學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 延伸共同邊界模型至麥氏生產力指數探討西歐各國銀行效率與生產力變動
作者 陳盈昭
貢獻者 黃台心
陳盈昭
關鍵詞 共同邊界
Malmquist指數
技術效率
技術缺口比率
資料包絡分析法
日期 2008
上傳時間 8-Dec-2010 16:15:53 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究以Rao(2006)的MMPI為基礎,在距離函數觀念下將MMPI進行拆解,分解成技術效率變動、技術變動、規模變動以及追趕項,再將追趕成份,進一步拆解為「技術追趕」(catch-up in technology, 簡稱CUT) 與「潛在技術變動」(potential technological change, PTC),其中,CUT又可再分解為變動規模報酬之下的效率追趕(catch-up in efficiency, CUE)及規模追趕 (catch-up in scale, CUS)。實證上,利用1993-2007年間,15個歐洲國家的財務報表資料,運用DEA法分析西歐金融機構之經營效率,並進行生產力的推估與拆解,同時結合共同邊界的分析架構,從事群組國家間比較分析。
實證結果發現,MMPI表現突出的群組,主要來自於技術效率的進步,例如:北歐三國群組和奧地利;其次是規模效率的進步,例如:北歐三國與法國;最後才是技術變動,例如法國。而在十個國家群組中,除了義大利的MMPI退步以及奧地利的規模效率呈現持平外,其餘八個群組的MMPI與其三個構成項目,都呈現同升同降的相同趨勢,不同處僅在於變動幅度大小。例如MMPI都呈現進步的情形,其構成項目,分別表現出技術退步、技術效率進步以及規模效率進步。這樣的結果可能來自於歐洲單一市場的運作方式。
又依MMPI統計差異性檢定的結果,我們可以將原先依MMPI數值大小排序的十個國家群組,重新考慮群組間統計上差異及無差異的情形,合併為五個層次的生產力成長情形,第一層為北歐三國,MMPI成長最快,其次為奧地利、法國、比利時,再次為荷葡西英群組,第四層是盧森堡、瑞士,最末層則為德國、丹麥及義大利。
參考文獻 1. 黃台心、姜麗智、Kuan-Chen Chen、邱柏豪,An Application of the Meta-frontier Cost Function to the Study of Bank Efficiencies and Technology Gaps in 16 European Countries.,管理評論,2009,已接受刊登。
2. 陳谷劦、楊浩彥 (2008) 共同邊界 Malmquist 指數的延伸 : 跨國總體資料的實證分析,經濟論文叢刊,36:4,551-580。
3. 陳盈秀 (2007),OECD 與APEC 諸國總體生產效率與總要素生產力之研究─共同邊界函數之應用,淡江大學產業經濟學系,研究所博士論文。
4. 邱郁芳 (2006),應用共同成本函數探討東亞六國銀行業之生產效率,淡江大學經濟學系,研究所碩士論文。
5. 邱柏豪 (2006),應用共同成本函數探討歐洲16國銀行業的生產效率,交通大學財務金融學系,研究所碩士論文。
6. Assaf, A. and Matawie, K. (2008), Cost efficiency modeling in healthcare foodservice operations, International Journal of Hospitality Management, in press.
7. B Casu, C Girardone, P Molyneux (2004), Productivity change in European banking: A comparison of parametric and non-parametric approaches, Journal of Banking and Finance, Volume 28, Issue 10, October 2004, 2521-2540
8. Battese, G.E. and T.J. Coelli (1992), Frontier productions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 153-169.
9. Battese, G. E. and D. S. P. Rao, (2002), Technology Gap, Efficiency and a Stochastic Metafrontier Function, International Journal of Business and Economics 1, 1–7.
10. Battese, G. E. , D. S. P. Rao, and C.J. O`Donnell (2004), A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies, Journal of Productivity Analysis 21, 91-103.
11. Bos, J.W.B. and H. Schmiedel (2003), Comparing Efficiency in European Banking: A Meta Frontier Approach, De Nederlandsche Bank Research Paper No. 57.
