學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 國民中學校長道德領導與兼任行政職務教師工作滿意關係之研究
作者 蘇美珍
貢獻者 林邦傑
蘇美珍
關鍵詞 領導
道德領導
工作滿意
leadership
moral leadership
job satisfaction
日期 2004
上傳時間 25-Apr-2010 15:46:53 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究的主要目的在瞭解(一)國民中學校長道德領導的現況;(二)國民中學兼任行政職務教師工作滿意現況;(三)不同背景變項對校長道德領導的差異;(四)不同背景變項對兼任行政職務教師工作滿意之差異;(五)國民中學校長道德領導與兼任行政職務教師工作滿意之相關情形;(六)國民中學校長道德領導與兼任行政職務教師背景變項對兼任行政職務教師工作滿意度是否具有預測功能。
研究採用問卷調查法,以桃園縣55所國民中學全體兼任行政職務教師為母群體,選取38校526位兼任行政職務教師為受試者,並以改編之「國民中學校長道德領導問卷」與「國民中學兼任行政職務教師工作滿意問卷」施測,計回收有效問卷465份,所得資料以SPSS/PC10.0統計套裝軟體進行統計分析,並透過描述統計、單因子變異數分析、Pearson積差相關分析、逐步多元迴歸等統計方法加以分析與解釋,所獲得主要結論如下:
一、 國民中學校長整體道德領導及各分層面(「道德領導問題」除外)皆屬中上程度。
二、 國民中學兼任行政職務教師因職位不同在覺知校長道德領導上有顯著差異。
三、 國民中學兼任行政職務教師工作滿意屬中上程度,其中在「人際關係」上最高,其次依序為「工作環境」、「主管領導」、「社會地位」、「工作本身」、「升遷考核」及「薪資福利」。
四、 國民中學兼任行政職務教師工作滿意因兼任行政年資之不同而有顯著差異。
五、 國民中學校長整體道德領導及各分層面,與兼任行政職務教師整體工作滿意及各分層面有顯著相關。
六、 在國民中學兼任行政職務教師工作滿意預測上,以「道德領導策略」最具預測力,其次依序為「道德領導問題」、「道德領導作法」、「職位」、「道德領導原因」、「道德領導功能」與「兼任行政職務年資」。
根據研究結果,對教育行政機關及校長提出建議如下:
一、 教育行政機關應建立道德倫理之校長培育及進修制度。
二、 教育行政機關應將道德領導納入校長遴選的指標。
三、 教育行政機關應訂定獎勵兼任行政職務教師之辦法。
四、 校長應利用各種機會充實自我的道德領導知能。
五、 校長應以學校整體利益為優先考量加強建構學校的倫理環境。
六、 校長應建立初任或資淺組長的輔導制度,並對兼任行政職務教師主動關懷、適時鼓勵。
The research on the relation between the moral leadership of junior high school principals and the job satisfaction of concurrently administrative teachers.

Abstract

The main purpose of this research is to analyze: (1)the current status of junior high school principals in the moral leadership; (2)the current status of the job satisfaction of junior high school concurrently administrative teachers; (3)the differences of different background variables to the principals’ moral leadership; (4) the differences of different background variables to the job satisfaction of concurrently administrative teachers; (5)related situations on the principals’ moral leaderships and job satisfaction of concurrently administrative teachers; (6)whether or not there is a predicting function of the principals’ moral leadership to concurrently administrative teachers’ job satisfaction within their different background variables.

This research conducts the survey study with concurrently administrative teachers from 55 junior high schools in Taoyuan County as a pool study. By randomly selecting 526 concurrently administrative teachers from 38 schools to be tested, they were given the revised versions of “the questionnaire of junior high school principals’ moral leadership” and “the questionnaire of junior high school concurrently administrative teachers’ job satisfaction”; end up with 465 valuable questionnaires and be detailed discussed. The obtained data carries on the statistical analysis by the SPSS/PC10.0 statistics software package and was analyzed and explained in advance by descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA analysis of variance, Pearson product-moment correlation analysis and multiple stepwise regression. The obtained conclusion as follows:

1. The whole of junior high school principals’ moral leadership and its each level (excluding the problem of the moral leadership) meets the middle upper level.
2. With the different job positions, concurrently administrative teachers have different perceptions on the principals’ moral leadership.
3. The job satisfaction of the concurrently administrative teachers meets the middle upper level. Among all, the personal relation is the highest and following by the job environment, supervisors’ lead, social status, job itself, promotion and evaluation, salary and benefits.
4. With different year services, concurrently administrative teachers have distinct job satisfaction.
5. There is obvious correlation between the whole of the principals’ moral leadership and its each level and the job satisfaction of the concurrently administrative teachers and its each level.
6. In talking about the prediction about the job satisfaction of the concurrently administrative teachers, the strategy of the moral leadership has the highest predicting, following by the problem of the moral leadership, the action of the moral leadership, job positions, the reason of the moral leadership, the function of the moral leadership and the year services as concurrently administrative teachers.

According to the research result, it suggests to the government institution of education and school principals as follows:
1. The government institution of education should establish moral leadership to train up school principals and for them to take advanced courses.
2. The government institution of education should include moral leadership in the index of selecting principals.
3. The government institution of education should specify rewards for concurrently administrative teachers.
4. School principals should take every advantage to enrich self-knowledge in moral leadership.
5. School principals should take the whole benefit of schools as the priority consideration to strength up the moral environment of schools.
