學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 財政分權對社會福利支出規模之影響-跨國實證分析
The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Social Expenditure
作者 王雅婷
貢獻者 陳香梅
王雅婷
關鍵詞 財政分權
社會福利支出
跨國實證分析
日期 2009
上傳時間 11-Oct-2011 17:02:59 (UTC+8)
摘要 2009年完成的內政部升格改制審查會議將台北縣、台中縣市、台南縣市、與高雄縣市升格或合併升格為直轄市,這次的直轄市升格可說是我國邁向地方財政分權的重要里程碑。不過,地方財政分權後,地方的財源增加,能否因為提升地方資源分配效率而創造更大的整體利益與人民福祉,仍有待驗證。而截至目前為止,大部份關於財政分權影響公共服務提供的實證文獻都集中研究焦點於公共支出的總規模上,探討財政分權對公共支出組成項目之影響文獻是有限的,且該類文獻也多集中於基礎建設支出、教育與醫療支出,唯有一篇Oates於1999年提出相關理論:由於低所得和高所得的家計單位皆具有流動性,地方政府若重視社會福利支出,將更容易吸引窮人移入而使富人離開,所以財政分權下的政策將促使救助低所得之社會福利支出提供不足。因此,基於過去的學術文獻並未實證探討財政分權對社會福利支出(social spending)規模的影響;而且國家的財政分權程度可能會因政治組織形式的不同而有所差異。本文將選樣國家區分成單一制和聯邦制,利用1996-2004年12個單一制國家和5個聯邦制國家的資料,並使用追蹤資料的分析方法和相關檢定,期望能分析財政分權與福利國家是否為衝突的政策目標。
本文的結論主要為當國家以不同的政治組織形式-單一制與聯邦制區分時,其財政分權程度會對於該國的社會福利支出規模有不同的影響。由於,單一制國家相對聯邦制國家在政治體制上的財政分權程度較低,地方政府的有效職能均由中央政府掌握,並且社會福利支出往往也是中央政府進行所得分配功能的工具之一,在此條件之下,地方政府的地方支出占總支出的比例自然提高;另外,當地方政府的財政能力不足,甚至較大比例是由中央政府移轉來支持的情況下,社會福利支出往往就被排擠,而被經濟導向的支出所取代。在聯邦制的國家中,由於地方政府在某些領域擁有獨有的權力,地方之間競爭的壓力自然增強,為了吸引有錢人或外資移入,對經濟發展影響較小的社會福利支出很容易成為犧牲的目標,因而形成聯邦制國家的地方政府在支出分權和收入分權上,和社會福利支出規模呈現顯著的負向關係。
參考文獻 乔宝云、范剑勇、冯兴元 (2005)。中国的财政分权与小学义务教育。中國社會科學,2005年第6期。取自http://202.121.15.143/aspfiles/document/b61/ab610313.asp。
詹火生 (2010)。建立中央與地方政府社會福利財政合理負擔制度。財團法人國家政策研究基金會,國政評論,社會(評)099-009號。
周麗芳、黃依珮、陳美慈 (2002)。低收入戶福利支出與地方財政。民主政治與社會福利,地方政府與社會福利,台灣社會福利學會。
Adsera, A., & C. Boix (2002). The political economy of trade and economic integration: a review essay, In Robert Devlin & Antoni Estevadeordal (Eds.), Bridges for development: Policies and institutions for trade and integration, (pp. 75-88). New York: Inter-American Development Bank.
Akai, N., & M. Sakata (2002). Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States. Journal of Urban Economics 52, 93–108.
Ashworth J., E. Galli, & F. Padovano (2006). Decentralization as a constraint to leviathan: A panel cointergration analysis. Retrieved November 30, 2009, from http://www-3.unipv.it/websiep/wp/530.pdf.
Asia Development Bank (2007). Key indicators 2007: inequality in asia. Retrieved November 30, 2009, from http://www.adb.org/Documents/Books/Key_Indicators/2007/default.asp.
Avelino, G., D. S. Brown, & W. Hunter (2005). The effect of capital mobility, trade openness, and democracy on social spending in Latin America, 1980-1999. American Journal of Political Science: 49(3), 625-641.
Bardhan, Pranab (1997). The role of governance in economic development: A political economy approach. Paris: OECD Development Center, Paris.
