學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 網路外部性下的市場演化
Market evolution with network externality
作者 魏全志
Wei, Chuan Chih
貢獻者 陳國樑
Chen, Joe
魏全志
Wei, Chuan Chih
關鍵詞 網路外部性
動態分析
市場演化
Network Externality
Dynamic Analysis
Market Evolution
日期 2010
上傳時間 5-Oct-2011 14:52:33 (UTC+8)
摘要 現今的科技產品環境,當新產品進入市場時,因為舊有產品使用者建構的網路外部性下,不容易開拓其市佔率。過去討論網路外部性的文獻中,大多僅探討一項新產品與舊有產品競爭的情況。然而,現實中往往出現多項產品同時在市場上競爭。本文模型建立在Jassen and Mendys (2007) 上,來探討擁有較高網路外部性之舊產品,面臨同時出現兩項品質較好之新產品時,市場佔有率的分佈樣貌。此模型中,存在於市場上的消費者對品質及網路外部性的偏好為異質,且模型中的消費者每期皆會重複購買該產品。本文發現,三項產品同時存在於市場上的穩定均衡解不存在,且市場均衡解將會出現在僅剩品質最優的新產品及既存舊產品共存的市場下,品質居中的產品無法存活於市場。新產品品質與舊產品品質間的差距不大時,舊產品仍然主導市場;若新產品品質明顯優於既有產品品質時,則新產品會拿下整個市場。且當品質優勢超過八分之一時,新產品將很快地占領整個市場。
The market today is a harsh environment for new firms introducing new technologies into it, because users of existing products have already constructed a tough network which cannot be shaken easily. On network externality, previous researches only analyzed the condition of one new product competing with one old product. However, in reality, there are often more than two products competing with each other in the market.
Based on Jassen and Mendys (2007), our model further discusses the outcome of the competition between two new superior products and an old inferior product. Consumers have different preferences of the quality and network externality of a product, and buy one product in each period. The outcome reveals that there is no stable equilibrium solution, when three products co-exist in the market. Stable equilibrium solution exists when there are only two products, the best one and the worst one, in the market. The product with middle quality cannot survive.
Also, old products can still possess the most part of the market when the quality differs subtly between new and old products. But when the quality of new products is apparently higher than that of old products, then new products could take over the whole market. We discovered that the quality difference must be greater than 0.125 for new products to dominate the market quickly.
參考文獻 ‧學術論文
Banerjee A. and D. Fudenberg (2004), “Word-of-mouth learning,” Games and Economic Behavior, 46(1): 1-22.
Church, J., Gandal, N., and D. Krause (2008), “Indirect networks effects and adoption externalities,” Review of Network Economics, 7(3): 337-358.
David P. A. (1985), “Clio and the economics of QWERTY,” The American Economic Review, 75(2): 332-337.
Economides, N. (1996), “The economics of networks,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(6): 673-699
Farrell, H. and D. W. Drezner (2008), “The power and politics of blogs,” Public Choice, 134: 15-30.
Farrell, J. and G. Saloner (1985), “Standardization, compatibility, and innovation,” The RAND Journal of Economics, 16(1): 70-83.
Farrell, J. and M. Rabin (1996), “Cheap talk,” Journal of Economic Perspective, 10(3): 103-118.
Goolsbee, A. and P.J. Klenow, (2002), “Evidence of learning and network externalities in the diffusion of home computers,” Journal of Law and Economics, 45(2): 317-343.
Gupta, C., Jain, D.C., and M.S. Sawhney (1999), “Modeling the evolution of markets with indirect network externalities: an application to digital television,” Marketing Science, 18(3): 396-416.
Janssen, M. C. W. and E. Mendys-Kamphorst (2007), “Evolution of market shares with repeated purchases and heterogeneous network externalities,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(5): 551-577.
Katz, M.L. and C. Shapiro (1985), “Network externalities, competition, and compatibilitiy,” The American Economic Review, 75(3): 424-440.
Katz, M.L. and C. Shapiro (1986), “Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities,” Journal of Political Economy, 94(4): 822-841.
Liebowitz, S. J. and S. E. Margolis (1990), “The fable of the keys,” Journal of Law and Economics, 33(1): 1-25.
Liebowitz, S. J. and S. E. Margolis (1994), “Network externality: an uncommon tragedy,” Journal of Economic Perspective, 8(2): 133-150.
Matutes, C. and P. Regibeau (1988), “Product compatibility without network externalities,” The RAND Journal of Economics, 19(2): 221-234.
The Nielsen Company (2009), “Trust, value and engagement in advertising,” Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey.
