Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 國民小學經營效率及影響因素之研究
Efficiency performance and impact factors analyses of elementary schools in Taiwan
作者 方芳蘭
Fang, Fang Lan
貢獻者 秦夢群<br>湯志民
方芳蘭
Fang, Fang Lan
關鍵詞 國民小學
資料包絡分析法
學校效率
elementary school
school efficiency
data envelopment analysis
日期 2009
上傳時間 8-Dec-2010 02:03:37 (UTC+8)
摘要 近年來政府財政資源逐年緊縮,但社會大眾對教育品質之要求與日遽增,繼之以近年來少子化之情形日趨嚴重,國民小學開始衍生學生不足及規模過小問題,導致教育投資無效率的情形發生,因此著重衡量投入與產出關係的經營效率概念,成為未來學校經營的重點。本研究綜合實務及理論之觀察,在考量投入與產出評估之觀點下,經由投入及產出指標之計算,進行我國國民小學經營效率之評估,並探討影響我國國民小學經營效率之各項因素驗證其影響,提出增進學校經營效率之建議與策略。
      本研究評估我國國小經營效率,以台北市75所公立國小為研究樣本,採用97年度國小歲出計畫預算扣除人事費用之預算、教職員人數、校地面積為投入項,國小六年級國語科、數學科基本能力測驗精熟級以上通過人數、各校市級比賽得分、新生報到人數為產出項,並蒐集各校背景及教師素質、家長社經背景及學區因素等變項資料,藉由資料包絡分析法及Tobit迴歸分析,獲得台北市各公立國小之各項效率結果,及影響學校效率之各項因素分析。主要研究發現:(一)台北市國小技術效率表現尚佳。(二)學校普遍出現學生規模不足情形。(三)、學校成本效率表現普遍不佳。(四)效率表現較佳學校具有學生數多、設校時間較短、家長社經背景較佳特徵。(五)學校間學業成就表現差距較小,但各校師生多元表現表現差距較大。(六)在台北市國民小學經營效率調整方面,現有投入水準下產出有不足之情形,在現有產出水準下則有投入有過多之情形。影響學校經營效率之因素方面,學校特性中只有教師性別、學校成員、學校設立時間對學校經營效率有向顯著之影響;學生家長社會經濟背景方面,學校低收入戶及原住民學生比率越高對學校效率有顯著的負面影響,其餘因素影響並不顯著。學區環境部分,學校所處區位都市化程度越高效率越好,位於住宅區之學校效率優於其他各區。針對研究結果,提出下列建議。(一)規模過小學校,宜進行各項資源整合利用。(二)推動教師專業評鑑及落實考核。(三)建立教育績效責任制提升學校效率。(四)國小校務評鑑可同時有量化及質化之評鑑。(五)教育經費編列宜考量學校背景之差異性。(六)建議教育行政機關建立整合電腦資料庫以利未來研究。
Recent year the budget of government is tightening, but our expectation of the educational quality is never less than before. However, the birth rate of Taiwan decreases sharply during decades. It makes the problem that our elementary schools lacking scale of economies are more serious. By literatures reviewing, we find that most of them emphasize on effectiveness of elementary school but efficiency. If we ignore the viewpoint of efficiency, we will not catch the whole-picture of elementary schools’ performance. In this dissertation, we are not only examining the efficiency performance of elementary schools’ but also testing the impact of exogenous variables to efficiency.
      On first stage, We select half of elementary school of Taipei city as our empirical samples, and use data envelopment analysis (DEA)to examine their efficiency performance that include cost efficiency, scale efficiency, technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency ,and allocative efficiency. The result suggests that the sample school have a medium-high technical efficiency performance but poor cost efficiency. Technical efficiency performance is better than allocative and scale efficiency performance. We also confirm a problem that we expect our elementary schools lacking scale of economies. On the second stage, we use Tobit regression method to test our three hypotheses, The empirical result show (1)the evidence support our school characteristic hypothesis that school-specific factors (including the female faculty proportion, teaching experience of teachers, and involvement of teachers) have significant effect to efficiency performance of elementary school.(2) the evidence also support our socioeconomic hypothesis that students’ socioeconomic status (including the family situation and family financial condition) have significant effect to efficiency performance.(3) Our location hypothesis that the school district characteristic (including population density of district and location factor) have significant effect to efficiency performance is supported too.
參考文獻 中文文獻
方德隆(1985)。國民中學組織結構與組織效能關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
王棟良(2003)。台灣省21縣市國民中學學校效率之評估。國立中正大學數學研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
王建正(2003)。國民小學學校經營效率評鑑指標之研究-DEA評鑑模式。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
王國明與顧志遠(1991)。DEA模式在教育評鑑上應用之研究。現代教育,6(1),118-127。
司徒達賢(2002)。非營利組織的經營管理。臺北:天下。
行政院主計處(2009)。政府統計總覽。2009年10月25日,取自hhttp://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp
吳政達( 2004 )。資料包絡分析在高級中學教育監控指標系統之應用。教育研究集刊,50(2),119-145 。
吳政達(2006)。少子化趨勢下國民中小學學校經濟規模政策之研究。教育政策論壇,9(1),23-41。
吳政達( 2008 )。教育政策分析:概念、方法與應用。臺北:高等教育。
吳若詩(2003)。台灣金融控股公司下之銀行經營效率。銘傳大學國際企業研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
Chakraborty, K., Biswas B., & Lewis, W. C.(2001).Measurement of technical efficiency in public education: A stochastic and nonstochastic production function . Approach. Journal of Southern Economic, 67(4),889-905.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E.(1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research ,2(6),429- 444.
Chalos, P., Cherian, J.(1995).An application of data envelopment analysis to public sector performance measurement and accountability. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,14(2),143-160.
Charnes, A., & Cooper, W.W. & Rhodes, E. (1981) . Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Science,27(6),668-97.
