Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 公司財務特性對私募折價幅度之影響
The effects of financial characteristics on price discounts in private placement
作者 藍亦敏
貢獻者 張清福
藍亦敏
關鍵詞 私募
財務特性
折價幅度
Private placement
Financial characteristics
Discounts
日期 2009
上傳時間 8-Dec-2010 01:53:08 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究以2002年至2010年4底前辦理私募增資之上市(櫃)公司為研究對象,探討公司財務特性對私募折價幅度之影響。研究結果顯示, 私募金額占公司市值比例與無形資產價值愈高,象徵公司價值的衡量愈複雜,私募應募人在衡量私募公司價值時需付出的較高成本,折價幅度將較高。再者,當私募目的指出私募公司有新的投資機會時,私募之折價幅度將較小;另外,私募公司股東權益報酬率愈高,代表私募公司利用現有資源效率較高,折價幅度愈低;而私募公司負債對股東權益比愈大,其長期償債能力較差,營運風險也會提升,所以應募人會要求較高折價幅度以補償此風險;當私募公司有發生財務危機可能時,應募人也會要求較高折價補償其所承受之風險。因此,私募折價幅度與公司資訊成本、投資機會及營運風險程度有密切關聯。
This study examines the effects of financial characteristics on price discounts in private placement. Based on the Market Observation Post System, the sample includes private placements of all listed and OTC firms in Taiwan during 2002 to April of 2010. The empirical evidence shows that discounts will be larger when private placement size is large relative to firm size. Intangible assets are difficult to value and therefore private placement investors will require larger discounts as compensation. If the issuer’s purposes of private placement indicate the availability of positive NPV investment opportunity to the firm then the discount will be smaller. In addition, the ROE variable has significant and negative association with discounts. This is consistent with the expectation that investors will assess the quality of the firm’s existing assets to form an opinion on risk and expected return of their private equity investment. On the other hand, high debt levels as measured by debt to equity result in higher discounts. Moreover, the existence of financial crisis is positively associated with discounts. In a word, the size of the discount to current market price is strongly related to proxies for the quality of the firm’s financial characteristics, future prospects and risk.
參考文獻 台灣工銀證券投顧,2005,私募有價證券之相關規定及市場現況分析,台灣工銀證券投顧研究報告。
呂季蓉,2005,台灣上市上櫃公司私募之研究—論私募對象之影響,國立中山大學財務管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
林嘉慧,2007,台灣上市公司私募股權現況與績效之探討,東吳大學商學院企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
徐筱玲,2008,社會資本、公司治理與私募折價幅度關聯性研究,國立中正大學會計與資訊科技研究所碩士論文。
袁國傑,2009,私募對企業績效與異常報酬之影響-家族企業與非家族企業,國立成功大學會計學系碩士論文。
張荷君,2009,私募應募人種類與經營績效之探討,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
張儒欣,2006,私募股權之折價發行-公司治理機制、盈餘管理行為與無形資產之影響,國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
梁晏慈,2007,論私募公司之折價發行、宣告效果及長期績效表現,淡江大學財務金融學系碩士班。
許雪芳,2003,上市上櫃公司私募之研究,國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
郭嘉哲,2008,會計性資訊不對稱、智慧資本與私募折價幅度之關聯性,國立中正大學會計與資訊科技研究所碩士論文。
陳以姍,2010,私募定價與公司價值之探討:以台灣上市上櫃公司為例,國立政治大學金融研究所碩士論文。
陳永吉,2010,上市櫃私募年?180家小股東誰憐,自由時報電子報。網址:http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/may/21/today-e2.htm。
陳俊合、羅國華與王馨晨,2009,內部人認購、公司治理結構與私募股權折價,證券市場發展季刊,第82期(7月):119-150。
陸瀛謙,2008,私募折價幅度及私募前後異常報酬,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
曾國仁,2009,台積電私募入股茂迪20%,聯手進軍發展綠能產業,財金文化。網址:http://www.invest.com.tw/news.asp?articleNo=1369。
黃超邦,2008,從實證觀點檢討我國證券私募法制,證交資料,第551期:29-48。
黃德芬與盧素蓮,2003,企業籌資新里程碑-私募有價證券之法令與實務探討,會計研究月刊,第211期(6月):94-95。
劉家琳,2009,私募普通股之折價幅度與私募時效性、自我利益及公司治理之關聯,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
蔡蓓華,2009,私募長短期績效探討,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
蘇瓜藤、李志宏、李怡宗與王儷玲,2005,個別無形資產評價之理論分析與可行性探討-以品牌為例,經濟部技術處研究報告。
Anderson, H. D. 2006. Discounted private placements in New Zealand: Exploitation or Fair Compensation? Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies 9 (4): 533-548.
