Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 鄉民全都「讚」出來:初探反國光石化運動的青年網路實踐
Everybody "Like": Exploring internet practices in youth in Anti Guo-Kuang Petroleum Plant social movement
作者 盧沛樺
貢獻者 方念萱<br>Fang, Leticia
盧沛樺
關鍵詞 網路社運
科技與社會
數位原民
媒體素養
參與文化
腳本
cyber activism
Society, Technology, and Science
digital native
media literacy
participatory culture
script
日期 2011
上傳時間 17-Apr-2012 09:08:49 (UTC+8)
摘要 評估探究網路社運的研究結果紛雜,與其說結果歧出,不如重新檢視用以分析的路徑。我認為著眼於技術形式的分析路徑可能有所不足,因此,本研究切換視角,自科技與社會研究中汲取養分,從使用中科技(technology in-use)的角度切入,藉機勾勒數位科技在善於把玩者手中所形成的各色風貌,及其打造有別於傳統社運的抗爭戲碼。文中便整理多樣數位科技在社會運動中快或慢地跳脫原先功能與使用方式的情形,突顯全青盟成員是以長期的網路使用經驗為基礎,才能深具創意地將特定科技依運動階段轉換角色,或是有技巧地應運動階段帶進不同的科技,並在多元的科技間加以協調、組合,或是勝任翻譯者的角色,在運動的聲援者與網路使用者之間快速轉換,將嚴肅的運動資訊應數位平台的特色與文化裁剪為引人共鳴的文本。簡言之,用於加強社交的強勢腳本已在愛用且善用的使用者手中退位,數位科技重新以社會運動科技的姿態登場。事實上,這正反映網路世代對社會運動的想像與行動已難排除長期耽溺的網路經驗,於是,無論是社會對話、群眾串聯、組織形式均深受數位參與文化的潛移默化,開創有別於傳統的社運圖像。
The findings of cyber activism research that focus on technical forms are diverse and confusing. Thus, I believe it is better to reexamine the way of analysis. The article uses the perspective of technology in-use which draws from Society, Technology, and Science (STS) approach to trace the dynamic of young activists using digital technologies in social movement, as well as the characteristics of contemporary internet-embedded social movements beyond traditional ones. The study shows that digital technologies have departed from original scripts in different degrees. Based on the long-term experiences of using internet, members of National Youth Alliance Against KuoKuang Petrochemical Project creatively changed roles of technologies and tactically composed multiple technologies according to the stages of movement. Moreover, they successfully reedited the campaigns which widely disseminated in digital environment based on their capacity for switching identities between activists and internet users. In short, digital technologies were originally used to strengthen human relations. The skilled users/activists of digital technologies have, however, utilized these technologies to promote social movements. In fact, as mentioned above, it also reveals that the imagination and actions of social movements by net generation cannot exclude their long-term experiences of internet use. Therefore, regardless of social dialogue, mobilization and organization structure which are critical elements of social movement, they all have been deeply influenced by digital participatory culture.
參考文獻 中文文獻
方俊育、李尚仁譯(2004)。〈從創新到使用:十道兼容並蓄的技術史史學題綱〉,《科技渴望性別》,台北:群學。(原文:Edgerton, D.. [1998]. From innovation to use: Ten eclectic theses on the historiography of technology. In R. Guesnerie, & F. Hartog (Eds), Des science et des techniques: un debat. (pp.259-288). Paris: Armand Colin.)
王惟芬、黃柏恒、楊雅婷譯(2011)。《一位數位移民的告白》。台北市:行人文化實驗室。(原書:Bilton, N.. [2010]. I live in the future and here’s how it works: Why your world, work, and brain are being creatively disrupted. NY: Crown Business.)
吳國卿譯(2011)。《下班時間扭轉未來:休閒時間x網路連結=改變世界的決勝點》。台北:行人文化實驗室。(原書:Shirky, C.. [2010]. Cognitive surplus: Creativity and generosity in a connected age. NY: The Penguin Group.)
李明炫(2008)。《Web2.0下的社會運動:以樂生保留運動為例》。世新大學新聞學研究所碩士論文。
何明修(2011)。〈導論:探索台灣的運動社會〉,何明修、林秀幸(編),《社會運動的年代:晚近二十年來的台灣行動主義》,頁1-32。台北:群學。
林國明、陳東升(2005)。〈審義民主、科技決策與公共討論〉,《科技、醫療與社會》,3: 1-50。
林鶴玲、鄭陸霖(2001)。〈臺灣社會運動網路經驗初探:一個探索性的分析〉,《臺灣社會學刊》,25: 1-39。
邱佳心、張玉佩(2009)。〈想像與創作:同人誌的情慾文化探索〉,《資訊傳播學報》,6: 141-172。
洪千晴(2010)。《正文以外─新聞記者的部落格書寫與社會運動:以野草莓學運為例》。世新大學資訊傳播學研究所碩士論文。
胡昌智譯(2011)。《維基解密─從地下駭客到挑戰世界強權的超級媒體》。台北:時報文化。(原書:Rosenbach, M., & Stark, H.. [2011]. Staatsfeind WikiLeaks. Germany: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.)
