報業組織溝通與競爭分析--以中國時報為例

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

html(289)

Publication Export

Google Scholar^TM

題名	報業組織溝通與競爭分析--以中國時報為例 The organizational behavior and competitive analysis:case study of China Times
作者	楊秀娟
貢獻者	王石番楊秀娟
關鍵詞	組織溝通競爭力中國時報論述理論拉克勞報業組織 organizational behavior competitive advantage China Times Discourse theory Laclau The press
日期	2009
上傳時間	8-Dec-2010 01:51:29 (UTC+8)
摘要	面臨嚴峻的商業競爭，報業老闆對新聞事業的想像或認知，關乎競爭策略的擬定，競爭策略是否能獲得新聞記者的認同，是報業組織溝通的重要課題，它不但牽涉到報紙生產商品、新聞的內涵，也影響組織整體戰力或競爭力的發揮。本論文以2008年易主後的《中國時報》為個案研究，探討報紙的組織溝通與其競爭力間的關連。雖說是關連性的分析，但本文未採量化分析，而是著重如何「理解」組織上下層溝通與其競爭力之間的關係。本文採用拉克勞（Laclau & Mouffe）的論述理論（Discourse Theory）架構來觀察組織上下層的溝通行為。溝通是一種語言符號的串連與建構，新聞事業具雙重特質，每日生產的新聞不但與文化、政治領域息息相關，同時也是典型的消費商品。作為一個商業組織，報紙每日面對生存競爭論述，新經營者亟思競爭優勢之建立，另一方面記者這一行也有其歷史形構的新聞專業論述，當這些論述與新的領導者蔡衍明先生相遇，會產生何種溝通樣貌？研究發現蔡衍明先生因米果事業在中國發跡致富，報紙對他而言是個全新的事業體。他對新聞的認知或想像，與上述的新聞專業論述有不小差距，這些差距在組織溝通上產生不少衝撞，致使組織的穩定度不佳，競爭力發揮有限。如果說組織是一個語言符號的結構體，那麼新中國時報的組織體仍處於一種不完整的、有缺口的半結構狀態，從論述理論的架構而言，就是上下層的組織溝通過程中，始終未產生一強而有力的主導論述，以縫合這缺口。本研究之結論顯示當組織內的論述仍處於衝撞不穩定狀態時，其產出之商品難以建立差異化特色，競爭優勢亦難以建立。 This thesis presents a theoretical model to address the communication behavior and competitive strategy issues in the newspaper industry, where technological changes have greatly increased the scope of competition. Newspaper companies are being confronted with market changes that are destablising successful mature markets, undermining long-term relationships with readers and advertisers, and threatening the sustainability of their business models. The pace of these changes is extraordinary, forcing managers, shareholders, and employees to scramble to comprehend the changes, to develop strategic responses, and to reorganize their activities. The thesis starts with the case of China Times Daily, which used to be one of the biggest newspapers in Taiwan but sold, in the end of 2008, to a successful businessman of rice cracker, Tsai Eng-Meng. Tsai Eng-Meng, now 53, runs the biggest snack empire in China. Want Want China is now unrivaled in the country’s rice cracker market. It’s not unusual for powerful businesspeople looking to ensure a public outlet for their views to invest in the media. The question is how Tsai Eng-Meng, as the latest entrant into the media market, can manage the newspaper as successful as his cracker business. In divided Taiwan, where pro-China and anti-China groups can’t agree on much, Tsai’s purchase of the China Times sparked worries about free speech in the society and inside China Times as well. Tsai Eng-Meng does not have an experience or knowledge base of how to operate the press. The employees he needs to communicate with or he needs to “understand” mostly are the reporters with expertise in news industry. They highly praise the values of free speech and impartial reports. These values can be regarded as the most important discourse evolving from the press history. With the analytical framework of Laclau and Mouffe’s Discourse Theory, the communication between Tsai Eng-Meng and the reporters is not smooth. Some events occurring in the first year of Tsai’s management reveals that the confrontation between Tsai and the news department is so harsh that even diminishes competitive advantages of the company. Since the communication behavior in China Times remains unstable, there is not possible to bring a dominant discourse in the organization, which will lead to a bad performance in ways of public opinion and the circulation.
