dc.contributor.advisor | 廖四郎 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 曾彥盛 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | 曾彥盛 | zh_TW |
dc.date (日期) | 2007 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 8-Dec-2010 16:10:27 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 8-Dec-2010 16:10:27 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 8-Dec-2010 16:10:27 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0095352010 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49663 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 金融研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 95352010 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 96 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 自2007年爆發次級房貸風暴後,造成許多原本信用良好的企業出現財務危機,甚至倒閉,引發一連串公司間違約傳染的連鎖效應。因此,公司間或是產業間之榮枯是相互關聯的,且均會受到違約傳染和總體經濟因素的影響。另外,近年來新型態的信用衍生性商品逐漸發展起來,例如:遠期生效擔保債權憑證、擔保債權憑證選擇權等,這些商品與以往不同的地方,是與時間有著強烈的相關性,而以往評價常用的單因子相關模型,因其無法描述損失分配的期間結構,造成無法評價與時間高度相關的信用衍生性商品。是以,許多學者開始研究動態的信用違約模型,藉此描述損失分配的期間結構。因此,本研究結合違約傳染效果與動態信用違約模型,假設個別公司存活機率之對數轉換服從跳躍過程,並將資產池內的資產分為傳染公司與被傳染公司,發展出容易執行與從市場資料校準參數的動態違約傳染模型。之後利用市場上的資料校準模型參數,並說明次級房貸風暴發生前後,參數改變的結果。結果反應出發生次級房貸風暴後,傳染效果與總體經濟因素的變數明顯的變大,且損失分配的重心明顯的向右方移動,與事實一致。除此之外,利用校準出的參數評價遠期生效擔保債權憑證與擔保債權憑證選擇權,並分析參數改變對於擔保債權憑證選擇權的變化,發現傳染效果和跳躍高度與擔保債權憑證選擇權是反向關係,而回復率與擔保債權憑證選擇權是正向關係。最後計算擔保債權憑證選擇權之避險參數,提供避險者避險決策的依據。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論.............................................1第一節 擔保債權憑證之發展現況與商品結構.....................1第二節 遠期生效擔保債權憑證與擔保債權憑證選擇權之商品結構.....5第三節 研究動機與目的.....................................6第四節 研究架構與流程.....................................8第二章 文獻探討..........................................10第一節 信用風險模型簡介...................................10第二節 動態信用違約模型...................................11第三節 傳染效果模型.......................................13第三章 研究方法與模型設定..................................15第一節 考慮傳染效果下的動態信用型...........................15第二節 建構累積損失分配....................................20第三節 擔保債權憑證的評價..................................22第四節 評價遠期生效擔保債權憑證.............................25第五節 評價擔保債權憑證選擇權..............................26第六節 擔保債權憑證選擇權的避險參數.........................29第四章 實證分析...........................................31第一節 校準模型參數與參數分析..............................31第二節 擔保債權憑證結果分析................................37第三節 遠期生效擔保債權憑證之評價與分析......................40第四節 擔保債權憑證選擇權之評價與分析.......................41第五節 擔保債權憑證選擇權之避險參數.........................46第五章 結論與建議.........................................47第一節 結論..............................................47第二節 後續研究建議.......................................49參考文獻 ..................................................50 | zh_TW |
dc.format.extent | 75731 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 169502 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 189174 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 202760 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 259306 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 318210 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 230476 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 382222 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 787539 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 218750 bytes | - |
dc.format.extent | 205829 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095352010 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 動態違約傳染模型 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 擔保債權憑證 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 遠期生效擔保債權憑證 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 擔保債權憑證選擇權 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | 擔保債權憑證選擇權之評價與分析--動態違約傳染模型之應用 | zh_TW |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Andersen, L. (2006), “Portfolio Losses in Factor Models: Term Structures and Intertemporal Loss Dependence,” Working Paper, Bank of America. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ang, A. and J. Chen, (2002), “Asymmetric Correlations of Equity Portfolios,” Journal of Financial Economics, 63, 443-494 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bennani, N, (2005), “The Forward Loss Model: A Dynamic Term Structure Approach for the Pricing of Portfolio Credit Risk,” Working Paper, The Royal Bank of Scotland. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Black, F., (1976), “The Pricing of Commodity Contracts,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 167-179. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brigo, D., A. Pallavicini and R. Torresetti, (2007), “Calibration of CDO Tranches with the Dynamical Generalized-Poisson Loss Model,” Risk 20, 70-75. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Davis, M. and V. Lo (2001), “Infectious defaults,” Quantitative Finance, 1, 382-387. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Duffie, D. and N. Gârleanu (2001), “Risk and the Valuation of Collateralized Debt Obligations,” Finance Analysis Journal 57(1), 41-59. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Giesecke, K. and S. Weber, (2006), “Credit contagion and aggregate losses,” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 30 , 741-767. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Herbertsson, A. and H. Rootzén, (2006), “Pricing k-th-to-default Swaps Under Default Contagion: The matrix-analytic approach,” Working Paper. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hull, J. and A. White, (2004), “Valuation of a CDO and nth to Default CDS without Monte Carlo Simulation,” Journal of Derivatives, 12, 8-23. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hull, J. and A. White, (2006), “Valuing Credit Derivatives Using an Implied Copula Approach,” Journal of Derivatives, 14, 8-28. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hull, J. and A. White, (2007a), “Forward and European Options on CDO Tranches,” Journal of Credit Risk, 3, 63-73. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hull, J. and A. White, (2007b), “Dynamic Models of Portfolio Credit Risk: A Simplified Approach,” Working Paper, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management University of Toronto. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jarrow, R. and S. Turnbull, (1995), “Pricing derivaties on financial securities subject to credit risk,” Journal of Finance, 50, 53-85. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jarrow, R. and F. Yu, (2001), “Counterparty risk and the pricing of defaultable securities,” The Journal of Finance 56, 1765-1799. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Li, D.X. (2000), “On Default Correlation: A Copula Function Approach,” Journal of Fixed Income 9 , 43-54. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Longstaff, F. and A. Rajan, (2006), “An Empirical Analysis of the Pricing of Collateralized Debt Obligations,” Working Paper, UCLA. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Merton, R., (1974), “On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates,” Journal of Finance, 29, 449-470. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rösch, D. and B. Winterfeldt, (2007), “Estimating Credit Contagion in a Standard Factor Model,” Working Paper, University of Regensburg. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schönbucher, P., (2003), “Information-Driven Default Contagion,” Working Paper, ETH Zurich. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schönbucher, P., (2005), “Portfolio Losses and the Term Structure of Loss Transition Rates: A New Methodology for Pricing Portfolio Credit Derivatives,” Working Paper, ETH Zurich. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Servigny, A. and O. Renault, (2002), “Default Correlation: Empirical Evidence,” Working Paper, Standard and Poors. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sidenius, J., V. Piterbarg and L. Andersen, (2004), “A New Framework for Dynamic Credit Portfolio Loss Modeling,” Working Paper, Bank of America. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Walker, M., (2007), “CDO Valuation: Term Structure, Tranche Structure, and Loss Distributions,” Working Paper. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳文萱,(2007),「擔保債權憑證選擇權之評價與避險:跨期因子相關結構性模型之運用」,國立政治大學金融所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳欣怡,(2007),「考慮違約傳染效應下合成型擔保債權憑證之評價與避險」,國立政治大學金融所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |