Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 台灣產業就業結構中去工業化因素之探討
Examination on factors of de-industrialization in Taiwan`s employment structure
作者 蔡濟安
Tsai, Chi An
貢獻者 吳德美
Wu, Te Mei
蔡濟安
Tsai, Chi An
關鍵詞 去工業化
中國大陸
經濟發展
景氣循環
全球化
De-industrialization
China
Economic Development
Business Cycle
Globalizaiton
日期 2009
上傳時間 9-Dec-2010 16:20:15 (UTC+8)
摘要 自1987年以來,台灣製造業就業比例開始大幅下降。這樣的情形,一般又稱為「去工業化」,引起了很多的討論與擔憂。許多人把台灣的「去工業化」歸咎於對中國大陸的投資與貿易。然而本文發現,台灣早在1996年之後便停止「去工業化」。如此現象迥異於一般已開發國家的情形,因此本文研究目的即在於探討台灣為何發生「去工業化」以及為何停止。本文首先將製造業分為「三階段、三類別」,並比較台灣經貿之發展,進行對照分析,發現:台灣傳統產業受到全球化因素影響造成勞動需求萎縮,導致台灣1987年與1996年之間出現「去工業化」;然自1997年開始,技術密集產業之勞動需求隨著對外投資與貿易增加而成長,使得台灣停止「去工業化」;其次本文依照「Rowthorn 模型」,先將製造業就業比例分為傳統產業與非傳統產業,再將造成「去工業化」的因素分為三類:經濟發展、全球化、景氣循環,並以實證分析檢驗台灣案例後發現:景氣差、失業率高對於傳統與非傳統產業的就業比例都有負向影響,但經濟發展與全球化因素對於傳統產業就業有顯著的負向影響,對非傳統產業則有顯著正向影響,促使傳統產業釋放出來的勞動力被非傳統產業所吸收,因此台灣的製造業整體就業比例得以維持在27%左右,並未如西方國家般持續得「去工業化」。
Since 1987, the manufacturing employment rate in Taiwan had dropped dramatically for almost 10%. This situation, so called de-industrialization, has drown much attention and at many times been attributed to the expanding investment and trade with China. However, the trend of de-industrialization in Taiwan, unlike cases in other developed countries, has been stopped since 1996. The aim of this article is to find out why de-industrialization had once taken place in Taiwan and why it then got stopped. Firstly, we employed the correlation analysis on the data categorized as “three sectors and three phases”. Results indicated the negative impact of outward investment and trade with China on conventional industries and positive impact on non-conventional ones. Secondly, based on the “Rowthorn Model”, we used regression analysis to examine whether economic development, globalization, or busyness cycle will affect the employment rate of conventional and non-conventional industries. We found out that both economic development and globalization factors had caused the decrease of labor demand in conventional industries and the increase in non-conventional industries. The declining of conventional industries was the cause of de-industrialization after 1987, while the non-conventional industries, not the service industries, keep absorbing labors from conventional ones and therefore stopped the trend of de-industrialization after 1996.
