| dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡錚雲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 沈宏達 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 沈宏達 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2010 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 5-Oct-2011 14:35:49 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 5-Oct-2011 14:35:49 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 5-Oct-2011 14:35:49 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0095154007 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51268 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 95154007 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 99 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 當代哲學家紀傑克以他對於政治與文化現象的拉岡式解讀而聞名，但他哲學中的核心母題是什麼？對紀傑克而言，哲學不是使人「安然棲身」的論述，而是跟陌生感與他異性更緊密相關。所以，在紀傑克的眼中，哲學家的工作，不在於提供具體的解決方案，而是在於「新問題的創造」，重塑爭論的框架本身。 這篇研究中，筆者使用「系統與他者」這組概念，來彰顯紀傑克的兩大核心母題，其一，便是在有限性的範圍之內主張的自由，其二，則是他對新穎與變化的追索。「他者」使得系統能夠不斷重新定向，並向根本的變化保持開放。 「脫節狀態」是紀傑克用以描述主體之基本自由的概念。主體活動不被自然或文化的任一方決定；於是，所有主體所作的系統整合，都是一種與他者建立暫態平衡的嘗試，而所有用以整合的意指活動，都是一種對於他異性的回應，一種安身立命的奠基姿態。 簡言之，所謂「象徵界與實在界的不協調性」，在紀傑克的術語中不是消極的意涵，而是積極的意涵：它使得意義建構得以開始，並且是人類自由的根源。透過「系統」與「他者」的互動，思想總是有能力重新定向，藉此維持其鮮活與彈性，而這正是紀傑克式主體在現今政治情境中所致力實現的。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Contemporary philosopher Slavoj Žižek is well-known for his Lacanian reading on political and cultural phenomena, but what is the central motif of his philosophy? For Žižek, philosophy is not some discourse to make people feel “being at home”, but rather something more related to foreignness and otherness. In Žižek’s eyes, What a philosopher really does is not providing substantial solutions, but rather “inventing new problems”, reshaping the framework of argumentation itself. In this thesis, ”System and other” is the term I introduce to thematize two central motifs in Žižek’s philosophy: the first motif is his tireless assertion of freedom within the realm of finitude, and the second one is his relentless seeking for innovations and changes. “Other” is what enables the system to continuously re-orientate itself, and keep the system open to fundamental changes. Žižek uses “Out-of-jointedness” to describe the fundamental freedom of the subject, neither nature nor culture can determine the subject. Every system organized by the subject is an attempt to create a transient balance with the other, and every totalizing signification is s a response to the otherness, the founding gesture of situating the subject itself into a meaningful context. To sum up, Žižek does not use “Inconsistency between the Symbolic and the Real” as a negative term, but rather a positive term, it is the very starting point of meaning construction, and the ground for human freedom. Through the interaction between ”system and other”, the thought is always ready for re-orientation, therefore the thought is kept alive and flexible, and this is exactly what a Žižekian subject wants to accomplish in the present political situations. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 導論 1 第一節、筆者之思考母題 1 第二節、紀傑克哲學之他異性精神 2 第三節、紀傑克之文字風格與其批判性 4 第四節.、本文題目與重點概念概述 8 第五節、章節編排方式 9 第一章、紀傑克：精神分析與主體哲學的交界 10 第一節、紀傑克之學思概述 10 第二節、以拉岡精神分析重返我思概念，抵抗後現代對主體消解之宣稱 11 第三節、先驗物質論之基本主張 15 第二章、紀傑克對拉岡的理論繼承 17 第一節、反整體性之理論傾向：親異性（ex-timacy） 17 第二節、紀傑克的主要分析工具：拉岡的三界結概念 19 第三節、象徵界與實在界的糾纏 20 第四節、作為建構現實之意義可欲望性的幻想概念 22 第五節、慾望活動與對象：小寫客體與具體對象的隱密相連24 第六節、哲學與精神分析：主體與死亡驅力的關連27 第三章、自由與有限性的內在聯繫：主體與世界的共在結構 28 第一節、有限性：自由主體成立之積極條件 28 第二節、脫節於環境的主體 31 第三節、知性判斷早已在經驗之中 32 第四節、自我不透明性：作為我思的存在條件35 第五節、紀傑克主體論對其他立場之回應 38 A. 對傳統觀念論與唯物論的回應 38 B. 對認知主義的回應 39 第四章、主體的被動性與過剩層面 42 第一節、主體的被動層面：客體對主體的激擾 42 第二節、主體的過剩層面 45 A. 死亡驅力：作為自然與文化的居間者 45 B. 小寫客體作為內在他異性 46 第三節、拉岡式主體 49 第五章、我思與無意識的內在連繫 50 第一節、語言：在人與世界之間 50 第二節、語言作為系統： 50 A. 結構語言學中的系統區辨性 50 B. 拉岡的符號機制 52 I. 縫合點（point de capiton） 52 II. 言說活動與言說內容的分立 53 III. 徵狀（Symptom）：非意識所主導的訊息表露 54 第三節、語言作為象徵界：大寫他者的不完備性 55 第四節、語言作為律法：他律是自律得以成立之積極條件 56 第五節、語言作為慾望之要件：欲望是朝向他者的慾望 58 第六章、壓抑：無意識的行動，進入世界的決斷 59 第一節、主體的傲慢：與底基之脫節 59 第二節、主體與世界的共在聯繫是否被絕對化？ 61 第三節、拉岡對伊底帕斯情結的重新刻劃 63 第四節、拉岡精神疾病臨床結構：慾望之基本型態 63 第五節、原初的決斷與分化：自由的無意識行動 64 附釋：第三章至第六章內容之小結 67 第七章、紀傑克於現今情境中的哲學任務 68 第一節、紀傑克的批評對象 69 A. 後現代之主體消解論 69 B. 現代之多元文化，身分政治學 70 C. 資本主義與自由民主典範 72 第二節、紀傑克主體論中的政治革命：大寫行動 76 總結 81 參考書目 83 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095154007 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 紀傑克 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 拉岡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 強斯頓 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 系統與他者 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 象徵界與實在界 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 幻想與現實 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 脫節狀態 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 先驗物質論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Slavoj Žižek | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Jacques Lacan | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Adrian Johnston | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | System and other | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Symbolic and Real | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | fantasy and reality | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | out-of-jointedness | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | transcendental materialism | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 如鯁在喉 － 紀傑克論象徵界與實在界的不協調性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | A Bone in the Throat － Žižek on Inconsistency between the Symbolic and the Real | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 參考書目 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 杜聲鋒（1988）。拉康結構主義精神分析學，台北：遠流。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Badiou, A. (2009). Theory of the subject. London: Continuum. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Badiou, A., Žižek, S., & Engelmann, P. (2009). Philosophy in the present. Cambridge: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Polity. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bird, G. (2006). A companion to Kant. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Butler, Rex. (2005). Slavoj Žižek : Live theory. New York : Continuum. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Evans, D. (1996). An introductory dictionary of Lacanian psychoanalysis. London: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Johnston, A. (2005). Time driven: Metapsychology and the splitting of the drive. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Johnston, A. (2009). Badiou, Žižek, and political transformations: The cadence of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | change. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Johnston, Adrian.（2008）. Žižek `s Ontology : A Transcendental Materialist Theory of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Subjectivity. Evanston, Ill. : Northwestern University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lacan, J., & Fink, B. (2006). Ecrits: The first complete edition in English. New York: | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | W.W. Norton & Co. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Meillassoux, Q. (2008). After finitude: An essay on the necessity of contingency. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | London: Continuum. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rabate, Jean-Michel. (ed). (2003). The Cambridge companion to Lacan. Cambridge, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | U.K. ; New York : Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wright, Elizabeth. & Wright, Edmond (eds). (1999). The Žižek Reader. Oxford, UK ; | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Malden, MA : Blackwell Publishers. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek Slavoj.（1991）. For They Know Not What They Do : Enjoyment as a Political | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Factor. London ; New York : Verso. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek, Slavoj. & Daly, Glyn（2004）. Conversations with Žižek. Cambridge, UK : | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Polity ; Malden, MA : Distributed in the USA by Blackwell Pub. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek, Slavoj. (ed). (1998). Cogito and the Unconscious. Durham, NC : Duke University | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek, Slavoj. (ed). (2003). Jacques Lacan : Critical Evaluation in Cultural Theory. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | London: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek, Slavoj.（1989）. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London ; New York : Verso. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek, Slavoj.（1991）. Looking Awry : An Introduction to Jacques Lacan Through | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Popular Culture. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek, Slavoj.（1992）. Enjoy Your Symptom! : Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and out. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 84 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | New York : Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek, Slavoj.（1993）. Tarrying with the Negative : Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ideology. Durham : Duke University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek, Slavoj.（1994）. The Metastases of Enjoyment : Six Essays on Woman and | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Causality. London ; New York : Verso. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek, Slavoj.（1996）. The Indivisible Remainder : on Schelling and Related Matters. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | London ; New York : Verso. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek, Slavoj.（1997）. The Plague of Fantasies. London ; New York : Verso. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek, Slavoj.（1999）. The Ticklish Subject : the Absent Centre of Political Ontology. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | London ; New York : Verso. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek, Slavoj（. 2003）. Organs Without Bodies : Deleuze and Consequences. London ; | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | New York : Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek, Slavoj.（2006）. Lacan : the Silent Partners. London ; New York : Verso. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek, Slavoj.（2006）. The Parallax View. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek, Slavoj.（2007）. How to Read Lacan. New York : W.W. Norton & Co. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zupančič, A., & Žižek, S. (2000). Ethics of the real: Kant, Lacan. London: Verso. | zh_TW |
