學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 影響家務分工因素之探討:台灣與南韓之比較研究
Factors affecting the household division of labor:Comparative Study of Taiwan and South Korea
作者 劉淑鳳
貢獻者 張峯彬
劉淑鳳
關鍵詞 比較研究
家務分工
性別角色論
時間可利用論
相對資源論
性別展現
日期 2009
上傳時間 8-Dec-2010 02:02:08 (UTC+8)
摘要 在東亞急遽的社會變遷過程中,台灣和南韓同樣面臨了快速工業化的衝擊,以及近年來社會文化的漸趨民主開放,或是女性經濟角色的大幅提升與女性意識的覺醒,皆可能帶來社會性別規範的鬆動,然而家庭內的性別分工並未有相對應的平等化現象,讓人不禁要問:家務為什麼仍然是女性的工作?
      本研究主要以台灣和南韓已婚者為研究對象,試圖利用性別角色論(gender role theory)、時間可利用論(time available theory)與相對資源論(relative resource theory)等不同的觀點來解釋台灣和南韓社會中兩性參與家務分工的差異。本研究使用來自行政院國家科學委員會資助之「台灣地區社會變遷調查」1996年第三期第二次東亞組調查,以及同一份問卷由韓國延世大學社會發展研究所和美國芝加哥大學,在韓國共同合作蒐集而來的二筆資料,作為實證比較研究分析的基礎。
      本研究的結果發現,在比較台灣和南韓家務參與比例的各種影響因素中,性別角色態度、相對工時與經濟依賴程度分別扮演了重要的角色:(1)台灣和南韓已婚男性的性別角色態度愈趨平權,其參與家務的比例愈高;台灣和南韓已婚女性的性別角色態度愈趨平權,其參與家務的比例愈低。(2)在相對資源方面,台灣已婚男性基本上遵照「交換原則」的行為模式,以經濟資源作為籌碼在家務工作的協商上,擁有較多經濟資源者,也就相對具有較多優勢在減少家務工作的時間上。(3)台灣已婚女性符合了「性別展現模型」的預測,其經濟依賴程度與參與家務比例之間呈U字型(曲線關係),亦即負擔家計的女性非但不是以掌握較多經濟資源的優勢而少做家事,反倒是以多做家事來凸顯其女性特質的家庭角色。(4)南韓已婚男性和已婚女性大致上則依循「分配原則」的行為模式,夫妻雙方會在家庭及工作之間,將時間作最有效能的分配。
參考文獻 一、中文
元世一,〈首爾人工作時間世界第二長〉,《朝鮮日報》。2009年8月21日,from http://chn.chosun.com/big5/site/data/html_dir/2009/08/21/20090821000015.html
申晶善,〈調查顯示男人失業也不願幹家務〉,《朝鮮日報》。2009年2月23日,from http://chinese.chosun.com/big5/site/data/html_dir/2009/02/23/20090223000024.html
朴秀美,1993,〈中韓兩國都市夫妻性別角色態度、角色期待及角色扮演之比較研究〉。中國文化大學家政學研究所碩士論文。
行政院主計處,2004,《性別統計─與女性議題有關之統計專題分析:工作與家庭》。台北:行政院主計處。
行政院主計處,2004,《台灣地區時間運用調查報告》。台北:行政院主計處。
行政院主計處,2005,〈女性勞動力參與率概況〉。《國情統計通報》。台北:行政院主計處。
行政院主計處,2009,〈臺灣地區歷年婚姻狀況別之勞動力參與率〉。台北:行政院主計處。
呂玉瑕、伊慶春,2005,〈社會變遷中的夫妻資源與家務分工:台灣七〇年代與九〇年代社會文化脈絡的比較〉。《台灣社會學刊》10:41-94。
李美玲、楊亞潔、伊慶春,2000,〈家務分工:就業現實還是平等理念?〉。《台灣社會學刊》24:59-88。
金正薰,〈OECD中韓國男女工資差異最大〉,《朝鮮日報》。2009年7月10日,from http://chinese.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2009/07/10/20090710000033.html
唐先梅,1997,〈家事分工理論模型─從層級觀點的思索〉。《空中大學生活科學學報》3:63-90。
唐先梅,2001,〈雙薪家庭夫妻在不同家務項目之分工情形及個人影響因素〉。《空中大學生活科學學報》7:105-131。
唐先梅,2003,〈雙薪家庭夫妻家務分工及家務公平觀之研究-都會區與非都會區之比較〉。《臺灣鄉村研究》1:109-139。
張志堯,2003,〈雙薪家庭中階級與夫妻權力關係之探討〉。《應用心理研究》17:187-221。
張晉芬、黃玟娟,2003,〈兩性分工觀念下婚育對女性就業的影響〉。《女性‧國家‧照顧工作》227-251。台北:女書文化。
張晉芬、李奕慧,2007,〈「女人的家事」、「男人的家事」:家事分工性別化的持續與解釋〉。《人文及社會科學集刊》19(2):203-229。
陳玉華、伊慶春、呂玉瑕,2000,〈婦女家庭地位之研究:以家庭決策模式為例〉。《台灣社會學刊》24:1-38。
