dc.contributor.advisor | 李明 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 龔向華 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Bruyas, Dimitri | en_US |
dc.creator (作者) | 龔向華 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | Bruyas, Dimitri | en_US |
dc.date (日期) | 2009 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 17-Apr-2012 09:30:51 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 17-Apr-2012 09:30:51 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Apr-2012 09:30:51 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0094925045 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52844 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS) | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 94925045 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 98 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | With the recent signing of an economic cooperation pact between Taiwan and China, crossstraitrelations have entered a new era that could eventually make rapprochement a peaceful process.The Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), which is a free trade agreement in substance if not in name, is initially aimed at normalizing cross-strait economic relations, though it could further raise the issue of a possible freeze on U.S. arms sales to Taiwan. After all,if Taipei and Beijing are actively working on burying the hatchet, should the United States change its long-standing policy of providing weapons to Taiwan?Recall that the U.S. government’s decision to sell more than US$6 billion worth of military equipment to Taiwan earlier this year set off furious reprisals from Chinese authorities who summoned the U.S. ambassador and defense attaché in China and threatened to punish U.S. companies that make and sell weapons to Taiwan. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Chapter 1: Introduction 11. Research Topic 42. The Argument 63. The Assumptions, Primary Goals and Strategies 74. Conceptual Framework 84.1 Theoretical constraints of the international system 94.2 Taiwan’s position in the international immunity 95. Literature Review 105.1 Structural Realism, Anarchy and the International System 105.2 Kenneth Walt and the Study of International Relations 116. Methodology: Sources and Process 126.1 Sources Classification 126.2 Methodological Barriers 13Chapter 2: Conceptual Framework 151. Classical Realist Thinkers 161.1 Thucydides’ Account of the Peloponnesian War 161.2 St. Augustine and Human’s Nature 181.3 Niccolo Machiavelli and the Role of the Leadership 181.4 Thomas Hobbes and Anarchy 192. Hans Morgenthau and the Balance of Power 192.1 Relations Between Individuals and Relations Among Nations 202.2 Autonomy of the Politics, Morality and Power 212.3 International Politics and the Balance of Power 223. Kenneth Waltz: Structural Aspects of the Balance of Power 233.1 A scientific theory of international relations 243.2 Structure, Domestic and International Politics and Anarchy 273.3 Structures as Independent Determinants of Behavior 283.4 Economic and Political Effects of Anarchy 293.5 Anarchy and Change 314. Stephen Walt: Alliance Politics and the Balance-of-Threat 324.1 States’ Behavior in a Balance-of-Threats Theory 334.2 Factors Influencing the Level of Threat 345. Barry Posen and the Buck-Passing Strategy 355.1 The Origins of War 365.2 The Number of Great Powers and Buck-Passing Behaviors 36Chapter 3: Ambiguous Ambiguity 391. Strategic Ambiguity in Historical Perspective 401.1 The Second World War 401.2 Mutual Defense Treaty with Taipei 411.3 Normalization of Sino-American relations 431.4 Taiwan Relations Act 451.5 F-16 Arms sales and Taiwan Strait crisis 491.6 ‘Three noes’ policy vs. ‘State-to-state’ theory 511.7 Washington-Beijing-Taipei relations in the 21st century 522. The U.S. objectives in the Cross-Strait Stalemate 542.1 Commitment to Taiwan Defense 552.2 Commitment to the ‘Status Quo’ 55Chapter 4: Rise to Superpower Status 591. and the Sino-American Normalization 612.1 The Korean War and the Sino-Soviet Threat 612.2 The Jinmen Crises and the Rise of the Beijing Threat 652.3 The Sino-Soviet Split and the Expansion of the Soviet Threat 672.4 Sino-American Normalization and the Balance of Power 692.5 Arms sales to Taiwan 702. The American Factor in post-ECFA Cross-Strait Relations 722.1 The Fall of the Berlin Wall and the Rise of a Unipolar World 732.2 Balancing the United States 752.3 The signing of the ECFA 752.4 Washington views of the ECFA signing 793. Ma Ying-jeou’s pragmatic diplomacy 81Chapter 5: Conclusion 87Bibliography 92 | zh_TW |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094925045 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Cross-Strait Relation | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | U.S.-Taiwan Relations | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Triangular Relations | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | ECFA | en_US |
dc.title (題名) | The American factor across the Taiwan strait | en_US |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bernkopf Tucker, Nancy (Ed.), Dangerous Strait: The U.S. - Taiwan - China Crisis (New York: Columbia University, 2005) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bracken Paul, Fire in the East: The Rise of Asian Military Power (New York: Harper Collins,1999) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Burchill, Scott et al., Theories of International Relations (New York: Palgrave Macmillan (3rd Edition), 2005 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bush, George W. H. & Scowcroft, Brent, A World Transformed (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1998) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bush, Richard C., Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait (Washington:The Brookings Institution, 2005) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bush, Richard C., Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait (Washington:The Brookings Institution, 2005) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Clinton, Bill, My Life (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2004) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Clough, Ralph N. (1999), Cooperation and Conflict in the Taiwan Strait (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Crane, Gregory, Thucydides and the Ancient Simplicity: The Limits of Political Realism (Berkley: University of California Press, 1998) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dunne, T. & Kurki, M & Smith, S. (Eds.), International Relations: Discipline and Diversity (New York: Oxford University Press) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Edwards, Alistair & Townsend, Jules (Eds.), Interpreting Modern Political Philosophy: from Machiavelli to Marx (New York: Palgrave, 2002) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goldstein, Avery, Rising to the Challenge: China’s Grand Strategy and International Security (Stanford, California: Stanford University press, 2005) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goldstein, Steven M. & Johnston, Alistair I. & Ross, Robert S. (Ed.), Engaging China: The Management of an Emerging Power (London: Routledge, 1999) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Grene, David, Thucydides: The Peloponnesian War (Vol. I & II) (Toronto, Canada: University of Michigan, 1959) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Harisson, Ross, Hobbes, Locke and Confusion’s Masterpiece: An Examination of Seventeenth-century Political Philosophy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2003) | zh_TW |