1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 社會科學學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 以建構主義的觀點分析兩岸關係
A constructivist analysis of cross-strait relations
作者 何得中
Sebastian Hambach
貢獻者 袁易
Yuan, I
何得中
Sebastian Hambach
關鍵詞 建構主義
兩岸關係
一個中國
言語行為
現狀
constructivism
Cross-Strait relations
one China
speech acts
status quo
日期 2011
上傳時間 17-四月-2012 09:30:53 (UTC+8)
摘要 The purpose of this thesis is to analyze changes and constants of the Cross-Strait relationship since 1949 on the basis of a constructivist framework of International Relations theory. After having introduced basic assumptions of rule-based constructivism, mainly following Nicholas Onuf, the thesis argues that the Cross-Strait relationship can be analyzed as a social construct that has mainly been governed by the “one China” rule, which is designed and influenced by speech acts performed by relevant agents in Taiwan, China, the US, as well as academia.

A summary of the historic context of Cross-Strait relationship developments (1949-2000) which highlights the circumstances of the creation of the “one China” rule as well as gradual challenges to it, is followed by a comparison between the approaches of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Kuomintang (KMT) of constructing this relationship between 2000-2008 and 2008-2011, respectively. Due to the DPP`s and KMT`s very different ideologies, and their antithetic definitions of Taiwan`s relationship to China, there were distinct variations in their performances of speech acts, that are analyzed in the context of three discursive examples and which, together with related practices, aimed either at weakening (DPP) or strengthening (KMT) the “one China” rule as a cornerstone for Taiwan`s relationship to China.

Despite attempts by Taiwanese agents during the two consecutive DPP administrations to break the “one China” rule, it remains an important aspect of the Cross-Strait relationship as it is sustained, to different degrees, by agents in China, the US and the current KMT government. However, due to their adjustments over time and the development of Taiwan`s democratic system, a new “status quo” rule has steadily gained momentum. Therefore, the thesis argues, that it will be crucial to see how the preferences of the Taiwanese populace with respect to their home`s relationship to China will evolve in the future and how the relevant agents will respond to these developments.
參考文獻 1. ACHARYA, Amitav (1999): “International Relations Theory and Cross-Strait Relations,” Paper presented at The International Forum on Peace and Security in the Taiwan-Strait, Taipei, Taiwan, July 26-28, 1999, via: http://www.taiwansecurity.org/IS/Acharya-International-Relations-Theory-and-Cross-Strait-Relations.htm (accessed: 11 April 2011).
2. ADLER, Emanuel (1997): “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics,” in: European Journal of International Relations, 3, 319-363.
3. ANDRADE, Tonio (2008): How Taiwan Became Chinese. New York: Columbia University Press.
4. AUSTIN, John L. (1962): How to Do Things With Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5. BERNKOPF TUCKER, Nancy / Bonnie GLASER (2011): “Should the United States Abandon Taiwan?” in: The Washington Quarterly, 34, 4, 23-37.
6. BROWN, Melissa J. (2004): Is Taiwan Chinese? The Impact of Culture, Power, and Migration on Changing Identities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. BUSH, Richard, C. (2004): At Cross Purposes: U.S.-Taiwan Relations Since 1942. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
8. BUZAN, Barry, Charles JONES, Richard LITTLE (1993): The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.
9. CHAO, Chien-min / Chih-chia HSU (2006): “China Isolates Taiwan,” in: Friedman, Edward (ed.): China`s Rise, Taiwan`s Dilemmas and International Peace. London: Routledge, 41-67.
10. CHAO, Chien-min / Bruce J. DICKSON (2002): “Introduction: Assessing the Lee Teng-hui Legacy,” in: Dickson, Bruce / Chao Chien-min (eds.): Assessing the Lee Teng-hui Legacy in Taiwan`s Politics: Democratic Consolidation and External Relations. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 3-26.
11. CHAO, Linda / Ramon H. MYERS (1994): “The First Chinese Democracy: Political Development of the Republic of China on Taiwan,” in: Asian Survey, 34, 3, 213-230.
12. CHECKEL, Jeffrey T. (1998): “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory,” in: World Politics, 50, 2, 324-348.
13. CHEN, Yi-shen / HSUEH Hua-yuan / LI Ming-juinn / HU Ching-shan (2005): Taiwan`s International Status: History and Theory. Taipei: Taiwan Advocates.
14. CHENG, Marc Chia-Ching (2008): “The U.S. Perception of Taiwan`s Sovereignty and the Future of Cross-Strait Relations,” in: Issues & Studies, 44, 3, 71-97.