莫藜藜,1997,〈已婚男性家庭事務分工態度之研究〉。《東吳社會工作學報》3:117-156。
喻維欣,2003,〈第10章:家庭〉,收錄於王振寰、瞿海源主編之《社會學與台灣社會》。台北:巨流。
黃朗文,1998,〈已婚兩性對家務分工意識形態之研究〉。《東吳社會學報》7:81-111。
扈貞煥,2006,《韓國的民俗與文化》。台北:台灣商務出版社。
董向榮,2009,《南韓—創造奇蹟》。香港:香港城市大學出版社。
熊瑞梅、周顏玲,1998,〈台灣已婚勞工家務分工不平等的影響因素與意涵〉。台灣的人口與相關現象學術研討會,台灣大學人口研究中心。
蔡明璋,2002,〈權力、性別意識、親密關係與家務分工〉。台灣社會學會2002年年會論文。
廖年淼,2003,〈台灣與南韓政經背景與職業教育發展型態之比較分析〉。《技術及職業教育》75:20-28。
賴爾柔、黃馨慧,1996,〈已婚男性參與家事分工之研究〉。《婦女與兩性研究通訊》
41:10-18。
劉錦添、江錫九,1997,〈台灣有偶婦女時間分配型態之實證研究〉。《人文及社會
科學集刊》9:1-29。
蕭英玲,2005,〈台灣的家務分工:經濟依賴及性別的影響〉。《台灣社會學刊》34:115-145。
羅啟宏,1992,〈台灣省鄉鎮發展類型之研究〉。《台灣經濟》190:41-68。
二、外文
이기영、김외숙、伊藤純, 2001, 한일 근로자부부의 가사노동분담.이기영 외,한국과 일본의 생할시간 비교연구. 서울대학교출판부.
이기영、堀內かおる, 2001, 한일 근로자가정의 식생할 관련가사노동.이기영 외,한국과 일본의 생할시간 비교연구. 서울대학교출판부.
Becker, Gary S., 1991, A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bergen, Elizabeth, 1990, “The Multidimensional Nature of Domestic Labor: An Investigation of Husbands’ Participation. ” Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, NSFH Working for Paper No. 36.
Berk, Fenstermaker Sarah, 1985, The Gender Factory: The Apportionment of Work in American Households. NY and London: Plenum Press.
Brines, Juile, 1994, ”Economic Dependence, Gender, and the Division of Labor at Home.” American Journal of Sociology 100(3):652-688.
Brinton, Mary, 2001,Women’s Working Lives in East Asia, edited by Mary C. Brinton. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Brinton, Mary, Yean-Ju Lee, and William Parish , 1995, “Married Women’s Employment in Rapidly Industrializing Societies:Examples from East Asia.” American Journal of Sociology 100:1099-1130.
Chapman, Tony, 2004, Gender and Domestic Life:Changing Practices in Families and Households. New York:Palgrave.
Chin-fen Change, 2006, ”Explanations of Gender-Based Household Labor Division:Across-National Study.” Japanese Journal of Family Sociology, 17(2):81-94.
Clement, W., &Myles, J. Relations of ruling class:Class and Gender in postindustrial societies. Montréal:McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Coltrane, Scott, 2000, “Research on Household Labor:Modeling and Measuring the Social Embeddedness of Routine Family Work.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 62:1208-1233.
