學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 製造業廠商推動服務化之研究--核心能耐的觀點
Servitization of manufacturing firms: the perspective of core competence
作者 粘旭良
貢獻者 吳豐祥
粘旭良
關鍵詞 製造業服務化
服務創新
核心能耐
日期 2010
上傳時間 29-Sep-2011 16:41:14 (UTC+8)
摘要 在全球邁入服務經濟時代的發展趨勢下,服務創新成為產業新興的熱門課題。過去以製造業為主體的台灣企業,也意識到產值和毛利不斷被壓縮,以及製造業和服務業的界線日趨模糊的現象。為了獲取長久的競爭優勢,不少製造業者已體認到,過去在成本、技術與品質上的領先已無法提高產業附加價值,因此必須向價值鏈兩端延伸,利用創新服務來為產品增加附加價值,而這也成為現今製造業的致勝關鍵。
     過去文獻對於服務創新的議題已有不少研究,主要是在探討企業發展創新服務的過程與策略考量,或是研究服務創新的發展模式,抑或是服務創新專案。此外, 關於製造業推動服務化方面,只有少數在探討產業轉型及經營策略與模式,但更少有探討製造業服務化發展內涵之個案研究。因此本研究利用深入訪談的個案研究法,針對推動服務化發展的製造業廠商,探討其服務創新概念如何產生與服務創新的內涵,並輔以核心能耐的觀點,來探討製造業服務化專案的推動與組織核心能耐建構之關係,以提供未來有意推動服務化發展的台灣製造業廠商作為參考。
     本研究的結論如下:
     1.製造業廠商在和客戶接觸的過程中,會根據本身對內外部環境背景知識的了解,「主動」創造客戶的需求,提供差異化的加值服務,並建立與客戶間的夥伴關係。
     2.製造業廠商推動服務化時,在服務範疇上會考慮往供應鏈上下游延伸,以及發揮本身的優勢功能;在作法上則會以提供客戶「一次購足」與「完整解決方案」的服務為主。
     3.製造業廠商在推動服務化的發展方案時,會進行跨部門的組織運作,並且透過教育訓練和跨域合作的方式,培養員工新的專業知識與技能。
     4.製造業廠商推動服務化時,若本身的事業知識越豐富,則越能洞悉產業的發展趨勢,此外,若是其擁有更完整的市場知識,則有助於提出創新的服務概念。
     5.製造業廠商推動服務化時,不管是創造新的實體系統,或就原有的實體系統進行整合與建構,都會強調資通訊科技的輔助效果。而企業對於技術知識的掌握度越高,則越有助於服務創新的發展。
     6.製造業廠商推動服務化時,會以「創新」作為組織新的價值觀與企業文化。
     
     關鍵字:製造業服務化、服務創新、核心能耐
In the trend of global development of service economy, service innovation has become an emerging hot topic of industries. Taiwanese companies, the main part of which are manufacturing industries in the past, also realize the phenomenon that the income and gross margin are deceasing, and the difference between manufacturing and service industries has become blurred. In order to gain long-term competitive advantages, some manufacturing firms has noticed that being in the lead of cost, skill and quality during the past is unable to enhance the value-added of industries. Therefore, they think it is a must to extend their activities to both ends of the value chain, and then to gain value-added on products by using service. However, this has become the key to success for present-day manufacturing industry.
      In the past, most researches related to service innovation mainly focus on the process and strategic level of innovative service development, the developing model of service innovation, or projects on service innovation. Besides, regarding the servitization of manufacturing firms, only a small number of studies focus on investigating the transformation of industry and operational strategy and models, but there are fewer case studies on servicizing development of manufacturing industry. Therefore, this study focuses on the intension of service innovation of servicizing manufacturing firms by means of thorough interview and case study. Besides, this study is auxiliary by the perspective of core competence to explore the relationship between servitization of manufacturing firms and the construction of organizational core competence, and aims to provide a reference for Taiwanese manufacturing firms which purpose to develop servitization in the future.
     The preliminary research findings include:
     1.Manufacturing firms will “positively” create customers’ need during contact with customers in terms of their background knowledge of internal and external environments, provide differential value-added service, and develop partnership with customers.
     2.Manufacturing firms will consider extending their service to the up- and down-stream of supply chain, or bring their superior function into service development when driving the development of servitization. And the way they do is to provide their customers with service of “One-stop Shopping” and “Total Solution” via front- and back-end systems and service providers.