Coelli, T. (1994). Assessing the performance of Australian universities using data envelopment analysis. Internal Report, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis,University of New England.
Conroy, J.S. ,&. Arguea, N. M.(2008).An estimation of technical efficiency for Florida public elementary schools. Economics of Education Review ,27, 655–663.
Daft, R. L.(1999). Organization theory and design. Ohio: South-Western College.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1),1-50.
Duncombe, W., Ruggiero, J., & Yinger, J. (1996).Alternative approached to measuring the cost of education. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education. Washington, DC.
Fare, R., Geosskopf, S., & Weber, W.L. (1989). Measuring school district
吳清山(1989)。國民小學管理模式與學校效能之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。台北市。
performance. Public Finance Quarterly, 17(4), 409-428.
Farrell, M. J.(1957). The measurement of productivity efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A(General), 120(3), 253- 281.
Feng, Y. J. , & Lu, K. B. (2004).An AHP/DEA method for measurement of the efficiency of R&D management activities in universities. International Transactions in Operational Research, 11 ( 2),181-201
Fidler,B. ,& Bowles, G.(1991). Effective local management of schools. London:
Longman.
Fukuyama, H. & Weber, W.L. (2002).Evaluating public school district performance via DEA gain functions. Journal of the Operational Research Society , 53, 992–1003.
Golany, B., and Roll ,Y.(1989). An application procedure for DEA, OMEGA, . 17(3),.237-250.
Golany,B. ,& Tamir,E.(1995).Evaluating efficiency-effectiveness-equality trade-
offs: a data envelopment analysis approach,Management Science,41(1), 1172-1184.
Grosskopf ,S. , Hayes, K. J. ,& Taylor L. L.(2009).The relative efficiency of Charter Schools. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80(1), 67-87.
吳清山(2000)。學校績效責任的理念與策略。學校行政雙月刊,6,3-13。
Guthrie, J. W., Garms, W. I. & Pierce, L. C. (1988) . School finance and education policy: Enhancing. educational efficiency, equality, and choice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Hanushek, E. (1995). Interpreting recent research on schooling in developing countries. World Bank Research Observer, 10(2), 227–246.
Hoxby, C. (2000). The effects of class size on student achievement: new evidence from population variation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1239–1285.
Izadi, H., Johnes, G., Oskrochi, R.., & Crouchley, R. (2002). Stochastic frontier estimation of a CES cost function: the case of higher education in Britain. Economics of Education Review, 21(1), 63-71.
Jesson, D., Mayston, D. , & Smith, P. (1987). Performance assessment in the education sector: educational and economic perspectives. Oxford Review of Educational, 13(3), 249-266.
Jones, A. (2001). Recent findings in the economics of education reform and prospective work at the the Jim Self Center on the future, Clemon, SC: Clemson University.
Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P.(1992).The balanced scorecard - Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review,70(1), 71-79.
Karen, A.(1995).Does class size matter? .Economics of Education Review. 14(3),229-241.
Kirjavainen, T. & Loikkanenta, H. A.(1998). Efficiency differences of Finnish senior secondary schools:An Application of DEA and Tobit analysis. Economics of Education Review , 17(4),377-394.
Krueger, A. B. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production functions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 497–532.
吳清山、蔡菁芝(2006)。英美兩國教育責任之比較分及其啟示。師大學報,5(1),1-21。
Levine, D. U. & Lezotte, L. W. (1990).Unusually effective school: A review and analysis of research and practice. Madison: National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
Mancebon, M. & Muniz, M. (2008). Private versus public high schools in Spain: disentangling managerial and programme efficiencies. Journal of the Operational Research Society ,59, 892 –901.
Mante,B. & O’Brien,G.(2002). Efficiency Measurement of Australian public sector organizations-The case of state secondary schools in Victoria. Journal of Educational Administration,40(3),274-296.
Mayston, D.J. & Jesson, D. J.(1991). Educational performance assessment: A new framework of analysis. Policy and Politics, 19(2),99-108.
McClure, C. (1986).A view from the trenches: costing and performance measures for academic library public services. College & Research Libraries ,47(4) 323-336.
Portela, S. & Thanassoulis, E (2001). Decomposing school and school-type efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 13(2),357–373.
Ralph, J. & Fennessey, J. (1983). Science or reform: some questions about the effective schools model. Phi Delta Kappan,(63), 689-694.
Rassouli-Currier, S. (2002).The determinants of school of school efficiency in Oklahoma:Result from stochastic production frontier and Data Envelopment Analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
Rassouli-Currier, S. (2007).Assessing the efficiency of Oklahoma public Schools: A data envelopment analysis. Southwestern Economic Review, 34, 131-144.
Ray, S.C. (1991).Resource-use efficiency in public schools: a study of Connecticut data. Management Science, 37(12),1620-8.
吳清基(1993)。教育行政決定理論與實際問題。臺北:文景。
Reynolds, D., & Cuttance, P .(1996). School effectiveness: research, policy and practice. New York : Cassell .
Ruggiero, J.(2007). Measuring the cost of meeting minimum educational standards:An application of data envelopment analysis. Education Economics,15(1),1-13
Ruggiero, J.(1996). Measuring technical inefficiency in the public sector: An analysis of educational production. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 499-509.
Ruggiero, J.(1996).On the measurement of technical efficiency in the public sector. European Journal of Operational Research,90(3),553-565
Santos ,J. & Themido, I. (2001). An application of recent developments of data envelopment analysis to the evaluation of secondary schools in Portugal. International Journal of Services Technology and anagement,2(1),142-160
Soteriou, A. C., Karahanna, E., Papanastasiou, C., & Diakourakis, M. S.(1998).Using DEA to evaluate the efficiency of secondary school:the case of Cyprus. International Journal of Educational Management,12(2), 65- 73.
Suradarma, D., Suryahadi, A., Sumarto, S.& Rogers, F. H.(2006).Improving student performance in public primary schools in developing countries: evidence from Indonesia, Education Economics, 14( 4), 401–429.
