)。教育行政。台北：正中。鄭進丁(民75)。國民小學校長角色之分析。高雄：復文。歐曉玟(民90)。彰化縣國民小學校長教學領導之研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所學校行政碩士論文，未出版蔡秀媛(民87)。國民小學校長教學領導及其影響因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。謝文全(民78)。教育行政。台北：文景。貳、英文部分 Drake﹐L.﹐& Roe W. H.（1986）.The principalship. New York﹕Macmillan. Doyle, M. E. & Rice, D.M.（2002）. Principal leadership. H igh Education﹐3（3）﹐49-52. Dwyer,D.C(1986).Understanding the principals’contribution to instruction .Peabody Journal of Educational Digest , 63(1) ,17-20. Eheng, H.Y. (1996) School contexts, principal characterietics , and instructienal eqqectiueness：A statistics analysis .Paper preented at the Amnual Meeting of the American Educational Reseasch Association . (ERIC Document Reproduction Sewice Vo.ED396408). Gewertz﹐C.（2003）.N.Y.C.Chancellor aims to bolster instructional leadership Education Week﹐22（16）﹐7-10. Griffin, M. S.(1993). Instructional leadership behaviors of Catholic secondary school principals.[ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT9327348. Hallinger, P. & Murphy,J.F（1987）.Instructional leadership in the school context. In Greenfield W.（Eds.）﹐Instructional Leadership﹕Concepts，issues﹐and controversies ﹐（pp.179-203）. Hurley, J. (1990). The organizational socialization of high school principals：A description and analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED320281 ) Keefe,J.W., & Jenkins, J. M.(1984).Instructional leadership handbook. Virginia: NASSP. Kesler, M. A. (1988). Pereeptions of Arizona elementary principals toward instructional leadership. [ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item： AAT8907813. Krajewski, R. J. (1978) . Secondary principals want to be instructional leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, 60 (1), 65. Leithwood, K. A.(1992). Transformational leadership : Where does it stand? Educational Digest, 58 (3) , 17-20 Leitner, D , (1988). Principal instructional management behavior and school effectiveness: An organization perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED302934） Mahmood, H. B. (1990). A study of principals perceptions of their competency needs in instructional leadership.(CD-ROM). Abstract from:ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts team:AAC9001589. Manasse, A. L. (1984).Principals as leaders of high-performing systems. Educational Leadership, 41(5), 42-46. Murphy﹐J.（1990）. Principal instruction leadership：in Turston, P. W. & Lotto L. S （Eds）. Avances in educational administration﹐Volume 1﹐Part B﹕Changing perspectives on the school﹐（163-200）.Greenwich﹐Conn.﹕JAI Press. Myers, M. D. (1992). Effective schools and the superintendency：Perception and practice. Contemporary Education, 63 (2) , 96-101. Peterson K. D. (1987). Administrative control and instructionoal leadership: Concepts, issues, and controversies (139-152). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Reitzug, U.C.(1997).Images of principal instructional leadership: From supervision to collaborative inquiry. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision ,12(4) ,324-343. Schoch, A. P. (1992). The relationship between instructional leadership behavior, school effectiveness, school size, gender, race, and years of principalship experience in elementary schools in South Carolina. [ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT9307987. Scott, M. A. (1988). The perceptions of elementary principals and teachers on selected instructional leadership practices in the Farifax Countary Public Schools (Virginia).[ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT8815579. Stroud, D. J. (1989). Factors influencing the instructional leadership behaviors of elementary school principals and the relationship to student achievement.[ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT9017489. Wallker, D. T. (1993). The influence of the superintendent on principal instructional leadership.[ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT9315960. Weber, J. R. (1987). Instructional leadership: Contexts and challenges.(Report No. MF01/pc02) Eugene, Or: Oregon School Study Council. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 288261) Zheng, H. Y. (1996). School contexts, principal characteristics , and instructional leadership effectiveness：A statistical analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED396408). 壹、中文部分王仁宏（民80）。歷年教育人員甄試詳解。台北：旭昇圖書。江文雄（民90）。校長的職責。載於吳清基主編：學校行政新論。台北：師大書苑。行政院教育改革審議委員會（民85）。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北：行政院教育改革審議委員會。李玉林(民90)。桃園縣國小校長教學領導角色知覺與實踐之研究。國立台北師範學院。國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。李安明(民88)。「為教學而行政」的校長教學領導：理論與實務。教育政策論壇，2（2），158-203。李安明(民86)。我國國小校長教學領導之研究。行政院國科會專題研究計劃成果報告，計劃編號NSC 86-2413-H-134-006。李新寶（民90）。國民小學校長教學領導行為與交師教學效能之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所學校行政碩士班碩士論文，未出版。邱錦昌(民80)。教育視導之理論與實際。台北：五南。邱錦昌(民77)。台灣地區國民中學教學視導工作之研究。國立政治大學博士論文，未出版。呂木琳(民87)。教學視導一理論與實務。台北：五南。吳清山（民90）。中小學實施校長評鑑的挑戰課題與因應策略。教育研究月刊。84。28-36. 陳美言(民87)。國民小學校長教學領導與教師教學自我效能關係之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。陳義明（民81）。學校行政領導－辦學理念與實務。台中：台灣省立台中第二高級中學。黃昆輝(民61)。