     3.Manufacturing firms will proceed on trans-departmental organizational operation when driving the development of servitization. And they train their employees to have professional knowledge and skills through educational training and interdisciplinary collaboration to drive the service innovation.
     4.The more industrial knowledge the manufacturing firms have, the more insights into the industrial trend they have. Besides, it will be help to bring up ideas about innovative service if companies know well about their markets.
     5.When manufacturing firms drive the servitization, no matter what to create a new physical system or integrate the original physical systems to a new one, the auxiliary effect of ICT is emphasized. And the more technical knowledge they have, the more chances of innovative service development they will find.
     6.“Innovation” is regarded as a new value and enterprise culture when manufacturing firms drive the development of servitization.
     
     Keywords: Servitization of Manufacturing, Service Innovation, Core Competence
第一章 緒論 1
     第一節 研究背景與動機 1
     第二節 研究目的與問題 3
     第二章 文獻探討 5
     第一節 製造業服務化 5
     一、製造業服務化現象 5
     二、製造業服務化趨勢與內涵 6
     三、製造業服務化可能的發展方向 9
     第二節 服務 12
     一、服務的定義 12
     二、服務的特性 12
     第三節 服務創新 15
     一、服務創新的定義 15
     二、服務創新模型 16
     第四節 核心能耐 23
     一、核心能耐的定義 23
     二、核心能耐的內涵 26
     三、核心能耐的建構 28
     第五節 本章小結 30
     第三章 研究方法 33
     第一節 研究流程 33
     第二節 研究架構 34
     第三節 研究變數定義 35
     一、服務創新構面 35
     二、核心能耐構面 35
     第四節 研究設計 36
     一、研究方法 36
     二、資料蒐集 36
     三、研究限制 38
     第四章 個案分析 41
     第一節 台灣積體電路公司個案 42
     一、公司簡介 42
     二、個案背景介紹 46
     三、服務創新內涵 47
     四、服務創新隱含的知識基礎 55
     五、核心能耐內涵 57
     第二節 裕隆汽車個案 61
     一、公司簡介 61
     二、個案背景介紹 65
     三、服務創新內涵 66
     四、服務創新隱含的知識基礎 72
     五、核心能耐內涵 74
     第三節 帝寶工業個案 79
     一、公司簡介 79
     二、個案背景介紹 83
     三、服務創新內涵 83
     四、服務創新隱含的知識基礎 88
     五、核心能耐內涵 90
     第四節 個案彙整 92
     第五章 研究發現與討論 97
     第一節 製造業廠商推動服務創新的動機與內涵 97
     第二節 製造業廠商推動服務創新的知識基礎 103
     第三節 製造業服務化與組織核心能耐之關係 108
     第六章 研究結論與建議 111
     第一節 研究結論 111
     第二節 研究建議 114
     一、實務上的建議 114
     二、後續研究建議 115
     參考文獻 117
     附錄 122
參考文獻 一、英文文獻
1.Aaker, D. A. (1989), “Managing Assets and Skills: The Key to Sustainable Competitive. Advantage.” California Management Review, 31(2): 91-106.
2.Baines, T. et al. (2007), “State-of-the-Art in Product Service Systems”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture.
3.Bitran, G., and L. Pedrosa (1998), “Structural Product Development Perspective for Service Operations.” European Management Journal, 16(2): 169-189.
4.Booz, Allen and Hamilton (1982), New Product Management for the 1980s. Booz, Allen & Hamilton Inc., New York, NY.
5.Chandler, A.D., Jr. (1962), Strategy and Structure: Concepts in the History of the Industrial Enterprise, MIT Press, Casender.
6.Cohen, Morris, Carl Cull, Hau Lee and Don Willen (2000), “Saturn’s Supply-Chain Innovation: High Value in After-Sales Service”, Sloan Management Review, 93-101.
7.Davies, A. (2003), "Are Firms Moving ‘Downstream’ into High-Value Services?" Service Innovation, Series on Technology Management, 9: 21-34.
8.Froehle, C.M., Roth, A.V., Chase, R.B. and Voss, C.A. (2000), “Antecedents of New Service Development Effectiveness: An Exploratory Examination of Strategic Operations Choices.” Journal of Service Research, 3(1), August: Sage Publications, Inc.
9.Grant, R.M. (1991), “The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation.” California Management Review, 33(3), Spring: 114-135.