Tavares, G.(2002). A Bibligraphy of Data Envelopment Analysis (1978-2001) .Technical Report RRR 01-02,RUTCOR, Rutgers Univ Piscataway, N.J.
Taylor, B.E., Myerson, J.W. & Massy,W.F. (1993) . Strategic indicators in higher education: improving performance. New Jersey: Peterson`s Guides .
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993)., Schools make a difference: Lessons learned from a 10-year study of school effects. New York: Teachers College.
吳惠櫻(2004)。台北市立高級中等學校經營效率與生產力之研究。世新大學經濟學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
Thanassoulis, E. (1996). Altering the bias in differential school effectiveness using data envelopment analysis..Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47, 882-894.
Thanassoulis, E. , & Dunstan, P. (1994). Guiding schools to improved performance using data envelopment analysis: an illustration with data from a local educational authority. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45, 1247-1262.
Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation for relationships with limited dependent variables Econometrica. 26 (1),24–36.
Waldo, S.(2007).On the use of student data in efficiency analysis--Technical efficiency in Swedish upper secondary school. Economics of Educational Review,26(2),173-185
Waxman, H. C., Huang, S., & Anderson, L. (1997).Classroom process differences in Inner-city elementary schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(1),49-59.
Windham, D. M., & Chapman, D. W.(1990).The evaluation of educational efficiency:Constraints, issues, and policies. London:Jai Press.
Windham, D.M. ( 1988). Effectiveness indicators in the economic analysis of educational activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 12(6),575-665.
Zomorrodian, M. R(1990).Guidelines for improving efficiency in elementary schools in Western Massachusetts:A data envelopment analysis approach. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(17),2264A.
吳慧中(2004)。人口結構變遷下國民小學績效與規模之關係。國立成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
吳濟華、何柏正(2008)。組織效率與生產力評估—資料包絡法。台北:前程。
巫有鎰(2004)。學校與非學校因素對台東縣國小學生學業成就的影響:結合教育機會均等與學校效能研究的分析模式。屏東師範學院教育行政研究所博士論文,未出版,屏東市。
李宜芳(2000)。臺灣地區高等教育與人力規劃政策之研究。中國文化大學政治學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
李佩倫(2005)。影響國中學生基本學力測驗成績因素之探討。國立中興大學應用經濟學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。。
沈水河(2004)。以資料包絡分析法評估雲林縣公立國民中學之經營效率。南華大學管理科學系碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
周文章(2002),高雄市國民中學家長會組織運作與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
林天祐(1997)。學校經營與教育品質。教育資料與研究,19,28-32
林泊佑(1994)。國民小學公共關係與組織效能之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。未出版,台北市。
林佩怡(2010,3月18日)。好擠啊 北市4成國中2成國小淪沙丁魚學
校。中國時報。取自http://life.chinatimes.com
林炳文(2002)。臺灣地區商業銀行合併效率性之分析:資料包絡分析法的應用,臺灣管理學刊,1(2),341-355。
林逸青(2003)。國中院校長權力運作策略、衝突管理策略與學校效能之關係:微觀政治分析。國立台北師範學國民教育研究所博士論文。未出版,台北市。
林麗能(1995)。雲嘉南地區高級職業學校行政績效之評估。國立雲林技術學院企業管理技術研究所碩士論文,未出版,雲林縣。
教育部(2003)。國民中小學設備基準。
教育部(2010)。教育統計。台北:作者。
孫志麟 (1998)。國民教育指標體系的建立與應用。政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
秦夢群(1998)。教育行政。臺北:五南。
秦夢群、吳政達(2006)。國民教育階段學校行政績效指標體系建構之研究。教育資料與研究雙月刊。68,43-62。
孫遜(2004)。資料包絡分析法—理論與應用。台北:揚智。
財政部(2009)。重要財政指標。2009年11月10日。取自http://www.mof.gov.tw/public/Data
高強、黃旭男與Toshiyuki Sueyoshi(2003)。管理績效評估-資料包絡分析法。臺北:華泰。
張力允(1999)。我國公私立大學校院經營績效之比較研究。國立中正大學會計學研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
張明輝(2004)。平衡計分卡制度在學校績效管理之應用。教育研究月刊,123,19-25。
張鈿富(2008)。教育行政:理念與創新。臺北:高等教育。
張德銳(1994)。教育行政研究。臺北:五南。
張慶勳(1996)。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文。未出版,高雄市。
許添明、劉智豪。從國小校務評鑑論教育品質與管理之問題與對策,教育資料與研究,81,153-178。
郭昭佑(2000)。學校本位評鑑。臺北:五南。
郭振雄(2000)。多重生產程序之績效評估:我國大學院校效率衡量。國立臺灣大學會計學研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
郭添財(1996)。臺灣省國民小學規模經濟之研究─學校與班級最適規模之衡量。國立政治大學研究教育所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
陳明華(2004)。應用DEA評估國民中學經營效率之研究---以高雄市為例。
國立中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
陳雪珍(1997)。台灣地區公立高級中學管理績效之探討與評估。淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北縣。
陳榮方(1998)。以資料包絡法評量我國大學校院之教育品質。高雄科學技術學院學報,28,227-237。
陳順宇(1998)。多變量分析。台北:華泰。
陳淑玲(2004)。國民中學經營績效評估之研究-以臺灣地區某縣市國民中學為例。國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,花蓮縣。
陳慶雲(2004)。家長會組織運作對學校效能影響之研究--以桃園縣立竹圍國民中學為樣本。元智大學管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
傅遠智(2007)。評估我國大學校院之發展策略:以資料包絡法為例。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
湯志民(2001)。台北市國民中小學效務評鑑之評析,第八次教育行政論壇論文集。國立新竹師院主辦,109-132
黃台心(2005)。計量經濟學。台北:雙葉。
黃清信(2001)。台灣省國立高級中等學校效率之評估 ─ 資料包絡分析法應用。國立中正大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
黃培慈(2005)。以平衡計分卡應用於國民小學績效衡量指標設定之研究─以台中市某國小為例。逢甲大學經營管理碩士論文,未出版,台中市。。