15. CHU, Shulong (2011): “Communication for Better Understanding and Improvement of Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations, Brookings North East Asia Commentary,” 50, via: http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2011/
06_cross_strait_shulong.aspx (accessed: 2011-11-20).
16. CLOUGH, Ralph N. (1993): “Chiang Ching-Kuo`s Policies Toward Mainland China and the Outside World,” in: Leng, Shao-Chuan (ed.) (1993): Chiang Ching-Kuo`s Leadership in the Development of the Republic on Taiwan. Lanham: University Press of America, 133-162.
17. COPPER, John F. (ed.) (2002): Taiwan in Troubled Times: Essays on the Chen Shui-bian Presidency. London: World Scientific.
18. COPPER, John F. (2011): “Why We Need Taiwan,” in: The National Interest, via: http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/why-we-need-taiwan-5815 (accessed: 2011-11-20).
19. DAVISON, Gary Marvin (2003): A Short History of Taiwan: The Case for Independence. Westport: Praeger.
20. DELISLE, Jacques (2008): “Vicious Cycles and Virtuous Circles: International Contexts, Taiwanese Democracy and Cross-Strait Relations,” in: Yuan, I (ed.): Cross-Strait at the Turning Point: Institution, Identity and Democracy. Taipei: Institute of International Relations, National Chengchi University, 373-423.
21. DICKSON, Bruce J. (2002): “Taiwan`s Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy,” in: Dickson, Bruce / Chao Chien-min (eds.): Assessing the Lee Teng-hui Legacy in Taiwan`s Politics: Democratic Consolidation and External Relations. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 264-285.
22. DITTMER, Lowell (2006): “Taiwan as a Factor in China`s Quest for National Identity,” Journal of Contemporary China, 15, 49, 671-686.
23. DIKÖTTER, Frank (2010): “Forging National Unity: Ideas of Race in China,” via: http://www.worlddialogue.org/content.php?id=489 (accessed: 2011-10-29).
24. FRIEDMAN, Edward (2006): “China`s Dilemma on Using Military Force,” in: Friedman, Edward (ed.): China`s Rise, Taiwan`s Dilemmas and International Peace. London: Routledge, 205-226.
25. GOLDSTEIN, Steven M. / Randall SCHRIVER (2001): “An Uncertain Relationship: The United States, Taiwan and the Taiwan Relations Act,” in: Edmonds, Richard Louis / Steven M. Goldstein (eds.): Taiwan in the Twentieth Century: A Retrospective View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 147-172.
26. GLASER, Bonnie (2010): Building Trust Across the Taiwan Strait: A Role for Military Confidence-building Measures. Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
27. HAO, Zhidong (2010): Whither Taiwan and Mainland China: National Identity, the State, and Intellectuals. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
28. HARRISON, Mark (2006): Legitimacy, Meaning and Knowledge in the Making of Taiwanese Identity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
29. HARTZELL, Richard W. / Roger C.S. LIN (2007): “The Status of the Republic of China on Taiwan as a Government in Exile,” via: http://www.taiwankey.net/
dc/rocexile.htm (accessed: 2011-11-20).
30. HSIAO, Russell (2011): “Taiwan Pivots in the South China Sea,” China Brief, 11, 11, via: http://www.jamestown.org/programs/chinabrief/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=38067&cHash=a532245963039aa11786b9d1ca5d332e (accessed: 2011-11-20).
31. HSIAU, A-chin (2005): “The Indigenization of Taiwanese Literature: Historical Narrative, Strategic Essentialism, and State Violence,” in: John Makeham / Hsiau A-chin (eds.): Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan: Bentuhua. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 125-155.
32. HSU, S. Philip (2010): “Reappraising the Debate and Practice of US Strategic Ambiguity/Clarity in Cross-Strait Relations,” in: The Pacific Review, 23, 2, 139-162.
33. HSUEH, Hua-yuan / TAI Pao-tsun / CHOU Mei-li (2005): Is Taiwan Chinese? A History of Taiwanese Nationality. Taipei: Taiwan Advocates.
34. HUANG, Jing / Xiaoting LI (2010): Inseparable Separation: The Making of China`s Taiwan Policy. Singapore: World Scientific.
35. JACOBS, J. Bruce (2006): “One China, Diplomatic Isolation and a Separate Taiwan,” in: Friedman, Edward (ed.): China`s Rise, Taiwan`s Dilemmas and International Peace. London: Routledge, 85-109.
36. JACOBS, J. Bruce / I-hao Ben LIU (2007): “Lee Teng-hui and the Idea of `Taiwan`,” in: The China Quarterly, 190, 375-393.