Berberich, C. & J. M. Metzler (2005). Fiscal federalism and the leviathan: The evil beast or the lesser evil. Kiel Advanced Studies Working Papers No. 422. Retrieved November 20, 2009, from http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/~metzler/berberich,metzler_2005_leviathan.pdf.
Blank, Rebecca M. (1988). The effect of welfare and wage levels on the location decisions of females-header households. Journal of Urban Economics 24, 186-211.
Bird R. M. (1993). Threading the fiscal labyrinth: some issues in fiscal decentralization. National Tax Journal 46, 207-27.
Brennan, G., & J. Buchanan (1980). The power to tax: analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge University Press.
Bryant, J. (2003). Modeling the effect of population ageing on government social expenditures. New Zealand Treasury Working Paper. Retrieved November 20, 2009, from http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/research-policy/wp/2003/03-15/twp03-15.pdf.
Ebdel, R. W., & Yilmaz, S. (2002). On the measurment and impact of decentralization. Working paper series. Washington D.C.:World Bank. From http://lgi.osi.hu/publications/2003/250/FDI-Croatia-US.pdf#page=16.
Ebel R. D., & S. Yilmaz (2002). Concept of fiscal decentralization and worldwide overview. Retrieved November 20, from http://www.desequilibrefiscal.gouv.qc.ca/en/pdf/ebel.pdf.
Ehdaie, J. (1994). Fiscal decentralization and the size of government. World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper (NO. 1387). From http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1994/12/01/000009265_3970716142007/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf.
Estache, A., & S. Sinha (1995). Does decentralization increase spending on public infrastructure? Policy Research Working Paper Series (NO.1457). World Bank. From http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=623919.
Faguet, J. P. (2004). Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs? evidence from Bolivia. Journal of Public Economics 88, 867-893.
Fiva, J. H. (2006). New evidence on the effect of fiscal decentralization on the size and composition of government spending. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 62(2), 250-280.
Gramlich, E. M., & D. S. Laren (1984). Migration and income redistribution responsibilities. The Journal of Human Resources, 19(4), 489-511.
Granado, A. Z., F. Javier , J. Martinez-Vazquez , & R. McNab (2005). Fiscal decentralization and the functional composition of public expenditures. International Studies Program Working Paper Series0501. International Studies Program, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University. Retrieved November 20, 2009, from http://aysps.gsu.edu/isp/files/ispwp0501.pdf.
Grossman G. M., & E. Helpman (1994). Protection for sale. The American Economic Review, 84(4), 833-850.
Hadri, K. (2002). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 3(2), 148-161.
Haggard, S., & R. R. Kaufman (2008). Development, democracy, and welfare states. New Jersey: Preston University.
Hemmings, P., D. Turner, & S. Parviainen (2003). Enhancing the effectiveness of public spending in Finland. OECD Economic Department Working Papers. Retrieved November 20, 2009, from http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2003doc.nsf/LinkTo/NT00004106/$FILE/JT00146242.pdf.
Im, K. S., M. H. Pesaran, & Y. Shin (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Ecometrics, 115(1), 53-74.
Jarque, C., & A. Bera. (1980). Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters 6, 255–259.
Jin, J., & H. F. Zou (2002). How does fiscal decentralization affect
aggregate, national, and subnational government size? Journal of Urban Economics, 52(2), 270-293.
Joumard, I., & P. M. Kongsrud (2003). Fiscal relations across government levels. OECD Economic Studies No.36. Retrieved November 20, 2009, from
Kaufman R. R., & A. Segura-Ubiergo (2001). Globalization, domestic politics, and social spending in Latin America: a time-series cross-section analysis, 1973-97. World Politics, 53(4), 553-587.
King, D., & Y. Ma (2001). Fiscal decentralization, central bank independence, and inflation. Economics Letters 72, 95–98.
Korpi W., & J. Palme (2003). New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95. American Political Science Review 97(3), 425-446.
Lake D. A., & M. A. Baum (2001). The invisible hand of democracy: political control and the provision of public services. Comparative Political Studies. From http://spcps.highwire.org/cgi/reprint/34/6/587.
Levin, A., C. F. Lin, & C. S. Chu (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24.
Lindert P. H. (1996). What limits social spending? Explorations in Economic History 33, 1–34.