參考文獻	中文文獻  刁曼蓬、游常山（1997）。第一大報，金子打造：三大報經營爭霸戰。天下雜誌，7，60-78。  王石番（1990）。傳播內容分析法：理論與實證。台北：幼獅。  王洪鈞（1991）。大眾傳播與現代社會。台北：正中。  王雲怡（2001）。狗仔隊旋風八卦狂潮，亞洲週刊，15 期，24。  尤子彥、林瑩秋、陳鳳英（2008）。中國時報易主了。商業週刊，1094。  司徒達賢（2005）。管理學的新世界。台北：天下遠見出版股份有限公司。  李金銓、蘇鑰機、陳文（1999，1月4日）。九十年代傳媒可信度的變遷。明報，頁E9。  李金銓、蘇鑰機、馮應謙（1996，2月5日）。新聞工作者如何看報紙可信度〉，明報。  何榮幸、邱奕嵩、聞學潔、李淨瑜（2001）。狗仔惡戰，目擊者，23。  吳燕玲（2002）。不可忽視的媒體人─黎智英，新新聞，774，19-20。  Morsy, Z. (1984). Preface. In Z. Morsy (Ed.), Media education, pp. 5-12, Paris: UNESCO.  Merrill, J. (1989). The dialect in journalism. LA: Louisiana State University Press.  Mcmanus, J. (1994).Market-Driven Journalism. Sage Publication.  Mishler, Elliot G. Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986)  Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.  Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.  Porter, M.E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.  Pippert, W. (1988). An ethics of news. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.  Picard, R.G. (1996). “The rise and fall of communication empires,” The Journal of Media Economics, 9(4), 23-40.  Picard, R.G. & Rimmer, T. (1999). “Weathering a recession: Effects of size and diversification on newspaper companies," The Journal of Media Economics 12(1),1-18.  李筱雯（2004）。好新聞？好生意？台灣報業生產政治的轉變。政治大學新聞學研究所碩士論文。  Picard, R. G. (2000). “Audience fragmentation and sructural limits on media innovation and diversity,” pp. 180-191 in Jan van Cuilenburg and Richard van der Wurff, eds. Media and Open Societies: Cultural, Economic and Policy Foundations for Media Openness and Diversity in East and West.  Picard, R. G. (2001). “Expansion and limits in EU television markets: Audience, advertising, and competition issues,” Discussion Papers C2/2001, Business Research and Development Centre, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration.  Picard, R.G. (2002). The economics and financing of media Companies. New York: Fordham University Press.  Picard, R.G. (2003). “Cash cows or entrecôte: Publishing companies and new technologies”.Trends in Communication, 11(2), 127-136.  Phillips, B.K. (2000). “Rethinking competitive strategies in the American trade-book Industry,” Competitiveness Review 10(2), 65-79.  Philip Meyer (2004).The vanishing newspaper: Saving journalism in the information age. University of Missouri Press.  Searl, J. R., (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. The free press.  Butler, J., Laclau, E., & Zizek S. (2000). Contingence, Hegemony, Universality. Verso, London.  Schiller, H. (1989). Culture, Inc.: The corporate takeover of public expression.New York: Oxford University Press.  Stephen D. Cooper (2006). Watching the watchdog: Bloggers as the fifth estate. Marquette Books.  李欣（2008）。“旺旺之父”蔡衍明傳奇，2008年11月3日，取自http://hk.huaxia.com/tslj/rdrw/2008/11/1209049.html  Scott Gant (2007).We’re All Journalists Now: The transformation of the press and reshaping of the law in the internet age, Free Press.  Torfing, J. (1999). New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek. Balckwell, UK.  Underwood, D. (1993). When MBAs rule the newsroom. New York: Columbia University Press.  Vines, S. (1999). Hong Kong: China』s New Colony, London: Orion Business Books.  Wacks, R. (1992). The right to privacy in civil liberties in Hong Kong, in Wacks, R. (ed.).Civil liberties in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.  Wesley-Smith, P. (1993). An introduction to the Hong Kong legal system. (2nd Ed.). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.  Yong Liu, (2002). Essays on competitive strategies in the broadcasting television industry. University of British Columbia.  