1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 知識創新學習環境量表之編製
The development of the knowledge building environment scale
作者 林奎宇
Lin, Kuei Yu
貢獻者 洪煌堯
Hong, Huang Yao
林奎宇
Lin, Kuei Yu
關鍵詞 知識創新
學習環境
競爭模式
複核效化
knowledge building
learning environment
competing models
cross-validation
日期 2011
上傳時間 30-Oct-2012 11:33:19 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究旨在編製「知識創新學習環境量表」，以瞭解學習環境中知識創新氛圍的程度。透過三個獨立樣本A、B及C，分別進行探索性因素分析、驗證性因素分析及複核效化分析。樣本A（332人）以探索性因素分析獲得因素成份，結果顯示此份量表有三個因素，分別命名為「想法因素」、「自主學習者因素」及「社群因素」。其次，透過建立本量表的一系列競爭模式，以樣本B（536人）進行驗證性因素分析之評鑑，結果顯示二階單因素模式為最簡效模式，並且量表具有良好之信、效度。而樣本C（536人）則作為複核效化之分析，結果顯示二階單因素模式具有穩定性與預測力。希冀本量表能提供相關單位做為教學及研究之應用。
The purpose of this study was to develop the Knowledge Building Environment Scale (KBES). Three independent samples was used to validte the reliability and validity of the scale. Firstly, sample A (n=332) was used to generate the factors through exploratory factor analysis. It resulted in a scale of three factors which contains ‘idea’ factor, ‘agent’ factor and ‘community’ factor. Secondly, a series of competing models was established and evaluated by confirmatory factor analysis through sample B (n=536). Comparing with several competing models, hierarchical model was found to be the most efficient model with good reliability and validity. Finally, the cross-validation was tested by sample C (n=536) for hierarchical model to confirm the stability and predictive power of this model. The KBES can provide relevant institutions as a tool for evaluating learning environments.
參考文獻 王博賢（2010）。知識翻新教學對小學生科學探究活動與科學合作概念之影響。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
余民寧（2006）。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS 的應用。臺北市：高等教育。
余民寧、李仁豪（2008）。調查方式與議題熟悉度對問卷回收率與內容的影響。教育學刊，30，101-140。
吳佳蓉（2010）。學習社群在電腦支援合作學習環境中的知識共構—以自然科學史為例。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
李仁豪、余民寧（2010）。網路與紙本調查方式、網路問卷長短、網路問卷議題熟悉度高低的DIF分析及潛在平均數差異。教育與心理研究，33（2），111-139。
林生傳（1988）。新教學理論與策略。臺北市：五南。
邱皓政（2011）。結構方程式模式—LISREL/SIMPLIS原理與應用 (第二版)。臺北市：雙葉。
侯駿廉（2007）。國小學童學習態度、頓悟思考能力及其對教師教學風格感知之研究。臺北市立教育大學創造思考暨資賦優異教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
張宇慧（2010）。以想法為中心的知識翻新學習對團隊創造力之影響。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
張景媛（1988）。教學類型與學習類型適配性研究暨學生學習適應理論模式的驗證。國立台灣師範大學心理輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳木金（2009）。認知風格理論對有效學習策略的啟示。國立政治大學教學發展中心電子報。取自 http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38177
游森期、余民寧（2006）。網路問卷與傳統問卷之比較：多樣本均等性方法學之應用。測驗學刊，53（1），103-128。
黃芳銘（2007）。結構方程模式—理論與應用。臺北市：五南。
楊曼歆（2010）。金門縣國小學童知覺教師教學風格、班級創意氛圍及其與創造力之關係。國立臺北教育大學教育學系學位論文，未出版，台北市。
Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
APEC (2000). Towards knowledge-based economies in APEC. Singapore: APEC Secretariat.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural squation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.
Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1993). EQS/windows user’s guide. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software Incorporated.
Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper`s world 3. Educational researcher, 23(7), 21–23.
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unraveling basic components and dimensions (pp. 55–68). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.
Brophy-Herb, H. E., Lee, R. E., Nievar, M. A., & Stollak, G. (2007). Preschoolers` social competence: Relations to family characteristics, teacher behaviors and classroom climate. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(2), 134-148.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Chai, C. S., & Khine, M. S. (2006). An analysis of interaction and participation patterns in online community. Education Technology and Society, 9(1), 250–261.
