Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 從優選理論分析華語擬聲詞結構
An optimality theory analysis of Mandarin onomatopoeia
作者 葉雯琪
Yeh, Wenchi
貢獻者 蕭宇超
Hsiao, Yuchau E.
葉雯琪
Yeh, Wenchi
關鍵詞 華語音韻
優選理論
擬聲詞
重疊
Mandarin phonology
Optimality Theory
Onomatopoeia
Reduplication
日期 2010
上傳時間 5-Oct-2011 14:38:56 (UTC+8)
摘要 本計畫擬於優選理論 (Prince & Smolensky 1993/2004) 框架下,探討現代華語擬聲詞在音韻上的特點與表現,並分析優選理如何論操作單音節及雙音節輸入項所衍生出的雙音節擬聲詞,進而完全或部分重疊成三音節及四音節華語擬聲詞。擬聲詞為模仿自然界中的聲音形成的詞彙,但並非隨意衍生形成,仍然需要遵循語言的構詞及音韻規律,才能衍生成為合法詞彙並順暢地使用。在華語音韻研究方面,歷來學者對於擬聲詞的討論並不豐富詳盡,因此本碩士論文便嘗試探討華語雙音節、三音節及四音節擬聲詞在音韻分析中的樣貌。
重疊在漢語擬聲詞中為極為常見的現象。如現代華語中單音節的「咕」與雙音節的「咕咕」;雙音節的「滴答」與四音節的「滴滴答答」。故擬聲詞衍生中的重疊機制為本計畫中主要討論議題,此外由於華語擬聲詞結構在音段選擇中展現一致性,故另聚焦於固定音段, 如邊音/l/及前元音/i/在現代華語擬聲詞中高度頻繁地出現,我將對其起源提出假設並分析,如現代華語「劈哩啪啦」的/l/及/i/。而華語雙音節擬聲詞的來源二分為單音節輸入項及雙音節輸入項亦為討論對象。
最後預期華語擬聲詞大致符合現代華語成詞的語法,但進行重疊時與實詞相異,語意因素不會成為衍生動機;經由優選理論分析,從音韻結構角度切入,不僅可了解華語擬聲詞衍生的制約排序,亦更加了解其音韻構詞規範,且與實詞如形容詞進行重疊時的制約排序進行比較,說明華語擬聲詞在衍生過程中傾向遵循邊緣音韻規則,與其他實詞多依據核心音韻 規則的狀況大異其趣。以此為基石去了解其他漢語方言對於擬聲成詞的標準,甚或研究日語、韓語中豐富的擬聲詞,便能構擬出擬聲成詞更具體且具有說服力的語法規則。
In this thesis, the generation of Modern Mandarin disyllabic, trisyllabic and quadrisyllabic onomatopoeia under phonological viewpoint via Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky 1993/2004) approach will be discussed. In my M.A. Thesis ‘An OT analysis of Mandarin Onomatopoeia’, four factors motivated this study. First, the different sources of Mandarin disyllabic onomatopoeia which I thought there are monosyllabic and disyllabic inputs aroused my interests. Second, there are some similarities of Mandarin onomatopoeia between Mandarin core lexicons. Third, the reduplication mechanism in Mandarin onomatopoeia will be taken as a main point in this study. For example, in Modern Mandarin ‘gu’ (Sound of bird sing once) will extend into ‘gugu’ (Sound of birdsong) under total reduplication. Finally, the issue concerning what will be the best choice when Mandarin onomatopoeia is reduplicated with fixed segmentism also plays an important role in this study. For instance, the /l/ and /i/ in Modern Mandarin’s ‘pilipala’ (Sound of many things falling).
Onomatopoeias have their special function as sound-imitating icons. They are not the words which are formed by arbitrary but by the rules. They sometimes violate phonological structures of the language in which they occur; hence they belong to the peripheral phonology rather than core one. The Mandarin onomatopoeia is different from Mandarin content words; they are not motivated by semantic factors. So the Chinese onomatopoeia generation analysis via OT approach supplies not only the morpho-phonological constraints but also the comparison of peripheral words between content words. I would like to assume that the Mandarin onomatopoeia generation follows the peripheral phonological rules. This study will provide as a basement to study on other Chinese language’s onomatopoeia or even onomatopoeia in Tibetan, Japanese and Korean.
參考文獻 Alderete, John et al. 1999. “Reduplication with Fixed Segmentism”. Linguistics Inquiry, Volume 30, Number 3: 327- 364.
Anttila, Arto. 1997. ‘Deriving variation from grammar’, in Frans Hinskens, Roeland van Hout and Leo Wetzels, (eds.), Variation, Change and Phonological Theory, John Benjamins, Amsterdam / Philadelphia, pp. 35-68.
