Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 從資源依賴的觀點探討組織價值創新:全面解決方案提供者的個案探討
Resource Dependence Perspective of Organizational Value Innovation: Case Study of a Total Solution Provider
作者 陳德川
Chen,Te-Chuan
貢獻者 管康彥
Kuan, Wellington K.
陳德川
Chen,Te-Chuan
關鍵詞 資源管理
核心資源
組織鏈結策略
資源依賴
共生性互賴
競爭性互賴
價值創新
資訊不對稱
策略再思考
全面解決方案
全面解決方案提供者(TSP)
全面解決方案提供者成長曲線圖(TSP成長曲線圖)
全面解決方案提供者成長循環圖(TSP成長循環圖)
EPC(規劃設計、採構調達、建造管理)
Resources management
Core resources
Organizations linkage mechanism
Resource dependence
Symbiotic interdependencies
Competitive interdependencies
Value innovation
Asymmetric information
Strategic rethinking
Total solution
Total solution provider (TSP)
Total solution provider growth curve(TSP growth curve)
Total solution provider growth circle (TSP growth circle)
EPC(Engineering、Procurement、Construction)
日期 2010
上傳時間 14-Oct-2011 14:39:08 (UTC+8)
摘要 創業初期所面對的主要問題就是資源不足的問題,要如何獲取生存與發展所需要的資源是企業的重要課題。首先,企業必須分析內部環境,找出核心資源,並將之發揮在目標事業上,為企業奠定基礎。再者,企業必須分析外部環境,透過各種組織鏈結策略,重新調整與供應商、顧客、甚至是競爭者之間的關係成為策略夥伴關係,選擇並集中核心競爭強項,形成資源互補,提供給客戶一個全面解決方案(Total solution)的服務,以滿足甚至超過顧客預期的需求,使得顧客願意持續購買,企業藉此從環境中獲取關鍵資源並得以持續發展。

本研究透過個案分析發現,組織在成為「全面解決方案提供者(TSP)」的角色過程中,因為市場力量及組織力量的融合過程的不同,我們分析出其發展軌跡可以歸類成為五大類,即「水平整合型的TSP」、「垂直整合型的TSP」、「先水平後垂直整合型的TSP」、「先垂直後水平整合型的TSP」以及「垂直及水平整合並進型的TSP」。這五大類型的發展軌跡基本上描述了組織發展的過程,讓我們更清楚的知道組織成長過程中因為環境因素以及組織因素所造就成的組織面貌。

「TSP成長曲線 (TSP Growth Curve)」的形成過程,是在個案成長過程分析及探討後發現,組織要追求持續成長,單靠本身的資源是受限的,組織必須去整合內外部的資源,包括重新建構核心資源、組織並管理外部資源網絡,透過各樣的鏈結策略使得組織獲取成長所需要的關鍵資源,透過策略再思考重新組織企業架構,建構一個學習性組織平台,鼓勵在這個平台上的每一個人去創新思考,讓組織成員得以在非傳統性架構下去思考,在非秩序中去創新,讓大家願意去共創組織的價值。

研究發現,組織獲取資源並成為TSP的四個步驟為:1.建構組織核心資源與能力2.從環境中獲取關鍵資源3.價值創新成為TSP角色使顧客滿足4.降低對環境依賴,繼續提升高一層次的成長循環。這樣良性的循環讓組織累積更多資源而逐漸壯大,擺脫了創業初期資源不足的困境,組織在壯大的同時因為建立了更多的資源而逐漸降低對於原有環境中的資源依賴,並與環境中資源提供者的關係從依賴變成互賴,此時組織已經提昇到了另一層次的成長循環。這樣的成長循環使得組織得以在不同的環境中獲取不同的資源繼續成長,讓企業一直維持企業生命週期中的成長階段,因而可能避免或延遲了衰退階段的發生。

本研究的特色是從資源依賴的角度出發,探討組織如何透過從環境中獲取成長所需的關鍵資源,並探討組織藉由成為全面解決方案提供者的角色來獲取顧客價值創新,此時組織價值亦跟隨提升。