6. School principals should establish counseling system to those concurrently administrative teachers who are fresh or junior in the service and actively concern concurrently administrative teachers and encourage them in proper time.
參考文獻 壹、 中文部分
朱淑子(2002)。國小校長轉化領導、互易領導與教師工作滿意關係之研究。台東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
任晟蓀(1981)。國中校長領導型式輔導教師教育背景對輔導教師工作滿足之影響。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
李安明(2003)。析論二十世紀末(1985-1995)學校領導理論之發展。教育研究月刊,111,49-66。
李富美(1998)。校長角色與學校效能之研究—一所國民小學之觀察。國立台東師範學院初等教育學系研究所,未出版。
吳清山,黃旭鈞(1999)。「教育人員專業倫理準則」初步建構。載於教育行政論壇第四次研討會會議手冊,169-189。
吳清山,林天佑(2002)。道德領導。教育研究月刊,98,144。
吳清基(1980)。國民中學組織結構與較師工作滿意之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
何東日(2003)。品格教育何在?。中央日報全民論壇( 2003年11月24日)。2003年12月20日取自http://www.cdn.com.tw/daily/2003/11/24/text/921124i6.htm
林火旺(2004)。倫理學。台北市:五南。
林明地(2000)。校長領導的影響:近三十年來研究結果的分析。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,2(2),232-254。
林明地(1999)。重建學校領導的倫理學觀念。教育政策論壇,2(2),129-157。
林純雯(2002a)。學校行政的危機是技術與詩意的衝突。學校行政雙月刊,19,139-148。
林純雯(2002b)。學校行政領導的倫理學觀點。中等教育雙月刊,19,139-148。
林純雯(2001a)。國民中學校長道德領導之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
林純雯(2001b)。道德領導—學校行政領導的新面向。中等教育,52(4),110-127。
林新發(1983)。五專校長領導方式與教師工作滿意關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
范熾文(2002)。學校行政原理。台北:師大書苑。
范熾文(2001)。學校領導的倫理議題—以關懷倫理為例。中等教育,52(5),162-175。
范熾文(2000)。學校行政決定的革新趨向:倫理決定。學校行政雙月刊,8,55-67。 中華民國學校行政研究學會主編。
施鵬程(2003)。學習行組織的核心價值與道德領導。人事月刊,36(6),49-56。
秦夢群(2003)。教育行政—理論部份。台北:五南。
秦夢群(1983)。教育行政理論與應用(初版)。台北:五南。
秦夢群、黃貞裕(2001)。教育行政研究方法論。台北市:五南。
梁丁財(2002)。國民小學校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
陳月紅(1989)。台北市國民中學家政科教師之工作滿意。國立台灣師範大學家正教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
陳秋容(2001)。國民小學校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意關係之研究—以台灣北部五縣市為例。國立新竹師範學院碩士論文,未出版,新竹。
陳俊雄(2000)。全球倫理,道德教育的加強和重建。師說,175,49-50。
章珮瑜(2000)。學校文化與教師組織承諾及工作滿意關係之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
張明輝(1998)。校園民主應否「戒急用忍」?—中小學學校自主改革成效初探,載於高強華、楊思偉主編,鬆與綁的再反省,224-256。台北:五南。
張鳳燕(2002)。校長領導的道德責任。國教天地,148,41-46
張憲庭(2003)。從倫理觀點探討國民小學校長道德與價值領導。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士論文,未出版。
許士軍(1977)。工作滿足、個人特徵與組織氣候—文獻探討及實證研究。政大學報,35,13-56。
許川濠(1998)。台北市國民小學組織溝通行為與教師工作滿意關係之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
舒緒緯(1990)。國民小學教師溝通滿意與工作滿意關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
黃乃熒(2004)。後現代學校行政倫理及其兩難困境之解決。教育研究集刊,50(3),1-29。
黃乃熒(2001)。教育決策的正當性:決策倫理及典範的討論。載於師大學報教育類,46(1),1-19。
黃乃熒(2000)。後現代教育的行政哲學。台北:師大書苑。
黃乃熒(1995)。脈絡領導與學校行政創意及倫理的探討。中學教育學報,2,1-39。
黃婉婷(2003)。國民小學校長倫理取向與教師工作滿意之相關研究。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士論文,未出版。
黃敏榮(2003)。高級中學行政兼職教師角色壓力、社會支持與工作滿意關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
黃隆民(1985)。國民中學教師角色衝突與工作滿意之關係。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
黃德祥、謝龍卿(2004)。品格與道德教育的內涵與實施。教育研究月刊,120(4),35-43。
黃錦樟(2000)。傳統文化與道德領導:傳統道德領導能否取代西方理論成為東亞地區學校領導的範式?新世紀教育發展與規劃學術研討會論文。國立台灣師範大學教育學系主辦,未出版。
游淑惠(2003)。國小校長魅力領導與教師組織承諾及工作滿意之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
游肇賢(2003)。國中兼任行政工作教師角色衝突與工作滿意之調查研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
葉子超(2000)。道德領導在國民中小學教育之運用。學校行政雙月刊,23-29。
楊煥烘(1988)。國小校長領導型式與教師成熟度之配合對教師工作滿意及組織效能認知的影響。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
鄒浮安(1982)。我國高級職業學校教師工作滿意程度及其影響因素之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
廖裕月(1998)。國小校長轉化領導型式與領導效能之研究—以北部四縣市為例。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所,未出版。
蔡培村(1985)。國民中小學校長的領導特質、權力基礎、學校組織結構及組織氣候與教師工作滿足關係之比較研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
蔡淑苓(1990)。幼稚園園長領導型式與教師工作滿意之關係。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
蔡進雄(2003)。論校長如何展現倫理領導。人文及社會學科教育通訊,14(1),25-36。
鄭彩鳳(2001)。教育改革中校長工作滿意校長效能與學校效能之研究:國小校長之訪談研究。教育學刊,17,167。
閻自安(2000)。台灣地區國民小學學校本位決策與校長領導方式教師工作滿意度之關係研究。國立政治大學教育學系研究所博士論文,未出版。
謝文全(2004)。教育行政學。台北:高等教育。
謝文全(1998)。道德領導—學校行政領導的另一扇窗。載於林玉體主編跨世紀的教育演變。台北:文景。
謝文全(1990)。教育行政—理論與實務。台北:文景。
謝文全(1976)。中華民國與愛荷華州校長領導型態與教師工作滿意關係之比較研究。美國愛荷華州大學博士論文,未出版。
謝月香(2003)。國民小學教師兼任行政職務工作滿意度之研究。國立花蓮師範學院教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