視導工作的新趨勢。師友月刊，65，8-12。張弘勳（民86）。國民中小學實施學校本位管理之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。張振成（民87）。校長之角色與作為。中等教育，49(4)，7-11。張清濱（民77）。學校行政。台北：台灣書店。張碧娟(民91)。校長教學領導之角色觀點。載於張銀富主編：學校行政理論與應用254-256頁。台北：五南。張碧娟(民88)。國民中學校長教學領導，學校教學領導，學校教學氣氛與教師教學效能之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版。張德銳(民84)。教育行政研究。台北：五南圖書出版公司。張慈娟(民86)。國民小學校長教學領導與學校效能之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。雷國鼎(民58)。教育行政(台十版)。台北：正中。趙廣林(民85)。國民小學校長教學領導之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。楊百世(民78)。國民小學校長教學視導之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學，高雄。楊振昇(民86)。教學領導理念之探討。國立台灣師範大學。學校教育革新專輯，236-263。楊振昇(民88)。我國國小校長從事教學領導概況、困境及其因應策略分析研究。暨大學報，３（１），183-236。魯先華(民83)。國民中學校長教學領導之研究。國立台灣師範大教櫭研究所碩士論文，未出版。劉真(民59)。教育行政。台北：正中。鄭進丁(民75)。國民小學校長角色之分析。高雄：復文。歐曉玟(民90)。彰化縣國民小學校長教學領導之研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所學校行政碩士論文，未出版蔡秀媛(民87)。國民小學校長教學領導及其影響因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。謝文全(民78)。教育行政。台北：文景。貳、英文部分 Drake﹐L.﹐& Roe W. H.（1986）.The principalship. New York﹕Macmillan. Doyle, M. E. & Rice, D.M.（2002）. Principal leadership. H igh Education﹐3（3）﹐49-52. Dwyer,D.C(1986).Understanding the principals’contribution to instruction .Peabody Journal of Educational Digest , 63(1) ,17-20. Eheng, H.Y. (1996) School contexts, principal characterietics , and instructienal eqqectiueness：A statistics analysis .Paper preented at the Amnual Meeting of the American Educational Reseasch Association . (ERIC Document Reproduction Sewice Vo.ED396408). Gewertz﹐C.（2003）.N.Y.C.Chancellor aims to bolster instructional leadership Education Week﹐22（16）﹐7-10. Griffin, M. S.(1993). Instructional leadership behaviors of Catholic secondary school principals.[ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT9327348. Hallinger, P. & Murphy,J.F（1987）.Instructional leadership in the school context. In Greenfield W.（Eds.）﹐Instructional Leadership﹕Concepts，issues﹐and controversies ﹐（pp.179-203）. Hurley, J. (1990). The organizational socialization of high school principals：A description and analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED320281 ) Keefe,J.W., & Jenkins, J. M.(1984).Instructional leadership handbook. Virginia: NASSP. Kesler, M. A. (1988). Pereeptions of Arizona elementary principals toward instructional leadership. [ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item： AAT8907813. Krajewski, R. J. (1978) . Secondary principals want to be instructional leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, 60 (1), 65. Leithwood, K. A.(1992). Transformational leadership : Where does it stand? Educational Digest, 58 (3) , 17-20 Leitner, D , (1988). Principal instructional management behavior and school effectiveness: An organization perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED302934） Mahmood, H. B. (1990). A study of principals perceptions of their competency needs in instructional leadership.(CD-ROM). Abstract from:ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts team:AAC9001589. Manasse, A. L. (1984).Principals as leaders of high-performing systems. Educational Leadership, 41(5), 42-46. Murphy﹐J.（1990）. Principal instruction leadership：in Turston, P. W. & Lotto L. S （Eds）. Avances in educational administration﹐Volume 1﹐Part B﹕Changing perspectives on the school﹐（163-200）.Greenwich﹐Conn.﹕JAI Press. Myers, M. D. (1992). Effective schools and the superintendency：Perception and practice. Contemporary Education, 63 (2) , 96-101. Peterson K. D. (1987). Administrative control and instructionoal leadership: Concepts, issues, and controversies (139-152). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Reitzug, U.C.(1997).Images of principal instructional leadership: From supervision to collaborative inquiry. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision ,12(4) ,324-343. Schoch, A. P. (1992). The relationship between instructional leadership behavior, school effectiveness, school size, gender, race, and years of principalship experience in elementary schools in South Carolina. [ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT9307987. Scott, M. A. (1988). The perceptions of elementary principals and teachers on selected instructional leadership practices in the Farifax Countary Public Schools (Virginia).[ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT8815579. Stroud, D. J. (1989). Factors influencing the instructional leadership behaviors of elementary school principals and the relationship to student achievement.[ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT9017489. Wallker, D. T. (1993). The influence of the superintendent on principal instructional leadership.[ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT9315960. Weber, J. R. (1987). Instructional leadership: Contexts and challenges.(Report No. MF01/pc02) Eugene, Or: Oregon School Study Council. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 288261) Zheng, H. Y. (1996). School contexts, principal characteristics , and instructional leadership effectiveness：A statistical analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED396408).