大部分的企業皆無法規避「出生、成長、成熟、飽和、衰退」的命運,就如同生命會歷經「出生、幼年、青年、壯年、老年」的歷程一般,或許企業無法避免衰退或消失的命運,但是找出「延年益壽」方法來維持壯年期是一個可行的策略。「TSP成長曲線圖」以「TSP成長循環圖」即可以說明企業從「創業成功」到「維持成長」的策略歷程,可以作為企業經營發展的參考。
The major problem in the early stage of entrepreneurship is the shortage of resources, so it is industries’ crucial mission to acquire the resources to sustain and develop its growth. First, industries must analyze its internal environment to identify the core sources and apply them into the target business, to lay the foundation for companies. Second, industries must conduct external analysis with organizations linkage mechanism to re-address the connection among suppliers, customers and even competitors, so that they can become the strategic partners, formulate complimentary resources, concentrate on their own core advantages in the competition. In this way, they can offer customers the service of Total Solution, to meet, even exceed customers’ expectation. Hence, this could sustain customers’ continuous purchase, and industries can keep developing its business by grabbing the crucial resources in the environment.

This research discovered that, due to the different merging processes between market powers and organizations power, there are five categorized patterns when organizations become Total Solution Provides (TSP): horizontal integration TSP, vertical integration TSP, horizontal-to-vertical integration TSP, vertical-to-horizontal integration TSP and simultaneously vertical and horizontal integration TSP. These five patterns basically outline the process of organization development and bring us more diverse pictures caused by different environmental and organizational causes.

After studying cases and formulating of the TSP Growth Curve, this research found out that it is limited to for organizations to pursue the growth by its own resources. Industries must integrate internal and external resources, re-construct the core resources, manage the external resource network, acquire all the necessary resources for further growth through linkage mechanism, rethink the structure of the business, establish the learning platform to encourage its member to jointly create the value for the organizations, contemplate beyond the boundary of tradition and innovate without order.

There are four steps for the organizations to acquire resources and formulate the TSP Growth Curve: 1. Constructing the core resources and capability of the organizations; 2.Acquireing the core resources from the environment; 3.Becoming TSP with value innovation and satisfy the customers; 4.Lowering the dependence on the environment and upgrading the Growth circle. Organizations can grow stronger, accumulate more resources with this benign circle and leave the dilemma of insufficient resources. In this way, organizations can receive more resources than ever; it can also turn the relationship between organizations and supplier from unilateral dependence to mutual dependence and TSP Growth circle will also be upgraded while they are growing bigger. This growth circle can continuously sustain its development by collecting different resources in different environments. Hence, the stage of growth will be prolonged, and the stage of recession will be avoided of delayed.

Based on the Resources dependence theory, this research has discussed how organizations obtain the crucial resources from the environment to generate growth, and also analyzed that when organizations obtain customers’ value innovation by playing TSP, organizations’ value will also raise consecutively.