Chan, C. K. K. (2011). Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 1–40.
Chan, C. K. K., & Chan, Y. (2011). Students’ views of collaboration and online participation in Knowledge Forum.Computers and Education, 57(2), 1445–1457.
Charles, E. S., & Shumar, W. (2007). Creativity, collaboration and competence: Agency in online synchronous chat environment. Proceedings of the 8th iternational conference on computer supported collaborative learning. New Brunswick, NJ: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Conti, G. J. (1978). Principles of adult learning scale: An instrument for measuring teacher behavior related to the collaborative teaching-learning mode. Ed.D. diss., Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw Judy A. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. London, England: Sage Publications.
Diaz, R. M., Neal, C. J., & Amaya-Williams, M. (1990). The social origins of self-regulation. In Moll, L. C. (ed.), Vygotsky and Education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology(pp. 127–154), New York: Cambridge University Press.
Drucker, P. (1969). The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. New York: Harper & Row.
Dunn, R. S.; Dunn, K. L. & Perrin, J. (1994). Teaching young children through their individual learning styles. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Dunn, R.S. & Dunn, K.J. (1979). Learning styles/teaching styles: should they...can they...be matched? Educational Leadership, 36, 238-244.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
Fischer, B. B. & Fischer, L. (1979). Styles in teaching and learning. Educational Leadership, 36, 245-254.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
Gilbert, N., & Driscoll, M. (2002). Collaborative knowledge building: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(1), 59–80.
Gorsuch, R. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Grasha, A. F., & Reichmann, M. (1975). Student learning styles. In W. H. Berquist and S. R. Phillips (eds.), A handbook for faculty development. Washington, DC: The council for the advancement of small colleges.
Gregorc, A. F. (1979). Learning/teaching styles: Their mature and effects. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Students learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 19-26). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Griselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P., & Zedeck, S. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences.San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6thed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
Hargreaves, D. H. (1999). The knowledge‐creating school. British journal of educational studies, 47(2), 122–144.
Hong, H.-Y., & Lin, S.-P. (2010). Teacher-education students` epistemological belief change through collaborative knowledge building. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 99–110.
Hong, H.-Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2009). Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation.Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 613–627.
Hong, H.-Y., Chen, F.-C., Chai, C.-S., & Chan, W.-J. (2010). Teacher-education students’ views about knowledge building theory and practice. Instructional Science,39(4), 467–482.
Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., & Zhang, J. (2010). Knowledge society network: Toward a dynamic, sustained network for building knowledge. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1), 1–29.
Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. L. (2008). Principle-based design to foster adaptiveuse of technology for building community knowledge.In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P. A. Kirschner, &F. J. Prins (Eds.), International perspectives in the learning sciences: Creaing a learning world. Proceedings of the 8th international conference for the learning sciences. Utrecht, the Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294−316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 user`s reference guide. Chicago: SPSS Publications.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language.Chicago: Scientific Software.
Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rded.). New York: Guilford Press.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Kraetzig, G. P. & Arbuthnott, K. D. (2006). Perceptual learning style and learning proficiency: a test of the hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 1, 238–246.
Lai, M., & Law, N. (2006). Peer scaffolding of knowledge building through collaborative groups with differential learning experiences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 123–144.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1999). Legitimate peripheral participation in the communities of practice. In McCormick, R. & Paechter, C. (Eds.), Learning and knowledge(pp. 21–35), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lee, C. (2010). Generating synergy between conceptual change and knowledge building.Human Development, 53, 134–152.
Leinonen, T., Virtanen, O., & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Collaborative discovering of key ideas in knowledge building. Proceedings of the computer support for collaborative learning 2002 conference, Boulder, CO.
Lin, K.-Y., Hong, H.-Y., & Chai, C.-S. (2011). “Exploring college students’perceptions of classroom learning in a knowledge building environment”. Proceedings of the 19th international conference of computer in education, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Lujan, H. L. & DiCarlo, S. E. (2006). First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Advances in Physiology Education, 30, 13–16.
MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., Mar, C. M., & Reith, J. V. (1994). Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 1–32.
Murphy, P. K. (2007). The eye of the beholder: The interplay of social and cognitive components in change. Educational Psychologist , 42, 41–53.
Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2008). The role of knowledge, beliefs, and interest in the conceptual change process: A synthesis and meta-analysis of the research. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 583–618). New York: Routledge.
