1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 外國語文學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 重塑愛麗絲：愛麗絲在仙境與鏡中世界的自我及空間經驗
Refiguring the two Alices: Alice’s Spatial Experiences and self in wonderland and looking-glass
作者 陳凱琳
Chen, Kai Lin
貢獻者 何艾克
Heroux, Erick
陳凱琳
Chen, Kai Lin
關鍵詞 路易士‧卡洛爾
平滑空間
褶縐空間
閾限
儀式理論
身體再現
Lewis Carroll
smooth space
striated space
liminality
rites of passage
bodily representation
日期 2011
上傳時間 12-四月-2012 13:47:09 (UTC+8)
摘要 路易士‧卡洛爾的《愛麗絲夢遊記》(Alice in Wonderland, 1865) 及《穿越明鏡》(Through the Looking-Glass, 1871) 是十九世紀極為出名的兒童文學。兩本書中都描述一位名為愛麗絲的女孩如何進入一個奇幻的國度而展開旅程，以及當中她所遇見的各種角色。這兩本書不只豐富有趣，更充滿了諧擬以及邏輯和文字遊戲，使其成為現今許多學者研究的對象。但是，兩本書的相似性使得一般讀者或是學者在閱讀時，都將其視為同一則故事。然而，在仔細探索後，會發現卡洛爾在寫作過程中，很明顯地把兩本書做了區分。本論文因此試圖將兩本書進行比較分析，來重新檢視兩個奇幻世界以及兩個愛麗絲的差異性。
      本文第一章為概論，簡單介紹卡洛爾及其兩本作品。第二章運用德勒茲和加達利的概念，針對仙境與鏡中世界的空間的進行比較。從文本例證中可看出，第一本書中的仙境近似一個「平滑空間」(smooth space)，而第二本中的鏡中世界則如同一個「褶縐空間」(striated space)。此差異性更凸顯了這兩段故事的不同。第三章主要應用透納的理論來探討主角愛麗絲與兩個空間的關係。透納利用范‧杰內普的「儀式理論」(rites of passage)發展出「閾限」(liminality)的觀念，並用此觀念來解讀正在進行生命儀式的個體以及其所屬的階段。許多學者認為兩段故事是在描述愛麗絲長大的過程，因此她的旅程可被視為她經歷生命儀式─成年禮的歷程。然而，雖然兩本書中的兩個空間均可被視為一種「閾限空間」(liminal space)，但只有鏡中世界塑造了一個成功的生命儀式，使愛麗絲在最後得以達到象徵性的成年。另一方面，由於仙境中缺乏線性進展，無法構成一個有效的生命儀式，導致第一本書中的愛麗絲到最後還是以小孩之姿結束在此空間的旅程。第四章援引兩位學者的文章來探討愛麗絲在兩個空間中身體呈現的差異以及和愛麗絲自我發展的相關性。由於愛麗絲在仙境中維持一個小孩的身分，她的身體與行為不會造成社會的威脅，在空間中也就不會受任何拘束。反之，在愛麗絲即將長大的鏡中世界中，其女性的身體卻必須受到限制。因此，在鏡中世界的愛麗絲不僅身體未出現任何變化，她的任何身體的慾望也必須受到克制。這與在第一本書中的身體再現是全然迥異的。第五章則是本文的結論；總結這兩本書的差異性，而身為讀者的我們也應正視其中的區別，進而能夠更加了解卡洛爾筆下的兩個奇幻世界以及兩位均名為愛麗絲的主角。
Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass have brought laughter to children as they journey with Alice through the fantasy worlds ever since their first publication in the 19th century. Filled with Carroll’s witty parodies and plays of logic, the books quickly become two of the most widely studied children fantasies. Both books are about a little girl named Alice who crosses a barrier and enters a fantastical dream world, in which she meets a variety of strange creatures. With the similarity of structures, the two books are often regarded as one single work in modern days. However, upon close examination, it is quite evident that the two works are of entirely different entities, and should be read accordingly. In my thesis, I explore the possibility of reading the books separately by comparing and contrasting Carroll’s creation of the two worlds, as well as the two different developments of Alice within the books.
