1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 商學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 應徵者自我監控特質與國籍對應徵者防禦型印象管理戰術之影響
The effects of self-monitoring and nationality differences of applicants on choosing defensive impression management tactics
作者 鄭嘉瑩
Cheng, Chia Ying
貢獻者 蔡維奇<br>吳祉芸
鄭嘉瑩
Cheng, Chia Ying
關鍵詞 防禦型印象管理
自我監控
國籍
Defensive impression management
self-monitoring
nationality
日期 2011
上傳時間 30-十月-2012 11:18:30 (UTC+8)
摘要 過去在防禦型印象管理策略前因的探討相當缺乏，應徵者端的前因文獻存在缺口，故本研究欲探討防禦型印象管理的三種策略：「道歉」、「開脫」與「合理化」策略的選擇因素包含應徵者的自我監控特質與國籍差異，並將五大人格特質納為本研究的控制變項。本研究採問卷法，透過紙本與網路兩種收集管道，總共收集了台灣與非台灣(歐洲)兩地共171份有效樣本，其中台灣為102份，非台灣(歐洲)則為69份。
本研究結果指出，應徵者在進行防禦型印象管理戰術選擇時會因國籍的不同而有差異，特別是對於「道歉」與「開脫」策略的影響，台灣樣本傾向使用前者，而歐洲樣本則傾向使用後者，然而「合理化」策略並未有差異；至於自我監控特質則僅影響「合理化」策略的使用，對「道歉」與「開脫」策略的使用並無影響。本研究結果同時提供面試官與應徵者如何解讀防禦型印象管理戰術；對企業而言，面試官並無法完全藉由應徵者使用的防禦型印象管理戰術推測其自我監控特質；對應徵者而言，合理化策略在研究結果中為一保守且安全的策略使用。
In the past, there are lacks of researches studied about the antecedent of defensive impression management tactics. Especially the antecedents of applicants’ side are still unknown, and that is the purpose of this research. This research plans to explore the effects of applicants’ self-monitoring and nationality differences on the choices of applicants’ defensive impression management tactic.
Paper and online questionnaire methods were conducted. 171 samples were been collected which were from Taiwan and non-Taiwan (Europe). There were 102 samples from Taiwan area and 69 samples were from non-Taiwan area which is Europe area.
The results show that the nationality differences affect applicants’ choices of defensive management tactics, especially apology and excuse tactics. Samples from Taiwan area tend to choose apology tactic. However, samples from non-Taiwan (Europe) area prefer to choose excuse tactic in the same situation. And self-monitoring only affects justification tactic. These results can provide the guidance for both interviewers and applicants. For interviewers, it’s not suitable to infer applicant’s self-monitoring by the tactic he/she chose. And for applicants, justification tactic could be a safe option in such situation.
參考文獻 一、 中文部分
1. 俞如，不怕你來問，就怕你不問，就業情報雜誌295期。取自就業情報網，
網址：http://media.career.com.tw/Careerbook/magshort.asp?CA_NO=295p016
2. 李佩芬，尖銳面試問題 如何回答才得體？就業情報雜誌336期。取自就業情
報網，網址：http://media.career.com.tw/treasury/treasury_main.asp?no=336p09
0&no2=53
3. 林能白、邱宏昌(1999)，服務品質之研究─服務人員人格特質之影響分析與應
用，管理學報，16(2)，175-200。
4. 黃靖雅(2003)，職業傾向與五大人格特質量表之甄選效度驗證與比較─以某電子
公司為例，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
5. 楊育豪(2011)，面試官特質對於應徵者防禦型印象管理策略選擇之影響，東海
大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。
6. 吳明隆(2006)，SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計，台北：知城數
位科技。
7. 吳祉芸(2008)，甄選面談中應徵者防禦型印象管理策略及效果之研究，國立政
治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
8. 王石番(1989)，傳播內容分析法，台北：幼獅。
二、英文部分
1. Anderson, L.R. (1990). Toward a two-track model of leadership training:
Suggestions from self-monitoring theory. Small Group Research, 21, 147-167.
2. Ashford, S.J., & Northcraft, G.B. (1992). Conveying more or less than we realize:
The role of impression-management in feedback seeking. Organizational Behavior
and Human Decision Processes, 53, 310-334.
3. Bozeman, D.P., & Kacmar, K.M. (1997). Cybernetic model of impression
management processes in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 69, 9-30.
