學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 團隊創新階段能耐因素之比較研究
The research of teamwork competencies in team innovation process
作者 高長瑞
Kao, Chung Rui
貢獻者 徐聯恩
Hsu, Michael L. A.
高長瑞
Kao, Chung Rui
關鍵詞 團隊創新
團隊歷程
團隊能耐
Team innovation
Team process
Teamwork competence
日期 2010
上傳時間 5-Oct-2011 14:34:06 (UTC+8)
摘要 團隊已經是普遍存在於組織中的一種工作型式,探討團隊效能的歷程研究還相當不足,了解也不夠。此外,就組織創新理論,團隊創新是其中之關鍵,要如何增加團隊創新效能也是重要研究議題,團隊創新是團隊各種效能表現中的一種。本文便是以團隊創新來研究團隊歷程。
團隊效能文獻主要以團隊I-P-O為主要模型,團隊效能是團隊投入因素透過團隊歷程活動後的產出。團隊歷程是影響團隊效能之主要因素,但是過去對團隊歷程研究卻較限制於橫切面研究,多未能探討團隊歷程之變動性。經由文獻探討,發現團隊合作能耐研究可以幫助了解團隊歷程。所謂的團隊合作能耐是指團隊合作的知識、技巧、能力、和其他特徵(KSAOs),近期研究者如Ilgen et al.將團隊歷程三分為IM-Forming階段、MO-Functioning階段、OI-結束與下階段的循環,並歸納在不同歷程階段,有不同的主要團隊合作能耐因素,讓團隊歷程更清楚,但是Ilgen et al等研究者並未回答團隊創新歷程。因此,本研究是根據團隊效能、團隊創新文獻為基礎,將團隊創新二分為團隊創意和思考、團隊創新實現二個階段,並探討團隊合作能耐重要性在這二個歷程階段的變化比較。
研究結果得到,(1) 資訊交流和分享是被認為最重要的團隊合作能耐,團隊信心的重要性則最低;(2) 團隊合作能耐重要性的確在不同團隊創新階段會有不同;(3) 團隊信心、資訊交流和分享、團隊默契在團隊創意階段變得比較重要,團隊凝聚力、團隊學習和適應、團隊規範和共識則是在團隊創新階段變得比較重要。
參考文獻 邱皓政,2000,組織創新環境的概念建構與測量工具發展。國科會整合型計劃「創新與創造力-技術創造力的涵義與開發」研討會論文集(2000)。
紀乃文,2008,團隊情感氛圍形成的前因、情境調節及個人層次後果變項之研究,台北,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
莊立民,2002,組織創新模式建構與實證之研究---以台灣資訊電子業為立,台南,國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
鄧聚龍,2000,灰色系統理論與應用,台北︰高立圖書有限公司。
鄭伯壎,2005,華人組織行為研究的方向與策略:由西化到本土化。本土心理學研究,24期。
王思峰、黃家齊、鄭俐敏,2002,團隊知識轉換與知識創造的實驗研究: 知識螺旋理論的驗證。管理與系統,9(1):29-60。
黃敏萍,2000,跨功能任務團隊之結構與效能—任務特性與社會系絡之影響,台北:國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。
黃敏萍、鄭伯壎,和王建忠,2003。轉型領導、團隊內互動、及團隊與成員效能:IPO模式之驗證。管理學報,20(3):397-427。
Amabile, T. M., 1988. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations, Research in organizational behavior, 10(1): 123-167.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M., 1996. Assessing the working environment for Creativity, Academy of Management Journal, 39(5): 1154-1184.
Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F., Beyond Task and Maintenance: Defining External Functions in Groups, Group & Organization Studies, 13(4), 468-494.
Ancona, D. G. & Caldwell, D. F., 1992a. Bridging the boundary: External activity & performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4): 634-665.
Ancona, D. G. & Caldwell, D. F., 1992b. Demography &design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3(3): 321-341.
Andrew, K.R. (1971), The Concept of Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. IL: Irwin Homewood.
