Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 以高頻率日內資料驗證報酬率與波動度之因果關係-以台灣期貨市場為證
Use high-frequency data measuring the relationship between returns and volatility with Taiwan futures market data
作者 趙明威
貢獻者 廖四郎
趙明威
關鍵詞 高頻率日內資料
槓桿效果
波動度預測模型
GJR-GARCH模型
日期 2009
上傳時間 8-Dec-2010 01:56:53 (UTC+8)
摘要 本篇論文的目的在驗證台股期貨報酬率與其波動度之間的相對應關係是由槓桿效果或是波動度回饋效果之因果關係所驅動,並且分別以日資料以及高頻率日內資料進行實證。實證結果發現在高頻率日內資料的應用下,能夠比日資料揭露出更詳細的波動度資訊,將報酬率與波動度間的對應關係描繪得更加明瞭。且在大多數資料期間內,同期下,台股期貨報酬率與其波動度之間會呈現負相關性,而負相關的程度會隨著報酬率遞延期數越長而逐漸遞減,因此可以發現報酬率與其波動度間呈現一個經由報酬率進而影響波動度的對應關係,與槓桿效果的因果關係雷同。最後,本文亦採用了常見的波動度預測模型,歷史模擬法、GARCH(1,1)模型、EGARCH(1,1)模型以及GJR-GARCH(1,1)模型,觀察這些波動度模型所預測出之波動度是否含有上述驗證的資訊意涵,並比較各波動度模型的預測能力,結果發現GJR-GARCH模型於樣本外期間所預測之波動度,其與報酬率之間不但具有槓桿效果的因果關係,且預測能力亦於四個波動度模型中表現最佳。
參考文獻 時間序列分析 總體經濟與財務金融之應用,陳旭昇著
Anderson, T.G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F.X. and Ebens, H.(2001).”The Distribution of Stock Return Volatility.” , Journal of Financial Economics 61(1), 43-76
Anderson, T.G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F.X. and Labys, P.(2003)”Modeling and Forecasting Realized Volatility.”, Econometrica 71, 579-625.
Awartani, B.M.A.,and Corradi, V.(2005).” Predicting the Volatility of the S&P-500 Ttock Index via GARCH Models: The Role of Asymmetries.”, International Journal of Forecasting 21 , 167-183.
Bekaert, G., and G. Wu.(2000).”Asymmetric Volatility and Risk in Equity Markets.”, The Review of Financial Studies 13, 1-42.
Black, F.(1976).”Studies of Stock Price Volatility Changes.”, Proceeding of the 1976 Meetings of the American Statisrical Association, Business and Economic Statistics PP. 177-181.
Bollerslev, T.,(1986). ”Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskeasticity”, Journal of Econometrics 31, 307-327
Bollerslev, T., Litvinova, J., and Tauchen, G.(2006).”Leverage and Volatility Feedback Effects in High-Frequency Data.”, Journal of Financial Econometrics 4, 353-384.
Campbell, J.Y., and L. Hentscel.(1992).”No News is Good News: An Asymmetric Model of Changing Volatility in Stock Returns.” , Journal of Financial Economics 31, 281-331.
Christie, A.C.(1982).”The Stochastic Behavior of Common Stock Variances – Value, Leverage and Interest Rate Effects.” , Journal of Financial Economics 3, 145-166.
Duffee, G.R.(1995).”Stock Returns and Volatility , A Firm–level analysis.”, Journal of Financial Economics 37, 399-420.
Dufour, J.M., Garcia, R., and Taamouti, A.(2008)”Measuring Causality Between Volatility and Returns with High-Frequency Data.”, Working Paper, Department of Econometircs, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.
Figlewski, S., and X. Wang.(2001).”Is the ‘Leverage Effect’ a Leverage Effect?”, Working paper, Department of Finance, New York University.
French, K.R., Schwert, G.W. and Stambaugh, R.F.(1987).”Expected Stock Returns and Volatility.” , Journal of Financial Economics 19, 3-30.