4. Braaten, D.O., Cody, M.J., & DeTienne, K.B. (1993). Account episodes in
organizations: Remedial work and impression management. Management
Communication Quarterly, 6, 219-250.
5. Briggs, S.R., & Cheek, J.M. (1980). On the nature of self-monitoring: Problems with
assessment, problems with validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
38, 678-686.
6. Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Caldwell, D.F., & O’Reilly, C.A. (1982). Responses to failure: The effect of choice and
responsibility on impression management. Academy of Management Journal, 25,
121-136.
8. Cuieford, J.P. (1965). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education (4th ED.).
NY: McGraw-Hill.
9. Cupach, W.R., Metts, S., & Hazelton, Jr., V. (1986). Coping with embarrassing
predicaments: Remedial strategies and their perceived utility. Journal of Language
and Social Psychology, 5, 181-200.
10. Dipboye, R.L. (1992). Selection interviews: Process perspectives. Cincinnati, OH:
South-Western.
11. Ellis, A.P.J., West, B.J., Ryan, A.M., & DeShon, R.P. (2002). The use of impression
management tactics in structured interviews: A function of question type? Journal
of Applied Psychology, 87, 1200-1208.
12. Fandt, P.M., & Ferris, G.R. (1990). The management of information and
impressions: When employees behave opportunistically. Organizational Behavior
and Human Decision Processes, 45, 140-158.
13. Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd Ed.) NY: McGraw-Hill.
Forgas, J.P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The Affect infusion model (AIM).
14. Fukumo, M., & Ohbuchi, K. (1998). How effective are different accounts of harm-
doing in softening victims’ reactions? A scenario investigation of the effects of
severity, relationship, and culture. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 167-178.
15. Gabrenya, W.K., & Arkin, R.M. (1980). Factor structure and factor correlates of the
self- monitoring scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 13-22.
16. Gardner, W.L. & Martinko, M.J. (1988). Impression Management in Organizations.
Journal of Management, 14(2), 321-338.
17. Giacalone, R.A., & Rosenfeld, P. (Ed.) (1989). Impression management in
organization. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Giacalone, R.A., & Rosenfeld, P. (Eds) (1991). Applied impression management:
How image-making affects managerial decisions. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage
Publications.
19. Goei, R., Roberto, A., Mayer, G., & Carlyle, K. (2007). The effects of favor and
apology on compliance. Communication Research, 34, 575-595.
20. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY:
Doubleday Anchor.
21. Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. NY: Harper & Row.
22. Gonzales, M.H. (1992) A thousand pardons: The effectiveness of verbal remedial
tactics during account episodes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11,
133-151.
23. Gonzales, M.H., Pederson, J.H., Manning, D.J., & Wetter, D.W. (1990). Pardon my
gaffe: Effects of sex, status, and consequence severity on accounts. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 610-621.
24. Gordon, R.A., Rozelle, R.M., & Baxter, J.C. (1988). The effect of applicant age,
job level, and accountability on the evaluation of job applicants. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 20-33.
25. Hitt, M.A., & Barr, S.H. (1989). Managerial selection decision models: Examination
of configural cue processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 53-61.
26. Hofstede, G. (1990). Managerial Culture and work-related values in India.
Organization Studies, 11, 106-106.
27. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. NY: Holt.
28. Johnson, J.A. (n.d.) (2008). IPIP-NEO narrative report, available at:
www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/5/j5j/IPIP
29. Jones, E.E., & Pittman, T.S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-
presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self(Vol. 1). Hillsdale,
N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 231-262.
30. Jones, E.E., & Wortman, C.B. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach.
Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press.
31. Judge, T.A. &Bretz, R.D. (1994). Political influence behavior and career sucess.
Journal of Management, 20, 43-65.
32. Kilduff, M., & Day, D.D. (1994). Do chameleons get ahead? The effect of self-
monitoring on managerial careers. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4),
1047-1060.
33. Kroeber, A.L., & Klunkhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and
definitions. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
34. Leary, M.R., & Kowalski, R.M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review
and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107: 34-47.
35. McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of
personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 52(1), 81-90.
36. McCullough, M.E., Worthington, E.L., & Rachal, K.C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving
in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Psychology, 73, 321-336.