Austin, J. R., 2003. Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 866-878.
Bandura, A., Social Foundations of Through and Action : A social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall(1986).
Brown, S., & Eisenhardt, K., 1995. Product development: Past research, present findings and future direction. Academy of Management Review, 20:343-378.
Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C., 1993. Relations between work group characteristics & effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46: 823-825.
Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., Medsker, G. J., 1996. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: a replication and extension. Personnel Psychology. 49: 429-452.
Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, eds. 1998. Making Decisions Under Stress: Implications for Individual and Team Training. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Tannenbaum, S.I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C.E., 1995. Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 333–380.
Carron, A.V., 1982. Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123–138.
Cartwright, D. and A. Zander (Eds.), Group Dynamics, (3rd Ed.), Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL, 1968.
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E., 1997. What makes teams work? Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23: 239-290.
DiMasi J. A., Hansen, R. W. & Grabowski, H. G., 2003. The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. Journal of Health Economics, 22, 151–185
Drucker, P. F., 1985, Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271–282.
Festinger,L.,Schachter,S.,Back,K.W.,1950.Social Pressures in Informal Groups:A Study of Human Factors in Housing. Harper,NewYork.
Gladstein, D. L., 1984. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 499-517.
Goodwin, G. F., Burke, C. S., Wildman, J. L. y Salas, E., 2008. Team effectiveness in complex organizations: An overview. En E. Salas, G.F. Goodwin y C.S. Burke (Eds.), Team Effectiveness in Complex Organizations. Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives and Approaches, New York: Psychology Press, 3-16.
Gregorich, S. E., Helmreich, R. L., & Wilhelm, J. A., 1990. The structure of cockpit management attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 682-690.
Guzzo, R.A. & Dickson, M.W., 1996. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance & effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47: 307-338.
Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P., 1992. Group performance & Intergroup relations in organizations. In Handbook of Industrial &Organizational Psychology, ed. Dunnette, M. D., & Hough, L. M., 3:269–313. Palo Alto, CA: Consult Psychology Press.
Hackman, J. R., 1990, Groups That Work (And Those That Do not): Creating Conditions for EVective Teamwork, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hackman, J. R., 1987. The design of work team. In J. W. Lorsh (Ed.) Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hareli, S., & Rafaeli, A., 2008. Emotion cycles: On the social influence of emotion in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 35-59.
Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., Jundt, D., 2005. TEAMS IN ORGANIZATIONS: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56:517-543.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there?: The implications of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14 (4), 29-64.
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., Neale, M. A., 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 741-763
Jelinek, M. & Wilson, J. 2005. Macro Influences on Multicultural Teams. In: Shapiro, D.L., von Glionow, M.A. & Cheng, J.L.C (editors), Managing Multinational Teams: Global Perspectives, Amsterdam et al.: Elsevier: 209-231.
Jelinek, M. & Wilson, J. 2005. Macro Influences on Multicultural Teams. In: Shapiro, D.L., von Glionow, M.A. & Cheng, J.L.C (editors), Managing Multinational Teams: Global Perspectives, Amsterdam et al.: Elsevier: 209-231.
Jung, D. I., Sosik, J. J., 1999. Effects of group characteristics on work group performance: a longitudinal investigation. Group Dynamics. 3: 279-290.
Katzenbach, J. R. & Smith, D. K., 1995. The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, March-April: 111-120.
Keller, R.T., 2001. Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44:547-555.
Kirton, M. J., 1989. A theory of cognitive style. In M. J. Kirton (Ed.). Adaptors and innovators. Styles of creativity and problem-solving, London: Routledge, 1-36.
Kleinman, D. L. and Serfaty, D., 1989, Team performance assessment in distributed decisionmaking, Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive Networked Simulation for Training , Orlando, 22-27.