Chao, Y.-R. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkely: University of California Press.
Chen, Lu. 2007. Double Doubling in Disyllables – Reduplication in Mandarin. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Shanghai International Studies.
Chiang, Wen-yu. 1992. The Prosodic Morphology and Phonology of Affixation in Taiwanese and Other Chinese Languages. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Delaware.
Duanmu, San. 2007. The Phonology of Standard Chinese. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press.
Duanmu, San, 2000. “Hanyu de jiezou [Prodosy in Chinese]”. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics] 4: 203-209.
Katamba, Francis. 1989 An Introduction to Phonology, London ; New York : Longman.
Inkelas, Sharon, and Cheryl Zoll. 2007. “Is grammar dependence real? A comparison between cophonological and indexed constraint approaches to morphonolically conditioned phonology.” Linguistics. 45.1: 133-171.
Katamba, Francis. 1993. Morphology. New York: St. Martin`s Press.
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass. : Blackwell
Kitto, Catherine and Paul de Lacy. 1999. “A correspondence theory of epenthetic quality”. In Catherine Kitto and Carolyn Smallwood (eds.) Proceedings of AFLA (Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association) VI. Toronto: Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, pp.181‐200.
[Rutgers Optimality Archive#337
Lien, C.-F.1989. “Antonymous Quadrinominals in Chinese”. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 17, 263-206.
Lombardi, Linda. 2002. “Coronal epenthesis and markedness.” Phonology, 19: 219-251
Lombardi, Linda. 2003. “Markedness and the typology of epenthetic vowels.” University of Maryland, unpublished manuscript. ROA -578
Lunden, S.L.Anya. 2004. “Reduplicant Placement, Achoring and Locality.” ROA-608, 1 – 18.
McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1993a. “Generalized Alignment.” Yearbook of Morphology, ed. G.E. and J. van Marle, 79 – 153. Kluwer.
McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1993b. “Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction.” Technical Reports of Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, No. 3. 26
McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1994a. “The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology”. Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 24
McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1994b. “Prosodic Morphology”. A Handbook of Phonological Theory.
McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1995a. “Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity”.University of Massachusetts Occasional Paper in Linfuistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, ed. by Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey and Suzanne Urbanzyk, 249-384
McCarthy, John J. and Alan Prince. 1995b. Prosodic morphology. The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. by John Goldsmith, 318-366. Oxford: Blackwell.
McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1999. “Faithfulness and Identity in Prosodic Morphology” The Prosody-morphology Interface, ed. by Rene Kager, Harry van der Hulst, and Wim Zonneveld, 218-309.
McCarthy, John J. 2008. Doing Optimality Theory: Applying Theory to Data. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell
Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1996. Sign-Based Morphology and Phonology with special attention to Optimality Theory, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley, ROA-171.
Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University
Tang, T.-C. 1988. “Hanyu Cifa Jufa Lunji [Studies on Chinese Morphology and Syntax]”. Taipei, Taiwan: Student Bokk Co. Ltd.
Yip, Moira. 2001. “Segmental Unmarkedness versus Input preservation in Reduplication.” in L. Limbardi, ed. Segmental Phonology in Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press. pp 206-230.