37. McLaughlin, M.L., Cody, M.J., & Rosenstein, N.E. (1983). Account sequences in
conversation between strangers. Communication Monographs, 50, 102-125.
38. Migliore, L.A. (2011). Relation between big five personality traits and Hofstede’s
cultural dimensions. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 18(1),
38-54.
39. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M., & Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: Its
role in mediating appraisal and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 56, 219-227.
41. Pandey, J. (1986). Sociological perspectives on ingratiation. Progress in
Experimental Personality Research, 14, 205-29.
42. Peeters, H., & Lievens, F. (2006). Verbal and Nonverbal Impression Management
Tactics in Behavior Description and Situational Interviews. International Journal of
Selection and Assessment, 14, 206-222.
43. Pulakos, E.D., & Schmitt, N. (1995). Experience-based and situational interview
questions: Studies of validity. Personnel Psychology, 48, 289-308.
44. Robbins, S.P. (1994). Essentials of Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall, Inc.
45. Roberts, L.M. (2005). Changing faces: Professional image construction in diverse
organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 30, 685-711.
46. Rosenfeld, P., Giacalone, R.A., & Riordan, C.A. (1994). Impression management
theory and diversity: Lessons for organizational behavior. American Behavioral
Scientist, 37, 601-604.
47. Rosenfeld, P., Giacalone, R.A., & Riordan, C.A. (1995). Impression management in
Organizations: Theory, measurement, practice. NY: Routledge.
48. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants
of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379-399.
49. Schlenker, B.R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity,
and interpersonal relations. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.
50. Schlenker, B.R., & Darby, B.W. (1981). The use of apologies in social predicaments.
Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 271-278.
51. Schneider, D.J. (1981). Tactical self-presentations: Toward a broader conception.
In J.T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management theory and social psychological
research (pp.23-40) NY: Academic Press.
52. Schonbach, P. (1990). Account episodes: The management or escalation of conflict.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53. Schonbach, P., & Kleibaumhuter, P. (1990). Severity of reproach and defensiveness
of accounts. In M.J. Cody & M.L. McLaughlin (Eds), The Psychology of tactical
communication. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd, 229-243.
54. Scott, M.B., & Lyman, S.M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33,
46-62.
55. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
56. Snyder, M., & Gangstad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of
assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51,
125-139.
57. Stevens, C.K., & Kristof, A.L. (1995). Making the right impression: A field study of
applicant impression management during job interviews. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 80, 587-606.
58. Takaku, S. (2000). Culture and status as influences on account giving: A comparison
between the United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30,
371-383.
59. TaTa, J. (2002). The influence of accounts on perceived social loafing in work teams.
The International Journal of Conflict Management, 13. 292-308.
60. Tedeschi, J. T., Schlenker, B. R., Bonoma, T. V. (1971). Cognitive dissonance: Private
ratiocination or public spectacle? American Psychologist, 26, 685-695.
61. Tedeschi, J.T., & Melburg, B. (1984). Impression management and influence in the
organization. In S.B. Bacharach & E.J. Lawler (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of
Organizations, 3, 31-58. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
62. Tedeschi, J.T., & Reiss, M. (1981). Verbal strategies in impression management. In
C. Antaki (Ed.), The psychology of ordinary explanations of social behavior
(pp.271-309), London: Academic Press.
63. Tsai, W.C., Chen, C.C., & Chiu, S.F. (2005). Exploring boundaries of the effects of
applicant impression management tactics in job interviews. Journal of Management,
31, 108-132.
64. Tsai, W.C., Huang, T.C., Wu, C.Y., & Lo, I.H. (2010). Disentangling the effects of
applicant defensive impression management tactics in job interviews. International
Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(2), 131-140.
65. Turnley, W.H., & Bolino, M.C. (2001). Achieving desired images while avoiding
undesired images: Exploring the role of self-monitoring in impression management.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 351-360.
66. Van Iddekinge, C.H., McFarland, L.A., & Raymark,P.H. (2007). Antecedents of
impression management use and effectiveness in a structured interview. Journal of
Management, 33, 752-773.
67. Wayne, S.J. and Ferris, G.R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in
supervisor-subordinate interactions: a laboratory experiment and field study.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 487-99.
68. Wayne, S.J. and Green, S.A. (1993). The effects of leader-member exchange on
employee citizenship and impression management behavior. Human Relations, 46,
1431-1440.