Most industries can not avoid the linear destiny of establishment, growth, maturity, saturation and recession as well as human’s life stage of birth, child, youth, adult and aging. Industries may not genuinely ward off the consequence of decline or disappearance, but it’s still workable to figure out a strategy to prolong the period of maturity. TSP Growth Curve and TSP Growth Circle can well explain the industries’ process from the stage of “entrepreneurship” to “the maintenance of growth”, and also offer the positive example for business operation.
參考文獻 一、 中文文獻與論文
1. 方博亮及林祖嘉(2008),「管理經濟學」,智勝文化出版社,台北市,三版, 第382~418頁, 第464~492頁, 第502~534頁。
2. 司徒達賢(2009),「策略管理新論」,智勝文化出版,台北。
3. 司徒達賢(2003),「策略管理案例解析觀念與實例」,智勝文化出版,台北。
4. 台灣經濟部能源局(2010),「2010年能源產業技術白皮書」,台北。
5. 李雪莉(2010年1月),「北歐未來學大師歐爾森,分享給愈多人,愈有價值」,天下雜誌, 第100~102頁。
6. 吳思華(2003),「策略九說-策略思考的本質」,臉譜出版,邦城文化事業股份有限公司,台北,三版。
7. 吳靜吉(2005年10月),「生手需要良師益友」,今周刊第462期,台北, 第12頁。
8. 吳振海(2007),「不對稱創新:挑戰者的成功之道」,北京師範大學出版社。
9. 徐立研譯(2010),Dan Senor & Saul Singer著,「新創企業之國-以色列經濟奇蹟的啟示(Start-Up Nation: The Story of Israel's Economic Miracle)」,木馬文化事業股份有限公司,台北。
10. 唐錦超譯(2004),Richard Foster and Sarah Kaplan合著,「創造性破壞-市場攻擊者與長青企業的競爭(Creative Destruction)」,遠流出版事業股份有限公司,台北。
11. 陳淑梅(2005),「價值創造導向之現代日本企業轉型」,政治大學,企業管理學系,碩士論文。
12. 梁善柏(2005),「競合關係、競合機制與資源整合-以台中港貨櫃碼頭現有業主為例」,東海大學,碩士在職專班,碩士論文。
13. 張逸民(2008),「策略管理-分析架構與實例」,華泰文化事業股份有限公司,台北,二版。
14. 楊仁壽、許碧芬、俞慧芸合譯,Gareth R. Jones(2007),「組織理論與管理,理論與個案(Organizational Theory,Design,and Change)」,台灣培生教育出版股份有限公司,第四版。
15. 管康彥(1996),「21世紀之企業新挑戰」,戰略生產力雜誌第490期, 第67~69頁。
16. 管康彥(1997),「組織演進的四大階段」,能力雜誌第504期,第140~145頁。
17. 管康彥(1997),「跨世紀企業管理新趨勢-組織設計之新思維」,能力雜誌第502期, 第118~121頁。
18. 管康彥(1999年12月),「顧客導向的組織變革」,EMBA雜誌第160期。
19. 趙道致及張靚(2006),「資源杠桿-基于企業網絡的競爭優勢獲取模式」,科學與科學技術管理期刊,天津大學管理學院,天津,第9期。
20. 蔡政賢(2007),「中小型IC設計公司轉型策略之研究」,台灣大學,管理學院碩士在職專班,碩士論文。
21. 蔡漢章撰(2004),「代工廠商與品牌商動態協力合作演進之研究-筆記型電腦產業中價值能力移轉個案探索」,中央大學,資訊管理研究所,碩士論文。
22. 錢德勒(Alfred Chandler)(1962),「策略與結構 (Strategy and Structure)」。
23. 魏騰輝(2003),「台灣工程機構之經營策略-以中鼎工程公司為例」,中山大學,高階經營碩士學程碩士在職專班,碩士論文。
24. 顧淑馨譯,Hamel, Gary & Prahalad, C. K.(2004),「競爭大未來(Competing for The Future)」,智庫文化,台北。
二、 英文文獻
1. Anderson, J. V. (1992) “Weirder than Fiction: The Reality and Myth of Creativity”, Academy of Management Executive, 6, pp.40~46.
2. Campbell, A., Alexander, Marcus & Goold, Michael (1994) Corporate-Level Strategy: Creating Value in the Multibusiness Company, John Wiley & Sons.
3. Carlton, D.W. & Perloff, J.M. (1990) Modern Industrial Organization, Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
4. De Kare-Silver, Michael (1998) Strategy in Crisis: Why Business Urgently Needs a Completely New Approach.
5. Drucker, P. F. (1954) The Practice of Management, New York: Haper and Row Publishers.
6. Galaskiewicz, J. (1985) “Interorganizational Relations” Annual Review of Sociology.
7. Holt, Svetlana & Jones Steve (2005) “Emotional Intelligence and Organizational Performance”, Performance Improvement.
8. Kanter, R. M. (1983) The Change Masters, New York: Simon and Schuster.
9. Kim, W. Chan & Mauborgne, Ren (2006) Blue Ocean Strategy.
10. Leblebichi, H. & Salanick, G. R. (1982) “Stability in Interorganizational Exchanges: Rule-marking Processes in the Chicago Board of Trade”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.27, pp.227-242.
11. Markides, C. (1999) “A Dynamic View of Strategy”, Sloan Management Review, Vol.40, Iss.3, pp.55~63.
12. Milgrom, Paul & Robert, John (1992) Organization and Management, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
13. Pfeffer, J. & Salanick, G. R. (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependency Perspective, Harper and Row Publishers, New York.