林思平（2008）。通俗新聞：文化研究的觀點。台北：五南。  林宜諄（2001）。下流不是他成功的唯一理由，數位時代，23 期，226-230。  林麗雲（2002）。台灣威權政體下「侍從報業」的矛盾與轉型：1949 – 1999，台灣產業研究，3，89-148。  林倖妃（2009）。他們怎麼賣新聞。天下雜誌，32- 40。  施威全（2003）。誰會歡迎狗仔隊。蘋果日報，論壇版。  韋思曼（2003）。蘋果日報能紅多久。動腦雜誌，326 。  胡七玲（2003）。蘋果顛覆記者新聞認知。銘報即時新聞。  翁秀琪（1992）。大眾傳播理論與實證。台北：三民。  徐聯恩（1996）。企業變革系列研究。台北：華泰書局。  徐毓莉（2002）。組織變革對新聞室成員態度之影響 – 中時報系個案研究，銘傳大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。  梁偉賢（1996）。香港新聞道德專業化的面貌。「邁向21世紀兩岸三地傳播媒介研討會」論文。香港，頁23-24。  張文強（1997）。新聞專業與商業邏輯的矛盾–企管與新聞訓練對報業經營認知的影響，民意研究季刊，202，87 – 112。  張文強（1998）。報紙產業組織結構分析與再形塑–組織理論的觀點，新聞學研究，57，191 – 211。  張錦華（2001）。傳播批判理論。台北：黎明文化。  范碧珍（2001）。狗仔一出、誰與爭鋒？壹週刊改變台灣媒體生態？，突破，192， 80-83。  彭明輝（2001）。中文報業王國的興起：王惕吾與聯合報系。北縣﹕稻鄉。  黃毅峰（2001）。狗仔既出，媒體爭鋒，新經濟，10， 14-18。  辜曉進（2004）。走進美國大報–探索媒體競爭利的第一現場報導。台北：左岸文化。  黎晶晶、楊沛文、劉志明（2001）。網路教父收山狗仔大亨來了！，商業週刊，693，50-55。  劉仲冬（1996）。量與質社會研究的爭議及社會研究未來的走向及出路，胡幼慧(編)，質性研究 - 理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，頁121- 139。台北：巨流。  劉萍（2002）黎智英亂台，今週刊，329。  郭力昕（2002）。壹週刊與台灣媒體文化的轉向，誠品好讀，18，20。  陸燕玲（2002）。從「名門正派」到明教教徒﹖- 台灣「壹周刊」新聞工作者的調適與認同。台灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。  陳雪彗（1993）。台灣報社的生產政治：一個腦力勞動控制的研究。台灣大學社會研究所碩士論文。  陳炳宏（2001）。媒體服務本質與產權規範：從有線廣播電視法修法趨勢看傳播媒體的角色。廣播與電視，2，29-51。  陳楚孟（2002）。從報紙煽色腥新聞內容探討報業企業社會責任之研究。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。  陳延升（2003）。蘋果vs.臺灣三大報，180天攻防。數位時代，55期。  陳順孝（2004）。善用「小報」創意、開展「大報」新局。台北：行政院新聞局。  陳宗逸（2008）。自由打敗中時十五年復仇記。新台灣新聞週刊，640。  陳志平（2009，2，11）。金溥聰不跟馬英九跟黎智英，不入閣、不入府、入電視台。聯合晚報。  楊孝濚（1989）。社會及行為科學研究法。台北：東華書局。  蔡衍明（2008）。給中時員工的一封信。  張榮哲（1995）。〈遭逢異己：拉克勞與慕芙的霸權與社會主義戰略〉，《當代》105期書評。  羅文輝、張黎文（1996）。臺灣新聞人員的專業倫理：1994年的調查分析。「傳播與經濟發展研討會」論文。香港，頁2-5。  譚士屏（2001）。台灣報紙產品市場競爭行為分析：1988 - 1999。政治大學新聞學研究所碩士論文。  嚴菲妤（2002）。黎智英將帶來「蛋塔」效應？，商業新聞，11， 22-25。  閻紀宇 (2009，2，5)。摳成本救報業？網路收費是王道。中時電子報。  蘇鑰機（1996）。完全市場導向新聞學：《蘋果日報》個案研究。「傳播與經濟發展研討會」論文，香港，頁2-5。  蘇鑰機（1997）。完全市場導向新聞學：蘋果日報個案研究，陳文、朱立、潘忠黨（編），大眾傳播與市場經濟。香港：爐峰學會。15-23。  蘇蘅（2002）。競爭時代的報紙–理論與實務。台北：時英。  Curran, James.（1985）.Power without responsibility：the press and broadcasting in Britain. London；New York：Methuen. 魏玓、劉昌德 (譯)（2001）。有權無責：英國的報紙與廣電媒體，台北：編譯館。  Giddens, Anthony. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age。趙旭東、方文（譯）（2005）。現代性與自我認同，台北：左岸文化。  Peter F. Drucker. (1995) Innovation and Entrepreneurship:Practice and Principles.蕭富峰、李田樹（譯）（1998）。創新與創業精神，台北：麥田。  Picard, Robert G（1989）. Media economics：concepts and issues. Newbury Park, Calif.：Sage, 馮建三（譯）（1994）。媒介經濟學，台北：遠流。  Robert Bobcock。張君玫（譯）（1999）。消費。台北：巨流。  Frank Webster。馮建三（譯）（1999）。資訊社會理論。台北：遠流。  McQuail,Denis.（2000,McQuail`s mass communication theory. London； Thousand Oaks，Calif.：Sage Publications. 陳芸芸、劉慧雯（譯）（2001）。最新大眾傳播理論(上下冊)，台北：韋伯文化。  中研院社會所（2003）。台灣社會變遷基本調查。  維基百科（2006）。台灣報業發展與沿革，2008年9月25日，取自http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E8%87%AA%E7%94%B1%E6%99%82%E5%A0%B1&variant=zh-tw  Philip Meyer (2007).The vanishing newspaper. 張衛平（譯）正在消失的報紙 : 如何拯救信息時代的新聞業。  陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究﹐台北﹕五南。英文文獻  Altschull, J. (1984). Agents of power. New York: Longman.  Breed, Warran. (1955). Social control in the newsroom. Social Force, 33,323 – 325.  Baudrillard, Jean (1988). Jean baudrillard: Selected writings. Ed. Mark Poster.Stanford: Stanford UP.  Barker, L. (1990).Communication (5th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.  Bagdikian, B. (1992). The media monopoly (4th Ed.). Boston: Beacon Press.  Bagdikian, B.H. (1997). The media monopoly. 5th ed. Boston：Beacon Press.  Baudrillard, Jean (1993). Jean baudrillard live: Selected interviews. Ed. Mike Gane.London: Routledge.  