參考文獻 吳惠林,1997,〈海外投資與產業空洞化〉。《輸出入金融雙月刊》73:2–6。
周玉珊,2002,〈對外投資對產業空洞化之影響—以台灣製造業為例〉。台北:國立台灣大學經濟學研究所 碩士論文。
周欣儀,2004,〈對外投資對「產業結構」與「勞動結構」調整之影響〉。台北:國立台灣大學國家發展研究所 碩士論文。
周添城、吳惠林,1990,〈台灣產業空洞化問題的省思與檢討〉。《經濟前瞻》20:33–35。
周添城、吳惠林,1990,〈台灣產業結構轉變與產業空洞化〉。《自由中國之工業》74 (4) :11–25。
林五郎,2003,〈台灣「產業空洞化」問題之再探討〉。《台灣經濟論衡》1 (10) :19–41。
林怡君,2006,〈投資中國與產業空洞化間的思辨與拉鋸〉。《台灣經濟研究月刊》29 (9) :82–90。
林照雄,2001,〈台灣企業對外直接投資與產業空洞化〉。《銘傳學刊》11:81–106。
高長,2001,〈製造業赴大陸投資經營當地化及其對台灣經濟之影響〉。《經濟情勢暨評論季刊》7 (1) :138–173。
高長,2009,《大陸經改與兩岸貿易》。台北:五南。
梁榮輝、廖振盛,2004,〈產業西進與產業空洞化〉。《企銀季刊》27 (1) :143–153。
陳旭昇,2009,《時間序列分析》。台北:台灣東華。
陳志坪,2009,〈日本の對外直接投資と產業空洞化〉。《高科大應用外語學報》11:109–133。
陳忠榮、楊志海,1999,〈台灣對外直接投資的決定因素 ––– 擴張型與防禦型的比較〉。《經濟論文叢刊》27 (2) :215–240。
陳添枝,1988,〈台灣會發生產業空洞化嗎?〉。《中國論壇》26 (5) :78–80。
楊小凱,1994,〈「組織創新』的新經濟理論與台灣的「產業空洞化」〉。《經濟前瞻》33:179–183。
劉碧珍、林惠玲,〈對外投資與回銷決策—台灣製造業之驗證〉。《經濟論文叢刊》29 (4) :479–510。
蔡宏明,2006,〈1986年以來兩岸傳統產業的合作與發展〉。收錄於高希均、李誠、林祖嘉主編,《兩岸經濟二十年:1986年以來兩岸經濟合作與發展》。台北:天下。
蔡宏明、林美霞,1994,〈我國產業空洞化問題之研究〉。《今日經濟》16–22。
謝寬裕,1999,〈台灣產業外移與產業空洞化之檢驗〉。《台灣經濟金融月刊》35 (8) :46–65。
蘇顯揚,1988,〈日本的海外投資與產業空洞化的隱憂〉。《經濟前瞻》10:115–119。
Alderson, Arthur S., 1997, “ Globalization and De–industrialization: Direct Investment and the Decline of Manufacturing Employment in 17 OECD Nations”, Journal of World–Systems Research 3: 1–34.
Baumol, William, Blackman, Sue, and Wolff, Edward, 1985, “Unbalanced Growth Revisted: Asymptotic Stagnancy and New Evidence”, the American Economic Review 75 (4) : 806–817.
Baumol, William, Blackman, Sue, and Wolff, Edward, 1989, Productivity and American Leadership, London, the MIT Press.
Bluestone, Barry, 1977, “Is De–industrialization a Myth? Capital Mobility versus Absorptive Capacity in the U.S. Economy”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 475: 39–51.
Boulhol, Herve` and Fontage`, Lionel, 2006, “De–industrialization and the Fear of Relocations in the Industry”, CEPII Working Paper.
Brady, David and Denniston, Ryan, 2006, “Economic Globalization, Industrialization and De–industrialization in Affluent Democracies”, Social Forces 85: 297–330.
Colin, Clark, 1957, The Conditions of Economic Progress, London: Macmillan.
Dasgupta, Sukti and Singh, Ajit, 2006, “Manufacturing, Services and Premature De–industrialization in Developing Countries: A Kaldorian Empirical Analysis”, Center for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Working Paper.
Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, 2002, Annual Review of Development in Globalization and Regional Integration in the Countries of the ESCWA Region, New York: United Nations.
Ietto–Gillies, Grazia, 1992, International Production: Trends, Theories, Effects, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kucera, David and Milberg, William, 2003, “De–industrialization and Changes in Manufacturing Trade: Factor Content Calculations for 1978–1995”, Review of World Economy 139 (4) : 601–624.
Michiewicz, T and Zalewska, A., 2005, “De–industrialization—Rowthorn and Wells’ Model Revisted”, Acta Oeconomica 56 (2) : 143–166.