謝金青(1992)。國民小學行政兼職教師角色衝突與工作滿意程度之研究。國立台灣師範阿學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
謝美慧(2000)。新世紀教育行政領導理念—後現代領導。學校行政雙月刊,9,64-75。
謝龍卿(2004)。品格與道德教育的內涵與實施。教育研究月刊,120,35-43。
韓繼成(2002)。國民中學訓導人員角色壓力、人格特質與工作滿意度的關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
顏童文(2002)。中部四縣市國民小學校長道德領導之研究。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文,未出版。
簡成熙(2004)。道德教育的進行:傳統、現代與後現代的省思。基礎教育學報,13(1),81-95。(Journal of basic education,13(1). The Chinese University of Hong Kong 2004)
羅明忠(2003)。台中市國民小學校長領導行為與教師工作滿意度相關之研究。台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
蘇進棻(1991)。國民中小學校長角色衝突與工作滿意關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
饒安邦(1991)。台北市國小教師行政兼職與工作滿意之啟示。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
貳、 西文部分
Adams, J.S.(1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abcdrmal and Social Psychology. 67, 422-436.
Adams, J.S.(1972). Toward an understanding of inequity. In G. A. Yukl & K. N. Wexley, Reading in organization and industrial psychology. London:Oxford University Press, 194-210.
Alderfer, C. P.(1972). Existence, relatendness, and growth. New York: Free Press.
Anello, E. & Hernandez, J.B.(1996).Moral leadership. Santa Cruz, Bolivia: Universidad Nur.
Bates, R.(1993). On knowing: Cultural and critical approaches to educational administration. Educational Management and Administration, 21(3), 171-176.
Beck, L. G.(1994). Reclaiming educational administration as caring profession. New York:Teachers college, Columbia university.
Beck, L. G. & Murphy, J.(1994).Ethics in educational leadership programs: An expanding role. California: Corwin Press, INC.
Begley, P. T. & Leonard, P. E.(1999).The values of educational administration. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Bottery, M.(1993).The ethics of educational management:Personal, social and political perspective on school organization. New York:Gassell.
Burns, J.(1978).Leadership. New York:Harper and Row.
Coppola, D. L.(1998).Moral leadership:A proposed theory illustrated by select Catholic secondary school principals. Retrieved November 04,2004,from: http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/9839504
Davis, A. J.(2002).Principles and Prospects for the development of MPI. Journal of Macao Polytechnic Institute. 1.
Dessler, G.(1980). Human behavior improving performance at work. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.
Farrell, D. J.(1978). A causal model of job satisfaction. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1, 4339-A.
Gibson, J. L., J. M. Ivancevich, & J. M. Donnelly,(1991). Organization: behavior, structure, Precess, Richard. D Irwin, Inc.
Gilligan, C.(1982).In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, Mass. Havard University Press.
Getzels, J. w., Lipham, J. M. & Campbell, R. F.(1968). Educational administration as a social process, New York:Harper & Row Publishers.
Greenfield, W.D.(1993).Articulating values and ethics in administrator preparation. Educational administration in a pluralistic society, 267-287. Albany, New York:SUNY Press.
Greenfield, T.(1991). Re-forming and re-valuing educational administration: Whence and when cometh the phoenix? Educational management and administration, 19(4), 200-217.
Greenfield, T. B.(1975). Theory about organization:A new perspective for schools. Administering educcation: International challenge, 71-99. London:Athone Press.
Gulley, F. S.(1999).Academic president as moral leader:James T. Laney at Emory University, 1977-1993. Retrieved November 04,2004,from: http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/preview/9926043
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R.(1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of applied Psychology, 60(2),159-170.
Henderson, J.G. & Hawthorne, R.D.(2000).Transformative curriculum leadership., 單文經總校閱、高新建等譯。革新的課程領導。台北:學富。
Herzberg , F.(1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland: World Press.
Hodgkinson, C.(1991).Educational leadership: The moral art. New York: State University of New York Press.