Anderson, H. D. and L. C. Rose. 2007. Firm quality and the placement price of private equity. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=968249.
Barclay, M. J., C. G. Holderness, and D. P. Sheehan. 2007. Private placements and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Corporate Finance 13 (September): 461-484.
Chemmanur, T. and P. Fulghieri. 1999. A theory of going-public decision. The Review of Financial Studies 12 (2): 249-279.
Chu, S. M., G. H. Lentz, and E. Robak. 2005. Comparing the characteristics and performance of private equity offering firms with seasoned equity offering firms. Journal of Economics and Management 1 (January): 57-83.
Chung, K. H. and S. W. Pruitt.1994. A simple approximation of tobin`s q. Financial Management 23 (Autumn): 70-74.
Demsetz, H. and K. Lehn. 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93 (December): 1155-1177.
Heinkel, R. and E. S. Schwartz. 1986. Rights versus underwritten offerings: An asymmetric information approach. Journal of Finance 41: 1-18.
Hertzel, M. G. and R. L. Smith. 1993. Market discounts and shareholder gains for placing equity privately. Journal of Finance 48 (June): 459-485.
Hertzel, M. G., M. Lemmon, J. Linck, and L. Rees. 2002. Long-run performance following private placements of equity. Journal of Finance 57 (December): 2595-2617.
Krishnamurthy, S., P. Spindt, V. Subramaniam, and T. Woidtke. 2005. Does investor identity matter in equity issues? Evidence from private placements. Journal of Financial Intermediation 14 (April): 210-238.
Lindenberg, E. and S. Ross. 1981. Tobin’s q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business 54 (January): 1-32.
Myers, S. C. and N. S. Majluf. 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when the firm has information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13 (July): 187-221.
Sheehan, D. P. and J. Swisher. 1998. How sophisticated are “Sophisticated Investor”? Working paper, Penn State University.
Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. The Journal of Political Economy 94 (June): 461-488.
Silber, W. L. 1991. Discounts on restricted stock: the impact of illiquidity on   stock prices. Financial Analysts Journal 47 (January): 60-64.
Tan, R. S. K., P. L. Chng, and Y. H. Tong. 2002. Private placements and rights issues in Singapore. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 10 (1): 29-54.
Tobin, J. and W. C. Brainard. 1977. Asset markets and the cost of capital. Economic progress: Private values and public policy: 235-262.
Wruck, K. H. 1989. Equity ownership concentration and firm value: Evidence from private equity financings. Journal of Financial Economics 23 (June): 3-28.