黃振球(1992)。學校管理與績效。台北:師大書苑。
楊淑杏(2003)。台北市高級中等學校經營效率之評估-DEA之應用。國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
楊煥烘(1988)。國小校長領導型式與教師成熟度之配合對教師工作滿意及組織效能認知的影響。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
葉運偉(2009)。屏東縣國民小學教育經費效率與充足性的研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所博士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
詹碧珠(2008)。國民小學學校經營績效與相關問題之研究-以平衡計分卡觀點。國立花蓮教育大學學校行政碩士學位碩士論文,未出版,花蓮縣。
蓋浙生(1993)。教育經濟學。臺北:三民。
劉明超(2000)。台灣地區高級職業學校教育管理效率評估之研究-DEA模式之應用分析。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
劉春初(2004)。TIMSS-R 架構與DEA 分析法的運用-以台灣地區國民中學學校經營效率南北地區比較為例。台東大學教育學報,15(1),167-184
劉春榮(1993)。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
劉慶中(1996)。教育經費公平性與技術效率問題之研究:以屏東縣國民小學為例。行政院國家科學研究委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(計畫編號:NSC 81- 0301- H153- 501- J1)。
潘慧玲(1999)。學校效能相關概念的釐析。教育研究資訊,7(5),138-153。
潘惠靜(2001)。教育部獎補助經費對私立大學辦學績效之研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
蔡淑如(2003)。以資料包絡分析法(DEA)評估科技大學之辦學績效。朝陽科技大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中縣。
鄭文川(2004)。高雄市國民小學家長會組織運作與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
鄭淑芳(1997)。國立大學校院相對效率之研究-使用資料包絡分析法。國立台灣大學會計學碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
鄭燕祥(2001)。學校效能與校本管理,臺北:心理。
賴仁基(1997)。我國綜合大學效率差異之衡量─資料包絡分析的應用。國立政治大學財政學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
錢美蘭(2004)。預算制度對學校經營效率影響之研究-以臺北市立國民小學為例。東吳大學會計學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
薄喬萍(2008)。D.B.A.在績效評估之綜合運用。臺北:五南。
謝金青(1997)。國民小學學校效能評鑑指標與權重體系之建構。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
羅鴻玲(2007)。新竹縣公立國中辦學績效之研究。中國科技大學運籌管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
蘇秀花(2003)。臺北市國民小學校務評鑑實施成效及整合之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
蘇錦麗與顏慧明(2000)。臺灣省立高級中學相對效率評估之研究:資料包絡分析法之應用。臺灣銀行季刊,51(4),279-317。
蘇雄義與曹耀鈞(2001)。資料包絡分析與分析層級程序兩種模式於科技類股投資組合決策之研究。證券與期貨月刊,19(5),1-22。
顧志遠(1999)。高等教育單位之生產力評估與資源分配整合模式研究。管理與系統,6(3),347-364。
外文文獻
Agasisti, T. & Dal Bianco, A. (2006). Data envelopment analysis to the Italian university system: theoretical issues and policy implications ,International Journal of Business Performance Management, 8(4),344-367.
Ahn, T., Charnes, A. & Cooper ,W.(1988). Some statistical and DEA evaluations of relative efficiencies of public and private institutions of higher learning. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 22(6),259-269.
Anderson, L., Walberg, H. J. & Weinstein ,T.(1998).Efficiency and effectiveness analysis of Chicago public elementary schools: 1989, 1991, 1993.Education Administration Quarterly ,34(4), 484-504.
Angrist, J. D. & Lavy, V. (1999).Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class-size on scholastic achievement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 533–575.
Archer, J. (1998).Sanders 101. Education Week, 17(23), 24.
Asadullah, M. N. (2005).The effect of class size on student achievement: Evidence from Bangladesh. Applied. Economics Letters, 12(4), 217–221.
Avkiran, N. K. (2001) . Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian Universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(1), 57-80.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W.(1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science ,30(9),1078- 1092.
Berne, R. & Stiefel, L. (1999). Concepts of school finance equity: 1970 to the present. In equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives. Washington, D. C. : National Academy Press,
Bessent.A. M. , Bessent. E. W., Charnes. A. , Cooper. W. & Thorogood ,N. C. (1983). Evaluation of educational program proposals by Means of DEA. Educational Administration Quarterly,19(2),82-107.
Bessent, A. M., & Bessent, E. W.(1980). Determining the comparative efficiency of schools through data envelopment analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly ,16(2), 57- 75.
Bessent, A.M., Bessent, E.W., Kennington, J.& Reagan, B. (1982). An application of mathematical programming to assess productivity in the Houston independent school district. Management Science, 28(12)1355–1367.
Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R.G. & Thanassoulis, E. (1991). Applied data envelopment analysis., European Journal of Operational Research,52(1), 1-15.
Bradley, S., Johnes ,G. & Millington, J. (2001) .The effect of competition on the efficiency of secondary schools in England. European Journal of Operational Research ,135(3), 545-568.
Chakraborty, K.& Poggio , J.(2008). Efficiency and equity in school funding :A case study for Kansas. International Advance Economic Research,14,228-241.
