Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 幼稚園教師對美術活動教學態度之研究
A study of the kindergarten teachers’ attitude of teaching art
作者 高如瑩
貢獻者 范睿榛
高如瑩
關鍵詞 幼稚園教師
美術活動
教學態度
kindergarten teacher
art activity
teacher attitude
日期 2009
上傳時間 9-Dec-2010 09:03:58 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究旨在探討幼稚園教師對美術活動之教學態度,主要目的有三:一、編制「幼稚園教師美術活動教學態度問卷」;二、瞭解幼稚園教師對美術活動教學態度之實際情況;三、探討不同背景變項下幼稚園教師對美術活動教學態度之差異情形;四、根據研究結果提出具體建議,做為改善學前階段美術教育之參考。

本研究以調查研究法,調查與分析幼稚園教師對美術活動之教學態度,依據文獻探討的結果編製「幼稚園教師美術活動教學態度問卷」,並經專家效度檢驗以及問卷預試成立正式問卷及建立問卷的效度與信度(Cronbach’s α係數為 .886)。

本研究以台北縣公、私立幼稚園之教師為研究對象,並以「幼稚園教師美術活動教學態度問卷」為研究工具,共發放340份問卷,回收208份問卷,回收率為61%。調查所得資料以描述統計、卡方考驗、單因子變異數分析方法進行分析。

本研究之研究結果為:一、幼稚園教師對美術活動的教學態度分為四個主要取向,分別為「幼兒本位取向」、「美術本位取向」、「教師本位取向」,以及「較少干涉取向」。二、不同教學年資、年齡、專業領域、公私立園所之幼稚園教師在美術活動教學態度上有所差異。

最後,本研究依據研究結果,分別對幼稚園教師、相關教育單位,以及後續美術活動相關研究提出具體建議,以供參考。
The purpose of research is to investigate the kindergarten teachers’ attitude of teaching art. Four aims of this research are: 1. To compile the “Kindergarten Teachers’ Attitude of Art Activity Questionnaire” as the research tool. 2. To inquire current kindergarten teachers’ attitude of teaching art. 3. To analysis differences among teachers’ attitudes of teaching art on four distinct dimensions: years of teaching, age, professional knowledge of individual teachers, and the types of kindergarten (public and private). 4. To make suggestions for a teacher teaching art in kindergarten, related associations or departments, and someone interesting this topic.
Researcher designed the contents of “Kindergarten Teachers’ Attitude of Teaching Art Questionnaire” by following phrases: compile items of questionnaire from literature, evaluate items by five experts to build validity, and using statistical analysis to establish reliability (Cronbach’s α .886). Researcher randomly sampled 340 subjects from kindergartens in Taipei county and delivered the questionnaire and 208 samples were valid (61%). The data were analyzed using: descriptive statistics, χ2 test, one-way ANOVA, and LSD posterior comparisons.
The result was: 1. The mainly approaches of teachers’ attitude of teaching art are children-oriented approach, art-oriented approach, teacher-oriented approach, and little-intervention-oriented approach. 2. Significant differences of teachers’ attitude were found between teachers in different years of teaching, age, professional knowledge of individual teachers, and the type of kindergarten.
The researcher made recommendations to kindergarten teachers, education administrations, and further related research based on the conclusions.
