學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 結構性宰制:反反色情到反分級
Structural domination: from anti-antipornography to anti-censorship
作者 黃頌竹
貢獻者 鄭光明
黃頌竹
關鍵詞 兒童權利
色情
分級
宰制
言論自由
女性主義
麥金儂
奧斯汀
藍騰
巴特勒
言說行為
性解放
自由主義
父權
皮繩愉虐邦
反對假分級制度聯盟
Children`s Right
Pornography
Rating
Subordination
Freedom of Speech
Feminism
C. MacKinnon
J. L. Austin
R. Langton
J. Butler
Performative
Sex Liberation
Liberalism
Patriachy
Taiwan BDSM Company
Taiwan Anti-censorship Association
日期 2009
上傳時間 9-Dec-2010 10:55:32 (UTC+8)
摘要 言論分級的辦法,特別是與性有關的言論分級,往往持著「保護未成年人」的立場落實於政策中。將這種對未成年人的言論限制手段,透過個人道德的論述,建構成一個對於未成年人之人格及人身安全的保護措施。然而在這個巧妙的論述之下,卻掩蓋不住底下騷動不已的權力角逐。
回顧二十世紀八○年代的反色情女性主義論述,麥金儂直接指出「色情」的問題從來就不只是一個道德問題,而是關於政治、關於權力、關於社會結構的問題。事實是,種種對於未成年人可以接觸的資訊、言論施加之限制,也從來都不只是道德問題,而是(如女性主義者尖銳而正確的見解指出的)一個關於政治、權力、結構的問題。言論不只是意見,言論是具有能動性(agency)的。麥金儂表示言論對於社會現實的建構有著莫大的影響力,藍騰更使用奧斯汀的行動(performativity)理論來說明言論的能力。而巴特勒儘管在結論上反對反色情女性主義推動言論管制,卻也是基於肯定言論的行動力,對於言論管制往往剝奪傷害性言論的受害者在言說場域裡能夠自我賦權的機會,更透過公權力對此類言論與歧視結構的肯認,而有強化這個受害者結構的危機。
我將從巴特勒對言論管制手段的批判,以及對於如何透過言說關係的再利用,來試圖顛覆既有的權力關係。現有的所謂「保護」未成年人之言論限制政策,其實一方面是鞏固成年人對未成年人之權力關係,另一方面也是將未成年人的教育視為成年人彼此爭奪權力的場域。我將論證言論的管制策略不僅無法達到「保護」的效果,更是對未成年人之主體性建立的直接傷害:如果言論有建構社會結構,以及建構主體在社會結構中的位置之能力,剝奪這項能力,就是在剝奪未成年人透過性言論與現實世界進行交互辯證的能力,並剝奪其建立以及發展自我主體性之重要工具。
參考文獻 Antipornography Civil Rights Ordinance. (2010, April 9). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antipornography_Civil_Rights_Ordinance&oldid=354962821
Archard, D. W. (2006). Children`s rights. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rights-children/
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. J. O. Urmson & M. Sbisà (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Berlin, I. (1969). Four essays on liberty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Brighouse, H. (2003). How should children be heard? Arizona Law Review, 45(3), 691-711.
Butler, J. (1997). Excitable Speech. New York, NY: Routledge.
Butler, J. (2003). Beauvoir on Sade: Making sexuality into an ethic. In C. Card (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Simone de Beauvoir (pp. 168-188). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942).
Cline, V. B. (2001). Pornography`s effects on adults and children. New York, NY: Morality in Media, Inc.
Dworkin, A. (1974). Woman as victim: Story of O. Feminist Studies, 2(1), 107-111.
Dworkin, R. (1991a). Liberty and pornography. The New York Review of Books, 38(14), 12-15.
Dworkin, R. (1991b). Two concepts of liberty. In E. Ullmann-Margalit & A. Margalit (Ed.), Isaiah Berlin: A celebration (pp. 100-109). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Dworkin, R. (1993). Women and pornography. The New York Review of Books, 40(17), 36, 38, 40-42.
Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629 (1968).
Green, L. (1998). Pornographizing, subordinating, and silencing. In R. C. Post (Ed.), Censorship and Silencing: Practices of cultural regulation (pp. 285-311). Los Angeles, CA: Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities.
Hughes, D. R. (2001). How pornography harms children. Retrieved from
http://www.protectkids.com/effects/harms.htm
Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 (1964).