14. Pfeffer, J. (1972) “Merger as a Response to Organizational Interdependence”,Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.17, pp.383-394.
15. Penrose (1959), The theory of the growth of the firm, in Foss, N.J.(Eds.), Resources Firms and Strategic.
16. Schumpeter, Joseph Alois (1934) The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
17. Selznick, P. (1949) TVA and the Grassroots, Harper and Row, New York.
18. Stevenson, H. H. (1976) “Defining corporate strengths and weaknesses”, Sloan Management Review.
19. Wernerfelt, Birger (1984) “A resource based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal.
20. Williamson, O. E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies, New York:The Free Press.
21. Williamson, O. E. (1979) “The Governance of Contractual Relationships”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.22, pp.232-261.
三、 報導與網站
1. Alon Tal,“以色列國家報告,2003年至2005年:聯合國沙漠化防制公約” ,2006, http://www.unccd.int.cop/reports/otheraffected/national/2006/israel-eng.pdf
2. EMBA雜誌網站,http://www.emba.com.tw/ShowArticleCon.asp?artid=3022
3. IEA(International Energy Agency),World Energy Outlook 2007,http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/docs/weo2007/WEO_2007_Chinese.pdf
4. IEA(International Energy Agency),World Energy Outlook 2009,http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/docs/weo2009/WEO2009_es_chinese.pdf
5. 中國德州2010年第四屆世界太陽城大會官方網站,http://www.chinasolarcity.com.cn/Html/zhxw/191046672.html
6. 台灣工業銀行,綜合研究所網站,http://www.ibt.com.tw/UserFiles/File/960409-Indus.pdf
7. 台達電子工業股份有限公司網站,http://www.deltaww.com/,http://www.delta.com.tw/ch/index.asp
8. 耐滴芬(Netafim)台灣分公司網站,http://netafim-taiwan.myweb.hinet.net/
9. 泰創工程股份有限公司網站,http://tech-top-eng.com/
10. 皇明太陽能官方網站,http://www.himin.com/Index.html
11. 猶太國家基金網站,http://www.kkl.org.il/kkl/english/main_subject/globalwarming/israeli%20research%20has%20worldwide%20implications.x
12. 萬方數據知識服務平台,http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/,http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_kxxykxjsgl200609034.aspx
13. 諾貝爾獎官方網站,Robert M. Solow,1987,Growth Theory and After(成長力理論及後續),http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1987/solow-lecture.html
14. 綠能科技股份有限公司網站,http://www.getinc.com.tw/
15. 德商精矽九陽能源系統股份有限公司網站,http://www.abakus.com.tw/
16. 魏茨曼學院亞提爾森林研究小組網站,http://www.weizmann.ac.il/ESER/People/Yakir/YATIR/Yatir.htm
17. MBA智庫百科網站,http://www.mbalib.com/
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
96932409
99
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096932409
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 管康彥zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Kuan, Wellington K.en_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳德川zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chen,Te-Chuanen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳德川zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen,Te-Chuanen_US
dc.date (日期) 2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned 14-Oct-2011 14:39:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 14-Oct-2011 14:39:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 14-Oct-2011 14:39:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0096932409en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51697-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96932409zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 創業初期所面對的主要問題就是資源不足的問題,要如何獲取生存與發展所需要的資源是企業的重要課題。首先,企業必須分析內部環境,找出核心資源,並將之發揮在目標事業上,為企業奠定基礎。再者,企業必須分析外部環境,透過各種組織鏈結策略,重新調整與供應商、顧客、甚至是競爭者之間的關係成為策略夥伴關係,選擇並集中核心競爭強項,形成資源互補,提供給客戶一個全面解決方案(Total solution)的服務,以滿足甚至超過顧客預期的需求,使得顧客願意持續購買,企業藉此從環境中獲取關鍵資源並得以持續發展。