Litvack, Jennie & Jessica Seddon (1999). Decentralization briefing notes. World Bank. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/WBI/Resources/wbi37142.pdf.
Marlow M. L. (1988). Fiscal decentralization and government size. U.S. Department of Treasury. Public Choice 56:259-269.
Martinez-Vazquez J., & R. M. McNab (2003). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth. World Development, 31(9), 1597-1616.
Meloche, J. P., F. Vaillancourt, & S. Yilmaz (2004). Decentralization or fiscal autonomy? What does really matter? - Effects on growth and public sector size in European Transition Countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3254. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from
http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2004/04/15/000012009_20040415162715/Rendered/PDF/WPS3254.pdf.
Mogull R. G. (1978). State and local antipoverty expenditures. Public Finance Review,6, 287-303.
Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance: A study in public finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Niskanen, W. A. (1975). Bureaucrats and politicians. Journal of Law and Economics 18, 617-643.
Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal federalism. EUA : Harcourt.
Oates, W. (1985).Searching for leviathan: an empirical study. American Economic Review 75, 748-757.
Oates, W. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120-1149.
Pettersson-Lidbom P., & B. Tyrefors (2007). The policy consequences of direct versus representative democracy: A regression-discontinuity approach. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://people.su.se/~pepet/directdem.pdf.
Prohl S., & F. Schneider (2009). Does decentralization reduce government size? a quantitative study of the decentralization hypothesis. Public Finance Review, 37(6), 639-664.
Przeworski, A., M. E. Alvarez, J. A. Cheibub, & F. Limongi (2000). Democracy and Development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Prud`homme, R. (1995). The dangers of decentralization. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/10/2/201.
Razin, A., E. Sadka, & P. Swagel (2002). The aging population and the size of the welfare state. The Journal of Political Economy, 110(4), 900-918.
Rodden, J. (2003). Reviving leviathan: fiscal federalism and the growth of government. International Organization 57, 695-729.
Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have larger governments? Journal of Political Economy 106.
Rudra, N., & S. Haggard (2005). Globalization, democracy, and effective welfare spending in the developing world. Comparative Political Studies, 38(9), 1015-1049.
Shah, A. (2004). Fiscal decentralization in developing and transition economies: progress, problems, and the promise. Policy Research Working Paper Series 3282, Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/PAKISTANEXTN/Resources/pdf-Files-in-Events/IRISD/FiscalDecentral02.pdf.
Shah, A. (2005). Fiscal decentralization and fiscal performance. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3786. From http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=873894
Seabright P. (1996). Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review, 40(1), 61-89.
Sears D. O., & J. Citrin (1982). Tax revolt: Something for nothing in California. Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, United States of America.
Snyder, J. M., & I. Yackovlev (2005). Political and Economic Determinants of Government Spending on Social Protection Programs. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://econ-www.mit.edu/files/1207.
Southwick L. (1981). Public welfare programs and recipient migration. Growth and Change, 12 (4), 22-32.
Stein E. (1999). Fiscal decentralization and government size in Latin America. Journal of Applied Economics, 2(2), 357-391.
Thieβen, Ulrich (2003). Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth in high-income OECD countries, Fiscal Studies, 24 (3), 237-274.
Treisman D. (2002). Defining and measuring decentralization: A global perspective. Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles 4289 Bunche Hall Los Angeles.
Treisman D. (2006). Explaining fiscal decentralization: Geography, colonial history, economic development, and political institutions. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 44(3), 289 – 325..
Tullock, G. (1959). Problems of majority voting. Journal of Political Economy, 67(6), 571-579.
Von Braun, Joachim & Ulrike, Grote (2000). Does decentralization serve the poor? IMF-conference on fiscal decentralization 20-21 November in Washington D. C. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/seminar/2000/fiscal/vonbraun.pdf.Wildavsky, A. (1974). The Politics of the Budgetary Process, 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown.