描述 博士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
901525071
98
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0901525071
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 秦夢群<br>湯志民zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 方芳蘭zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Fang, Fang Lanen_US
dc.creator (作者) 方芳蘭zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Fang, Fang Lanen_US
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 8-Dec-2010 02:03:37 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 8-Dec-2010 02:03:37 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 8-Dec-2010 02:03:37 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0901525071en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49286-
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 901525071zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 近年來政府財政資源逐年緊縮,但社會大眾對教育品質之要求與日遽增,繼之以近年來少子化之情形日趨嚴重,國民小學開始衍生學生不足及規模過小問題,導致教育投資無效率的情形發生,因此著重衡量投入與產出關係的經營效率概念,成為未來學校經營的重點。本研究綜合實務及理論之觀察,在考量投入與產出評估之觀點下,經由投入及產出指標之計算,進行我國國民小學經營效率之評估,並探討影響我國國民小學經營效率之各項因素驗證其影響,提出增進學校經營效率之建議與策略。
      本研究評估我國國小經營效率,以台北市75所公立國小為研究樣本,採用97年度國小歲出計畫預算扣除人事費用之預算、教職員人數、校地面積為投入項,國小六年級國語科、數學科基本能力測驗精熟級以上通過人數、各校市級比賽得分、新生報到人數為產出項,並蒐集各校背景及教師素質、家長社經背景及學區因素等變項資料,藉由資料包絡分析法及Tobit迴歸分析,獲得台北市各公立國小之各項效率結果,及影響學校效率之各項因素分析。主要研究發現:(一)台北市國小技術效率表現尚佳。(二)學校普遍出現學生規模不足情形。(三)、學校成本效率表現普遍不佳。(四)效率表現較佳學校具有學生數多、設校時間較短、家長社經背景較佳特徵。(五)學校間學業成就表現差距較小,但各校師生多元表現表現差距較大。(六)在台北市國民小學經營效率調整方面,現有投入水準下產出有不足之情形,在現有產出水準下則有投入有過多之情形。影響學校經營效率之因素方面,學校特性中只有教師性別、學校成員、學校設立時間對學校經營效率有向顯著之影響;學生家長社會經濟背景方面,學校低收入戶及原住民學生比率越高對學校效率有顯著的負面影響,其餘因素影響並不顯著。學區環境部分,學校所處區位都市化程度越高效率越好,位於住宅區之學校效率優於其他各區。針對研究結果,提出下列建議。(一)規模過小學校,宜進行各項資源整合利用。(二)推動教師專業評鑑及落實考核。(三)建立教育績效責任制提升學校效率。(四)國小校務評鑑可同時有量化及質化之評鑑。(五)教育經費編列宜考量學校背景之差異性。(六)建議教育行政機關建立整合電腦資料庫以利未來研究。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Recent year the budget of government is tightening, but our expectation of the educational quality is never less than before. However, the birth rate of Taiwan decreases sharply during decades. It makes the problem that our elementary schools lacking scale of economies are more serious. By literatures reviewing, we find that most of them emphasize on effectiveness of elementary school but efficiency. If we ignore the viewpoint of efficiency, we will not catch the whole-picture of elementary schools’ performance. In this dissertation, we are not only examining the efficiency performance of elementary schools’ but also testing the impact of exogenous variables to efficiency.
      On first stage, We select half of elementary school of Taipei city as our empirical samples, and use data envelopment analysis (DEA)to examine their efficiency performance that include cost efficiency, scale efficiency, technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency ,and allocative efficiency. The result suggests that the sample school have a medium-high technical efficiency performance but poor cost efficiency. Technical efficiency performance is better than allocative and scale efficiency performance. We also confirm a problem that we expect our elementary schools lacking scale of economies. On the second stage, we use Tobit regression method to test our three hypotheses, The empirical result show (1)the evidence support our school characteristic hypothesis that school-specific factors (including the female faculty proportion, teaching experience of teachers, and involvement of teachers) have significant effect to efficiency performance of elementary school.(2) the evidence also support our socioeconomic hypothesis that students’ socioeconomic status (including the family situation and family financial condition) have significant effect to efficiency performance.(3) Our location hypothesis that the school district characteristic (including population density of district and location factor) have significant effect to efficiency performance is supported too.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章緒 論 頁次
     第一節 研究動機………………………………………………… 1
     第二節 研究目的與問題………………………………………… 6
     第三節 重要名詞釋義……………………………………………. 7
     第四節 研究流程………………………………………………… 8
     第二章文獻探討
     第一節 績效評估與學校經營…………………………………… 10
     第二節 學校效率的衡量………………………………………… 20
     第二節 學校效率與投入產出項………………………………… 34
     第四節 影響學校效率之因素……………………………………. 47
     第三章研究設計
     第一節 研究方法………………………………………………… 55
     第二節 理論架構與研究假說…………………………………… 69
     第三節 研究步驟與資料收集……………………………………. 82
     第四章實證研究成果
     第一節 基本資料分析……………………………………………. 89
     第二節 各項效率值表現分析……………………………………. 102
     第三節 影響學校效率因素分析…………………………………. 141
     第四節 各項假說驗證之彙總……………………………………. 154
     第五章結論與建議
     第一節 研究結論…………………………………………………. 154
     第二節 研究建議…………………………………………………. 161
     參考文獻………………………………………………………….