Wruck, K. H. and Y. Wu. 2009. Relationships, corporate governance, and performance: Evidence from private placements of common stock. Journal of Corporate Finance 15 (February): 30-47.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
97353041
98
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097353041
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 張清福zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 藍亦敏zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 藍亦敏zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 8-Dec-2010 01:53:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 8-Dec-2010 01:53:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 8-Dec-2010 01:53:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0097353041en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/48917-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97353041zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究以2002年至2010年4底前辦理私募增資之上市(櫃)公司為研究對象,探討公司財務特性對私募折價幅度之影響。研究結果顯示, 私募金額占公司市值比例與無形資產價值愈高,象徵公司價值的衡量愈複雜,私募應募人在衡量私募公司價值時需付出的較高成本,折價幅度將較高。再者,當私募目的指出私募公司有新的投資機會時,私募之折價幅度將較小;另外,私募公司股東權益報酬率愈高,代表私募公司利用現有資源效率較高,折價幅度愈低;而私募公司負債對股東權益比愈大,其長期償債能力較差,營運風險也會提升,所以應募人會要求較高折價幅度以補償此風險;當私募公司有發生財務危機可能時,應募人也會要求較高折價補償其所承受之風險。因此,私募折價幅度與公司資訊成本、投資機會及營運風險程度有密切關聯。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study examines the effects of financial characteristics on price discounts in private placement. Based on the Market Observation Post System, the sample includes private placements of all listed and OTC firms in Taiwan during 2002 to April of 2010. The empirical evidence shows that discounts will be larger when private placement size is large relative to firm size. Intangible assets are difficult to value and therefore private placement investors will require larger discounts as compensation. If the issuer’s purposes of private placement indicate the availability of positive NPV investment opportunity to the firm then the discount will be smaller. In addition, the ROE variable has significant and negative association with discounts. This is consistent with the expectation that investors will assess the quality of the firm’s existing assets to form an opinion on risk and expected return of their private equity investment. On the other hand, high debt levels as measured by debt to equity result in higher discounts. Moreover, the existence of financial crisis is positively associated with discounts. In a word, the size of the discount to current market price is strongly related to proxies for the quality of the firm’s financial characteristics, future prospects and risk.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究問題 6
第三節 研究流程 7
第四節 研究架構 8
第貳章 文獻探討 9
第一節 我國私募制度之相關規範 9
第二節 私募制度之優缺點 14
第三節 私募制度之運用 16
第四節 國內外私募股權之相關文獻 19
第參章 研究方法 31
第一節 研究假說 31
第二節 研究對象與期間、資料來源 34
第三節 研究變數之設計 36
第四節 研究方法與實證模型 39
第肆章 實證結果與分析 40
第一節 敘述性統計 40
第二節 相關性分析 47
第三節 迴歸分析 49
第四節 敏感性分析 55
第伍章 結論與建議 58
第一節 研究結論 58
第二節 研究限制 59
第三節 對私募制度之建議 60
第四節 後續研究建議 62
參考文獻 63
圖目錄
圖1-1 2003年至2009年上市(櫃)公司私募與現金增資趨勢比較 2
圖1-2 研究流程之說明 7
表目錄
表4-1 上市(櫃)公司私募普通股成功樣本之年度分配 40
表4-2 上市(櫃)公司私募普通股成功樣本之產業分配 41
表4-3 上市(櫃)公司各產業私募股權平均折價幅度 42
表4-4 上市(櫃)公司各年度私募股權概況 43
表4-5 樣本篩選過程 45
表4-6 樣本敘述性統計 46
表4-7 相關係數矩陣 48
表4-8 模型一迴歸結果 49
表4-9 獨立樣本T檢定 52
表4-10 模型二迴歸結果 53
表4-11 電子業與傳統產業回歸結果 54
表4-12 全部樣本迴歸結果 55
表4-13 以定價日前五日股價為折價幅度計算之迴歸結果 56
表4-14 研究結果彙整 57
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097353041en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 私募zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 財務特性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 折價幅度zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Private placementen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Financial characteristicsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Discountsen_US
dc.title (題名) 公司財務特性對私募折價幅度之影響zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The effects of financial characteristics on price discounts in private placementen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台灣工銀證券投顧,2005,私募有價證券之相關規定及市場現況分析,台灣工銀證券投顧研究報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 呂季蓉,2005,台灣上市上櫃公司私募之研究—論私募對象之影響,國立中山大學財務管理學系碩士班碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林嘉慧,2007,台灣上市公司私募股權現況與績效之探討,東吳大學商學院企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐筱玲,2008,社會資本、公司治理與私募折價幅度關聯性研究,國立中正大學會計與資訊科技研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 袁國傑,2009,私募對企業績效與異常報酬之影響-家族企業與非家族企業,國立成功大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張荷君,2009,私募應募人種類與經營績效之探討,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張儒欣,2006,私募股權之折價發行-公司治理機制、盈餘管理行為與無形資產之影響,國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梁晏慈,2007,論私募公司之折價發行、宣告效果及長期績效表現,淡江大學財務金融學系碩士班。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許雪芳,2003,上市上櫃公司私募之研究,國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭嘉哲,2008,會計性資訊不對稱、智慧資本與私募折價幅度之關聯性,國立中正大學會計與資訊科技研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳以姍,2010,私募定價與公司價值之探討:以台灣上市上櫃公司為例,國立政治大學金融研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳永吉,2010,上市櫃私募年?180家小股東誰憐,自由時報電子報。