Ghysels, E., Santa-Clara, P. and Valkanov, R.(2005).”There is a Risk-Return Tradeoff After All.” , Journal of Financial Economics 76, 509-548.
Glosten, L.R., R. Jagannathan, and D.E. Runkle(1993).”On the Relation Between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks.”, Journal of Finance 48, 1779-1801.
Guan, W.(2004).” Forecasting Volatility.”, Journal of Futures Markets 25, 465-490.
Kisinbay, T.(2003).” Predictive Ability of Asymmetric Volatility Models at Medium-Term Horizons.”, IMF Working Paper, 03/131.
Poon, S.H., and Granger, C.W.J.(2003).”Forecasting Volatility in Financial Markets: A Review.”, Journal of Economic Literature 41, 478-539.
Masset, P.(2008)”Properties of High Frequency DAX Returns: Intraday patterns, Jumps and their Impact on Subsequent Volatility.”, Working Paper, Department of Finance and Accounting, University of Fribourg.
Mcmillan, D.G., and Speight, A.E.H.(2003).” Asymmetric Volatility Dynamics in High Frequency FTSE-100 Stock Index Futures.”, Applied Financial Economics 13, 599-607
Nelson, Daniel B.(1991).”Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach.”, Econometrica 59, 347-370.
Wu, G.(2001).”The Determinants of Asymmetric Volatility.”, Review of Financial Studies 14,837-859.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
金融研究所
97352011
98
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097352011
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 廖四郎zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 趙明威zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 趙明威zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 8-Dec-2010 01:56:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 8-Dec-2010 01:56:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 8-Dec-2010 01:56:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0097352011en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49008-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 金融研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97352011zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本篇論文的目的在驗證台股期貨報酬率與其波動度之間的相對應關係是由槓桿效果或是波動度回饋效果之因果關係所驅動,並且分別以日資料以及高頻率日內資料進行實證。實證結果發現在高頻率日內資料的應用下,能夠比日資料揭露出更詳細的波動度資訊,將報酬率與波動度間的對應關係描繪得更加明瞭。且在大多數資料期間內,同期下,台股期貨報酬率與其波動度之間會呈現負相關性,而負相關的程度會隨著報酬率遞延期數越長而逐漸遞減,因此可以發現報酬率與其波動度間呈現一個經由報酬率進而影響波動度的對應關係,與槓桿效果的因果關係雷同。最後,本文亦採用了常見的波動度預測模型,歷史模擬法、GARCH(1,1)模型、EGARCH(1,1)模型以及GJR-GARCH(1,1)模型,觀察這些波動度模型所預測出之波動度是否含有上述驗證的資訊意涵,並比較各波動度模型的預測能力,結果發現GJR-GARCH模型於樣本外期間所預測之波動度,其與報酬率之間不但具有槓桿效果的因果關係,且預測能力亦於四個波動度模型中表現最佳。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章、 前言…………………………………………………………1
     第二章、 文獻回顧……………………………………………………3
      第一節 波動度不對稱之現象…………………………………3
      第二節 波動度之預測…………………………………………8
     第三章、 研究方法……………………………………………………10
      第一節 資料來源……………………………………………10
      第二節 結構性轉變之檢定…………………………………10
      第三節 比較日報酬率與每五分鐘報酬率…………………12
      第四節 波動度預測模型……………………………………15
      第五節 衡量波動度模型之預測能力………………………20
     第四章、 實證結果……………………………………………………21
      第一節 資料分析……………………………………………21
      第二節 比較日報酬率與每五分鐘報酬率…………………25
      第三節 各波動度預測模型之比較…………………………31
     第五章、 結論…………………………………………………………49
     參考文獻………………………………………………………………51
     附錄A、各波動度模型於日波動度預測之時間序列圖形…………53
     附錄B、各波動度模型於每五分鐘波動度預測之時間序列圖形…55
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097352011en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 高頻率日內資料zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 槓桿效果zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 波動度預測模型zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) GJR-GARCH模型zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 以高頻率日內資料驗證報酬率與波動度之因果關係-以台灣期貨市場為證zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Use high-frequency data measuring the relationship between returns and volatility with Taiwan futures market dataen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 時間序列分析 總體經濟與財務金融之應用,陳旭昇著zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anderson, T.G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F.X. and Ebens, H.(2001).”The Distribution of Stock Return Volatility.” , Journal of Financial Economics 61(1), 43-76zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anderson, T.G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F.X. and Labys, P.