Publications-Research Reports

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 低放射性廢棄物最終處置設施候選場址地方公投之研究
作者 湯京平;杜文苓;林震洋;范玫芳;蔡瑄庭
貢獻者 行政院原子能委員會
國立政治大學;國立政治大學政治學系
關鍵詞 公投;低放射性廢棄物;處置;候選場址;公共行政;政治學
日期 2009
上傳時間 21-Jul-2010 16:14:30 (UTC+8)
摘要 我國核廢料處理在「低放射性廢棄物最終處置設施場址設置條例」(以下簡稱「場址條例」)通過、引進公投機制之後,進入一個新的時代。以往被質疑為黑箱作業的選址流程,現在則因為公投的實施,而給予地方居民參與決策的正式管道。居民參與誠為解決鄰避設施爭議的重要原則,但公投同樣可能成為政治人物操弄民粹的利器。此外,我國不但剛頒訂「場址條例」,以往也未有地方公投的實施經驗,故選址過程所涉及之不同法律體系間的競合關係,也尚待釐清。因此本研究希望透過法條解析、跨國比較研究、以及地方政治生態等面向的調查,為順利完成具公信力的高品質地方公投,提供細部制度規劃與實施策略的政策建議,不但解決選址的爭議,也為我國審議式民主的實施,樹立典範。 It has been a new epoch for the siting gridlock in Taiwan since the introduction of the plebiscite in the administration procedure by the newly enacted “Regulations for the Siting of the Low-Level Radiation Waste Repository” (hereafter the “Siting Act”) in 2006. Although public participation has widely been recognized as a core principle to manage Not-in-my-back-yard syndrome, tools like plebiscite are also notorious for their populist effects associated with political manipulation. This study therefore aims at controlling negative effects of the plebiscite and streamlining the procedure by analyzing the conflicts of germane regulations, investigating local political ecology, and comparing similar experiences abroad. The study will offer practice suggestions on institutional fine-tuning and strategic choices for policy implementation
關聯 97FCMA010
應用研究
委託研究
研究期間: 9710~9806
研究經費: 750 千元
資料類型 report
dc.contributor 行政院原子能委員會en_US
dc.contributor 國立政治大學;國立政治大學政治學系en_US
dc.creator (作者) 湯京平;杜文苓;林震洋;范玫芳;蔡瑄庭zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 21-Jul-2010 16:14:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 21-Jul-2010 16:14:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 21-Jul-2010 16:14:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/43241-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 我國核廢料處理在「低放射性廢棄物最終處置設施場址設置條例」(以下簡稱「場址條例」)通過、引進公投機制之後,進入一個新的時代。以往被質疑為黑箱作業的選址流程,現在則因為公投的實施,而給予地方居民參與決策的正式管道。居民參與誠為解決鄰避設施爭議的重要原則,但公投同樣可能成為政治人物操弄民粹的利器。此外,我國不但剛頒訂「場址條例」,以往也未有地方公投的實施經驗,故選址過程所涉及之不同法律體系間的競合關係,也尚待釐清。因此本研究希望透過法條解析、跨國比較研究、以及地方政治生態等面向的調查,為順利完成具公信力的高品質地方公投,提供細部制度規劃與實施策略的政策建議,不但解決選址的爭議,也為我國審議式民主的實施,樹立典範。 It has been a new epoch for the siting gridlock in Taiwan since the introduction of the plebiscite in the administration procedure by the newly enacted “Regulations for the Siting of the Low-Level Radiation Waste Repository” (hereafter the “Siting Act”) in 2006. Although public participation has widely been recognized as a core principle to manage Not-in-my-back-yard syndrome, tools like plebiscite are also notorious for their populist effects associated with political manipulation. This study therefore aims at controlling negative effects of the plebiscite and streamlining the procedure by analyzing the conflicts of germane regulations, investigating local political ecology, and comparing similar experiences abroad. The study will offer practice suggestions on institutional fine-tuning and strategic choices for policy implementationen_US
dc.format application/pdfen_US
dc.format.extent 1160030 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language zh-Twen_US
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) 97FCMA010en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 應用研究en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 委託研究en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 研究期間: 9710~9806en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 研究經費: 750 千元en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公投;低放射性廢棄物;處置;候選場址;公共行政;政治學en_US
dc.title (題名) 低放射性廢棄物最終處置設施候選場址地方公投之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) reporten