Wildavsky A. & H. Heclo (1974). The private government of public money: Community and policy inside British politics. University of California press.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
World Bank (2004). Measuring fiscal decentralization. Data Note. From worldbank.org.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財政研究所
97255006
98
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097255006
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 陳香梅zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 王雅婷zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 王雅婷zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned 11-Oct-2011 17:02:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-Oct-2011 17:02:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-Oct-2011 17:02:59 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0097255006en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51627-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財政研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97255006zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 2009年完成的內政部升格改制審查會議將台北縣、台中縣市、台南縣市、與高雄縣市升格或合併升格為直轄市,這次的直轄市升格可說是我國邁向地方財政分權的重要里程碑。不過,地方財政分權後,地方的財源增加,能否因為提升地方資源分配效率而創造更大的整體利益與人民福祉,仍有待驗證。而截至目前為止,大部份關於財政分權影響公共服務提供的實證文獻都集中研究焦點於公共支出的總規模上,探討財政分權對公共支出組成項目之影響文獻是有限的,且該類文獻也多集中於基礎建設支出、教育與醫療支出,唯有一篇Oates於1999年提出相關理論:由於低所得和高所得的家計單位皆具有流動性,地方政府若重視社會福利支出,將更容易吸引窮人移入而使富人離開,所以財政分權下的政策將促使救助低所得之社會福利支出提供不足。因此,基於過去的學術文獻並未實證探討財政分權對社會福利支出(social spending)規模的影響;而且國家的財政分權程度可能會因政治組織形式的不同而有所差異。本文將選樣國家區分成單一制和聯邦制,利用1996-2004年12個單一制國家和5個聯邦制國家的資料,並使用追蹤資料的分析方法和相關檢定,期望能分析財政分權與福利國家是否為衝突的政策目標。
本文的結論主要為當國家以不同的政治組織形式-單一制與聯邦制區分時,其財政分權程度會對於該國的社會福利支出規模有不同的影響。由於,單一制國家相對聯邦制國家在政治體制上的財政分權程度較低,地方政府的有效職能均由中央政府掌握,並且社會福利支出往往也是中央政府進行所得分配功能的工具之一,在此條件之下,地方政府的地方支出占總支出的比例自然提高;另外,當地方政府的財政能力不足,甚至較大比例是由中央政府移轉來支持的情況下,社會福利支出往往就被排擠,而被經濟導向的支出所取代。在聯邦制的國家中,由於地方政府在某些領域擁有獨有的權力,地方之間競爭的壓力自然增強,為了吸引有錢人或外資移入,對經濟發展影響較小的社會福利支出很容易成為犧牲的目標,因而形成聯邦制國家的地方政府在支出分權和收入分權上,和社會福利支出規模呈現顯著的負向關係。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 壹、前言 1
貳、財政分權指標及國際財政分權的趨勢 4
一、財政分權程度的衡量方式及其可能的問題 5
二、財政分權的國際趨勢 6
参、研究設計與模型檢定 10
一、研究設計 10
二、變數解釋與資料來源說明 10
三、估計模型 14
肆、實證結果與分析 16
一、基本統計量 16
二、模型的檢定結果 18
三、實證結果 19
伍、結論與建議 24
一、結論 24
二、建議 24
參考文獻 26
附錄 A財政分權指標的計算公式 32
附錄 B世界各國的財政分權變動情形 34
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097255006en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 財政分權zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會福利支出zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 跨國實證分析zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 財政分權對社會福利支出規模之影響-跨國實證分析zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Social Expenditureen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 乔宝云、范剑勇、冯兴元 (2005)。中国的财政分权与小学义务教育。中國社會科學,2005年第6期。取自http://202.121.15.143/aspfiles/document/b61/ab610313.asp。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 詹火生 (2010)。建立中央與地方政府社會福利財政合理負擔制度。財團法人國家政策研究基金會,國政評論,社會(評)099-009號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周麗芳、黃依珮、陳美慈 (2002)。低收入戶福利支出與地方財政。民主政治與社會福利,地方政府與社會福利,台灣社會福利學會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Adsera, A., & C. Boix (2002). The political economy of trade and economic integration: a review essay, In Robert Devlin & Antoni Estevadeordal (Eds.), Bridges for development: Policies and institutions for trade and integration, (pp. 75-88). New York: Inter-American Development Bank.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Akai, N., & M. Sakata (2002). Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States. Journal of Urban Economics 52, 93–108.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ashworth J., E. Galli, & F. Padovano (2006). Decentralization as a constraint to leviathan: A panel cointergration analysis. Retrieved November 30, 2009, from http://www-3.unipv.it/websiep/wp/530.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Asia Development Bank (2007). Key indicators 2007: inequality in asia. Retrieved November 30, 2009, from http://www.adb.org/Documents/Books/Key_Indicators/2007/default.asp.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Avelino, G., D. S. Brown, & W. Hunter (2005). The effect of capital mobility, trade openness, and democracy on social spending in Latin America, 1980-1999. American Journal of Political Science: 49(3), 625-641.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bardhan, Pranab (1997). The role of governance in economic development: A political economy approach. Paris: OECD Development Center, Paris.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Berberich, C. & J. M. Metzler (2005). Fiscal federalism and the leviathan: The evil beast or the lesser evil. Kiel Advanced Studies Working Papers No. 422. Retrieved November 20, 2009, from http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/~metzler/berberich,metzler_2005_leviathan.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Blank, Rebecca M. (1988). The effect of welfare and wage levels on the location decisions of females-header households. Journal of Urban Economics 24, 186-211.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bird R. M. (1993). Threading the fiscal labyrinth: some issues in fiscal decentralization. National Tax Journal 46, 207-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brennan, G., & J. Buchanan (1980). The power to tax: analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bryant, J. (2003). Modeling the effect of population ageing on government social expenditures. New Zealand Treasury Working Paper. Retrieved November 20, 2009, from http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/research-policy/wp/2003/03-15/twp03-15.