Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

Title個人隱私揭露意願之推論
Intention reasoning of personal privacy disclosure
Creator吳建輝
Wu, Chien Hui
Contributor胡毓忠
Hu, Yuh Jong
吳建輝
Wu, Chien Hui
Key Words語意網
Date2009
Date Issued8-Dec-2010 02:00:30 (UTC+8)
Summary對社會網路而言,使用者對使用者之間的隱私揭露會有不同程度的意願,然而目前的社會網路並沒有提供使用者一個良好的環境去撰寫屬於自己的隱私揭露規則。W3C對於Web Privacy的部份提出了P3P這個解決方案。此研究利用W3C所發佈的P3P與APPEL做為基礎平台讓使用者去撰寫屬於自己的隱私揭露規則,以控制使用者的隱私資料;而由於P3P與APPEL的設計並不具有語意,所以加入Semantic Web使其不會產生語意模糊不清的情況。而為了能讓使用者快速的瞭解一個人之可信任程度,本研究以Google的Page Rank演算法進行修改,設計一名為個人信任指數 (Personal Trust Rank,PTR)找出此平台中任一人之可信任的指數,以此去評估一個人是否是可信任狀態;最後找出兩個人之間的隱私揭露是否產生衝突,同時讓使用者可利用PTR設立門檻以達到Access Control之能力,據此以達成保護個人隱私之目標。
In the social network, people have different privacy disclosure intention. However, it is not an easy way for a user to declare his/her own privacy disclosure policy, we adopt the P3P/APPEL languages to solve this problem. A user"s privacy policy is shown as APPEL and a server’s privacy declaration statement is expressed as P3P. However, P3P and APPEL are XML-based so they might have semantic inconsistency and ambiguity in the privacy policy representations. We resolve these issues by using the semantic web technologies to enable the privacy policy enforcement. To decide whether a person is trustworthy, we modify the Google"s Page Rank algorithm for Personal Trust Rank ( PTR ) to evaluate a person’s trust. Finally a reasoning engine is used to find out if there are any privacy disclosure inconsistencies between users.
參考文獻 [1] A.F. Westin,”Science,Privacy,and Freedom: Issues and Proposals for the 1970.”,Columbia Law Review,1966
[2] A.I. Anton, Ninghui Li, Ting Yu. “A Semantic-Based Approach to Privacy Languages.” Technical Report TR 2003-28, CERIAS, November 2003.
[3] AT&T “Privacy Bird.” http://privacybird.com
[4] C. Duma, A. Herzog, N. Shahmehri. “Privacy in the SemanticWeb: What Policy Languages Have to Offer”. Eighth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, 2007
[5] L. Cranor , M. Langheinrich and M. Marchiori“A P3P Preference Exchange Language 1.0 (APPEL 1.0),” W3C Working Draft, www.w3.org/TR/P3P-preferences, April 15, 2002
[6] D. N. Jutla, P. Bodorik, Y. Zhang,”PeCAN: An architecture for users’ privacy-aware electronic commerce contexts on the semantic web”,Information Systems,2006,Vol. 31,pp. 295-320
[7] D. Simon,”Europe to US: No Privacy,No trade.”,Wired Magazine,1998,http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/6.05/europe_pr.html
[8] H. Hochheiser,”The Platform for privacy preference as a social protocol: An examination within the U.S. policy context”,ACM Transactions on Internet Technology,November 2002,Vol. 2,No. 4
[9] Horrocks, I., et al., “OWL rules: A proposal and prototype implementation” Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 3. 2005, pp. 23-40.
[10] Horrocks, I., et al. “SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML.” , Acknowledged W3C Member Submission,MAY 21,2004
[11] John R. Searle,”Speech acts:an essay in the philosophy of language”,Cambridge University Press,1969
[12] K. Cameron,”The Laws of Identity.”,Architect of Identity,Microsoft Corporation,2005,http://www.identityblog.com
[13] L. Kagal. “Rei: A policy language for the me-centric project.“Technical report, HP Laboratories Palo Alto, September 2002.
[14] L. Kagal, T. Finin, and A. Joshi. “A policy-based approach to security for the semantic web.” 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’03), LNCS 2870, pages 402–418.