描述	碩士國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班 89911003 91
資料來源	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089911003
資料類型	thesis

dc.contributor.advisor	邱錦昌	zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors)	蔡呈譽	zh_TW
dc.creator (作者)	蔡呈譽	zh_TW
dc.date (日期)	2002	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	25-Apr-2010 14:35:55 (UTC+8)	-
dc.date.available	25-Apr-2010 14:35:55 (UTC+8)	-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間)	25-Apr-2010 14:35:55 (UTC+8)	-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers)	G0089911003	en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI)	http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/39106	-
dc.description (描述)	碩士	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	國立政治大學	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	學校行政碩士在職專班	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	89911003	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	91	zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)	本研究旨在探討桃園縣國民中學教師所期望的校長教學領導行為和所知覺到的校長教學領導實際行為，藉由文獻分析、問卷調查、半結構式訪談等方法，探討教師背景變項、學校背景變項的教師對校長教學領導行為之知覺差異情形。調查對象以桃園縣公立之國民中學教師為母群體，抽取723位教師（包括教師兼之主任與組長）做樣本，以自編『國民中學校長教學領導行為調查問卷』進行問卷調查，有效問卷隨即進行編碼、記分，然後輸入電腦建立資料檔，再以SPSS 10.0 for Windows 套裝軟体進行各項統計考驗。為彌補問卷調查之不足，抽取桃園縣具代表性的六位校長以自編『國民中學校長教學領導行為訪談題目』進行訪談，經錄音、編碼、整理後進行分析。本研究所獲得之主要結論如下：壹、桃園縣國中教師所知覺到校長教學領導行為的理想面與實踐面有明顯差異，理想面明顯大於實踐面貳、桃園縣國民中學教師對於校長教學領導在理想面的知覺度很高，其中以營造支持環境向度居七個層面之首，而以確保課程品質為最低參、桃園縣國民中學教師對於校長教學領導在實踐程度方面的知覺度屬中上程度，以營造支持環境層面居七個層面之首，而以激勵教師合作與互動最低肆、桃園縣國民中學教師在校長教學七個層面上的知覺，不管是理想面或實踐面，皆以營造支持環境為最高，且在校長訪談中亦以營造支持環境最為校長重視，此結果充分顯示校長與教師對校長教學領導的看法相當一致伍、桃園縣國中教師對校長教學領導的理想面，在男女性別教師變項、年資變項、擔任職務變項、學校所在地變項、設校時間變項並無差異。桃園縣國中教師對校長教學領導的實踐面，在年資變項、學校所在地變項、設校時間變項皆無明顯差異陸、桃園縣國中教師對校長教學領導在實踐面的性別變項上的知覺顯示有差異，男性教師比女性教師認為校長更有從事教學領導行為柒、桃園縣國民中學一般教師與兼行政教師對校長教學領導在實踐面有明顯差異，兼行政之教師比一般教師認為校長在教學領導的實踐程度上較高捌、桃園縣國中教師對校長教學領導在學校規模變項，不管理想面或實踐面的知覺度都以24班以下為最高依據研究結論，本研究提出以下建議：壹、對教育主管機關之建議一、加強充實校長教學領導的理念二、師資與校長培訓中加入教學領導的課程三、適時縮小學校規模四、校長評鑑時應重視教學領導項目貳、對國民中學校長的建議一、充實教學領導知能，積極扮演教學領導角色二、建立教學領導團隊，引導教師合作與互動三、推行教學領時應積極營造良好的學校文化四、校長應致力於確保課程品五、加強各領域教學研究會功能參、對未來研究的建議未來研究對象可進一步擴大地區範圍，研究變項應該加入教師學歷變項學區家長變項及學校效能，學生學習成就等相關變項，為了更能瞭解校長教學領導行為，未來的研究宜加入實際觀察、個案研究等方式。	zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)	The purpose of this study was surveying the principals’ instructional leadership behaviors expected and perceived by the junior high school teachers in Taoyuan County. The study explored the differences in the sense of the principal’s instructional leadership behaviors perceived by the teachers in teacher background and school background variables. The study took Taoyuan County’s public junior high school teachers as population from which 723 teachers (including teachers as part-time directors and chiefs) were randomly sampled. The effective questionnaires are then encoded, scored and stored, finally analyzed by SPSS 10.0. To supplement the questionnaire survey, the study also conducts in-depth interviews with six principals among all public junior high schools in Taoyuan County with the “the Junior High School Principal’s Instructional Leadership Behaviors” developed by the author. The conclusions and implications of the present study are summarized below: 1. Significant differences are found between what expected and what actually realized in the principal’s instructional leadership behaviors. What expected are higher than what realized. 2. The teachers have a high perception on the expectation of principal’s instructional leadership. Among the seven major aspects of instructional leadership, Supportive Environment Creation ranks as top priority and Course Quality Assurance as the last. 3. The realization aspect of the principal’s instructional leadership behaviors perceived by the teachers was above average. Among the seven major aspects of principals’ instructional leadership, The dimension of supportive environment creation ranked as top priority and the encouraging teachers’ cooperation and interactions as the last. 4. Among the seven instructional leadership aspects of the principal perceived by the teachers, The demension of supportive environment creation ranked as top one both in expectation and realization and this aspect is also most valued by all principals interviewed. This result demonstrates a high consistency between the principals and teachers on the view of the principal’s instructional leadership. 