Chafetz, Janet and Jacqueline, Hagan, 1996, “The Gender Division of Labor and Family Change in Industrial Societies: A Theoretical Accounting.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 27:187-219.
Davis, Shannon N. and Theodore N.Greenstein,2009. “Gender Ideology: Components, Predictors, and Consequences.”Annual Review of Sociology 35:87-105.
Diefenbach , Heike, 2002,”Gender Ideologies, Relative Resources, and the Division of
Housework in Intimate Relationships: A Test of Hyman Rodman` s Theory of
Resources in Cultural Context.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 43:
45-64.
Dogan, Mattei, 2002, “Strategies in Comparative Sociology.” Comparative Sociology 1(1):63-92.
Fengbin Chang, 2006, Gender Differences: Becoming Self-employed in Taiwan and Korea. Thesis (Ph.D.). The University of Chicago.
Fuwa, Makiko, 2004, “Macro-Level Gender Inequality and the Division of Household Labor in 22 Countries.” American Sociological Review 69(6):751-767.
Greenstein, Theodore N., 1996,” Husbands` Participation in Domestic Labor: Interactive Effects of Wives` and Husbands` Gender Ideologies. Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:585-595.
Greenstein, Theodore N., 2000, ”Economic Dependence, Gender, and the Division of Labor in the home:A Replication and Extension.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 62:322-335.
Haggard, Stephan, 1990,Pathways from the Periphery:The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries. Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
Hiller, Dana V, 1984, “Power Dependence and Division of Family Work. ” Sex Roles 10(11/12):1003-1019.
Hochschild, Arlie, 1989, The Second Shift:Working Parents and the Revolution at Home.New York:Viking.
Huber, J. and G. Spitze , 1983, Sex Stratification: Children, Housework, and Jobs. New
York: Academic Press.
Iwai, Noriko,2009, ”Housework in Japan:In Comparison with Taiwan, Korea, and China based on the Eass 2006 data." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting.
Kroska A.,2004, “Divisions of domestic work: revising and expanding the theoretical explanations.“J. Fam.Issues25:900-32.
Maret, E. and B. Finlay , 1984, The Distribution of Household Labor among Women in Dual-Earner Families. Journal of Marriage and Family 46(2): 357-364.
Nakhaie, M. R.,2002, “Class, Breadwinner Ideology, and Housework Among Canadian Husbands.” Review of Radical Political Economics 34:137-157.
Presser, B. Harriet, 2003, Working in a 24/7 Economy:Challenges for American Families. Russell Sage Foundation:New York.
Pusanweb.com 2005.http://www.pusanweb.com/food/index.htm?/food/foodmain.htm.
Rexroat, Cynthia and Contance Shehan, 1987, “The Family Life Cycle and Spouses’ Time in Housework” Journal of Marriage and the Family 49:737-750.
Rodman, H. ,1967,”Marital Power in France, Greece, Yugoslavia, and the United States:
A Cross-National Discussion.” Journal of Marriage and Family 29(2): 320-324.
Rodman, H. ,1972, “Marital Power and the Theory of Resource in Culture Context.” Journal
of Comparative Family Studies 3: 50-67.
Sanchez, Laura, 1994, “Material Resources, Family Structure Resources, and Husbands’ Housework Participation: A Cross-National Companion. ” Journal of Family Issues, 15(3):379-402.
Shelton, B.A. and John, D. ,1996,”The division of household labor.”Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299-322.
Sørensen, Annemette and Sara McLanahan, 1987, “Married Women’s Economic Dependency, 1940-1980.” American Journal of Sociology 93:659-687.
South, Scott J. and Glenna Spitze, 1994, “Housework in Marital and Nonmarital Households.” American Sociology Review 59:327-347.
Tang Wenfang and William L. Parish, 2000, Chinese urban life under reform : the changing social contract. Cambridge University Press.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
社會學研究所
97254017
98
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097254017
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 張峯彬zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 劉淑鳳zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 劉淑鳳zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 8-Dec-2010 02:02:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 8-Dec-2010 02:02:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 8-Dec-2010 02:02:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0097254017en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49217-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 社會學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97254017zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在東亞急遽的社會變遷過程中,台灣和南韓同樣面臨了快速工業化的衝擊,以及近年來社會文化的漸趨民主開放,或是女性經濟角色的大幅提升與女性意識的覺醒,皆可能帶來社會性別規範的鬆動,然而家庭內的性別分工並未有相對應的平等化現象,讓人不禁要問:家務為什麼仍然是女性的工作?