      In chapter one, I give an overall summary of the author and a brief introduction of the background of the Alices. Chapter two focuses on the two spaces of Wonderland and Looking-Glass World. Using Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s notion of smooth and striated space, this chapter delineates how Wonderland is more like a smooth space with its rhizomatic routes and a lack of center, whereas the linearity of Looking-Glass World appears to be closer to a striated space. This critical difference highlights the individualization between the two worlds.
      Chapter three investigates the relationship between Alice and the two spaces by adopting Victor Turner’s concept. Drawing on Arnold van Gennep’s notion of the rites of passage, Turner proposes the concept of liminality, which is the state of an individual when he or she is undergoing a rite of passage. Most scholars suggest that both Alice books depict Alice’s development to adulthood, which makes Alice’s journeys through the two worlds rites of passage. However, while both spaces can be said to be liminal spaces for Alice, only Looking-Glass World constitutes a completed rite of passage for her, in which she reaches a symbolic maturity at the end. With no linear progression, Wonderland fails to be a rite of passage, and hence Alice comes out still as the child she is going in.
      Chapter four concentrates on the bodily manifestation of Alice, and how they relate to the difference in Alice’s self development in the two books. Drawing on Donald Rackin’s and Anna Krugovoy Silver’s articles, I find that Alice’s exuberant bodily manifestation and vigorous expression of bodily desires in Wonderland is due to the fact that Alice remains a young child, and that her immature body does not cause a threat to the Victorian society. Hence, Carroll allows her to be the fully embodied girl in the first book. In Looking-Glass World, in which Alice is on the verge of growing up, her body must be restrained. Thus, her body stays static and her bodily desires are contained, very different from the bodily representation in the first book.
      In Wonderland and Looking-Glass, Carroll has created two very enchanting stories, with two distinctive fantasy worlds and two separate developments of Alice. Conclusively, I believe that Carroll meant for them to be treated as two separate books, with two different spaces of the dream worlds and two protagonists by the name of Alice.
參考文獻 Auerbach, Nina. “Alice in Wonderland: A Curious Child.” Modern Critical Reviews:
Lewis Carroll. Ed. and Introd. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House, 1987. 31-44.
Baum, Alwin L. “Carroll’s Alices: The Semiotics of Paradox.” Modern Critical
Reviews: Lewis Carroll. Ed. and Introd. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House, 1987. 65-81.
Babcock, Babara A. “Mud, Mirror, and Making up: Liminality and Reflexivity in
Between the Acts.” Victor Turner and the Construction of Cultural Criticism. Ed. Kathleen M. Ashley. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990. 86-116.
Bivona, Daniel. “Alice the Child-Imperialist and the Games of Wonderland.”
Nineteenth-Century Fiction 41.2 (1986): 143-171.
Bogue, Ronald. Deleuze’s Way: Essays in Transverse Ethics and Aesthetics. Vermont:
Ashgate Publishing, 2007.
Bordo, Susan. “The Reproduction of Femininity.” Female Embodiment and Feminist
Theory. Ed. Katie Conboy et al. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997. 90-110.
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans.
Richard Nice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984.
Bunnell, Peter C. “Introduction.” Lewis Carroll: Photographer. Roger Taylor and
Edward Wakeling. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002.
vii-xv.
Carroll, Lewis. Alice’s Adventure in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass. Illus. John Tenniel. Introd. and Notes. Roger Lancelyn Green. New York: Oxford UP, 1982.
---. “Alice on the Stage.” Alice in Wonderland: A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. Donald J. Gray. New York: Norton, 1992. 280-282.
Cixous, Helene and Marie Maclean. “Introduction to Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass and The Hunting of the Snark.” New Literary History 13.2 (1982): 231-251.
Cohen, Morton N., ed. The Selected Letters of Lewis Carroll. London: Macmillan, 1989.
