| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳錦烽 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 莊明軒 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 莊明軒 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2009 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 8-Dec-2010 01:53:12 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 8-Dec-2010 01:53:12 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 8-Dec-2010 01:53:12 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0097353048 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/48922 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 會計研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 97353048 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 98 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本研究之目的在於瞭解適任的內部稽核人員應具備之人格特質與技能，並探討這些人格特質與技能是否受到產業別或機構特性之影響。本研究以參加中華民國內部稽核協會例會活動之內部稽核人員為對象，於活動現場發放並回收研究問卷，以獲得相關的實證資料。 根據實證結果，本研究的主要發現與結論如下：1.適任的內部稽核人員應具備「勤勉審慎性」之人格特質，以及「分析性技 能」與「判斷性技能」。2.電子業內部稽核人員重視「外向性」之人格特質的程度高於金融業內部稽核人員，且較其它產業更為重視「自我調適與人際溝通技能」。3.稽核主管重視「和善性」及「經驗開放性」兩大人格特質及「分析性技能」的程度高於非稽核主管。4.公司營收在40億元以上之稽核主管，對其實際具備相關技能之程度最有自信。5.稽核單位整體具備的技能低於稽核人員實際具備之技能，反映填答者對本身實際具備之技能較有信心，而對稽核單位整體具備之技能的看法則較為保守。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The purpose of this study is to understand the personality traits and skills that a competent internal auditor should possess and to examine the industry and firm effects on these traits and skills. By means of distributing the research questionnaire to the internal auditors attending the IIA-Taiwan monthly meetings, this study gathers related data and perform various analyses. Our empirical results show that:1. A competent internal auditor should possess the traits of conscientiousness, and the analytic and appreciative skills.2. Internal auditors of the electronics industry attach more importance to the extraversion traits than those from the financial industry, and value the personal and interpersonal skills more than those auditors from other industries.3. Chief audit executives (CAEs) value the agreeableness and openness to experience traits, and the analytic skills more than non-CAEs.4. CAEs from the companies with operating revenue over forty billions NT dollars are most confident with the skills that they possess.5. Most respondents believe that his/her internal audit department’s level of skills is less sufficient than that of individual auditors. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 圖目錄 ..................................... II表目錄 ..................................... II第壹章 緒論 ................................. 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 ...................... 1 第二節 研究問題 ........................... 5 第三節 論文架構 ........................... 5第貳章 文獻探討 ............................. 7 第一節 內部稽核概念 ........................ 7 第二節 人格特質與技能 ..................... 9 第三節 內部稽核人員應具備之人格特質與技能 ... 17第參章 研究方法 ............................ 21 第一節 觀念性架構.......................... 21 第二節 研究假說 .......................... 22 第三節 研究對象及資料蒐集 ................. 24 第四節 問卷設計 .......................... 25 第五節 資料分析方法 ...................... 29第肆章 實證研究分析 ........................ 30 第一節 問卷發放與回收情形 ................. 30 第二節 研究問卷信度與效度分析 ............. 31 第三節 問卷資料分析 ...................... 33 第四節 因素分析 .......................... 42 第五節 雙因子、單因子變異數分析與獨立樣本T檢定 49 第六節 研究假設實證檢定之結果 ............. 58第伍章 結論與建議 ......................... 60 第一節 研究結論 ......................... 60 第二節 研究限制與建議 .................... 63參考文獻 .................................. 65附錄 研究問卷 .............................. 71 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097353048 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 內部稽核人員 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 人格特質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 技能 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | internal auditor | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | personality traits | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | skills | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 內部稽核人員人格特質及技能之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Internal auditors’ personal traits and skills: an empirical study of Taiwan internal audit practitioners | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、 中文部份 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王梅玲，2000，廿一世紀圖書館與資訊服務新角色以及專業人員能力初探，玄奘學報，第2期：193-230。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 白淑禎，2005，內部稽核人員之人格特質與工作績效關係之研究，中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳秉恩，1990，組織行為學，台北：華泰書局。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳芝儀，2000，生涯探索與規劃，嘉義：濤石文化。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林柄滄 陳錦烽譯，2009，國際專業實務架構，中華民國內部稽核協會。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林柄滄，2003a，內部稽核理論與實務（第五版），台北：翰中有限公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林柄滄，2003b，新經濟時代的內部稽核，台北：致琦企業有限公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林盈伶，2005，人格特質、學習型態對學習成效的影響，私立朝陽科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林錦豐，2003，內部稽核人員專業能力內涵之研究，靜宜大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林能白、邱宏昌，1999，服務品質之研究— 服務人員人格特質之影響分析與應用，管理學報，第2卷，第16期：175-200。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林慧芝，2005，激勵制度對留任意願影響之探討－以內部稽核人員為例，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 邱麗家，2006，內部稽核人員人格特質、工作特性與工作滿意度關係之研究－以成就動機為中介變項，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 洪裕琨，2004，企業內部稽核人員離職傾向之研究，國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 馬秀如等譯，2005，企業風險管理－整合架構，會計研究發展基金會。