Noar, S. M. (2003). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Role of Structural Equation Modeling, 10(4), 622–647.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
O’Neil, B.（2001）. Improving learning for underachievers. The Clearing House, 74(5), 236-237.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1996). The Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris, OECD.
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Epistemological foundations for CSCL: A comparison of three models of innovative knowledge communities. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 24–32). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.
Papert, S. (2000). What’s the big idea? Toward a pedagogy of idea power. IBM Systems Journal, 39(3.4), 720–729.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2009). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/documents/P21_Framework.pdf
Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. London, England: Oxford University Press.
Rowe, E. W., Kim, S., Baker, J. A., Kamphaus, R. W., & Horne, A. M. (2010). Student personal perception of classroom climate: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(5), 858-879.
Russell, A. (2002). The role of epistemic agency and knowledge building discourse to foster interprofessional practice in a Canadian hospital. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, IN. Retrieved from http://ikit.org/fulltext/2002AERAAnn.pdf
Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York: Basic Books.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge-building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,1(1), 37–68.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (pp. 1370–1373). New York: Macmillan Reference.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–119). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R. S., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), 51–68.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
Singh, G., Hawkins, L., & Whymark, G. (2007). An integral model of collaborative knowledge building. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 85–104.
Stahl, G. (2000). A model of collaborative knowledge-building. Proceedings of 4th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS 2000), Ann Arbor, MI.
Stump, G. S., Hilpert, J. C., Husman, J., Chung, W.-T., & Kim, W. (2011). Collaborative learning in engineering students: Gender and achievement. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 475-497.
Trilling, B., & Hood, P. (1999). Learning technology and education reform in the knowledge age or "We`re wired, webbed and windowed, now what?", Educational Technology, 39(3), 5-18.
Tu, C. (2004). Online collaborative learning communities: Twenty-one designs to building an online collaborative learning community. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
UNESCO. (2005). Towards knowledge societies. New York: UNESCO Publishing.
van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2007). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronics portfolios. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 175-220.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Wheatley, M. J. (2002). Finding our way. San Francisco: Berrett–Koehler.
Whitehead, A. N. (2011). Science and the modern world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R. & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64.
Wothke, W. (1993). Nonpositive definite matrices in structural modeling. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 256–293). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Yukawa, J. (2006). Co-reflection in online learning: Collaborative critical thinking as narrative. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 203–228.
Zapalska, A. M. & Dabb, H. (2002). Learning styles. Journal of Teaching International Business, 13, 77–97.
Zhang, J., & Sun. Y. (2011). Reading for idea advancement in a Grade 4 knowledge building community. Instructional Science, 39, 429–452.
Zhang, J., &Chan, C. K. K. (2008). Examining the growth of community knowledge in an online space. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE), Taipei, Taiwan.
Zhang, J., Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307.
Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44.
Zhou, N. (2009). Question co-construction in VMT chats. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying VirtualMath Teams. New York: Springer Press.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
99152002
100
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099152002
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 洪煌堯zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Hong, Huang Yaoen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林奎宇zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lin, Kuei Yuen_US
dc.creator (作者) 林奎宇zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lin, Kuei Yuen_US