Bird, Elizabeth S. (1998). Tabloid Tales – Global Debates over Media Standards. Colin Sparks & John Tulloch (eds.), Audience Demands in a Murderous Market﹕Tabloidization in U.S. Television News (213 – 228). USA﹕Rowman&Littlefield Publishers, Inc.  Bill Kovach & Tom Rosenstiel (2001). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. Three Rivers Press.  Collins, J.C. (1994).Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. Harvard Business.  Cronin, M. and Mcpherson, J. (1995) Pronouncements and denunciations: An analysis of state press association ethics codes from the 1920s`, Jouranlism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 890-901.  Chung, T.Y. (1995). Surveys on media performance and freedom of speech: Summary report. Hong Kong: Social Sciences Research Center of the University of Hong Kong, Radio Television Hong Kong, and Hong Kong Journalism Association.  Clayton Christensen and Michael E. Raynor (2003). The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth, Harvard business school press.  Cohen, C.J. (1999). The boundaries of blackness: AIDS and the breakdown of black politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  David Morley and Kuan-Hsin Chen. (1996). Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies .New York: Routledge.  Dahlgren, P. (1991). Television and the public sphere: Citizenship, democracy and the media. London: Sage Publications.  Denton, Frank (1993).Old newspaper and new realities﹕The promise of the marketing of Journalism. USA﹕A Twentieth Century Fund, Inc.  Downie, Leonard Jr. & Kaiser，Robert G (2002).The news about the news：American journalism in peril. USA：Random House, Inc.  Engwall, Lars (1978).Newspaper as organizations. Farnborough, Hants︰Saxon House.  Engwall, Lars (1986).Newspaper adaptation to a changing social environment：A case study of organizational drift as a response to resource dependence. European Journal of Communication.Vol.1, 327-341.  Eckman, Alyssa & Lindl of Thomas (2003). Negotiating the gray lines：An ethnographic case study of organizational conflict between advertorials and news. Journalism Studies. V4.No1, 65-77.  Goodwin, H. (1987). Grouping for ethics in journalism. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.  Glynn, Kevin (2000). Tabloid culture. Durham: Duke UP, 2000.  Habermas, J. (1989). Structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge: Policy Press.  Hausman, C. (1992). Crisis of Conscience: Perspectives on Journalism Ethics. 胡幼偉(譯) (1992/1995)。良心危機─新聞理論學的多元觀點，臺北：五南圖書出版公司。  Hall, Stuart (1996). “Gramsci’s relevance for the study of race and ethnicity.” New York: Routledge.  Hong Kong Journalists Association (1999). The ground rules change, freedom of expression in Hong Kong two years after the handover to China. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Journalists Association.  Jay Rosen (2001). What Are Journalists For? Yale University Press.  Jeff Chester (2007). Digital destiny: New media and the future of democracy.The New Press.  Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. pp. 114-122 London.  Lyotard, J. (1984). The postmordern condition: A report on knowledge. Trans. by G. Bennington and B. Massumi. Minneapolis.  Leo Bogart (1991). Preserving the press: How daily newspapers mobilized to keep their readers, Columbia University Press.  Lee, A.Y.L. (1997). Legitimating media education: From social movement to the formation of a new social curriculum. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of British Columbia, Canada.  Mott, F. (1962). American journalism (3rd Ed.). Toronto: Macmillan.  Mc Combs, M.E. & Shaw, D.L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 177-187.