12. Bos, J.W.B. and H. Schmiedel (2007), Is there a single frontier in a single European banking market?, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 31, 2081-2102.
13. C.J. O`Donnell , D. S. P. Rao, and Battese, G. E., (2008), Metafrontier Frameworks for the Study of Firm-Level Efficiencies and Technology Ratios, Empirical Economics 34, 231-255.
14. Chauveau, T. and J. Couppey. (2000). Les Banques Franc﹐ aises de Re’ seaux n’ont pas de Proble" mes Majeurs d’Inefficacite’Productive: Une Application de la Technique d’Enveloppement des Donne’es(DEA). Revue Economique 51(6), 1355-1380.
15. Dervaux, B., Ferrier, G. D., Leleu, H., Valdmanis, V. (2004), Comparing French and US hospital technologies: a directional input distance function approach, Applied Economics, 2004; 36(10), 1065.
16. Dietsch, M., Weill, L. (1999). Les Performances des Banques Francaises de Depots: Une Evaluation par la Methode DEA. Hermes Science Publications, Paris.
17. Farrell, M. J. (1957), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Part 3, 120.
18. Ferrier, GD. and Valdmanis, VG.(2004). Do mergers Imrove Hospital Productivity, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(10), 1071-1080.
19. Hayami, Y., (1969), Sources of Agricultural Productivity Gap among Selected Countries, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 51, 564-575.
20. Hayami, Y. and V. W. Ruttan, (1970), Agricultural Productivity Differences Among Countries, American Economic Review 60, 895-911.
21. Hayami, Y. and V. W. Ruttan, (1971), Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
22. Kawagoe, T. and Y. Hayami (1985), An intercountry comparison of agricultural production efficiency, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67, 87-92.
23. Kawagoe, T., Y. Hayami and V.W. Ruttan (1985), The intercountry agricultural production function and productivity differences among countries, Journal of Development Economics, 19, 113-132.
24. Lau, L. J. and P. A. Yotopoulos, (1989), The Meta-Production Function Approach to Technological Change in World Agriculture, Journal of Development Economics 31, 241-269.
25. Laurent Weill (2004), Measuring Cost Efficiency in European Banking: A Comparison of Frontier Techniques, Journal of Productivity Analysis 21, 133-152.
26. Lozano-Vivas, A., J. T. Pastor and J. M. Pastor (2002), An Efficiency Comparison of European Banking Systems operating under Different Environmental Conditions, Journal of Productivity Analysis 18, 59-77.
27. Rao, D.S.P. (2006), Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencyes and technology gaps, presented at Conference on Productivity and Efficiency, March, Taipei, Taiwan, 21- 49.
28. Nishimizu, M., J. M. Page, and Jr. (1982). Total Factor Productivity Growth, Technological Progress and Technical Efficiency Change: Dimensions of Productivity Change in Yugoslavia, Economic Journal, 1965–78.
29. S. Atkinson and C. Cornwell (1998), Estimating radial measures of productivity growth: frontier versus non-frontier approaches, Journal of Productivity Analysis 10, 35–46.
30. S. C. Kumbhakar and D. Wang (2007), Economic reforms, efficiency and productivity in Chinese banking, Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 32(2), 105-129.