Hoppock , R.(1935). Job satisfaction. New York: Harper.
Hoy, W.K.,& Miskel, C.G.(1991). Education administration: Theory, research and practice.(4rd ED) New York: Random House.
Hoy, W.K.,& Miskel, C.G.(1982). Education administration: Theory, research and practice.(2rd ED) New York: Random House.
Hudson, J.(1997).Ethical leadership:The soul of policy making. In Journal of school Leadership.7(5),506-520.
Isherwood, G. B.(1995). Moral choice in administration. Education Canada, 35(2),36-41.
Judith, A. J.(2003).Education-The journey to moral leadership and moral
citizenship. Centre for Development of Teaching and Learning, 6(4),10-12.
Kam-cheung W.(1998).Culture and moral leadership in education. Peabody Journal of education, 73(2),106-125.
Lashway, L.(1996). Ethical leadership. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 463)
Leithwood, K. & Duck, D. L.(1999). A century’s quest to understand school leadership. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis(Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration(pp.45-72), San Franciso: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Lester, P. E.(1987). Development and factor analysis of the teacher job satisfaction questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 223-233.
Locke, E. A.(1969).What is job satisfaction?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 309-336。
Locke, E. A.(1976). The nature & causes of job satisfaction In M. D. Punnette(Ed.), Handbook of Individual & Organizational Psychology. 1297-1349. Chicago.
Lucas, N. J. (1999).Lives of integrity:Factors that influence moral transforming leaders. Retrieved November 04,2004,from:
http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/9945895
Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C.(1991).Educational administration: concepts and practices. California: Wadswortrh, Inc.
McCormick, E. J., & Ilgen, D. R.(1980). Industrial Psychology.(7th ed.)Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Maslow, A.H.(1970). Motivation and personality. New York:Harper and Row.
Maslow, A.H.(1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-390.
Mayo, E.(1933). The human problems of an Industrial civilization. New York: Macmillan.
Noddings, N.(2002). Educating moral people:A caring alternative to character education. New York: Teacher college, Columbia Univwrsity.
Noddings, N.(1995).Critical conversations in philosophy of education. New York:Routledge.
Padmakar, M.S. & Mridula D.R.(2001).Moral leadership in education:an Indian perspective. International Journal Leadership in Education,4(4),367-381.
Pagel, S. & Price, J.(1980). Serategies to alleviate teacher stress. Pointer, 24(2), 45-53。
Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E.E., Ⅲ.(1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, Ⅲ: Irwin.
Rinehart, J. S. & Short, P. M.(1993). Job satisfaction and empowerment among teacher leader, reading recovery teachers and regular classroom teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED362 940)
Robert, A. C.(2002).Presidential leadership-moral leadership in the new millennium. Featured Topic, 6-13.
Robbins, S. P.(2001). Organizational behavior 9th .Ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Robinson, C. & Bruce, R.(1997).Cultivating identity and moral leadership in medisting relationships: Critical hermeneutic analysis of African self-determination, economic development, and management education the second economies of Congo-Zaire, Zimbabwwe, and South Africa. Retrieved November 04,2004,from: http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/9806262
Seal, F. E. & Knight P. A.(1988). Industrial /organization psychology soience and practice. Belmount California:Books/Colepublishing CO..
Seashore, S.E., & Taber, T.D.(1975). Job satisfaction and their correlations. American Behavioral Scientist, 18(3),333-368.
Sergiovanni, T.J.(1995). The principalship: A practical response to the moral crisis in schools. London:The Falmer Press.
Sergiovanni , T. J.(1992). Moral leadership : getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Sergiovanni , T. J.(1990).Value-added leadership: Howto get extraordinary performance in schools. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Slater, R. O.(1994). Symbolic educational leadership and democracy in America. Educational administration Quarterly,30(1),97-101.
Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L.(1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chiicago: Rand McNally.
Strike, K. A., Haller, E. J. & Soltis, J. F.(1998). The ethics of school administration. New York:Teachers college press.
Starratt, R. J.(1994). Building an ethical school:A practical response to the moral crisis in schools. London:The Falmer Press.
Starrant, R. J.(1991).Building an ethical school: A theory for practice in educational leadership. In Educational administration quarterly, 27(2),185-202.
Taylor, F. W.(1911), Principles of Scientific Management, New York:Harper Brothers Publishing.
Vroom, V. H.(1967).Work and motivation. New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc.
Vroom, V. H.(1964).Work and motivation. New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc.
Wernimont, P.F.(1972). A system view of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 173-176.
Wheeless, L. R. Wheeless, V. E., & Howard, R. D.(1986). The relationships of communication with supervisor and decision participation to employee job satisfaction. Communication Quarterly, 32(3), 222-231.