5. The teachers’ perception of expectation to principal’s instructional leadership in variables including teacher’s sex, service term, position, school location, school founding time shows no difference. The degree of realization of the principal’s instructional behaviors perceived by the teachers shows no significant difference in variables including service term, school location and school founding time. 6. The male teachers’ perception of realization of principal’s instructional leadership was significantly higher than female teachers’ in sex variable. 7. The average teachers perceived a high degree of realization in the principal’s instructional leadership behaviors than the teachers as part-time administrators did. 8. The teachers’ perception of both expectation and realization of principal’s instructional leadership in school scale implies that the highest score of both arises in a school consisting of maximum 24 classes. And then there are some suggestions presenting by this study as follow: 1. Suggestions to the education authorities: (1) Promote and reinforce the concept of principal’s instructional leadership. (2) Enrich the teacher and principal training programs with Instructional Leadership Courses. (3) Downsize the school scale in time (4) Value the instructional leadership areas during evaluating principals. 2. Suggestions to junior high school principals: (1) Advance in instructional leadership knowledge and actively play the role in instructional leadership. (2) Form Instructional Leadership Teams to lead teachers to optimal cooperation and interactions. (3) Shape the school with excellent school culture actively while launching and implementing instructional leadership. (4) Devote to course quality assurance. (5) Enhance the research society’s functions 3. Suggestions to future researches : It is advisable to expand in regional scope in future study and to expand the study variables that include variables such as Teacher’s Diploma, School District & Parents, School Performance, Student’s Academic Achievements, etc.; further, to better understand the principal’s instructional leadership behaviors, it is advisable to use methods such as Actual Observation, Case Study, etc.	en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents	第一章緒論…………………………………………………………1 第一節研究動機……………………………………………………………….1 第二節研究目的與研究問題………………………………………………….3 第三節名詞釋義……………………………………………………………….5 第四節研究範圍與限制……………………………………………………….6 第二章文獻探討……………………………………………………..9 第一節校長的角色與任務…………………………………………………….9 第二節校長教學領導概念的演進……………………………………………19 第三節校長教學領導之意義與內涵…………………………………………23 第四節有關校長教學領導之相關實徵研究…………………………………35 第三章研究設計與實施…………………………………………….43 第一節研究架構………………………………………………………………43 第二節研究方法………………………………………………………………45 第三節研究對象………………………………………………………………46 第四節研究工具………………………………………………………………50 第五節實施程序………………………………………………………………54 第六節資料處理………………………………………………………………56 第四章研究結果分析與討論……………………………………….. 57 第一節整體回收問卷調查基本資料分析……………………………………57 第二節桃園縣國中教師及學校背景變項對校長教學領導行為層面重要程度分析……………………………………………………………………58 第三節桃園縣國中教師及學校背景變項對校長教學領導行為層面實踐程度分析……………………………………………………………………66 第四節桃園縣國中教師及學校背景變項對校長教學領導行為層面在重要程度與實踐程度之分析…………………………………………………74 第五節桃園縣國中校長訪談結果之分析……………………………………..87 第五章結論與建議……………………………………………………99 第一節結論……………………………………………………………………..99 第二節建議…………………………………………………………………….102 參考文獻………………………………………………………………107 附錄……………………………………………………………………113 附錄一國民中學校長教學領導行為調查卷………………………….……..115 附錄二國民中學校長教學領導行為調查問卷初稿………………………...119 附錄三校長訪談大綱………………………………………………………...125 附錄四指導教授信函………………………………………………………...127 表次表2-1 校長的角色………………………………………………………………15 表2-2 校長教學領導內涵之分類………………………………………………33 表2-3 教師對校長教學領導之知覺有無差異情形…………………………….41 表3-1 問卷調查抽樣人數統計表……………………………………………….47 表3-2 寄發及回收問卷數目表…………………………………………………47 表3-3 接受訪談之六位校長學校背景資料及訪談時間地點…………………49 表3-4 問卷初稿審查專家名單…………………………………………………50 表3-5 問卷初稿之專家意見分析……………………………………………….51 表4-1 受訪者之性別、年資、職務、學校規模、地點、設校時間分佈情形. ……………………………………………………………………………58 表4-2 性別對校長教學領導行為層面重要程度之差異顯著性分析摘要表…59 表4-3 任教年資對校長教學領導行為層面重要程度之差異顯著性分析摘要表…………………………………………………………………………60 表4-4 擔任職務之教師對校長教學領導行為層面重要程度之差異顯著性分析摘要表…………………………………………………………………………..61 表4-5學校規模對校長教學領導行為層面重要程度之差異顯助性分析摘要表…………………………………………………………………………62 表4-6學校規模對校長教學領導行為層面重要程度之差異顯著性事後比較表分析摘要表……………………………………………………………63 表4-7學校所在地對校長教學領導行為層面重要程度之差異顯著性分析摘要表……………………………………………………………………....64 表4-8學校成立時間對校長教學領導行為層面重要程度之差異顯著性分析摘要表……………………………………………………………………………65 表4-9校長教學領導行為層面重要程度之排序分析摘要表………………….66 表4-10以性別變項對校長教學領導行為層面實踐程度知覺之分析摘要表 ………………………………………………….67 表4-11 以任教年資變項對校長教學領導行為層面實踐程度知覺之分析摘要表…………………………………………………………………...68 表4-12 以擔任職務之教師變項對校長教學領導行為層面實踐程度知覺之分析摘要表…………………………………………………………………………69 表4-13 學校規模變項對校長教學領導行為層面實踐程度知覺之分析….…70 表4-14 以學校所在地變項對校長教學領導行為層面實踐程度知覺之分析摘要表……………………………………………………………………71 表4-15 以學校成立時間變項對校長教學領導行為層面實踐程度知覺之分析摘要表………………………………………………………………….…..72 表4-16校長教學領導行為層面實踐程度之排序分析摘要表………………..73 表4-17校長教學領導行為各層面重要度及實踐程度之差異……………….74. 表4-18性別對校長教學領導行為各層面重要度及實踐程度之差異…..…....75 表4-19性別對校長教學領導行為層面重要及實踐程度兩者之差異顯著性分析摘要表……………………………………………………….…..76 表4-20任教年資對校長教學領導行為各層面重要度及實踐程度之差..……77 表4-21任教年資對校長教學領導行為層面重要及實踐程度兩者之差異顯著性分析摘要表……………………………………………………………78 表4-22擔任職務對校長教學領導行為各層面重要度及實踐程度之差異…...79 表4-23擔任職務之教師對校長教學領導行為層面重要及實踐程度兩者之差異顯著性分析摘要表………………………………………………..…..80 表4-24學校規模對校長教學領導行為各層面重要度及實踐程度之差異.…..81 表4-25學校規模對校長教學領導行為層面重要及實踐程度兩者之差異顯著性分析摘要表…………………………………………………….…...82 表4-26學校所在地對校長教學領導行為各層面重要度及實踐程度之差異 ……………………………………………………………………...….83 表4-27學校所在地對校長教學領導行為層面重要及實踐程度兩者之差異顯著性分析摘要表……………………………………………….……..84 表4-28學校設校時間對校長教學領導行為各層面重要度及實踐程度之差異 …………………………………………………………………..……85 表4-29學校成立時間對校長教學領導行為層面重要及實踐程度兩者之差異顯著性分析摘要表…………………………………………………………….86 表4-30校長對校長教學領導七個層面之重視層面…………………………...95 圖次圖3-1 研究架構圖………………………………………………………………43 圖3-2 研究實施流程圖…………………………………………………………55	zh_TW