Knight, D., Durham, C., & Locke, E. 2001. The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implementation, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 320-338.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., 1998. Training and developing adaptive teams: theory, principles, and research. See Cannon-Bowers & Salas 1998, pp. 115–153.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., Smith, E. M., 1999. Developing adaptive teams: a theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In The Changing Nature of Performance, ed. DR Ilgen, ED Pulakos, pp. 240–92. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Kozlowski, S. W. J. & Klein, K. J., 2000.  A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes.  In Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90).
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R., 2006. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams.  Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3): 77-124.
Leonard, D. and Sensiper, S., 1998. The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation, California Management Review, 40(3), 112-132.
Lester, S. W., Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, M. A., 2002, The Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Longitudinal Investigation of Newly Formed Work Groups, Academy of Management, 45(2), 352-368.
Lipnack, J. & Stamps, J., 1997. Virtual teams. In: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Little, B., & Madigan, R., 1997. The relationship between collective efficacy and performance in manufacturing work teams. Small Group Research, 28, 517-534.
Lynn, G.S. & Akgun, A.E., 1998. Innovation Strategies Under uncertainty: A Contingency Approach for New Product Development, Engineering management Journal, 10(3), 11-17.
Mansfield, E., 1991. Academic research and industrial innovation, Research Policy, 20, 1-12.
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., &Zaccaro, S. J., 2001. A temporally based framework & taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26:356-765.
Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A., 2000. The influence of shared mental models on team process & performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2): 273-283.
McGrath, J.E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. NewYork: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
McGrath, J. E., 1984. Groups: Interaction &performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Moreland, R. L., 1996. Lewin’s legacy for small groups research, Systems Practice, 9, 7–26.
Mullen, B., & Cooper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration, Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210–227.
Nieva, V.F., Fleishman, E.A., & Reick, A., 1978. Team dimensions: Their identity, their measurement, and their relationships. Washington, DC: ARRO.
Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-creating company, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
Paris, C. R., Salas, E. and Cannon-Bowers, J. A., 2000. Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1052–1075.
Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel G., 1990, The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, May-June: 79-91.
Prussia, G.E., & Kinicki, A.J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 187–198.
Ruffell-Smith, H. P., 1979, A Simulator Study of the Interaction of Pilot Workload with Errors. NASA technical report no. TM-78482 (MoVett Field: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Centre).
Salas, E. and Cannon-Bowers, J. A., 2000, The anatomy of team training, in L. Tobias and D. Fletcher (eds), Handbook on Research in Training (New York: Macmillan).
Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I., 1992. Toward an understanding of team performance & training. In R. W. Swezy & E. Salas (Eds.), Team: Their training & performance, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Salas E, Rosen MA, Burke CS, Goodwin GF., 2008. The wisdom of collective in organizations: An Update of the Teamwork Competencies. In: Salas E, Goodwin GF, Burke CS, editors. Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches.
Salk, J. E., and Arya, B. 2005. Social performance learning in Multinational Corporations: Multicultural Teams, their Social Capital and Use of Cross-Sector Alliances, Advances in International Management, 18, 189-207.
Scott, S.,&Bruce, R. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior:Apath model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.
Selznick, P., 1957, Leadership in administration
Tuckman, 1965. Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6): 384 -399.
Walter, F. and Bruch, H., 2008. The positive group affect spiral: a dynamic model of the emergence of positive affective similarity in work groups, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 239-261.
Watkins, K., & Marsick, V. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Weick, K. E. ,Roberts, K. H., 1993. Collective mind in organizations : heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38,357–381.
West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 355 – 387.
West, M.A., 2002. Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51:355-386.