參考文獻 中文部分
毛連塭、瞿立鶴、陳青青(1991)。師院生與師專生教學態度意願與能力之比較。教育部委託專案研究報告。
吳宗立、陳惠萍(2005)。國民小學教師閩南語教學態度之研究。國民教育研究集刊,13,209-229。
吳長鵬(2000)。視覺藝術的繪畫創作。創造思考教育,10,19-25。
吳長鵬(2008)。遊戲與學習。臺北:空大。
吳致秀(2003)。美國大學日語教師教學態度語教學方法之研究。國立台中技術學院學報,4,127-145。
李昭明、陳欣希譯(2008)。Rogoff B.著。人類發展的文化本質。臺北:心理。
周淑惠(2002)。幼兒教材教法---統整性課程取向。臺北:心理。
林惠敏(2003)。國小教師美術教學態度及其相關因素之研究。國教學報,15,253-288。
邱皓政(2000)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北:五南。
邱華慧(2006)。學前機構教師對幼兒學習美語態度之初探研究,弘光學報,48,145-155
洪蘭譯(1997)。(Gleitiman原著Psychology 3rd ed.)。心理學。臺北:遠流。
范瓊方(1996)。幼兒繪畫心理分析與輔導。臺北:心理。
范瓊方(1996)。幼兒繪畫的教育功能。美育,77,37-44。
范瓊方(1999)。兒童繪畫與自我調整的關係。美育,103,9-14。
范瓊方(2002)。九年一貫藝術教育與幼兒藝術教育之關係。中小學一般藝術教育師資培育學術與實務研討會論文集,293-308。
張昕暢等譯(2005) 。藝術論︰一位文豪托爾斯泰的藝術感悟。托爾斯泰原著。中國:中國人民大學。
張春興(1999)。現代心理學。臺北:東華。
張春興、汪榮才譯(1976)。Lorce, M.R.著。洛氏教育心理學。臺北:大聖。
許良榮、柯玉婷(2001)。台中地區國小職前與在職教師對科學本質的理解與教學態度之研究。臺中師院學報,15,335-361。
許惠子(1995)。教學態度與師生互動---國小四年級一個班級個案研究。初等教育研究集刊,3,217-222。
郭禎祥(1992)。中美兩國藝術教育。臺北:文景。
郭禎祥(1998)。台灣藝術教育之現況及改進之道。國立彰化師範大學美術系。
郭禎祥(1999)。二十一世紀藝術教育的展望。美育,106,1-9。
郭禎祥譯(1991)。Eisner E. W.著。藝術視覺的教育。臺北:文景。
陳英豪、吳裕益、李坤崇(1990)。教師態度量表之修訂報告。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,37,25-34。
陳英豪、汪榮才、劉佑星、李坤崇(1992)。新制師院生教學態度及其相關因素之研究。臺南師院學報,25,1-28。
陳朝平(2002)。視覺藝術教學研究。載於黃壬來(主編),藝術與人文教育(439-462頁)。臺北:桂冠圖書。
陳琪婷、林慧菁(2006)。高(中)職餐飲管理科教師個人屬性及餐飲技能檢定與教學態度之相關研究。餐旅暨家政學刊,3(1),77-92。
陳瓊花(2004)。視覺藝術教育。臺北:三民。
陳鏡潭、陳炯彰、黃偉蓉(1994)。師院國小師資班結業生角色知覺、任教職志、教學態度、工作滿意度與教學狀況。教育研究資訊,2(3),71-88。
黃壬來(1999)。美術創作的內涵。文化生活,(2)3,19-21。
黃淑嫆、莊麗珠(2008)。幼兒教師對創意教學態度之研究。幼教研究彙刊,1(2),151-166。
劉婉珍(2001)。美術教育領域中的態度研究--北美地區教師態度測量方法初探。現代美術學報,4,83-103。
劉豐榮(1991)。艾斯納藝術教育思想研究。臺北:水牛。
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究理論與應用。臺北:心理。
蔡志權、吳昇光(2003)。體育教師指導身心障礙學生之自覺能力與教學態度相關之探討。大專體育,64,108-114。
盧美貴(1994)。開放式幼兒活動設計:夏山學校對我國幼教的啟示。臺北:心理。
蕭慶元(2008)。高雄縣市教師對於幼兒視覺藝術教育的信念─以學習與發展為起點。屏東教育大學學報:人文社會類,31,33-64。
戴興豪、風貞豪(2006)。新竹縣市公私立高中職體育教師教學態度之研究。清雲學報,26(2),171-180。
謝向棠(2007)。中學體育教師應有之教學態度。學校體育,17(3),93-96。
簡楚瑛(1993)。義大利瑞吉歐學前教育系統對我國學前教育之課程與教學的啟示。教育研究資訊,1(6),111-121
蘇振明、鄒品梅、鄭明進、方朱憲、陳明華(1998)。藝術教育教師手冊─幼兒美術篇。臺北:國立臺灣藝術教育館。
英文部分
Apple, K. (1993, January 1). Is Art a Frill? Elementary Teachers` Attitudes toward Art. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED361272)
Bresler, L (1993). Three orientations to arts in the primary grades: Implications for curriculum reform. Arts Education Policy Review, 94(6), 29.
Dewey, J. (1957). Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan
Eisner, E. W. (1972). Educating Artistic Vision. NYC: Harper & Row.
Feldman, E. B. (1984). Art as image and idea. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Feldman, E. B. (1996). Philosophy of art education. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Lowenfeld, V. & Brittain, W. L. (1970). Creative and mental growth. (8th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Luehrman, M. (2002) Art Experiences and Attitude toward Art Education: A Descriptive Study of Missouri Public School Principals. Studies in Art Education, 43(3), 197-218
Maureen, V. C. & Anna R. (2000). The effect of three different educational approaches on children`s drawing ability: Steiner, Montessori and traditional. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 485.