dc.language.iso	en_US	-
dc.source.uri (資料來源)	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089911003	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	校長教學領導	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	教學領導行為知覺	zh_TW
dc.title (題名)	桃園縣國中教師對校長教學領導行為知覺之研究	zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型)	thesis	en
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	壹、中文部分	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	王仁宏（民80）。歷年教育人員甄試詳解。台北：旭昇圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	江文雄（民90）。校長的職責。載於吳清基主編：學校行政新論。台北：師大書苑。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	行政院教育改革審議委員會（民85）。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北：行政院教育改革審議委員會。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	李玉林(民90)。桃園縣國小校長教學領導角色知覺與實踐之研究。國立台北師範學院。國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	李安明(民88)。「為教學而行政」的校長教學領導：理論與實務。教育政策論壇，2（2），158-203。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	李安明(民86)。我國國小校長教學領導之研究。行政院國科會專題研究計劃成果報告，計劃編號NSC 86-2413-H-134-006。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	李新寶（民90）。國民小學校長教學領導行為與交師教學效能之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所學校行政碩士班碩士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	邱錦昌(民80)。教育視導之理論與實際。台北：五南。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	邱錦昌(民77)。台灣地區國民中學教學視導工作之研究。國立政治大學博士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	呂木琳(民87)。教學視導一理論與實務。台北：五南。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	吳清山（民90）。中小學實施校長評鑑的挑戰課題與因應策略。教育研究月刊。84。28-36.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	陳美言(民87)。國民小學校長教學領導與教師教學自我效能關係之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	陳義明（民81）。學校行政領導－辦學理念與實務。台中：台灣省立台中第二高級中學。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	黃昆輝(民61)。視導工作的新趨勢。師友月刊，65，8-12。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	張弘勳（民86）。國民中小學實施學校本位管理之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	張振成（民87）。校長之角色與作為。中等教育，49(4)，7-11。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	張清濱（民77）。學校行政。台北：台灣書店。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	張碧娟(民91)。校長教學領導之角色觀點。載於張銀富主編：學校行政理論與應用254-256頁。台北：五南。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	張碧娟(民88)。國民中學校長教學領導，學校教學領導，學校教學氣氛與教師教學效能之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	張德銳(民84)。教育行政研究。台北：五南圖書出版公司。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	張慈娟(民86)。國民小學校長教學領導與學校效能之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	雷國鼎(民58)。教育行政(台十版)。台北：正中。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	趙廣林(民85)。國民小學校長教學領導之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	楊百世(民78)。國民小學校長教學視導之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學，高雄。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	楊振昇(民86)。教學領導理念之探討。國立台灣師範大學。學校教育革新專輯，236-263。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	楊振昇(民88)。我國國小校長從事教學領導概況、困境及其因應策略分析研究。暨大學報，３（１），183-236。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	魯先華(民83)。國民中學校長教學領導之研究。國立台灣師範大教櫭研究所碩士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	劉真(民59)。教育行政。台北：正中。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	鄭進丁(民75)。國民小學校長角色之分析。高雄：復文。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	歐曉玟(民90)。彰化縣國民小學校長教學領導之研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所學校行政碩士論文，未出版	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	蔡秀媛(民87)。國民小學校長教學領導及其影響因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	謝文全(民78)。教育行政。台北：文景。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	貳、英文部分	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Drake﹐L.﹐& Roe W. H.（1986）.The principalship. New York﹕Macmillan.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Doyle, M. E. & Rice, D.M.（2002）. Principal leadership. H igh Education﹐3（3）﹐49-52.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Dwyer,D.C(1986).Understanding the principals’contribution to instruction .Peabody Journal of Educational Digest , 63(1) ,17-20.