Yukl,G.(2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
91911025
93
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091911025
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 林邦傑zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蘇美珍zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 蘇美珍zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned 25-Apr-2010 15:46:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 25-Apr-2010 15:46:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 25-Apr-2010 15:46:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0091911025en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/39152-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 學校行政碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91911025zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究的主要目的在瞭解(一)國民中學校長道德領導的現況;(二)國民中學兼任行政職務教師工作滿意現況;(三)不同背景變項對校長道德領導的差異;(四)不同背景變項對兼任行政職務教師工作滿意之差異;(五)國民中學校長道德領導與兼任行政職務教師工作滿意之相關情形;(六)國民中學校長道德領導與兼任行政職務教師背景變項對兼任行政職務教師工作滿意度是否具有預測功能。
研究採用問卷調查法,以桃園縣55所國民中學全體兼任行政職務教師為母群體,選取38校526位兼任行政職務教師為受試者,並以改編之「國民中學校長道德領導問卷」與「國民中學兼任行政職務教師工作滿意問卷」施測,計回收有效問卷465份,所得資料以SPSS/PC10.0統計套裝軟體進行統計分析,並透過描述統計、單因子變異數分析、Pearson積差相關分析、逐步多元迴歸等統計方法加以分析與解釋,所獲得主要結論如下:
一、 國民中學校長整體道德領導及各分層面(「道德領導問題」除外)皆屬中上程度。
二、 國民中學兼任行政職務教師因職位不同在覺知校長道德領導上有顯著差異。
三、 國民中學兼任行政職務教師工作滿意屬中上程度,其中在「人際關係」上最高,其次依序為「工作環境」、「主管領導」、「社會地位」、「工作本身」、「升遷考核」及「薪資福利」。
四、 國民中學兼任行政職務教師工作滿意因兼任行政年資之不同而有顯著差異。
五、 國民中學校長整體道德領導及各分層面,與兼任行政職務教師整體工作滿意及各分層面有顯著相關。
六、 在國民中學兼任行政職務教師工作滿意預測上,以「道德領導策略」最具預測力,其次依序為「道德領導問題」、「道德領導作法」、「職位」、「道德領導原因」、「道德領導功能」與「兼任行政職務年資」。
根據研究結果,對教育行政機關及校長提出建議如下:
一、 教育行政機關應建立道德倫理之校長培育及進修制度。
二、 教育行政機關應將道德領導納入校長遴選的指標。
三、 教育行政機關應訂定獎勵兼任行政職務教師之辦法。
四、 校長應利用各種機會充實自我的道德領導知能。
五、 校長應以學校整體利益為優先考量加強建構學校的倫理環境。
六、 校長應建立初任或資淺組長的輔導制度,並對兼任行政職務教師主動關懷、適時鼓勵。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The research on the relation between the moral leadership of junior high school principals and the job satisfaction of concurrently administrative teachers.

Abstract

The main purpose of this research is to analyze: (1)the current status of junior high school principals in the moral leadership; (2)the current status of the job satisfaction of junior high school concurrently administrative teachers; (3)the differences of different background variables to the principals’ moral leadership; (4) the differences of different background variables to the job satisfaction of concurrently administrative teachers; (5)related situations on the principals’ moral leaderships and job satisfaction of concurrently administrative teachers; (6)whether or not there is a predicting function of the principals’ moral leadership to concurrently administrative teachers’ job satisfaction within their different background variables.

This research conducts the survey study with concurrently administrative teachers from 55 junior high schools in Taoyuan County as a pool study. By randomly selecting 526 concurrently administrative teachers from 38 schools to be tested, they were given the revised versions of “the questionnaire of junior high school principals’ moral leadership” and “the questionnaire of junior high school concurrently administrative teachers’ job satisfaction”; end up with 465 valuable questionnaires and be detailed discussed. The obtained data carries on the statistical analysis by the SPSS/PC10.0 statistics software package and was analyzed and explained in advance by descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA analysis of variance, Pearson product-moment correlation analysis and multiple stepwise regression. The obtained conclusion as follows:

1. The whole of junior high school principals’ moral leadership and its each level (excluding the problem of the moral leadership) meets the middle upper level.
2. With the different job positions, concurrently administrative teachers have different perceptions on the principals’ moral leadership.
3. The job satisfaction of the concurrently administrative teachers meets the middle upper level. Among all, the personal relation is the highest and following by the job environment, supervisors’ lead, social status, job itself, promotion and evaluation, salary and benefits.
4. With different year services, concurrently administrative teachers have distinct job satisfaction.
5. There is obvious correlation between the whole of the principals’ moral leadership and its each level and the job satisfaction of the concurrently administrative teachers and its each level.
6. In talking about the prediction about the job satisfaction of the concurrently administrative teachers, the strategy of the moral leadership has the highest predicting, following by the problem of the moral leadership, the action of the moral leadership, job positions, the reason of the moral leadership, the function of the moral leadership and the year services as concurrently administrative teachers.

According to the research result, it suggests to the government institution of education and school principals as follows:
1. The government institution of education should establish moral leadership to train up school principals and for them to take advanced courses.
2. The government institution of education should include moral leadership in the index of selecting principals.
3. The government institution of education should specify rewards for concurrently administrative teachers.
4. School principals should take every advantage to enrich self-knowledge in moral leadership.
5. School principals should take the whole benefit of schools as the priority consideration to strength up the moral environment of schools.
