dc.contributor.advisor | 耿曙 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 梁廣榮 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | 梁廣榮 | zh_TW |
dc.date (日期) | 2009 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 8-Dec-2010 11:29:36 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 8-Dec-2010 11:29:36 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 8-Dec-2010 11:29:36 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0095260016 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49435 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 東亞研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 95260016 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 98 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 台灣、香港均和中國大陸有同文同種、密不可分的關係。1978年中國大陸改革開放後,台港商陸續前往投資,近年來在全球化的浪潮下,人數持續增加。本研究的問題意識在於:中國大陸的台港商與大陸當地接觸時間長,互動頻繁,其是否有可能降低對大陸的偏見?是否可能導致台、港商身分認同的轉變?本研究在2008年針對東莞地區的台、港商進行田野調查的結果,發現「投資地的社會文化」對台港商造成不同的影響。若投資者與投資地擁有相同的語言和文化,會使得「交截分類狀態」產生作用,進而產生「歸屬感」,導致投資者逐漸認同當地的現象。因此,由於港商與廣東東莞地區的語言文化相近,使得港商對大陸的偏見逐漸降低,身分認同也開始轉變;而台商則與大陸人之間存在明顯隔閡,致使台商無法融入當地人的社交網絡,仍舊維持著「台灣人」的身分認同。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Taiwan and Hong Kong have close kinship with China. After Chinese reform and opening in 1978, Taiwanese and Hongkongese investors have invested in China and their numbers increased due to the globalization. The main concerns of this dissertation are as following: Would it be possible for Taiwanese and Hongkongese investors in China to reduce their prejudice toward Chinese and to change their identities because of their interaction with society in China? Through the field study in Dongguan in 2008. After interviewing Taiwanese investors and Hongkongese investors in Dongguan. This thesis indicates that “the culture of invested place” would cause different effects to Taiwanese and Hongkongese investors. The same language and culture create the “cross-categorization” and the sense of belongingness toward local community. Therefore, due to the close language and culture with Hong Kong and Dongguan, the Hongkongese investors reduce their prejudice to China. The phenomenon causes the identities of Hongkongese investors begin to change. Thus, it is difficult for them to integrate into local community. For that reason, they maintain their “Taiwanese identity” still. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 導論………………………………………………………….8 第一節 研究背景及目的……………………………………..…9 第二節 台港商特質異同比較………………………………….14 第三節 研究設計與研究方法………………………………….18第二章 文獻檢閱……………………………………………………23 第一節 「文化」的意涵……………………………………....23 第二節 社會認同理論與交截分類狀態……………………....24第三章 港商在珠三角:文化相近,界線日益模糊………………29 第一節 經濟網絡……….……………………………………….29 第二節 社會網絡……………………………………………….33 第三節 生涯規劃與身分認同………………………………….37 第四節 小結…………………………………………………….41第四章 台商在珠三角:文化疏離,一堵高牆,兩個世界………43 第一節 經濟網絡………………………………………………43 第二節 社會網絡………………………………………………48 第三節 生涯規劃與身分認同…………………………………52 第四節 小結……………………………………………………56第五章 結論 ………………………………………………………...57 | zh_TW |
dc.format.extent | 137076 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 280120 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 197103 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 166970 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 536595 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 383641 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 434562 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 460437 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 386111 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 250676 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 274454 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095260016 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 台商 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 港商 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 社會認同 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 交截分類狀態 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 身分認同 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 當地化 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | 獨在異鄉為異客:中國大陸台、港商身份認同的比較研究 | zh_TW |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中文部分 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 方孝謙,2003,〈全球化衝擊下大陸台商的認同問題〉,載於許光泰、方孝謙、陳永生編,《世貿組織與兩岸發展》,台北:政大國關中心,489-504。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王軍,2007,〈近年來香港在內地投資的主要特點〉,《中國外資》,第166期,頁12-13。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 石之瑜編,2003。《家國之間:開展兩岸關係的能動機緣》,台北:新臺灣人文基金會/翰蘆。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳乃德,2005,〈麵包與愛情:初探台灣民眾認同的變動〉,《台灣政治學刊》,第9卷第2期,頁5-39。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳玉山,1997,《抗衡與扈從:兩岸關係新詮釋》,台北:正中。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳新興,1995。