| dc.contributor.advisor | 林從一 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 唐孝儀 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Tang, Hsiao Yi | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 唐孝儀 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Tang, Hsiao Yi | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2010 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 5-Oct-2011 14:35:53 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 5-Oct-2011 14:35:53 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 5-Oct-2011 14:35:53 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0096154013 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51271 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 96154013 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 99 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 心靈範圍在哪裡？以往我們討論心靈議題時，不外乎都是將心靈視為存在於體表之內的一種實體、一種器官或是一種功能，例如：靈魂、大腦、又或者是指包含大腦與所有在體表之內的神經系統。但是，Andy Clark與David Chalmers告訴我們在某些情況下，心靈是可以超越體表而存在的，心靈的界限不是我們的體表；這個立場被我們稱為「外在論」或是「展延心靈觀」。對照於Clark與Chalmers的立場，以往將體表視為心靈界限的立場就被統稱為「內在論」。 本篇論文以Clark與Chalmers於1998年發表的文章“The Extended Mind”為主，透過介紹展延心靈觀的發展背景聚焦於展延心靈觀的主要論點，並且根據Frederick Adams與Kenneth Aizawa對展延心靈觀的批評及Clark、Richard Menary等人所提出的回應讓我們對於展延心靈觀有更深入的討論與理解。最後，由Clark與Chalmers所提到的「社會性的展延心靈（socially extended mind）」回到語言與心靈的討論，透過Clark曾多次在文章與著作中提到俄國語言及心理學家Lev Semenovich Vygotsky的語言理論，試圖連結Clark與Chalmers的主動外在論與Putnam和Burge的傳統外在論，並且進一步地思考展延心靈觀發展性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 導論………………………………………………………………………1一、展延心靈觀的發展背景……………………………………………51.1 內在論與外在論之爭 －61.2 心靈的處所 －121.3 體現性、崁進性、互涉性與展延性 －201.4 總結 －27二、印加、奧圖與展延的心靈…………………………………………28 2.1 印加－奧圖思想實驗 －28 2.2 動態的雙向認知系統 －33 2.3 平等原則 －38 2.4 總結 －43三、展延心靈觀的合理性：Adams、Aizawa的批評與Clark的回應…45 3.1 連結－構成謬誤 －45 3.2 信賴條件 －51 3.3 非衍生性的內容 －56 3.4 總結 －61四、展延心靈的展延……………………………………………………63 4.1 社會性的展延心靈 －64 4.2 總結 －69結論………………………………………………………………………70參考文獻…………………………………………………………………72 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096154013 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 展延心靈觀 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 外在論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 主動外在論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 動態系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 同等原則 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 鷹架理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | the extended mind | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | externalism | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | active externalism | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | dynamic system | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | parity principle | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | scaffolding theory | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 展延心靈觀 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | On the extended mind | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Adams, F. and Aizawa, K. (2007/2010) “Defending the Bounds of Cognition,” in M. Richard (ed.) The Extended Mind, MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Adams, F. and Aizawa, K. (2009) “Why the Mind Is Still in the Head,” in R. Philip and Murat Aydede (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, Cambridge Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Adams, F. and Aizawa, K. (2008) The Bounds of Cognition, Wiley-Blackwell. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Burge, T. (1979) ‘From “Individualism and the Mental”,’ in P. Andrew and Sanford Goldberg (eds.) The Twin Earth Chronicles, M.E. Sharpe. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carruthers, P. (2004) The Nature of the Mind, Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Clark, A. (2010) “Coupling, Constitution, and the Cognitive Kind: A Reply to Adams and Aizawa,” in M. Richard (ed.) The Extended Mind, MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Clark, A. (2008) Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension, Oxford University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Clark, A. (2007) “Coupling, Emergence and Explanation,” in Schouten, M. and Huibert Looren de Jong (eds.) The Matter of Mind, Blackwell. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Clark, A. (2005/2010) “Memento’s Revenge: The Extended Mind, Extended,” in M. Richard, The Extended Mind, MIT Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Clark, A. (2001) Mindware: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Cognitive Science, Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Clark, A. (1995) “Moving Minds: Situating Content in the Service of Real-Time Success,” Philosophical Perspectives: AI, Connectionism, and Philosophical Psychology, vol. 9, 89-104. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. (1998) “The Extended Mind,” Analysis 58, 10-23; reprinted in Clark’s Supersizing the Mind, 220-32 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chalmers, D. (2008) "Foreword," in A. Clark, Supersizing the Mind, Oxford University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cole, D. (2009) “The Chinese Room Argument,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-room/#5.3) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Descartes, R. The Philosophical Writing of Descartes [3 vols], J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch and [vol. 3 only] A. Kenny (trans.