Rowthorn, Robert and Coutts, Ken, 2004, “De–industrialization and the Balance of Payments in Advanced Economies”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 28: 767–790.
Rowthorn, Robert and Ramaswamy, Ramana, 1997, “De–industrialization: Causes and Implications”, IMF Working Paper.
Rowthorn, Robert and Ramaswamy, Ramana, 1999, “Growth, Trade, and De–industrialization”, IMF Staff Paper 46 (1) : 18–41.
Rowthorn, Robert and Wells, J.R., 1987, De–industrialization and Foreign Trade, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saeger, Steven S., 1997, “Globalization and De–industrialization: Myth and Reality in the OECD”, Review of World Economy 133 (4) : 579–607.
Singh, Ajit, 1977, “UK Industry and the World Economy: a case of de–industrialization”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 1 (2) : 113–136.
Stopher, J.M. and L. Turner, 1985, Britain and the Multinationals, Chichester: Wiley.
Thirlwall, A.P., 1982, “De–industrialization in the UK”, Lloyds Bank Review 134: 22–37.
Wolf, Martin, 2005, Why Globalization Works, London: Yale University Press.
Wolf, Martin, 2009, Fixing Global Finance: How to Curb Financial Crises in the 21st Century, New Haven: Yale University Press.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國家發展研究所
96261010
98
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0962610101
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳德美zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Wu, Te Meien_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蔡濟安zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Tsai, Chi Anen_US
dc.creator (作者) 蔡濟安zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Tsai, Chi Anen_US
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 9-Dec-2010 16:20:15 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 9-Dec-2010 16:20:15 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-Dec-2010 16:20:15 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0962610101en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50019-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國家發展研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96261010zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 自1987年以來,台灣製造業就業比例開始大幅下降。這樣的情形,一般又稱為「去工業化」,引起了很多的討論與擔憂。許多人把台灣的「去工業化」歸咎於對中國大陸的投資與貿易。然而本文發現,台灣早在1996年之後便停止「去工業化」。如此現象迥異於一般已開發國家的情形,因此本文研究目的即在於探討台灣為何發生「去工業化」以及為何停止。本文首先將製造業分為「三階段、三類別」,並比較台灣經貿之發展,進行對照分析,發現:台灣傳統產業受到全球化因素影響造成勞動需求萎縮,導致台灣1987年與1996年之間出現「去工業化」;然自1997年開始,技術密集產業之勞動需求隨著對外投資與貿易增加而成長,使得台灣停止「去工業化」;其次本文依照「Rowthorn 模型」,先將製造業就業比例分為傳統產業與非傳統產業,再將造成「去工業化」的因素分為三類:經濟發展、全球化、景氣循環,並以實證分析檢驗台灣案例後發現:景氣差、失業率高對於傳統與非傳統產業的就業比例都有負向影響,但經濟發展與全球化因素對於傳統產業就業有顯著的負向影響,對非傳統產業則有顯著正向影響,促使傳統產業釋放出來的勞動力被非傳統產業所吸收,因此台灣的製造業整體就業比例得以維持在27%左右,並未如西方國家般持續得「去工業化」。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Since 1987, the manufacturing employment rate in Taiwan had dropped dramatically for almost 10%. This situation, so called de-industrialization, has drown much attention and at many times been attributed to the expanding investment and trade with China. However, the trend of de-industrialization in Taiwan, unlike cases in other developed countries, has been stopped since 1996. The aim of this article is to find out why de-industrialization had once taken place in Taiwan and why it then got stopped. Firstly, we employed the correlation analysis on the data categorized as “three sectors and three phases”. Results indicated the negative impact of outward investment and trade with China on conventional industries and positive impact on non-conventional ones. Secondly, based on the “Rowthorn Model”, we used regression analysis to examine whether economic development, globalization, or busyness cycle will affect the employment rate of conventional and non-conventional industries. We found out that both economic development and globalization factors had caused the decrease of labor demand in conventional industries and the increase in non-conventional industries. The declining of conventional industries was the cause of de-industrialization after 1987, while the non-conventional industries, not the service industries, keep absorbing labors from conventional ones and therefore stopped the trend of de-industrialization after 1996.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 謝詞.......................................................1