dc.date (日期) 2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned 30-Oct-2012 11:33:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 30-Oct-2012 11:33:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 30-Oct-2012 11:33:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0099152002en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54721-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99152002zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 100zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在編製「知識創新學習環境量表」，以瞭解學習環境中知識創新氛圍的程度。透過三個獨立樣本A、B及C，分別進行探索性因素分析、驗證性因素分析及複核效化分析。樣本A（332人）以探索性因素分析獲得因素成份，結果顯示此份量表有三個因素，分別命名為「想法因素」、「自主學習者因素」及「社群因素」。其次，透過建立本量表的一系列競爭模式，以樣本B（536人）進行驗證性因素分析之評鑑，結果顯示二階單因素模式為最簡效模式，並且量表具有良好之信、效度。而樣本C（536人）則作為複核效化之分析，結果顯示二階單因素模式具有穩定性與預測力。希冀本量表能提供相關單位做為教學及研究之應用。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of this study was to develop the Knowledge Building Environment Scale (KBES). Three independent samples was used to validte the reliability and validity of the scale. Firstly, sample A (n=332) was used to generate the factors through exploratory factor analysis. It resulted in a scale of three factors which contains ‘idea’ factor, ‘agent’ factor and ‘community’ factor. Secondly, a series of competing models was established and evaluated by confirmatory factor analysis through sample B (n=536). Comparing with several competing models, hierarchical model was found to be the most efficient model with good reliability and validity. Finally, the cross-validation was tested by sample C (n=536) for hierarchical model to confirm the stability and predictive power of this model. The KBES can provide relevant institutions as a tool for evaluating learning environments.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 謝 誌 i
摘 要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的與待答問題 3
第三節 名詞釋義 4
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 知識創新 7
第二節 想法與知識創新 13
第三節 自主學習者與知識創新 16
第四節 社群與知識創新 20
第五節 想法、自主學習者及社群之相關研究 23
第三章 研究方法 27
第一節 研究設計架構與假設 27
第二節 研究對象 34
第三節 研究步驟 36
第四節 研究工具 38
第五節 資料處理 40
第四章 研究結果 46
第一節 探索性因素分析 46
第二節 驗證性因素分析 52
第三節 模式內在結構驗證 63
第四節 複核效化分析 67
第五節 背景變項分析 70
第五章 結論與建議 80
第一節 結論 80
第二節 建議 82
參考文獻 84
附 錄 94		zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099152002en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知識創新zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學習環境zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 競爭模式zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 複核效化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) knowledge buildingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) learning environmenten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) competing modelsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) cross-validationen_US
dc.title (題名) 知識創新學習環境量表之編製zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The development of the knowledge building environment scaleen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王博賢（2010）。知識翻新教學對小學生科學探究活動與科學合作概念之影響。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
余民寧（2006）。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS 的應用。臺北市：高等教育。
余民寧、李仁豪（2008）。調查方式與議題熟悉度對問卷回收率與內容的影響。教育學刊，30，101-140。
吳佳蓉（2010）。學習社群在電腦支援合作學習環境中的知識共構—以自然科學史為例。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
李仁豪、余民寧（2010）。網路與紙本調查方式、網路問卷長短、網路問卷議題熟悉度高低的DIF分析及潛在平均數差異。教育與心理研究，33（2），111-139。
林生傳（1988）。新教學理論與策略。臺北市：五南。
邱皓政（2011）。結構方程式模式—LISREL/SIMPLIS原理與應用 (第二版)。臺北市：雙葉。
侯駿廉（2007）。國小學童學習態度、頓悟思考能力及其對教師教學風格感知之研究。臺北市立教育大學創造思考暨資賦優異教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
張宇慧（2010）。以想法為中心的知識翻新學習對團隊創造力之影響。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
張景媛（1988）。教學類型與學習類型適配性研究暨學生學習適應理論模式的驗證。國立台灣師範大學心理輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳木金（2009）。認知風格理論對有效學習策略的啟示。國立政治大學教學發展中心電子報。取自 http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38177
游森期、余民寧（2006）。網路問卷與傳統問卷之比較：多樣本均等性方法學之應用。測驗學刊，53（1），103-128。
黃芳銘（2007）。結構方程模式—理論與應用。臺北市：五南。
楊曼歆（2010）。金門縣國小學童知覺教師教學風格、班級創意氛圍及其與創造力之關係。國立臺北教育大學教育學系學位論文，未出版，台北市。
Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
APEC (2000). Towards knowledge-based economies in APEC. Singapore: APEC Secretariat.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural squation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94.
Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1993). EQS/windows user’s guide. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software Incorporated.
Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper`s world 3. Educational researcher, 23(7), 21–23.
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unraveling basic components and dimensions (pp. 55–68). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.
Brophy-Herb, H. E., Lee, R. E., Nievar, M. A., & Stollak, G. (2007). Preschoolers` social competence: Relations to family characteristics, teacher behaviors and classroom climate. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(2), 134-148.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Chai, C. S., & Khine, M. S. (2006). An analysis of interaction and participation patterns in online community. Education Technology and Society, 9(1), 250–261.
Chan, C. K. K. (2011). Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 1–40.
Chan, C. K. K., & Chan, Y. (2011). Students’ views of collaboration and online participation in Knowledge Forum.Computers and Education, 57(2), 1445–1457.
