| dc.contributor.advisor | 葉浩 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 黃培維 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Huang, Pei Wei | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 黃培維 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Huang, Pei Wei | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2010 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 5-Oct-2011 14:49:13 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 5-Oct-2011 14:49:13 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 5-Oct-2011 14:49:13 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0097252009 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51379 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 政治研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 97252009 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 99 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本文從個人、國家和世界三個層面來重新建構約翰彌爾的公眾參與理論。其公眾參與理論包含了公民精神和公民參與這兩個部份。公民精神主要強調合作的精神，天才和菁英組成的知識階級公民必須和其他大眾階級的公民合作，才可以減少痛苦得到快樂，唯有合作才能讓每個人可以充分運用到自己的能力，享受到高級樂趣，得到個人的幸福，也讓社會獲得更多的效益。合作的精神必須透過實際的參與才可以學習，因此參與本身具有教育的功能。彌爾認為公民精神必須透過國家內部的地方和中央雙軌式的參與才可以培養，由知識階級擔任引導的角色，在參與過程中協助大眾階級的學習。這種方式擴展到世界上就是文明國家對野蠻國家的帝國主義干預。殖民地不適用於不干預原則，因為他們必須透過和統治者的合作，才能學習如何運用自己的能力來得到幸福。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This study tries to reconstruct John Stuart Mill’s theory of public participation from three perspectives: individual, national and international. This theory consists of an account of citizenship as well as an account of citizen participation. At the core of Mill’s idea of citizenship is cooperation between intelligent citizens, which include geniuses and elites, and the masses. By cooperation, people can make best use of their capacities, and attain their own higher pleasures and ultimately happiness. This citizen spirit can only be cultivated through political participation, and thus it has implications on education policy. The purpose of educating the masses is to help them develop and use their intellectual ability, and to do so intelligent citizens must assume the role of leading their fellow citizens with regard to political participation. And only from this perspective can we truly understand Mill’s theory of international intervention – or liberal imperialism, according to which civilized states are allowed to intervene the barbarian ones. Colonized population must cooperate with and learn from their rulers – that is to say, to conduct their own experiments in living under their colonizer’s tutelage. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第壹章 緒論 1第一節 研究動機與目的 1第二節 Mill的思想背景 5第三節 文獻回顧 7第四節 研究架構與章節安排 14第貳章 Mill論人的幸福 18第一節 Mill的心理學 18第二節 Mill的幸福觀 28第三節 自由主義與幸福 36第四節 小結 42第參章 Mill的公民精神思想 44第一節 公民品質的分類 45第二節 Mill的公民精神 53第三節 小結 63第肆章 Mill論參與的教育功能 65第一節 Mill的教育思想 65第二節 地方政治的參與 78第三節 代議制政府的參與 84第四節 小結 93第伍章 帝國公民的世界參與 95第一節 Mill的世界觀 95第二節 Mill的帝國主義：從不干預理論的角度出發 105第三節 帝國主義的參與準則 113第四節 小結 122第陸章 結論：重構與應用 124第一節 總結與評論 124第二節 未來與展望 129附錄 132參考書目 134 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097252009 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 約翰彌爾 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 效益主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 公民精神 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 公民參與 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 帝國主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | John Stuart Mill | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Utilitarianism | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | idea of citizenship | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | citizen participation | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Imperialism | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 個人、國家與世界：論約翰彌爾的公眾參與理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、中文部份 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (一)中文專書 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 江宜樺。2001。《自由民主的理路》，台北市：聯經。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李酉潭。1999。《自由、平等與民主 : 約翰彌勒與孫中山的政治思想》，台北市：國立編譯館。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林玉体。1999。《西洋教育史》，台北市：師大書苑。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 尚杰。2005。《西方哲學史第五卷：啟蒙時代的法國哲學》，江蘇：人民出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張明貴。1986。《約翰彌爾》，台北市：東大。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 浦興祖等。2009。《西方政治學說史》，上海：復旦大學出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (二)期刊論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 江宜樺。2005。<公民理念與公民的教育>，《通識教育季刊》，12(1)：27-44。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳俊宏。1998。<永續發展與民主：審議式民主理論初探>，《東吳政治學報》，9：85-122。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 梁福鎮。2009。<全球化脈絡下台灣公民教育的挑戰與回應>，《教育科學期刊》，8(1)：63-86。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張福建。2005。<參與和公民精神的養成：彌爾《代議政府論》的一種解讀>，《東吳政治學報》，21：41-61。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃俊龍。2003。<民主社會的菁英統治：對密爾《論代議政府》的一個詮釋>，《政治科學論叢》，18：217-240。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡英文。1999。<公民德性、市民社會與主權國家：現代市民社會論述之探討>，《政治科學論叢》，10：83-112。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 盧倩儀。2004。<審議式超國家主義>，《問題與研究》，43：53-71。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 羅新陽。2007。<解讀幸福指數>，《寧波廣州電視大學學報》，5(1)：97-101。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (三)會議論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李酉潭。2010。<生態主義與台海兩岸的發展—從約翰彌勒綠色自由主義的觀點談起>，「中國政治學會年會暨『能知的公民？民主的理想與實際』研討會」。高雄：中山大學，11月6-7日。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (四)學位論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 馬仲民。2000。《約翰．密爾論民主公民的品質及其條件》，台北市：國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 莊富源。2006。《轉變中的臺灣公民社會與公民教育 : 有關學校公民教育問題靣向及其發展趨勢之硏究》台北市：國立政治大學中山人文社會科學硏究所博士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (五)翻譯著作 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 克柏萊。1981。《西洋教育史》，楊亮功譯，台北市：協志。