| dc.contributor.advisor | 詹中原 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Jan, Chung Yuang | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 黃淑娥 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Huang, Shu Er Aimee | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 黃淑娥 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Huang, Shu Er Aimee | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2010 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 5-Oct-2011 14:56:22 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 5-Oct-2011 14:56:22 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 5-Oct-2011 14:56:22 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0095924006 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51455 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS) | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 95924006 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 99 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 在知識經濟發展的21世紀，高等教育的需求是世界性的趨勢。台灣在過去20年中，高等教育有急速的膨脹，因此高等教育的品質管制也成為重要的議題。高等教育評鑑中心 (HEEACT) 目前在台灣針對各類別的系所進行評鑑，其他非政府機構例如中華工程教育學會 IEET) ，以及國際機構AACSB也在台灣進行教育認證，目前教育部正擬定有關高等教育評鑑的國家政策。 國際化的衝擊，也是促進高等教育評鑑或認證的驅動力量。高等教育評鑑不僅提昇教學品質，也促進專業人員的國際流動性。在過去數年之中，對於高教評鑑中心執行之結果，各方有許多不同的觀點、爭議以及抱怨。本研究的目的，在於選擇高教評鑑相關之主要議題，收集專家學者的意見，並且討論受訪者對於這些議題具有共識或不同意見的結果。 本研究採取深度訪談的研究方法，獲取專家們對於高等教育評鑑或認證的看法。本研究共有15位專家學者參與訪談，由訪談結果顯示，受訪者在三分之一的議題方面具有較明顯的共識。本研究將訪談結果整理分析，並與文獻上所取得的資料相互對應比較。本研究結果對於政府制訂未來高等教育品質管制的政策提供有用的資料。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The demand of higher education is a worldwide trend in the knowledge based economy of the 21st century. Taiwan has a rapid higher education expansion during the past two decades, and the quality control is becoming a highly concerned issue. The Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council (HEEACT) is conducting general evaluations for higher education programs in Taiwan. Non-governmental commissions like the Institute of Engineering Education Taiwan (IEET) and the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) are also conducting accreditations in Taiwan. A national policy for the effective evaluation of higher education is currently formulating by the Ministry of Education. The impact of globalization is another driving force for the evaluation and accreditation of higher education programs. Higher education evaluation and accreditation not only enhance the teaching quality, but also promote professional mobility. During the last several years, there were different opinions, arguments and complains for the evaluation conducted by HEEACT. The aim of this study was to select major issues of higher education evaluation, to find out opinions from related experts, and to discuss the differences and similarities of interview results. This research applied the in-depth interview method to collect the comments for higher education evaluation and accreditation in Taiwan. Fifteen professionals and administration leaders have been interviewed. The interviewees showed consensus on one third of the interview questions. Their opinions on various interview topics have been recorded, analyzed, and compared with literature evidences. The results of this study provide useful information to the future policy and improvement. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Abstract 1Chapter 1 Introduction 31.1 Research background 31.1-1 The expansion of higher education in Taiwan 31.1-2 The importance of quality control of higher education 51.1-3 The impact of globalization in higher education 61.2 Motivation and target of this research 121.3 Scope of this research 14Chapter 2 Literature Review 172.1 Formation of higher educational networks 172.1-1 The Bologna Process 172.1-2 Effects of the Bologna Process 202.2 The accreditation systems for quality assurance 252.2-1 Importance of quality assurance 252.2-2 Different opinions on accreditation 272.3 Higher education evaluation in Taiwan 322.3-1 Development of the evaluation system 322.3-2 Arguments from higher education evaluation 342.3-3 Perspective of higher education 36Chapter 3 Design of This Research 383.1 Structure of this research 383.1-1 Investigation through interview 383.1-2 Glossary of items for the evaluation/accreditation 403.2 Method of this research 413.2-1 Design of interview problems 413.2-2 Quantitative questionnaire to the interviewees 463.2-3 Proposed list of interviewees 473.2-4 Hypotheses of this study 483.2-5 Restrictions of this method 493.3 Methods of analyses 503.3-1 Characterization of responses 503.3-2 Correlation with literature evidence 513.4 The expected results of this research 52Chapter 4 The Interview Analysis and Discussion (A): Outcome-based Approach and the Role of HEEACT 544.1 The suitability of the outcome-based evaluation or accreditation 544.2 A brief summary of section 4.1 634.3 The issue of the HEEACT task transformation 634.4 A brief summary of section 4.3 73Chapter 5 The Interview Analysis and Discussion (B): Passing Ratio of Evaluation and the Exercise of Civil Right 745.1 The research on maintaining the failure ratio of evaluation 745.2 A brief summary of section 5.1 865.3 Discussions on the exercising of civil rights in conducting evaluation 875.4 A brief summary of section 5.3 95Chapter 6 The Interview Analysis and Discussion (C): Global Connection, Issuing License and Related Topics 976.1 The discussion on the importance of global connection 976.2 A brief summary of section 6.1 1116.3 The discussion between evaluation results and professional certification examinations 1126.4 A brief summary of section 6.3 1196.5 The analysis and discussion of other interview opinions 1206.6 A brief summary of section 6.5 132Chapter 7 Quantitative Analysis of Interview Results and Comparison with Literature Evidences 1347.1 Quantitative Analysis of Interview Results 1347.1.