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張火燦，1998，策略性人力資源管理，台北：揚智。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張惠媚，2002，醫學圖書館員專業能力需求評估之研究，私立淡江大學教育科技學系研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 莊耀嘉、李雯娣，2001，兒童性格結構：五大模型的本土化檢驗，中華心理學刊，第43期：65-82。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳建陽，2003，人格特質、知識管理認知、專業能力對工作績效影響之研 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 究－以警察機關交通事故處理為例，私立南華大學管理科學研究所碩 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 士論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳順宇，2005，多變量分析，台北：華泰文化。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃政傑，1994，課程設計，台北：東華書局。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃堅厚，1999，人格心理學，台北：心理。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 經濟部中小企業處，2003，建立品質管理內部稽核標準－餐飲業，九十二年度中小企業品質管理提升計畫執行成果報告。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 廖玲珠，2004，內部稽核人員角色壓力及工作滿足與內部稽核工作品質關係之研究，當代會計，第5卷，第2期：235-270。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 潘文章，1990，行為管理：觀念、行為、績效，台北：三民書局。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡承志譯，1986，組織行為，台北：桂冠圖書公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡欣嵐，2001，工作特性、人格特質與工作滿意度之關係--以半導體業為例，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡維奇，2000，人力資源管理的十二堂課，台北：文化書局。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 賴姿伶、余民寧、徐崇文，2009，員工甄選人格量表的編製及其信效度考驗之初步報告，教育研究與發展期刊，第5卷，第4期：269-304。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 戴維舵，1999，"Big Five"五大人格特質在人力甄選上的應用探討，致理學報，第12期：89-114。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鍾紹熙、黃博信、陳宜檉，2001，內部稽核人員專業管理能力發展之實證研究，2001年科技與管理學術研討會論文集，台北科技大學。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、 英文部份 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Allport, G. W., and H. S. Odbert. 1936. Trait names: a psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs 47(1): 112-136. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Allport, G. W. 1937. Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Allport, G. W. 1961. Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bandura, A. 1977. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Barrick, M. R., and M. K. Mount. 1991. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 44: 1-26. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Behling, O. 1998. Employee selection: Will intelligence and conscientiousness do the job? Academy of Management Executive 12: 77-86. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Birkett, W. P., M. R. Barbera, B. S. Leithhead, M. Lower, and P. J. Roebuck. 1999. Competency: Best practices and competent practitioners. Altamonte Springs, FL: The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Block, J. 1995. A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin 117: 187-215. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Catell, R. B. 1957. Personality and motivation structure and measurement. Yonkerson-Hudson, NY: World. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cheung, F. M., K. Leung, J. X. Zhang, H. F. Sun, Y. G. Gan, W. Z. Song, and D. Xie. 2001. Indigenous Chinese personality constructs: Is the five-factor model complete? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32: 407-433. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chisholm, M. E., and D. P. Ely. 1976. Media personnel in education: A competency approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Church, A. T., and W. J. Lonner. 1998. The cross-culture perspective in the study of personality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 29: 32-62. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Costa, P. T., and R. R. McCrae. 1992. Revised NEO Personality Inventory and New Five-Factor Inventory: Professional Manual. Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Conte, J., and J. Gintoff. 2005. Polychronicity, Big Five personality dimensions and sales performance. Human Performance 18: 427-440. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Davies, I. K. 1981. Competency-based learning: technology, management and design. New York: Marcel Dekker. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Day, D. V., and S. B. Silverman. 1989. Personality and Job Performance: Evidence of Incremental Validity. Personnel Psychology 42: 25-36. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Prawitt, D. F. 2008. Research Opportunities in Internal Auditing, Chapter 6. Institute of Internal Auditors. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Eysenck, H. J. 1992. Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences 13: 667-673. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Furnham, A., and C. Fudge. 2008. The five factor model of personality and sales performance. Journal of Individual Differences 29(1): 11-16. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gatewood, R. D., and H. S. Field. 1998. Human Resource Selection. 4th ed. Forth Worth, TX: The Dryden Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goldberg, L. R. 1981. Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In Review of Personality and Social Psychology, edited by L. Wheeler. CA: Beverly Hill: 141-165. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goldberg, L. R. 1982. From Ace to Zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In Advance in Personality Assessment 1, edited by C. D. Spielberger. and J. N. Butcher. NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates: 202-234. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goldberg, L. R. 1990. An Alternative Description of Personality: The Big Five Factor Structure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59:1216-1229. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Griffiths, J. M., and D. King. 1985. New directions in library and information science. In Bowker Annual of Library and Book Trade Information. 30th ed., edited by J. Moore, New York, NY: R. R. Bowker Company. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Guilford, J. P. 1959. Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hogan, R. T., and J. Hogan, and B. W. Roberts. 1996. Personality measurement and employment decisions: Questions and answers. American Psychological Association 51(5): 469-477. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hogan, J., and B. Holland. 2003. Using theory to evaluate personality and job performance relations: A social analytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 100-112. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Holland, J. L. 1985. Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hough, L. M. 1992. The "Big Five" personality variables-construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance 5(1/2): 139-155. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hough, L. M., and F. L. Oswald. 2000. Personnel Selection: Looking Toward the Future –Remembering the Past. Annual Review of Psychology 51: 631-664. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hurtz, G. M., and J. J. Donovan. 2000. Personality and job performance: The big five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology 85(6): 869-879. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | John, O. P., and S. Srivastava. 1990. The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, edited by L. A. Pervin and O. P. John. NY: Guilford Press: 102-138. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Johnson, C. E. 1977. A comparative analysis of three basic designs the competency validation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Georgia Educational Research Association. Atlanta, Georgia. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Judge, T. A., and R. Ilies. 2002. Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(4) : 797-807. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McCrae, R. R. and O. P. John. 1992. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications, Journal of Personality 60: 175-215. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McCrae, R. R., and P. Y. Costa. Jr. 1997. Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist 52: 509-516. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDaniel, M. A., and R. L. Frei. 1994. Validity of customer service measures in personnel selection: A review of criterion and construct evidence. Unpublished manuscript, University of Akron. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mount, M. K., and M. R. Barrick. 1995. The Big Five Personality Dimensions: Implications for Research and Practice in Human Resources Management. In Personnel and Human Resources Management 13, edited by G.R. Ferris, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press:153-200. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mount, M. K., M. R. Barrick, and G. L. Stewart. 1998. Five-Factor model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human Performance 11(2/3): 145-165. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Norman, W. T. 1963. Toward and adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66: 574-583. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Oxner, T. H., and J. Kusel. 2002. Job Market Outlook. Internal Auditor 59 (3): 28-35. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Peabody, D. 1987. Selecting representative trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 59-77. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rynes, S. L., M. O. Orlitzky, and R. D. Bretz. Jr. 1997. Experienced Hiring Versus College Recruiting: Practices and Emerging Trends. Personnel Psychology 50 (2): 309-339. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Salgado, J. F. 1997. The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology 82(1): 30-43. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Scott, W. G., and T. R. Mitchell. 1972. Organization Theory : A Structural and Behavioral Analysis, Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Short, E. J., and E. B. Ryan. 1984. Metacognitive difference between skilled and less skilled readers: Remediating deficits through story grammar and attribution training. Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 225-235. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Spencer Jr., and S. Spencer. 1993. Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tellegen, A. and N. Waller. 1987. Reexaming Basic Dimensions of Natural Language Trait Descriptors. Poster presented at the 95th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tupes, E. C. and R. E. Christal. 1961. Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality 60: 225-251. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Waddington, P. A. J. 1985. Development of professional competence: the case for an “educational” approach to vocational courses for the police. Police Journal 58(1): 5-16. | zh_TW |