描述	博士國立政治大學新聞研究所 90451504 98
資料來源	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0904515041
資料類型	thesis

dc.contributor.advisor	王石番	zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors)	楊秀娟	zh_TW
dc.creator (作者)	楊秀娟	zh_TW
dc.date (日期)	2009	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	8-Dec-2010 01:51:29 (UTC+8)	-
dc.date.available	8-Dec-2010 01:51:29 (UTC+8)	-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間)	8-Dec-2010 01:51:29 (UTC+8)	-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers)	G0904515041	en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI)	http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/48840	-
dc.description (描述)	博士	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	國立政治大學	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	新聞研究所	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	90451504	zh_TW
dc.description (描述)	98	zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)	面臨嚴峻的商業競爭，報業老闆對新聞事業的想像或認知，關乎競爭策略的擬定，競爭策略是否能獲得新聞記者的認同，是報業組織溝通的重要課題，它不但牽涉到報紙生產商品、新聞的內涵，也影響組織整體戰力或競爭力的發揮。本論文以2008年易主後的《中國時報》為個案研究，探討報紙的組織溝通與其競爭力間的關連。雖說是關連性的分析，但本文未採量化分析，而是著重如何「理解」組織上下層溝通與其競爭力之間的關係。本文採用拉克勞（Laclau & Mouffe）的論述理論（Discourse Theory）架構來觀察組織上下層的溝通行為。溝通是一種語言符號的串連與建構，新聞事業具雙重特質，每日生產的新聞不但與文化、政治領域息息相關，同時也是典型的消費商品。作為一個商業組織，報紙每日面對生存競爭論述，新經營者亟思競爭優勢之建立，另一方面記者這一行也有其歷史形構的新聞專業論述，當這些論述與新的領導者蔡衍明先生相遇，會產生何種溝通樣貌？研究發現蔡衍明先生因米果事業在中國發跡致富，報紙對他而言是個全新的事業體。他對新聞的認知或想像，與上述的新聞專業論述有不小差距，這些差距在組織溝通上產生不少衝撞，致使組織的穩定度不佳，競爭力發揮有限。如果說組織是一個語言符號的結構體，那麼新中國時報的組織體仍處於一種不完整的、有缺口的半結構狀態，從論述理論的架構而言，就是上下層的組織溝通過程中，始終未產生一強而有力的主導論述，以縫合這缺口。本研究之結論顯示當組織內的論述仍處於衝撞不穩定狀態時，其產出之商品難以建立差異化特色，競爭優勢亦難以建立。	zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)	This thesis presents a theoretical model to address the communication behavior and competitive strategy issues in the newspaper industry, where technological changes have greatly increased the scope of competition. Newspaper companies are being confronted with market changes that are destablising successful mature markets, undermining long-term relationships with readers and advertisers, and threatening the sustainability of their business models. The pace of these changes is extraordinary, forcing managers, shareholders, and employees to scramble to comprehend the changes, to develop strategic responses, and to reorganize their activities. The thesis starts with the case of China Times Daily, which used to be one of the biggest newspapers in Taiwan but sold, in the end of 2008, to a successful businessman of rice cracker, Tsai Eng-Meng. Tsai Eng-Meng, now 53, runs the biggest snack empire in China. Want Want China is now unrivaled in the country’s rice cracker market. It’s not unusual for powerful businesspeople looking to ensure a public outlet for their views to invest in the media. The question is how Tsai Eng-Meng, as the latest entrant into the media market, can manage the newspaper as successful as his cracker business. In divided Taiwan, where pro-China and anti-China groups can’t agree on much, Tsai’s purchase of the China Times sparked worries about free speech in the society and inside China Times as well. Tsai Eng-Meng does not have an experience or knowledge base of how to operate the press. The employees he needs to communicate with or he needs to “understand” mostly are the reporters with expertise in news industry. They highly praise the values of free speech and impartial reports. These values can be regarded as the most important discourse evolving from the press history. With the analytical framework of Laclau and Mouffe’s Discourse Theory, the communication between Tsai Eng-Meng and the reporters is not smooth. Some events occurring in the first year of Tsai’s management reveals that the confrontation between Tsai and the news department is so harsh that even diminishes competitive advantages of the company. Since the communication behavior in China Times remains unstable, there is not possible to bring a dominant discourse in the organization, which will lead to a bad performance in ways of public opinion and the circulation.	en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents	第一章緒論………………………………………………………………1 第一節研究動機…………………………………………………………1 第二節研究背景與起源：《中國時報》易主……………………….….2 第三節研究目的…………………………………………………………6 第二章文獻探討…………………………………………………………12 第一節產業分析…………………………………………………………12 第二節組織理論…………………………………………………………18 第三節組織溝通與傳播理論……………………………………………21 第四節組織溝通與傳播研究的新方向：論述理論……………………26 第五節權力、領導與組織………………………………………………30 第六節媒介組織內的兩項主要論述……………………………………34 第七節研究問題…………………………………………………………51 第三章研究方法…………………………………………………………52 第一節個案研究…………………………………………………………52 第二節個案研究之資料收集……………………………………………54 第三節深度訪談法………………………………………………………57 第四節內容分析法………………………………………………………59 第五節研究設計…………………………………………………………62 第四章資料分析……………………………………….…………………68 第一節《中國時報》生存競爭論述分析 ……………………………….70 第二節《中國時報》新聞專業論述溝通 ……………………………… 86 第三節報紙商品內容之改變……………………………….……………97 第四節差異化策略之比較………………………………….…………...102 第五章結論……………………………………………………….…….. 109 第一節研究發現………………………………………………….…….. 109 第二節研究意涵與限制…………………………………….………….. 119 參考文獻…………………………………………….…………………… 122 附錄………………………………………………………………………..132	zh_TW
dc.language.iso	en_US	-
dc.source.uri (資料來源)	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0904515041	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	組織溝通	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	競爭力	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	中國時報	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	論述理論	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	拉克勞	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	報業組織	zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	organizational behavior	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	competitive advantage	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	China Times	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	Discourse theory	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	Laclau	en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞)	The press	en_US
dc.title (題名)	報業組織溝通與競爭分析--以中國時報為例	zh_TW
dc.title (題名)	The organizational behavior and competitive analysis:case study of China Times	en_US
dc.type (資料類型)	thesis	en
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	中文文獻	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 刁曼蓬、游常山（1997）。第一大報，金子打造：三大報經營爭霸戰。天下雜誌，7，60-78。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 王石番（1990）。傳播內容分析法：理論與實證。台北：幼獅。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 王洪鈞（1991）。大眾傳播與現代社會。台北：正中。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 王雲怡（2001）。狗仔隊旋風八卦狂潮，亞洲週刊，15 期，24。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 尤子彥、林瑩秋、陳鳳英（2008）。中國時報易主了。商業週刊，1094。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 司徒達賢（2005）。管理學的新世界。台北：天下遠見出版股份有限公司。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 李金銓、蘇鑰機、陳文（1999，1月4日）。九十年代傳媒可信度的變遷。明報，頁E9。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 李金銓、蘇鑰機、馮應謙（1996，2月5日）。新聞工作者如何看報紙可信度〉，明報。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 何榮幸、邱奕嵩、聞學潔、李淨瑜（2001）。狗仔惡戰，目擊者，23。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 吳燕玲（2002）。不可忽視的媒體人─黎智英，新新聞，774，19-20。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Morsy, Z. (1984). Preface. In Z. Morsy (Ed.), Media education, pp. 5-12, Paris: UNESCO.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Merrill, J. (1989). The dialect in journalism. LA: Louisiana State University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Mcmanus, J. (1994).Market-Driven Journalism. Sage Publication.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Mishler, Elliot G. Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986)	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Porter, M.E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Pippert, W. (1988). An ethics of news. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Picard, R.G. (1996). “The rise and fall of communication empires,” The Journal of Media Economics, 9(4), 23-40.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Picard, R.G. & Rimmer, T. (1999). “Weathering a recession: Effects of size and diversification on newspaper companies," The Journal of Media Economics 12(1),1-18.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 李筱雯（2004）。好新聞？好生意？台灣報業生產政治的轉變。政治大學新聞學研究所碩士論文。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Picard, R. G. (2000). “Audience fragmentation and sructural limits on media innovation and diversity,” pp. 180-191 in Jan van Cuilenburg and Richard van der Wurff, eds. Media and Open Societies: Cultural, Economic and Policy Foundations for Media Openness and Diversity in East and West.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Picard, R. G. (2001). “Expansion and limits in EU television markets: Audience, advertising, and competition issues,” Discussion Papers C2/2001, Business Research and Development Centre, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Picard, R.G. (2002). The economics and financing of media Companies. New York: Fordham University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Picard, R.G. (2003). “Cash cows or entrecôte: Publishing companies and new technologies”.Trends in Communication, 11(2), 127-136.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Phillips, B.K. (2000). “Rethinking competitive strategies in the American trade-book Industry,” Competitiveness Review 10(2), 65-79.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Philip Meyer (2004).The vanishing newspaper: Saving journalism in the information age. University of Missouri Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Searl, J. R., (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. The free press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Butler, J., Laclau, E., & Zizek S. (2000). Contingence, Hegemony, Universality. Verso, London.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Schiller, H. (1989). Culture, Inc.: The corporate takeover of public expression.New York: Oxford University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Stephen D. Cooper (2006). Watching the watchdog: Bloggers as the fifth estate. Marquette Books.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 李欣（2008）。“旺旺之父”蔡衍明傳奇，2008年11月3日，取自http://hk.huaxia.com/tslj/rdrw/2008/11/1209049.html	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Scott Gant (2007).We’re All Journalists Now: The transformation of the press and reshaping of the law in the internet age, Free Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Torfing, J. (1999). New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek. Balckwell, UK.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Underwood, D. (1993). When MBAs rule the newsroom. New York: Columbia University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Vines, S. (1999). Hong Kong: China』s New Colony, London: Orion Business Books.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Wacks, R. (1992). The right to privacy in civil liberties in Hong Kong, in Wacks, R. (ed.).Civil liberties in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Wesley-Smith, P. (1993). An introduction to the Hong Kong legal system. (2nd Ed.). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Yong Liu, (2002). Essays on competitive strategies in the broadcasting television industry. University of British Columbia.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 林思平（2008）。