苗延威譯(2002)。《社會運動概論》,台北:巨流。(原書:della Porta, D., & Diani, M.. [1997]. Social movements: An introduction. Italy: La Nuova Italia.)
徐詩思譯(2003)。《No Logo》。台北:時報。(原書:Klein, N. [2002]. No logo: Taking aim at the brand bullies. NY: St. Martins Press.)
翁文靜(1990年5月28日)。〈小蜜蜂到處塗鴉,大學生打破神話──學運中的「噴漆文化」〉,《新新聞周刊》,168: 58-65。
翁書偉(2010年5月)。〈替代能源系統的榮耀與哀愁─從瓦斯車在臺灣的困境談科技的政治鑲嵌〉,「2010年臺灣科技與社會學會第二屆年會」,高雄市楠梓區。
張玉佩、葉孟儒(2008)。〈美貌的詛咒:男性凝視在網路相簿的權力探索〉,《資訊社會研究》,15: 249-274。
莊豐嘉(2011)。《台灣公民新聞崛起對公共政策之衝擊──從樂生、大埔到反國光石化事件之比較分析》。國立台灣大學政治學研究所在職專班碩士論文。
陳湘嵐(2004)。〈網際網路、替代性媒介與社會運動:以南方電子報為例〉。國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。
程雅欣譯(2004)。〈民主、專業知識、和愛滋療法社會運動〉,《科技渴望性別》,台北:群學。(原文:Epstein, S.. [2000]. Democracy, expertise, and AIDS treatment activism. In D. L.Kleinman (Ed), Science, technology, and democracy. (pp.15-32). NY: State University of New York Press, Albany.)
黃以敬(2011年2月28日)。〈中國防開茉莉花 成本逼近國防預算〉,《自由時報》,A4。
黃金正(2008)。《從網路Kuso的言談情境論網路的政治參與》。南華大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
黃厚銘(2000)。〈網路人際關係的親疏遠近〉,《國立臺灣大學社會學刊》,28: 117-154。
黃哲斌(2009)。《公民新聞的網路實踐─以樂生療養院事件為例》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
楊國斌(2009)。〈悲情與戲謔:網絡事件中的情感動員〉,《傳播與社會學刊》,9: 39-66。
管中祥(2010年8月12日)。【另類媒體與社會運動】。未出版之演講資料。
趙惠淨(2009)。〈網路、年輕人與臨時自治區〉,《新聞學研究》,101: 245-278。
劉世鼎、勞麗珠(2010)。〈網路作為澳門的另類公共領域〉,《新聞學研究》,102: 253-293.
蔡炯青(2009)。《網際網路在民主政治的溝通過程研究─以野草莓學運為例》。世新大學傳播研究所博士論文。
蔡培慧(2010)。〈真實是一場社會行動:反思台灣農村陣線的行動與組織〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,79: 319-339。
鄭君良(2003)。《非營利網站之經營策略研究:以「南方電子報」、「苦勞網」與「網氏/罔市女性電子報」為例》。南華大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
鄭陸霖、林鶴玲(2001)。〈社運在網際網路上的展現:台灣社會運動網站的聯網分析〉,《台灣社會學》,2: 55-96。
盧沛樺(2010年7月)。〈網路動員與青年公民參與:以PTT鄉民救災團為例〉,「2010年中華傳播學會暨第四屆數位國際學術研討會」,嘉義民雄。
謝合勝(2010)。《線上共識動員研究─以2008年野草莓學生運動為例》。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。
龐惠潔(2005)。《美麗人生:網路相簿社群的互動行為研究》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
蘇文淑譯(2011)。《架構的生態系─資訊環境被如何設計至今?》。台北:大鴻藝術。(原書:Hamano, S.. [2008]. アーキテクチャの生態系 情報環境はいかに設計されてきたか Tokyo: NTT Publishing.)
西文文獻
Aelst, P. V., & Walgrave S. (2006). New media, new movement? The role of the internet in shaping the ‘anti-globalization’ movement. In W. van de Donk, B. D. Loader, P. G. Nixon, D. Rucht (Eds.), Cyberprotest (pp.97-122). London: Routledge.
Akrich, M.. (1994). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker, & J. Law (eds.) Shaping technology/ building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, (pp. 205-224). Cambridge, MIT Press.
Benkler, Y.. (2004). Sharing nicely: On shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production. The Yale law journal, 114(2):273-358.
Bennett, W. L., Breunig, C., & Givens, T.. (2008). Communication and political mobilization: Digital media and the organization of Anti-Iraq war demonstration in the U.S.. Political communication, 25: 269-289.
Bennett, W. L.. (2006). Communication global activism: Strengths and vulnerabilities of networked politics. In W. van de Donk, B. D. Loader, P. G. Nixon, D. Rucht (Eds.), Cyberprotest (pp.123-146). London: Routledge.