‧網路資料
“Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia”: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政研究所
97255026
99
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097255026
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 陳國樑zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Joeen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 魏全志zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wei, Chuan Chihen_US
dc.creator (作者) 魏全志zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Wei, Chuan Chihen_US
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 5-Oct-2011 14:52:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 5-Oct-2011 14:52:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 5-Oct-2011 14:52:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0097255026en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51392-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97255026zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 現今的科技產品環境,當新產品進入市場時,因為舊有產品使用者建構的網路外部性下,不容易開拓其市佔率。過去討論網路外部性的文獻中,大多僅探討一項新產品與舊有產品競爭的情況。然而,現實中往往出現多項產品同時在市場上競爭。本文模型建立在Jassen and Mendys (2007) 上,來探討擁有較高網路外部性之舊產品,面臨同時出現兩項品質較好之新產品時,市場佔有率的分佈樣貌。此模型中,存在於市場上的消費者對品質及網路外部性的偏好為異質,且模型中的消費者每期皆會重複購買該產品。本文發現,三項產品同時存在於市場上的穩定均衡解不存在,且市場均衡解將會出現在僅剩品質最優的新產品及既存舊產品共存的市場下,品質居中的產品無法存活於市場。新產品品質與舊產品品質間的差距不大時,舊產品仍然主導市場;若新產品品質明顯優於既有產品品質時,則新產品會拿下整個市場。且當品質優勢超過八分之一時,新產品將很快地占領整個市場。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The market today is a harsh environment for new firms introducing new technologies into it, because users of existing products have already constructed a tough network which cannot be shaken easily. On network externality, previous researches only analyzed the condition of one new product competing with one old product. However, in reality, there are often more than two products competing with each other in the market.
Based on Jassen and Mendys (2007), our model further discusses the outcome of the competition between two new superior products and an old inferior product. Consumers have different preferences of the quality and network externality of a product, and buy one product in each period. The outcome reveals that there is no stable equilibrium solution, when three products co-exist in the market. Stable equilibrium solution exists when there are only two products, the best one and the worst one, in the market. The product with middle quality cannot survive.
Also, old products can still possess the most part of the market when the quality differs subtly between new and old products. But when the quality of new products is apparently higher than that of old products, then new products could take over the whole market. We discovered that the quality difference must be greater than 0.125 for new products to dominate the market quickly.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一節 緒論 1
第二節 文獻回顧 6
2.1 總體的網路外部性 6
2.2 個體的網路外部性 9
2.3 小結 12
第三節 模型設定 14
3.1 基本假設 14
3.2 模型討論 17
第四節 結果分析 25
第五節 結論與建議 34
5.1 總結 34
5.2 建議 34
參考文獻 36
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097255026en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 網路外部性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 動態分析zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 市場演化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Network Externalityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Dynamic Analysisen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Market Evolutionen_US
dc.title (題名) 網路外部性下的市場演化zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Market evolution with network externalityen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ‧學術論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Banerjee A. and D. Fudenberg (2004), “Word-of-mouth learning,” Games and Economic Behavior, 46(1): 1-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Church, J., Gandal, N., and D. Krause (2008), “Indirect networks effects and adoption externalities,” Review of Network Economics, 7(3): 337-358.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) David P. A. (1985), “Clio and the economics of QWERTY,” The American Economic Review, 75(2): 332-337.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economides, N. (1996), “The economics of networks,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(6): 673-699zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Farrell, H. and D. W. Drezner (2008), “The power and politics of blogs,” Public Choice, 134: 15-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Farrell, J. and G. Saloner (1985), “Standardization, compatibility, and innovation,” The RAND Journal of Economics, 16(1): 70-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Farrell, J. and M. Rabin (1996), “Cheap talk,” Journal of Economic Perspective, 10(3): 103-118.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goolsbee, A. and P.J. Klenow, (2002), “Evidence of learning and network externalities in the diffusion of home computers,” Journal of Law and Economics, 45(2): 317-343.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gupta, C., Jain, D.C., and M.S. Sawhney (1999), “Modeling the evolution of markets with indirect network externalities: an application to digital television,” Marketing Science, 18(3): 396-416.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Janssen, M. C. W. and E. Mendys-Kamphorst (2007), “Evolution of market shares with repeated purchases and heterogeneous network externalities,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(5): 551-577.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Katz, M.L. and C. Shapiro (1985), “Network externalities, competition, and compatibilitiy,” The American Economic Review, 75(3): 424-440.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Katz, M.L. and C. Shapiro (1986), “Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities,” Journal of Political Economy, 94(4): 822-841.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Liebowitz, S. J. and S. E. Margolis (1990), “The fable of the keys,” Journal of Law and Economics, 33(1): 1-25.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Liebowitz, S. J. and S. E. Margolis (1994), “Network externality: an uncommon tragedy,” Journal of Economic Perspective, 8(2): 133-150.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Matutes, C. and P. Regibeau (1988), “Product compatibility without network externalities,” The RAND Journal of Economics, 19(2): 221-234.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) The Nielsen Company (2009), “Trust, value and engagement in advertising,” Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ‧網路資料zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) “Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia”: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki.zh_TW