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 馬克福森。1993。《自由民主的經驗與時代》，張明貴譯，台北市：桂冠。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 馬秋德爾。1981。《印度通史》，李志夫譯，台北市：國立編譯館。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 羅勃茲。1986。《英國史》，賈士蘅譯，台北市：五南。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 盧梭。1989。《愛彌兒》，李平漚譯，台北市：五南。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 彌爾。1990。《論自由及論代議政治》，郭志嵩譯，台北市：協志工業叢書。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 彌爾。2007。《功利主義》，劉富勝譯，上海：光明日報。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 彌爾。2007。《我的知識之路：約翰彌爾自傳》，吳衡康、吳良健譯，台北市：網路與書。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 彌爾。2009。《政治經濟學原理》，金謫、金熠譯，北京：華夏出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 彌爾。2009。《精神科學的邏輯》，李滌非譯，杭州：浙江大學。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、英文部份 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (一)英文專書 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. London; New York: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Berger, Fred R. 1984. Happiness, Justice, and Freedom: the Moral and Political Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Berkeley: University of California Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bowen, James. 1981. A History of Western Education. London: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cook, Ian. 1998. Reading Mill: Studies in Political Theory. Australia: Palgrave Macmillan. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Donner, Wendy. 1991. The Liberal Self: John Stuart Mill`s moral and political philosophy. Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fine, Robert .2007. Cosmopolitanism. London; New York, N.Y.: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gray, John. 1996. Mill on Liberty : A Defence. London; New York: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gray, John and Smith, G.W.(ed.). 1991. J.S. Mill, On liberty in Focus. London; New York: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis.2004. Why Deliberative Democracy？.N.J.: Princeton University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Himmelfarb, Gertrude. 1990. On Liberty and Liberalism: The Case of John Stuart Mill. New York: Knopf. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Holbraad, Carsten. 1970. The Concert of Europe: A Study in German and British International Theory, 1815-1914. Harlow: Longmans. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Levin, Michael. 2004. J.S. Mill on Civilization and Barbarism. London; New York: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mill, James. 1992. Analysis of The Phenomena of The Human Mind. Vol. 1 & Vol. 2. London: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mill, John Stuart. 1963-91. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. ed. John M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nussbaum, Martha C. 1997.Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Parekh, Bhikhu C. 2000. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pitts, Jennifer. 2005. A Turn to Empire : The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ryan, Alan. 1970. The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Pantheon Books. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Smart, Paul. 1991. Mill and Marx : Individual Liberty and The Roads to Freedom. New York: Manchester University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Smith, G.W.(ed.) .1998. John Stuart Mill`s Social and Political Thought: Critical Assessments. London ; New York: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Skorupski , John. 1989. John Stuart Mill. London; New York: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Skorupski, John (ed.). 1998. The Cambridge Companion to Mill. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Skorupski , John. 2006. Why Read Mill today?. London; New York: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ten, C.L. (ed.). 1999. Mill`s Moral, Political, and Legal Philosophy. Brookfield, Vt.: Ashgate. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ten, C.L. (ed.). 2008. Mill`s On Liberty: A Critical Guide. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Thompson, Dennis F. 1976. John Stuart Mill and Representative Government. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Urbinati, Nadia .2002. Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex (ed.). 2007. J.S. Mill`s Political Thought : A Bicentennial Reassessment. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Varouxakis, Georgios. 2002. Mill on Nationality. London ; New York: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Varouxakis, Georgios and Schultz ,Bart(ed.). 2005. Utilitarianism and Empire. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Walzer, Michael. 2006. Just and Unjust Wars : a moral argument with historical illustrations. New York: Basic Books. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | West, Henry R. (ed.). 2006. The Blackwell Guide to Mill`s Utilitarianism. Malden, MA ; Oxford: Blackwell Pub. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zastopuil, Lynn. 1998. John Stuart Mill and India. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (二)多作者論文集中之論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Donner, Wendy. 1998. “Mill`s utilitarianism” in “The Cambridge companion to Mill” edited by John Skorupski. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Donner, Wendy. 2006. “Mill`s theory of value” in “The Blackwell guide to Mill`s Utilitarianism” edited by Henry R. West. Malden, MA ; Oxford: Blackwell Pub. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Donner, Wendy. 2007. “John Stuart Mill on education and democracy” in “J.S. Mill`s political thought : a bicentennial reassessment” edited by Nadia Urbinati and Alex Zakaras. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Donner, Wendy. 