10.Gustafsson, A. and Johnson, D. (2003), Competing In A Service Economy: How To Create A Competitive Advantage Through Service Development And Innovation, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 25-28, 119.
11.Hall, R. (1992). “The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resource”, Strategic Management Journal, 13(2): 135-144.
12.Hertog, P. den, Bilderbeek, R. (1998). “Conceptualizing (Service) Innovation and the Knowledge Flows between KIBS and Their Client.” TNO/Dialogic-SI4S-report no.8, Apeldoorn/Utrecht.
13.Hertog, P. den, Bilderbeek, R. (1999). “Conceptualizing Service Innovation and Service Innovation Patterns.” Paper in the framework of the SIID Project, Dialogic, Utrecht.
14.Hill, Charles W.L. and Jones G.R. (1998), Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
15.Homburg, C., Garbe, B. (1999), "Towards an Improved Understanding of Industrial Services: Quality Dimensions and their Impact on Buyer-Seller Relationships", Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 6(2): 39-71.
16.Javidan, M. (1998), “Core Competence: What Does It Mean in Practice?” Long Range Planning, 31(1): 60-71.
17.Kalliokoski Petri, Göran Andersson, Vesa Salminen and Jukka Hemilä (2003), “BestServ Feasibility Study”, Technology Industries of Finland, Helsinki.
18.Kotler, P. (1991), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19.Leonard-Barton, D. (1992), “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development.” Strategic Management Journal, 13: 111-125.
20.Leonard-Barton, D. (1995), Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
21.Neely, Andy (2007), “The Servitization of Manufacturing: an Analysis of Global Trends”. To be presented at the 14th European Operations Management Association Conference, Ankara, Turkey.
22.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1985), “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research.” Journal of Marketing 49, Fall: 41-50.
23.Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel G. (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation.” Harvard Business Review, May-June: 79-91.
24.Ren, G. and Gregory, M.J. (2007), “Servitization in Manufacturing Companies: a Conceptualization, Critical Review and Research Agenda.” in 2007 Frontiers in Service Conference. San Francisco, CA, USA.
25.Shostack, L. (1997), “Breaking Free from Product Marketing.” Journal of Marketing, 41, April: 73-80.
26.Toffel, Michael W. (2008), “Contracting for Servicizing”, Harvard Business School Working Paper, No.08-063.
27.Vandermerwe, S. and Rada, J. (1988), “Servitization of Business: Adding Value by Adding Services.” European Management Journal, 6(4).
28.Voss, C.A. (1992), “Measurement of Innovation and Design Performance in Services.” Design Management Journal, Winter: 40-46.
29.White, Allen L., Stoughton, M. and Feng, L. (1999), “Servicizing: The Quiet Transition to Extended Product Responsibility”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste.
30.Windrum, P. and Tomlinson, M. (1999), “Knowledge-intensive Services and International Competitiveness: a Four Country Comparison.” Research Memoranda 023, Maastricht: MERIT, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.
31.Wise, R. and Baumgartner, P. (1999), “Go Downstream: The New Profit Imperative in Manufacturing.” Harvard Business Review, 77(5): 133-141.
32.Yin, R.K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
二、中文文獻
1.工研院 (2010),製造服務化趨勢下之產業人才發展策略,經濟部技術處。
2.中華經濟研究院執行 (2007),經濟部96年度服務業發展情勢年報—商業服務業,經濟部商業司編印。
3.台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司 (2010),民國九十八年度年報(一)。
4.司徒達賢、林晉寬 (1995),「資源基礎理論與企業競爭優勢關係」,八十四年度國家科學委員會管理學門專題計畫研究成果發表論文集。