Bennett, W. L.. (2008). Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age. In W., Lance Bennett (Ed), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth(pp.1-24). NY: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Berker,T., Hartmann, M., Punie, Y., & Ward, K.. (2006). Introduction. In T. Berker, M. Hartmann, Y. Punie, & K. Ward. (eds.) Domestication of media and technology, (pp.1-17). England: Open University Press.
Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C.. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication theory, 15(4): 365-388.
Bimber, B.. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. Washington, DC: Capitol Advantage.
Bollier, D.. (2005). Brand name bullies. US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
boyd, d., and Ellison, N., B.. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-mediated communication, 13(1): 210-230.
boyd, d.. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham, Youth, identity, and digital media (pp.112-135). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Callon, M..(1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.) Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-233). London: Routledge.
Carrington, V.. (2009). Digital culture, play, creativity: Trapped underground.jpg. In R. Willett, M, Robinson, & J. Marsh (eds.) Play, creativity, and digital cultures, (pp.143-199). NY: Routledge.
Castells, M.. (1996). The rise of the network society. US: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
Castells, M.. (2004). The power of identity. US: Wiley.
Chadwick, A. (2007). Digital network repertoires and organizational hybridity. Political communication, 24: 283-301.
Cowan, R. S. (1985). How the refrigerator got its hum. In D. Mackenzie & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The social shaping of technology (pp.202-218). England: Open University Press.
Dahlberg, L.. (2001). The internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, communication & society, 4(4): 615-633.
Davis, A.. (2009). New media and fat democracy: the paradox of online participation. New media & society, 11(8): 1-20.
DiMaggio P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., and Robinson, J. P.. (2001). Social implications of the internet. Annual review, 27: 307-336.
Elin, L..(2003). The radicalization of Zeke Spier: How the Internet contributes to civic engagement and new forms of social capital. In M. McCaughey, & M. D. Ayers (eds.) Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (pp.97-116). NY: Routledge.
Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R.. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. Oxford: Routledge.
Gaines, B. J., and Mondak, J. J.. (2009). Typing together? Clustering of ideological types in online social networks. Journal of information technology & politics, 6: 216-231.
Ganesh, S., & Stohl, C.. (2010). Qualifying engagement: A study of information and communication technology and the global social justice movement in Aotearoa New Zealand. Communication monographs, 77(1): 51-74.
Garrett, R. K.. (2006). Protest in and information society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, communication & society, 9(2): 202-224.
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Puig-I-Abrul, E., & Rojas, H.. (2009). Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: An assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment. New media & society, 11(4): 553-574.
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Veenstra, A., Vraga, E., & Shah, D.. (2010). Digital democracy: Reimagining pathways to political participation. Journal of information technology & politics, (7)1: 36-51.
Hanemaayer, A..(2009). A grounded theory approach to engaging technology on the paintball field. In P. Vannini (ed.) Material culture and technology in everyday life, (pp.157-168). NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
Howley, K. (2005). Community media: People, places, and communication technologies. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Jenkins, H.. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. NY: New York University Press.
Jenkins, H.. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. London: The MIT Press.
Johnson, T. J., Kaye, B.K., Bichard, S. L., & Wong, W. J.. (2008). Every blog has its day: Politically-interested internet users’ perceptions of blog credibility. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 13(1): 100-122.
Jordan, T., & Taylor, P. A.. (2004). Hacktivism and cyberwars: Rebels with a cause? US: Routledge.
Keenan, A., & Shiri, A.. (2009). Sociability and social interaction on social networking websites. Library review, 58(6): 438-450.
Kim, K. H., and Yun, H.. (2008). Cying for me, cying for us: Relational dialectics in a Korean social network site. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 13(1): 298-318.
Kling, R.. (1996). Social relationships in electronic forum: Hangouts, salons, workplaces, and communities. In R. Kling (ed.) Computerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices (pp. 426-454). US: Academic Press.
Mackey, M.. (2009). Exciting yet safe: The appeal of thick play and big worlds. In R. Willett, M, Robinson, & J. Marsh (eds.) Play, creativity, and digital cultures, (pp.92-107). NY: Routledge.
Melucci, A.. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Merrill, B.. (2009). Making it, not making it: Creating music in everyday life. In P. Vannini (ed.) Material culture and technology in everyday life, (pp.193-209). NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
Peretti, J. & Mcheletti, M. (2004). The Nike sweatshop emails: Political consumerism, Internet, and culture jamming. In M. Micheletti, A. Follesdal, & D. Stolle (eds.) Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present (pp. 127-144). US: Transaction Publishers.
Pinch, T..(2009). The social construction of technology (SCOT): The old, the new, and the nonhuman. In P. Vannini (ed.) Material culture and technology in everyday life, (pp.45-58). NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
Prensky, M.. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon, 9(5): 1-6。
Rheingold, H.. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. US: Perseus Books Group.
Scheufele, D., & Nisbet, M.. (2002). Being a citizen online: New opportunities and dead ends. Harvard international journal of press/ politics, 7(3): 55-75.
Sørensen, K., H. (2006). Domestication: the enactment of technology. In T. Berker, M. Hartmann, Y. Punie, & K. Ward. (eds.) Domestication of media and technology, (pp.40-61). England: Open University Press.
