| dc.contributor.advisor | 徐聯恩 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hsu, Michael L. A. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (作者) | 高長瑞 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (作者) | Kao, Chung Rui | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 高長瑞 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Kao, Chung Rui | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2010 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 5-十月-2011 14:34:06 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 5-十月-2011 14:34:06 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 5-十月-2011 14:34:06 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) | G0094362007 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51232 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 管理碩士學程(AMBA) | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 94362007 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 99 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 團隊已經是普遍存在於組織中的一種工作型式，探討團隊效能的歷程研究還相當不足，了解也不夠。此外，就組織創新理論，團隊創新是其中之關鍵，要如何增加團隊創新效能也是重要研究議題，團隊創新是團隊各種效能表現中的一種。本文便是以團隊創新來研究團隊歷程。 團隊效能文獻主要以團隊I-P-O為主要模型，團隊效能是團隊投入因素透過團隊歷程活動後的產出。團隊歷程是影響團隊效能之主要因素，但是過去對團隊歷程研究卻較限制於橫切面研究，多未能探討團隊歷程之變動性。經由文獻探討，發現團隊合作能耐研究可以幫助了解團隊歷程。所謂的團隊合作能耐是指團隊合作的知識、技巧、能力、和其他特徵(KSAOs)，近期研究者如Ilgen et al.將團隊歷程三分為IM-Forming階段、MO-Functioning階段、OI-結束與下階段的循環，並歸納在不同歷程階段，有不同的主要團隊合作能耐因素，讓團隊歷程更清楚，但是Ilgen et al等研究者並未回答團隊創新歷程。因此，本研究是根據團隊效能、團隊創新文獻為基礎，將團隊創新二分為團隊創意和思考、團隊創新實現二個階段，並探討團隊合作能耐重要性在這二個歷程階段的變化比較。 研究結果得到，(1) 資訊交流和分享是被認為最重要的團隊合作能耐，團隊信心的重要性則最低；(2) 團隊合作能耐重要性的確在不同團隊創新階段會有不同；(3) 團隊信心、資訊交流和分享、團隊默契在團隊創意階段變得比較重要，團隊凝聚力、團隊學習和適應、團隊規範和共識則是在團隊創新階段變得比較重要。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1 第一節、研究背景與動機 1 第二節、研究目的 3 第三節、研究流程 3第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節、團隊效能影響因素 4 第二節、團隊歷程 10 第二節、團隊合作能耐 14 第三節、團隊創新 20第三章 研究方法 26 第一節、研究架構 26 第二節、研究假設 27 第三節、問卷設計與變數衡量 33 第四節、資料分析方法 35第四章 研究分析 41 第一節、研究樣本之敘述性統計及相關分析 41 第二節、團隊創意和思考階段之團隊能耐灰關聯分析 45 第三節、團隊創新實現階段之團隊能耐灰關聯分析 49 第四節、團隊創意和思考階段與團隊創新實現階段之比較 52 第五節、小結 55第五章 結論與建議 58 第一節、研究結論 58 第二節、管理實務意涵 60 第三節、研究限制與未來研究建議 61參考文獻 63附錄一 68 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094362007 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 團隊創新 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 團隊歷程 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 團隊能耐 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Team innovation | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Team process | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Teamwork competence | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 團隊創新階段能耐因素之比較研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | The research of teamwork competencies in team innovation process | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 邱皓政，2000，組織創新環境的概念建構與測量工具發展。國科會整合型計劃「創新與創造力-技術創造力的涵義與開發」研討會論文集(2000)。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 紀乃文，2008，團隊情感氛圍形成的前因、情境調節及個人層次後果變項之研究，台北，國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 莊立民，2002，組織創新模式建構與實證之研究---以台灣資訊電子業為立，台南，國立成功大學企業管理研究所博士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄧聚龍，2000，灰色系統理論與應用，台北︰高立圖書有限公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄭伯壎，2005，華人組織行為研究的方向與策略：由西化到本土化。本土心理學研究，24期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王思峰、黃家齊、鄭俐敏，2002，團隊知識轉換與知識創造的實驗研究: 知識螺旋理論的驗證。管理與系統，9(1)：29-60。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃敏萍，2000，跨功能任務團隊之結構與效能—任務特性與社會系絡之影響，台北：國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃敏萍、鄭伯壎，和王建忠，2003。轉型領導、團隊內互動、及團隊與成員效能：IPO模式之驗證。管理學報，20(3)：397-427。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Amabile, T. M., 1988. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations, Research in organizational behavior, 10(1): 123-167. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M., 1996. Assessing the working environment for Creativity, Academy of Management Journal, 39(5): 1154-1184. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F., Beyond Task and Maintenance: Defining External Functions in Groups, Group & Organization Studies, 13(4), 468-494. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ancona, D. G. & Caldwell, D. F., 1992a. Bridging the boundary: External activity & performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4): 634-665. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ancona, D. G. & Caldwell, D. F., 1992b. Demography &design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3(3): 321-341. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Andrew, K.R. (1971), The Concept of Corporate Strategy: An Analytic Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. IL: Irwin Homewood. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Austin, J. R., 2003. Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 866-878. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bandura, A., Social Foundations of Through and Action : A social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall(1986). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brown, S., & Eisenhardt, K., 1995. Product development: Past research, present findings and future direction. Academy of Management Review, 20:343-378. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C., 1993. Relations between work group characteristics & effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46: 823-825. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., Medsker, G. J., 1996. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: a replication and extension. Personnel Psychology. 49: 429-452. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, eds. 1998. Making Decisions Under Stress: Implications for Individual and Team Training. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Tannenbaum, S.I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C.E., 1995. Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 333–380. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carron, A.V., 1982. Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123–138. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cartwright, D. and A. Zander (Eds.), Group Dynamics, (3rd Ed.), Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL, 1968. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E., 1997. What makes teams work? Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23: 239-290. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | DiMasi J. A., Hansen, R. W. & Grabowski, H. G., 2003. The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. Journal of Health Economics, 22, 151–185 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Drucker, P. F., 1985, Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271–282. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Festinger,L.,Schachter,S.,Back,K.W.,1950.Social Pressures in Informal Groups:A Study of Human Factors in Housing. Harper,NewYork. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gladstein, D. L., 1984. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 499-517. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goodwin, G. F., Burke, C. S., Wildman, J. L. y Salas, E., 2008. Team effectiveness in complex organizations: An overview. En E. Salas, G.F. Goodwin y C.S. Burke (Eds.), Team Effectiveness in Complex Organizations. Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives and Approaches, New York: Psychology Press, 3-16. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gregorich, S. E., Helmreich, R. L., & Wilhelm, J. A., 1990. The structure of cockpit management attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 682-690. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Guzzo, R.A. & Dickson, M.W., 1996. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance & effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47: 307-338. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P., 1992. Group performance & Intergroup relations in organizations. In Handbook of Industrial &Organizational Psychology, ed. Dunnette, M. D., & Hough, L. M., 3:269–313. Palo Alto, CA: Consult Psychology Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hackman, J. R., 1990, Groups That Work (And Those That Do not): Creating Conditions for EVective Teamwork, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hackman, J. R., 1987. The design of work team. In J. W. Lorsh (Ed.) Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hareli, S., & Rafaeli, A., 2008. Emotion cycles: On the social influence of emotion in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 35-59. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., Jundt, D., 2005. TEAMS IN ORGANIZATIONS: From Input-Process-Output Models to IMOI Models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56:517-543. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there?: The implications of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14 (4), 29-64. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., Neale, M. A., 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 741-763 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jelinek, M. & Wilson, J. 2005. Macro Influences on Multicultural Teams. In: Shapiro, D.L., von Glionow, M.A. & Cheng, J.L.C (editors), Managing Multinational Teams: Global Perspectives, Amsterdam et al.: Elsevier: 209-231. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jelinek, M. & Wilson, J. 2005. Macro Influences on Multicultural Teams. In: Shapiro, D.L., von Glionow, M.A. & Cheng, J.L.C (editors), Managing Multinational Teams: Global Perspectives, Amsterdam et al.: Elsevier: 209-231. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jung, D. I., Sosik, J. J., 1999. Effects of group characteristics on work group performance: a longitudinal investigation. Group Dynamics. 3: 279-290. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Katzenbach, J. R. & Smith, D. K., 1995. The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, March-April: 111-120. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Keller, R.T., 2001. Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44:547-555. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kirton, M. J., 1989. A theory of cognitive style. In M. J. Kirton (Ed.). Adaptors and innovators. Styles of creativity and problem-solving, London: Routledge, 1-36. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kleinman, D. L. and Serfaty, D., 1989, Team performance assessment in distributed decisionmaking, Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive Networked Simulation for Training , Orlando, 22-27. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Knight, D., Durham, C., & Locke, E. 2001. The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implementation, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 320-338. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kozlowski, S. W. J., 1998. Training and developing adaptive teams: theory, principles, and research. See Cannon-Bowers & Salas 1998, pp. 115–153. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E. R., Smith, E. M., 1999. Developing adaptive teams: a theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In The Changing Nature of Performance, ed. DR Ilgen, ED Pulakos, pp. 240–92. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kozlowski, S. W. J. & Klein, K. J., 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R., 2006. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3): 77-124. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Leonard, D. and Sensiper, S., 1998. The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation, California Management Review, 40(3), 112-132. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lester, S. W., Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, M. A., 2002, The Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Longitudinal Investigation of Newly Formed Work Groups, Academy of Management, 45(2), 352-368. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lipnack, J. & Stamps, J., 1997. Virtual teams. In: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology, John Wiley & Sons, New York. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Little, B., & Madigan, R., 1997. The relationship between collective efficacy and performance in manufacturing work teams. Small Group Research, 28, 517-534. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lynn, G.S. & Akgun, A.E., 1998. Innovation Strategies Under uncertainty: A Contingency Approach for New Product Development, Engineering management Journal, 10(3), 11-17. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mansfield, E., 1991. Academic research and industrial innovation, Research Policy, 20, 1-12. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., &Zaccaro, S. J., 2001. A temporally based framework & taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26:356-765. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A., 2000. The influence of shared mental models on team process & performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2): 273-283. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McGrath, J.E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. NewYork: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McGrath, J. E., 1984. Groups: Interaction &performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Moreland, R. L., 1996. Lewin’s legacy for small groups research, Systems Practice, 9, 7–26. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mullen, B., & Cooper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration, Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210–227. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nieva, V.F., Fleishman, E.A., & Reick, A., 1978. Team dimensions: Their identity, their measurement, and their relationships. Washington, DC: ARRO. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-creating company, N.Y.: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Paris, C. R., Salas, E. and Cannon-Bowers, J. A., 2000. Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1052–1075. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel G., 1990, The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, May-June: 79-91. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Prussia, G.E., & Kinicki, A.J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 187–198. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ruffell-Smith, H. P., 1979, A Simulator Study of the Interaction of Pilot Workload with Errors. NASA technical report no. TM-78482 (MoVett Field: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Centre). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Salas, E. and Cannon-Bowers, J. A., 2000, The anatomy of team training, in L. Tobias and D. Fletcher (eds), Handbook on Research in Training (New York: Macmillan). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I., 1992. Toward an understanding of team performance & training. In R. W. Swezy & E. Salas (Eds.), Team: Their training & performance, Norwood, NJ: Ablex. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Salas E, Rosen MA, Burke CS, Goodwin GF., 2008. The wisdom of collective in organizations: An Update of the Teamwork Competencies. In: Salas E, Goodwin GF, Burke CS, editors. Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Salk, J. E., and Arya, B. 2005. Social performance learning in Multinational Corporations: Multicultural Teams, their Social Capital and Use of Cross-Sector Alliances, Advances in International Management, 18, 189-207. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Scott, S.,&Bruce, R. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior:Apath model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Selznick, P., 1957, Leadership in administration | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tuckman, 1965. Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6): 384 -399. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Walter, F. and Bruch, H., 2008. The positive group affect spiral: a dynamic model of the emergence of positive affective similarity in work groups, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 239-261. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Watkins, K., & Marsick, V. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Weick, K. E. ,Roberts, K. H., 1993. Collective mind in organizations : heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38,357–381. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 355 – 387. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | West, M.A., 2002. Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51:355-386. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | West, M. A. and Farr, J. L., 1990. Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies | zh_TW |