網址:http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2010/new/may/21/today-e2.htm。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳俊合、羅國華與王馨晨,2009,內部人認購、公司治理結構與私募股權折價,證券市場發展季刊,第82期(7月):119-150。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陸瀛謙,2008,私募折價幅度及私募前後異常報酬,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 曾國仁,2009,台積電私募入股茂迪20%,聯手進軍發展綠能產業,財金文化。網址:http://www.invest.com.tw/news.asp?articleNo=1369。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃超邦,2008,從實證觀點檢討我國證券私募法制,證交資料,第551期:29-48。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃德芬與盧素蓮,2003,企業籌資新里程碑-私募有價證券之法令與實務探討,會計研究月刊,第211期(6月):94-95。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉家琳,2009,私募普通股之折價幅度與私募時效性、自我利益及公司治理之關聯,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡蓓華,2009,私募長短期績效探討,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇瓜藤、李志宏、李怡宗與王儷玲,2005,個別無形資產評價之理論分析與可行性探討-以品牌為例,經濟部技術處研究報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anderson, H. D. 2006. Discounted private placements in New Zealand: Exploitation or Fair Compensation? Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies 9 (4): 533-548.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anderson, H. D. and L. C. Rose. 2007. Firm quality and the placement price of private equity. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=968249.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barclay, M. J., C. G. Holderness, and D. P. Sheehan. 2007. Private placements and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Corporate Finance 13 (September): 461-484.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chemmanur, T. and P. Fulghieri. 1999. A theory of going-public decision. The Review of Financial Studies 12 (2): 249-279.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chu, S. M., G. H. Lentz, and E. Robak. 2005. Comparing the characteristics and performance of private equity offering firms with seasoned equity offering firms. Journal of Economics and Management 1 (January): 57-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chung, K. H. and S. W. Pruitt.1994. A simple approximation of tobin`s q. Financial Management 23 (Autumn): 70-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Demsetz, H. and K. Lehn. 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93 (December): 1155-1177.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Heinkel, R. and E. S. Schwartz. 1986. Rights versus underwritten offerings: An asymmetric information approach. Journal of Finance 41: 1-18.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hertzel, M. G. and R. L. Smith. 1993. Market discounts and shareholder gains for placing equity privately. Journal of Finance 48 (June): 459-485.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hertzel, M. G., M. Lemmon, J. Linck, and L. Rees. 2002. Long-run performance following private placements of equity. Journal of Finance 57 (December): 2595-2617.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krishnamurthy, S., P. Spindt, V. Subramaniam, and T. Woidtke. 2005. Does investor identity matter in equity issues? Evidence from private placements. Journal of Financial Intermediation 14 (April): 210-238.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lindenberg, E. and S. Ross. 1981. Tobin’s q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business 54 (January): 1-32.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Myers, S. C. and N. S. Majluf. 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when the firm has information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13 (July): 187-221.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sheehan, D. P. and J. Swisher. 1998. How sophisticated are “Sophisticated Investor”? Working paper, Penn State University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. The Journal of Political Economy 94 (June): 461-488.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Silber, W. L. 1991. Discounts on restricted stock: the impact of illiquidity on   stock prices. Financial Analysts Journal 47 (January): 60-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tan, R. S. K., P. L. Chng, and Y. H. Tong. 2002. Private placements and rights issues in Singapore. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 10 (1): 29-54.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tobin, J. and W. C. Brainard. 1977. Asset markets and the cost of capital. Economic progress: Private values and public policy: 235-262.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wruck, K. H. 1989. Equity ownership concentration and firm value: Evidence from private equity financings. Journal of Financial Economics 23 (June): 3-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wruck, K. H. and Y. Wu. 2009. Relationships, corporate governance, and performance: Evidence from private placements of common stock. Journal of Corporate Finance 15 (February): 30-47.zh_TW