《整合理論與兩岸關係之研究》,台北:五南。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳宏一、沈清松、趙金祁著,1999,《人文社會科技的展望》,台北:台灣書店。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李美枝,2003,〈族群與國族認同的意識〉,《本土心理學研究》,第20期,頁39-71。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 汪宏倫,《制度脈絡、外部因素與台灣之『national question』的特殊性:一個理論與經驗的反省》,頁203-208。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 阮雙儀,2006,〈麵包換愛情?中港經貿往來對港人認同之影響〉,南華大學國際暨大陸事務亞太研究所碩士學位論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 冼玉儀,1997,〈社會組織與社會轉變〉,載於王賡武主編,《香港史新編》,香港:三聯書店,頁158-196。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 香港經濟研究中心,2003,《珠三角製造—香港製造業的蛻變》,香港:香港工業總會。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 香港經濟研究中心,2007,《珠三角製造—香港工業的挑戰與機遇》,香港:香港工業總會。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 耿曙,2002,4月,〈『資訊人』亦或『台灣人』?:大上海地區高科技台商的國家認同〉,論文發表於佛光人文社會學院政治研究所主辦之「第二屆政治與資訊」研討會,宜蘭。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 耿曙,2003,〈連綴社群:WTO背景下兩岸民間互動的分析概念〉,載於許光泰、方孝謙、陳永生編,《世貿組織與兩岸發展》,台北:政大國關中心,頁57~87。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 耿曙、林家煌、2008年4月,〈登堂未入室:信任結構、協力網絡與臺商產業群聚的模式〉,《社會科學論叢》,第二卷第一期,頁91-126。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 馬岳琳,2007,〈上班族的中國愁〉,《天下雜誌》,2007年4月25日,頁113。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張亞中,2000。《兩岸統合論》,台北:生智。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張家銘、江聖哲,2007,〈蘇州台商的政企關係—制度鑲嵌與比較觀點的考察〉,《政治學報》,第44期,頁25-65。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張傳國,2006,〈台商與港商對祖國大陸投資的戰略比較〉,《台灣研究》,第83期,頁23-28。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 莊錫昌、顧雲深、顧曉鳴等編,1991,《多維視野中的文化理論》,台北,淑馨。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 莊耀嘉,2003,〈族群與偏見在兩岸關係中的角色〉,《本土心理學研究》,第20期,頁73-104。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳朝政,2005,〈大陸台商的認同變遷:理論的歸納與推論〉,《東亞研究》,第36卷第1期,頁227-274。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳鏗任、吳建華,2006,〈是故鄉,還是異鄉?從東莞台校學生的學習經驗看台商子女的身份認同意象〉,《師大學報:教育類》,第51期,頁173-193。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 楊春、廖海峰,2006年,7月,〈東莞市港資與台資產業集聚對比研究〉,論文發表於北京大學地理科學研究中心主辦之「第五屆產業集聚與區域發展國際學術會議」,北京。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉仁傑、封小雲,1996,《亞洲巨龍:台、日、港投資大陸風雲錄》,台北:遠流。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 魏鏞,2002,〈邁向民族內共同體:台海兩岸互動模式之建構、發展與檢驗〉,《中國大陸研究》,第45卷第5期,頁1-55。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Smith, Anthony D,龔維斌、良警宇譯,2002,《全球化時代的民族與民族主義》,北京:中央編譯出版社。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Woodward, Kathryn、林文琪譯,2004。《身體認同:同一與差異》,台北:韋伯文化。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈台灣民調顯示多數贊成三通〉,BBC中文網: http://news.bbc.co.uk/chinese/trad/hi/newsid_2360000/newsid_2361500/2361599.stm。 檢索日期:2007年11月12日。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈台灣對中國大陸貿易占我貿易之比重〉,《兩岸經濟統計月報》,第188期,http://www.mac.gov.tw/big5/statistic/em/188/13.pdf 。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈我國對外投資統計〉,《兩岸經濟統計月報》,第188期,http://www.mac.gov.tw/big5/statistic/em/188/13.pdf 。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 〈兩岸貿易金額之估算〉,兩岸經濟統計月報,第188期,http://www.mac.gov.tw/big5/statistic/em/188/6.pdf 。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 東莞台商協會網站,網址:http://www.dgtba.org/asp/index.asp。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王寧,〈全球後殖民語境下的身份問題〉,http://tvguide.cctv.com/tvguide/tvcomment/tyzj/zjwz/3734.shtml。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 金伯生、聶平香,2006,〈台商在大陸的投資現況與發展趨勢〉,商務部網站:http://big.nbfet.gov.cn/llyj/detail.phtml?newId=57357&big5=0。檢索日期:2008年1月31日。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 香港社會服務聯會,網址:http://www.hkcss.org.hk/pra/SocialVision2012/crossborder.htm。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 賀靜萍,2007,〈大陸黑心玩具 全球大落跑〉,工商時報, http://news.money.chinatimes.com/CMoney/News/News-Page/0,4442,content+120603+122007082000385,00.html?source=rss#。檢索日期:2007年11月12日。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 賀靜萍,2007,〈反應落後港商,台商學教訓〉,工商時報, http://times.hinet.net/news/20071012/mainland/682b51300acf.htm。檢索日期:2007年11月12日。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 經濟部投審會網站,網址:http://www.moeaic.gov.tw。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 外文部分 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Anderson, Benedict, 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brewer, Marilynn B. & Samuel L. Gaertner, 2001. “Toward Reduction of Prejudice: Intergroup Contact and Social Categorization,” in Rupert Brown & Samuel L. Gaertner eds., Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 451-472. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brewer, M. B., Ho, H., Lee, J., & Miller, N., 1987. “Social identity and social distance among Hong Kong schoolchildren.