Coveney, Peter. “Escape.” Alice in Wonderland: A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. Donald J. Gray. New York: Norton, 1992. 327-334.
Cresswell, Tim. Place: A Short Introduction. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
Deleuze, Gilles. The Logic of Sense. Tr. Mark Lester. London: Continuum, 2004.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and
Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1987.
Douglas, Mary. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo.
New York: Routledge, 2003.
Drawmer, Lois. “The Dysmorphic Bodies of Alice in Wonderland.” Monsters and the
Monstrous: Myths and Metaphors of Enduring Evil. Vol. 4. Ed. Paul L. Yoder and Peter Mario Kreuter. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press, 2004. 273-284.
Empson, William. “The Child as Swain.” Alice in Wonderland: A Norton Critical
Edition. Ed. Donald J. Gray. New York: Norton, 1992. 344-357.
Foucault, Michel. “Of Other Spaces.” Trans. Jay Miskowiec. Diacritics 16.1 (1986):
22-27.
Gardner, Martin. The Annotated Alice: The Definitive Edition. New York: Norton,
2000.
Gordon, Jan B. “The Alice Books and the Metaphors of Victorian Childhood.”Modern
Critical Reviews: Lewis Carroll. Ed. and Introd. Harold Bloom. New York:
Chelsea House, 1987. 17-30.
Gutting, Gary. French Philosophy in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge UP, 2001.
Hargreaves, Alice. “The Friendship that Sparked Alice’s Adventures.” Lewis Carroll:
Interviews and Recollections. Ed. Morton N. Cohen. London: Macmillan, 1989.
83-8.
Hearn, Michael Patrick. “Introduction.” The Victorian Fairy Tale Book. Ed. Michael
Patrick Hearn. New York: Pantheon, 1988. xv-xxvii.
Hollingsworth, Christopher. “Introduction.” Alice Beyond Wonderland. Ed.
Christopher Hollingsworth. Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 2009. xvii-xxviii.
Islam, Syed Manzurul. “Making boundaries/crossing lines.” The Ethics of Travel: From Marco Polo to Kafka. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1996. 2-77.
Kelly, Richard. Lewis Carroll: Revised Edition. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1990.
Kincaid, James R. “Alice’s Invasion of Wonderland.” PMLA 88.1 (1973): 92-99.
Lefebvre, Henri. The Production of Space. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford:
Blackwell, 1991.
Madden, William A. “Framing the Alices.” PMLA 101.3 (1986): 362-373.
Manlove, Colin. From Alice to Harry Potter: Children’s Fantasy in England.
Christchurch: Cybereditions, 2003.
Massumi, Brian. “Notes on the Translation and Acknowledgements.” In Gilles
Deleuze and Felix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota
P, 1987. xvi-xix
May, Louise W. “Anne and Alice.” The Feminist Reconstruction of Space. Ed. Louise
W. May. St. Norbert Arts and Cultural Centre, 2000. 35-47.
Meier, Franz. “Photographic Wonderland: Intermediality and Identity in Lewis
Carroll’s Alice Books.” Alice Beyond Wonderland. Ed. Christopher Hollingsworth. Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 2009. 117-33.
Michie, Helena. The Flesh Made Word: Female Figures and Women’s Bodies. New
York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
Morton, Lionel. “Memory in the Alice Books.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 33.3
(1987): 285-308.
Peterson, Alan. The Body in Question: A Socio-Cultural Approach. New York:
Routledge, 2007.
Rackin, Donald. “Through the Looking-Glass: Alice Becomes an I.” Children’s
Literature Review. Ed. Tom Burns. Vol. 108. Detroit: Gale, 2005. 61-72.
---. “Mind over Matter: Sexuality and Where the ‘body happens to be’ in the Alice
Books.” Textual Bodies: Changing Boundaries of Literary Representation. Ed. Lori Hope Lefkovitz. New York: State U of New York P, 1997. 161-83.
Roth, Christine. “Looking through the Spyglass: Lewis Carroll, James Barrie, and the
Empire of Childhood.” Alice Beyond Wonderland. Ed. Christopher Hollingsworth. Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 2009. 23-35.
