| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳秀瑾<br>林從一 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 李伊 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 李伊 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2009 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 13-Oct-2011 13:56:03 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 13-Oct-2011 13:56:03 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 13-Oct-2011 13:56:03 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0096154014 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51660 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 96154014 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 98 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 每一個平等理論所要處理的都是不公平。德沃金藉其具原創性的拍賣會與保險市場思想範例以構建平等一概念，其中最可貴者在於其理論擺脫以量定義平等的窠臼。而藉保健檢視德沃金理論後，我認為對人的平等考量與敏於志向、鈍於稟賦兩項原則是非常值得任何平等理論奉為圭臬者；但其理論中仍有未能全身而退、通過保健檢視的部分。至於可取德沃金理論而代之的平等理論，我目前推薦沈恩的能力取徑，因為它從一個動態的面向來考量平等，而這可能比德沃金的理論前提更貼近事實。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Every egalitarian theory copes with unfairness. R. Dworkin uses his very original auction and insurance market to build the concept of equality without using any concept of being equal in quantity. By the inspection through health to Dworkin’s theory of equality, I found that there are two principles worth adopting in a theory of equality, which are the “equal concern among individuals” and “being ambition sensitive and endowment insensitive.” Others did not pass the inspection through health. As to another theory of equality instead of Dworkin’s, I presently recommend Amartya Sen’s capability approach, which concerns equality from a dynamic aspect of freedom, which might be corresponding more to the fact than the premises of Dworkin’s. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 導論 一、 研究動機 二、 研究方法 三、 以保健面向切入平等 （一） 保健與健康—保健的社會性意涵 （二） 保健與平等 德沃金的平等理論 一、 鈍於稟賦、敏於志向 二、 資源取得的資格－機運與選擇的二分 三、 德沃金平等理論的預設與預期理論後果 以保健檢視德沃金平等理論 一、 保健與平等 二、 保健與機運 三、 保健與選擇 四、 保健與保險 五、 保健與家庭 能力取徑與保健 結論 參考書目 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096154014 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 平等主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 平等 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 保健 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | egalitarianism | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | equality | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | health | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 透過保健檢視德沃金平等理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | An inspection of Dworkin’s theory of equality through health | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、 英文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. Anderson, Elisabeth, 1999,What is the Point of Equality?, Ethics, Vol. 109, Issue 2, pp287-337 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. Arneson, Richard J.,2000, Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism, Ethics, Vol. 110, No.2, , pp339-349 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3. Cohen, G. A., 1989, On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, Ethics, Vol.99, No.4, pp.906-944 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4. Daniels, Norman, Just Health, 2008, Cambridge University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5. Daniels, Norman, 1985, Just Health Care. New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6. Dworkin, Ronald M., 2000, Sovereign Virtue, Harvard University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7. Dworkin, Ronald, 1981, Equality of Welfare, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol.10. No.3, pp.185-246 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8. Frankena, K. William, Ethics, 1963, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9. Kymlicka, Will, 2002, Contemporary Political Philosophy, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 10. Levy, Neil, 2007, Neuroethics, Cambridge University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 11. O’Neil, Martin, What Should Egalitarians Believe? , Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol.36, No. 2, Spring 2008, pp.119-156 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 12. Parfit, Dereck, Reasons and Persons, 1984, Oxford University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 13. Sarah Marchand, Daniel Wikler, Bruce Landesman, Class, Health, and Justice, Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 76, Issue 3, 2002, pp. 449-467 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 14. Sen, Amartya, Development as Freedom, 2000, Anchor Books, New York | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 15. Sen, Amartya, 1996, On the Status of Equality. Political Theory ,24 （3）, pp394-400 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 16. Warren, Mary Ann, 1997, Moral Status, Oxford University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 17. Online Etymology Dictionary, http://www.etymonline.com/ | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 18. Cambridge Dictionaries Online, http://dictionary.cambridge.org/ | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、 中文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. Allen Buchanan，Dan W.Brock，Norman Daniels，Daniel Wikler著，蕭郁雯 譯，從機會到選擇：遺傳學與正義，2004年08月20日，巨流圖書 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. Amartya Sen 著，劉楚俊 譯，倫理與經濟，2000年4月初版，聯經出版 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3. 吳秀瑾，2009，德沃金機運平等觀評論：女性主義批評，政治與社會哲學評論，第28期，頁89-138。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4. 吳秀瑾，2005，依靠與平等：論Kittay愛的勞動，女學學誌，第19期，頁157-183 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5. 王鵬翔, 2008, 「朗諾．德沃金教授其人與思想簡介」， 第一屆雷震民主人權講座，當代思想大師德沃金訪台演講簡介，頁7-11。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6. 楊士奇，2007，論代間正義：一個羅爾斯式的觀點，政治大學哲學系，博士論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7. 孟軻，《孟子》，中國哲學書電子化計畫：http://chinese.dsturgeon.net/index_gb.html | zh_TW |