(2003)”Modeling and Forecasting Realized Volatility.”, Econometrica 71, 579-625.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Awartani, B.M.A.,and Corradi, V.(2005).” Predicting the Volatility of the S&P-500 Ttock Index via GARCH Models: The Role of Asymmetries.”, International Journal of Forecasting 21 , 167-183.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bekaert, G., and G. Wu.(2000).”Asymmetric Volatility and Risk in Equity Markets.”, The Review of Financial Studies 13, 1-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Black, F.(1976).”Studies of Stock Price Volatility Changes.”, Proceeding of the 1976 Meetings of the American Statisrical Association, Business and Economic Statistics PP. 177-181.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bollerslev, T.,(1986). ”Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskeasticity”, Journal of Econometrics 31, 307-327zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bollerslev, T., Litvinova, J., and Tauchen, G.(2006).”Leverage and Volatility Feedback Effects in High-Frequency Data.”, Journal of Financial Econometrics 4, 353-384.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Campbell, J.Y., and L. Hentscel.(1992).”No News is Good News: An Asymmetric Model of Changing Volatility in Stock Returns.” , Journal of Financial Economics 31, 281-331.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Christie, A.C.(1982).”The Stochastic Behavior of Common Stock Variances – Value, Leverage and Interest Rate Effects.” , Journal of Financial Economics 3, 145-166.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duffee, G.R.(1995).”Stock Returns and Volatility , A Firm–level analysis.”, Journal of Financial Economics 37, 399-420.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dufour, J.M., Garcia, R., and Taamouti, A.(2008)”Measuring Causality Between Volatility and Returns with High-Frequency Data.”, Working Paper, Department of Econometircs, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Figlewski, S., and X. Wang.(2001).”Is the ‘Leverage Effect’ a Leverage Effect?”, Working paper, Department of Finance, New York University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) French, K.R., Schwert, G.W. and Stambaugh, R.F.(1987).”Expected Stock Returns and Volatility.” , Journal of Financial Economics 19, 3-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ghysels, E., Santa-Clara, P. and Valkanov, R.(2005).”There is a Risk-Return Tradeoff After All.” , Journal of Financial Economics 76, 509-548.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Glosten, L.R., R. Jagannathan, and D.E. Runkle(1993).”On the Relation Between the Expected Value and the Volatility of the Nominal Excess Return on Stocks.”, Journal of Finance 48, 1779-1801.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Guan, W.(2004).” Forecasting Volatility.”, Journal of Futures Markets 25, 465-490.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kisinbay, T.(2003).” Predictive Ability of Asymmetric Volatility Models at Medium-Term Horizons.”, IMF Working Paper, 03/131.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Poon, S.H., and Granger, C.W.J.(2003).”Forecasting Volatility in Financial Markets: A Review.”, Journal of Economic Literature 41, 478-539.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Masset, P.(2008)”Properties of High Frequency DAX Returns: Intraday patterns, Jumps and their Impact on Subsequent Volatility.”, Working Paper, Department of Finance and Accounting, University of Fribourg.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mcmillan, D.G., and Speight, A.E.H.(2003).” Asymmetric Volatility Dynamics in High Frequency FTSE-100 Stock Index Futures.”, Applied Financial Economics 13, 599-607zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nelson, Daniel B.(1991).”Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach.”, Econometrica 59, 347-370.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wu, G.(2001).”The Determinants of Asymmetric Volatility.”, Review of Financial Studies 14,837-859.zh_TW