Langton, R. (1993). Speech acts and unspeakable acts. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22(4), 293-330.
Langton, R. (2009). Sexual solipsism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lo, V. & Wei, R. (2005). Exposure to internet pornography and Taiwanese adolescents` sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(2), 221-237.
Lovelace, L. & McGrady, M. (1980). Ordeal. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel Press.
MacKinnon, C. (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
MacKinnon, C. (1993). Only words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
MacKinnon, C. & Dworkin, A. (1997). (Ed.). In harm`s way: the pornography civil rights hearings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Matthews, G. B. (1982). Conceiving childhood: “Child animism”. Noûs, 16(1), 29-37.
Mill, J. S. (1998). On liberty and other essays. Gray, J. (Ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973).
Morgan, R. (1980). Theory and practice: Pornography and rape. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night (pp. 134-140). New York, NY: William Morrow.
Pareles, J. (1990, June 17). An album is judged obscene; Rap: Slick, violent, nasty and, maybe hopeful. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul, Minnesota, 505 U.S. 377 (1992).
Saint Paul, Minn. Legis. Code § 292.02 (1990).
Schapiro, T. (1999). What is a child? Ethics, 109(4), 715-738.
Taylor, T. (1795). A vindication of the rights of brutes. Boston, MA: Benjamin Sweetser & William Burdick. Available from http://jenda.lib.nccu.edu.tw/search~S5*cht/?searchtype=t&searcharg=A+Vindication+of+the+Rights+of+Brutes
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2009). International guidelines on sexuality education: An evidence informed approach to effective sex, relationships and HIV/STI education. Paris, France: UNESCO.
Wis. Stat. § 939.645 (1991).
Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 486 (1993).
Wolf, S. (1980). Asymmetrical freedom. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(3), 151-166.
Wollstonecraft, M. (1792). A vindication of the rights of woman. Boston, MA: Peter Edes. Retrieved from http://www.archive.org/stream/vindicationofrig00wollrich/vindicationofrig00wollrich_djvu.txt
Zillmann, D. (1989). Effects of prolonged consumption of pornography. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Pornography: Research advances and policy considerations (pp. 127-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
中華民國刑法(2010)。
出版品及錄影節目帶分級辦法(2005)。
何春蕤(1994)。豪爽女人。台北市:皇冠文學出版有限公司。
兒童及少年福利法(2010)。
兒童及少年性交易防制條例(2007)。
淫妲三代、端爺、洪凌合著(2006)。皮繩愉虐邦。台北市:性林文化出版。
許敏溶(2010年6月6日)。台大美女當明星「可惜」校長有感而發。蘋果日報。擷取自:http://tw.nextmedia.com/applenews/article/art_id/32566690/IssueID/20100606
黃詠梅(2008)。從「性虐待」到「皮繩愉虐邦」──考察台灣愉虐實踐的社群文化與集結政略。未出版之碩士論文,東海大學社會學研究所,台中市。
楊惠琪(2009年9月30日)。太早教恐「教壞小朋友」。蘋果日報。擷取自:http://tw.nextmedia.com/applenews/article/art_id/31937962/IssueID/20090913
詹炳耀主持(2006)。校園BBS站相關法律問題研究(九十五年教育部補助辦理資訊教育及網路學習推廣活動)。雲林縣:國立雲林科技大學科技法律研究所。擷取自:http://www.edu.tw/moecc/content.aspx?site_content_sn=5285
電腦網路內容分級處理辦法(2005)。
鄭光明(2009)。不可說的在言噤聲:藍騰的反色情論證。歐美研究,39(1),169-224。
釋字第四○七號解釋(1996)。司法院公報,38(8),15-32。
釋字第六一七號解釋(2007)。司法院公報,49(1),1-75。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
哲學研究所
93154006
98
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093154006
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 鄭光明zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 黃頌竹zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 黃頌竹zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-Dec-2010 10:55:32 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-Dec-2010 10:55:32 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-Dec-2010 10:55:32 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0093154006en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49848-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 哲學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93154006zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 言論分級的辦法,特別是與性有關的言論分級,往往持著「保護未成年人」的立場落實於政策中。將這種對未成年人的言論限制手段,透過個人道德的論述,建構成一個對於未成年人之人格及人身安全的保護措施。然而在這個巧妙的論述之下,卻掩蓋不住底下騷動不已的權力角逐。
回顧二十世紀八○年代的反色情女性主義論述,麥金儂直接指出「色情」的問題從來就不只是一個道德問題,而是關於政治、關於權力、關於社會結構的問題。事實是,種種對於未成年人可以接觸的資訊、言論施加之限制,也從來都不只是道德問題,而是(如女性主義者尖銳而正確的見解指出的)一個關於政治、權力、結構的問題。言論不只是意見,言論是具有能動性(agency)的。麥金儂表示言論對於社會現實的建構有著莫大的影響力,藍騰更使用奧斯汀的行動(performativity)理論來說明言論的能力。而巴特勒儘管在結論上反對反色情女性主義推動言論管制,卻也是基於肯定言論的行動力,對於言論管制往往剝奪傷害性言論的受害者在言說場域裡能夠自我賦權的機會,更透過公權力對此類言論與歧視結構的肯認,而有強化這個受害者結構的危機。
我將從巴特勒對言論管制手段的批判,以及對於如何透過言說關係的再利用,來試圖顛覆既有的權力關係。現有的所謂「保護」未成年人之言論限制政策,其實一方面是鞏固成年人對未成年人之權力關係,另一方面也是將未成年人的教育視為成年人彼此爭奪權力的場域。我將論證言論的管制策略不僅無法達到「保護」的效果,更是對未成年人之主體性建立的直接傷害:如果言論有建構社會結構,以及建構主體在社會結構中的位置之能力,剝奪這項能力,就是在剝奪未成年人透過性言論與現實世界進行交互辯證的能力,並剝奪其建立以及發展自我主體性之重要工具。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第二章 色情與女性主義 7