本研究透過個案分析發現,組織在成為「全面解決方案提供者(TSP)」的角色過程中,因為市場力量及組織力量的融合過程的不同,我們分析出其發展軌跡可以歸類成為五大類,即「水平整合型的TSP」、「垂直整合型的TSP」、「先水平後垂直整合型的TSP」、「先垂直後水平整合型的TSP」以及「垂直及水平整合並進型的TSP」。這五大類型的發展軌跡基本上描述了組織發展的過程,讓我們更清楚的知道組織成長過程中因為環境因素以及組織因素所造就成的組織面貌。

「TSP成長曲線 (TSP Growth Curve)」的形成過程,是在個案成長過程分析及探討後發現,組織要追求持續成長,單靠本身的資源是受限的,組織必須去整合內外部的資源,包括重新建構核心資源、組織並管理外部資源網絡,透過各樣的鏈結策略使得組織獲取成長所需要的關鍵資源,透過策略再思考重新組織企業架構,建構一個學習性組織平台,鼓勵在這個平台上的每一個人去創新思考,讓組織成員得以在非傳統性架構下去思考,在非秩序中去創新,讓大家願意去共創組織的價值。

研究發現,組織獲取資源並成為TSP的四個步驟為:1.建構組織核心資源與能力2.從環境中獲取關鍵資源3.價值創新成為TSP角色使顧客滿足4.降低對環境依賴,繼續提升高一層次的成長循環。這樣良性的循環讓組織累積更多資源而逐漸壯大,擺脫了創業初期資源不足的困境,組織在壯大的同時因為建立了更多的資源而逐漸降低對於原有環境中的資源依賴,並與環境中資源提供者的關係從依賴變成互賴,此時組織已經提昇到了另一層次的成長循環。這樣的成長循環使得組織得以在不同的環境中獲取不同的資源繼續成長,讓企業一直維持企業生命週期中的成長階段,因而可能避免或延遲了衰退階段的發生。

本研究的特色是從資源依賴的角度出發,探討組織如何透過從環境中獲取成長所需的關鍵資源,並探討組織藉由成為全面解決方案提供者的角色來獲取顧客價值創新,此時組織價值亦跟隨提升。

大部分的企業皆無法規避「出生、成長、成熟、飽和、衰退」的命運,就如同生命會歷經「出生、幼年、青年、壯年、老年」的歷程一般,或許企業無法避免衰退或消失的命運,但是找出「延年益壽」方法來維持壯年期是一個可行的策略。「TSP成長曲線圖」以「TSP成長循環圖」即可以說明企業從「創業成功」到「維持成長」的策略歷程,可以作為企業經營發展的參考。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The major problem in the early stage of entrepreneurship is the shortage of resources, so it is industries’ crucial mission to acquire the resources to sustain and develop its growth. First, industries must analyze its internal environment to identify the core sources and apply them into the target business, to lay the foundation for companies. Second, industries must conduct external analysis with organizations linkage mechanism to re-address the connection among suppliers, customers and even competitors, so that they can become the strategic partners, formulate complimentary resources, concentrate on their own core advantages in the competition. In this way, they can offer customers the service of Total Solution, to meet, even exceed customers’ expectation. Hence, this could sustain customers’ continuous purchase, and industries can keep developing its business by grabbing the crucial resources in the environment.

This research discovered that, due to the different merging processes between market powers and organizations power, there are five categorized patterns when organizations become Total Solution Provides (TSP): horizontal integration TSP, vertical integration TSP, horizontal-to-vertical integration TSP, vertical-to-horizontal integration TSP and simultaneously vertical and horizontal integration TSP. These five patterns basically outline the process of organization development and bring us more diverse pictures caused by different environmental and organizational causes.

After studying cases and formulating of the TSP Growth Curve, this research found out that it is limited to for organizations to pursue the growth by its own resources. Industries must integrate internal and external resources, re-construct the core resources, manage the external resource network, acquire all the necessary resources for further growth through linkage mechanism, rethink the structure of the business, establish the learning platform to encourage its member to jointly create the value for the organizations, contemplate beyond the boundary of tradition and innovate without order.