      本研究主要以台灣和南韓已婚者為研究對象,試圖利用性別角色論(gender role theory)、時間可利用論(time available theory)與相對資源論(relative resource theory)等不同的觀點來解釋台灣和南韓社會中兩性參與家務分工的差異。本研究使用來自行政院國家科學委員會資助之「台灣地區社會變遷調查」1996年第三期第二次東亞組調查,以及同一份問卷由韓國延世大學社會發展研究所和美國芝加哥大學,在韓國共同合作蒐集而來的二筆資料,作為實證比較研究分析的基礎。
      本研究的結果發現,在比較台灣和南韓家務參與比例的各種影響因素中,性別角色態度、相對工時與經濟依賴程度分別扮演了重要的角色:(1)台灣和南韓已婚男性的性別角色態度愈趨平權,其參與家務的比例愈高;台灣和南韓已婚女性的性別角色態度愈趨平權,其參與家務的比例愈低。(2)在相對資源方面,台灣已婚男性基本上遵照「交換原則」的行為模式,以經濟資源作為籌碼在家務工作的協商上,擁有較多經濟資源者,也就相對具有較多優勢在減少家務工作的時間上。(3)台灣已婚女性符合了「性別展現模型」的預測,其經濟依賴程度與參與家務比例之間呈U字型(曲線關係),亦即負擔家計的女性非但不是以掌握較多經濟資源的優勢而少做家事,反倒是以多做家事來凸顯其女性特質的家庭角色。(4)南韓已婚男性和已婚女性大致上則依循「分配原則」的行為模式,夫妻雙方會在家庭及工作之間,將時間作最有效能的分配。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
     第二章 文獻探討 6
     第一節、家務分工相關統計資料.. 6
     第二節、家務工作的定義 6
     第三節、家務分工的相關理論 7
     第三章 研究設計 15
     第一節、資料來源 15
     第二節、變項操作及測量 16
     第三節、分析方法 21
     第四節、研究假設與研究架構 21
     第四章 研究發現 23
     第一節、台灣和南韓家務分工的描述統計 23
     第二節、多元迴歸分析 27
     第五章 結論 35
     第一節、結論與討論 35
     第二節、研究限制 36
     
     附錄一 38
     附錄二 40
     附錄三 41
     附錄四 42
     參考文獻 43
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097254017en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 比較研究zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 家務分工zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 性別角色論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 時間可利用論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 相對資源論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 性別展現zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 影響家務分工因素之探討:台灣與南韓之比較研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Factors affecting the household division of labor:Comparative Study of Taiwan and South Koreaen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 元世一,〈首爾人工作時間世界第二長〉,《朝鮮日報》。2009年8月21日,from http://chn.chosun.com/big5/site/data/html_dir/2009/08/21/20090821000015.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 申晶善,〈調查顯示男人失業也不願幹家務〉,《朝鮮日報》。2009年2月23日,from http://chinese.chosun.com/big5/site/data/html_dir/2009/02/23/20090223000024.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 朴秀美,1993,〈中韓兩國都市夫妻性別角色態度、角色期待及角色扮演之比較研究〉。中國文化大學家政學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 行政院主計處,2004,《性別統計─與女性議題有關之統計專題分析:工作與家庭》。台北:行政院主計處。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 行政院主計處,2004,《台灣地區時間運用調查報告》。台北:行政院主計處。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 行政院主計處,2005,〈女性勞動力參與率概況〉。《國情統計通報》。台北:行政院主計處。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 行政院主計處,2009,〈臺灣地區歷年婚姻狀況別之勞動力參與率〉。台北:行政院主計處。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 呂玉瑕、伊慶春,2005,〈社會變遷中的夫妻資源與家務分工:台灣七〇年代與九〇年代社會文化脈絡的比較〉。《台灣社會學刊》10:41-94。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李美玲、楊亞潔、伊慶春,2000,〈家務分工:就業現實還是平等理念?〉。《台灣社會學刊》24:59-88。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 金正薰,〈OECD中韓國男女工資差異最大〉,《朝鮮日報》。2009年7月10日,from http://chinese.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2009/07/10/20090710000033.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 唐先梅,1997,〈家事分工理論模型─從層級觀點的思索〉。《空中大學生活科學學報》3:63-90。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 唐先梅,2001,〈雙薪家庭夫妻在不同家務項目之分工情形及個人影響因素〉。《空中大學生活科學學報》7:105-131。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 唐先梅,2003,〈雙薪家庭夫妻家務分工及家務公平觀之研究-都會區與非都會區之比較〉。《臺灣鄉村研究》1:109-139。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張志堯,2003,〈雙薪家庭中階級與夫妻權力關係之探討〉。《應用心理研究》17:187-221。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張晉芬、黃玟娟,2003,〈兩性分工觀念下婚育對女性就業的影響〉。《女性‧國家‧照顧工作》227-251。台北:女書文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張晉芬、李奕慧,2007,〈「女人的家事」、「男人的家事」:家事分工性別化的持續與解釋〉。《人文及社會科學集刊》19(2):203-229。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳玉華、伊慶春、呂玉瑕,2000,〈婦女家庭地位之研究:以家庭決策模式為例〉。《台灣社會學刊》24:1-38。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 莫藜藜,1997,〈已婚男性家庭事務分工態度之研究〉。《東吳社會工作學報》3:117-156。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 喻維欣,2003,〈第10章:家庭〉,收錄於王振寰、瞿海源主編之《社會學與台灣社會》。台北:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃朗文,1998,〈已婚兩性對家務分工意識形態之研究〉。《東吳社會學報》7:81-111。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 扈貞煥,2006,《韓國的民俗與文化》。台北:台灣商務出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 董向榮,2009,《南韓—創造奇蹟》。