Oreck B. (2004). The artistic and professional development of teachers: A study of teachers` attitudes toward and use of the arts in teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(1), 55-69.
Pigge, F. & Marso, R. (1997, March). Development of Attitude toward Teaching Career in a Longitudinal Sample of Teacher Candidates Progressing through Preparation and Five Years of Teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Pigge, F. & Marso, R. (1998, February). A Longitudinal Study of Relationships between Attitude toward Teaching, Anxiety about Teaching, Self-Perceived Effectiveness, and Attrition from Teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Dallas, TX.
Rosario & Collazo (1981). Aesthetic Codes in Context: An Exploration in Two Preschool Classrooms. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 15(1), 71-82.
Rose, Jolley & Burkitt.(2006). A Review of Children’s, Teachers’ and Parents’ Influences on Children’s Drawing Experience. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 25(3), 50-56.
Short, Kauffman, & Kahn. (2000). "I just need to draw": Responding to literature across multiple sign systems. The Reading Teacher, 54(2), 160-171.
Toren, Z. (2007). Attitude Towards Artwork in the Israeli Kindergarten and the Reproduction of Social Status. Studies in Art Education, 48(2), 172-188.
Unsworth, J. (2001). Everyone Can Draw. Arts and Activities, 129(2), 29.
Walker, K. (2007). Children and Their Purple Crayons: Understanding Their Worlds Through Their Drawings. Childhood Education, 84(2), 96-101.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
幼兒教育所
96157001
98
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096157001
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 范睿榛zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 高如瑩zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 高如瑩zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-Dec-2010 09:03:58 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-Dec-2010 09:03:58 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-Dec-2010 09:03:58 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0096157001en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49769-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 幼兒教育所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96157001zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在探討幼稚園教師對美術活動之教學態度,主要目的有三:一、編制「幼稚園教師美術活動教學態度問卷」;二、瞭解幼稚園教師對美術活動教學態度之實際情況;三、探討不同背景變項下幼稚園教師對美術活動教學態度之差異情形;四、根據研究結果提出具體建議,做為改善學前階段美術教育之參考。

本研究以調查研究法,調查與分析幼稚園教師對美術活動之教學態度,依據文獻探討的結果編製「幼稚園教師美術活動教學態度問卷」,並經專家效度檢驗以及問卷預試成立正式問卷及建立問卷的效度與信度(Cronbach’s α係數為 .886)。

本研究以台北縣公、私立幼稚園之教師為研究對象,並以「幼稚園教師美術活動教學態度問卷」為研究工具,共發放340份問卷,回收208份問卷,回收率為61%。調查所得資料以描述統計、卡方考驗、單因子變異數分析方法進行分析。

本研究之研究結果為:一、幼稚園教師對美術活動的教學態度分為四個主要取向,分別為「幼兒本位取向」、「美術本位取向」、「教師本位取向」,以及「較少干涉取向」。二、不同教學年資、年齡、專業領域、公私立園所之幼稚園教師在美術活動教學態度上有所差異。

最後,本研究依據研究結果,分別對幼稚園教師、相關教育單位,以及後續美術活動相關研究提出具體建議,以供參考。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of research is to investigate the kindergarten teachers’ attitude of teaching art. Four aims of this research are: 1. To compile the “Kindergarten Teachers’ Attitude of Art Activity Questionnaire” as the research tool. 2. To inquire current kindergarten teachers’ attitude of teaching art. 3. To analysis differences among teachers’ attitudes of teaching art on four distinct dimensions: years of teaching, age, professional knowledge of individual teachers, and the types of kindergarten (public and private). 4. To make suggestions for a teacher teaching art in kindergarten, related associations or departments, and someone interesting this topic.
Researcher designed the contents of “Kindergarten Teachers’ Attitude of Teaching Art Questionnaire” by following phrases: compile items of questionnaire from literature, evaluate items by five experts to build validity, and using statistical analysis to establish reliability (Cronbach’s α .886). Researcher randomly sampled 340 subjects from kindergartens in Taipei county and delivered the questionnaire and 208 samples were valid (61%). The data were analyzed using: descriptive statistics, χ2 test, one-way ANOVA, and LSD posterior comparisons.
