dc.contributor.advisor | 賴惠玲 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Lai, Huei Ling | en_US |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 彭曉貞 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Peng, Xiao Zhen | en_US |
dc.creator (作者) | 彭曉貞 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | Peng, Xiao Zhen | en_US |
dc.date (日期) | 2010 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 5-Oct-2011 14:25:51 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 5-Oct-2011 14:25:51 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 5-Oct-2011 14:25:51 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0098555009 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51162 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 98555009 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 99 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本論文應用隱喻與轉喻之理論觀點,探討台灣客語分類詞諺語之認知語意機制如何運作。首先,根據Kövecses and Radden (1998) 從認知語言學角度所提出的轉喻理論,分析台灣客語分類詞諺語中的轉喻類型。接著,本論文分析台灣客語分類詞諺語中隱喻機制的運作,結果發現普遍而言,隱喻都是以轉喻為基礎。此外,本研究針對Radden (2003) 所提出以轉喻為基礎的隱喻之四種來源分類提出修正。 除了呈現認知語意機制,文化制約之世界普遍性及台灣客家文化之特殊性也在台灣客語分類詞諺語中展現出來。最後,透過Lakoff and Turner (1989) 所提出的生命物種之大鏈隱喻,我們了解諺語所表達的最終概念是以人為中心,而且諺語通常帶有勸世的功能。簡言之,本論文藉由探討認知語意機制如何在台灣客語分類詞諺語中運作,呈現人類認知過程以及展現台灣客家文化。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This thesis aims to explore how the cognitive mechanisms are operated in the classifiers and measure words in Taiwanese Hakka proverbial expressions, in particular metonymy, the interaction between metaphor and metonymy, idiomaticity, and cultural constraints. Since human conceptual system is fundamentally metaphorical in nature, classifiers, representing conceptual classification of the world, are found to manifest metonymically and metaphorically. First, based on the metonymic relationships proposed by Kövecses and Radden (1998), cases involving metonymy are carefully spelled out. Then, cases involving the interaction between metaphor and metonymy are elaborated. The metaphors activated in these cases are generally grounded in metonymy, which evidences that metaphors generally have a metonymic basis (Radden 2003). Apart from displaying cognitive mechanisms, the classifier/measure word proverbial expressions in Taiwanese Hakka exhibit Taiwanese Hakka-specific cultural constraints and near universality in conceptual metaphors (Kövecses 2002). Cases which are more specific to Taiwanese Hakka are semantically more opaque whereas cases which are more near universal are semantically more transparent (Gibbs 1995). Furthermore, through the GREAT CHAIN METAPHOR proposed by Lakoff and Turner (1989), we know that all the proverbial expressions are ultimately concerned about human beings. Moreover, proverbial expressions tend to carry pragmatic-social functions, conveying exhortations. In brief, the cognitive mechanisms of metonymy as well as the interaction between metaphor and metonymy are pervasively found in classifier/measure word proverbial expressions in Taiwanese Hakka. Through unraveling the conceptual mechanisms associated with classifiers and measure words in Taiwanese Hakka proverbial expressions, this study betters our understanding of human cognition in general and Taiwanese Hakka culture in particular. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | CHAPTERI. INTRODUCTION 11.1 Motivation and Purpose 11.2 Conventions of the Data 61.3 Organization of the Thesis 7II. PREVIOUS STUDIES ON CLASSIFIERS 82.1 Defining Classifiers 92.2 Classifiers as the Conceptual Classification of the World 112.3 Classifiers as the Manifestation of Metaphors and Metonymies 242.4 Remarks 27III. METAPHOR AND METONYMY 293.1 Metonymy 303.2 Metaphor 373.3 The Interaction Between Metaphor and Metonymy 403.4 Idiomaticity 443.5 Cultural Constraints 49IV. ANALYSIS 554.1 Classifier-Proverbial Constructions 564.2 Cases Involving Metonymy 574.3 Cases Involving Interaction Between Metaphor and Metonymy 734.4 Cultural Constraints 97V. CONCLUDING REMARKS 1125.1 Summary of the Thesis 1125.2 Implications and Future Studies 115APPENDIX I 119APPENDIX II 127REFERENCES 130 | zh_TW |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098555009 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 客語 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 分類詞 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 諺語 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 隱喻 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 轉喻 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Hakka | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | classifiers | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | proverbial expressions | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | metaphor | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | metonymy | en_US |
dc.title (題名) | 台灣客語分類詞諺語:隱喻與轉喻之應用 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | Classifier/Measure word proverbial expressions in Taiwanese Hakka: metaphor and metonymy | en_US |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Adams, K. L. 1989. Systems of Numeral Classification in the Mon-Khmer, Nicobarese and Aslian Subfamilies of Austroasiatic. Canberra: Pacific linguistics. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2003. Classifier: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Allan, K. 1977. Classifiers. Language 53.2: 282-311. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Barnden, J. A. 2010. Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics 21.1: 1-34. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carter, R. and M. McCarthy. 1988. Vocabulary and Language Teaching. London: Longman. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chafe, W. 1970. Meaning and the Structure of Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chen, X.-H. 2009 Mandarin classifiers in modern poetry. M. A. Thesis. National Chung Cheng University. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chen, Y.-Y. 2003. A comparative study of classifiers in Southern Min and Hakka in Taiwan. M. A. Thesis. National Chung Cheng University. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chomsky, N. 1980. Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chui, K.-W., H.-L. Lai, and H.-C. Chan. 2008. The NCCU Corpus of Spoken Chinese : Mandarin, Hakka, and Southern Min. http://140.119.174.187/ | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chung, S.-F. 2010. Numeral classifier buah in Malay: A corpus-based study. Language and Linguistics 11.3: 553-577. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Croft, W. and D. A. Cruse 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Erbaugh, M. S. 1986. Taking stock: The development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children. Noun Classes and Categorization, ed. by C. Craig, 399-436. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blendinng and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fraser, B. 1970. Idioms within a transformational grammar. Foundations of Language 6: 22-42. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gao, H.-S. 2005. Lexical manifestation of human thinking process in Mandarin: A metaphoric and metonymic account. M.A. Thesis. National Chengchi University. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gibbs, R. W. 1995. Idiomaticity and human cognition. Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives, eds. by M. Everaert, E.-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk, and R. Schreuder, 97–116. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Grady, J. and C. Johnson. 2003. Converging evidence for the notions of subscene and primary scene. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, eds. by R. Dirven and R. Pörings, 533-554. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | He, J. 2008. Xiandai Hanyu Liangci Yanjiu [The Study of Measures in Modern Chinese]. Beijing: Beijing University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Her, O.-S. and C.-T. Hsieh. 2010. On the semantic distinction between classifiers and measure words in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 11.3: 527-551. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hoijer, H. 1945. Classificatory verb stems in Apachean languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 11: 13-23. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hsu, T.-T. 2009. Emergence of Chinese sortal classifiers and the interactive of human categorization. M. A. Thesis. National Tsing Hua University. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hu, Q. 1993. The acquisition of Chinese classifiers by young Mandarin-speaking children. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Huang, C.-R. and K. Ahrens. 2003. Individuals, kinds and events: Classifier Coercion of Nouns. Language Sciences 25: 353-373. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Huang, Y.-D. 2004. Taiwan Kejia Duben [Taiwanese Hakka Reader]. Taipei : Council for Hakka Affairs, Executive Yuan. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hung, F.-S. 1996. Prosody and the Acquisition of Grammatical Morphemes in Chinese Languages. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Johnson, C. 1999. Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of see. Cultural, Psychological and Typological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics, eds. by M. Hiraga, C. Sinha, and S. Wilcox, 155-169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: the Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Katz, J. 1973. Compositionality, idiomaticity, and lexical substitution. A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, eds. by S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky, 357-376. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kleiber, G. 1990. La sémantique du prototype: Catégories et Sens Lexical. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kövecses, Z. 2002. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kövecses, Z. and G. Radden. 1998. Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9: 37-77. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kövecses, Z. and P. Szabó. 1996. Idioms: a view from cognitive linguistics. Applied Linguistics 17.3: 326-355. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lai, H.-L. 2005. A taxonomic framework for two-part allegorical sayings. Paper presented at 9th International Cognitive Linguistics conference, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lakoff, G. 1986. Classifiers as a reflection of mind. Noun Classes and Categorization, ed. by C. Craig, 13-52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lakoff, G. and M. Turner. 1989. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Langacker, R. W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lee, W.-C. 2005. Hai-lu classifiers: An interactional approach. M. A. Thesis. National Tsing Hua University. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Li, M.-L. 1998. A study of measures in the Southern Min dialect. M. A. Thesis. National Chung Cheng University. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Liang, Y.-C. 2006. Nominal Phrases in English and Japanese Speakers’ L2 Mandarin Grammars. Ph.D. Dissertation. Cambridge University. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Luo, Z.-J. 1988. Keyu Yufa [Hakka Grammar]. Taipei: Student. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Luo, Z.-J. 1990. Taiwan de Kejiahua [Hakka Dialects in Taiwan]. Taipei: Taiyuan Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ma, B.-J. and L.-M. Zhang. 2001. Hanyu liangci biyu yongfa chutan [Preliminary analysis of metaphorical usages of Chinese classifiers]. Linguistic Researches 2: 33-37. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nunberg, G., I. A. Sag and T. Wasow. 1994. Idioms. Language 70: 491-538. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | O`Grady, W. 1996. Semantics: The analysis of meaning. Contemporary Linguistics: An Introduction, eds. by, W. O`Grady, M. Dobrovolsky, and F. Katamba, 268-312. London: Longman. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pinker, S. 1989. Learnability and Cognition: The acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Qiu, X.-Y. 2007. Minnanyu he Kejiahua de liangci—yu Guoyu bijiao [‘The measure word’ of the Southern Min language and Hakka—compare with Mandarin]. Hsuan Chuang Humanities Journal 6: 1-26. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Quinn, N. and D. Holland. 1987. Culture and cognition. Cultural Models in Language and Thought, eds. by D. Holland and N. Quinn, 3-40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Radden, G. 2003. How metonymic are metaphors? Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, eds. by R. Dirven and R. Pörings, 407-434. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Reddy, M. 1979. The conduit metaphor. Metaphor and Thought, ed. by A. Ortony, 284-297. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rosch, E. 1975. Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology 7: 532-47. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rosch, E. and C. Mervis. 1975. Family resemblances: studies in the internal structures of categorization. Cognitive Psychology 7: 573-605. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. 2003. The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective, ed. by A. Barcelona, 109-132. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schmitt, B. H. and S. Zhang. 1998. Language Structure and Categorization: A Study of Classifiers in Consumer Cognition, Judgment, and Choice. Journal of Consumer Research 25.2: 108-122. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Smith, E. E., E. J. Shoben and L. J. Rips. 1974. Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic desicions. Psychological Review 1: 214-241. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tai, James H.-Y., and F. Chao. 1994. A semantic study of the classifier zhang (張). Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 29.3: 67-78. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tai, James H.-Y., and L.-Q. Wang. 1990. A semantic study of tiao (條). Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 25.1: 35-56. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tai, James H.-Y., L.-W. Hu, and H.-J. Liu 2000-2001. Categorization Patterns of Classifiers in Taiwan Hakka and their Cognitive Principles. (NSC 89-2411-H-194-056) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tai, James H.-Y., Y.-J. Li, and M.-L. Guo. 1997. Categorization Patterns of Classifiers in Taiwanese Southern Min and their Cognitive Principles. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (NSC 86-2411-H-194-005) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tai, James H.-Y., Y.-Y. Chen and M.-S. Chen. 2001-2002. Categorization Patterns of Classifiers in Taiwan Hakka and Their Cognitive Principles, II. (NSC 90-2411-H-194-024) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Taylor, J. R. 2003. Category extension by metonymy and metaphor. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, eds. by R. Dirven and R. Pörings, 323-348. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tien, Y.-M., Ovid J.-L. Tzeng, and Daisy L. Hung. 2002. Hanyu fenleici de yuyi yu renzhi jichu: gongneng yufa guandian [Semantic and cognitive basis of Chinese classifiers: a functional approach]. Language and Linguistics 3.1: 101-132. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ungerer, F. and H.-J. Schmid. 2006. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Longman. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wu, L.-W. 2001. A study of measures in Taiwan Si Xian Hakka. M. A. Thesis. National Chung Cheng University. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wu, Z.-L. 2010. Research on Taiwan Hakka measure words. M. A. Thesis. National Central University. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yu, N. 2002. Body and emotion: Body parts in Chinese expression of emotion. Pragmatics and Cognition 10.1: 341–367 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zhang, N. 2009. Syntactic properties of numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Talk given on April 10, 2009, at the Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Chung Cheng University. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zhu, D.-X. 1982. Yufa Jiangyi [Lectures on Grammar]. Beijing : The Commercial Press. Dictionaries: | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jiaoyubu Taiwan Kejiayu Changyongci Cidian [Taiwanese Hakka Dictionary of Common Words]. 2006. http://hakka.dict.edu.tw | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Keyu Nengli Renzheng Jiben Cihui—Zhongji Zhonggaoji Ji Yuliaoxuancui [Hakka Language Proficiency Certification Rudimentary Vocabulary–Mediate and Intermediate Levels]. 2007. Taipei : Council for Hakka Affairs, Executive Yuan. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Taiwan Kejiahua Cidian [Hakka Dictionary of Taiwan]. 2001. Taipei : SMC. | zh_TW |