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ebdel, R. W., & Yilmaz, S. (2002). On the measurment and impact of decentralization. Working paper series. Washington D.C.:World Bank. From http://lgi.osi.hu/publications/2003/250/FDI-Croatia-US.pdf#page=16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ebel R. D., & S. Yilmaz (2002). Concept of fiscal decentralization and worldwide overview. Retrieved November 20, from http://www.desequilibrefiscal.gouv.qc.ca/en/pdf/ebel.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ehdaie, J. (1994). Fiscal decentralization and the size of government. World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper (NO. 1387). From http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1994/12/01/000009265_3970716142007/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Estache, A., & S. Sinha (1995). Does decentralization increase spending on public infrastructure? Policy Research Working Paper Series (NO.1457). World Bank. From http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=623919.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Faguet, J. P. (2004). Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs? evidence from Bolivia. Journal of Public Economics 88, 867-893.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fiva, J. H. (2006). New evidence on the effect of fiscal decentralization on the size and composition of government spending. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 62(2), 250-280.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gramlich, E. M., & D. S. Laren (1984). Migration and income redistribution responsibilities. The Journal of Human Resources, 19(4), 489-511.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Granado, A. Z., F. Javier , J. Martinez-Vazquez , & R. McNab (2005). Fiscal decentralization and the functional composition of public expenditures. International Studies Program Working Paper Series0501. International Studies Program, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University. Retrieved November 20, 2009, from http://aysps.gsu.edu/isp/files/ispwp0501.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grossman G. M., & E. Helpman (1994). Protection for sale. The American Economic Review, 84(4), 833-850.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hadri, K. (2002). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 3(2), 148-161.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Haggard, S., & R. R. Kaufman (2008). Development, democracy, and welfare states. New Jersey: Preston University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hemmings, P., D. Turner, & S. Parviainen (2003). Enhancing the effectiveness of public spending in Finland. OECD Economic Department Working Papers. Retrieved November 20, 2009, from http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2003doc.nsf/LinkTo/NT00004106/$FILE/JT00146242.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Im, K. S., M. H. Pesaran, & Y. Shin (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Ecometrics, 115(1), 53-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jarque, C., & A. Bera. (1980). Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters 6, 255–259.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jin, J., & H. F. Zou (2002). How does fiscal decentralization affectzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) aggregate, national, and subnational government size? Journal of Urban Economics, 52(2), 270-293.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Joumard, I., & P. M. Kongsrud (2003). Fiscal relations across government levels. OECD Economic Studies No.36. Retrieved November 20, 2009, fromzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kaufman R. R., & A. Segura-Ubiergo (2001). Globalization, domestic politics, and social spending in Latin America: a time-series cross-section analysis, 1973-97. World Politics, 53(4), 553-587.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) King, D., & Y. Ma (2001). Fiscal decentralization, central bank independence, and inflation. Economics Letters 72, 95–98.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Korpi W., & J. Palme (2003). New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95. American Political Science Review 97(3), 425-446.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lake D. A., & M. A. Baum (2001). The invisible hand of democracy: political control and the provision of public services. Comparative Political Studies. From http://spcps.highwire.org/cgi/reprint/34/6/587.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Levin, A., C. F. Lin, & C. S. Chu (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lindert P. H. (1996). What limits social spending? Explorations in Economic History 33, 1–34.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Litvack, Jennie & Jessica Seddon (1999). Decentralization briefing notes. World Bank. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/WBI/Resources/wbi37142.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Marlow M. L. (1988). Fiscal decentralization and government size. U.S. Department of Treasury. Public Choice 56:259-269.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Martinez-Vazquez J., & R. M. McNab (2003). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth. World Development, 31(9), 1597-1616.