69. Wayne, S.J., & Liden, R.C. (1995). Effects of impression management on
performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38,
232-260.
70. Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Newbury
Park, CA: Sage Publications.
71. Williams, R. (1993). Culture is ordinary. In A. Gray & J. McGuigan(Ed.), Studying
culture: An introductory reader (pp.5-14). London: Edward Arnold.
72. Zaccaro, S.J., Foti, R.J., & Kenny, D.A. (1991). Self-monitoring and trait based
variance in leadership: Situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 308-315.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所
99355048
100
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099355048
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蔡維奇<br>吳祉芸zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 鄭嘉瑩zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Cheng, Chia Yingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 鄭嘉瑩zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Cheng, Chia Yingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned 30-十月-2012 11:18:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 30-十月-2012 11:18:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 30-十月-2012 11:18:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0099355048en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54528-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 企業管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99355048zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 100zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 過去在防禦型印象管理策略前因的探討相當缺乏，應徵者端的前因文獻存在缺口，故本研究欲探討防禦型印象管理的三種策略：「道歉」、「開脫」與「合理化」策略的選擇因素包含應徵者的自我監控特質與國籍差異，並將五大人格特質納為本研究的控制變項。本研究採問卷法，透過紙本與網路兩種收集管道，總共收集了台灣與非台灣(歐洲)兩地共171份有效樣本，其中台灣為102份，非台灣(歐洲)則為69份。
本研究結果指出，應徵者在進行防禦型印象管理戰術選擇時會因國籍的不同而有差異，特別是對於「道歉」與「開脫」策略的影響，台灣樣本傾向使用前者，而歐洲樣本則傾向使用後者，然而「合理化」策略並未有差異；至於自我監控特質則僅影響「合理化」策略的使用，對「道歉」與「開脫」策略的使用並無影響。本研究結果同時提供面試官與應徵者如何解讀防禦型印象管理戰術；對企業而言，面試官並無法完全藉由應徵者使用的防禦型印象管理戰術推測其自我監控特質；對應徵者而言，合理化策略在研究結果中為一保守且安全的策略使用。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In the past, there are lacks of researches studied about the antecedent of defensive impression management tactics. Especially the antecedents of applicants’ side are still unknown, and that is the purpose of this research. This research plans to explore the effects of applicants’ self-monitoring and nationality differences on the choices of applicants’ defensive impression management tactic.
Paper and online questionnaire methods were conducted. 171 samples were been collected which were from Taiwan and non-Taiwan (Europe). There were 102 samples from Taiwan area and 69 samples were from non-Taiwan area which is Europe area.
The results show that the nationality differences affect applicants’ choices of defensive management tactics, especially apology and excuse tactics. Samples from Taiwan area tend to choose apology tactic. However, samples from non-Taiwan (Europe) area prefer to choose excuse tactic in the same situation. And self-monitoring only affects justification tactic. These results can provide the guidance for both interviewers and applicants. For interviewers, it’s not suitable to infer applicant’s self-monitoring by the tactic he/she chose. And for applicants, justification tactic could be a safe option in such situation.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 謝誌 I
中文摘要 II
英文摘要 III
【章節目錄】 IV
【圖目錄】 V
【表目錄】 V
第一章 研究動機與目的 1
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節印象管理戰術 3
一、印象管理戰術的定義與分類 3
二、防禦型印象管理戰術的分類 7
第二節自我監控 11
一、自我監控的定義 11
二、自我監控與印象管理戰術的關係 13
第三節自我監控對防禦型印象管理戰術之影響 15
第四節國籍 16
第三章 研究方法 19
第一節 研究架構 19