     167
     附錄
     附錄一 國小績優個案學校訪談實錄
     附錄二 師生參加對外比賽計分方式
     附錄三 研究調查問卷
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0901525071en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國民小學zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資料包絡分析法zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學校效率zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) elementary schoolen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) school efficiencyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) data envelopment analysisen_US
dc.title (題名) 國民小學經營效率及影響因素之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Efficiency performance and impact factors analyses of elementary schools in Taiwanen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 方德隆(1985)。國民中學組織結構與組織效能關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王棟良(2003)。台灣省21縣市國民中學學校效率之評估。國立中正大學數學研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王建正(2003)。國民小學學校經營效率評鑑指標之研究-DEA評鑑模式。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王國明與顧志遠(1991)。DEA模式在教育評鑑上應用之研究。現代教育,6(1),118-127。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 司徒達賢(2002)。非營利組織的經營管理。臺北:天下。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 行政院主計處(2009)。政府統計總覽。2009年10月25日,取自hhttp://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.aspzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳政達( 2004 )。資料包絡分析在高級中學教育監控指標系統之應用。教育研究集刊,50(2),119-145 。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳政達(2006)。少子化趨勢下國民中小學學校經濟規模政策之研究。教育政策論壇,9(1),23-41。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳政達( 2008 )。教育政策分析:概念、方法與應用。臺北:高等教育。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳若詩(2003)。台灣金融控股公司下之銀行經營效率。銘傳大學國際企業研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chakraborty, K., Biswas B., & Lewis, W. C.(2001).Measurement of technical efficiency in public education: A stochastic and nonstochastic production function . Approach. Journal of Southern Economic, 67(4),889-905.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E.(1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research ,2(6),429- 444.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chalos, P., Cherian, J.(1995).An application of data envelopment analysis to public sector performance measurement and accountability. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,14(2),143-160.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Charnes, A., & Cooper, W.W. & Rhodes, E. (1981) . Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Science,27(6),668-97.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Coelli, T. (1994). Assessing the performance of Australian universities using data envelopment analysis. Internal Report, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis,University of New England.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Conroy, J.S. ,&. Arguea, N. M.(2008).An estimation of technical efficiency for Florida public elementary schools. Economics of Education Review ,27, 655–663.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Daft, R. L.(1999). Organization theory and design. Ohio: South-Western College.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1),1-50.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duncombe, W., Ruggiero, J., & Yinger, J. (1996).Alternative approached to measuring the cost of education. In H. F. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education. Washington, DC.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fare, R., Geosskopf, S., & Weber, W.L. (1989). Measuring school districtzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳清山(1989)。國民小學管理模式與學校效能之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) performance. Public Finance Quarterly, 17(4), 409-428.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Farrell, M. J.(1957). The measurement of productivity efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A(General), 120(3), 253- 281.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Feng, Y. J. , & Lu, K. B. (2004).An AHP/DEA method for measurement of the efficiency of R&D management activities in universities. International Transactions in Operational Research, 11 ( 2),181-201zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fidler,B. ,& Bowles, G.(1991). Effective local management of schools. London:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fukuyama, H. & Weber, W.L. (2002).Evaluating public school district performance via DEA gain functions. Journal of the Operational Research Society , 53, 992–1003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Golany, B., and Roll ,Y.(1989). An application procedure for DEA, OMEGA, . 17(3),.237-250.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Golany,B. ,& Tamir,E.(1995).Evaluating efficiency-effectiveness-equality trade-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) offs: a data envelopment analysis approach,Management Science,41(1), 1172-1184.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grosskopf ,S. , Hayes, K. J. ,& Taylor L. L.(2009).The relative efficiency of Charter Schools. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80(1), 67-87.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳清山(2000)。學校績效責任的理念與策略。學校行政雙月刊,6,3-13。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Guthrie, J. W., Garms, W. I. & Pierce, L. C. (1988) . School finance and education policy: Enhancing. educational efficiency, equality, and choice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hanushek, E. (1995). Interpreting recent research on schooling in developing countries. World Bank Research Observer, 10(2), 227–246.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hoxby, C. (2000). The effects of class size on student achievement: new evidence from population variation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1239–1285.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Izadi, H., Johnes, G., Oskrochi, R.., & Crouchley, R. (2002). Stochastic frontier estimation of a CES cost function: the case of higher education in Britain. Economics of Education Review, 21(1), 63-71.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jesson, D., Mayston, D. , & Smith, P. (1987). Performance assessment in the education sector: educational and economic perspectives. Oxford Review of Educational, 13(3), 249-266.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jones, A. (2001). Recent findings in the economics of education reform and prospective work at the the Jim Self Center on the future, Clemon, SC: Clemson University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P.(1992).The balanced scorecard - Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review,70(1), 71-79.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Karen, A.(1995).Does class size matter? .Economics of Education Review. 14(3),229-241.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kirjavainen, T. & Loikkanenta, H. A.(1998). Efficiency differences of Finnish senior secondary schools:An Application of DEA and Tobit analysis. Economics of Education Review , 17(4),377-394.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krueger, A. B. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production functions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 497–532.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳清山、蔡菁芝(2006)。英美兩國教育責任之比較分及其啟示。師大學報,5(1),1-21。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Levine, D. U. & Lezotte, L. W. (1990).Unusually effective school: A review and analysis of research and practice. Madison: National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mancebon, M. & Muniz, M. (2008). Private versus public high schools in Spain: disentangling managerial and programme efficiencies. Journal of the Operational Research Society ,59, 892 –901.