31. Shao, Benjamin, and Shu, Wesley (2004), Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Information Technology Industries, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Number 55, 23 – 33.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
金融研究所
96352008
97
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096352008
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 黃台心zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳盈昭zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 陳盈昭zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned 8-Dec-2010 16:15:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 8-Dec-2010 16:15:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 8-Dec-2010 16:15:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0096352008en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49666-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 金融研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96352008zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究以Rao(2006)的MMPI為基礎,在距離函數觀念下將MMPI進行拆解,分解成技術效率變動、技術變動、規模變動以及追趕項,再將追趕成份,進一步拆解為「技術追趕」(catch-up in technology, 簡稱CUT) 與「潛在技術變動」(potential technological change, PTC),其中,CUT又可再分解為變動規模報酬之下的效率追趕(catch-up in efficiency, CUE)及規模追趕 (catch-up in scale, CUS)。實證上,利用1993-2007年間,15個歐洲國家的財務報表資料,運用DEA法分析西歐金融機構之經營效率,並進行生產力的推估與拆解,同時結合共同邊界的分析架構,從事群組國家間比較分析。
實證結果發現,MMPI表現突出的群組,主要來自於技術效率的進步,例如:北歐三國群組和奧地利;其次是規模效率的進步,例如:北歐三國與法國;最後才是技術變動,例如法國。而在十個國家群組中,除了義大利的MMPI退步以及奧地利的規模效率呈現持平外,其餘八個群組的MMPI與其三個構成項目,都呈現同升同降的相同趨勢,不同處僅在於變動幅度大小。例如MMPI都呈現進步的情形,其構成項目,分別表現出技術退步、技術效率進步以及規模效率進步。這樣的結果可能來自於歐洲單一市場的運作方式。
又依MMPI統計差異性檢定的結果,我們可以將原先依MMPI數值大小排序的十個國家群組,重新考慮群組間統計上差異及無差異的情形,合併為五個層次的生產力成長情形,第一層為北歐三國,MMPI成長最快,其次為奧地利、法國、比利時,再次為荷葡西英群組,第四層是盧森堡、瑞士,最末層則為德國、丹麥及義大利。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節  研究背景 1
第二節  研究動機 2
第三節  研究架構 3
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節 早期的共同生產函數相關文獻 5
第二節 共同邊界生產函數模型的演進 6
第三節 共同邊界方法的應用 8
第四節 生產力之研究 10
第三章 研究方法 14
第一節 距離函數(distance function)簡介 14
第二節 共同邊界與群組邊界 16
第三節 資料包絡分析法 18
第四節 生產力衡量 19
第四章 資料蒐集與整理 25
第一節 資料來源與整理 25
第二節 變數定義 25
第三節 樣本統計量 26
第五章 實證結果分析 29
第一節 TE及TGR的比較 29
第二節 各國MMPI比較與MMPI變動原因 33
第三節 MMPI與GMPI是否一致? 35
第四節 MMPI與GMPI的時間趨勢變化 39
第五節 MMPI平均值差異性檢定 47
第六節 銀行規模與生產力之關係 51
第六章 結論與建議 53
參考文獻 55
附錄 58
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 95928 bytes-
dc.format.extent 121256 bytes-
dc.format.extent 145504 bytes-
dc.format.extent 189299 bytes-
dc.format.extent 232973 bytes-
dc.format.extent 274450 bytes-
dc.format.extent 190009 bytes-
dc.format.extent 373712 bytes-
dc.format.extent 214479 bytes-
dc.format.extent 145347 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096352008en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 共同邊界zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Malmquist指數zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 技術效率zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 技術缺口比率zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資料包絡分析法zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 延伸共同邊界模型至麥氏生產力指數探討西歐各國銀行效率與生產力變動zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. 黃台心、姜麗智、Kuan-Chen Chen、邱柏豪,An Application of the Meta-frontier Cost Function to the Study of Bank Efficiencies and Technology Gaps in 16 European Countries.,管理評論,2009,已接受刊登。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. 陳谷劦、楊浩彥 (2008) 共同邊界 Malmquist 指數的延伸 : 跨國總體資料的實證分析,經濟論文叢刊,36:4,551-580。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. 陳盈秀 (2007),OECD 與APEC 諸國總體生產效率與總要素生產力之研究─共同邊界函數之應用,淡江大學產業經濟學系,研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. 邱郁芳 (2006),應用共同成本函數探討東亞六國銀行業之生產效率,淡江大學經濟學系,研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. 邱柏豪 (2006),應用共同成本函數探討歐洲16國銀行業的生產效率,交通大學財務金融學系,研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. Assaf, A. and Matawie, K. (2008), Cost efficiency modeling in healthcare foodservice operations, International Journal of Hospitality Management, in press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. B Casu, C Girardone, P Molyneux (2004), Productivity change in European banking: A comparison of parametric and non-parametric approaches, Journal of Banking and Finance, Volume 28, Issue 10, October 2004, 2521-2540zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. Battese, G.E. and T.J. Coelli (1992), Frontier productions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 153-169.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. Battese, G. E. and D. S. P. Rao, (2002), Technology Gap, Efficiency and a Stochastic Metafrontier Function, International Journal of Business and Economics 1, 1–7.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. Battese, G. E. , D. S. P. Rao, and C.J. O`Donnell (2004), A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies, Journal of Productivity Analysis 21, 91-103.