第二節 研究對象與流程 20
第三節 研究假設 25
第四節 研究變項與衡量工具 26
一、自變項─自我監控特質 26
二、自變項─國籍 28
三、依變項─防禦型印象管理戰術 28
四、控制變項─五大人格特質 31
五、控制變項─人口統計變項 34
第五節 統計方法分析 35
第四章 研究結果與分析 36
第一節 敘述統計 36
第二節 相關係數分析 37
第三節 階層迴歸分析 39
第四節 補充分析 44
第五節 假說檢定與驗證總表 45
第五章 結論與建議 47
第一節 研究結論 47
第二節 理論與管理意涵 49
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 52
【參考文獻】 53
【附錄一】問卷英文版 62
【附錄二】問卷中文版 65

【圖目錄】
圖3-1-1研究架構 19
【表目錄】
表 3-2-1 性別分析 21
表 3-2-2 年齡分析 21
表 3-2-3 學歷背景分析 22
表 3-2-4 面談活動之相關訓練分析 22
表 3-2-5 未來一年工作動態分析 23
表 3-2-6 歐洲樣本中的國家分布比例與個人主義之分數 23
表 3-2-7 整體樣本之防禦型印象管理策略之使用比例 24
表 3-2-8 五大人格特質之平均數與標準差 24
表 3-4-1 前測使用之自我監控特質量表 27
表 3-4-2 前測後修改之自我監控特質量表 27
表 3-4-2 前測後修改之自我監控特質量表(續) 28
表 3-4-3 防禦型印象管理戰術選擇之情境題 29
表 3-4-4 情境題之雙向對譯內容 29
表 3-4-5 防禦型印象管理戰術使用之範例 30
表 3-4-6 編碼者信度計算公式 31
表 3-4-7 Saucier’s Mini-Maker 32
表 3-4-7 Saucier’s Mini-Maker(續) 33
表 3-4-8 五大人格特質量表之信度 34
表 4-1-1 不同國籍樣本的防禦型印象管理戰術使用情況 36
表 4-2-1 相關係數分析 38
表 4-3-1 道歉策略之階層迴歸分析 40
表 4-3-2 道歉策略與國籍之交叉列聯表 40
表 4-3-3 開脫策略之階層迴歸分析 41
表 4-3-4 開脫策略與國籍之交叉列聯表 42
表 4-3-5 合理化策略之階層迴歸分析 43
表 4-3-6 合理化策略與自我監控特質之交叉列聯表 43
表 4-4-1 合理化策略與性別之交叉列聯表 44
表 4-5-1 本研究假設與實證結果 46		zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099355048en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 防禦型印象管理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 自我監控zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國籍zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Defensive impression managementen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) self-monitoringen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) nationalityen_US
dc.title (題名) 應徵者自我監控特質與國籍對應徵者防禦型印象管理戰術之影響zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The effects of self-monitoring and nationality differences of applicants on choosing defensive impression management tacticsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、 中文部分
1. 俞如，不怕你來問，就怕你不問，就業情報雜誌295期。取自就業情報網，
網址：http://media.career.com.tw/Careerbook/magshort.asp?CA_NO=295p016
2. 李佩芬，尖銳面試問題 如何回答才得體？就業情報雜誌336期。取自就業情
報網，網址：http://media.career.com.tw/treasury/treasury_main.asp?no=336p09
0&no2=53
3. 林能白、邱宏昌(1999)，服務品質之研究─服務人員人格特質之影響分析與應
用，管理學報，16(2)，175-200。
4. 黃靖雅(2003)，職業傾向與五大人格特質量表之甄選效度驗證與比較─以某電子
公司為例，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
5. 楊育豪(2011)，面試官特質對於應徵者防禦型印象管理策略選擇之影響，東海
大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文。
6. 吳明隆(2006)，SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計，台北：知城數
位科技。
7. 吳祉芸(2008)，甄選面談中應徵者防禦型印象管理策略及效果之研究，國立政
治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
8. 王石番(1989)，傳播內容分析法，台北：幼獅。
二、英文部分
1. Anderson, L.R. (1990). Toward a two-track model of leadership training:
Suggestions from self-monitoring theory. Small Group Research, 21, 147-167.
2. Ashford, S.J., & Northcraft, G.B. (1992). Conveying more or less than we realize:
The role of impression-management in feedback seeking. Organizational Behavior
and Human Decision Processes, 53, 310-334.
3. Bozeman, D.P., & Kacmar, K.M. (1997). Cybernetic model of impression
management processes in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, 69, 9-30.
4. Braaten, D.O., Cody, M.J., & DeTienne, K.B. (1993). Account episodes in
organizations: Remedial work and impression management. Management
Communication Quarterly, 6, 219-250.
5. Briggs, S.R., & Cheek, J.M. (1980). On the nature of self-monitoring: Problems with
assessment, problems with validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
38, 678-686.
6. Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Caldwell, D.F., & O’Reilly, C.A. (1982). Responses to failure: The effect of choice and
responsibility on impression management. Academy of Management Journal, 25,
121-136.