West, M. A. and Farr, J. L., 1990. Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
管理碩士學程(AMBA)
94362007
99
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094362007
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 徐聯恩zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Hsu, Michael L. A.en_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 高長瑞zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Kao, Chung Ruien_US
dc.creator (作者) 高長瑞zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Kao, Chung Ruien_US
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 5-Oct-2011 14:34:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 5-Oct-2011 14:34:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-Oct-2011 14:34:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0094362007en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51232-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 管理碩士學程(AMBA)zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94362007zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 團隊已經是普遍存在於組織中的一種工作型式,探討團隊效能的歷程研究還相當不足,了解也不夠。此外,就組織創新理論,團隊創新是其中之關鍵,要如何增加團隊創新效能也是重要研究議題,團隊創新是團隊各種效能表現中的一種。本文便是以團隊創新來研究團隊歷程。
團隊效能文獻主要以團隊I-P-O為主要模型,團隊效能是團隊投入因素透過團隊歷程活動後的產出。團隊歷程是影響團隊效能之主要因素,但是過去對團隊歷程研究卻較限制於橫切面研究,多未能探討團隊歷程之變動性。經由文獻探討,發現團隊合作能耐研究可以幫助了解團隊歷程。所謂的團隊合作能耐是指團隊合作的知識、技巧、能力、和其他特徵(KSAOs),近期研究者如Ilgen et al.將團隊歷程三分為IM-Forming階段、MO-Functioning階段、OI-結束與下階段的循環,並歸納在不同歷程階段,有不同的主要團隊合作能耐因素,讓團隊歷程更清楚,但是Ilgen et al等研究者並未回答團隊創新歷程。因此,本研究是根據團隊效能、團隊創新文獻為基礎,將團隊創新二分為團隊創意和思考、團隊創新實現二個階段,並探討團隊合作能耐重要性在這二個歷程階段的變化比較。
研究結果得到,(1) 資訊交流和分享是被認為最重要的團隊合作能耐,團隊信心的重要性則最低;(2) 團隊合作能耐重要性的確在不同團隊創新階段會有不同;(3) 團隊信心、資訊交流和分享、團隊默契在團隊創意階段變得比較重要,團隊凝聚力、團隊學習和適應、團隊規範和共識則是在團隊創新階段變得比較重要。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節、研究背景與動機 1
第二節、研究目的 3
第三節、研究流程 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節、團隊效能影響因素 4
第二節、團隊歷程 10
第二節、團隊合作能耐 14
第三節、團隊創新 20
第三章 研究方法 26
第一節、研究架構 26
第二節、研究假設 27
第三節、問卷設計與變數衡量 33
第四節、資料分析方法 35
第四章 研究分析 41
第一節、研究樣本之敘述性統計及相關分析 41
第二節、團隊創意和思考階段之團隊能耐灰關聯分析 45
第三節、團隊創新實現階段之團隊能耐灰關聯分析 49
第四節、團隊創意和思考階段與團隊創新實現階段之比較 52
第五節、小結 55
第五章 結論與建議 58
第一節、研究結論 58
第二節、管理實務意涵 60
第三節、研究限制與未來研究建議 61
參考文獻 63
附錄一 68
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094362007en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 團隊創新zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 團隊歷程zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 團隊能耐zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Team innovationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Team processen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Teamwork competenceen_US
dc.title (題名) 團隊創新階段能耐因素之比較研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The research of teamwork competencies in team innovation processen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱皓政,2000,組織創新環境的概念建構與測量工具發展。國科會整合型計劃「創新與創造力-技術創造力的涵義與開發」研討會論文集(2000)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 紀乃文,2008,團隊情感氛圍形成的前因、情境調節及個人層次後果變項之研究,台北,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 莊立民,2002,組織創新模式建構與實證之研究---以台灣資訊電子業為立,台南,國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄧聚龍,2000,灰色系統理論與應用,台北︰高立圖書有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭伯壎,2005,華人組織行為研究的方向與策略:由西化到本土化。本土心理學研究,24期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王思峰、黃家齊、鄭俐敏,2002,團隊知識轉換與知識創造的實驗研究: 知識螺旋理論的驗證。管理與系統,9(1):29-60。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃敏萍,2000,跨功能任務團隊之結構與效能—任務特性與社會系絡之影響,台北:國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃敏萍、鄭伯壎,和王建忠,2003。轉型領導、團隊內互動、及團隊與成員效能:IPO模式之驗證。管理學報,20(3):397-427。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Amabile, T. M., 1988. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations, Research in organizational behavior, 10(1): 123-167.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M., 1996. Assessing the working environment for Creativity, Academy of Management Journal, 39(5): 1154-1184.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F., Beyond Task and Maintenance: Defining External Functions in Groups, Group & Organization Studies, 13(4), 468-494.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ancona, D. G. & Caldwell, D. F., 1992a. Bridging the boundary: External activity & performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4): 634-665.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ancona, D. G. & Caldwell, D. F., 1992b. Demography &design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3(3): 321-341.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Andrew, K.R. (1971), The Concept of Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. IL: Irwin Homewood.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Austin, J. R., 2003. Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 866-878.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bandura, A., Social Foundations of Through and Action : A social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall(1986).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, S., & Eisenhardt, K., 1995. Product development: Past research, present findings and future direction. Academy of Management Review, 20:343-378.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C., 1993. Relations between work group characteristics & effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46: 823-825.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., Medsker, G. J., 1996. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: a replication and extension. Personnel Psychology. 49: 429-452.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, eds. 1998. Making Decisions Under Stress: Implications for Individual and Team Training. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Tannenbaum, S.I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C.E., 1995. Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 333–380.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carron, A.V., 1982. Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123–138.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cartwright, D. and A. Zander (Eds.), Group Dynamics, (3rd Ed.), Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL, 1968.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E., 1997. What makes teams work? Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23: 239-290.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DiMasi J. A., Hansen, R. W. & Grabowski, H. G., 2003. The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. Journal of Health Economics, 22, 151–185zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Drucker, P. F., 1985, Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principleszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271–282.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Festinger,L.,Schachter,S.,Back,K.W.,1950.Social Pressures in Informal Groups:A Study of Human Factors in Housing. Harper,NewYork.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gladstein, D. L., 1984. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 499-517.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goodwin, G. F., Burke, C. S., Wildman, J. L. y Salas, E., 2008. Team effectiveness in complex organizations: An overview. En E. Salas, G.F. Goodwin y C.S. Burke (Eds.), Team Effectiveness in Complex Organizations. Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives and Approaches, New York: Psychology Press, 3-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gregorich, S. E., Helmreich, R. L., & Wilhelm, J. A., 1990. The structure of cockpit management attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 682-690.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Guzzo, R.A. & Dickson, M.W., 1996. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance & effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47: 307-338.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P., 1992. Group performance & Intergroup relations in organizations. In Handbook of Industrial &Organizational Psychology, ed. Dunnette, M. D., & Hough, L. M., 3:269–313. Palo Alto, CA: Consult Psychology Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hackman, J. R., 1990, Groups That Work (And Those That Do not): Creating Conditions for EVective Teamwork, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hackman, J. R., 1987. The design of work team. In J. W. Lorsh (Ed.) Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hareli, S., & Rafaeli, A., 2008. Emotion cycles: On the social influence of emotion in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 35-59.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., Jundt, D., 2005. TEAMS IN ORGANIZATIONS: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56:517-543.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there?: The implications of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14 (4), 29-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., Neale, M. A., 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 741-763zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jelinek, M. & Wilson, J. 2005. Macro Influences on Multicultural Teams. In: Shapiro, D.L., von Glionow, M.A. & Cheng, J.L.C (editors), Managing Multinational Teams: Global Perspectives, Amsterdam et al.: Elsevier: 209-231.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jelinek, M. & Wilson, J. 2005. Macro Influences on Multicultural Teams. In: Shapiro, D.L., von Glionow, M.A. & Cheng, J.L.C (editors), Managing Multinational Teams: Global Perspectives, Amsterdam et al.: Elsevier: 209-231.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jung, D. I., Sosik, J. J., 1999. Effects of group characteristics on work group performance: a longitudinal investigation. Group Dynamics. 3: 279-290.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Katzenbach, J. R. & Smith, D. K., 1995. The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, March-April: 111-120.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keller, R.T., 2001. Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44:547-555.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kirton, M. J., 1989. A theory of cognitive style. In M. J. Kirton (Ed.). Adaptors and innovators. Styles of creativity and problem-solving, London: Routledge, 1-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kleinman, D. L. and Serfaty, D., 1989, Team performance assessment in distributed decisionmaking, Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive Networked Simulation for Training , Orlando, 22-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Knight, D., Durham, C., & Locke, E. 2001. The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implementation, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 320-338.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kozlowski, S. W. J., 1998. Training and developing adaptive teams: theory, principles, and research. See Cannon-Bowers & Salas 1998, pp. 115–153.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., Smith, E. M., 1999. Developing adaptive teams: a theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In The Changing Nature of Performance, ed. DR Ilgen, ED Pulakos, pp. 240–92. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Basszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kozlowski, S. W. J. & Klein, K. J., 2000.  