37. KLOTZ, Audie / Cecelia LYNCH (2007): Strategies for Research in Constructivist International Relations. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
38. KLOTZ, Audie / Deepa PRAKASH (eds.) (2008): Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
39. KUBÁLKOVÁ, Vendulka, Nicholas ONUF, Paul KOWERT (eds.) (1998): International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
40. KUBÁLKOVÁ, Vendulka (ed.) (2001): Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
41. KUBÁLKOVÁ, Vendulka (2001): “A Constructivist Primer,” in: Kubálková, Vendulka (ed.): Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 56-76.
42. KRATOCHWIL, Friedrich (1989): Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. KUO, Julian J. (2002): “Cross-Strait Relations: Buying Time Without Strategy,” in: Dickson, Bruce / Chao Chien-min (eds.): Assessing the Lee Teng-hui Legacy in Taiwan`s Politics: Democratic Consolidation and External Relations. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 204-217.
44. LENG, Shao-Chuan (ed.) (1993): Chiang Ching-Kuo`s Leadership in the Development of the Republic on Taiwan. Lanham: University Press of America.
45. LIN, Jih-wen (2002): “Transition Through Transaction: Taiwan`s Constitutional Reforms in the Lee Teng-hui Era,” in: American Asian Review, 20, 2, 123-155.
46. MEI, Fu S. (2011): “Taiwan`s Defense White Paper Shows New Candor on Challenges Ahead,” in: China Brief, 11, 16, via: http://www.jamestown.org/
programs/chinabrief/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=38360&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=25&cHash=2cb0380d3e0301fadcea86b1d132de95 (accessed: 2011-11-20).
47. MO, Ta-hua (2002): “The Prototype, Categorization, and Debates of Constructivism: Onuf, Kratochwil, and Wendt,” in: Issues & Studies, 41, 5, 111-148. (Chinese)
48. MYERS, Ramon H. / Jialin ZHANG (2006): The Struggle Across the Taiwan Strait: The Divided China Problem. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.
49. NATHAN, J. Andrew / Helena V. S. HO (1993): “Chiang Ching-Kuo`s Decision for Political Reform,” in: Leng, Shao-Chuan (ed.) (1993): Chiang Ching-Kuo`s Leadership in the Development of the Republic on Taiwan. Lanham: University Press of America, 31-61.
50. NOBLE, Gregory W. (1999): “Opportunity Lost: Partisan Incentives and the 1997 Constitutional Revisions in Taiwan,” in: The China Journal, 41, 89-114.
51. ONUF, Nicholas (1989): World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
52. ONUF, Nicholas (1998): “Constructivism: A User`s Manual,” in: Kubálková, Vendulka, Nicholas Onuf, Paul Kowert (eds.): International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 58-78.
53. ONUF, Nicholas (2001): “Speaking of Policy,” in: Kubálková, Vendulka (ed.) (2001): Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 77-94.
54. ONUF, Nicholas (2002): “Worlds of Our Making: The Strange Career of Constructivism in International Relations,” in: Puchala, Donald J. (ed.): Visions of International Relations: Assessing an Academic Field. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 119-141.
55. PETTMAN, Ralph (2001): “Commonsense Constructivism and Foreign Policy: A Critique of Rule-Oriented Constructivism,” in: Kubálková, Vendulka (ed.) (2001): Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 249-265.
56. PHILLIPS, Steven E. (2003): Between Assimilation and Independence: The Taiwanese Encounter Nationalist China, 1945-1950. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
57. QIANG, Xin (2010): “Beyond Power Politics: Institution-Building and Mainland China`s Taiwan Policy Transition,” in: Journal of Contemporary China, 19, 65, 525-539.
58. SCHUBERT, Gunter (2002): China`s Struggle for the Nation: Dimensions of Nationalist Thought in the People`s Republic of China, Taiwan, and Hongkong at the Turn to the 21st Century. Hamburg: Institut für Asienkunde. (German)
59. SEARLE, John R. (1969): Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. SHENG, Lijun (2001): China`s Dilemma: The Taiwan Issue. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
61. SHIH, Chih-yu (2009): “The Political Psychology of Cross-Strait Relations: Identity and Image in Political Sentiment Analysis,” in: Bau, Tzong-Ho, Wu Yu-Shan (eds.): Revisiting Theories on Cross-Strait Relations, 195-215. (Chinese)
62. SHIH, Ming (2003): Taiwan Is not a Part of China: The Four-hundred Year History of the Development of Taiwan`s Society. Taipei: Avanguard. (Chinese)
63. SMITH, Steve (2001): “Foreign Policy Is What States Make of It: Social Construction and International Relations Theory,” in: Kubálková, Vendulka (ed.): Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 38-55.