[15] L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, T. “The PageRank citation rank-
ing: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies
[16] Mary J. Culnan,”Protecting Privacy Online: Is Self-Regulation Working?”,Journal of Public Policy & Marketing,2000,Vol. 19,pp. 20-26
[17] M. K. Smith, C. Wetly, D. L. McGuiness,”OWL Web Ontology Language Guide.”,World Wide Web Consortium,2004,http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/
[18] P. Kolari, L. Ding, S. Ganjugunte, L. Kagal, A. Joshi, and T. Finin. “Enhancing Web Privacy Protection through Declarative Policies”. Eighth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks,2005
[19] R. Agrawal, J. Kiernan, R. Srikant, Yirong Xu,”An XPath-based Preference Language for P3P.”, 12th international conference on World Wide Web,2003,pages 629-639
[20] R.O. Marson,”Four ethical issues of the information age”,Management Information Systems Quarterly,1986,Vol. 10,No. 1, pp. 5-12
[21] S. Warren,L.D. Brandeis,”The Right to Privacy”,Harvard Law Review,1890
[22] The friend of a friend(FOAF) project,” http://www.foaf-project.org/
[23] T.R Gruber,”A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications”, Knowledge Acquisition, 1993, Vol.5,pp.199—220
[24] W3C. “Platform for Privacy Preferences (P3P) Project”.
http://www.w3.org/P3P
[25] W3C.” Rules Interchange Format Working Group”.
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg
Description碩士
國立政治大學
資訊科學學系
96753029
98
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096753029
Typethesis
dc.contributor.advisor 胡毓忠zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Hu, Yuh Jongen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 吳建輝zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wu, Chien Huien_US
dc.creator (作者) 吳建輝zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Wu, Chien Huien_US
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 8-Dec-2010 02:00:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 8-Dec-2010 02:00:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 8-Dec-2010 02:00:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0096753029en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49165-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 資訊科學學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96753029zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 對社會網路而言,使用者對使用者之間的隱私揭露會有不同程度的意願,然而目前的社會網路並沒有提供使用者一個良好的環境去撰寫屬於自己的隱私揭露規則。W3C對於Web Privacy的部份提出了P3P這個解決方案。此研究利用W3C所發佈的P3P與APPEL做為基礎平台讓使用者去撰寫屬於自己的隱私揭露規則,以控制使用者的隱私資料;而由於P3P與APPEL的設計並不具有語意,所以加入Semantic Web使其不會產生語意模糊不清的情況。而為了能讓使用者快速的瞭解一個人之可信任程度,本研究以Google的Page Rank演算法進行修改,設計一名為個人信任指數 (Personal Trust Rank,PTR)找出此平台中任一人之可信任的指數,以此去評估一個人是否是可信任狀態;最後找出兩個人之間的隱私揭露是否產生衝突,同時讓使用者可利用PTR設立門檻以達到Access Control之能力,據此以達成保護個人隱私之目標。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In the social network, people have different privacy disclosure intention. However, it is not an easy way for a user to declare his/her own privacy disclosure policy, we adopt the P3P/APPEL languages to solve this problem. A user"s privacy policy is shown as APPEL and a server’s privacy declaration statement is expressed as P3P. However, P3P and APPEL are XML-based so they might have semantic inconsistency and ambiguity in the privacy policy representations. We resolve these issues by using the semantic web technologies to enable the privacy policy enforcement. To decide whether a person is trustworthy, we modify the Google"s Page Rank algorithm for Personal Trust Rank ( PTR ) to evaluate a person’s trust. Finally a reasoning engine is used to find out if there are any privacy disclosure inconsistencies between users.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 導論 9
     1.1研究動機 9
     1.2 研究目的 10
     1.3各章節概述 12
     第二章 研究背景 13
     2.1 隱私權 13
     2.2 隱私偏好平台(P3P) 13
     2.3 P3P隱私偏好交換平台(APPEL) 15
     2.4 本體論 17
     2.5 規則語言 18
     2.5 朋友的朋友 19
     第三章 相關研究 21
     3.1 以XPath為基礎的P3P偏好語言:XPref 21
     3.2 以語意為基礎的P3P偏好語言:SemPref 23
     第四章 方法架構設計 25
     4.1研究架構 25
     4.2研究方法 29
     4.2.1 P3P與APPEL之問題 29
     4.2.2個人信任指數 ( Personal Trust Rank,PTR) 34
     4.2.3建構本體論 38
     4.2.4 以SWRL找出雙方之衝突 41
     4.2.5 SWRL Built-Ins 43
     第五章 執行模型與系統實作 46
     5.1 設計模型 46
     5.2 環境需求 47
     5.3 Protégé實作本體論及規則 48
     5.4 Web情境模擬 50
     第六章 結論與未來展望 53
     參考文獻 54
     附錄 57
     1.目的(Purpose)類別、物件類別屬性及資料類別屬性: 57
     2.使用者(RECIPINET)類別、物件類別屬性及資料類別屬性: 58
     3.保留期限(RETENTION)類別、物件類別屬性及資料類別屬性: 59
     4.資料(DATA)類別、物件類別屬性及資料類別屬性: 60
     5.規範(POLICY)類別、物件類別屬性及資料類別屬性: 60