2008. “Autonomy, tradition, and the enforcement of morality” in “Mill`s On liberty : a critical guide” edited by C.L. Ten. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goldberg, David Theo. 2005. “Liberalism`s limits: Carlyle and Mill on the negro question” in “Utilitarianism and empire” edited by Bart Schultz and Georgios Varouxakis. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Holmes, Stephen. 2007. “Making Sense of Liberal Imperialism” in “J.S. Mill`s political thought : a bicentennial reassessment” edited by Nadia Urbinati and Alex Zakaras. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Miller, J. Joseph. 2005. “Chairing the Jamaica Committee: J. S. Mill and the limits of colonial authority” in “Utilitarianism and empire” edited by Bart Schultz and Georgios Varouxakis. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nussbaum, Martha C. 2005. “Mill on happiness: the enduring value of a complex critique” in “Utilitarianism and empire” edited by Bart Schultz and Georgios Varouxakis. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | O’Brink, David. 2008. “Mill`s liberal principles and freedom of expression” in “Mill`s On liberty : a critical guide” edited by C.L. Ten. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Varouxakis, Georgios. 2005. “Empire, race, euro-centrism: John Stuart Mill and his critics” in “Utilitarianism and empire” edited by Bart Schultz and Georgios Varouxakis. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Varouxakis, Georgios. 2007. “Cosmopolitan Patriotism in J.S. Mill’s Political Thought and Activism” in “J.S. Mill`s political thought : a bicentennial reassessment” edited by Nadia Urbinati and Alex Zakaras. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Walzer, Michael. 2007. “Mill’s ‘A Few Words on Non-Intervention’” in “J.S. Mill`s political thought : a bicentennial reassessment” edited by Nadia Urbinati and Alex Zakaras. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (三)期刊論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Anderson, Elizabeth S. 1991. “John Stuart Mill and Experiments in Living” Ethic 102(1): 4-26. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Berger, Fred R. 1978. “Mill’s Concept of Happiness” Interpretation 7:95-117. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bell, Duncan. 2006. “Empire and International Relations in Victorian Political Thought” The Historical Journal 49(1): 281-298. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bell, Duncan. 2010. “John Stuart Mill on Colonies” Political Theory 38(1): 34-64. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Doyle, Michael.2010. “A few words on Mill, Walzer, and Nonintervention” Ethics & International Affairs 23(4): 349-369. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Donner, Wendy. 1993. “John Stuart Mill’s Liberal Feminism” Philosophical Studies 69: 155-166. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Diamond, Larry. 1994. “Rethinking Civil Society: Toward Democratic Consolidation” Journal of Democracy, 5(3): 4–17. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Diamond, Larry. 2006. “Promoting Democracy in Post-Conflict and Failed States Lessons and Challenges” Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 2(2): 93-116. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gibbs, Benjamin. 1986. “Higher and Lower Pleasures” Philosophy 61(235): 31-59. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gray, John. 1981. “John Stuart Mill on Liberty, Utility, and Rights” Nomos 23: 80-116. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Harris, Abram L. 1964. “John Stuart Mill: Servant of the East India Company” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 30(2): 185-202. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Held, David. 2002. “Globalization, Corporate Practice and Cosmopolitan Social Standards” Contemporary Political Theory 1:59-78. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Holliger, David. 2001. “Not Universalist, Not Pluralists:the new cosmopolitans find their own way” Constellations 8(2): 236-248. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Martin, Rex. 1972. “A Defense of Mill’s Qualitative Hedonism” Philosophy 42: 140-151 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Miller, Kenneth E. 1961. “John Stuart Mill’s Theory of International Relations” Journal of the History of Ideas 22(4): 493-514. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | O’Brink, David. 1992. “Mill`s Deliberative Utilitarianism” Philosophy & Public Affairs 21: 67-103. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Prager, Carol A. L. 2005. “Intervention and Empire: John Stuart Mill and International Relations” Political Studies 53: 621-640. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Riley, Jonathan. 1991. “One Very Simple Principle” Utilitas 3:1-35. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rees, J.C. 1977. “The Thesis of the Two Mills” Philosophical Studies 25(3): 369-382. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sen, Amartya. 1983. “Liberty and Social Choice” Journal of Philosophy 80 (1): 5-28. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sullivan, Eileen P. 1983. “Liberalism and Imperialism: J.S. Mill’s Defense of the British Empire” Journal of the History of Ideas 44: 599-617. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Varouxakis, Georgios. 1998. “John Stuart Mill on Race” Utilitas 10(1): 17-33. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Varouxakis, Georgios. 1999. “Guizot’s Historical Works and J. S. Mill’s Reception of Tocqueville” History of Political Thought 20(2): 292-312. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (四)會議論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 葉浩。2009。 “Experiments in Living Progressive Being and Liberal Imperialism: An Interpretation of J. S. Mill’s International Political Thought”，中華民國國際關係學會第二屆年會暨「國際新情勢與兩岸新紀元：機會與挑戰」國際學術研討會議。 | zh_TW |