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. Bos, J.W.B. and H. Schmiedel (2003), Comparing Efficiency in European Banking: A Meta Frontier Approach, De Nederlandsche Bank Research Paper No. 57.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. Bos, J.W.B. and H. Schmiedel (2007), Is there a single frontier in a single European banking market?, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 31, 2081-2102.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13. C.J. O`Donnell , D. S. P. Rao, and Battese, G. E., (2008), Metafrontier Frameworks for the Study of Firm-Level Efficiencies and Technology Ratios, Empirical Economics 34, 231-255.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14. Chauveau, T. and J. Couppey. (2000). Les Banques Franc﹐ aises de Re’ seaux n’ont pas de Proble" mes Majeurs d’Inefficacite’Productive: Une Application de la Technique d’Enveloppement des Donne’es(DEA). Revue Economique 51(6), 1355-1380.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15. Dervaux, B., Ferrier, G. D., Leleu, H., Valdmanis, V. (2004), Comparing French and US hospital technologies: a directional input distance function approach, Applied Economics, 2004; 36(10), 1065.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16. Dietsch, M., Weill, L. (1999). Les Performances des Banques Francaises de Depots: Une Evaluation par la Methode DEA. Hermes Science Publications, Paris.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17. Farrell, M. J. (1957), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Part 3, 120.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18. Ferrier, GD. and Valdmanis, VG.(2004). Do mergers Imrove Hospital Productivity, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(10), 1071-1080.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19. Hayami, Y., (1969), Sources of Agricultural Productivity Gap among Selected Countries, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 51, 564-575.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20. Hayami, Y. and V. W. Ruttan, (1970), Agricultural Productivity Differences Among Countries, American Economic Review 60, 895-911.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21. Hayami, Y. and V. W. Ruttan, (1971), Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22. Kawagoe, T. and Y. Hayami (1985), An intercountry comparison of agricultural production efficiency, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67, 87-92.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23. Kawagoe, T., Y. Hayami and V.W. Ruttan (1985), The intercountry agricultural production function and productivity differences among countries, Journal of Development Economics, 19, 113-132.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24. Lau, L. J. and P. A. Yotopoulos, (1989), The Meta-Production Function Approach to Technological Change in World Agriculture, Journal of Development Economics 31, 241-269.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25. Laurent Weill (2004), Measuring Cost Efficiency in European Banking: A Comparison of Frontier Techniques, Journal of Productivity Analysis 21, 133-152.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26. Lozano-Vivas, A., J. T. Pastor and J. M. Pastor (2002), An Efficiency Comparison of European Banking Systems operating under Different Environmental Conditions, Journal of Productivity Analysis 18, 59-77.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27. Rao, D.S.P. (2006), Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencyes and technology gaps, presented at Conference on Productivity and Efficiency, March, Taipei, Taiwan, 21- 49.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28. Nishimizu, M., J. M. Page, and Jr. (1982). Total Factor Productivity Growth, Technological Progress and Technical Efficiency Change: Dimensions of Productivity Change in Yugoslavia, Economic Journal, 1965–78.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 29. S. Atkinson and C. Cornwell (1998), Estimating radial measures of productivity growth: frontier versus non-frontier approaches, Journal of Productivity Analysis 10, 35–46.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 30. S. C. Kumbhakar and D. Wang (2007), Economic reforms, efficiency and productivity in Chinese banking, Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 32(2), 105-129.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 31. Shao, Benjamin, and Shu, Wesley (2004), Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Information Technology Industries, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Number 55, 23 – 33.zh_TW