6. School principals should establish counseling system to those concurrently administrative teachers who are fresh or junior in the service and actively concern concurrently administrative teachers and encourage them in proper time.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與目的…………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究問題…………………………………………………… 6
第三節 名詞解釋…………………………………………………… 9
第四節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………………11
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 道德領導理論和相關研究…………………………………13
第二節 工作滿意理論和相關研究…………………………………43
第三節 校長道德領導與教師工作滿意相關研究…………………72
第三章 研究設計與實施
第一節 研究架構……………………………………………………78
第二節 研究對象……………………………………………………80
第三節 研究工具……………………………………………………82
第四節 實施程序……………………………………………………89
第五節 資料處理……………………………………………………90
第四章 研究結果分析與討論
第一節 樣本特性分析………………………………………………91
第二節 國民中學校長道德領導之現況……………………………93
第三節 國民中學兼任行政職務教師工作滿意之現況…………105
第四節 國民中學校長道德領導與兼任行政職務教師工作滿意
之關係……………………………………………………118
第五節 國民中學校長道德領導、兼任行政職務教師背景變項
與工作滿意之迴歸分析…………………………………123
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 結論………………………………………………………135
第二節 建議………………………………………………………141
參考文獻
中文部份……………………………………………………………147
西文部份……………………………………………………………154
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 43823 bytes-
dc.format.extent 79116 bytes-
dc.format.extent 119584 bytes-
dc.format.extent 94684 bytes-
dc.format.extent 202274 bytes-
dc.format.extent 562964 bytes-
dc.format.extent 233043 bytes-
dc.format.extent 659123 bytes-
dc.format.extent 185480 bytes-
dc.format.extent 176963 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091911025en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 領導zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 道德領導zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 工作滿意zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) leadershipen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) moral leadershipen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) job satisfactionen_US
dc.title (題名) 國民中學校長道德領導與兼任行政職務教師工作滿意關係之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 壹、 中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 朱淑子(2002)。國小校長轉化領導、互易領導與教師工作滿意關係之研究。台東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 任晟蓀(1981)。國中校長領導型式輔導教師教育背景對輔導教師工作滿足之影響。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李安明(2003)。析論二十世紀末(1985-1995)學校領導理論之發展。教育研究月刊,111,49-66。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李富美(1998)。校長角色與學校效能之研究—一所國民小學之觀察。國立台東師範學院初等教育學系研究所,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳清山,黃旭鈞(1999)。「教育人員專業倫理準則」初步建構。載於教育行政論壇第四次研討會會議手冊,169-189。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳清山,林天佑(2002)。道德領導。教育研究月刊,98,144。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳清基(1980)。國民中學組織結構與較師工作滿意之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 何東日(2003)。品格教育何在?。中央日報全民論壇( 2003年11月24日)。2003年12月20日取自http://www.cdn.com.tw/daily/2003/11/24/text/921124i6.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林火旺(2004)。倫理學。台北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林明地(2000)。校長領導的影響:近三十年來研究結果的分析。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,2(2),232-254。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林明地(1999)。重建學校領導的倫理學觀念。教育政策論壇,2(2),129-157。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林純雯(2002a)。學校行政的危機是技術與詩意的衝突。學校行政雙月刊,19,139-148。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林純雯(2002b)。學校行政領導的倫理學觀點。中等教育雙月刊,19,139-148。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林純雯(2001a)。國民中學校長道德領導之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林純雯(2001b)。道德領導—學校行政領導的新面向。中等教育,52(4),110-127。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林新發(1983)。五專校長領導方式與教師工作滿意關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 范熾文(2002)。學校行政原理。台北:師大書苑。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 范熾文(2001)。學校領導的倫理議題—以關懷倫理為例。中等教育,52(5),162-175。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 范熾文(2000)。學校行政決定的革新趨向:倫理決定。學校行政雙月刊,8,55-67。 中華民國學校行政研究學會主編。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 施鵬程(2003)。學習行組織的核心價值與道德領導。人事月刊,36(6),49-56。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 秦夢群(2003)。教育行政—理論部份。台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 秦夢群(1983)。教育行政理論與應用(初版)。台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 秦夢群、黃貞裕(2001)。教育行政研究方法論。台北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梁丁財(2002)。國民小學校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳月紅(1989)。台北市國民中學家政科教師之工作滿意。國立台灣師範大學家正教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳秋容(2001)。國民小學校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意關係之研究—以台灣北部五縣市為例。國立新竹師範學院碩士論文,未出版,新竹。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳俊雄(2000)。全球倫理,道德教育的加強和重建。師說,175,49-50。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 章珮瑜(2000)。學校文化與教師組織承諾及工作滿意關係之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張明輝(1998)。校園民主應否「戒急用忍」?—中小學學校自主改革成效初探,載於高強華、楊思偉主編,鬆與綁的再反省,224-256。台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張鳳燕(2002)。校長領導的道德責任。國教天地,148,41-46zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張憲庭(2003)。從倫理觀點探討國民小學校長道德與價值領導。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許士軍(1977)。工作滿足、個人特徵與組織氣候—文獻探討及實證研究。政大學報,35,13-56。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許川濠(1998)。台北市國民小學組織溝通行為與教師工作滿意關係之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 舒緒緯(1990)。國民小學教師溝通滿意與工作滿意關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃乃熒(2004)。後現代學校行政倫理及其兩難困境之解決。教育研究集刊,50(3),1-29。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃乃熒(2001)。教育決策的正當性:決策倫理及典範的討論。載於師大學報教育類,46(1),1-19。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃乃熒(2000)。後現代教育的行政哲學。台北:師大書苑。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃乃熒(1995)。脈絡領導與學校行政創意及倫理的探討。中學教育學報,2,1-39。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃婉婷(2003)。國民小學校長倫理取向與教師工作滿意之相關研究。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃敏榮(2003)。高級中學行政兼職教師角色壓力、社會支持與工作滿意關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃隆民(1985)。國民中學教師角色衝突與工作滿意之關係。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃德祥、謝龍卿(2004)。品格與道德教育的內涵與實施。教育研究月刊,120(4),35-43。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃錦樟(2000)。傳統文化與道德領導:傳統道德領導能否取代西方理論成為東亞地區學校領導的範式?新世紀教育發展與規劃學術研討會論文。國立台灣師範大學教育學系主辦,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 游淑惠(2003)。國小校長魅力領導與教師組織承諾及工作滿意之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 游肇賢(2003)。國中兼任行政工作教師角色衝突與工作滿意之調查研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉子超(2000)。道德領導在國民中小學教育之運用。學校行政雙月刊,23-29。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊煥烘(1988)。國小校長領導型式與教師成熟度之配合對教師工作滿意及組織效能認知的影響。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄒浮安(1982)。我國高級職業學校教師工作滿意程度及其影響因素之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 廖裕月(1998)。國小校長轉化領導型式與領導效能之研究—以北部四縣市為例。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡培村(1985)。國民中小學校長的領導特質、權力基礎、學校組織結構及組織氣候與教師工作滿足關係之比較研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡淑苓(1990)。幼稚園園長領導型式與教師工作滿意之關係。國立台灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡進雄(2003)。論校長如何展現倫理領導。人文及社會學科教育通訊,14(1),25-36。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭彩鳳(2001)。教育改革中校長工作滿意校長效能與學校效能之研究:國小校長之訪談研究。教育學刊,17,167。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 閻自安(2000)。台灣地區國民小學學校本位決策與校長領導方式教師工作滿意度之關係研究。國立政治大學教育學系研究所博士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝文全(2004)。教育行政學。台北:高等教育。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝文全(1998)。道德領導—學校行政領導的另一扇窗。載於林玉體主編跨世紀的教育演變。台北:文景。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝文全(1990)。教育行政—理論與實務。台北:文景。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝文全(1976)。中華民國與愛荷華州校長領導型態與教師工作滿意關係之比較研究。美國愛荷華州大學博士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝月香(2003)。國民小學教師兼任行政職務工作滿意度之研究。國立花蓮師範學院教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝金青(1992)。國民小學行政兼職教師角色衝突與工作滿意程度之研究。國立台灣師範阿學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝美慧(2000)。新世紀教育行政領導理念—後現代領導。學校行政雙月刊,9,64-75。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝龍卿(2004)。品格與道德教育的內涵與實施。教育研究月刊,120,35-43。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 韓繼成(2002)。國民中學訓導人員角色壓力、人格特質與工作滿意度的關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顏童文(2002)。中部四縣市國民小學校長道德領導之研究。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 簡成熙(2004)。道德教育的進行:傳統、現代與後現代的省思。基礎教育學報,13(1),81-95。(Journal of basic education,13(1). The Chinese University of Hong Kong 2004)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 羅明忠(2003)。台中市國民小學校長領導行為與教師工作滿意度相關之研究。台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇進棻(1991)。國民中小學校長角色衝突與工作滿意關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 饒安邦(1991)。台北市國小教師行政兼職與工作滿意之啟示。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 貳、 西文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Adams, J.S.(1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abcdrmal and Social Psychology. 67, 422-436.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Adams, J.S.(1972). Toward an understanding of inequity. In G. A. Yukl & K. N. Wexley, Reading in organization and industrial psychology. London:Oxford University Press, 194-210.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alderfer, C. P.(1972). Existence, relatendness, and growth. New York: Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anello, E. & Hernandez, J.B.(1996).Moral leadership. Santa Cruz, Bolivia: Universidad Nur.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bates, R.(1993). On knowing: Cultural and critical approaches to educational administration. Educational Management and Administration, 21(3), 171-176.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Beck, L. G.(1994). Reclaiming educational administration as caring profession. New York:Teachers college, Columbia university.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Beck, L. G. & Murphy, J.(1994).Ethics in educational leadership programs: An expanding role. California: Corwin Press, INC.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Begley, P. T. & Leonard, P. E.(1999).The values of educational administration. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bottery, M.(1993).The ethics of educational management:Personal, social and political perspective on school organization. New York:Gassell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burns, J.(1978).Leadership. New York:Harper and Row.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Coppola, D. L.(1998).Moral leadership:A proposed theory illustrated by select Catholic secondary school principals. Retrieved November 04,2004,from: http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/9839504zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Davis, A. J.(2002).Principles and Prospects for the development of MPI. Journal of Macao Polytechnic Institute. 1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dessler, G.(1980). Human behavior improving performance at work. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Farrell, D. J.(1978). A causal model of job satisfaction. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1, 4339-A.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gibson, J. L., J. M. Ivancevich, & J. M. Donnelly,(1991). Organization: behavior, structure, Precess, Richard. D Irwin, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gilligan, C.(1982).In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, Mass. Havard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Getzels, J. w., Lipham, J. M. & Campbell, R. F.(1968). Educational administration as a social process, New York:Harper & Row Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Greenfield, W.D.(1993).Articulating values and ethics in administrator preparation. Educational administration in a pluralistic society, 267-287. Albany, New York:SUNY Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Greenfield, T.(1991). Re-forming and re-valuing educational administration: Whence and when cometh the phoenix? Educational management and administration, 19(4), 200-217.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Greenfield, T. B.(1975). Theory about organization:A new perspective for schools. Administering educcation: International challenge, 71-99. London:Athone Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gulley, F. S.(1999).Academic president as moral leader:James T. Laney at Emory University, 1977-1993. Retrieved November 04,2004,from: http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/preview/9926043zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R.(1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of applied Psychology, 60(2),159-170.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Henderson, J.G. & Hawthorne, R.D.(2000).Transformative curriculum leadership., 單文經總校閱、高新建等譯。革新的課程領導。台北:學富。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Herzberg , F.(1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland: World Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hodgkinson, C.(1991).Educational leadership: The moral art. New York: State University of New York Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hoppock , R.(1935). Job satisfaction. New York: Harper.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hoy, W.K.,& Miskel, C.G.(1991). Education administration: Theory, research and practice.(4rd ED) New York: Random House.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hoy, W.K.,& Miskel, C.G.(1982). Education administration: Theory, research and practice.(2rd ED) New York: Random House.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hudson, J.