香港:香港城市大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 熊瑞梅、周顏玲,1998,〈台灣已婚勞工家務分工不平等的影響因素與意涵〉。台灣的人口與相關現象學術研討會,台灣大學人口研究中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡明璋,2002,〈權力、性別意識、親密關係與家務分工〉。台灣社會學會2002年年會論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 廖年淼,2003,〈台灣與南韓政經背景與職業教育發展型態之比較分析〉。《技術及職業教育》75:20-28。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 賴爾柔、黃馨慧,1996,〈已婚男性參與家事分工之研究〉。《婦女與兩性研究通訊》zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 41:10-18。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉錦添、江錫九,1997,〈台灣有偶婦女時間分配型態之實證研究〉。《人文及社會zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 科學集刊》9:1-29。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蕭英玲,2005,〈台灣的家務分工:經濟依賴及性別的影響〉。《台灣社會學刊》34:115-145。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 羅啟宏,1992,〈台灣省鄉鎮發展類型之研究〉。《台灣經濟》190:41-68。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、外文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 이기영、김외숙、伊藤純, 2001, 한일 근로자부부의 가사노동분담.이기영 외,한국과 일본의 생할시간 비교연구. 서울대학교출판부.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 이기영、堀內かおる, 2001, 한일 근로자가정의 식생할 관련가사노동.이기영 외,한국과 일본의 생할시간 비교연구. 서울대학교출판부.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Becker, Gary S., 1991, A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bergen, Elizabeth, 1990, “The Multidimensional Nature of Domestic Labor: An Investigation of Husbands’ Participation. ” Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, NSFH Working for Paper No. 36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Berk, Fenstermaker Sarah, 1985, The Gender Factory: The Apportionment of Work in American Households. NY and London: Plenum Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brines, Juile, 1994, ”Economic Dependence, Gender, and the Division of Labor at Home.” American Journal of Sociology 100(3):652-688.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brinton, Mary, 2001,Women’s Working Lives in East Asia, edited by Mary C. Brinton. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brinton, Mary, Yean-Ju Lee, and William Parish , 1995, “Married Women’s Employment in Rapidly Industrializing Societies:Examples from East Asia.” American Journal of Sociology 100:1099-1130.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chapman, Tony, 2004, Gender and Domestic Life:Changing Practices in Families and Households. New York:Palgrave.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chin-fen Change, 2006, ”Explanations of Gender-Based Household Labor Division:Across-National Study.” Japanese Journal of Family Sociology, 17(2):81-94.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Clement, W., &Myles, J. Relations of ruling class:Class and Gender in postindustrial societies. Montréal:McGill-Queen’s University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Coltrane, Scott, 2000, “Research on Household Labor:Modeling and Measuring the Social Embeddedness of Routine Family Work.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 62:1208-1233.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chafetz, Janet and Jacqueline, Hagan, 1996, “The Gender Division of Labor and Family Change in Industrial Societies: A Theoretical Accounting.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 27:187-219.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Davis, Shannon N. and Theodore N.Greenstein,2009. “Gender Ideology: Components, Predictors, and Consequences.”Annual Review of Sociology 35:87-105.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Diefenbach , Heike, 2002,”Gender Ideologies, Relative Resources, and the Division ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Housework in Intimate Relationships: A Test of Hyman Rodman` s Theory ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Resources in Cultural Context.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 43:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 45-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dogan, Mattei, 2002, “Strategies in Comparative Sociology.” Comparative Sociology 1(1):63-92.