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mante,B. & O’Brien,G.(2002). Efficiency Measurement of Australian public sector organizations-The case of state secondary schools in Victoria. Journal of Educational Administration,40(3),274-296.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mayston, D.J. & Jesson, D. J.(1991). Educational performance assessment: A new framework of analysis. Policy and Politics, 19(2),99-108.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McClure, C. (1986).A view from the trenches: costing and performance measures for academic library public services. College & Research Libraries ,47(4) 323-336.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Portela, S. & Thanassoulis, E (2001). Decomposing school and school-type efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 13(2),357–373.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ralph, J. & Fennessey, J. (1983). Science or reform: some questions about the effective schools model. Phi Delta Kappan,(63), 689-694.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rassouli-Currier, S. (2002).The determinants of school of school efficiency in Oklahoma:Result from stochastic production frontier and Data Envelopment Analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rassouli-Currier, S. (2007).Assessing the efficiency of Oklahoma public Schools: A data envelopment analysis. Southwestern Economic Review, 34, 131-144.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ray, S.C. (1991).Resource-use efficiency in public schools: a study of Connecticut data. Management Science, 37(12),1620-8.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳清基(1993)。教育行政決定理論與實際問題。臺北:文景。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reynolds, D., & Cuttance, P .(1996). School effectiveness: research, policy and practice. New York : Cassell .zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ruggiero, J.(2007). Measuring the cost of meeting minimum educational standards:An application of data envelopment analysis. Education Economics,15(1),1-13zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ruggiero, J.(1996). Measuring technical inefficiency in the public sector: An analysis of educational production. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 499-509.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ruggiero, J.(1996).On the measurement of technical efficiency in the public sector. European Journal of Operational Research,90(3),553-565zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Santos ,J. & Themido, I. (2001). An application of recent developments of data envelopment analysis to the evaluation of secondary schools in Portugal. International Journal of Services Technology and anagement,2(1),142-160zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Soteriou, A. C., Karahanna, E., Papanastasiou, C., & Diakourakis, M. S.(1998).Using DEA to evaluate the efficiency of secondary school:the case of Cyprus. International Journal of Educational Management,12(2), 65- 73.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Suradarma, D., Suryahadi, A., Sumarto, S.& Rogers, F. H.(2006).Improving student performance in public primary schools in developing countries: evidence from Indonesia, Education Economics, 14( 4), 401–429.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tavares, G.(2002). A Bibligraphy of Data Envelopment Analysis (1978-2001) .Technical Report RRR 01-02,RUTCOR, Rutgers Univ Piscataway, N.J.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Taylor, B.E., Myerson, J.W. & Massy,W.F. (1993) . Strategic indicators in higher education: improving performance. New Jersey: Peterson`s Guides .zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993)., Schools make a difference: Lessons learned from a 10-year study of school effects. New York: Teachers College.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳惠櫻(2004)。台北市立高級中等學校經營效率與生產力之研究。世新大學經濟學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thanassoulis, E. (1996). Altering the bias in differential school effectiveness using data envelopment analysis..Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47, 882-894.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thanassoulis, E. , & Dunstan, P. (1994). Guiding schools to improved performance using data envelopment analysis: an illustration with data from a local educational authority. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45, 1247-1262.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation for relationships with limited dependent variables Econometrica. 26 (1),24–36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Waldo, S.(2007).On the use of student data in efficiency analysis--Technical efficiency in Swedish upper secondary school. Economics of Educational Review,26(2),173-185zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Waxman, H. C., Huang, S., & Anderson, L. (1997).Classroom process differences in Inner-city elementary schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(1),49-59.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Windham, D. M., & Chapman, D. W.(1990).The evaluation of educational efficiency:Constraints, issues, and policies. London:Jai Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Windham, D.M. ( 1988). Effectiveness indicators in the economic analysis of educational activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 12(6),575-665.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zomorrodian, M. R(1990).Guidelines for improving efficiency in elementary schools in Western Massachusetts:A data envelopment analysis approach. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(17),2264A.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳慧中(2004)。人口結構變遷下國民小學績效與規模之關係。國立成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文,未出版,台南市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳濟華、何柏正(2008)。組織效率與生產力評估—資料包絡法。台北:前程。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 巫有鎰(2004)。學校與非學校因素對台東縣國小學生學業成就的影響:結合教育機會均等與學校效能研究的分析模式。屏東師範學院教育行政研究所博士論文,未出版,屏東市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李宜芳(2000)。臺灣地區高等教育與人力規劃政策之研究。中國文化大學政治學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李佩倫(2005)。影響國中學生基本學力測驗成績因素之探討。國立中興大學應用經濟學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 沈水河(2004)。以資料包絡分析法評估雲林縣公立國民中學之經營效率。南華大學管理科學系碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周文章(2002),高雄市國民中學家長會組織運作與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林天祐(1997)。學校經營與教育品質。教育資料與研究,19,28-32zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林泊佑(1994)。國民小學公共關係與組織效能之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林佩怡(2010,3月18日)。好擠啊 北市4成國中2成國小淪沙丁魚學zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 校。中國時報。取自http://life.chinatimes.comzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林炳文(2002)。臺灣地區商業銀行合併效率性之分析:資料包絡分析法的應用,臺灣管理學刊,1(2),341-355。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林逸青(2003)。國中院校長權力運作策略、衝突管理策略與學校效能之關係:微觀政治分析。國立台北師範學國民教育研究所博士論文。未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林麗能(1995)。雲嘉南地區高級職業學校行政績效之評估。國立雲林技術學院企業管理技術研究所碩士論文,未出版,雲林縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 教育部(2003)。國民中小學設備基準。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 教育部(2010)。教育統計。台北:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 孫志麟 (1998)。國民教育指標體系的建立與應用。政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 秦夢群(1998)。教育行政。臺北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 秦夢群、吳政達(2006)。國民教育階段學校行政績效指標體系建構之研究。教育資料與研究雙月刊。68,43-62。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 孫遜(2004)。資料包絡分析法—理論與應用。台北:揚智。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 財政部(2009)。重要財政指標。2009年11月10日。取自http://www.mof.gov.tw/public/Datazh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高強、黃旭男與Toshiyuki Sueyoshi(2003)。管理績效評估-資料包絡分析法。臺北:華泰。