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Eheng, H.Y. (1996) School contexts, principal characterietics , and instructienal eqqectiueness：A statistics analysis .Paper preented at the Amnual Meeting of the American Educational Reseasch Association . (ERIC Document Reproduction Sewice Vo.ED396408).	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Gewertz﹐C.（2003）.N.Y.C.Chancellor aims to bolster instructional leadership	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Education Week﹐22（16）﹐7-10.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Griffin, M. S.(1993). Instructional leadership behaviors of Catholic secondary school principals.[ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT9327348.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Hallinger, P. & Murphy,J.F（1987）.Instructional leadership in the school context. In	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Greenfield W.（Eds.）﹐Instructional Leadership﹕Concepts，issues﹐and	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	controversies ﹐（pp.179-203）.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Hurley, J. (1990). The organizational socialization of high school principals：A description and analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED320281 )	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Keefe,J.W., & Jenkins, J. M.(1984).Instructional leadership handbook. Virginia: NASSP.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Kesler, M. A. (1988). Pereeptions of Arizona elementary principals toward instructional leadership. [ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item： AAT8907813.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Krajewski, R. J. (1978) . Secondary principals want to be instructional leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, 60 (1), 65.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Leithwood, K. A.(1992). Transformational leadership : Where does it stand? Educational Digest, 58 (3) , 17-20	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Leitner, D , (1988). Principal instructional management behavior and school effectiveness: An organization perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED302934）	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Mahmood, H. B. (1990). A study of principals perceptions of their competency needs in instructional leadership.(CD-ROM). Abstract from:ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts team:AAC9001589.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Manasse, A. L. (1984).Principals as leaders of high-performing systems. Educational Leadership, 41(5), 42-46.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Murphy﹐J.（1990）. Principal instruction leadership：in Turston, P. W. & Lotto L. S （Eds）.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Avances in educational administration﹐Volume 1﹐Part B﹕Changing perspectives	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	on the school﹐（163-200）.Greenwich﹐Conn.﹕JAI Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Myers, M. D. (1992). Effective schools and the superintendency：Perception and practice. Contemporary Education, 63 (2) , 96-101.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Peterson K. D. (1987). Administrative control and instructionoal leadership: Concepts, issues, and controversies (139-152). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Reitzug, U.C.(1997).Images of principal instructional leadership: From supervision to collaborative inquiry. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision ,12(4) ,324-343.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Schoch, A. P. (1992). The relationship between instructional leadership behavior, school effectiveness, school size, gender, race, and years of principalship experience in elementary schools in South Carolina. [ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT9307987.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Scott, M. A. (1988). The perceptions of elementary principals and teachers on selected instructional leadership practices in the Farifax Countary Public Schools (Virginia).[ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT8815579.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Stroud, D. J. (1989). Factors influencing the instructional leadership behaviors of elementary school principals and the relationship to student achievement.[ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT9017489.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Wallker, D. T. (1993). The influence of the superintendent on principal instructional leadership.[ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT9315960.