64. SU, Chi / CHENG An-kuo (eds.) (2002): “One China, with Respective Interpretations:” A Historical Account of the Consensus of 1992. Taipei: National Policy Foundation. (Chinese).
65. STANFORD PROGRAM ON INTERNATIONAL AND CROSS-CULTURAL EDUCATION (2004): Introduction to Sovereignty: A Case Study of Taiwan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
66. SUTTER, Robert (2008): “Emerging American Debate and Implications for U.S. China Policy,” in: Yuan, I (ed.): Cross-Strait at the Turning Point: Institution, Identity and Democracy. Taipei: Institute of International Relations, National Chengchi University, 25-36.
67. SWAINE, Michael D. (2011): “China, Taiwan, U.S.: Status Quo Challenged,” in: The National Interest, via: http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/us-provoking-china-over-taiwan-5996 (accessed: 2011-11-20).
68. WACHMAN, Alan M. (1994): Taiwan: National Identity and Democratization. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
69. WANG, Horng-Luen (2004): “National Culture and Its Discontents: The Politics of Heritage and Language in Taiwan, 1949-2003,” in: Comparative Studies in Society and History, 46, 4, 786-815.
70. WANG, Gabe T. (2006): China and the Taiwan Issue: Impending War at Taiwan Strait. Lanham: University Press of America.
71. WANG, Hongying / LU Yeh-Chung (2008): “The Conception of Soft Power and Its Policy Implications: A Comparative Study of China and Taiwan,” in: Journal of Contemporary China, 17, 56, 425-447.
72. WEBER, Cynthia (2010): International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. 3rd Ed. New York: Routledge.
73. WENDT, Alexander (1992): “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” in: International Organization, 46, 2, 391-425.
74. WENDT, Alexander (1999): Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. WU, Der-yuan Maxwell (2005a): “Canada and the Global Diffusion of `One China,`” in: Lecours, André (ed.): New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 319-340.
76. WU, Yu-Shan (2000): “Theorizing on Relations Across the Taiwan Strait: Nine Contending Approaches,” in: Journal of Contemporary China, 9, 25, 407-428.
77. WU, Yu-Shan (2005b): “Taiwan`s Domestic Politics and Cross-Strait Relations,” in: The China Journal, 53, 35-60.
78. WU, Yu-Shan (2007): “Taiwan`s Developmental State: After the Economic and Political Turmoil,” in: Asian Survey, 47, 6, 977-1001.
79. YUAN, I (1995): “Cooperation under Anarchy: Paradoxes of the Intra-Chinese Rapprochement,” in: Issues & Studies, 31, 2, 54-66.
80. ZEHFUSS, Maja (2001): “Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liaison,” in: European Journal of International Relations, 7, 3, 315-348.
81. ZEHFUSS, Maja (2002): Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. ZHAO, Suisheng (2002): “Reunification Strategy: Beijing Versus Lee Teng-hui,” in: Dickson, Bruce / Chao Chien-min (eds.): Assessing the Lee Teng-hui Legacy in Taiwan`s Politics: Democratic Consolidation and External Relations. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 218-240.
83. ZHENG, Shiping (2001): “Making Sense of the Conflict Between Mainland China and Taiwan,” in: Kubálková, Vendulka (ed.): Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 203-226.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
98926024
100
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098926024
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 袁易zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Yuan, Ien_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 何得中zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Sebastian Hambachen_US
dc.creator (作者) 何得中zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Sebastian Hambachen_US
dc.date (日期) 2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-四月-2012 09:30:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-四月-2012 09:30:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-四月-2012 09:30:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0098926024en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52845-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 98926024zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 100zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of this thesis is to analyze changes and constants of the Cross-Strait relationship since 1949 on the basis of a constructivist framework of International Relations theory. After having introduced basic assumptions of rule-based constructivism, mainly following Nicholas Onuf, the thesis argues that the Cross-Strait relationship can be analyzed as a social construct that has mainly been governed by the “one China” rule, which is designed and influenced by speech acts performed by relevant agents in Taiwan, China, the US, as well as academia.

A summary of the historic context of Cross-Strait relationship developments (1949-2000) which highlights the circumstances of the creation of the “one China” rule as well as gradual challenges to it, is followed by a comparison between the approaches of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Kuomintang (KMT) of constructing this relationship between 2000-2008 and 2008-2011, respectively. Due to the DPP`s and KMT`s very different ideologies, and their antithetic definitions of Taiwan`s relationship to China, there were distinct variations in their performances of speech acts, that are analyzed in the context of three discursive examples and which, together with related practices, aimed either at weakening (DPP) or strengthening (KMT) the “one China” rule as a cornerstone for Taiwan`s relationship to China.