Shildrick, Margrit. “This Body which is Not One: Dealing with Differences.” Body
Modification. Ed. Mike Featherstone. London: Sage, 2000. 77-92.
Silver, Anna Krugovoy. Victorian Literature and the Anorexic Body. New York:
Cambridge UP, 2002.
Soja, Edward W. Thirdspace. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
Szakolczai, Arpad. “Liminality and Experience: Structuring transitory situations and
transformative events.” International Political Anthropology 2.1 (2009): 141-172.
---. “Modernity as Permanent Liminality.” Reflexive Historical Sociology. New York:
Routledge, 2000. 215- 226.
Taylor, Roger. “All in the Golden Afternoon: The Photographs of Charles Lutwidge
Dodgson.” Lewis Carroll: Photographer. Roger Taylor and Edward Wakeling.
Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002. 1-120.
Thomassen, Bjørn. “The Uses and Meanings of Liminality.” International Political
Anthropology 2.1 (2009): 5-27.
Tuan, Yi-Fu. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press.
Turner, Victor. “Betwixt and Between: The Liminal Period in Rites de Passage.” The
Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. New York: Cornell UP, 1967. 93-111.
---. “Liminality and Communitas.” The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure.
Chicago: Aldine, 1969. 94-130.
---. “Mukanda: Rite of Circumcision.” The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu
Ritual. New York: Cornell UP, 1967. 151-279.
Van Gennep, Arnold. The Rites of Passage. Trans. Monika B. Vizedom and Gabrielle
L. Caffee. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1960.
Zipes, Jack. When Dreams Came True: Classical Fairy Tales and Their Tradition.
New York: Routledge, 2007.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學研究所
96551002
100
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096551002
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 何艾克zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Heroux, Ericken_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 陳凱琳zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Chen, Kai Linen_US
dc.creator (作者) 陳凱琳zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Kai Linen_US
dc.date (日期) 2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned 12-四月-2012 13:47:09 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 12-四月-2012 13:47:09 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 12-四月-2012 13:47:09 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0096551002en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52501-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英國語文學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96551002zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 100zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 路易士‧卡洛爾的《愛麗絲夢遊記》(Alice in Wonderland, 1865) 及《穿越明鏡》(Through the Looking-Glass, 1871) 是十九世紀極為出名的兒童文學。兩本書中都描述一位名為愛麗絲的女孩如何進入一個奇幻的國度而展開旅程，以及當中她所遇見的各種角色。這兩本書不只豐富有趣，更充滿了諧擬以及邏輯和文字遊戲，使其成為現今許多學者研究的對象。但是，兩本書的相似性使得一般讀者或是學者在閱讀時，都將其視為同一則故事。然而，在仔細探索後，會發現卡洛爾在寫作過程中，很明顯地把兩本書做了區分。本論文因此試圖將兩本書進行比較分析，來重新檢視兩個奇幻世界以及兩個愛麗絲的差異性。