英文摘要....................................................3
中文摘要...................................................4
目次.......................................................5
圖次......................................................6
表次.......................................................8
第一章 緒論...............................................9
第一節 研究目的.........................................18
第二節 文章架構.........................................19
第二章 文獻回顧.........................................20
第一節 「De-industrialization」的研究起源...............20
第二節 全球化因素.......................................21
第三節 經濟發展因素.....................................24
第四節 景氣循環因素.....................................26
第五節 對「Rowthorn模型」的批評..........................27
第六節 台灣去工業化的研究................................28
第三章 研究設計.........................................30
第一節 研究範圍與研究方法................................30
第二節 模型建立與比較....................................31
第三節 假設提出與統計方法................................35
第四節 實證資料來源與變數選取.............................37
第四章 投資、貿易與台灣製造業就業的長期趨勢................42
第一節 台灣對外投資與製造業勞動就業之關係..................43
第二節 台灣對外貿易與製造業勞動就業之關係..................49
第三節 對中國大陸投資與貿易對台灣製造業勞動就業之影響........54
第四節 綜合比較.........................................58
第五章 實證分析與實證結果................................62
第六章 結論與建議.......................................70
第一節 研究發現.........................................70
第二節 研究限制.........................................72
參考文獻.................................................74
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 2078330 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0962610101en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 去工業化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中國大陸zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 經濟發展zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 景氣循環zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 全球化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) De-industrializationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Chinaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Economic Developmenten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Business Cycleen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Globalizaitonen_US
dc.title (題名) 台灣產業就業結構中去工業化因素之探討zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Examination on factors of de-industrialization in Taiwan`s employment structureen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳惠林,1997,〈海外投資與產業空洞化〉。《輸出入金融雙月刊》73:2–6。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周玉珊,2002,〈對外投資對產業空洞化之影響—以台灣製造業為例〉。台北:國立台灣大學經濟學研究所 碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周欣儀,2004,〈對外投資對「產業結構」與「勞動結構」調整之影響〉。台北:國立台灣大學國家發展研究所 碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周添城、吳惠林,1990,〈台灣產業空洞化問題的省思與檢討〉。《經濟前瞻》20:33–35。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周添城、吳惠林,1990,〈台灣產業結構轉變與產業空洞化〉。《自由中國之工業》74 (4) :11–25。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林五郎,2003,〈台灣「產業空洞化」問題之再探討〉。《台灣經濟論衡》1 (10) :19–41。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林怡君,2006,〈投資中國與產業空洞化間的思辨與拉鋸〉。《台灣經濟研究月刊》29 (9) :82–90。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林照雄,2001,〈台灣企業對外直接投資與產業空洞化〉。《銘傳學刊》11:81–106。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高長,2001,〈製造業赴大陸投資經營當地化及其對台灣經濟之影響〉。《經濟情勢暨評論季刊》7 (1) :138–173。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高長,2009,《大陸經改與兩岸貿易》。台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梁榮輝、廖振盛,2004,〈產業西進與產業空洞化〉。《企銀季刊》27 (1) :143–153。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳旭昇,2009,《時間序列分析》。台北:台灣東華。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳志坪,2009,〈日本の對外直接投資と產業空洞化〉。《高科大應用外語學報》11:109–133。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳忠榮、楊志海,1999,〈台灣對外直接投資的決定因素 ––– 擴張型與防禦型的比較〉。《經濟論文叢刊》27 (2) :215–240。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳添枝,1988,〈台灣會發生產業空洞化嗎?〉。《中國論壇》26 (5) :78–80。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊小凱,1994,〈「組織創新』的新經濟理論與台灣的「產業空洞化」〉。《經濟前瞻》33:179–183。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉碧珍、林惠玲,〈對外投資與回銷決策—台灣製造業之驗證〉。《經濟論文叢刊》29 (4) :479–510。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡宏明,2006,〈1986年以來兩岸傳統產業的合作與發展〉。收錄於高希均、李誠、林祖嘉主編,《兩岸經濟二十年:1986年以來兩岸經濟合作與發展》。台北:天下。