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fengbin Chang, 2006, Gender Differences: Becoming Self-employed in Taiwan and Korea. Thesis (Ph.D.). The University of Chicago.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fuwa, Makiko, 2004, “Macro-Level Gender Inequality and the Division of Household Labor in 22 Countries.” American Sociological Review 69(6):751-767.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Greenstein, Theodore N., 1996,” Husbands` Participation in Domestic Labor: Interactive Effects of Wives` and Husbands` Gender Ideologies. Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:585-595.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Greenstein, Theodore N., 2000, ”Economic Dependence, Gender, and the Division of Labor in the home:A Replication and Extension.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 62:322-335.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haggard, Stephan, 1990,Pathways from the Periphery:The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries. Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hiller, Dana V, 1984, “Power Dependence and Division of Family Work. ” Sex Roles 10(11/12):1003-1019.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hochschild, Arlie, 1989, The Second Shift:Working Parents and the Revolution at Home.New York:Viking.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Huber, J. and G. Spitze , 1983, Sex Stratification: Children, Housework, and Jobs. Newzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Iwai, Noriko,2009, ”Housework in Japan:In Comparison with Taiwan, Korea, and China based on the Eass 2006 data." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kroska A.,2004, “Divisions of domestic work: revising and expanding the theoretical explanations.“J. Fam.Issues25:900-32.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Maret, E. and B. Finlay , 1984, The Distribution of Household Labor among Women in Dual-Earner Families. Journal of Marriage and Family 46(2): 357-364.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nakhaie, M. R.,2002, “Class, Breadwinner Ideology, and Housework Among Canadian Husbands.” Review of Radical Political Economics 34:137-157.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Presser, B. Harriet, 2003, Working in a 24/7 Economy:Challenges for American Families. Russell Sage Foundation:New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pusanweb.com 2005.http://www.pusanweb.com/food/index.htm?/food/foodmain.htm.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rexroat, Cynthia and Contance Shehan, 1987, “The Family Life Cycle and Spouses’ Time in Housework” Journal of Marriage and the Family 49:737-750.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rodman, H. ,1967,”Marital Power in France, Greece, Yugoslavia, and the United States:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) A Cross-National Discussion.” Journal of Marriage and Family 29(2): 320-324.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rodman, H. ,1972, “Marital Power and the Theory of Resource in Culture Context.” Journalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) of Comparative Family Studies 3: 50-67.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sanchez, Laura, 1994, “Material Resources, Family Structure Resources, and Husbands’ Housework Participation: A Cross-National Companion. ” Journal of Family Issues, 15(3):379-402.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shelton, B.A. and John, D. ,1996,”The division of household labor.”Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299-322.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sørensen, Annemette and Sara McLanahan, 1987, “Married Women’s Economic Dependency, 1940-1980.” American Journal of Sociology 93:659-687.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) South, Scott J. and Glenna Spitze, 1994, “Housework in Marital and Nonmarital Households.” American Sociology Review 59:327-347.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tang Wenfang and William L. Parish, 2000, Chinese urban life under reform : the changing social contract. Cambridge University Press.zh_TW