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Meloche, J. P., F. Vaillancourt, & S. Yilmaz (2004). Decentralization or fiscal autonomy? What does really matter? - Effects on growth and public sector size in European Transition Countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3254. Retrieved February 20, 2010, fromzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2004/04/15/000012009_20040415162715/Rendered/PDF/WPS3254.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mogull R. G. (1978). State and local antipoverty expenditures. Public Finance Review,6, 287-303.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance: A study in public finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Niskanen, W. A. (1975). Bureaucrats and politicians. Journal of Law and Economics 18, 617-643.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal federalism. EUA : Harcourt.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oates, W. (1985).Searching for leviathan: an empirical study. American Economic Review 75, 748-757.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oates, W. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120-1149.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pettersson-Lidbom P., & B. Tyrefors (2007). The policy consequences of direct versus representative democracy: A regression-discontinuity approach. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://people.su.se/~pepet/directdem.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Prohl S., & F. Schneider (2009). Does decentralization reduce government size? a quantitative study of the decentralization hypothesis. Public Finance Review, 37(6), 639-664.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Przeworski, A., M. E. Alvarez, J. A. Cheibub, & F. Limongi (2000). Democracy and Development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Prud`homme, R. (1995). The dangers of decentralization. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://wbro.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/10/2/201.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Razin, A., E. Sadka, & P. Swagel (2002). The aging population and the size of the welfare state. The Journal of Political Economy, 110(4), 900-918.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rodden, J. (2003). Reviving leviathan: fiscal federalism and the growth of government. International Organization 57, 695-729.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have larger governments? Journal of Political Economy 106.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rudra, N., & S. Haggard (2005). Globalization, democracy, and effective welfare spending in the developing world. Comparative Political Studies, 38(9), 1015-1049.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shah, A. (2004). Fiscal decentralization in developing and transition economies: progress, problems, and the promise. Policy Research Working Paper Series 3282, Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/PAKISTANEXTN/Resources/pdf-Files-in-Events/IRISD/FiscalDecentral02.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shah, A. (2005). Fiscal decentralization and fiscal performance. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3786. From http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=873894zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Seabright P. (1996). Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review, 40(1), 61-89.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sears D. O., & J. Citrin (1982). Tax revolt: Something for nothing in California. Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, United States of America.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Snyder, J. M., & I. Yackovlev (2005). Political and Economic Determinants of Government Spending on Social Protection Programs. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://econ-www.mit.edu/files/1207.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Southwick L. (1981). Public welfare programs and recipient migration. Growth and Change, 12 (4), 22-32.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stein E. (1999). Fiscal decentralization and government size in Latin America. Journal of Applied Economics, 2(2), 357-391.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thieβen, Ulrich (2003). Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth in high-income OECD countries, Fiscal Studies, 24 (3), 237-274.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Treisman D. (2002). Defining and measuring decentralization: A global perspective. Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles 4289 Bunche Hall Los Angeles.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Treisman D. (2006). Explaining fiscal decentralization: Geography, colonial history, economic development, and political institutions. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 44(3), 289 – 325..zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tullock, G. (1959). Problems of majority voting. Journal of Political Economy, 67(6), 571-579.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Von Braun, Joachim & Ulrike, Grote (2000). Does decentralization serve the poor? IMF-conference on fiscal decentralization 20-21 November in Washington D. C. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/seminar/2000/fiscal/vonbraun.pdf.Wildavsky, A. (1974). The Politics of the Budgetary Process, 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wildavsky A. & H. Heclo (1974). The private government of public money: Community and policy inside British politics. University of California press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) World Bank (2004). Measuring fiscal decentralization. Data Note. From worldbank.org.zh_TW