Sustein, C.R.. (2002). Republic. com. USA: Princeton University Press.
van Laer, J., & van Aelst, P..(2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires: Opportunities and limitations. Information, communication & society, 13(8): 1146-1171.
Wajcman, J. (2002). Addressing technological change: The challenge to social theory. Current sociology, 50(3): 347-363.
Wallsten, K.. (2008). Political blogs: Transmission belts, soapboxs, mobilizers, or conversation starters? Journal of information technology & politics, 4(3): 19-40.
Walton, D. C.. (2008). Is modern information technology enabling the evolution of a more direct democracy? World futures, 63: 365-385.
Willett, R., & Robinson, M.. (2009). Introduction: Encountering play and creativity in everyday life. In R. Willett, M, Robinson, & J. Marsh (eds.) Play, creativity, and digital cultures, (pp.1-10). NY: Routledge.
William, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, 25, 865-899.
Xenos, M.. (2008). New mediated deliberation: Blogs and press coverage of the Alito nomination. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 13(2): 485-503.
線上資料
何明修(2006年6月3日)。〈社會運動研究的社會學想像〉,《群學出版論壇》。上網日期:2010年10月26日,取自http://socio.com.tw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=146
李雪莉(2012年1月13日)。〈340萬台灣青年 撼動總統大選〉,《陽光時務台灣總統大選特刊》。上網日期:2012年1月19日,取自http://www.isunaffairs.com/?p=2398
豆腐魚聽自言自語(2011年1月30日)。〈「國光石化撤案‧守護青年未來」行動有感〉。上網日期:2011年2月25日,取自http://blog.roodo.com/skydaughter
張鐵志(2011年3月27日)。〈時代正在改變:台灣的八零後社運青年〉,《Sounds and Fury》。上網日期,2011年3月30日。取自http://blog.roodo.com/SoundsandFury/archives/15442987.html
陳信行譯(2008年12月25日)。〈無架構的暴政(THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS)〉,《文化研究月報》,第87期。上網日期:2010年10月15日,取自http://csat.org.tw/journal/Content.asp?Period=87&JC_ID=88
陳順孝(2008年12月8日)。〈野草莓運動的傳播分析(草稿)〉,《阿孝札記》。上網日期:2010年1月10日,取自http://www.ashaw.org/2008/12/post.html
劉美妤(2011年4月29日)。〈青年新遊戲對抗國家舊機器─反國光石化的文化行動〉,《破報》。上網日期:2011年6月18日,取自http://www.pots.com.tw/node/8052
劉致昕(2011年10月17日)。〈全球上千個城市跟進 青年火藥庫引爆〉,《商業周刊》,第1247期。上網日期:2011年10月31日,取自http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/webarticle.php?id=44764
賴珍琳(2008年6月25日)。〈掌握未來二十年得主流市場:解構台灣最大網路社群批踢踢(PTT)〉,《今周刊》,第601期。上網日期:2011年11月20日,取自http://www.businesstoday.com.tw/v1/content.aspx?a=W20080600180&p=2
謝昇佑(2011年6月2日)。〈沒有太多喜悅的勝仗:反國光石化運動的成與敗〉,《青平台電子報No.7》。上網日期:2012年1月20日,取自http://epaper.ystaiwan.org.tw/no7/
Ball, J.. (8 November 2011). Two-thirds support social networking blackout in future riots. The Guardian. Retrieved November 24, 2011, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/nov/08/two-thirds-support-social-media-blackout
Gladwell, M.. (4 October 2010). Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker. Retrieved December 25, 2010, from http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/04/101004fa_fact_gladwell
Ito, M.. (2009). Media literacy and social action in a Post-Pokemon world. A rough transcript of a keynote address for the 51st NFAIS annual conference. Retrieved October 8, 2011, from http://www.itofisher.com/mito/publications/media_literacy.html
Jenkins, H.. (2006, October 20). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century (Part one). Retrieved November 16, 2009, from http://www.henryjenkins.org/2006/10/confronting_the_challenges_of.html
Smith, B., Costello, T., & Brecher, J.. (2009, February. 2). Social movements 2.0. The Nation. Retrieved October 13, 2009, from http://www.thenation.com/article/social-movements-20
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
新聞研究所
98451002
100
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0984510021
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 方念萱<br>Fang, Leticiazh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 盧沛樺zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 盧沛樺zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-Apr-2012 09:08:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Apr-2012 09:08:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Apr-2012 09:08:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0984510021en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52714-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 新聞研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98451002zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 100zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 評估探究網路社運的研究結果紛雜,與其說結果歧出,不如重新檢視用以分析的路徑。我認為著眼於技術形式的分析路徑可能有所不足,因此,本研究切換視角,自科技與社會研究中汲取養分,從使用中科技(technology in-use)的角度切入,藉機勾勒數位科技在善於把玩者手中所形成的各色風貌,及其打造有別於傳統社運的抗爭戲碼。文中便整理多樣數位科技在社會運動中快或慢地跳脫原先功能與使用方式的情形,突顯全青盟成員是以長期的網路使用經驗為基礎,才能深具創意地將特定科技依運動階段轉換角色,或是有技巧地應運動階段帶進不同的科技,並在多元的科技間加以協調、組合,或是勝任翻譯者的角色,在運動的聲援者與網路使用者之間快速轉換,將嚴肅的運動資訊應數位平台的特色與文化裁剪為引人共鳴的文本。簡言之,用於加強社交的強勢腳本已在愛用且善用的使用者手中退位,數位科技重新以社會運動科技的姿態登場。事實上,這正反映網路世代對社會運動的想像與行動已難排除長期耽溺的網路經驗,於是,無論是社會對話、群眾串聯、組織形式均深受數位參與文化的潛移默化,開創有別於傳統的社運圖像。