The result was: 1. The mainly approaches of teachers’ attitude of teaching art are children-oriented approach, art-oriented approach, teacher-oriented approach, and little-intervention-oriented approach. 2. Significant differences of teachers’ attitude were found between teachers in different years of teaching, age, professional knowledge of individual teachers, and the type of kindergarten.
The researcher made recommendations to kindergarten teachers, education administrations, and further related research based on the conclusions.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 謝 辭 I
摘 要 II
目次 IV
圖次 VI
表次 VI
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 待答問題 4
第四節 名詞釋義 4
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 幼稚園美術活動 6
第二節 教師教學態度相關研究 9
第三節 教師對美術活動之教學態度 19
第四節 教師美術活動教學態度之相關因素 32
第三章 研究設計 34
第一節 研究架構 34
第二節 研究對象 35
第三節 研究方法 36
第四節 研究工具 37
第五節 資料處理 53
第四章 結果與討論 57
第一節 幼稚園教師對美術活動教學態度現況分析 57
第二節 不同背景變項教師之美術活動教學態度差異情形 59
第五章 結論與建議 69
第一節 研究結論 69
第二節 研究建議 72
參考書目 75
中文部分 75
英文部分 78
附錄 81
附錄一 幼稚園教師美術活動教學態度問卷---專家信效度問卷 81
附錄二 問卷之修改建議及修改後之問卷題項對照表 95
附錄三 幼稚園教師美術活動教學態度問卷---預試問卷 101
附錄四 幼稚園教師美術活動教學態度問卷---正式問卷 106
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 935634 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096157001en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 幼稚園教師zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 美術活動zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 教學態度zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) kindergarten teacheren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) art activityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) teacher attitudeen_US
dc.title (題名) 幼稚園教師對美術活動教學態度之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A study of the kindergarten teachers’ attitude of teaching arten_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 毛連塭、瞿立鶴、陳青青(1991)。師院生與師專生教學態度意願與能力之比較。教育部委託專案研究報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳宗立、陳惠萍(2005)。國民小學教師閩南語教學態度之研究。國民教育研究集刊,13,209-229。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳長鵬(2000)。視覺藝術的繪畫創作。創造思考教育,10,19-25。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳長鵬(2008)。遊戲與學習。臺北:空大。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳致秀(2003)。美國大學日語教師教學態度語教學方法之研究。國立台中技術學院學報,4,127-145。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李昭明、陳欣希譯(2008)。Rogoff B.著。人類發展的文化本質。臺北:心理。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周淑惠(2002)。幼兒教材教法---統整性課程取向。臺北:心理。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林惠敏(2003)。國小教師美術教學態度及其相關因素之研究。國教學報,15,253-288。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱皓政(2000)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱華慧(2006)。學前機構教師對幼兒學習美語態度之初探研究,弘光學報,48,145-155zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 洪蘭譯(1997)。(Gleitiman原著Psychology 3rd ed.)。心理學。臺北:遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 范瓊方(1996)。幼兒繪畫心理分析與輔導。臺北:心理。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 范瓊方(1996)。幼兒繪畫的教育功能。美育,77,37-44。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 范瓊方(1999)。兒童繪畫與自我調整的關係。美育,103,9-14。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 范瓊方(2002)。九年一貫藝術教育與幼兒藝術教育之關係。中小學一般藝術教育師資培育學術與實務研討會論文集,293-308。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張昕暢等譯(2005) 。藝術論︰一位文豪托爾斯泰的藝術感悟。托爾斯泰原著。中國:中國人民大學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張春興(1999)。現代心理學。臺北:東華。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張春興、汪榮才譯(1976)。Lorce, M.R.著。洛氏教育心理學。臺北:大聖。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許良榮、柯玉婷(2001)。台中地區國小職前與在職教師對科學本質的理解與教學態度之研究。臺中師院學報,15,335-361。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許惠子(1995)。教學態度與師生互動---國小四年級一個班級個案研究。初等教育研究集刊,3,217-222。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭禎祥(1992)。中美兩國藝術教育。臺北:文景。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭禎祥(1998)。台灣藝術教育之現況及改進之道。國立彰化師範大學美術系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭禎祥(1999)。二十一世紀藝術教育的展望。美育,106,1-9。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭禎祥譯(1991)。Eisner E. W.著。藝術視覺的教育。臺北:文景。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳英豪、吳裕益、李坤崇(1990)。教師態度量表之修訂報告。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,37,25-34。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳英豪、汪榮才、劉佑星、李坤崇(1992)。新制師院生教學態度及其相關因素之研究。臺南師院學報,25,1-28。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳朝平(2002)。視覺藝術教學研究。載於黃壬來(主編),藝術與人文教育(439-462頁)。臺北:桂冠圖書。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳琪婷、林慧菁(2006)。高(中)職餐飲管理科教師個人屬性及餐飲技能檢定與教學態度之相關研究。餐旅暨家政學刊,3(1),77-92。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳瓊花(2004)。視覺藝術教育。臺北:三民。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳鏡潭、陳炯彰、黃偉蓉(1994)。