5.古永嘉 (1996),企業研究方法,台北:華泰。譯自Cooper, D.R. & Emony, W. (1995), Business Research Methods。
6.伍忠賢 (2006),透視台積電,台北:五南圖書。
7.池惠婷等 (2008),製造業新價值~衍生商業服務契機,工研院產經中心、資策會市場中心出版。
8.金聯舫、丘宏昌 (2009),「台灣半導體業縱覽與台積電的經營、台積電的發展與服務的關係」,服務科學入門10講,頁23-44,台北:智勝文化。
9.李元墩、吳濟民 (2004),「知識管理策略、組織核心能耐與經營績效之關係-以台灣生物科技產業為實證」,科技管理學刊,第九卷第二期,頁103-129。
10.周雍強、鍾顯榮 (2009),「專業製造之產能服務能耐的競爭理論」,管理與系統,第十六卷第一期,頁53-74。
11.林玉惠 (2008),「製造業轉型為服務導向企業之研究:以服務科學的觀點」,國立中興大學科技管理研究所。
12.林盈志 (2008),「企業推動服務創新專案之研究—以「卓越服務獎」得獎企業為例」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
13.吳思華 (2000),策略九說,臉譜文化。
14.吳豐祥 (2004),「企業的核心能耐」,經濟日報,2004/05/29。
15.施振榮 (1996),再造宏碁:開創、成長與挑戰,天下遠見出版。
16.帝寶工業股份有限公司 (2010),九十八年度年報。
17.徐作聖等 (2007),科技服務業發展策略及應用—以RFID為例,新竹:交大出版社。
18.郭建良 (2008),產業觀點下的服務創新方法論V1.0,工研院產經中心、資策會市場中心出版。
19.高佑嘉、賴怡叡 (2009),製造業服務化與資訊應用調查報告,經濟部技術處。
20.陳嵩 (2004),「新金融產品開發活動之執行品質與績效—台灣銀行業與保險業之研究」,台大管理論叢,第十四卷,第二期,頁49-78。
21.陳東升 (2003),積體網路:臺灣高科技產業的社會學分析,台北:群學。
22.陳信宏 (2008),「台灣製造服務化的可能模式:借鏡芬蘭的政策觀點」,國際經濟情勢雙週報,1667期,中華經濟研究院。
23.陳炳宏 (2008),「金融服務業服務創新專案與組織核心能耐關係之研究—以中國信託商業銀行為例」,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
24.陳國榮 (2003),「台灣汽車產業價值鏈的趨勢探討」,國立交通大學管理學院高階主管管理學程碩士論文。
25.陳萬淇 (1985),個案研究法,台北:華泰。
26.張劭勳 (2001),研究方法,滄海出版社,頁303-304。
27.曾鳳秋 (2009),「飯店產業服務創新專案開發模式-以日月潭雲品酒店為例」,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
28.黃楹均、郭怡君 (2008),台灣服務業中長期發展關鍵與策略,工研院產經中心、資策會市場中心出版。
29.葉仲斌 (2007),「晶圓代工產業服務價值傳遞與服務創新之研究」,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
30.裘以嘉 (2009),「從製造到服務之轉型探討-以華碩、台積電及巨大機械為例」,國立交通大學管理學院高階主管管理碩士學程論文。
31.裕隆汽車股份有限公司 (2010),九十八年度年報。
32.顏淑馨 (2004),競爭大未來,智庫文化出版。譯自Gary Hamel &C.K. Prahalad (1994),Competing For The Future。
三、網路資源
1.裕隆汽車網站 http://www.yulon-motor.com.tw/
2.裕隆企業集團網站 http://www.yulongroup.com.tw/
3.台積電網站 http://www.tsmc.com/
4.帝寶工業網站 http://www.depoautolamp.com/
5.公開資訊觀測站 http://mops.twse.com.tw/
6.IC Insights http://www.icinsights.com/
7.sriiAP服務創新知識庫 http://www.sriiap.org/
8.全球運籌管理—個案探討「台積電」 http://tinyurl.com/36pje93
9.「後ECFA時代的產業政策」,陸資來台服務網 http://iitw.cnfi.org.tw/
10.經濟部—人才快訊:我國製造業服務化趨勢下人才發展問題之探討 http://itriexpress.blogspot.com/2010/12/blog-post_06.html
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理研究所
97359009
99
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097359009
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳豐祥zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 粘旭良zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 粘旭良zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 29-Sep-2011 16:41:14 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 29-Sep-2011 16:41:14 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-Sep-2011 16:41:14 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0097359009en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50800-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 科技管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97359009zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 在全球邁入服務經濟時代的發展趨勢下,服務創新成為產業新興的熱門課題。過去以製造業為主體的台灣企業,也意識到產值和毛利不斷被壓縮,以及製造業和服務業的界線日趨模糊的現象。為了獲取長久的競爭優勢,不少製造業者已體認到,過去在成本、技術與品質上的領先已無法提高產業附加價值,因此必須向價值鏈兩端延伸,利用創新服務來為產品增加附加價值,而這也成為現今製造業的致勝關鍵。
     過去文獻對於服務創新的議題已有不少研究,主要是在探討企業發展創新服務的過程與策略考量,或是研究服務創新的發展模式,抑或是服務創新專案。此外, 關於製造業推動服務化方面,只有少數在探討產業轉型及經營策略與模式,但更少有探討製造業服務化發展內涵之個案研究。因此本研究利用深入訪談的個案研究法,針對推動服務化發展的製造業廠商,探討其服務創新概念如何產生與服務創新的內涵,並輔以核心能耐的觀點,來探討製造業服務化專案的推動與組織核心能耐建構之關係,以提供未來有意推動服務化發展的台灣製造業廠商作為參考。
     本研究的結論如下:
     1.製造業廠商在和客戶接觸的過程中,會根據本身對內外部環境背景知識的了解,「主動」創造客戶的需求,提供差異化的加值服務,並建立與客戶間的夥伴關係。
     2.製造業廠商推動服務化時,在服務範疇上會考慮往供應鏈上下游延伸,以及發揮本身的優勢功能;在作法上則會以提供客戶「一次購足」與「完整解決方案」的服務為主。
     3.製造業廠商在推動服務化的發展方案時,會進行跨部門的組織運作,並且透過教育訓練和跨域合作的方式,培養員工新的專業知識與技能。
     4.製造業廠商推動服務化時,若本身的事業知識越豐富,則越能洞悉產業的發展趨勢,此外,若是其擁有更完整的市場知識,則有助於提出創新的服務概念。