(1997).Ethical leadership:The soul of policy making. In Journal of school Leadership.7(5),506-520.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Isherwood, G. B.(1995). Moral choice in administration. Education Canada, 35(2),36-41.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Judith, A. J.(2003).Education-The journey to moral leadership and moralzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) citizenship. Centre for Development of Teaching and Learning, 6(4),10-12.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kam-cheung W.(1998).Culture and moral leadership in education. Peabody Journal of education, 73(2),106-125.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lashway, L.(1996). Ethical leadership. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 463)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Leithwood, K. & Duck, D. L.(1999). A century’s quest to understand school leadership. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis(Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration(pp.45-72), San Franciso: Jossey-Bass Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lester, P. E.(1987). Development and factor analysis of the teacher job satisfaction questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 223-233.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Locke, E. A.(1969).What is job satisfaction?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 309-336。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Locke, E. A.(1976). The nature & causes of job satisfaction In M. D. Punnette(Ed.), Handbook of Individual & Organizational Psychology. 1297-1349. Chicago.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lucas, N. J. (1999).Lives of integrity:Factors that influence moral transforming leaders. Retrieved November 04,2004,from:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/9945895zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C.(1991).Educational administration: concepts and practices. California: Wadswortrh, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCormick, E. J., & Ilgen, D. R.(1980). Industrial Psychology.(7th ed.)Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Maslow, A.H.(1970). Motivation and personality. New York:Harper and Row.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Maslow, A.H.(1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-390.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mayo, E.(1933). The human problems of an Industrial civilization. New York: Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Noddings, N.(2002). Educating moral people:A caring alternative to character education. New York: Teacher college, Columbia Univwrsity.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Noddings, N.(1995).Critical conversations in philosophy of education. New York:Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Padmakar, M.S. & Mridula D.R.(2001).Moral leadership in education:an Indian perspective. International Journal Leadership in Education,4(4),367-381.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pagel, S. & Price, J.(1980). Serategies to alleviate teacher stress. Pointer, 24(2), 45-53。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E.E., Ⅲ.(1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, Ⅲ: Irwin.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rinehart, J. S. & Short, P. M.(1993). Job satisfaction and empowerment among teacher leader, reading recovery teachers and regular classroom teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED362 940)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Robert, A. C.(2002).Presidential leadership-moral leadership in the new millennium. Featured Topic, 6-13.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Robbins, S. P.(2001). Organizational behavior 9th .Ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Robinson, C. & Bruce, R.(1997).Cultivating identity and moral leadership in medisting relationships: Critical hermeneutic analysis of African self-determination, economic development, and management education the second economies of Congo-Zaire, Zimbabwwe, and South Africa. Retrieved November 04,2004,from: http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/9806262zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Seal, F. E. & Knight P. A.(1988). Industrial /organization psychology soience and practice. Belmount California:Books/Colepublishing CO..zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Seashore, S.E., & Taber, T.D.(1975). Job satisfaction and their correlations. American Behavioral Scientist, 18(3),333-368.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sergiovanni, T.J.(1995). The principalship: A practical response to the moral crisis in schools. London:The Falmer Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sergiovanni , T. J.(1992). Moral leadership : getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sergiovanni , T. J.(1990).Value-added leadership: Howto get extraordinary performance in schools. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Slater, R. O.(1994). Symbolic educational leadership and democracy in America. Educational administration Quarterly,30(1),97-101.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L.(1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chiicago: Rand McNally.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Strike, K. A., Haller, E. J. & Soltis, J. F.(1998). The ethics of school administration. New York:Teachers college press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Starratt, R. J.(1994). Building an ethical school:A practical response to the moral crisis in schools. London:The Falmer Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Starrant, R. J.(1991).Building an ethical school: A theory for practice in educational leadership. In Educational administration quarterly, 27(2),185-202.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Taylor, F. W.(1911), Principles of Scientific Management, New York:Harper Brothers Publishing.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vroom, V. H.(1967).Work and motivation. New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vroom, V. H.(1964).Work and motivation. New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wernimont, P.F.(1972). A system view of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 173-176.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wheeless, L. R. Wheeless, V. E., & Howard, R. D.(1986). The relationships of communication with supervisor and decision participation to employee job satisfaction. Communication Quarterly, 32(3), 222-231.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yukl,G.(2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.zh_TW