師院國小師資班結業生角色知覺、任教職志、教學態度、工作滿意度與教學狀況。教育研究資訊,2(3),71-88。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃壬來(1999)。美術創作的內涵。文化生活,(2)3,19-21。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃淑嫆、莊麗珠(2008)。幼兒教師對創意教學態度之研究。幼教研究彙刊,1(2),151-166。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉婉珍(2001)。美術教育領域中的態度研究--北美地區教師態度測量方法初探。現代美術學報,4,83-103。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉豐榮(1991)。艾斯納藝術教育思想研究。臺北:水牛。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究理論與應用。臺北:心理。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡志權、吳昇光(2003)。體育教師指導身心障礙學生之自覺能力與教學態度相關之探討。大專體育,64,108-114。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 盧美貴(1994)。開放式幼兒活動設計:夏山學校對我國幼教的啟示。臺北:心理。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蕭慶元(2008)。高雄縣市教師對於幼兒視覺藝術教育的信念─以學習與發展為起點。屏東教育大學學報:人文社會類,31,33-64。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 戴興豪、風貞豪(2006)。新竹縣市公私立高中職體育教師教學態度之研究。清雲學報,26(2),171-180。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝向棠(2007)。中學體育教師應有之教學態度。學校體育,17(3),93-96。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 簡楚瑛(1993)。義大利瑞吉歐學前教育系統對我國學前教育之課程與教學的啟示。教育研究資訊,1(6),111-121zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇振明、鄒品梅、鄭明進、方朱憲、陳明華(1998)。藝術教育教師手冊─幼兒美術篇。臺北:國立臺灣藝術教育館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Apple, K. (1993, January 1). Is Art a Frill? Elementary Teachers` Attitudes toward Art. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED361272)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bresler, L (1993). Three orientations to arts in the primary grades: Implications for curriculum reform. Arts Education Policy Review, 94(6), 29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dewey, J. (1957). Experience and Education. New York: Macmillanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eisner, E. W. (1972). Educating Artistic Vision. NYC: Harper & Row.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Feldman, E. B. (1984). Art as image and idea. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Feldman, E. B. (1996). Philosophy of art education. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lowenfeld, V. & Brittain, W. L. (1970). Creative and mental growth. (8th ed.). New York: Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Luehrman, M. (2002) Art Experiences and Attitude toward Art Education: A Descriptive Study of Missouri Public School Principals. Studies in Art Education, 43(3), 197-218zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Maureen, V. C. & Anna R. (2000). The effect of three different educational approaches on children`s drawing ability: Steiner, Montessori and traditional. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 485.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oreck B. (2004). The artistic and professional development of teachers: A study of teachers` attitudes toward and use of the arts in teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(1), 55-69.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pigge, F. & Marso, R. (1997, March). Development of Attitude toward Teaching Career in a Longitudinal Sample of Teacher Candidates Progressing through Preparation and Five Years of Teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pigge, F. & Marso, R. (1998, February). A Longitudinal Study of Relationships between Attitude toward Teaching, Anxiety about Teaching, Self-Perceived Effectiveness, and Attrition from Teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Dallas, TX.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rosario & Collazo (1981). Aesthetic Codes in Context: An Exploration in Two Preschool Classrooms. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 15(1), 71-82.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rose, Jolley & Burkitt.(2006). A Review of Children’s, Teachers’ and Parents’ Influences on Children’s Drawing Experience. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 25(3), 50-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Short, Kauffman, & Kahn. (2000). "I just need to draw": Responding to literature across multiple sign systems. The Reading Teacher, 54(2), 160-171.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Toren, Z. (2007). Attitude Towards Artwork in the Israeli Kindergarten and the Reproduction of Social Status. Studies in Art Education, 48(2), 172-188.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Unsworth, J. (2001). Everyone Can Draw. Arts and Activities, 129(2), 29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Walker, K. (2007). Children and Their Purple Crayons: Understanding Their Worlds Through Their Drawings. Childhood Education, 84(2), 96-101.zh_TW