There are four steps for the organizations to acquire resources and formulate the TSP Growth Curve: 1. Constructing the core resources and capability of the organizations; 2.Acquireing the core resources from the environment; 3.Becoming TSP with value innovation and satisfy the customers; 4.Lowering the dependence on the environment and upgrading the Growth circle. Organizations can grow stronger, accumulate more resources with this benign circle and leave the dilemma of insufficient resources. In this way, organizations can receive more resources than ever; it can also turn the relationship between organizations and supplier from unilateral dependence to mutual dependence and TSP Growth circle will also be upgraded while they are growing bigger. This growth circle can continuously sustain its development by collecting different resources in different environments. Hence, the stage of growth will be prolonged, and the stage of recession will be avoided of delayed.

Based on the Resources dependence theory, this research has discussed how organizations obtain the crucial resources from the environment to generate growth, and also analyzed that when organizations obtain customers’ value innovation by playing TSP, organizations’ value will also raise consecutively.

Most industries can not avoid the linear destiny of establishment, growth, maturity, saturation and recession as well as human’s life stage of birth, child, youth, adult and aging. Industries may not genuinely ward off the consequence of decline or disappearance, but it’s still workable to figure out a strategy to prolong the period of maturity. TSP Growth Curve and TSP Growth Circle can well explain the industries’ process from the stage of “entrepreneurship” to “the maintenance of growth”, and also offer the positive example for business operation.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第壹章 緒論……………………………………………………………1  
第一節 研究背景與動機……………………………………………1
第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………5
第三節 研究方法……………………………………………………6
第四節 研究架構與流程……………………………………………7
第五節 研究限制……………………………………………………9

第貳章 文獻探討…………………………………………………… 10
第一節 組織資源管理…………………………………………… 10
第二節 資源依賴與組織鏈結策略……………………………… 19
第三節 策略再思考……………………………………………… 25
第四節 價值創新………………………………………………… 32
第五節 全面解決方案…………………………………………… 41

第參章 個案企業描述……………………………………………… 44
第一節 產業環境分析…………………………………………… 44
第二節 成長歷程………………………………………………… 47
第三節 功能政策與組織型態…………………………………… 55
第四節 策略型態與競爭優勢…………………………………… 60
第五節 經營績效………………………………………………… 68

第肆章 個案新事業運用發展……………………………………… 72
第一節 從核心領域中發現潛在新事業商機…………………… 72
第二節 新事業的未來發展性評估……………………………… 74
第三節 新事業從環境中獲取關鍵資源的可行性評估………… 76
第四節 政府政策對於新事業的影響評估……………………… 76
第五節 組織定位策略…………………………………………… 78
第六節 鏈結策略………………………………………………… 80
第七節 新事業未來發展………………………………………… 86

第伍章 個案企業的經營策略分析………………………………… 89
第一節 垂直整合型的解決方案提供者策略……………………… 89
第二節 水平整合型的解決方案提供者策略……………………… 91
第三節 以創新專案組織形態進行鏈結策略……………………… 93
第四節 善用資訊不對稱優勢來進行訂價策略…………………… 95
第五節 與客戶一起成長策略……………………………………… 97

第陸章 結論與建議………………………………………………… 98
第一節 研究結論,全面解決方案提供者成長曲線
(TSP Growth Curve)之模式建構……………………… 98
第二節 管理意涵,全面解決方案提供者對於組織價值創新
的意涵………………………………………………………103
TSP成長循環圖(TSP Growth Circle)
TSP成長循環螺旋圖(TSP Growth Spiral Chart)
第三節 後續研究建議………………………………………………108