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The findings of cyber activism research that focus on technical forms are diverse and confusing. Thus, I believe it is better to reexamine the way of analysis. The article uses the perspective of technology in-use which draws from Society, Technology, and Science (STS) approach to trace the dynamic of young activists using digital technologies in social movement, as well as the characteristics of contemporary internet-embedded social movements beyond traditional ones. The study shows that digital technologies have departed from original scripts in different degrees. Based on the long-term experiences of using internet, members of National Youth Alliance Against KuoKuang Petrochemical Project creatively changed roles of technologies and tactically composed multiple technologies according to the stages of movement. Moreover, they successfully reedited the campaigns which widely disseminated in digital environment based on their capacity for switching identities between activists and internet users. In short, digital technologies were originally used to strengthen human relations. The skilled users/activists of digital technologies have, however, utilized these technologies to promote social movements. In fact, as mentioned above, it also reveals that the imagination and actions of social movements by net generation cannot exclude their long-term experiences of internet use. Therefore, regardless of social dialogue, mobilization and organization structure which are critical elements of social movement, they all have been deeply influenced by digital participatory culture.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第壹章、 緒論 1
第一節、 反國光石化運動,讚(like) 1
第二節、 研究視角與研究貢獻 6
第貳章、 文獻回顧 9
第一節、 技術本位的科技─社會運動研究 9
1-1、科技烏托邦的觀點 10
1-2、科技反烏托邦的觀點 14
第二節、 使用中的科技 16
2-1、駁斥科技決定論 16
2-2、科技分析應從科技祈使轉移到科技使用 17
第三節、 數位原民與新素養 21
3-1、蔓生的數位參與文化:分享、合作 22
3-2、數位公民及其政治實踐 25
第參章、 研究方法 29
第一節、 研究問題與個案代表性 29
第二節、 研究設計 31
2-1、參與觀察 31
2-2、深度訪談 34
第肆章、 研究分析 38
第一節、 全青盟的網上行動紀實 38
1-1、臉書(facebook) 38
1-2、Google的應用服務 47
1-3、批踢踢八卦板 51
1-4、網路直播軟體 55
1-5、數位編輯與剪輯軟體 57
1-6、小結 60
第二節、 數位原民的社運劇碼 65
2-1、準備好被搜尋,讓網路成為說帖 65
2-2、從烏合之眾到(半)公眾 68
2-3、我們不是組織,我們都只是網友 73
2-4、小結 78
第伍章、 結論 81
第一節、 主要研究發現與補充 81
第二節、 理論概念探討 84
2-1、腳本/去腳本 84
2-2、懶人行動主義 85
第三節、 研究貢獻與未來研究建議 86
參考文獻 88
附件、深度訪談邀訪信 97
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0984510021en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 網路社運zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 科技與社會zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 數位原民zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 媒體素養zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 參與文化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 腳本zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) cyber activismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Society, Technology, and Scienceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) digital nativeen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) media literacyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) participatory cultureen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) scripten_US
dc.title (題名) 鄉民全都「讚」出來:初探反國光石化運動的青年網路實踐zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Everybody "Like": Exploring internet practices in youth in Anti Guo-Kuang Petroleum Plant social movementen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 方俊育、李尚仁譯(2004)。〈從創新到使用:十道兼容並蓄的技術史史學題綱〉,《科技渴望性別》,台北:群學。(原文:Edgerton, D.. [1998]. From innovation to use: Ten eclectic theses on the historiography of technology. In R. Guesnerie, & F. Hartog (Eds), Des science et des techniques: un debat. (pp.259-288). Paris: Armand Colin.)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王惟芬、黃柏恒、楊雅婷譯(2011)。《一位數位移民的告白》。台北市:行人文化實驗室。(原書:Bilton, N.. [2010]. I live in the future and here’s how it works: Why your world, work, and brain are being creatively disrupted. NY: Crown Business.)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳國卿譯(2011)。《下班時間扭轉未來:休閒時間x網路連結=改變世界的決勝點》。台北:行人文化實驗室。(原書:Shirky, C.. [2010]. Cognitive surplus: Creativity and generosity in a connected age. NY: The Penguin Group.)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李明炫(2008)。《Web2.0下的社會運動:以樂生保留運動為例》。世新大學新聞學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 何明修(2011)。〈導論:探索台灣的運動社會〉,何明修、林秀幸(編),《社會運動的年代:晚近二十年來的台灣行動主義》,頁1-32。台北:群學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林國明、陳東升(2005)。〈審義民主、科技決策與公共討論〉,《科技、醫療與社會》,3: 1-50。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林鶴玲、鄭陸霖(2001)。〈臺灣社會運動網路經驗初探:一個探索性的分析〉,《臺灣社會學刊》,25: 1-39。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱佳心、張玉佩(2009)。〈想像與創作:同人誌的情慾文化探索〉,《資訊傳播學報》,6: 141-172。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 洪千晴(2010)。《正文以外─新聞記者的部落格書寫與社會運動:以野草莓學運為例》。世新大學資訊傳播學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡昌智譯(2011)。《維基解密─從地下駭客到挑戰世界強權的超級媒體》。台北:時報文化。(原書:Rosenbach, M., & Stark, H.. [2011]. Staatsfeind WikiLeaks. Germany: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 苗延威譯(2002)。《社會運動概論》,台北:巨流。(原書:della Porta, D., & Diani, M.. [1997]. Social movements: An introduction. Italy: La Nuova Italia.)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐詩思譯(2003)。《No Logo》。台北:時報。(原書:Klein, N. [2002]. No logo: Taking aim at the brand bullies. NY: St. Martins Press.)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 翁文靜(1990年5月28日)。〈小蜜蜂到處塗鴉,大學生打破神話──學運中的「噴漆文化」〉,《新新聞周刊》,168: 58-65。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 翁書偉(2010年5月)。〈替代能源系統的榮耀與哀愁─從瓦斯車在臺灣的困境談科技的政治鑲嵌〉,「2010年臺灣科技與社會學會第二屆年會」,高雄市楠梓區。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張玉佩、葉孟儒(2008)。〈美貌的詛咒:男性凝視在網路相簿的權力探索〉,《資訊社會研究》,15: 249-274。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 莊豐嘉(2011)。《台灣公民新聞崛起對公共政策之衝擊──從樂生、大埔到反國光石化事件之比較分析》。國立台灣大學政治學研究所在職專班碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳湘嵐(2004)。〈網際網路、替代性媒介與社會運動:以南方電子報為例〉。