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Weber, J. R. (1987). Instructional leadership: Contexts and challenges.(Report No. MF01/pc02) Eugene, Or: Oregon School Study Council. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 288261)	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Zheng, H. Y. (1996). School contexts, principal characteristics , and instructional leadership effectiveness：A statistical analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED396408).	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	壹、中文部分	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	王仁宏（民80）。歷年教育人員甄試詳解。台北：旭昇圖書。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	江文雄（民90）。校長的職責。載於吳清基主編：學校行政新論。台北：師大書苑。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	行政院教育改革審議委員會（民85）。教育改革總諮議報告書。台北：行政院教育改革審議委員會。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	李玉林(民90)。桃園縣國小校長教學領導角色知覺與實踐之研究。國立台北師範學院。國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	李安明(民88)。「為教學而行政」的校長教學領導：理論與實務。教育政策論壇，2（2），158-203。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	李安明(民86)。我國國小校長教學領導之研究。行政院國科會專題研究計劃成果報告，計劃編號NSC 86-2413-H-134-006。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	李新寶（民90）。國民小學校長教學領導行為與交師教學效能之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所學校行政碩士班碩士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	邱錦昌(民80)。教育視導之理論與實際。台北：五南。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	邱錦昌(民77)。台灣地區國民中學教學視導工作之研究。國立政治大學博士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	呂木琳(民87)。教學視導一理論與實務。台北：五南。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	吳清山（民90）。中小學實施校長評鑑的挑戰課題與因應策略。教育研究月刊。84。28-36.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	陳美言(民87)。國民小學校長教學領導與教師教學自我效能關係之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	陳義明（民81）。學校行政領導－辦學理念與實務。台中：台灣省立台中第二高級中學。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	黃昆輝(民61)。視導工作的新趨勢。師友月刊，65，8-12。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	張弘勳（民86）。國民中小學實施學校本位管理之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	張振成（民87）。校長之角色與作為。中等教育，49(4)，7-11。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	張清濱（民77）。學校行政。台北：台灣書店。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	張碧娟(民91)。校長教學領導之角色觀點。載於張銀富主編：學校行政理論與應用254-256頁。台北：五南。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	張碧娟(民88)。國民中學校長教學領導，學校教學領導，學校教學氣氛與教師教學效能之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	張德銳(民84)。教育行政研究。台北：五南圖書出版公司。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	張慈娟(民86)。國民小學校長教學領導與學校效能之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	雷國鼎(民58)。教育行政(台十版)。台北：正中。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	趙廣林(民85)。國民小學校長教學領導之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	楊百世(民78)。國民小學校長教學視導之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學，高雄。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	楊振昇(民86)。教學領導理念之探討。國立台灣師範大學。學校教育革新專輯，236-263。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	楊振昇(民88)。我國國小校長從事教學領導概況、困境及其因應策略分析研究。暨大學報，３（１），183-236。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	魯先華(民83)。國民中學校長教學領導之研究。國立台灣師範大教櫭研究所碩士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	劉真(民59)。教育行政。台北：正中。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	鄭進丁(民75)。國民小學校長角色之分析。高雄：復文。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	歐曉玟(民90)。彰化縣國民小學校長教學領導之研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所學校行政碩士論文，未出版	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	蔡秀媛(民87)。國民小學校長教學領導及其影響因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	謝文全(民78)。教育行政。台北：文景。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	貳、英文部分	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Drake﹐L.﹐& Roe W. H.（1986）.The principalship. New York﹕Macmillan.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Doyle, M. E. & Rice, D.M.（2002）. Principal leadership. H igh Education﹐3（3）﹐49-52.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Dwyer,D.C(1986).Understanding the principals’contribution to instruction .Peabody Journal of Educational Digest , 63(1) ,17-20.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Eheng, H.Y. (1996) School contexts, principal characterietics , and instructienal eqqectiueness：A statistics analysis .Paper preented at the Amnual Meeting of the American Educational Reseasch Association . (ERIC Document Reproduction Sewice Vo.ED396408).	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Gewertz﹐C.（2003）.N.Y.C.Chancellor aims to bolster instructional leadership	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Education Week﹐22（16）﹐7-10.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Griffin, M. S.(1993). Instructional leadership behaviors of Catholic secondary school principals.[ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT9327348.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Hallinger, P. & Murphy,J.F（1987）.Instructional leadership in the school context. In	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Greenfield W.（Eds.）﹐Instructional Leadership﹕Concepts，issues﹐and	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	controversies ﹐（pp.179-203）.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Hurley, J. (1990). The organizational socialization of high school principals：A description and analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED320281 )	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Keefe,J.W., & Jenkins, J. M.(1984).Instructional leadership handbook. Virginia: NASSP.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Kesler, M. A. (1988). Pereeptions of Arizona elementary principals toward instructional leadership. [ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item： AAT8907813.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Krajewski, R. J. (1978) . Secondary principals want to be instructional leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, 60 (1), 65.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Leithwood, K. A.(1992). Transformational leadership : Where does it stand? Educational Digest, 58 (3) , 17-20	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Leitner, D , (1988). Principal instructional management behavior and school effectiveness: An organization perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED302934）	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Mahmood, H. B. (1990). A study of principals perceptions of their competency needs in instructional leadership.(CD-ROM). Abstract from:ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts team:AAC9001589.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Manasse, A. L. (1984).Principals as leaders of high-performing systems. Educational Leadership, 41(5), 42-46.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Murphy﹐J.（1990）. Principal instruction leadership：in Turston, P. W. & Lotto L. S （Eds）.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Avances in educational administration﹐Volume 1﹐Part B﹕Changing perspectives	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	on the school﹐（163-200）.Greenwich﹐Conn.﹕JAI Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Myers, M. D. (1992). Effective schools and the superintendency：Perception and practice. Contemporary Education, 63 (2) , 96-101.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Peterson K. D. (1987). Administrative control and instructionoal leadership: Concepts, issues, and controversies (139-152). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Reitzug, U.C.(1997).Images of principal instructional leadership: From supervision to collaborative inquiry. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision ,12(4) ,324-343.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Schoch, A. P. (1992). The relationship between instructional leadership behavior, school effectiveness, school size, gender, race, and years of principalship experience in elementary schools in South Carolina. [ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT9307987.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Scott, M. A. (1988). The perceptions of elementary principals and teachers on selected instructional leadership practices in the Farifax Countary Public Schools (Virginia).[ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT8815579.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Stroud, D. J. (1989). Factors influencing the instructional leadership behaviors of elementary school principals and the relationship to student achievement.[ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT9017489.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Wallker, D. T. (1993). The influence of the superintendent on principal instructional leadership.[ CD-ROM]. Abstracts from：ProQuest File：Dissertation Abstracts Item：AAT9315960.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Weber, J. R. (1987). Instructional leadership: Contexts and challenges.(Report No. MF01/pc02) Eugene, Or: Oregon School Study Council. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 288261)	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	Zheng, H. Y. (1996). School contexts, principal characteristics , and instructional leadership effectiveness：A statistical analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED396408).	zh_TW

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

Google Scholar^TM