王洪君,2008,《漢語非線性音系學》,北京,北京大學出版社。
李方桂,2003,《上古音研究》,北京,商務印書館。
李鏡兒 ,2007,《現代漢語擬聲詞研究》。中國:上海出版社。
竺家寧,1995,<論擬聲詞聲音結構中的邊音成分>,《國立中正大學學報人文分冊》。
竺家寧,2007,《聲韻學》,台北,五南出版社。
林 尹,1971,《文字學概說》,台北,正中書局。
林語堂,1998,<古有複輔音說>,《古漢語複聲母論文集》。
馬慶株,2002,〈擬聲詞研究〉,《著名中年語言學家自選集‧馬慶株卷》,安徽,安徽教育出版
馮勝利,2005,《漢語韻律語法研究》,北京,北京大學出版社。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
華語文教學碩士學位學程
97161007
99
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097161007
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蕭宇超zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Hsiao, Yuchau E.en_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 葉雯琪zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Yeh, Wenchien_US
dc.creator (作者) 葉雯琪zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Yeh, Wenchien_US
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 5-Oct-2011 14:38:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 5-Oct-2011 14:38:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-Oct-2011 14:38:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0097161007en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51298-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 華語文教學碩士學位學程zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97161007zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本計畫擬於優選理論 (Prince & Smolensky 1993/2004) 框架下,探討現代華語擬聲詞在音韻上的特點與表現,並分析優選理如何論操作單音節及雙音節輸入項所衍生出的雙音節擬聲詞,進而完全或部分重疊成三音節及四音節華語擬聲詞。擬聲詞為模仿自然界中的聲音形成的詞彙,但並非隨意衍生形成,仍然需要遵循語言的構詞及音韻規律,才能衍生成為合法詞彙並順暢地使用。在華語音韻研究方面,歷來學者對於擬聲詞的討論並不豐富詳盡,因此本碩士論文便嘗試探討華語雙音節、三音節及四音節擬聲詞在音韻分析中的樣貌。
重疊在漢語擬聲詞中為極為常見的現象。如現代華語中單音節的「咕」與雙音節的「咕咕」;雙音節的「滴答」與四音節的「滴滴答答」。故擬聲詞衍生中的重疊機制為本計畫中主要討論議題,此外由於華語擬聲詞結構在音段選擇中展現一致性,故另聚焦於固定音段, 如邊音/l/及前元音/i/在現代華語擬聲詞中高度頻繁地出現,我將對其起源提出假設並分析,如現代華語「劈哩啪啦」的/l/及/i/。而華語雙音節擬聲詞的來源二分為單音節輸入項及雙音節輸入項亦為討論對象。
最後預期華語擬聲詞大致符合現代華語成詞的語法,但進行重疊時與實詞相異,語意因素不會成為衍生動機;經由優選理論分析,從音韻結構角度切入,不僅可了解華語擬聲詞衍生的制約排序,亦更加了解其音韻構詞規範,且與實詞如形容詞進行重疊時的制約排序進行比較,說明華語擬聲詞在衍生過程中傾向遵循邊緣音韻規則,與其他實詞多依據核心音韻 規則的狀況大異其趣。以此為基石去了解其他漢語方言對於擬聲成詞的標準,甚或研究日語、韓語中豐富的擬聲詞,便能構擬出擬聲成詞更具體且具有說服力的語法規則。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In this thesis, the generation of Modern Mandarin disyllabic, trisyllabic and quadrisyllabic onomatopoeia under phonological viewpoint via Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky 1993/2004) approach will be discussed. In my M.A. Thesis ‘An OT analysis of Mandarin Onomatopoeia’, four factors motivated this study. First, the different sources of Mandarin disyllabic onomatopoeia which I thought there are monosyllabic and disyllabic inputs aroused my interests. Second, there are some similarities of Mandarin onomatopoeia between Mandarin core lexicons. Third, the reduplication mechanism in Mandarin onomatopoeia will be taken as a main point in this study. For example, in Modern Mandarin ‘gu’ (Sound of bird sing once) will extend into ‘gugu’ (Sound of birdsong) under total reduplication. Finally, the issue concerning what will be the best choice when Mandarin onomatopoeia is reduplicated with fixed segmentism also plays an important role in this study. For instance, the /l/ and /i/ in Modern Mandarin’s ‘pilipala’ (Sound of many things falling).
Onomatopoeias have their special function as sound-imitating icons. They are not the words which are formed by arbitrary but by the rules. They sometimes violate phonological structures of the language in which they occur; hence they belong to the peripheral phonology rather than core one. The Mandarin onomatopoeia is different from Mandarin content words; they are not motivated by semantic factors. So the Chinese onomatopoeia generation analysis via OT approach supplies not only the morpho-phonological constraints but also the comparison of peripheral words between content words. I would like to assume that the Mandarin onomatopoeia generation follows the peripheral phonological rules. This study will provide as a basement to study on other Chinese language’s onomatopoeia or even onomatopoeia in Tibetan, Japanese and Korean.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iv
VITA v
CHINESE ABSTRACT xi
ENGLISH ABSTRACT xii
CHAPTER
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1. Reduplication of Mandarin onomatopoeia 2
1.2. Mandarin core lexicon and Mandarin onomatopoeia reduplication 3
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 6
2.1. Optimality Theory 6
2.1.1. Basic concept of OT 6
2.1.2. Constraint family in OT 8
2.1.3 Cophonology 9
2.1.4 The emergence of the unmarked 10
2.2. Mandarin Chinese reduplication and Mandarin onomatopoeia 10
2.3. Reduplication in Optimality Theory 13
3. MANDARIN DISYLLABIC AND TRISYLLABIC ONOMATOPOEIA 16
3.1 Mandarin Disyllabic Onomatopoeia 16
3.1.1 Some background information 16
3.1.2 The description of reduplication data of Mandarin disyllabic onomatopoeia 16
3.1.2.1 AA Mandarin onomatopoeia 16
3.1.2.2 AB Mandarin onomatopoeia 22
3.1.3 Categories of Disyllabic Mandarin Onomatopoeia 28
3.1.4 Analysis of Monosyllabic Input 29