Despite attempts by Taiwanese agents during the two consecutive DPP administrations to break the “one China” rule, it remains an important aspect of the Cross-Strait relationship as it is sustained, to different degrees, by agents in China, the US and the current KMT government. However, due to their adjustments over time and the development of Taiwan`s democratic system, a new “status quo” rule has steadily gained momentum. Therefore, the thesis argues, that it will be crucial to see how the preferences of the Taiwanese populace with respect to their home`s relationship to China will evolve in the future and how the relevant agents will respond to these developments.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 1. Introduction 7

2. Analytical Framework 7
2.1 Constructivism 7
2.2 Rules 13
2.3 Speech Acts 18
2.4 Agents 22
2.5 Rule-based Constructivism and Cross-Strait Relations 25

3. Historical Background: The Development of Cross-Strait Relations, 1949-2000 30
3.1 Introduction 30
3.2 Cross-Strait Relations in the Context of the Cold War 30
3.2.1 The Inception of the "One China" Rule 30
3.2.2 Cross-Strait Relations and the Impact of Taiwan`s Democratization 37
3.3 Cross-Strait Relations Under the Trend of Taiwanization 43
3.3.1 From Rapprochement to Flexible Interpretations of "One China" 43
3.3.2 Towards Open Challenges of the "One China" Rule 51
3.4 Academic Construction of Cross-Strait Relations: Some Thoughts 59
3.5 Conclusion 61

4. A Constructivist Analysis of Recent Cross-Strait Relations, 2000-2011 67
4.1 Introduction 67
4.2 Challenging the Rules: DPP Rule Under Chen Shui-bian, 2000-2008 68
4.2.1 Taiwan`s Status and the Republic of China Constitution 68
4.2.2 The "1992 Consensus" 79
4.2.3 Chinese Nation and Cultural Assumptions 89
4.3 Revitalizing the Rules: KMT Rule Under Ma Ying-jeou, 2008-2011 92
4.3.1 Taiwan`s Status and the Republic of China Constitution 92
4.3.2 The "1992 Consensus" 101
4.3.3 Chinese Nation and Cultural Assumptions 106
4.4 Academic Construction of Cross-Strait Relations: New Trends 111
4.5 Conclusion 115

5. Conclusion 122

6. References 130
6.1 Source Materials 130
6.1.1 Documents, Speeches, Interviews 130
6.1.2 Online Sources for Newspaper and Journal Articles 134
6.2 Secondary Literature 134

7. Appendix 140
MAC Poll: Unification or Independence (2001-2007) 140
7.1 NCCU Election Study Center Poll: Unification-Independence 141
7.2 NCCU Election Study Center Poll: Taiwanese/Chinese Identity 141		zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098926024en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 建構主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 兩岸關係zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 一個中國zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 言語行為zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 現狀zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) constructivismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Cross-Strait relationsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) one Chinaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) speech actsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) status quoen_US
dc.title (題名) 以建構主義的觀點分析兩岸關係zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A constructivist analysis of cross-strait relationsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. ACHARYA, Amitav (1999): “International Relations Theory and Cross-Strait Relations,” Paper presented at The International Forum on Peace and Security in the Taiwan-Strait, Taipei, Taiwan, July 26-28, 1999, via: http://www.taiwansecurity.org/IS/Acharya-International-Relations-Theory-and-Cross-Strait-Relations.htm (accessed: 11 April 2011).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. ADLER, Emanuel (1997): “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics,” in: European Journal of International Relations, 3, 319-363.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. ANDRADE, Tonio (2008): How Taiwan Became Chinese. New York: Columbia University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. AUSTIN, John L. (1962): How to Do Things With Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. BERNKOPF TUCKER, Nancy / Bonnie GLASER (2011): “Should the United States Abandon Taiwan?” in: The Washington Quarterly, 34, 4, 23-37.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. BROWN, Melissa J. (2004): Is Taiwan Chinese? The Impact of Culture, Power, and Migration on Changing Identities. Berkeley: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. BUSH, Richard, C. (2004): At Cross Purposes: U.S.-Taiwan Relations Since 1942. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. BUZAN, Barry, Charles JONES, Richard LITTLE (1993): The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. CHAO, Chien-min / Chih-chia HSU (2006): “China Isolates Taiwan,” in: Friedman, Edward (ed.): China`s Rise, Taiwan`s Dilemmas and International Peace. London: Routledge, 41-67.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. CHAO, Chien-min / Bruce J. DICKSON (2002): “Introduction: Assessing the Lee Teng-hui Legacy,” in: Dickson, Bruce / Chao Chien-min (eds.): Assessing the Lee Teng-hui Legacy in Taiwan`s Politics: Democratic Consolidation and External Relations. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 3-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. CHAO, Linda / Ramon H. MYERS (1994): “The First Chinese Democracy: Political Development of the Republic of China on Taiwan,” in: Asian Survey, 34, 3, 213-230.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. CHECKEL, Jeffrey T. (1998): “The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory,” in: World Politics, 50, 2, 324-348.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13. CHEN, Yi-shen / HSUEH Hua-yuan / LI Ming-juinn / HU Ching-shan (2005): Taiwan`s International Status: History and Theory. Taipei: Taiwan Advocates.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14. CHENG, Marc Chia-Ching (2008): “The U.S. Perception of Taiwan`s Sovereignty and the Future of Cross-Strait Relations,” in: Issues & Studies, 44, 3, 71-97.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15. CHU, Shulong (2011): “Communication for Better Understanding and Improvement of Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations, Brookings North East Asia Commentary,” 50, via: http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2011/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 06_cross_strait_shulong.aspx (accessed: 2011-11-20).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16. CLOUGH, Ralph N. (1993): “Chiang Ching-Kuo`s Policies Toward Mainland China and the Outside World,” in: Leng, Shao-Chuan (ed.) (1993): Chiang Ching-Kuo`s Leadership in the Development of the Republic on Taiwan. Lanham: University Press of America, 133-162.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17. COPPER, John F. (ed.) (2002): Taiwan in Troubled Times: Essays on the Chen Shui-bian Presidency. London: World Scientific.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18. COPPER, John F. (2011): “Why We Need Taiwan,” in: The National Interest, via: http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/why-we-need-taiwan-5815 (accessed: 2011-11-20).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19. DAVISON, Gary Marvin (2003): A Short History of Taiwan: The Case for Independence. Westport: Praeger.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20. DELISLE, Jacques (2008): “Vicious Cycles and Virtuous Circles: International Contexts, Taiwanese Democracy and Cross-Strait Relations,” in: Yuan, I (ed.): Cross-Strait at the Turning Point: Institution, Identity and Democracy. Taipei: Institute of International Relations, National Chengchi University, 373-423.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21. DICKSON, Bruce J. (2002): “Taiwan`s Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy,” in: Dickson, Bruce / Chao Chien-min (eds.): Assessing the Lee Teng-hui Legacy in Taiwan`s Politics: Democratic Consolidation and External Relations. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 264-285.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22. DITTMER, Lowell (2006): “Taiwan as a Factor in China`s Quest for National Identity,” Journal of Contemporary China, 15, 49, 671-686.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23. DIKÖTTER, Frank (2010): “Forging National Unity: Ideas of Race in China,” via: http://www.worlddialogue.org/content.php?id=489 (accessed: 2011-10-29).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24. FRIEDMAN, Edward (2006): “China`s Dilemma on Using Military Force,” in: Friedman, Edward (ed.): China`s Rise, Taiwan`s Dilemmas and International Peace. London: Routledge, 205-226.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25. GOLDSTEIN, Steven M. / Randall SCHRIVER (2001): “An Uncertain Relationship: The United States, Taiwan and the Taiwan Relations Act,” in: Edmonds, Richard Louis / Steven M. Goldstein (eds.): Taiwan in the Twentieth Century: A Retrospective View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 147-172.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26. GLASER, Bonnie (2010): Building Trust Across the Taiwan Strait: A Role for Military Confidence-building Measures. Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27. HAO, Zhidong (2010): Whither Taiwan and Mainland China: National Identity, the State, and Intellectuals. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28. HARRISON, Mark (2006): Legitimacy, Meaning and Knowledge in the Making of Taiwanese Identity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 29. HARTZELL, Richard W. / Roger C.S. LIN (2007): “The Status of the Republic of China on Taiwan as a Government in Exile,” via: http://www.taiwankey.net/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) dc/rocexile.htm (accessed: 2011-11-20).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 30. HSIAO, Russell (2011): “Taiwan Pivots in the South China Sea,” China Brief, 11, 11, via: http://www.jamestown.org/programs/chinabrief/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=38067&cHash=a532245963039aa11786b9d1ca5d332e (accessed: 2011-11-20).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 31. HSIAU, A-chin (2005): “The Indigenization of Taiwanese Literature: Historical Narrative, Strategic Essentialism, and State Violence,” in: John Makeham / Hsiau A-chin (eds.): Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan: Bentuhua. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 125-155.