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張力允(1999)。我國公私立大學校院經營績效之比較研究。國立中正大學會計學研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張明輝(2004)。平衡計分卡制度在學校績效管理之應用。教育研究月刊,123,19-25。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張鈿富(2008)。教育行政:理念與創新。臺北:高等教育。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張德銳(1994)。教育行政研究。臺北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張慶勳(1996)。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文。未出版,高雄市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許添明、劉智豪。從國小校務評鑑論教育品質與管理之問題與對策,教育資料與研究,81,153-178。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭昭佑(2000)。學校本位評鑑。臺北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭振雄(2000)。多重生產程序之績效評估:我國大學院校效率衡量。國立臺灣大學會計學研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭添財(1996)。臺灣省國民小學規模經濟之研究─學校與班級最適規模之衡量。國立政治大學研究教育所博士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳明華(2004)。應用DEA評估國民中學經營效率之研究---以高雄市為例。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 國立中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳雪珍(1997)。台灣地區公立高級中學管理績效之探討與評估。淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳榮方(1998)。以資料包絡法評量我國大學校院之教育品質。高雄科學技術學院學報,28,227-237。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳順宇(1998)。多變量分析。台北:華泰。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳淑玲(2004)。國民中學經營績效評估之研究-以臺灣地區某縣市國民中學為例。國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版,花蓮縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳慶雲(2004)。家長會組織運作對學校效能影響之研究--以桃園縣立竹圍國民中學為樣本。元智大學管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 傅遠智(2007)。評估我國大學校院之發展策略:以資料包絡法為例。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 湯志民(2001)。台北市國民中小學效務評鑑之評析,第八次教育行政論壇論文集。國立新竹師院主辦,109-132zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃台心(2005)。計量經濟學。台北:雙葉。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃清信(2001)。台灣省國立高級中等學校效率之評估 ─ 資料包絡分析法應用。國立中正大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃培慈(2005)。以平衡計分卡應用於國民小學績效衡量指標設定之研究─以台中市某國小為例。逢甲大學經營管理碩士論文,未出版,台中市。。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃振球(1992)。學校管理與績效。台北:師大書苑。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊淑杏(2003)。台北市高級中等學校經營效率之評估-DEA之應用。國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊煥烘(1988)。國小校長領導型式與教師成熟度之配合對教師工作滿意及組織效能認知的影響。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉運偉(2009)。屏東縣國民小學教育經費效率與充足性的研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所博士論文,未出版,屏東縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 詹碧珠(2008)。國民小學學校經營績效與相關問題之研究-以平衡計分卡觀點。國立花蓮教育大學學校行政碩士學位碩士論文,未出版,花蓮縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蓋浙生(1993)。教育經濟學。臺北:三民。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉明超(2000)。台灣地區高級職業學校教育管理效率評估之研究-DEA模式之應用分析。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉春初(2004)。TIMSS-R 架構與DEA 分析法的運用-以台灣地區國民中學學校經營效率南北地區比較為例。台東大學教育學報,15(1),167-184zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉春榮(1993)。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉慶中(1996)。教育經費公平性與技術效率問題之研究:以屏東縣國民小學為例。行政院國家科學研究委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(計畫編號:NSC 81- 0301- H153- 501- J1)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 潘慧玲(1999)。學校效能相關概念的釐析。教育研究資訊,7(5),138-153。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 潘惠靜(2001)。教育部獎補助經費對私立大學辦學績效之研究。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡淑如(2003)。以資料包絡分析法(DEA)評估科技大學之辦學績效。朝陽科技大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭文川(2004)。高雄市國民小學家長會組織運作與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭淑芳(1997)。國立大學校院相對效率之研究-使用資料包絡分析法。國立台灣大學會計學碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭燕祥(2001)。學校效能與校本管理,臺北:心理。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 賴仁基(1997)。我國綜合大學效率差異之衡量─資料包絡分析的應用。國立政治大學財政學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 錢美蘭(2004)。預算制度對學校經營效率影響之研究-以臺北市立國民小學為例。東吳大學會計學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 薄喬萍(2008)。D.B.A.在績效評估之綜合運用。臺北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝金青(1997)。國民小學學校效能評鑑指標與權重體系之建構。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 羅鴻玲(2007)。新竹縣公立國中辦學績效之研究。中國科技大學運籌管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇秀花(2003)。臺北市國民小學校務評鑑實施成效及整合之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇錦麗與顏慧明(2000)。臺灣省立高級中學相對效率評估之研究:資料包絡分析法之應用。臺灣銀行季刊,51(4),279-317。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇雄義與曹耀鈞(2001)。資料包絡分析與分析層級程序兩種模式於科技類股投資組合決策之研究。證券與期貨月刊,19(5),1-22。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顧志遠(1999)。高等教育單位之生產力評估與資源分配整合模式研究。管理與系統,6(3),347-364。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 外文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Agasisti, T. & Dal Bianco, A. (2006). Data envelopment analysis to the Italian university system: theoretical issues and policy implications ,International Journal of Business Performance Management, 8(4),344-367.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ahn, T., Charnes, A. & Cooper ,W.(1988). Some statistical and DEA evaluations of relative efficiencies of public and private institutions of higher learning. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 22(6),259-269.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anderson, L., Walberg, H. J. & Weinstein ,T.(1998).Efficiency and effectiveness analysis of Chicago public elementary schools: 1989, 1991, 1993.Education Administration Quarterly ,34(4), 484-504.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Angrist, J. D. & Lavy, V. (1999).Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class-size on scholastic achievement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 533–575.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Archer, J. (1998).Sanders 101. Education Week, 17(23), 24.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Asadullah, M. N. (2005).The effect of class size on student achievement: Evidence from Bangladesh. Applied. Economics Letters, 12(4), 217–221.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Avkiran, N. K. (2001) . Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian Universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(1), 57-80.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W.(1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science ,30(9),1078- 1092.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Berne, R. & Stiefel, L. (1999). Concepts of school finance equity: 1970 to the present. In equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives. Washington, D. C. : National Academy Press,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bessent.A. M. , Bessent. E. W., Charnes. A. , Cooper. W. & Thorogood ,N. C. (1983). Evaluation of educational program proposals by Means of DEA. Educational Administration Quarterly,19(2),82-107.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bessent, A. M., & Bessent, E. W.(1980). Determining the comparative efficiency of schools through data envelopment analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly ,16(2), 57- 75.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bessent, A.M., Bessent, E.W., Kennington, J.& Reagan, B. (1982). An application of mathematical programming to assess productivity in the Houston independent school district. Management Science, 28(12)1355–1367.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R.G. & Thanassoulis, E. (1991). Applied data envelopment analysis., European Journal of Operational Research,52(1), 1-15.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bradley, S., Johnes ,G. & Millington, J. (2001) .The effect of competition on the efficiency of secondary schools in England. European Journal of Operational Research ,135(3), 545-568.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chakraborty, K.& Poggio , J.(2008). Efficiency and equity in school funding :A case study for Kansas. International Advance Economic Research,14,228-241.zh_TW