| dc.contributor.advisor | 何萬順 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Her, One Soon | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (作者) | 謝依庭 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (作者) | Xie, Yi Ting | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 謝依庭 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Xie, Yi Ting | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2009 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 9-十二月-2010 12:34:55 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 9-十二月-2010 12:34:55 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 9-十二月-2010 12:34:55 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) | G0095555013 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49900 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 95555013 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 98 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 範域 (Extent)這個論旨角色在漢語中是個常見卻鮮少被研究的論旨角色 (Halliday, 1964; Teng, 1975; Dowty, 1991; Huang, 1993; Her, 2009)，本研究旨在探討漢語中的範域論旨角色並且為以客體(Theme)，感受者(Experiencer)，以及範域(Extent)三個論旨角色為論元的句子提出合理的解釋，例如 “一本書寫了他三年”此類句子。 本篇論文的第一部份探討漢語中的數量詞(number expression)以及時間詞(duration)並且指出在漢語中他們經常被指派為範域論旨角色(Extent)。接著探討 “一本書寫了他三年”此類句子，並且提出活動動詞(activity verb)以及達成動詞(accomplishment verb)會模仿心理動詞(psych verb)因此產生此類句型，也就是客體(Theme)在主詞位置，而感受者(Experiencer)以及範域(Extent)為受詞。由於動詞 ‘寫’模仿了心理動詞，而且此類句型著重在受詞受到動詞的影響，因此原本的主事者(Agent) ‘他’成為主事者和感受者的複合角色(composite role)，但是只有感受者參與詞彙照映(lexical mapping)。論文最後一部份為“一本書寫了他三年”此類句子進行詞彙照映(lexical mapping)，本篇論文參照Zaenen (1993)的混合解釋方法(mixed account)以及Her (1999, 2003, 2007)的統一映照理論(unified mapping principle)成功的解釋了此類句子的論元體現(argument realization) 。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Extent (Dowty, 1991; Her, 2009) is also referred to as Range (Halliday, 1964; Teng, 1975) or Domain (Huang 1993). It is a less studied yet commonly seen thematic role in Mandarin Chinese. This thesis aims to investigate the thematic role Extent in Mandarin Chinese, and to propose an explanation for the sentence where the verb has three arguments as Theme, Experiencer and Extent, such as yi4ben3 shu1 xie3le5 ta1 san1 nian2 ‘It took him three years to write a book’. In the first part, this thesis explores the thematic role Extent in Mandarin Chinese, and it is proposed that number expression and duration be considered as Extent. Then, the sentences having three arguments such as in the sentence yi4ben3 shu1 xie3le5 ta1 san1 nian2 ‘It took him three years to write a book’ are investigated. It is proposed that activity verb and accomplishment verb model the syntactic behavior of psych verb so that they can have Theme in the subject position and Experiencer and Extent as two complements. Since the activity verb xie3 ‘write’ models the psych verb and the sentence structure focuses on the [affected] feature of the object, the Agent ta1 ‘he’ becomes a composite role of Agent and Experiencer, but only the Experiencer can participate in the lexical mapping. In the last part of the thesis, the lexical mapping of the sentence yi4ben3 shu1 xie3le5 ta1 san1 nian2 ‘It took him three years to write a book’ is demonstrated. This thesis adopts Zaenen’s (1993) mixed account and Her’s (1999, 2003, 2007) unified mapping principle (UMP) to successfully account for the argument realization of the sentence. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements..........................................ivChinese Abstract.........................................viiEnglish Abstract..........................................ixChaper1. Introduction............................................11.1 The thematic role Extent...............................11.2 Motivation and purpose of the thesis...................41.3 Organization of the thesis.............................52. Literature Review.......................................72.1 Extent as a semantic role..............................72.2 Extent as an argument.................................102.2.1 Extent and Patient..................................132.2.2 Extent and Theme....................................193. Extent in Mandarin Chinese.............................233.1 Number expression as Extent...........................233.2 Duration as Extent....................................274. Analogy between Action Verbs and Psychological Verbs...354.1 Verb types of the sentence structure..................354.1.1 Verb classification of Jackson (1990)...............354.1.2 Verb classification of Vendler (1957)...............384.2 Subject NP of the sentence structure..................424.3 Additional meaning with the sentence structure........484.4 Psychological verbs...................................514.4.1 Types of psychological verbs........................514.4.2 Psychological verbs with duration...................554.5 Analogy between action verbs and psych verbs..........615. Proto-roles and Lexical Mapping........................675.1 Lexical functional grammar............................675.1.1 Lexical mapping theory..............................675.1.2 Proto-role approach.................................705.2 A mixed account of LFG and proto-role approach........735.3 Lexical mapping of the psych verbs in Mandarin Chinese775.4 The composite role and lexical mapping................805.5 Causativity and argument realization..................836. Conclusion.............................................87References................................................90 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 414139 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095555013 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 範域論旨角色 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 複合角色 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 心理動詞 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 詞彙映照 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 論元體現 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Extent | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | composite | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | psychological verb | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | lexical mapping | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | argument realization | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 論中文範域論旨角色 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | On the thematic role extent in mandarin Chinese | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ackerman, Farrell, and Moore, John. 2001. Proto-properties and Argument Encoding: a Correspondence Theory of Argument Selection. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Andrews, Avery. 1985. The Major Functions of the Noun Phrase. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. I: Clause Structure, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 62-154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Belletti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi. 1988. Psych-Verbs and Θ-Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 291-352. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bresnan, Joan (ed.). 1982. The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bresnan, Joan and Kanerva, Jonni. 1989. Locative Inversion in Chichewa: A Case Study of Factorization in Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 1-50. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dowty, David. 1988. On the Semantic Content of the Notion “Thematic Roles”. Properties, Types and Meaning. Vol. II: Semantic Issues, ed. by Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara Partee and Raymond Turner, 69-131. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic Proto-roles and Argument Selection. Langue 67(3), 574-619. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Her, One-soon. 1999. Interaction of Thematic Structure and Syntactic Structures: On Mandarin Dative Alternations. Chinese Languages and Linguistics V: Interaction of Form and Function, ed. by Y. Yin et al, 373-412. Academia Sinica. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Her, One-soon. 2003. Chinese Inversion Constructions within a Simplified LMT. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, Monograph Series Number 19: Lexical-functional Grammar Analysis of Chinese, edited by Adams Bodomo and Kang Kwong Luke, 1-31. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Her, One-soon. 2007. Argument-function Mismatches in Mandarin Chinese: A Lexical Mapping Account. Lingua 117(1), 221-246. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Her, One-soon. 2009. Apparent Subject-Object Inversion in Chinese. Linguistics 47(5), 1143-1181. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Huang, Chu-ren. 1993. Mandarin Chinese and the Lexical Mapping Theory: A Study of the Interaction of Morphology and Argument Changing. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 62(2), 337-388. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Huang, C.-T. J., Li, Y.-H. A., and Li, Y. 2009. The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Massachusetts: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structure. Massachusetts: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jackson, Howard. 1990. Grammar and Meaning: A Semantic Approach to English Grammar. New York: Longman. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kelling, Carmen. 2003. French Psych Verbs and Derived Nouns. Nominals: Inside and Out, ed. by Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, 151-179. Leland Stanford Junior University: CSLI Publications. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kim, Young-joo, and Richard Larson. 1989. Scope Interpretation and the Syntax of Psych-Verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 681-688. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Landau, Idan. 2009. The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Massachusetts: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Li, Yafei. 1995. The Thematic Hierarchy and Causativity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13, 255-282. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1990. Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1998. Argument Determiner Phrases and Number Phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 29(4), 693-702. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lin, Jimmy. 2004. Event Structure and the Encoding of Arguments: The Syntax of the Mandarin and English Verb Phrase. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Liu, Meichun. 2010. Emotion in Lexicon and Grammar: Lexical-constructional Interface of Mandarin Emotional Predicates. Paper presented at the workshop of the Institute of Linguistics at National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan, 8 April. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Massachusetts: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sybesma, Rint. 1999. The Mandarin VP. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tenny, Carol. 1998. Psych Verbs and Verbal Passives in Pittsburghese. Linguistics 36(3), 591-597. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Teng, Shou-hsin. 1975. A Semantic Study of Transitivity Relations in Chinese. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and Times. The Philosophical Review 66(2), 143-160. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Van Voorst, Jan. 1992. The Aspectual Semantics of Psychological Verbs. Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 65-92. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wu, Xiu-zhi. 1993. Psychological Predicates in Chinese. MA Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zaenen, Annie. 1993. Unaccusativity in Dutch: Integrating syntax and lexical semantics. Semantics and the Lexicon, ed. by James Pustejovsky, 129-161. Dordrecht: Kluwer. | zh_TW |
