學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 Dwelling in the Nearness of Gods: A Hermeneutic Turn from Mou Zongsan to Tu Weiming
作者 林鎮國
Lin, Chen-Kuo
貢獻者 政大哲學系
關鍵詞 TU Weiming;MOU Zongsan; Heidegger; Religiosity; Confucianism
日期 2008-07
上傳時間 13-Aug-2012 09:46:26 (UTC+8)
摘要 This article argues that, as far as the problem of Confucian religiosity is concerned, there is an interpretative turn fromMOU Zongsan’s moral metaphysics to TU Weiming’s religious hermeneutics. Some concluding remarks are made: First, Tu’s hermeneutics is rooted in the ontology of self as interrelatedness, which is completely different from Mou’s theory of true self as transcendental subjectivity. Second, Tu’s hermeneutics of self can be better illuminated with the help of Heidegger’s notion of Dasein as Being-with (Mitsein). For Tu and Heidegger, self cannot be seen as something separate from community. This article also points out that the paradigmatic shift is evidenced in another similarity between the four categories of self, community, nature, and the transcendent in Tu’s hermeneutics on the one hand, and the four symbols of earth, sky, divinities, and mortals employed by Heidegger to interpret the meaning of dwelling, on the other. In such a primordial situation of dwelling, gods are not supposed to be intellectually known; they are rather to be neighbors in community.
關聯 Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 7, 381-392
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 政大哲學系en
dc.creator (作者) 林鎮國zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lin, Chen-Kuoen
dc.date (日期) 2008-07-
dc.date.accessioned 13-Aug-2012 09:46:26 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 13-Aug-2012 09:46:26 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 13-Aug-2012 09:46:26 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/53337-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This article argues that, as far as the problem of Confucian religiosity is concerned, there is an interpretative turn fromMOU Zongsan’s moral metaphysics to TU Weiming’s religious hermeneutics. Some concluding remarks are made: First, Tu’s hermeneutics is rooted in the ontology of self as interrelatedness, which is completely different from Mou’s theory of true self as transcendental subjectivity. Second, Tu’s hermeneutics of self can be better illuminated with the help of Heidegger’s notion of Dasein as Being-with (Mitsein). For Tu and Heidegger, self cannot be seen as something separate from community. This article also points out that the paradigmatic shift is evidenced in another similarity between the four categories of self, community, nature, and the transcendent in Tu’s hermeneutics on the one hand, and the four symbols of earth, sky, divinities, and mortals employed by Heidegger to interpret the meaning of dwelling, on the other. In such a primordial situation of dwelling, gods are not supposed to be intellectually known; they are rather to be neighbors in community.en
dc.format.extent 241643 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language zh_TWen
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 7, 381-392en
dc.subject (關鍵詞) TU Weiming;MOU Zongsan; Heidegger; Religiosity; Confucianismen
dc.title (題名) Dwelling in the Nearness of Gods: A Hermeneutic Turn from Mou Zongsan to Tu Weimingen
dc.type (資料類型) articleen