     5.製造業廠商推動服務化時,不管是創造新的實體系統,或就原有的實體系統進行整合與建構,都會強調資通訊科技的輔助效果。而企業對於技術知識的掌握度越高,則越有助於服務創新的發展。
     6.製造業廠商推動服務化時,會以「創新」作為組織新的價值觀與企業文化。
     
     關鍵字:製造業服務化、服務創新、核心能耐
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In the trend of global development of service economy, service innovation has become an emerging hot topic of industries. Taiwanese companies, the main part of which are manufacturing industries in the past, also realize the phenomenon that the income and gross margin are deceasing, and the difference between manufacturing and service industries has become blurred. In order to gain long-term competitive advantages, some manufacturing firms has noticed that being in the lead of cost, skill and quality during the past is unable to enhance the value-added of industries. Therefore, they think it is a must to extend their activities to both ends of the value chain, and then to gain value-added on products by using service. However, this has become the key to success for present-day manufacturing industry.
      In the past, most researches related to service innovation mainly focus on the process and strategic level of innovative service development, the developing model of service innovation, or projects on service innovation. Besides, regarding the servitization of manufacturing firms, only a small number of studies focus on investigating the transformation of industry and operational strategy and models, but there are fewer case studies on servicizing development of manufacturing industry. Therefore, this study focuses on the intension of service innovation of servicizing manufacturing firms by means of thorough interview and case study. Besides, this study is auxiliary by the perspective of core competence to explore the relationship between servitization of manufacturing firms and the construction of organizational core competence, and aims to provide a reference for Taiwanese manufacturing firms which purpose to develop servitization in the future.
     The preliminary research findings include:
     1.Manufacturing firms will “positively” create customers’ need during contact with customers in terms of their background knowledge of internal and external environments, provide differential value-added service, and develop partnership with customers.
     2.Manufacturing firms will consider extending their service to the up- and down-stream of supply chain, or bring their superior function into service development when driving the development of servitization. And the way they do is to provide their customers with service of “One-stop Shopping” and “Total Solution” via front- and back-end systems and service providers.
     3.Manufacturing firms will proceed on trans-departmental organizational operation when driving the development of servitization. And they train their employees to have professional knowledge and skills through educational training and interdisciplinary collaboration to drive the service innovation.
     4.The more industrial knowledge the manufacturing firms have, the more insights into the industrial trend they have. Besides, it will be help to bring up ideas about innovative service if companies know well about their markets.
     5.When manufacturing firms drive the servitization, no matter what to create a new physical system or integrate the original physical systems to a new one, the auxiliary effect of ICT is emphasized. And the more technical knowledge they have, the more chances of innovative service development they will find.
     6.“Innovation” is regarded as a new value and enterprise culture when manufacturing firms drive the development of servitization.