      本文第一章為概論，簡單介紹卡洛爾及其兩本作品。第二章運用德勒茲和加達利的概念，針對仙境與鏡中世界的空間的進行比較。從文本例證中可看出，第一本書中的仙境近似一個「平滑空間」(smooth space)，而第二本中的鏡中世界則如同一個「褶縐空間」(striated space)。此差異性更凸顯了這兩段故事的不同。第三章主要應用透納的理論來探討主角愛麗絲與兩個空間的關係。透納利用范‧杰內普的「儀式理論」(rites of passage)發展出「閾限」(liminality)的觀念，並用此觀念來解讀正在進行生命儀式的個體以及其所屬的階段。許多學者認為兩段故事是在描述愛麗絲長大的過程，因此她的旅程可被視為她經歷生命儀式─成年禮的歷程。然而，雖然兩本書中的兩個空間均可被視為一種「閾限空間」(liminal space)，但只有鏡中世界塑造了一個成功的生命儀式，使愛麗絲在最後得以達到象徵性的成年。另一方面，由於仙境中缺乏線性進展，無法構成一個有效的生命儀式，導致第一本書中的愛麗絲到最後還是以小孩之姿結束在此空間的旅程。第四章援引兩位學者的文章來探討愛麗絲在兩個空間中身體呈現的差異以及和愛麗絲自我發展的相關性。由於愛麗絲在仙境中維持一個小孩的身分，她的身體與行為不會造成社會的威脅，在空間中也就不會受任何拘束。反之，在愛麗絲即將長大的鏡中世界中，其女性的身體卻必須受到限制。因此，在鏡中世界的愛麗絲不僅身體未出現任何變化，她的任何身體的慾望也必須受到克制。這與在第一本書中的身體再現是全然迥異的。第五章則是本文的結論；總結這兩本書的差異性，而身為讀者的我們也應正視其中的區別，進而能夠更加了解卡洛爾筆下的兩個奇幻世界以及兩位均名為愛麗絲的主角。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass have brought laughter to children as they journey with Alice through the fantasy worlds ever since their first publication in the 19th century. Filled with Carroll’s witty parodies and plays of logic, the books quickly become two of the most widely studied children fantasies. Both books are about a little girl named Alice who crosses a barrier and enters a fantastical dream world, in which she meets a variety of strange creatures. With the similarity of structures, the two books are often regarded as one single work in modern days. However, upon close examination, it is quite evident that the two works are of entirely different entities, and should be read accordingly. In my thesis, I explore the possibility of reading the books separately by comparing and contrasting Carroll’s creation of the two worlds, as well as the two different developments of Alice within the books.
      In chapter one, I give an overall summary of the author and a brief introduction of the background of the Alices. Chapter two focuses on the two spaces of Wonderland and Looking-Glass World. Using Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s notion of smooth and striated space, this chapter delineates how Wonderland is more like a smooth space with its rhizomatic routes and a lack of center, whereas the linearity of Looking-Glass World appears to be closer to a striated space. This critical difference highlights the individualization between the two worlds.
      Chapter three investigates the relationship between Alice and the two spaces by adopting Victor Turner’s concept. Drawing on Arnold van Gennep’s notion of the rites of passage, Turner proposes the concept of liminality, which is the state of an individual when he or she is undergoing a rite of passage. Most scholars suggest that both Alice books depict Alice’s development to adulthood, which makes Alice’s journeys through the two worlds rites of passage. However, while both spaces can be said to be liminal spaces for Alice, only Looking-Glass World constitutes a completed rite of passage for her, in which she reaches a symbolic maturity at the end. With no linear progression, Wonderland fails to be a rite of passage, and hence Alice comes out still as the child she is going in.
      Chapter four concentrates on the bodily manifestation of Alice, and how they relate to the difference in Alice’s self development in the two books. Drawing on Donald Rackin’s and Anna Krugovoy Silver’s articles, I find that Alice’s exuberant bodily manifestation and vigorous expression of bodily desires in Wonderland is due to the fact that Alice remains a young child, and that her immature body does not cause a threat to the Victorian society. Hence, Carroll allows her to be the fully embodied girl in the first book. In Looking-Glass World, in which Alice is on the verge of growing up, her body must be restrained. Thus, her body stays static and her bodily desires are contained, very different from the bodily representation in the first book.