8. Cuieford, J.P. (1965). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education (4th ED.).
NY: McGraw-Hill.
9. Cupach, W.R., Metts, S., & Hazelton, Jr., V. (1986). Coping with embarrassing
predicaments: Remedial strategies and their perceived utility. Journal of Language
and Social Psychology, 5, 181-200.
10. Dipboye, R.L. (1992). Selection interviews: Process perspectives. Cincinnati, OH:
South-Western.
11. Ellis, A.P.J., West, B.J., Ryan, A.M., & DeShon, R.P. (2002). The use of impression
management tactics in structured interviews: A function of question type? Journal
of Applied Psychology, 87, 1200-1208.
12. Fandt, P.M., & Ferris, G.R. (1990). The management of information and
impressions: When employees behave opportunistically. Organizational Behavior
and Human Decision Processes, 45, 140-158.
13. Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd Ed.) NY: McGraw-Hill.
Forgas, J.P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The Affect infusion model (AIM).
14. Fukumo, M., & Ohbuchi, K. (1998). How effective are different accounts of harm-
doing in softening victims’ reactions? A scenario investigation of the effects of
severity, relationship, and culture. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 167-178.
15. Gabrenya, W.K., & Arkin, R.M. (1980). Factor structure and factor correlates of the
self- monitoring scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 13-22.
16. Gardner, W.L. & Martinko, M.J. (1988). Impression Management in Organizations.
Journal of Management, 14(2), 321-338.
17. Giacalone, R.A., & Rosenfeld, P. (Ed.) (1989). Impression management in
organization. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Giacalone, R.A., & Rosenfeld, P. (Eds) (1991). Applied impression management:
How image-making affects managerial decisions. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage
Publications.
19. Goei, R., Roberto, A., Mayer, G., & Carlyle, K. (2007). The effects of favor and
apology on compliance. Communication Research, 34, 575-595.
20. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY:
Doubleday Anchor.
21. Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. NY: Harper & Row.
22. Gonzales, M.H. (1992) A thousand pardons: The effectiveness of verbal remedial
tactics during account episodes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11,
133-151.
23. Gonzales, M.H., Pederson, J.H., Manning, D.J., & Wetter, D.W. (1990). Pardon my
gaffe: Effects of sex, status, and consequence severity on accounts. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 610-621.
24. Gordon, R.A., Rozelle, R.M., & Baxter, J.C. (1988). The effect of applicant age,
job level, and accountability on the evaluation of job applicants. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 20-33.
25. Hitt, M.A., & Barr, S.H. (1989). Managerial selection decision models: Examination
of configural cue processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 53-61.
26. Hofstede, G. (1990). Managerial Culture and work-related values in India.
Organization Studies, 11, 106-106.
27. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. NY: Holt.
28. Johnson, J.A. (n.d.) (2008). IPIP-NEO narrative report, available at:
www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/5/j5j/IPIP
29. Jones, E.E., & Pittman, T.S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-
presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self(Vol. 1). Hillsdale,
N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 231-262.
30. Jones, E.E., & Wortman, C.B. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach.
Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press.
31. Judge, T.A. &Bretz, R.D. (1994). Political influence behavior and career sucess.
Journal of Management, 20, 43-65.
32. Kilduff, M., & Day, D.D. (1994). Do chameleons get ahead? The effect of self-
monitoring on managerial careers. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4),
1047-1060.
33. Kroeber, A.L., & Klunkhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and
definitions. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
34. Leary, M.R., & Kowalski, R.M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review
and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107: 34-47.
35. McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of
personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 52(1), 81-90.
36. McCullough, M.E., Worthington, E.L., & Rachal, K.C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving
in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Psychology, 73, 321-336.
37. McLaughlin, M.L., Cody, M.J., & Rosenstein, N.E. (1983). Account sequences in
conversation between strangers. Communication Monographs, 50, 102-125.
38. Migliore, L.A. (2011). Relation between big five personality traits and Hofstede’s
cultural dimensions. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 18(1),
38-54.
39. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M., & Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: Its
role in mediating appraisal and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 56, 219-227.
41. Pandey, J. (1986). Sociological perspectives on ingratiation. Progress in
Experimental Personality Research, 14, 205-29.
42. Peeters, H., & Lievens, F. (2006). Verbal and Nonverbal Impression Management
Tactics in Behavior Description and Situational Interviews. International Journal of
Selection and Assessment, 14, 206-222.