第一節 不平等的平等 10
第二節 不只是言論 13
第三節 反色情立法 16
第三章 言說與宰制 19
第一節 如何以言說行事 19
一、以言表意的行為 20
二、以言行事的行為 20
三、以言取效的行為 21
四、社會規約 22
第二節 色情是宰制的形式 24
一、宰制的言說行為 24
二、決斷性與具執行力之言說行為 25
三、色情宰制 26
第三節 色情噤聲 28
一、被噤聲的言論 29
二、被色情噤聲的女人 30
第四節 言論限制之正當性 32
第四章 言說與權力 34
第一節 結構宰制與個人自由 36
第二節 言說者言說語言 40
第三節 國家宰制與結構宰制 43
第四節 言說的力量,顛覆的力量 51
第五章 年齡與權力 59
第一節 分級辦法的道德關注 62
一、色情的傷害 63
二、價值觀的預設 66
三、個人主義的預設 68
第二節 未成年人論述 70
一、成熟/不成熟之階段假設 72
二、色情與未成熟之主體 75
第六章 結論 80
英文參考文獻 86
中文參考文獻 90
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1865122 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093154006en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 兒童權利zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 色情zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 分級zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 宰制zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 言論自由zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 女性主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 麥金儂zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 奧斯汀zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 藍騰zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 巴特勒zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 言說行為zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 性解放zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 自由主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 父權zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 皮繩愉虐邦zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 反對假分級制度聯盟zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Children`s Righten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Pornographyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Ratingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Subordinationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Freedom of Speechen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Feminismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) C. MacKinnonen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) J. L. Austinen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) R. Langtonen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) J. Butleren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Performativeen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Sex Liberationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Liberalismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Patriachyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Taiwan BDSM Companyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Taiwan Anti-censorship Associationen_US
dc.title (題名) 結構性宰制:反反色情到反分級zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Structural domination: from anti-antipornography to anti-censorshipen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Antipornography Civil Rights Ordinance. (2010, April 9). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antipornography_Civil_Rights_Ordinance&oldid=354962821zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Archard, D. W. (2006). Children`s rights. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rights-children/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. J. O. Urmson & M. Sbisà (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Berlin, I. (1969). Four essays on liberty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brighouse, H. (2003). How should children be heard? Arizona Law Review, 45(3), 691-711.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Butler, J. (1997). Excitable Speech. New York, NY: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Butler, J. (2003). Beauvoir on Sade: Making sexuality into an ethic. In C. Card (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Simone de Beauvoir (pp. 168-188). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cline, V. B. (2001). Pornography`s effects on adults and children. New York, NY: Morality in Media, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dworkin, A. (1974). Woman as victim: Story of O. Feminist Studies, 2(1), 107-111.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dworkin, R. (1991a). Liberty and pornography. The New York Review of Books, 38(14), 12-15.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dworkin, R. (1991b). Two concepts of liberty. In E. Ullmann-Margalit & A. Margalit (Ed.), Isaiah Berlin: A celebration (pp. 100-109). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dworkin, R. (1993). Women and pornography. The New York Review of Books, 40(17), 36, 38, 40-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629 (1968).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Green, L. (1998). Pornographizing, subordinating, and silencing. In R. C. Post (Ed.), Censorship and Silencing: Practices of cultural regulation (pp. 285-311). Los Angeles, CA: Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hughes, D. R. (2001). How pornography harms children. Retrieved fromzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.protectkids.com/effects/harms.