     
     Keywords: Servitization of Manufacturing, Service Innovation, Core Competence
en_US
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 第一章 緒論 1
     第一節 研究背景與動機 1
     第二節 研究目的與問題 3
     第二章 文獻探討 5
     第一節 製造業服務化 5
     一、製造業服務化現象 5
     二、製造業服務化趨勢與內涵 6
     三、製造業服務化可能的發展方向 9
     第二節 服務 12
     一、服務的定義 12
     二、服務的特性 12
     第三節 服務創新 15
     一、服務創新的定義 15
     二、服務創新模型 16
     第四節 核心能耐 23
     一、核心能耐的定義 23
     二、核心能耐的內涵 26
     三、核心能耐的建構 28
     第五節 本章小結 30
     第三章 研究方法 33
     第一節 研究流程 33
     第二節 研究架構 34
     第三節 研究變數定義 35
     一、服務創新構面 35
     二、核心能耐構面 35
     第四節 研究設計 36
     一、研究方法 36
     二、資料蒐集 36
     三、研究限制 38
     第四章 個案分析 41
     第一節 台灣積體電路公司個案 42
     一、公司簡介 42
     二、個案背景介紹 46
     三、服務創新內涵 47
     四、服務創新隱含的知識基礎 55
     五、核心能耐內涵 57
     第二節 裕隆汽車個案 61
     一、公司簡介 61
     二、個案背景介紹 65
     三、服務創新內涵 66
     四、服務創新隱含的知識基礎 72
     五、核心能耐內涵 74
     第三節 帝寶工業個案 79
     一、公司簡介 79
     二、個案背景介紹 83
     三、服務創新內涵 83
     四、服務創新隱含的知識基礎 88
     五、核心能耐內涵 90
     第四節 個案彙整 92
     第五章 研究發現與討論 97
     第一節 製造業廠商推動服務創新的動機與內涵 97
     第二節 製造業廠商推動服務創新的知識基礎 103
     第三節 製造業服務化與組織核心能耐之關係 108
     第六章 研究結論與建議 111
     第一節 研究結論 111
     第二節 研究建議 114
     一、實務上的建議 114
     二、後續研究建議 115
     參考文獻 117
     附錄 122
-
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
      第一節 研究背景與動機 1
      第二節 研究目的與問題 3
     第二章 文獻探討 5
      第一節 製造業服務化 5
      一、製造業服務化現象 5
      二、製造業服務化趨勢與內涵 6
      三、製造業服務化可能的發展方向 9
      第二節 服務 12
      一、服務的定義 12
      二、服務的特性 12
      第三節 服務創新 15
      一、服務創新的定義 15
      二、服務創新模型 16
      第四節 核心能耐 23
      一、核心能耐的定義 23
      二、核心能耐的內涵 26
      三、核心能耐的建構 28
      第五節 本章小結 30
     第三章 研究方法 33
      第一節 研究流程 33
      第二節 研究架構 34
      第三節 研究變數定義 35
      一、服務創新構面 35
      二、核心能耐構面 35
      第四節 研究設計 36
      一、研究方法 36
      二、資料蒐集 36
      三、研究限制 38
     第四章 個案分析 41
      第一節 台灣積體電路公司個案 42
      一、公司簡介 42
      二、個案背景介紹 46
      三、服務創新內涵 47
      四、服務創新隱含的知識基礎 55
      五、核心能耐內涵 57
      第二節 裕隆汽車個案 61
      一、公司簡介 61
      二、個案背景介紹 65
      三、服務創新內涵 66
      四、服務創新隱含的知識基礎 72
      五、核心能耐內涵 74
      第三節 帝寶工業個案 79
      一、公司簡介 79
      二、個案背景介紹 83
      三、服務創新內涵 83
      四、服務創新隱含的知識基礎 88
      五、核心能耐內涵 90
      第四節 個案彙整 92
     第五章 研究發現與討論 97
      第一節 製造業廠商推動服務創新的動機與內涵 97
      第二節 製造業廠商推動服務創新的知識基礎 103
      第三節 製造業服務化與組織核心能耐之關係 108
     第六章 研究結論與建議 111
      第一節 研究結論 111
      第二節 研究建議 114
      一、實務上的建議 114
      二、後續研究建議 115
     參考文獻 117
     附錄 122
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097359009en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 製造業服務化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 服務創新zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 核心能耐zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 製造業廠商推動服務化之研究--核心能耐的觀點zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Servitization of manufacturing firms: the perspective of core competenceen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、英文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.Aaker, D. A. (1989), “Managing Assets and Skills: The Key to Sustainable Competitive. Advantage.” California Management Review, 31(2): 91-106.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.Baines, T. et al. (2007), “State-of-the-Art in Product Service Systems”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.Bitran, G., and L. Pedrosa (1998), “Structural Product Development Perspective for Service Operations.” European Management Journal, 16(2): 169-189.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.Booz, Allen and Hamilton (1982), New Product Management for the 1980s. Booz, Allen & Hamilton Inc., New York, NY.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.Chandler, A.D., Jr. (1962), Strategy and Structure: Concepts in the History of the Industrial Enterprise, MIT Press, Casender.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.Cohen, Morris, Carl Cull, Hau Lee and Don Willen (2000), “Saturn’s Supply-Chain Innovation: High Value in After-Sales Service”, Sloan Management Review, 93-101.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.Davies, A. (2003), "Are Firms Moving ‘Downstream’ into High-Value Services?" Service Innovation, Series on Technology Management, 9: 21-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.Froehle, C.M., Roth, A.V., Chase, R.B. and Voss, C.A. (2000), “Antecedents of New Service Development Effectiveness: An Exploratory Examination of Strategic Operations Choices.” Journal of Service Research, 3(1), August: Sage Publications, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.Grant, R.M. (1991), “The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation.” California Management Review, 33(3), Spring: 114-135.