通俗新聞：文化研究的觀點。台北：五南。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 林宜諄（2001）。下流不是他成功的唯一理由，數位時代，23 期，226-230。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 林麗雲（2002）。台灣威權政體下「侍從報業」的矛盾與轉型：1949 – 1999，台灣產業研究，3，89-148。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 林倖妃（2009）。他們怎麼賣新聞。天下雜誌，32- 40。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 施威全（2003）。誰會歡迎狗仔隊。蘋果日報，論壇版。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 韋思曼（2003）。蘋果日報能紅多久。動腦雜誌，326 。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 胡七玲（2003）。蘋果顛覆記者新聞認知。銘報即時新聞。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 翁秀琪（1992）。大眾傳播理論與實證。台北：三民。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 徐聯恩（1996）。企業變革系列研究。台北：華泰書局。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 徐毓莉（2002）。組織變革對新聞室成員態度之影響 – 中時報系個案研究，銘傳大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 梁偉賢（1996）。香港新聞道德專業化的面貌。「邁向21世紀兩岸三地傳播媒介研討會」論文。香港，頁23-24。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 張文強（1997）。新聞專業與商業邏輯的矛盾–企管與新聞訓練對報業經營認知的影響，民意研究季刊，202，87 – 112。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 張文強（1998）。報紙產業組織結構分析與再形塑–組織理論的觀點，新聞學研究，57，191 – 211。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 張錦華（2001）。傳播批判理論。台北：黎明文化。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 范碧珍（2001）。狗仔一出、誰與爭鋒？壹週刊改變台灣媒體生態？，突破，192， 80-83。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 彭明輝（2001）。中文報業王國的興起：王惕吾與聯合報系。北縣﹕稻鄉。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 黃毅峰（2001）。狗仔既出，媒體爭鋒，新經濟，10， 14-18。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 辜曉進（2004）。走進美國大報–探索媒體競爭利的第一現場報導。台北：左岸文化。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 黎晶晶、楊沛文、劉志明（2001）。網路教父收山狗仔大亨來了！，商業週刊，693，50-55。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 劉仲冬（1996）。量與質社會研究的爭議及社會研究未來的走向及出路，胡幼慧(編)，質性研究 - 理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，頁121- 139。台北：巨流。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 劉萍（2002）黎智英亂台，今週刊，329。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 郭力昕（2002）。壹週刊與台灣媒體文化的轉向，誠品好讀，18，20。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 陸燕玲（2002）。從「名門正派」到明教教徒﹖- 台灣「壹周刊」新聞工作者的調適與認同。台灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 陳雪彗（1993）。台灣報社的生產政治：一個腦力勞動控制的研究。台灣大學社會研究所碩士論文。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 陳炳宏（2001）。媒體服務本質與產權規範：從有線廣播電視法修法趨勢看傳播媒體的角色。廣播與電視，2，29-51。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 陳楚孟（2002）。從報紙煽色腥新聞內容探討報業企業社會責任之研究。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 陳延升（2003）。蘋果vs.臺灣三大報，180天攻防。數位時代，55期。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 陳順孝（2004）。善用「小報」創意、開展「大報」新局。台北：行政院新聞局。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 陳宗逸（2008）。自由打敗中時十五年復仇記。新台灣新聞週刊，640。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 陳志平（2009，2，11）。金溥聰不跟馬英九跟黎智英，不入閣、不入府、入電視台。聯合晚報。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 楊孝濚（1989）。社會及行為科學研究法。台北：東華書局。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 蔡衍明（2008）。給中時員工的一封信。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 張榮哲（1995）。〈遭逢異己：拉克勞與慕芙的霸權與社會主義戰略〉，《當代》105期書評。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 羅文輝、張黎文（1996）。臺灣新聞人員的專業倫理：1994年的調查分析。「傳播與經濟發展研討會」論文。香港，頁2-5。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 譚士屏（2001）。台灣報紙產品市場競爭行為分析：1988 - 1999。政治大學新聞學研究所碩士論文。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 嚴菲妤（2002）。黎智英將帶來「蛋塔」效應？，商業新聞，11， 22-25。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 閻紀宇 (2009，2，5)。摳成本救報業？網路收費是王道。中時電子報。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 蘇鑰機（1996）。完全市場導向新聞學：《蘋果日報》個案研究。「傳播與經濟發展研討會」論文，香港，頁2-5。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 蘇鑰機（1997）。完全市場導向新聞學：蘋果日報個案研究，陳文、朱立、潘忠黨（編），大眾傳播與市場經濟。香港：爐峰學會。15-23。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 蘇蘅（2002）。競爭時代的報紙–理論與實務。台北：時英。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Curran, James.（1985）.Power without responsibility：the press and broadcasting in Britain. London；New York：Methuen. 魏玓、劉昌德 (譯)（2001）。有權無責：英國的報紙與廣電媒體，台北：編譯館。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Giddens, Anthony. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age。趙旭東、方文（譯）（2005）。現代性與自我認同，台北：左岸文化。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Peter F. Drucker. (1995) Innovation and Entrepreneurship:Practice and Principles.蕭富峰、李田樹（譯）（1998）。創新與創業精神，台北：麥田。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Picard, Robert G（1989）. Media economics：concepts and issues. Newbury Park, Calif.：Sage, 馮建三（譯）（1994）。媒介經濟學，台北：遠流。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Robert Bobcock。張君玫（譯）（1999）。消費。台北：巨流。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Frank Webster。馮建三（譯）（1999）。資訊社會理論。台北：遠流。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 McQuail,Denis.（2000,McQuail`s mass communication theory. London； Thousand Oaks，Calif.：Sage Publications. 陳芸芸、劉慧雯（譯）（2001）。最新大眾傳播理論(上下冊)，台北：韋伯文化。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 中研院社會所（2003）。台灣社會變遷基本調查。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 維基百科（2006）。台灣報業發展與沿革，2008年9月25日，取自http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E8%87%AA%E7%94%B1%E6%99%82%E5%A0%B1&variant=zh-tw	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Philip Meyer (2007).The vanishing newspaper. 張衛平（譯）正在消失的報紙 : 如何拯救信息時代的新聞業。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究﹐台北﹕五南。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	英文文獻	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Altschull, J. (1984). Agents of power. New York: Longman.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Breed, Warran. (1955). Social control in the newsroom. Social Force, 33,323 – 325.