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, No. 13, pp.156-165. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brown, Rupert, 1995. Prejudice: Its Social Psychology, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Deschamps, J. C., & Doise, W., 1978. “Crossed category memberships in intergroup relations.” In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differential between social groups. London: Academic. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Duckitt, John H., 1992. The Social Psychology of Prejudice, New York: Praeger. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gaertner, Samuel L. et al. 1996. “The Contact Hypothesis: The Role of a Common Ingroup Identity on Reducing Intergroup Bias among Majority and Minority Group Members,” in Judith L. Nye & Aaron M. Brower eds., What’s Social about Social Cognition? Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 230-260. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Geertz, Clifford, 1973, “Integrative Revolution: Primordial Sentiments and Civil Politics in the New States.” in Clifford Geertz. eds., The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, pp. 255-311. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gellner, Ernest., 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca,NY: Cornell University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Henri Tajfel & John C. Turner, 2003. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior,” in Michael A. Hogg ed., Social Psychology: Vol. IV: Intergroup Behavior and Societal Context, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 73-98. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hogg, Michael A. & Dominic Abrams, 1988. Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes, London & New York: Routledge. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hogg, Michael A. 2006. “Social Identity Theory,” in Peter J. Burke ed., Contemporary Social Psychological Theories, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 111-136. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hutchinson, John & Anthony D. Smith eds., 1994, Nationalism, Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hutchinson, John & Anthony D. Smith eds., 1996, Ethnicity, Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Keng, Shu Lu-huei Chen & Kuan-bo Huang, 2006. “Sense, Sensitivity, and Sophistication in Shaping the Future of Cross-Strait Relations,” Issues & Studies, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp23-66. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Smart, Alan, 2000. “The Emergence of Local Capitalisms in China: Overseas Chinese Investment and Patterns of Development.” in S. M. Li & W. S. Tang, eds., China’s Regions, Policy and Economy: A Study of Spatial Transformation in the Post-Reform Era, Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Smith, Anthony D.,1993. “The Nation: Invented, Imagined, Reconstructed?” in Marjorie Ringrose & Adam J. Lerner eds., Reimagining the Nation. Bristol: Open University Press, pp. 9-28. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Smith, Anthony, D., 1991. National Identity. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tajfel, Henri, 1981, Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology, Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Turner, John C. & Howard Giles, 1981. Intergroup Behaviour, Oxford: Blackwell. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Turner, John C. & Katherine J. Reynolds, 2001. “The Social Identity Perspective in Intergroup Relations: Theories, Themes, and Controversies,” in Rupert Brown & Samuel L. Gaertner eds., Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 133-152. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Vanbeselaere, N.,1991. “The different effects of simple and crossed categorization: A result of the category differentiation process or of differential category salience?” In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone eds., European review of social psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 247-278. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yang, Chun, 2007. “Divergent Hybrid Capitalisms in China: Hong Kong and Taiwanese Electronics Clusters in Dongguan.” Economic Geography, Vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 395-420. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | “Mexico City Declaration on Cultural Policies, World Conference on Cultural Policies Mexico City, 26 July~ 6 August 1982” ,《UNESCO》,http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/files/12762/11295421661mexico_en.pdf/mexico_en.pdf. | zh_TW |