      In Wonderland and Looking-Glass, Carroll has created two very enchanting stories, with two distinctive fantasy worlds and two separate developments of Alice. Conclusively, I believe that Carroll meant for them to be treated as two separate books, with two different spaces of the dream worlds and two protagonists by the name of Alice.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Acknowledgment...........................................iii
     
     Chinese Abstract.........................................v
     
     English Abstract........................................vii
     
     Chapter One Introduction...............................1
     
     Chapter Two Two Different Spaces of Wonderland and
     Looking-Glass World......................................17
     
     Chapter Three Liminaliy and Rites of Passage in the Two Alices...................................................45
     
     Chapter Four The Two Bodily Manifestations of Alice....83
     
     Chapter Five Conclusion...............................107
     Works Cited.............................................111		zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096551002en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 路易士‧卡洛爾zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 平滑空間zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 褶縐空間zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 閾限zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 儀式理論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 身體再現zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Lewis Carrollen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) smooth spaceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) striated spaceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) liminalityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) rites of passageen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) bodily representationen_US
dc.title (題名) 重塑愛麗絲：愛麗絲在仙境與鏡中世界的自我及空間經驗zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Refiguring the two Alices: Alice’s Spatial Experiences and self in wonderland and looking-glassen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Auerbach, Nina. “Alice in Wonderland: A Curious Child.” Modern Critical Reviews:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lewis Carroll. Ed. and Introd. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House, 1987. 31-44.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baum, Alwin L. “Carroll’s Alices: The Semiotics of Paradox.” Modern Criticalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reviews: Lewis Carroll. Ed. and Introd. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House, 1987. 65-81.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Babcock, Babara A. “Mud, Mirror, and Making up: Liminality and Reflexivity inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Between the Acts.” Victor Turner and the Construction of Cultural Criticism. Ed. Kathleen M. Ashley. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990. 86-116.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bivona, Daniel. “Alice the Child-Imperialist and the Games of Wonderland.”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nineteenth-Century Fiction 41.2 (1986): 143-171.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bogue, Ronald. Deleuze’s Way: Essays in Transverse Ethics and Aesthetics. Vermont:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ashgate Publishing, 2007.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bordo, Susan. “The Reproduction of Femininity.” Female Embodiment and Feministzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Theory. Ed. Katie Conboy et al. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997. 90-110.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Richard Nice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bunnell, Peter C. “Introduction.” Lewis Carroll: Photographer. Roger Taylor andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Edward Wakeling. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) vii-xv.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carroll, Lewis. Alice’s Adventure in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass. Illus. John Tenniel. Introd. and Notes. Roger Lancelyn Green. New York: Oxford UP, 1982.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ---. “Alice on the Stage.” Alice in Wonderland: A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. Donald J. Gray. New York: Norton, 1992. 280-282.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cixous, Helene and Marie Maclean. “Introduction to Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass and The Hunting of the Snark.” New Literary History 13.2 (1982): 231-251.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cohen, Morton N., ed. The Selected Letters of Lewis Carroll. London: Macmillan, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Coveney, Peter. “Escape.” Alice in Wonderland: A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. Donald J. Gray. New York: Norton, 1992. 327-334.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cresswell, Tim. Place: A Short Introduction. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Deleuze, Gilles. The Logic of Sense. Tr. Mark Lester. London: Continuum, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Douglas, Mary. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) New York: Routledge, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Drawmer, Lois. “The Dysmorphic Bodies of Alice in Wonderland.” Monsters and thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Monstrous: Myths and Metaphors of Enduring Evil. Vol. 4. Ed. Paul L. Yoder and Peter Mario Kreuter. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press, 2004. 273-284.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Empson, William. “The Child as Swain.” Alice in Wonderland: A Norton Criticalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Edition. Ed. Donald J. Gray. New York: Norton, 1992. 344-357.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Foucault, Michel. “Of Other Spaces.” Trans. Jay Miskowiec. Diacritics 16.1 (1986):zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gardner, Martin. The Annotated Alice: The Definitive Edition. New York: Norton,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gordon, Jan B. “The Alice Books and the Metaphors of Victorian Childhood.”Modernzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Critical Reviews: Lewis Carroll. Ed. and Introd. Harold Bloom. New York:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chelsea House, 1987. 17-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gutting, Gary. French Philosophy in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge UP, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hargreaves, Alice. “The Friendship that Sparked Alice’s Adventures.” Lewis Carroll:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Interviews and Recollections. Ed. Morton N. Cohen. London: Macmillan, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 83-8.