A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes.  In Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R., 2006. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams.  Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3): 77-124.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Leonard, D. and Sensiper, S., 1998. The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation, California Management Review, 40(3), 112-132.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lester, S. W., Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, M. A., 2002, The Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Longitudinal Investigation of Newly Formed Work Groups, Academy of Management, 45(2), 352-368.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lipnack, J. & Stamps, J., 1997. Virtual teams. In: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology, John Wiley & Sons, New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Little, B., & Madigan, R., 1997. The relationship between collective efficacy and performance in manufacturing work teams. Small Group Research, 28, 517-534.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lynn, G.S. & Akgun, A.E., 1998. Innovation Strategies Under uncertainty: A Contingency Approach for New Product Development, Engineering management Journal, 10(3), 11-17.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mansfield, E., 1991. Academic research and industrial innovation, Research Policy, 20, 1-12.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., &Zaccaro, S. J., 2001. A temporally based framework & taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26:356-765.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A., 2000. The influence of shared mental models on team process & performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2): 273-283.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McGrath, J.E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. NewYork: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McGrath, J. E., 1984. Groups: Interaction &performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Moreland, R. L., 1996. Lewin’s legacy for small groups research, Systems Practice, 9, 7–26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mullen, B., & Cooper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration, Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210–227.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nieva, V.F., Fleishman, E.A., & Reick, A., 1978. Team dimensions: Their identity, their measurement, and their relationships. Washington, DC: ARRO.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-creating company, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paris, C. R., Salas, E. and Cannon-Bowers, J. A., 2000. Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1052–1075.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel G., 1990, The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, May-June: 79-91.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Prussia, G.E., & Kinicki, A.J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 187–198.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ruffell-Smith, H. P., 1979, A Simulator Study of the Interaction of Pilot Workload with Errors. NASA technical report no. TM-78482 (MoVett Field: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Centre).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Salas, E. and Cannon-Bowers, J. A., 2000, The anatomy of team training, in L. Tobias and D. Fletcher (eds), Handbook on Research in Training (New York: Macmillan).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I., 1992. Toward an understanding of team performance & training. In R. W. Swezy & E. Salas (Eds.), Team: Their training & performance, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Salas E, Rosen MA, Burke CS, Goodwin GF., 2008. The wisdom of collective in organizations: An Update of the Teamwork Competencies. In: Salas E, Goodwin GF, Burke CS, editors. Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Salk, J. E., and Arya, B. 2005. Social performance learning in Multinational Corporations: Multicultural Teams, their Social Capital and Use of Cross-Sector Alliances, Advances in International Management, 18, 189-207.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scott, S.,&Bruce, R. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior:Apath model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Selznick, P., 1957, Leadership in administrationzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tuckman, 1965. Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6): 384 -399.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Walter, F. and Bruch, H., 2008. The positive group affect spiral: a dynamic model of the emergence of positive affective similarity in work groups, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 239-261.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Watkins, K., & Marsick, V. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Weick, K. E. ,Roberts, K. H., 1993. Collective mind in organizations : heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38,357–381.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 355 – 387.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) West, M.A., 2002. Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51:355-386.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) West, M. A. and Farr, J. L., 1990. Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategieszh_TW