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 32. HSU, S. Philip (2010): “Reappraising the Debate and Practice of US Strategic Ambiguity/Clarity in Cross-Strait Relations,” in: The Pacific Review, 23, 2, 139-162.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 33. HSUEH, Hua-yuan / TAI Pao-tsun / CHOU Mei-li (2005): Is Taiwan Chinese? A History of Taiwanese Nationality. Taipei: Taiwan Advocates.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 34. HUANG, Jing / Xiaoting LI (2010): Inseparable Separation: The Making of China`s Taiwan Policy. Singapore: World Scientific.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 35. JACOBS, J. Bruce (2006): “One China, Diplomatic Isolation and a Separate Taiwan,” in: Friedman, Edward (ed.): China`s Rise, Taiwan`s Dilemmas and International Peace. London: Routledge, 85-109.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 36. JACOBS, J. Bruce / I-hao Ben LIU (2007): “Lee Teng-hui and the Idea of `Taiwan`,” in: The China Quarterly, 190, 375-393.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 37. KLOTZ, Audie / Cecelia LYNCH (2007): Strategies for Research in Constructivist International Relations. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 38. KLOTZ, Audie / Deepa PRAKASH (eds.) (2008): Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 39. KUBÁLKOVÁ, Vendulka, Nicholas ONUF, Paul KOWERT (eds.) (1998): International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 40. KUBÁLKOVÁ, Vendulka (ed.) (2001): Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 41. KUBÁLKOVÁ, Vendulka (2001): “A Constructivist Primer,” in: Kubálková, Vendulka (ed.): Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 56-76.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 42. KRATOCHWIL, Friedrich (1989): Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 43. KUO, Julian J. (2002): “Cross-Strait Relations: Buying Time Without Strategy,” in: Dickson, Bruce / Chao Chien-min (eds.): Assessing the Lee Teng-hui Legacy in Taiwan`s Politics: Democratic Consolidation and External Relations. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 204-217.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 44. LENG, Shao-Chuan (ed.) (1993): Chiang Ching-Kuo`s Leadership in the Development of the Republic on Taiwan. Lanham: University Press of America.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 45. LIN, Jih-wen (2002): “Transition Through Transaction: Taiwan`s Constitutional Reforms in the Lee Teng-hui Era,” in: American Asian Review, 20, 2, 123-155.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 46. MEI, Fu S. (2011): “Taiwan`s Defense White Paper Shows New Candor on Challenges Ahead,” in: China Brief, 11, 16, via: http://www.jamestown.org/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) programs/chinabrief/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=38360&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=25&cHash=2cb0380d3e0301fadcea86b1d132de95 (accessed: 2011-11-20).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 47. MO, Ta-hua (2002): “The Prototype, Categorization, and Debates of Constructivism: Onuf, Kratochwil, and Wendt,” in: Issues & Studies, 41, 5, 111-148. (Chinese)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 48. MYERS, Ramon H. / Jialin ZHANG (2006): The Struggle Across the Taiwan Strait: The Divided China Problem. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 49. NATHAN, J. Andrew / Helena V. S. HO (1993): “Chiang Ching-Kuo`s Decision for Political Reform,” in: Leng, Shao-Chuan (ed.) (1993): Chiang Ching-Kuo`s Leadership in the Development of the Republic on Taiwan. Lanham: University Press of America, 31-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 50. NOBLE, Gregory W. (1999): “Opportunity Lost: Partisan Incentives and the 1997 Constitutional Revisions in Taiwan,” in: The China Journal, 41, 89-114.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 51. ONUF, Nicholas (1989): World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 52. ONUF, Nicholas (1998): “Constructivism: A User`s Manual,” in: Kubálková, Vendulka, Nicholas Onuf, Paul Kowert (eds.): International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 58-78.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 53. ONUF, Nicholas (2001): “Speaking of Policy,” in: Kubálková, Vendulka (ed.) (2001): Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 77-94.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 54. ONUF, Nicholas (2002): “Worlds of Our Making: The Strange Career of Constructivism in International Relations,” in: Puchala, Donald J. (ed.): Visions of International Relations: Assessing an Academic Field. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 119-141.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 55. PETTMAN, Ralph (2001): “Commonsense Constructivism and Foreign Policy: A Critique of Rule-Oriented Constructivism,” in: Kubálková, Vendulka (ed.) (2001): Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 249-265.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 56. PHILLIPS, Steven E. (2003): Between Assimilation and Independence: The Taiwanese Encounter Nationalist China, 1945-1950. Stanford: Stanford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 57. QIANG, Xin (2010): “Beyond Power Politics: Institution-Building and Mainland China`s Taiwan Policy Transition,” in: Journal of Contemporary China, 19, 65, 525-539.