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡宏明、林美霞,1994,〈我國產業空洞化問題之研究〉。《今日經濟》16–22。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝寬裕,1999,〈台灣產業外移與產業空洞化之檢驗〉。《台灣經濟金融月刊》35 (8) :46–65。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇顯揚,1988,〈日本的海外投資與產業空洞化的隱憂〉。《經濟前瞻》10:115–119。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alderson, Arthur S., 1997, “ Globalization and De–industrialization: Direct Investment and the Decline of Manufacturing Employment in 17 OECD Nations”, Journal of World–Systems Research 3: 1–34.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baumol, William, Blackman, Sue, and Wolff, Edward, 1985, “Unbalanced Growth Revisted: Asymptotic Stagnancy and New Evidence”, the American Economic Review 75 (4) : 806–817.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baumol, William, Blackman, Sue, and Wolff, Edward, 1989, Productivity and American Leadership, London, the MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bluestone, Barry, 1977, “Is De–industrialization a Myth? Capital Mobility versus Absorptive Capacity in the U.S. Economy”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 475: 39–51.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Boulhol, Herve` and Fontage`, Lionel, 2006, “De–industrialization and the Fear of Relocations in the Industry”, CEPII Working Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brady, David and Denniston, Ryan, 2006, “Economic Globalization, Industrialization and De–industrialization in Affluent Democracies”, Social Forces 85: 297–330.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Colin, Clark, 1957, The Conditions of Economic Progress, London: Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dasgupta, Sukti and Singh, Ajit, 2006, “Manufacturing, Services and Premature De–industrialization in Developing Countries: A Kaldorian Empirical Analysis”, Center for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Working Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, 2002, Annual Review of Development in Globalization and Regional Integration in the Countries of the ESCWA Region, New York: United Nations.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ietto–Gillies, Grazia, 1992, International Production: Trends, Theories, Effects, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kucera, David and Milberg, William, 2003, “De–industrialization and Changes in Manufacturing Trade: Factor Content Calculations for 1978–1995”, Review of World Economy 139 (4) : 601–624.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Michiewicz, T and Zalewska, A., 2005, “De–industrialization—Rowthorn and Wells’ Model Revisted”, Acta Oeconomica 56 (2) : 143–166.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rowthorn, Robert and Coutts, Ken, 2004, “De–industrialization and the Balance of Payments in Advanced Economies”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 28: 767–790.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rowthorn, Robert and Ramaswamy, Ramana, 1997, “De–industrialization: Causes and Implications”, IMF Working Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rowthorn, Robert and Ramaswamy, Ramana, 1999, “Growth, Trade, and De–industrialization”, IMF Staff Paper 46 (1) : 18–41.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rowthorn, Robert and Wells, J.R., 1987, De–industrialization and Foreign Trade, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Saeger, Steven S., 1997, “Globalization and De–industrialization: Myth and Reality in the OECD”, Review of World Economy 133 (4) : 579–607.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Singh, Ajit, 1977, “UK Industry and the World Economy: a case of de–industrialization”, Cambridge Journal of Economics 1 (2) : 113–136.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stopher, J.M. and L. Turner, 1985, Britain and the Multinationals, Chichester: Wiley.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thirlwall, A.P., 1982, “De–industrialization in the UK”, Lloyds Bank Review 134: 22–37.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wolf, Martin, 2005, Why Globalization Works, London: Yale University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wolf, Martin, 2009, Fixing Global Finance: How to Curb Financial Crises in the 21st Century, New Haven: Yale University Press.zh_TW