學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 國際股市間的外溢效果
Mean and Volatility Spillover Effects in the G7 and BRICs Stock Markets
作者 周宛瑩
Chou,Wan Yin
貢獻者 謝淑貞
Shieh,Shu zhen
周宛瑩
Chou,Wan Yin
關鍵詞 外溢效果
日期 2009
上傳時間 8-Dec-2010 13:43:12 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究應用Chelley-Steeley and Steeley(1996) 的ARMA(1,1)-GARCH(1,1)in mean(以下簡稱ARMA(1,1)-GARCH(1,1)-M) 模型來檢驗美國與加拿大、義大利、英國、法國、德國、日本股市與巴西、俄羅斯、印度及中國(四者合稱金磚四國)之間,是否存在報酬外溢效果以及波動性外溢效果,並且探討國際股市間之關連性。實證結果發現:第一、國際股市間確實存在市場互相感染的現象,不論金融海嘯的前後,各國股價指數報酬率皆存在著從美國引起的報酬外溢效果,而且G7及金磚四國股市不僅皆具有自我波動性外溢效果,在金融海嘯前也受到美國前一期衝擊的波動性外溢效果。第二、在重大的金融危機事件後,大多數國家的股市報酬單獨被國內金融市場所解釋的程度大為減少,而且對衝擊的影響具有更強烈的持續性。第三、無論環球金融危機的前後,除了巴西之外,其他六大工業國家較容易受美國股市的連動性影響,而代表新興國家市場的其餘金磚三國則較不受其影響。
This paper investigates the mean return and volatility spillover effects from the U.S. to Canada, Italy, England, France, Germany, Japan and the BRICs by using ARMA(1,1)-GARCH(1,1)-M model of Chelley-Steeley and Steeley(1996), furthermore, we explore the conditional correlations between them. The empirical results from examining the data for the period of 1992 to 2010 suggests that international market contagion exactly plays an important role in the transmission mechanism, and the U.S. market is influential in transmitting returns and volatilities to the G7 and the BRICs countries.
Moreover, we found that the spillover effect of Brazil after financial crisis is the greatest, and the G7 countries are more inclined to be affected by the U.S. than Russia, India, and China.
參考文獻 英文部分:
Angeles Fernandez-Izquierdo, Juan Angel Lafuente(2004), “International transmission of stock exchange volatility: Empirical evidence from the Asian crisis,” Global Finance Journal, Vol.15, 125-137.
Apanard Penny Angkinand, James R. Barth, Hyeongwoo Kim(2009), “Spillover effects from the U.S. financial crisis: Some time-series evidence from national stock returns,” Working Paper
Christiansen, C.,(2003), “Volatiliy-Spillover Effects in European Bond Markets,” Working Paper, Aarhus School of Business.
In, F., S. Kim, J. H. Yoon and C. Viney (2001), “Dynamic interdependence and
volatility transmission of Asian stock markets: evidence from the Asian crisis,” International Review of Financial Analysis, 10, 87-96.
John M. Griffin, Rene M. Stulz(2001), “International Competition and Exchange Rate Shocks: A Cross-Country Industry,” The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 215-241.
M. Billio, L. Pelizzon(2002), “Volatility and Shocks Spillover before and after EMU in European Stock Markets,” Working Paper, n. 07. 02
Mervyn A. King, Sushil Wadhwani(1990),“Transmission of Volatility between Stock Markets,” The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1
Nathaniel Frank and Heiko Hesse(2009), “Financial Spillovers to Emerging Markets During the Global Financial Crisis,” IMF Working Paper.
Y. Angela Liu, Ming-Shiun Pan(1997),“Mean and Volatility Spillover Effects in the U.S. and Pacific-Basin Stock Markets,” Multinational Finance Journal, Vol.1, No. 1, pp. 47-62.
中文部分:
姜淑美、陳明麗、蔡佩珊(2005),國際股價指數現貨與期貨報酬外溢性及不對稱性效果之研究,經營管理論叢,vol. 1,No.2,23-39.
郭彥菁(2009),「美國次級房貸風暴對台灣股匯市相關性之影響」,真理大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,1-79.
黎明淵、林修葳、郭憲章與楊聲勇(2003),美、日股市巨幅波動下的股市連動效果–美國、日本與亞洲四小龍股市實證結果,證券市場發展,第十五期,117-145.
黎明淵(2002),高、低股市波動狀態下之雙重貝他係數檢測–美國、日本與亞洲四小龍股市實證研究,台灣管理學刊,第二卷第二期,99-118.
邱建良、李彥賢、鄒易恁(2005),金融風暴對股市間波動性的連動性影響–ARJI模型,真理財金學報,第13期,1-22.
徐清俊、林柏宇(2003),金融控股公司股價波動性之實證研究,遠東學報,第二十卷第四期,1-18.
徐清俊、吳明恆(2003),美國、日本與台灣股票市場動態關係,遠東學報,第二十卷第二期,265-282.
王凱立、陳美玲(2003),亞洲金融風暴發生前後美國與台灣股市動態關聯之進一步研究,經濟論文叢刊 ,31:2,191-252.