-1 Quantitative results from questionnaires 1347.1-2 Discussions on the consensus of questionnaire results 1377.1-3 Comparison between in-depth interview and quantitative analysis results 1427.2 Comparison of interview results with literature evidences 1447.2-1 The importance of quality assurance through accreditation 1447.2-2 Advantages and disadvantages of higher education accreditation 1457.2-3 Arguments on the evaluation results from HEEACT in Taiwan 1477.3 Summary and suggestions 149Chapter 8 Conclusion 152References 155Appendix A: Questionnaire for the in-depth interview of this study (Chinese version) 160Appendix B: Questionnaire for the quantitative interview (Chinese Version) 165Appendix C: The Interview Analysis and Discussion, (Chinese Version) 168 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095924006 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 深度訪談 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 高等教育 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 評鑑 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 認證 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | In-depth Interview | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Higher Education | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Evaluation | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Accreditation | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 台灣高等教育評鑑制度改進之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | A study of improvements for higher education evaluation system in Taiwan | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | AACSB 2004, Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. http://www.accsb.edu/accred.html | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | AACSB DataDirect, http://www.aacsb.edu/knowledgeservices/datadirect/dd-intro.asp | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | AEF website, http://www.apecef.org | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | APEC website, http://www.apec.org | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., Huff, A. S., Cognitive change strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management Journal., 13, 15-36 (1992) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bologna with Student Eyes, the official Bologna Process website (2007-2010) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/hogeronderwijs/bologna/documents/) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bologna Process Stocktaking Report 2009, the official Bologna Process website (2007-2010), http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/hogeronderwijs/bologna/documents/ | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chu, J. Y., Research report to the Public Construction Commission of the Executive Yuan, No. 950029 (in Chinese), December (2006). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Contractor A., The Long Road to Bologna, The Australian (online newspaper of the year), January 29 (2009) (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education, http//:www.edu.tw/statistics | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dreyfack, M., Sony Walkman off to a running start. Marketing and Media Decision, 16 (10), 70-72 (1981) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Guler, I., Guillen, M. F., MacPherson, J. M., Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of ISO 9000 quality certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 207-232 (2002) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | HEEACT, http://www.heeact.edu.tw/ | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | HEEACT, Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Higher Education Evaluation, Taipei, Taiwan (2006) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hill, R. C., When the going gets tough: A Baldridge Award Winner on the line. Academy of Management Executive, 7 (3), 75-79 (1993). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hsu, L. A. and Lin, M. Y., Lessons of the implementation of outcomes-based education reform in the US (in Chinese), 教育政策論壇，8(2), 55-74 (2005). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | IEET website, http://www.ieet.org.tw | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ieet.org.tw/download/2009年IEET受認證系所研習會 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Information Note, Policy Forum on Accreditation and the Global Higher Education | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Market. International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP), Paris, June 13-14 (2005) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | JABEE website, http://www.jabee.org (2008). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Julian, S. D. and Ofori-Dankwa, J. C., Is accreditation good for strategic decision making of traditional business schools? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 225-233 (2006). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kells, H. R., The universities in a time of increased regulations: responsibilities, opportunities and dangers. Proc. 2006 International Conference on Higher Education Evaluation, HEEACT, Taipei, Taiwan (2006). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kells, H. R., Self-study process: A guide for post-secondary institution, New-York, MacMillian Publishing, 1983. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kerby, D., Weber, S., Linking mission objectives to an assessment plan. J. Education for Business, 75 (4) 202-209 (2000) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Konjic, T. and Sarajlic, N., Higher education structure at the faculty of electrical engineering, University of Tuzla: Influence of the Bologna agreement International J. of Electrical Engineering Education, 44 (2), 166-174 (2007). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lieven, M. and Martin, G., Higher education in a global market: the case of British overseas provision in Israel. Higher Education, 52, 41-68 (2006). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lin, C. H., Education expansion, educational inequality, and income inequality: edidence from Taiwan. Social Indicators Research, 80, 601-615 (2007). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lin, W. C., Discours de la méthode（方法論） : Research method in Social Sciences (in Chinese), 工作坊寫真, Center for China Studies, National Cheng Chi University, p. 23-27, November (2005). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mok, K. H., Globalization and higher education reconstructing in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China. Higher Education Research, 22, 117-129 (2003). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | NCCU, Proceedings of Public Policy Forum: Evaluation and Accreditation of Professional Schools, Taipei, Taiwan (2007). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Roller, R. H., Andrew, B. K., Bovee, S. L., Specialized accreditation of business schools: A comparison of costs, benefits, and motivations. Journal of Education of Business, 78 (4), 197-204 (2003) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Romeo, E. I., AACSB accreditation: Addressing faculty concerns, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7 (2) 245-255 (2008) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shearman, R., Bologna: Engineering the right outcomes. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 44, 97-100 (2007). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Spady, W. G., Choosing outcomes of significance, Educational Leadership, 51, 18-22 (1994). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | The Future Projects: Policy for Higher Education in a Changing World. The universal impact of competition and globalization in higher education. Brown University, http://www.futureproject.org, (2000). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Van Damme, D., Quality issues in the internationalism of higher education. Higher Education, 41, 415-441 (2001). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wang, R. J., From elitism to mass higher education in Taiwan: the problems faced. Higher Education, 46, 261-287 (2003). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | White Paper of University Education Policy, Ministry of Education, Taiwan (2001). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wikipedia Bologna Process, http://en.wikipedia/wiki/Bologna_process | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yang, Y., Report on the Effect of the Bologna Process (in Chinese), Evaluation Bimonthly, No. 8, 55-59 (2007a). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yang, Y., The London Communiqué in the Bologna Process (in Chinese), Evaluation Bimonthly, No. 10, 57-60 (2007b). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zaheer, A. and Zaheer, S., Riding the wave: Alertness, responsiveness, and performance in global electronic networks. Best Paper Proceedings, National Academy of Management Conferences, 72 (2005) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zammuto, R. F., Accreditation and the globalization of business. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7, 256-268 (2008). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王順民，關於大學評鑑與退廠機制，國政研究報告，財團法人國家政策研究基金會 (National Policy Foundation)，December 28 (2007). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王保進，大學自我評鑑，台北，正中書局，2002. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 大學自我評鑑結果及國內外專業評鑑機構認可要點，評鑑雙月刊，19, 56-57 (2009) | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 方嘉麟，大學評鑑不瞭解科技整合，中國時報，時論廣場，一月九日，2009. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 牟宗燦，CHEA監督力強，國內可借鏡，評鑑雙月刊，7, 61 (2007). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 邱于貞，亞太地區高等教育評鑑與學生學習成果研討會，國立台灣大學教學發展中心電子報，6月30日 (2009). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林尚平，評鑑取向的觀點，評鑑雙月刊，14, 23-28 (2008). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林金定，嚴嘉楓，陳美花，質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析，身心障礙研究，3, No. 2, 122-136 (2005). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 高教評鑑中心，系所評鑑回應，評鑑雙月刊，14, 28 (2008). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 郭明政，資源共享，還是分割，高教評鑑譴責教部政策？聯合報，民意論壇，一月十二日，2009a. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 郭明政，戕害學術，高教哀哀叫，聯合報，民意論壇，五月十三日，2009b. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳振遠，從規劃、執行與回饋面看高教評鑑的專業分工，評鑑雙月刊，18, 17-19 (2009). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳曼玲，結合評鑑制度，再造大學新局，專訪教育部政務次長呂木琳，評鑑雙月刊，10, 1-3 (2007). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 經濟日報社論, 消滅競爭力從亂整高教起，經濟日報，一月二十一日，2009. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 楊朝祥，徐明珠，台灣高等教育指標國際化之比較研究，國政研究報告，財團法人國家政策研究基金會 (National Policy Foundation)，August, 28 (2008). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉維琪，管制干預或市場機制？從認可評鑑談大學招生政策，評鑑雙月刊，14, 4-5 (2008). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉曼君，「成果導向」認證檢視畢業生核心能力，評鑑雙月刊，6, 30-31 (2007). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉曼君，界定核心能力標準展現自我特色，評鑑雙月刊，11, 38-39 (2008). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 潘慧玲，方案評鑑的緣起與概念，教師天地，117, 26-31 (2002). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 盧增緒，論教育評鑑觀念之形成，中國教育學會主編，教育評鑑，台北，師大書苑，pp. 3-59 (1995). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 戴曉霞，大學評鑑的興起、模式與問題，反思台灣的高等學術評鑑研討會，9月25-26日，台北 (2004). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 嚴昆陽，再哀大學以及一些期待與建議，當前高教學術評鑑的並癥與解咒的可能，反思台灣的高等學術評鑑研討會，9月25-26日，台北 (2004). | zh_TW |