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096753029en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 語意網zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 個人隱私揭露意願之推論zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Intention reasoning of personal privacy disclosureen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [1] A.F. Westin,”Science,Privacy,and Freedom: Issues and Proposals for the 1970.”,Columbia Law Review,1966zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [2] A.I. Anton, Ninghui Li, Ting Yu. “A Semantic-Based Approach to Privacy Languages.” Technical Report TR 2003-28, CERIAS, November 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [3] AT&T “Privacy Bird.” http://privacybird.comzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [4] C. Duma, A. Herzog, N. Shahmehri. “Privacy in the SemanticWeb: What Policy Languages Have to Offer”. Eighth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, 2007zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [5] L. Cranor , M. Langheinrich and M. Marchiori“A P3P Preference Exchange Language 1.0 (APPEL 1.0),” W3C Working Draft, www.w3.org/TR/P3P-preferences, April 15, 2002zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [6] D. N. Jutla, P. Bodorik, Y. Zhang,”PeCAN: An architecture for users’ privacy-aware electronic commerce contexts on the semantic web”,Information Systems,2006,Vol. 31,pp. 295-320zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [7] D. Simon,”Europe to US: No Privacy,No trade.”,Wired Magazine,1998,http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/6.05/europe_pr.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [8] H. Hochheiser,”The Platform for privacy preference as a social protocol: An examination within the U.S. policy context”,ACM Transactions on Internet Technology,November 2002,Vol. 2,No. 4zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [9] Horrocks, I., et al., “OWL rules: A proposal and prototype implementation” Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 3. 2005, pp. 23-40.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [10] Horrocks, I., et al. “SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML.” , Acknowledged W3C Member Submission,MAY 21,2004zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [11] John R. Searle,”Speech acts:an essay in the philosophy of language”,Cambridge University Press,1969zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [12] K. Cameron,”The Laws of Identity.”,Architect of Identity,Microsoft Corporation,2005,http://www.identityblog.comzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [13] L. Kagal. “Rei: A policy language for the me-centric project.“Technical report, HP Laboratories Palo Alto, September 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [14] L. Kagal, T. Finin, and A. Joshi. “A policy-based approach to security for the semantic web.” 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’03), LNCS 2870, pages 402–418.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [15] L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, T. “The PageRank citation rank-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ing: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologieszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [16] Mary J. Culnan,”Protecting Privacy Online: Is Self-Regulation Working?”,Journal of Public Policy & Marketing,2000,Vol. 19,pp. 20-26zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [17] M. K. Smith, C. Wetly, D. L. McGuiness,”OWL Web Ontology Language Guide.”,World Wide Web Consortium,2004,http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [18] P. Kolari, L. Ding, S. Ganjugunte, L. Kagal, A. Joshi, and T. Finin. “Enhancing Web Privacy Protection through Declarative Policies”. Eighth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks,2005zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [19] R. Agrawal, J. Kiernan, R. Srikant, Yirong Xu,”An XPath-based Preference Language for P3P.”, 12th international conference on World Wide Web,2003,pages 629-639zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [20] R.O. Marson,”Four ethical issues of the information age”,Management Information Systems Quarterly,1986,Vol. 10,No. 1, pp. 5-12zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [21] S. Warren,L.D. Brandeis,”The Right to Privacy”,Harvard Law Review,1890zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [22] The friend of a friend(FOAF) project,” http://www.foaf-project.org/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [23] T.R Gruber,”A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications”, Knowledge Acquisition, 1993, Vol.5,pp.199—220zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [24] W3C. “Platform for Privacy Preferences (P3P) Project”.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.w3.org/P3Pzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [25] W3C.” Rules Interchange Format Working Group”.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wgzh_TW