學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 個案研究-華碩切割和碩
Case studty: Asus Divested Pegatron
作者 伍建興
貢獻者 周行一
伍建興
關鍵詞 華碩
和碩
水平切割
股權結構
日期 2010
上傳時間 29-Sep-2011 16:47:39 (UTC+8)
摘要 2009年12月11日,華碩宣告將透過資產分割方式來完成了股東們一致期盼的品牌、代工分家切割,但在宣告後華碩股價反而重挫,並引起市場上一陣恐慌。本論文透過個案研究方式,歸納出華碩未採取權益分割的方式而選擇資產分割的主要原因為:資產分割可帶來最快速且獨立性的分割,達成公司對外宣稱的策略目標-品牌代工完全分離。但資產分割所衍生的流動性問題,為造成市場恐慌的主要因素。
      股東結構的組成將影響宣告分割的效果及市場反應,華碩擁有35%以上的外資股東,但外資股東在內規中無法持有未上市股票,所以外資股東在資產分割中所面臨的流動性問題,在短期內對股價是負面反應。
      最後華碩、和碩進行分割後並未如管理階層所述創造超額報酬,本文推測主要原因為產業發生變化,使華碩、和碩失去垂直整合好處。
參考文獻 中文文獻
1. 黃郁卿,2004,企業分割策略效益-以閎暉公司為個案探討
2. 康美雪,2009,國內上市櫃公司從事企業分割之探討
英文文獻
1. Allen J.W. and John J.M.,1998, “Equity Carve-Outs and Managerial Discretion”, The Journal of Finance, no. 1 Feb, Pages 163-185
2. Berkovitch E.,1993, “Motives for Takeovers: An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 28, Pages 347-362
3. Block S.,2009, “Does the Corporate Spin-offs Maximize Value for Stockholders?”, Corporate Finance Review, Vol. 13, Pages 6-14
4. Fluck Z. and Anthony L.., 1999, “Why Do Firms Merge and Then Divest? A Theory of Financial Synergy”, The Journal of Business, Vol. 72, No. 3, July, Pages 319-346
5. Hanousek J., Evzen K. and Jan S., 2009, “Divestitures, Privatization and Corporate Performance in Emerging Markests”, Economics of Transition, Vol. 17, Issue 1, Pages 43-73
6. Hite G. and James O.,1983, “Security Price Reactions Around Corporate Spin-off Announcements”, Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 12, Issue 4, Pages 409-436
7. Johnson S. and Daniel K.,1996, “The Effects of Spin-offs on Corporate Investment and Performance”, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 19, Pages 293-307
8. Klein A., James R. and William B.,1991, “The Two Stages of an Equity Carve-out and The Price Response of Parent and Subsidiary Stock”, Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 12, Issue 6, Pages 449-460
9. Matsusake J. and Vikram N.,1995, “Internal Capital Markets and Corporate Refocusing”, Journal of Financial Intermediation, Vol. 11, Issue 2, Pages 176-211
10. Porter M.E., 1991, “Towards a Dynamic Theory of Strategy”, Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), p.95-117
11. Slade M., 1998, “Bear and the Tie: Did Divestiture of Brewer-owned Public Houses Lead to Higher Beer Price?”, Economic Journal, Pages 565-602
12. Wei H., Tarun M. and Peiwang W.,(2009), “Agency Problems in Tracking Stock and Minority Carve-out Decision: Explaining the Discrepancy in Short- and Long-term Performances”, Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 33, Pages 27-42
13. Yin R.K., 1994. Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd edition.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財務管理研究所
97357011
99
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097357011
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 周行一zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 伍建興zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 伍建興zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 29-Sep-2011 16:47:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 29-Sep-2011 16:47:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-Sep-2011 16:47:39 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0097357011en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/50814-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財務管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97357011zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 2009年12月11日,華碩宣告將透過資產分割方式來完成了股東們一致期盼的品牌、代工分家切割,但在宣告後華碩股價反而重挫,並引起市場上一陣恐慌。本論文透過個案研究方式,歸納出華碩未採取權益分割的方式而選擇資產分割的主要原因為:資產分割可帶來最快速且獨立性的分割,達成公司對外宣稱的策略目標-品牌代工完全分離。但資產分割所衍生的流動性問題,為造成市場恐慌的主要因素。
      股東結構的組成將影響宣告分割的效果及市場反應,華碩擁有35%以上的外資股東,但外資股東在內規中無法持有未上市股票,所以外資股東在資產分割中所面臨的流動性問題,在短期內對股價是負面反應。
      最後華碩、和碩進行分割後並未如管理階層所述創造超額報酬,本文推測主要原因為產業發生變化,使華碩、和碩失去垂直整合好處。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 6
     第一節 研究動機 6
     第二節 研究目的 8
     第三節 研究架構 8
     第二章 文獻回顧 10
     第一節 併購活動動機 10