3.1.4.1. Generalized alignment constraint 30
3.1.4.2. Anchoring constraint………………………………………31
3.1.4.3. Adjacnecy constraint 31
3.1.4.4 Total Reduplication of AA 32
3.1.4.5 Ranking argument and Hasse diagram of AA Mandarin onomatopoeia 34
3.1.4.6 AB Mandarin Onomatopoeia— Consonant + /l/ 34
3.1.4.7 Ranking argument and Hasse diagram of AB Consonant+/l/ Mandarin onomatopoeia 38
3.1.4.8 AB Same Onset Collocation Mandarin Onomatopoeia 38
3.1.4.9 Ranking argument and Hasse diagram of AB Same Onset Collocation Mandarin onomatopoeia 41
3.1.4.10 Cophonology in monosyllable input Mandarin disyllabic onomatopoeia 42
3.1.5 Analysis of Disyllabic Input 42
3.1.5.1 AA Original Disyllable 42
3.1.5.2 Sound combination in AB Mandarin onomatopoeia 44
3.1.6 Summary 45
3.2 Mandarin Trisyllabic Onomatopoeia 46
3.2.1 Some Background Information 46
3.2.2 The description of the reduplication data of Mandarin trisyllabic onomatopoeia 46
3.2.2.1 ABB Mandarin onomatopoeia 47
3.2.2.2 AAB Mandarin onomatopoeia 49
3.2.3 The input claim of Mandarin trisyllabic onomatopoeia 50
3.2.4 Constraints for Mandarin trisyllabic onomatopoeia reduplication 51
3.2.5 Analysis of ABB Mandarin onomatopoeia 52
3.2.5.1 Consonant+/l/ and Stop+stop groups 52
3.2.5.2 Other AB patterns input forms and its ABB generation prediction 54
3.2.5.3 Ranking argument and Hasse diagram of ABB Mandarin onomatopoeia 57
3.2.6 Analysis of AAB Mandarin onomatopoeia 58
3.2.6.1 Same Onset Collocation group 58
3.2.6.2 Other AB patterns input forms and their AAB generation prediction 59
3.2.6.3 Ranking argument and Hasse diagram of AAB Mandarin onomatopoeia 63
3.2.7 Summary 63
4. MANDARIN QUADRISYLLABIC ONOMATOPOEIA 66
4.1 Mandarin Quadrisyllabic Onomatopoeia 66
4.1.1. Some background information 66
4.2. The description of reduplication data of Mandarin quadrisyllabic onomatopoeia 67
4.2.1. ABAB Mandarin onomatopoeia 67
4.2.2. AABB Mandarin onomatopoeia 71
4.2.3. AlBl Mandarin onomatopoeia 73
4.3. The input claim of Mandarin quadrisyllabic onomatopoeia 75
4.3.1. The input of ABAB and AABB Mandarin onomatopoeia 75
4.3.2. The input of AABB and AlBl Mandarin onomatopoeia 76
4.3.3. The /l/ segment as second and fourth onset of AlBl Mandarin onomatopoeia 77
4.4. Constraints for Mandarin quadrisyllabic onomatopoeia reduplication 77
4.4.1. Generalized alignment constraint 77
4.4.2 Anchoring Constraint ………………………78
4.4.3. Adjacency constraint 78
4.5. Analysis of ABAB Mandarin onomatopoeia 78
4.5.1. Consonant+/l/ group 79
4.5.2. Same onset collocation group 80
4.5.3. Sound combination group 81
4.5.4 Ranking argument and Hasse diagram of ABAB Mandarin onomatopoeia 84
4.6 Analysis of AABB Mandarin onomatopoeia 84
4.6.1 Same onset collocation group 85
4.6.2 Sound combination group 86
4.6.3 Obstruent +affricate/fricative group 87
4.6.4 The prediction of other AB Mandarin onomatopoeia groups 87
4.6.5 Ranking argument and Hasse diagram of AABB Mandarin onomatopoeia 90
4.7 Analysis of AlBl Mandarin onomatopoeia 90
4.7.1 Ranking argument and Hasse diagram of AlBl Mandarin onomatopoeia 94
4.7.2 Other AB Mandarin onomatopoeia 94
4.8 Summary 94
5. CONCLUSION 97
NOTE 101
REFERENCES 107
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097161007en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 華語音韻zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 優選理論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 擬聲詞zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 重疊zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Mandarin phonologyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Optimality Theoryen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Onomatopoeiaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Reduplicationen_US
dc.title (題名) 從優選理論分析華語擬聲詞結構zh_TW
dc.title (題名) An optimality theory analysis of Mandarin onomatopoeiaen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alderete, John et al. 1999. “Reduplication with Fixed Segmentism”. Linguistics Inquiry, Volume 30, Number 3: 327- 364.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anttila, Arto. 1997. ‘Deriving variation from grammar’, in Frans Hinskens, Roeland van Hout and Leo Wetzels, (eds.), Variation, Change and Phonological Theory, John Benjamins, Amsterdam / Philadelphia, pp. 35-68.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chao, Y.-R. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkely: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chen, Lu. 2007. Double Doubling in Disyllables – Reduplication in Mandarin. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Shanghai International Studies.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chiang, Wen-yu. 1992. The Prosodic Morphology and Phonology of Affixation in Taiwanese and Other Chinese Languages. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Delaware.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duanmu, San. 2007. The Phonology of Standard Chinese. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duanmu, San, 2000. “Hanyu de jiezou [Prodosy in Chinese]”. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics] 4: 203-209.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Katamba, Francis. 1989 An Introduction to Phonology, London ; New York : Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Inkelas, Sharon, and Cheryl Zoll. 2007. “Is grammar dependence real? A comparison between cophonological and indexed constraint approaches to morphonolically conditioned phonology.” Linguistics. 45.1: 133-171.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Katamba, Francis. 1993. Morphology. New York: St. Martin`s Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass. : Blackwellzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kitto, Catherine and Paul de Lacy. 1999. “A correspondence theory of epenthetic quality”. In Catherine Kitto and Carolyn Smallwood (eds.) Proceedings of AFLA (Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association) VI. Toronto: Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, pp.181‐200.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [Rutgers Optimality Archive#337zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lien, C.-F.1989. “Antonymous Quadrinominals in Chinese”. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 17, 263-206.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lombardi, Linda. 2002. “Coronal epenthesis and markedness.” Phonology, 19: 219-251zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lombardi, Linda. 2003. “Markedness and the typology of epenthetic vowels.” University of Maryland, unpublished manuscript. ROA -578zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lunden, S.L.Anya. 2004. “Reduplicant Placement, Achoring and Locality.” ROA-608, 1 – 18.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1993a. “Generalized Alignment.” Yearbook of Morphology, ed. G.E. and J. van Marle, 79 – 153. Kluwer.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1993b. “Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction.” Technical Reports of Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, No. 3. 26zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1994a. “The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology”. Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society 24zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1994b. “Prosodic Morphology”. A Handbook of Phonological Theory.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1995a. “Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity”.University of Massachusetts Occasional Paper in Linfuistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, ed. by Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey and Suzanne Urbanzyk, 249-384zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCarthy, John J. and Alan Prince. 1995b. Prosodic morphology. The Handbook of Phonological Theory, ed. by John Goldsmith, 318-366. Oxford: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCarthy, John and Alan Prince. 1999. “Faithfulness and Identity in Prosodic Morphology” The Prosody-morphology Interface, ed. by Rene Kager, Harry van der Hulst, and Wim Zonneveld, 218-309.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCarthy, John J. 2008. Doing Optimality Theory: Applying Theory to Data. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwellzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1996. Sign-Based Morphology and Phonology with special attention to Optimality Theory, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley, ROA-171.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers Universityzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tang, T.-C. 1988. “Hanyu Cifa Jufa Lunji [Studies on Chinese Morphology and Syntax]”. Taipei, Taiwan: Student Bokk Co. Ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yip, Moira. 2001. “Segmental Unmarkedness versus Input preservation in Reduplication.” in L. Limbardi, ed. Segmental Phonology in Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press. pp 206-230.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王洪君,2008,《漢語非線性音系學》,北京,北京大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李方桂,2003,《上古音研究》,北京,商務印書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李鏡兒 ,2007,《現代漢語擬聲詞研究》。中國:上海出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 竺家寧,1995,<論擬聲詞聲音結構中的邊音成分>,《國立中正大學學報人文分冊》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 竺家寧,2007,《聲韻學》,台北,五南出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林 尹,1971,《文字學概說》,台北,正中書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林語堂,1998,<古有複輔音說>,《古漢語複聲母論文集》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬慶株,2002,〈擬聲詞研究〉,《著名中年語言學家自選集‧馬慶株卷》,安徽,安徽教育出版zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馮勝利,2005,《漢語韻律語法研究》,北京,北京大學出版社。zh_TW