國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 程雅欣譯(2004)。〈民主、專業知識、和愛滋療法社會運動〉,《科技渴望性別》,台北:群學。(原文:Epstein, S.. [2000]. Democracy, expertise, and AIDS treatment activism. In D. L.Kleinman (Ed), Science, technology, and democracy. (pp.15-32). NY: State University of New York Press, Albany.)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃以敬(2011年2月28日)。〈中國防開茉莉花 成本逼近國防預算〉,《自由時報》,A4。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃金正(2008)。《從網路Kuso的言談情境論網路的政治參與》。南華大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃厚銘(2000)。〈網路人際關係的親疏遠近〉,《國立臺灣大學社會學刊》,28: 117-154。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃哲斌(2009)。《公民新聞的網路實踐─以樂生療養院事件為例》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊國斌(2009)。〈悲情與戲謔:網絡事件中的情感動員〉,《傳播與社會學刊》,9: 39-66。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 管中祥(2010年8月12日)。【另類媒體與社會運動】。未出版之演講資料。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 趙惠淨(2009)。〈網路、年輕人與臨時自治區〉,《新聞學研究》,101: 245-278。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉世鼎、勞麗珠(2010)。〈網路作為澳門的另類公共領域〉,《新聞學研究》,102: 253-293.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡炯青(2009)。《網際網路在民主政治的溝通過程研究─以野草莓學運為例》。世新大學傳播研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡培慧(2010)。〈真實是一場社會行動:反思台灣農村陣線的行動與組織〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,79: 319-339。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭君良(2003)。《非營利網站之經營策略研究:以「南方電子報」、「苦勞網」與「網氏/罔市女性電子報」為例》。南華大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭陸霖、林鶴玲(2001)。〈社運在網際網路上的展現:台灣社會運動網站的聯網分析〉,《台灣社會學》,2: 55-96。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 盧沛樺(2010年7月)。〈網路動員與青年公民參與:以PTT鄉民救災團為例〉,「2010年中華傳播學會暨第四屆數位國際學術研討會」,嘉義民雄。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝合勝(2010)。《線上共識動員研究─以2008年野草莓學生運動為例》。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 龐惠潔(2005)。《美麗人生:網路相簿社群的互動行為研究》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇文淑譯(2011)。《架構的生態系─資訊環境被如何設計至今?》。台北:大鴻藝術。(原書:Hamano, S.. [2008]. アーキテクチャの生態系 情報環境はいかに設計されてきたか Tokyo: NTT Publishing.)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 西文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Aelst, P. V., & Walgrave S. (2006). New media, new movement? The role of the internet in shaping the ‘anti-globalization’ movement. In W. van de Donk, B. D. Loader, P. G. Nixon, D. Rucht (Eds.), Cyberprotest (pp.97-122). London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Akrich, M.. (1994). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker, & J. Law (eds.) Shaping technology/ building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, (pp. 205-224). Cambridge, MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Benkler, Y.. (2004). Sharing nicely: On shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production. The Yale law journal, 114(2):273-358.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bennett, W. L., Breunig, C., & Givens, T.. (2008). Communication and political mobilization: Digital media and the organization of Anti-Iraq war demonstration in the U.S.. Political communication, 25: 269-289.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bennett, W. L.. (2006). Communication global activism: Strengths and vulnerabilities of networked politics. In W. van de Donk, B. D. Loader, P. G. Nixon, D. Rucht (Eds.), Cyberprotest (pp.123-146). London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bennett, W. L.. (2008). Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age. In W., Lance Bennett (Ed), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth(pp.1-24). NY: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Berker,T., Hartmann, M., Punie, Y., & Ward, K.. (2006). Introduction. In T. Berker, M. Hartmann, Y. Punie, & K. Ward. (eds.) Domestication of media and technology, (pp.1-17). England: Open University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., & Stohl, C.. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication theory, 15(4): 365-388.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bimber, B.. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. Washington, DC: Capitol Advantage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bollier, D.. (2005). Brand name bullies. US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) boyd, d., and Ellison, N., B.. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-mediated communication, 13(1): 210-230.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) boyd, d.. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham, Youth, identity, and digital media (pp.112-135). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Callon, M..(1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.) Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-233). London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carrington, V.. (2009). Digital culture, play, creativity: Trapped underground.jpg. In R. Willett, M, Robinson, & J. Marsh (eds.) Play, creativity, and digital cultures, (pp.143-199). NY: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Castells, M.. (1996). The rise of the network society. US: Blackwell Publishers Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Castells, M.. (2004). The power of identity. US: Wiley.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chadwick, A. (2007). Digital network repertoires and organizational hybridity. Political communication, 24: 283-301.