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Baudrillard, Jean (1988). Jean baudrillard: Selected writings. Ed. Mark Poster.Stanford: Stanford UP.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Barker, L. (1990).Communication (5th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Bagdikian, B. (1992). The media monopoly (4th Ed.). Boston: Beacon Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Bagdikian, B.H. (1997). The media monopoly. 5th ed. Boston：Beacon Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Baudrillard, Jean (1993). Jean baudrillard live: Selected interviews. Ed. Mike Gane.London: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Bird, Elizabeth S. (1998). Tabloid Tales – Global Debates over Media Standards. Colin Sparks & John Tulloch (eds.), Audience Demands in a Murderous Market﹕Tabloidization in U.S. Television News (213 – 228). USA﹕Rowman&Littlefield Publishers, Inc.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Bill Kovach & Tom Rosenstiel (2001). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. Three Rivers Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Collins, J.C. (1994).Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. Harvard Business.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Cronin, M. and Mcpherson, J. (1995) Pronouncements and denunciations: An analysis of state press association ethics codes from the 1920s`, Jouranlism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 890-901.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Chung, T.Y. (1995). Surveys on media performance and freedom of speech: Summary report. Hong Kong: Social Sciences Research Center of the University of Hong Kong, Radio Television Hong Kong, and Hong Kong Journalism Association.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Clayton Christensen and Michael E. Raynor (2003). The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth, Harvard business school press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Cohen, C.J. (1999). The boundaries of blackness: AIDS and the breakdown of black politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 David Morley and Kuan-Hsin Chen. (1996). Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies .New York: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Dahlgren, P. (1991). Television and the public sphere: Citizenship, democracy and the media. London: Sage Publications.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Denton, Frank (1993).Old newspaper and new realities﹕The promise of the marketing of Journalism. USA﹕A Twentieth Century Fund, Inc.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Downie, Leonard Jr. & Kaiser，Robert G (2002).The news about the news：American journalism in peril. USA：Random House, Inc.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Engwall, Lars (1978).Newspaper as organizations. Farnborough, Hants︰Saxon House.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Engwall, Lars (1986).Newspaper adaptation to a changing social environment：A case study of organizational drift as a response to resource dependence. European Journal of Communication.Vol.1, 327-341.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Eckman, Alyssa & Lindl of Thomas (2003). Negotiating the gray lines：An ethnographic case study of organizational conflict between advertorials and news. Journalism Studies. V4.No1, 65-77.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Goodwin, H. (1987). Grouping for ethics in journalism. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Glynn, Kevin (2000). Tabloid culture. Durham: Duke UP, 2000.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Habermas, J. (1989). Structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge: Policy Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Hausman, C. (1992). Crisis of Conscience: Perspectives on Journalism Ethics. 胡幼偉(譯) (1992/1995)。良心危機─新聞理論學的多元觀點，臺北：五南圖書出版公司。	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Hall, Stuart (1996). “Gramsci’s relevance for the study of race and ethnicity.” New York: Routledge.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Hong Kong Journalists Association (1999). The ground rules change, freedom of expression in Hong Kong two years after the handover to China. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Journalists Association.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Jay Rosen (2001). What Are Journalists For? Yale University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Jeff Chester (2007). Digital destiny: New media and the future of democracy.The New Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. pp. 114-122 London.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Lyotard, J. (1984). The postmordern condition: A report on knowledge. Trans. by G. Bennington and B. Massumi. Minneapolis.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Leo Bogart (1991). Preserving the press: How daily newspapers mobilized to keep their readers, Columbia University Press.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Lee, A.Y.L. (1997). Legitimating media education: From social movement to the formation of a new social curriculum. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of British Columbia, Canada.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Mott, F. (1962). American journalism (3rd Ed.). Toronto: Macmillan.	zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)	 Mc Combs, M.E. & Shaw, D.L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 177-187.	zh_TW

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

Google Scholar^TM