     第二節 我國分割制度比較 12
     第三節 權益分割與資產分割公司特徵 14
     第四節 我國企業分割 16
     第三章 研究目標與方法 18
     第四章 個案背景 21
     第一節 華碩 21
     第二節 五力分析 23
     第五章 實證結果分析 26
     第一節 華碩進行資產分割原因 26
     第二節 股權結構是否影響分割活動 33
     第三節 分割宣告效果及報酬率比較 35
     第六章 結論與建議 41
     參考文獻 43
     
     
     圖表目錄
     圖 一 1997-2009 華碩宏碁累積報酬率比較 28
     圖 二1997-2002 華碩宏碁累積報酬率比較 28
     圖 三 2002-2007華碩宏碁累積報酬率比較 28
     圖 四 2007-2009華碩宏碁累積報酬率比較 28
     圖 五 華碩外資持股變化 34
     圖 六 華碩分割後累積報酬率比較 36
     圖 七 和碩分割後累積報酬率比較 37
     圖 八 華碩集團分割後累積報酬率比較 38
     
     
     表 一 公司分割與營業讓與比較 13
     表 二 權益分割與資產分割比較 13
     表 三 切割流程 22
     表 四 宣告日T-3~T+3異常報酬率及累積報酬率 36
     表 五 分割後財務績效表現 39
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097357011en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 華碩zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 和碩zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 水平切割zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 股權結構zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 個案研究-華碩切割和碩zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Case studty: Asus Divested Pegatronen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. 黃郁卿,2004,企業分割策略效益-以閎暉公司為個案探討zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. 康美雪,2009,國內上市櫃公司從事企業分割之探討zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. Allen J.W. and John J.M.,1998, “Equity Carve-Outs and Managerial Discretion”, The Journal of Finance, no. 1 Feb, Pages 163-185zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. Berkovitch E.,1993, “Motives for Takeovers: An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 28, Pages 347-362zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. Block S.,2009, “Does the Corporate Spin-offs Maximize Value for Stockholders?”, Corporate Finance Review, Vol. 13, Pages 6-14zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. Fluck Z. and Anthony L.., 1999, “Why Do Firms Merge and Then Divest? A Theory of Financial Synergy”, The Journal of Business, Vol. 72, No. 3, July, Pages 319-346zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. Hanousek J., Evzen K. and Jan S., 2009, “Divestitures, Privatization and Corporate Performance in Emerging Markests”, Economics of Transition, Vol. 17, Issue 1, Pages 43-73zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. Hite G. and James O.,1983, “Security Price Reactions Around Corporate Spin-off Announcements”, Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 12, Issue 4, Pages 409-436zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. Johnson S. and Daniel K.,1996, “The Effects of Spin-offs on Corporate Investment and Performance”, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 19, Pages 293-307zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. Klein A., James R. and William B.,1991, “The Two Stages of an Equity Carve-out and The Price Response of Parent and Subsidiary Stock”, Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 12, Issue 6, Pages 449-460zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. Matsusake J. and Vikram N.,1995, “Internal Capital Markets and Corporate Refocusing”, Journal of Financial Intermediation, Vol. 11, Issue 2, Pages 176-211zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. Porter M.E., 1991, “Towards a Dynamic Theory of Strategy”, Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), p.95-117zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. Slade M., 1998, “Bear and the Tie: Did Divestiture of Brewer-owned Public Houses Lead to Higher Beer Price?”, Economic Journal, Pages 565-602zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. Wei H., Tarun M. and Peiwang W.,(2009), “Agency Problems in Tracking Stock and Minority Carve-out Decision: Explaining the Discrepancy in Short- and Long-term Performances”, Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 33, Pages 27-42zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13. Yin R.K., 1994. Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd edition.zh_TW