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984-91), vol. 1: 208. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Descartes, R. Meditations on First Philosophy in Essential Squashed Philosophers, ed. Glyn Lloyd-Hughes, (USA: Tomato Press, 2009), http://www.btinternet.com/~glynhughes/squashed/descartes.htm. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Flanagan, O. (2009) “Where in the World is the Mind?” New Scientist, 2691, 44-46 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gertler, B. (2007) “Overextending the Mind?” in B. Gertler and L. Shapiro (eds.) Arguing about the Mind, Routledge | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Giere, R. (2002) “Scientific Cognition as Distributed Cognition,” in Carruthers, P., Stephen Stich and Michael Siegal (eds.) The Cognition Basis of Science, Cambridge | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Haugeland, J. (1998) “Mind Embodied and Embedded,” in his Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind, Harvard University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hurley, S. (1998) “Introduction,” in her Consciousness in Action, Harvard University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jacob, P. (2006) “Why Visual Experience Is Likely to Resist Being Enacted,” Psyche 12 (1), 1-12. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kim, J. (2003) Philosophy of mind, Westview Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kiverstein, J. and Clark, A. (2009) “Mind Embodied, Embedded, Enacted: One Church or many?” Topoi 28, 1-7 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lau, J. and Deutsch, M. (2008) “Externalism and Mental Content,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Levy, N. (2007) “Introduction,” in his Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lycan, W. (1999) “Introduction” in William G. Lycan, Mind and Cognition: An Anthology, Blackwell Publishing. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | MacKay, D. M. (1991), Behind the Eye, The Gifford Lectures, ed. Valerie MacKay (Oxford: Blackwell) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Maslin, K. (2007) An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind, Polity Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Menary, R. (2007) Cognitive Integration: Mind and Cognition Unbounded, Palgrave Macmillan | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Menary, R. (2009) “Intentionality, Cognitive Integration and the Continuity Thesis,” Topoi 28, 31-43 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Menary, R. (2010) The Extended Mind, MIT Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Murphy, N. and Brown, W. (2007) Did My Neurons Make Me Do It?, Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Noë, A. (2004) Action in Perception, MIT Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Noë, A. (2006) “Experience without the Head,” in T. S. Gendler and J. Hawthorne (eds.) Perceptual Experience, Oxford University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | O’Brien, G. (1998) “The Mind: Embodied, Embedded, but not Extended,” Metascience 7, 78-83 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Putnam, H. (1973) “Meaning and Reference,” The Journal of Philosophy LXX, 19 Nov.8, 699-711. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Putnam, H. (1975/1996) “The Meaning of Meaning,” in P. Andrew and Sanford Goldberg (eds.) The Twin Earth Chronicles, M.E. Sharpe. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schneider, S. (2009) “ Identity Theory,” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Searle, J. (1984) Mind, Brains and Science, Havard Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Smart, J.J.C. (2007) “The Identity Theory of Mind,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Smart, J.J.C. (1995) “Mind and Brain,” in Chard, W. and Tadeusz Szubka (eds.) The Mind-Body Problem, USA: Basil Blackwell Ltd. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rowlands, M. (2009) “Enactivism and the Extended Mind,” Topoi 28, 53-62 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rowlands, M. (2003) “Vehicle Externalism,” in his Externalism: Putting Mind and World Back Together again, McGill-Queen’s university Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rupert, R. (2009) Cognitive Systems and the Extended Mind, Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Varela, F., Thompson, E. and Rosch, E. (1999) The Embodied Mind, The MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Plato著，王曉朝譯，《柏拉圖全集》卷二，克拉底魯篇(Cratylus)，台北：左岸文化，民92，p.75-76。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Plato著，王曉朝譯，《柏拉圖全集》卷一，美諾篇(Meno)與斐多篇(Pheado)，台北：左岸文化，民92。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lev Semenovich Vygotsky著，李維譯，《思維與語言》，台北：昭明出版社，民89。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 方萬全（2004），〈約翰．舍爾論「背景」與實在論〉，《歐美研究》第三十四卷第三期，頁431-456。 | zh_TW |