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hearn, Michael Patrick. “Introduction.” The Victorian Fairy Tale Book. Ed. Michaelzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Patrick Hearn. New York: Pantheon, 1988. xv-xxvii.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hollingsworth, Christopher. “Introduction.” Alice Beyond Wonderland. Ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Christopher Hollingsworth. Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 2009. xvii-xxviii.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Islam, Syed Manzurul. “Making boundaries/crossing lines.” The Ethics of Travel: From Marco Polo to Kafka. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1996. 2-77.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kelly, Richard. Lewis Carroll: Revised Edition. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kincaid, James R. “Alice’s Invasion of Wonderland.” PMLA 88.1 (1973): 92-99.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lefebvre, Henri. The Production of Space. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Blackwell, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Madden, William A. “Framing the Alices.” PMLA 101.3 (1986): 362-373.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Manlove, Colin. From Alice to Harry Potter: Children’s Fantasy in England.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Christchurch: Cybereditions, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Massumi, Brian. “Notes on the Translation and Acknowledgements.” In Gilleszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Deleuze and Felix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis: U of Minnesotazh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) P, 1987. xvi-xixzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) May, Louise W. “Anne and Alice.” The Feminist Reconstruction of Space. Ed. Louisezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) W. May. St. Norbert Arts and Cultural Centre, 2000. 35-47.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Meier, Franz. “Photographic Wonderland: Intermediality and Identity in Lewiszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carroll’s Alice Books.” Alice Beyond Wonderland. Ed. Christopher Hollingsworth. Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 2009. 117-33.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Michie, Helena. The Flesh Made Word: Female Figures and Women’s Bodies. Newzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) York: Oxford University Press, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Morton, Lionel. “Memory in the Alice Books.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 33.3zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (1987): 285-308.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peterson, Alan. The Body in Question: A Socio-Cultural Approach. New York:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Routledge, 2007.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rackin, Donald. “Through the Looking-Glass: Alice Becomes an I.” Children’szh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Literature Review. Ed. Tom Burns. Vol. 108. Detroit: Gale, 2005. 61-72.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ---. “Mind over Matter: Sexuality and Where the ‘body happens to be’ in the Alicezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Books.” Textual Bodies: Changing Boundaries of Literary Representation. Ed. Lori Hope Lefkovitz. New York: State U of New York P, 1997. 161-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Roth, Christine. “Looking through the Spyglass: Lewis Carroll, James Barrie, and thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Empire of Childhood.” Alice Beyond Wonderland. Ed. Christopher Hollingsworth. Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 2009. 23-35.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shildrick, Margrit. “This Body which is Not One: Dealing with Differences.” Bodyzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Modification. Ed. Mike Featherstone. London: Sage, 2000. 77-92.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Silver, Anna Krugovoy. Victorian Literature and the Anorexic Body. New York:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cambridge UP, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Soja, Edward W. Thirdspace. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Szakolczai, Arpad. “Liminality and Experience: Structuring transitory situations andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) transformative events.” International Political Anthropology 2.1 (2009): 141-172.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ---. “Modernity as Permanent Liminality.” Reflexive Historical Sociology. New York:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Routledge, 2000. 215- 226.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Taylor, Roger. “All in the Golden Afternoon: The Photographs of Charles Lutwidgezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dodgson.” Lewis Carroll: Photographer. Roger Taylor and Edward Wakeling.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002. 1-120.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thomassen, Bjørn. “The Uses and Meanings of Liminality.” International Politicalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anthropology 2.1 (2009): 5-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tuan, Yi-Fu. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) University of Minnesota Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Turner, Victor. “Betwixt and Between: The Liminal Period in Rites de Passage.” Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. New York: Cornell UP, 1967. 93-111.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ---. “Liminality and Communitas.” The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chicago: Aldine, 1969. 94-130.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ---. “Mukanda: Rite of Circumcision.” The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembuzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ritual. New York: Cornell UP, 1967. 151-279.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Van Gennep, Arnold. The Rites of Passage. Trans. Monika B. Vizedom and Gabriellezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) L. Caffee. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1960.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zipes, Jack. When Dreams Came True: Classical Fairy Tales and Their Tradition.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) New York: Routledge, 2007.zh_TW