參考文獻………………………………………………………………110

附件一: A公司陳董事長的訪談紀錄………………………………116
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096932409en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資源管理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 核心資源zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 組織鏈結策略zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資源依賴zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 共生性互賴zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 競爭性互賴zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 價值創新zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資訊不對稱zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 策略再思考zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 全面解決方案zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 全面解決方案提供者(TSP)zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 全面解決方案提供者成長曲線圖(TSP成長曲線圖)zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 全面解決方案提供者成長循環圖(TSP成長循環圖)zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) EPC(規劃設計、採構調達、建造管理)zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Resources managementen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Core resourcesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Organizations linkage mechanismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Resource dependenceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Symbiotic interdependenciesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Competitive interdependenciesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Value innovationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Asymmetric informationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Strategic rethinkingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Total solutionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Total solution provider (TSP)en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Total solution provider growth curve(TSP growth curve)en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Total solution provider growth circle (TSP growth circle)en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) EPC(Engineering、Procurement、Construction)en_US
dc.title (題名) 從資源依賴的觀點探討組織價值創新:全面解決方案提供者的個案探討zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Resource Dependence Perspective of Organizational Value Innovation: Case Study of a Total Solution Provideren_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、 中文文獻與論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. 方博亮及林祖嘉(2008),「管理經濟學」,智勝文化出版社,台北市,三版, 第382~418頁, 第464~492頁, 第502~534頁。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. 司徒達賢(2009),「策略管理新論」,智勝文化出版,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. 司徒達賢(2003),「策略管理案例解析觀念與實例」,智勝文化出版,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. 台灣經濟部能源局(2010),「2010年能源產業技術白皮書」,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. 李雪莉(2010年1月),「北歐未來學大師歐爾森,分享給愈多人,愈有價值」,天下雜誌, 第100~102頁。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. 吳思華(2003),「策略九說-策略思考的本質」,臉譜出版,邦城文化事業股份有限公司,台北,三版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. 吳靜吉(2005年10月),「生手需要良師益友」,今周刊第462期,台北, 第12頁。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. 吳振海(2007),「不對稱創新:挑戰者的成功之道」,北京師範大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. 徐立研譯(2010),Dan Senor & Saul Singer著,「新創企業之國-以色列經濟奇蹟的啟示(Start-Up Nation: The Story of Israel's Economic Miracle)」,木馬文化事業股份有限公司,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. 唐錦超譯(2004),Richard Foster and Sarah Kaplan合著,「創造性破壞-市場攻擊者與長青企業的競爭(Creative Destruction)」,遠流出版事業股份有限公司,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. 陳淑梅(2005),「價值創造導向之現代日本企業轉型」,政治大學,企業管理學系,碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. 梁善柏(2005),「競合關係、競合機制與資源整合-以台中港貨櫃碼頭現有業主為例」,東海大學,碩士在職專班,碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13. 張逸民(2008),「策略管理-分析架構與實例」,華泰文化事業股份有限公司,台北,二版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14. 楊仁壽、許碧芬、俞慧芸合譯,Gareth R. Jones(2007),「組織理論與管理,理論與個案(Organizational Theory,Design,and Change)」,台灣培生教育出版股份有限公司,第四版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15. 管康彥(1996),「21世紀之企業新挑戰」,戰略生產力雜誌第490期, 第67~69頁。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16. 管康彥(1997),「組織演進的四大階段」,能力雜誌第504期,第140~145頁。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17. 管康彥(1997),「跨世紀企業管理新趨勢-組織設計之新思維」,能力雜誌第502期, 第118~121頁。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18. 管康彥(1999年12月),「顧客導向的組織變革」,EMBA雜誌第160期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19. 趙道致及張靚(2006),「資源杠桿-基于企業網絡的競爭優勢獲取模式」,科學與科學技術管理期刊,天津大學管理學院,天津,第9期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20. 蔡政賢(2007),「中小型IC設計公司轉型策略之研究」,台灣大學,管理學院碩士在職專班,碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21. 蔡漢章撰(2004),「代工廠商與品牌商動態協力合作演進之研究-筆記型電腦產業中價值能力移轉個案探索」,中央大學,資訊管理研究所,碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22. 錢德勒(Alfred Chandler)(1962),「策略與結構 (Strategy and Structure)」。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23. 魏騰輝(2003),「台灣工程機構之經營策略-以中鼎工程公司為例」,中山大學,高階經營碩士學程碩士在職專班,碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24. 顧淑馨譯,Hamel, Gary & Prahalad, C. K.(2004),「競爭大未來(Competing for The Future)」,智庫文化,台北。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、 英文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. Anderson, J. V. (1992) “Weirder than Fiction: The Reality and Myth of Creativity”, Academy of Management Executive, 6, pp.40~46.