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.Gustafsson, A. and Johnson, D. (2003), Competing In A Service Economy: How To Create A Competitive Advantage Through Service Development And Innovation, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 25-28, 119.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.Hall, R. (1992). “The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resource”, Strategic Management Journal, 13(2): 135-144.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.Hertog, P. den, Bilderbeek, R. (1998). “Conceptualizing (Service) Innovation and the Knowledge Flows between KIBS and Their Client.” TNO/Dialogic-SI4S-report no.8, Apeldoorn/Utrecht.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.Hertog, P. den, Bilderbeek, R. (1999). “Conceptualizing Service Innovation and Service Innovation Patterns.” Paper in the framework of the SIID Project, Dialogic, Utrecht.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.Hill, Charles W.L. and Jones G.R. (1998), Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.Homburg, C., Garbe, B. (1999), "Towards an Improved Understanding of Industrial Services: Quality Dimensions and their Impact on Buyer-Seller Relationships", Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 6(2): 39-71.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16.Javidan, M. (1998), “Core Competence: What Does It Mean in Practice?” Long Range Planning, 31(1): 60-71.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.Kalliokoski Petri, Göran Andersson, Vesa Salminen and Jukka Hemilä (2003), “BestServ Feasibility Study”, Technology Industries of Finland, Helsinki.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18.Kotler, P. (1991), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19.Leonard-Barton, D. (1992), “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development.” Strategic Management Journal, 13: 111-125.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20.Leonard-Barton, D. (1995), Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21.Neely, Andy (2007), “The Servitization of Manufacturing: an Analysis of Global Trends”. To be presented at the 14th European Operations Management Association Conference, Ankara, Turkey.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22.Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1985), “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research.” Journal of Marketing 49, Fall: 41-50.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23.Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel G. (1990), “The Core Competence of the Corporation.” Harvard Business Review, May-June: 79-91.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24.Ren, G. and Gregory, M.J. (2007), “Servitization in Manufacturing Companies: a Conceptualization, Critical Review and Research Agenda.” in 2007 Frontiers in Service Conference. San Francisco, CA, USA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25.Shostack, L. (1997), “Breaking Free from Product Marketing.” Journal of Marketing, 41, April: 73-80.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26.Toffel, Michael W. (2008), “Contracting for Servicizing”, Harvard Business School Working Paper, No.08-063.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27.Vandermerwe, S. and Rada, J. (1988), “Servitization of Business: Adding Value by Adding Services.” European Management Journal, 6(4).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28.Voss, C.A. (1992), “Measurement of Innovation and Design Performance in Services.” Design Management Journal, Winter: 40-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 29.White, Allen L., Stoughton, M. and Feng, L. (1999), “Servicizing: The Quiet Transition to Extended Product Responsibility”, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 30.Windrum, P. and Tomlinson, M. (1999), “Knowledge-intensive Services and International Competitiveness: a Four Country Comparison.” Research Memoranda 023, Maastricht: MERIT, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 31.Wise, R. and Baumgartner, P. (1999), “Go Downstream: The New Profit Imperative in Manufacturing.” Harvard Business Review, 77(5): 133-141.