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 (1964).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Langton, R. (1993). Speech acts and unspeakable acts. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22(4), 293-330.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Langton, R. (2009). Sexual solipsism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lo, V. & Wei, R. (2005). Exposure to internet pornography and Taiwanese adolescents` sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(2), 221-237.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lovelace, L. & McGrady, M. (1980). Ordeal. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) MacKinnon, C. (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) MacKinnon, C. (1993). Only words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) MacKinnon, C. & Dworkin, A. (1997). (Ed.). In harm`s way: the pornography civil rights hearings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Matthews, G. B. (1982). Conceiving childhood: “Child animism”. Noûs, 16(1), 29-37.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mill, J. S. (1998). On liberty and other essays. Gray, J. (Ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Morgan, R. (1980). Theory and practice: Pornography and rape. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night (pp. 134-140). New York, NY: William Morrow.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pareles, J. (1990, June 17). An album is judged obscene; Rap: Slick, violent, nasty and, maybe hopeful. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.comzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul, Minnesota, 505 U.S. 377 (1992).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Saint Paul, Minn. Legis. Code § 292.02 (1990).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schapiro, T. (1999). What is a child? Ethics, 109(4), 715-738.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Taylor, T. (1795). A vindication of the rights of brutes. Boston, MA: Benjamin Sweetser & William Burdick. Available from http://jenda.lib.nccu.edu.tw/search~S5*cht/?searchtype=t&searcharg=A+Vindication+of+the+Rights+of+Bruteszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2009). International guidelines on sexuality education: An evidence informed approach to effective sex, relationships and HIV/STI education. Paris, France: UNESCO.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wis. Stat. § 939.645 (1991).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 486 (1993).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wolf, S. (1980). Asymmetrical freedom. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(3), 151-166.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wollstonecraft, M. (1792). A vindication of the rights of woman. Boston, MA: Peter Edes. Retrieved from http://www.archive.org/stream/vindicationofrig00wollrich/vindicationofrig00wollrich_djvu.txtzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zillmann, D. (1989). Effects of prolonged consumption of pornography. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Pornography: Research advances and policy considerations (pp. 127-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中華民國刑法(2010)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 出版品及錄影節目帶分級辦法(2005)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 何春蕤(1994)。豪爽女人。台北市:皇冠文學出版有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 兒童及少年福利法(2010)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 兒童及少年性交易防制條例(2007)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 淫妲三代、端爺、洪凌合著(2006)。皮繩愉虐邦。台北市:性林文化出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許敏溶(2010年6月6日)。台大美女當明星「可惜」校長有感而發。蘋果日報。擷取自:http://tw.nextmedia.com/applenews/article/art_id/32566690/IssueID/20100606zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃詠梅(2008)。從「性虐待」到「皮繩愉虐邦」──考察台灣愉虐實踐的社群文化與集結政略。未出版之碩士論文,東海大學社會學研究所,台中市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊惠琪(2009年9月30日)。太早教恐「教壞小朋友」。蘋果日報。擷取自:http://tw.nextmedia.com/applenews/article/art_id/31937962/IssueID/20090913zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 詹炳耀主持(2006)。校園BBS站相關法律問題研究(九十五年教育部補助辦理資訊教育及網路學習推廣活動)。雲林縣:國立雲林科技大學科技法律研究所。擷取自:http://www.edu.tw/moecc/content.aspx?site_content_sn=5285zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 電腦網路內容分級處理辦法(2005)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭光明(2009)。不可說的在言噤聲:藍騰的反色情論證。歐美研究,39(1),169-224。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 釋字第四○七號解釋(1996)。司法院公報,38(8),15-32。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 釋字第六一七號解釋(2007)。司法院公報,49(1),1-75。zh_TW