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cowan, R. S. (1985). How the refrigerator got its hum. In D. Mackenzie & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The social shaping of technology (pp.202-218). England: Open University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dahlberg, L.. (2001). The internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, communication & society, 4(4): 615-633.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Davis, A.. (2009). New media and fat democracy: the paradox of online participation. New media & society, 11(8): 1-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DiMaggio P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., and Robinson, J. P.. (2001). Social implications of the internet. Annual review, 27: 307-336.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Elin, L..(2003). The radicalization of Zeke Spier: How the Internet contributes to civic engagement and new forms of social capital. In M. McCaughey, & M. D. Ayers (eds.) Cyberactivism: Online activism in theory and practice (pp.97-116). NY: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R.. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. Oxford: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gaines, B. J., and Mondak, J. J.. (2009). Typing together? Clustering of ideological types in online social networks. Journal of information technology & politics, 6: 216-231.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ganesh, S., & Stohl, C.. (2010). Qualifying engagement: A study of information and communication technology and the global social justice movement in Aotearoa New Zealand. Communication monographs, 77(1): 51-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Garrett, R. K.. (2006). Protest in and information society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, communication & society, 9(2): 202-224.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gil de Zúñiga, H., Puig-I-Abrul, E., & Rojas, H.. (2009). Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: An assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment. New media & society, 11(4): 553-574.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gil de Zúñiga, H., Veenstra, A., Vraga, E., & Shah, D.. (2010). Digital democracy: Reimagining pathways to political participation. Journal of information technology & politics, (7)1: 36-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hanemaayer, A..(2009). A grounded theory approach to engaging technology on the paintball field. In P. Vannini (ed.) Material culture and technology in everyday life, (pp.157-168). NY: Peter Lang Publishing.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Howley, K. (2005). Community media: People, places, and communication technologies. UK: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jenkins, H.. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. NY: New York University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jenkins, H.. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. London: The MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Johnson, T. J., Kaye, B.K., Bichard, S. L., & Wong, W. J.. (2008). Every blog has its day: Politically-interested internet users’ perceptions of blog credibility. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 13(1): 100-122.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jordan, T., & Taylor, P. A.. (2004). Hacktivism and cyberwars: Rebels with a cause? US: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keenan, A., & Shiri, A.. (2009). Sociability and social interaction on social networking websites. Library review, 58(6): 438-450.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kim, K. H., and Yun, H.. (2008). Cying for me, cying for us: Relational dialectics in a Korean social network site. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 13(1): 298-318.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kling, R.. (1996). Social relationships in electronic forum: Hangouts, salons, workplaces, and communities. In R. Kling (ed.) Computerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices (pp. 426-454). US: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mackey, M.. (2009). Exciting yet safe: The appeal of thick play and big worlds. In R. Willett, M, Robinson, & J. Marsh (eds.) Play, creativity, and digital cultures, (pp.92-107). NY: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Melucci, A.. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Merrill, B.. (2009). Making it, not making it: Creating music in everyday life. In P. Vannini (ed.) Material culture and technology in everyday life, (pp.193-209). NY: Peter Lang Publishing.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peretti, J. & Mcheletti, M. (2004). The Nike sweatshop emails: Political consumerism, Internet, and culture jamming. In M. Micheletti, A. Follesdal, & D. Stolle (eds.) Politics, products, and markets: Exploring political consumerism past and present (pp. 127-144). US: Transaction Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pinch, T..(2009). The social construction of technology (SCOT): The old, the new, and the nonhuman. In P. Vannini (ed.) Material culture and technology in everyday life, (pp.45-58). NY: Peter Lang Publishing.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Prensky, M.. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the horizon, 9(5): 1-6。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rheingold, H.. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. US: Perseus Books Group.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scheufele, D., & Nisbet, M.. (2002). Being a citizen online: New opportunities and dead ends. Harvard international journal of press/ politics, 7(3): 55-75.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sørensen, K., H. (2006). Domestication: the enactment of technology. In T. Berker, M. Hartmann, Y. Punie, & K. Ward. (eds.) Domestication of media and technology, (pp.40-61). England: Open University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sustein, C.R.. (2002). Republic. com. USA: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) van Laer, J., & van Aelst, P..(2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires: Opportunities and limitations. Information, communication & society, 13(8): 1146-1171.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wajcman, J. (2002). Addressing technological change: The challenge to social theory. Current sociology, 50(3): 347-363.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wallsten, K.. (2008). Political blogs: Transmission belts, soapboxs, mobilizers, or conversation starters? Journal of information technology & politics, 4(3): 19-40.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Walton, D. C.. (2008). Is modern information technology enabling the evolution of a more direct democracy? World futures, 63: 365-385.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Willett, R., & Robinson, M.. (2009). Introduction: Encountering play and creativity in everyday life. In R. Willett, M, Robinson, & J. Marsh (eds.) Play, creativity, and digital cultures, (pp.1-10). NY: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) William, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research Policy, 25, 865-899.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Xenos, M.. (2008). New mediated deliberation: Blogs and press coverage of the Alito nomination. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 13(2): 485-503.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 線上資料zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 何明修(2006年6月3日)。〈社會運動研究的社會學想像〉,《群學出版論壇》。上網日期:2010年10月26日,取自http://socio.com.tw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=146zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李雪莉(2012年1月13日)。〈340萬台灣青年 撼動總統大選〉,《陽光時務台灣總統大選特刊》。上網日期:2012年1月19日,取自http://www.isunaffairs.com/?p=2398zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 豆腐魚聽自言自語(2011年1月30日)。〈「國光石化撤案‧守護青年未來」行動有感〉。上網日期:2011年2月25日,取自http://blog.roodo.com/skydaughterzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張鐵志(2011年3月27日)。〈時代正在改變:台灣的八零後社運青年〉,《Sounds and Fury》。上網日期,2011年3月30日。取自http://blog.roodo.com/SoundsandFury/archives/15442987.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳信行譯(2008年12月25日)。〈無架構的暴政(THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS)〉,《文化研究月報》,第87期。上網日期:2010年10月15日,取自http://csat.org.tw/journal/Content.asp?Period=87&JC_ID=88zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳順孝(2008年12月8日)。〈野草莓運動的傳播分析(草稿)〉,《阿孝札記》。上網日期:2010年1月10日,取自http://www.ashaw.org/2008/12/post.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉美妤(2011年4月29日)。〈青年新遊戲對抗國家舊機器─反國光石化的文化行動〉,《破報》。上網日期:2011年6月18日,取自http://www.pots.com.tw/node/8052zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉致昕(2011年10月17日)。〈全球上千個城市跟進 青年火藥庫引爆〉,《商業周刊》,第1247期。上網日期:2011年10月31日,取自http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/webarticle.php?id=44764zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 賴珍琳(2008年6月25日)。〈掌握未來二十年得主流市場:解構台灣最大網路社群批踢踢(PTT)〉,《今周刊》,第601期。上網日期:2011年11月20日,取自http://www.businesstoday.com.tw/v1/content.aspx?a=W20080600180&p=2zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝昇佑(2011年6月2日)。〈沒有太多喜悅的勝仗:反國光石化運動的成與敗〉,《青平台電子報No.7》。上網日期:2012年1月20日,取自http://epaper.ystaiwan.org.tw/no7/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ball, J.. (8 November 2011). Two-thirds support social networking blackout in future riots. The Guardian. Retrieved November 24, 2011, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/nov/08/two-thirds-support-social-media-blackoutzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gladwell, M.. (4 October 2010). Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker. Retrieved December 25, 2010, from http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/04/101004fa_fact_gladwellzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ito, M.. (2009). Media literacy and social action in a Post-Pokemon world. A rough transcript of a keynote address for the 51st NFAIS annual conference. Retrieved October 8, 2011, from http://www.itofisher.com/mito/publications/media_literacy.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jenkins, H.. (2006, October 20). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century (Part one). Retrieved November 16, 2009, from http://www.henryjenkins.org/2006/10/confronting_the_challenges_of.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, B., Costello, T., & Brecher, J.. (2009, February. 2). Social movements 2.0. The Nation. Retrieved October 13, 2009, from http://www.thenation.com/article/social-movements-20zh_TW