賴彥君(2007),美國次級房貸風暴對全球股價走勢的衝擊與影響-以DCC模型分析,國立政治大學經濟研究所學位論文
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易研究所
97351022
98
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097351022
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 謝淑貞zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Shieh,Shu zhenen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 周宛瑩zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chou,Wan Yinen_US
dc.creator (作者) 周宛瑩zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chou,Wan Yinen_US
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 8-Dec-2010 13:43:12 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 8-Dec-2010 13:43:12 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 8-Dec-2010 13:43:12 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0097351022en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49554-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國際經營與貿易研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97351022zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究應用Chelley-Steeley and Steeley(1996) 的ARMA(1,1)-GARCH(1,1)in mean(以下簡稱ARMA(1,1)-GARCH(1,1)-M) 模型來檢驗美國與加拿大、義大利、英國、法國、德國、日本股市與巴西、俄羅斯、印度及中國(四者合稱金磚四國)之間,是否存在報酬外溢效果以及波動性外溢效果,並且探討國際股市間之關連性。實證結果發現:第一、國際股市間確實存在市場互相感染的現象,不論金融海嘯的前後,各國股價指數報酬率皆存在著從美國引起的報酬外溢效果,而且G7及金磚四國股市不僅皆具有自我波動性外溢效果,在金融海嘯前也受到美國前一期衝擊的波動性外溢效果。第二、在重大的金融危機事件後,大多數國家的股市報酬單獨被國內金融市場所解釋的程度大為減少,而且對衝擊的影響具有更強烈的持續性。第三、無論環球金融危機的前後,除了巴西之外,其他六大工業國家較容易受美國股市的連動性影響,而代表新興國家市場的其餘金磚三國則較不受其影響。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This paper investigates the mean return and volatility spillover effects from the U.S. to Canada, Italy, England, France, Germany, Japan and the BRICs by using ARMA(1,1)-GARCH(1,1)-M model of Chelley-Steeley and Steeley(1996), furthermore, we explore the conditional correlations between them. The empirical results from examining the data for the period of 1992 to 2010 suggests that international market contagion exactly plays an important role in the transmission mechanism, and the U.S. market is influential in transmitting returns and volatilities to the G7 and the BRICs countries.
Moreover, we found that the spillover effect of Brazil after financial crisis is the greatest, and the G7 countries are more inclined to be affected by the U.S. than Russia, India, and China.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 摘要............................................................................................................ii
目錄...........................................................................................................iii
表目錄.......................................................................................................iv
圖目錄........................................................................................................v
第一章 緒論.........................................................................................1
第二章 文獻探討.................................................................................4
第三章 研究方法.................................................................................7
第四章 實證結果與分析...................................................................10
第一節 資料來源與處理............................................................10
第二節 資料的敘述統計............................................................11
第三節 Garch模型的配適效果..................................................14
第四節 國際股市間的外溢效果................................................20
第五章 結論.......................................................................................32
第六章 參考文獻...............................................................................33
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 2988034 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097351022en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 外溢效果zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 國際股市間的外溢效果zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Mean and Volatility Spillover Effects in the G7 and BRICs Stock Marketsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Angeles Fernandez-Izquierdo, Juan Angel Lafuente(2004), “International transmission of stock exchange volatility: Empirical evidence from the Asian crisis,” Global Finance Journal, Vol.15, 125-137.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Apanard Penny Angkinand, James R. Barth, Hyeongwoo Kim(2009), “Spillover effects from the U.S. financial crisis: Some time-series evidence from national stock returns,” Working Paperzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Christiansen, C.,(2003), “Volatiliy-Spillover Effects in European Bond Markets,” Working Paper, Aarhus School of Business.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) In, F., S. Kim, J. H. Yoon and C. Viney (2001), “Dynamic interdependence andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) volatility transmission of Asian stock markets: evidence from the Asian crisis,” International Review of Financial Analysis, 10, 87-96.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) John M. Griffin, Rene M. Stulz(2001), “International Competition and Exchange Rate Shocks: A Cross-Country Industry,” The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 215-241.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) M. Billio, L. Pelizzon(2002), “Volatility and Shocks Spillover before and after EMU in European Stock Markets,” Working Paper, n. 07. 02zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mervyn A. King, Sushil Wadhwani(1990),“Transmission of Volatility between Stock Markets,” The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nathaniel Frank and Heiko Hesse(2009), “Financial Spillovers to Emerging Markets During the Global Financial Crisis,” IMF Working Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Y. Angela Liu, Ming-Shiun Pan(1997),“Mean and Volatility Spillover Effects in the U.S. and Pacific-Basin Stock Markets,” Multinational Finance Journal, Vol.1, No. 1, pp. 47-62.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 姜淑美、陳明麗、蔡佩珊(2005),國際股價指數現貨與期貨報酬外溢性及不對稱性效果之研究,經營管理論叢,vol. 1,No.2,23-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭彥菁(2009),「美國次級房貸風暴對台灣股匯市相關性之影響」,真理大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,1-79.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黎明淵、林修葳、郭憲章與楊聲勇(2003),美、日股市巨幅波動下的股市連動效果–美國、日本與亞洲四小龍股市實證結果,證券市場發展,第十五期,117-145.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黎明淵(2002),高、低股市波動狀態下之雙重貝他係數檢測–美國、日本與亞洲四小龍股市實證研究,台灣管理學刊,第二卷第二期,99-118.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱建良、李彥賢、鄒易恁(2005),金融風暴對股市間波動性的連動性影響–ARJI模型,真理財金學報,第13期,1-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐清俊、林柏宇(2003),金融控股公司股價波動性之實證研究,遠東學報,第二十卷第四期,1-18.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐清俊、吳明恆(2003),美國、日本與台灣股票市場動態關係,遠東學報,第二十卷第二期,265-282.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王凱立、陳美玲(2003),亞洲金融風暴發生前後美國與台灣股市動態關聯之進一步研究,經濟論文叢刊 ,31:2,191-252.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 賴彥君(2007),美國次級房貸風暴對全球股價走勢的衝擊與影響-以DCC模型分析,國立政治大學經濟研究所學位論文zh_TW