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 32.Yin, R.K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、中文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.工研院 (2010),製造服務化趨勢下之產業人才發展策略,經濟部技術處。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.中華經濟研究院執行 (2007),經濟部96年度服務業發展情勢年報—商業服務業,經濟部商業司編印。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司 (2010),民國九十八年度年報(一)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.司徒達賢、林晉寬 (1995),「資源基礎理論與企業競爭優勢關係」,八十四年度國家科學委員會管理學門專題計畫研究成果發表論文集。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.古永嘉 (1996),企業研究方法,台北:華泰。譯自Cooper, D.R. & Emony, W. (1995), Business Research Methods。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.伍忠賢 (2006),透視台積電,台北:五南圖書。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.池惠婷等 (2008),製造業新價值~衍生商業服務契機,工研院產經中心、資策會市場中心出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.金聯舫、丘宏昌 (2009),「台灣半導體業縱覽與台積電的經營、台積電的發展與服務的關係」,服務科學入門10講,頁23-44,台北:智勝文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.李元墩、吳濟民 (2004),「知識管理策略、組織核心能耐與經營績效之關係-以台灣生物科技產業為實證」,科技管理學刊,第九卷第二期,頁103-129。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.周雍強、鍾顯榮 (2009),「專業製造之產能服務能耐的競爭理論」,管理與系統,第十六卷第一期,頁53-74。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.林玉惠 (2008),「製造業轉型為服務導向企業之研究:以服務科學的觀點」,國立中興大學科技管理研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.林盈志 (2008),「企業推動服務創新專案之研究—以「卓越服務獎」得獎企業為例」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.吳思華 (2000),策略九說,臉譜文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.吳豐祥 (2004),「企業的核心能耐」,經濟日報,2004/05/29。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.施振榮 (1996),再造宏碁:開創、成長與挑戰,天下遠見出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16.帝寶工業股份有限公司 (2010),九十八年度年報。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.徐作聖等 (2007),科技服務業發展策略及應用—以RFID為例,新竹:交大出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18.郭建良 (2008),產業觀點下的服務創新方法論V1.0,工研院產經中心、資策會市場中心出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19.高佑嘉、賴怡叡 (2009),製造業服務化與資訊應用調查報告,經濟部技術處。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20.陳嵩 (2004),「新金融產品開發活動之執行品質與績效—台灣銀行業與保險業之研究」,台大管理論叢,第十四卷,第二期,頁49-78。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21.陳東升 (2003),積體網路:臺灣高科技產業的社會學分析,台北:群學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22.陳信宏 (2008),「台灣製造服務化的可能模式:借鏡芬蘭的政策觀點」,國際經濟情勢雙週報,1667期,中華經濟研究院。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23.陳炳宏 (2008),「金融服務業服務創新專案與組織核心能耐關係之研究—以中國信託商業銀行為例」,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24.陳國榮 (2003),「台灣汽車產業價值鏈的趨勢探討」,國立交通大學管理學院高階主管管理學程碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25.陳萬淇 (1985),個案研究法,台北:華泰。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26.張劭勳 (2001),研究方法,滄海出版社,頁303-304。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27.曾鳳秋 (2009),「飯店產業服務創新專案開發模式-以日月潭雲品酒店為例」,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28.黃楹均、郭怡君 (2008),台灣服務業中長期發展關鍵與策略,工研院產經中心、資策會市場中心出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 29.葉仲斌 (2007),「晶圓代工產業服務價值傳遞與服務創新之研究」,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 30.裘以嘉 (2009),「從製造到服務之轉型探討-以華碩、台積電及巨大機械為例」,國立交通大學管理學院高階主管管理碩士學程論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 31.裕隆汽車股份有限公司 (2010),九十八年度年報。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 32.顏淑馨 (2004),競爭大未來,智庫文化出版。譯自Gary Hamel &C.K. Prahalad (1994),Competing For The Future。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 三、網路資源zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.裕隆汽車網站 http://www.yulon-motor.com.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.裕隆企業集團網站 http://www.yulongroup.com.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.台積電網站 http://www.tsmc.com/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.帝寶工業網站 http://www.depoautolamp.com/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.公開資訊觀測站 http://mops.twse.com.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.IC Insights http://www.icinsights.com/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.sriiAP服務創新知識庫 http://www.sriiap.org/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.全球運籌管理—個案探討「台積電」 http://tinyurl.com/36pje93zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.「後ECFA時代的產業政策」,陸資來台服務網 http://iitw.cnfi.org.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.經濟部—人才快訊:我國製造業服務化趨勢下人才發展問題之探討 http://itriexpress.blogspot.com/2010/12/blog-post_06.htmlzh_TW