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. Campbell, A., Alexander, Marcus & Goold, Michael (1994) Corporate-Level Strategy: Creating Value in the Multibusiness Company, John Wiley & Sons.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. Carlton, D.W. & Perloff, J.M. (1990) Modern Industrial Organization, Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. De Kare-Silver, Michael (1998) Strategy in Crisis: Why Business Urgently Needs a Completely New Approach.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. Drucker, P. F. (1954) The Practice of Management, New York: Haper and Row Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. Galaskiewicz, J. (1985) “Interorganizational Relations” Annual Review of Sociology.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. Holt, Svetlana & Jones Steve (2005) “Emotional Intelligence and Organizational Performance”, Performance Improvement.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. Kanter, R. M. (1983) The Change Masters, New York: Simon and Schuster.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. Kim, W. Chan & Mauborgne, Ren (2006) Blue Ocean Strategy.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. Leblebichi, H. & Salanick, G. R. (1982) “Stability in Interorganizational Exchanges: Rule-marking Processes in the Chicago Board of Trade”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.27, pp.227-242.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. Markides, C. (1999) “A Dynamic View of Strategy”, Sloan Management Review, Vol.40, Iss.3, pp.55~63.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. Milgrom, Paul & Robert, John (1992) Organization and Management, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13. Pfeffer, J. & Salanick, G. R. (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependency Perspective, Harper and Row Publishers, New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14. Pfeffer, J. (1972) “Merger as a Response to Organizational Interdependence”,Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.17, pp.383-394.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15. Penrose (1959), The theory of the growth of the firm, in Foss, N.J.(Eds.), Resources Firms and Strategic.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16. Schumpeter, Joseph Alois (1934) The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17. Selznick, P. (1949) TVA and the Grassroots, Harper and Row, New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18. Stevenson, H. H. (1976) “Defining corporate strengths and weaknesses”, Sloan Management Review.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19. Wernerfelt, Birger (1984) “A resource based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20. Williamson, O. E. (1975) Markets and Hierarchies, New York:The Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21. Williamson, O. E. (1979) “The Governance of Contractual Relationships”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.22, pp.232-261.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 三、 報導與網站zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. Alon Tal,“以色列國家報告,2003年至2005年:聯合國沙漠化防制公約” ,2006, http://www.unccd.int.cop/reports/otheraffected/national/2006/israel-eng.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. EMBA雜誌網站,http://www.emba.com.tw/ShowArticleCon.asp?artid=3022zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. IEA(International Energy Agency),World Energy Outlook 2007,http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/docs/weo2007/WEO_2007_Chinese.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. IEA(International Energy Agency),World Energy Outlook 2009,http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/docs/weo2009/WEO2009_es_chinese.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. 中國德州2010年第四屆世界太陽城大會官方網站,http://www.chinasolarcity.com.cn/Html/zhxw/191046672.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. 台灣工業銀行,綜合研究所網站,http://www.ibt.com.tw/UserFiles/File/960409-Indus.pdfzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. 台達電子工業股份有限公司網站,http://www.deltaww.com/,http://www.delta.com.tw/ch/index.aspzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. 耐滴芬(Netafim)台灣分公司網站,http://netafim-taiwan.myweb.hinet.net/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. 泰創工程股份有限公司網站,http://tech-top-eng.com/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. 皇明太陽能官方網站,http://www.himin.com/Index.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. 猶太國家基金網站,http://www.kkl.org.il/kkl/english/main_subject/globalwarming/israeli%20research%20has%20worldwide%20implications.xzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. 萬方數據知識服務平台,http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/,http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_kxxykxjsgl200609034.aspxzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13. 諾貝爾獎官方網站,Robert M. Solow,1987,Growth Theory and After(成長力理論及後續),http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/1987/solow-lecture.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14. 綠能科技股份有限公司網站,http://www.getinc.com.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15. 德商精矽九陽能源系統股份有限公司網站,http://www.abakus.com.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16. 魏茨曼學院亞提爾森林研究小組網站,http://www.weizmann.ac.il/ESER/People/Yakir/YATIR/Yatir.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17. MBA智庫百科網站,http://www.mbalib.com/zh_TW