43. Pulakos, E.D., & Schmitt, N. (1995). Experience-based and situational interview
questions: Studies of validity. Personnel Psychology, 48, 289-308.
44. Robbins, S.P. (1994). Essentials of Organizational Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall, Inc.
45. Roberts, L.M. (2005). Changing faces: Professional image construction in diverse
organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 30, 685-711.
46. Rosenfeld, P., Giacalone, R.A., & Riordan, C.A. (1994). Impression management
theory and diversity: Lessons for organizational behavior. American Behavioral
Scientist, 37, 601-604.
47. Rosenfeld, P., Giacalone, R.A., & Riordan, C.A. (1995). Impression management in
Organizations: Theory, measurement, practice. NY: Routledge.
48. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants
of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379-399.
49. Schlenker, B.R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity,
and interpersonal relations. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.
50. Schlenker, B.R., & Darby, B.W. (1981). The use of apologies in social predicaments.
Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 271-278.
51. Schneider, D.J. (1981). Tactical self-presentations: Toward a broader conception.
In J.T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management theory and social psychological
research (pp.23-40) NY: Academic Press.
52. Schonbach, P. (1990). Account episodes: The management or escalation of conflict.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53. Schonbach, P., & Kleibaumhuter, P. (1990). Severity of reproach and defensiveness
of accounts. In M.J. Cody & M.L. McLaughlin (Eds), The Psychology of tactical
communication. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd, 229-243.
54. Scott, M.B., & Lyman, S.M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33,
46-62.
55. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
56. Snyder, M., & Gangstad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of
assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51,
125-139.
57. Stevens, C.K., & Kristof, A.L. (1995). Making the right impression: A field study of
applicant impression management during job interviews. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 80, 587-606.
58. Takaku, S. (2000). Culture and status as influences on account giving: A comparison
between the United States and Japan. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30,
371-383.
59. TaTa, J. (2002). The influence of accounts on perceived social loafing in work teams.
The International Journal of Conflict Management, 13. 292-308.
60. Tedeschi, J. T., Schlenker, B. R., Bonoma, T. V. (1971). Cognitive dissonance: Private
ratiocination or public spectacle? American Psychologist, 26, 685-695.
61. Tedeschi, J.T., & Melburg, B. (1984). Impression management and influence in the
organization. In S.B. Bacharach & E.J. Lawler (Eds.), Research in the Sociology of
Organizations, 3, 31-58. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
62. Tedeschi, J.T., & Reiss, M. (1981). Verbal strategies in impression management. In
C. Antaki (Ed.), The psychology of ordinary explanations of social behavior
(pp.271-309), London: Academic Press.
63. Tsai, W.C., Chen, C.C., & Chiu, S.F. (2005). Exploring boundaries of the effects of
applicant impression management tactics in job interviews. Journal of Management,
31, 108-132.
64. Tsai, W.C., Huang, T.C., Wu, C.Y., & Lo, I.H. (2010). Disentangling the effects of
applicant defensive impression management tactics in job interviews. International
Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(2), 131-140.
65. Turnley, W.H., & Bolino, M.C. (2001). Achieving desired images while avoiding
undesired images: Exploring the role of self-monitoring in impression management.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 351-360.
66. Van Iddekinge, C.H., McFarland, L.A., & Raymark,P.H. (2007). Antecedents of
impression management use and effectiveness in a structured interview. Journal of
Management, 33, 752-773.
67. Wayne, S.J. and Ferris, G.R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in
supervisor-subordinate interactions: a laboratory experiment and field study.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 487-99.
68. Wayne, S.J. and Green, S.A. (1993). The effects of leader-member exchange on
employee citizenship and impression management behavior. Human Relations, 46,
1431-1440.
69. Wayne, S.J., & Liden, R.C. (1995). Effects of impression management on
performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38,
232-260.
70. Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Newbury
Park, CA: Sage Publications.
71. Williams, R. (1993). Culture is ordinary. In A. Gray & J. McGuigan(Ed.), Studying
culture: An introductory reader (pp.5-14). London: Edward Arnold.
72. Zaccaro, S.J., Foti, R.J., & Kenny, D.A. (1991). Self-monitoring and trait based
variance in leadership: Situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 308-315.		zh_TW