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 58. SCHUBERT, Gunter (2002): China`s Struggle for the Nation: Dimensions of Nationalist Thought in the People`s Republic of China, Taiwan, and Hongkong at the Turn to the 21st Century. Hamburg: Institut für Asienkunde. (German)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 59. SEARLE, John R. (1969): Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 60. SHENG, Lijun (2001): China`s Dilemma: The Taiwan Issue. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 61. SHIH, Chih-yu (2009): “The Political Psychology of Cross-Strait Relations: Identity and Image in Political Sentiment Analysis,” in: Bau, Tzong-Ho, Wu Yu-Shan (eds.): Revisiting Theories on Cross-Strait Relations, 195-215. (Chinese)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 62. SHIH, Ming (2003): Taiwan Is not a Part of China: The Four-hundred Year History of the Development of Taiwan`s Society. Taipei: Avanguard. (Chinese)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 63. SMITH, Steve (2001): “Foreign Policy Is What States Make of It: Social Construction and International Relations Theory,” in: Kubálková, Vendulka (ed.): Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 38-55.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 64. SU, Chi / CHENG An-kuo (eds.) (2002): “One China, with Respective Interpretations:” A Historical Account of the Consensus of 1992. Taipei: National Policy Foundation. (Chinese).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 65. STANFORD PROGRAM ON INTERNATIONAL AND CROSS-CULTURAL EDUCATION (2004): Introduction to Sovereignty: A Case Study of Taiwan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 66. SUTTER, Robert (2008): “Emerging American Debate and Implications for U.S. China Policy,” in: Yuan, I (ed.): Cross-Strait at the Turning Point: Institution, Identity and Democracy. Taipei: Institute of International Relations, National Chengchi University, 25-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 67. SWAINE, Michael D. (2011): “China, Taiwan, U.S.: Status Quo Challenged,” in: The National Interest, via: http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/us-provoking-china-over-taiwan-5996 (accessed: 2011-11-20).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 68. WACHMAN, Alan M. (1994): Taiwan: National Identity and Democratization. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 69. WANG, Horng-Luen (2004): “National Culture and Its Discontents: The Politics of Heritage and Language in Taiwan, 1949-2003,” in: Comparative Studies in Society and History, 46, 4, 786-815.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 70. WANG, Gabe T. (2006): China and the Taiwan Issue: Impending War at Taiwan Strait. Lanham: University Press of America.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 71. WANG, Hongying / LU Yeh-Chung (2008): “The Conception of Soft Power and Its Policy Implications: A Comparative Study of China and Taiwan,” in: Journal of Contemporary China, 17, 56, 425-447.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 72. WEBER, Cynthia (2010): International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. 3rd Ed. New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 73. WENDT, Alexander (1992): “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” in: International Organization, 46, 2, 391-425.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 74. WENDT, Alexander (1999): Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 75. WU, Der-yuan Maxwell (2005a): “Canada and the Global Diffusion of `One China,`” in: Lecours, André (ed.): New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 319-340.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 76. WU, Yu-Shan (2000): “Theorizing on Relations Across the Taiwan Strait: Nine Contending Approaches,” in: Journal of Contemporary China, 9, 25, 407-428.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 77. WU, Yu-Shan (2005b): “Taiwan`s Domestic Politics and Cross-Strait Relations,” in: The China Journal, 53, 35-60.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 78. WU, Yu-Shan (2007): “Taiwan`s Developmental State: After the Economic and Political Turmoil,” in: Asian Survey, 47, 6, 977-1001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 79. YUAN, I (1995): “Cooperation under Anarchy: Paradoxes of the Intra-Chinese Rapprochement,” in: Issues & Studies, 31, 2, 54-66.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 80. ZEHFUSS, Maja (2001): “Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liaison,” in: European Journal of International Relations, 7, 3, 315-348.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 81. ZEHFUSS, Maja (2002): Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 82. ZHAO, Suisheng (2002): “Reunification Strategy: Beijing Versus Lee Teng-hui,” in: Dickson, Bruce / Chao Chien-min (eds.): Assessing the Lee Teng-hui Legacy in Taiwan`s Politics: Democratic Consolidation and External Relations. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 218-240.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 83. ZHENG, Shiping (2001): “Making Sense of the Conflict Between Mainland China and Taiwan,” in: Kubálková, Vendulka (ed.): Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 203-226.zh_TW