Charles, E. S., & Shumar, W. (2007). Creativity, collaboration and competence: Agency in online synchronous chat environment. Proceedings of the 8th iternational conference on computer supported collaborative learning. New Brunswick, NJ: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Conti, G. J. (1978). Principles of adult learning scale: An instrument for measuring teacher behavior related to the collaborative teaching-learning mode. Ed.D. diss., Northern Illinois University, DeKalb.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw Judy A. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. London, England: Sage Publications.
Diaz, R. M., Neal, C. J., & Amaya-Williams, M. (1990). The social origins of self-regulation. In Moll, L. C. (ed.), Vygotsky and Education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology(pp. 127–154), New York: Cambridge University Press.
Drucker, P. (1969). The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. New York: Harper & Row.
Dunn, R. S.; Dunn, K. L. & Perrin, J. (1994). Teaching young children through their individual learning styles. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Dunn, R.S. & Dunn, K.J. (1979). Learning styles/teaching styles: should they...can they...be matched? Educational Leadership, 36, 238-244.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
Fischer, B. B. & Fischer, L. (1979). Styles in teaching and learning. Educational Leadership, 36, 245-254.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
Gilbert, N., & Driscoll, M. (2002). Collaborative knowledge building: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(1), 59–80.
Gorsuch, R. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Grasha, A. F., & Reichmann, M. (1975). Student learning styles. In W. H. Berquist and S. R. Phillips (eds.), A handbook for faculty development. Washington, DC: The council for the advancement of small colleges.
Gregorc, A. F. (1979). Learning/teaching styles: Their mature and effects. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Students learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 19-26). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Griselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P., & Zedeck, S. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences.San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6thed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
Hargreaves, D. H. (1999). The knowledge‐creating school. British journal of educational studies, 47(2), 122–144.
Hong, H.-Y., & Lin, S.-P. (2010). Teacher-education students` epistemological belief change through collaborative knowledge building. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 99–110.
Hong, H.-Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2009). Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation.Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 613–627.
Hong, H.-Y., Chen, F.-C., Chai, C.-S., & Chan, W.-J. (2010). Teacher-education students’ views about knowledge building theory and practice. Instructional Science,39(4), 467–482.
Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., & Zhang, J. (2010). Knowledge society network: Toward a dynamic, sustained network for building knowledge. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1), 1–29.
Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. L. (2008). Principle-based design to foster adaptiveuse of technology for building community knowledge.In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P. A. Kirschner, &F. J. Prins (Eds.), International perspectives in the learning sciences: Creaing a learning world. Proceedings of the 8th international conference for the learning sciences. Utrecht, the Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294−316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 user`s reference guide. Chicago: SPSS Publications.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language.Chicago: Scientific Software.
Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rded.). New York: Guilford Press.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Kraetzig, G. P. & Arbuthnott, K. D. (2006). Perceptual learning style and learning proficiency: a test of the hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 1, 238–246.
Lai, M., & Law, N. (2006). Peer scaffolding of knowledge building through collaborative groups with differential learning experiences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 123–144.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1999). Legitimate peripheral participation in the communities of practice. In McCormick, R. & Paechter, C. (Eds.), Learning and knowledge(pp. 21–35), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lee, C. (2010). Generating synergy between conceptual change and knowledge building.Human Development, 53, 134–152.
Leinonen, T., Virtanen, O., & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Collaborative discovering of key ideas in knowledge building. Proceedings of the computer support for collaborative learning 2002 conference, Boulder, CO.
Lin, K.-Y., Hong, H.-Y., & Chai, C.-S. (2011). “Exploring college students’perceptions of classroom learning in a knowledge building environment”. Proceedings of the 19th international conference of computer in education, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Lujan, H. L. & DiCarlo, S. E. (2006). First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles. Advances in Physiology Education, 30, 13–16.
MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., Mar, C. M., & Reith, J. V. (1994). Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 1–32.
Murphy, P. K. (2007). The eye of the beholder: The interplay of social and cognitive components in change. Educational Psychologist , 42, 41–53.
Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2008). The role of knowledge, beliefs, and interest in the conceptual change process: A synthesis and meta-analysis of the research. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 583–618). New York: Routledge.
Noar, S. M. (2003). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Role of Structural Equation Modeling, 10(4), 622–647.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.
O’Neil, B.（2001）. Improving learning for underachievers. The Clearing House, 74(5), 236-237.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1996). The Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris, OECD.
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Epistemological foundations for CSCL: A comparison of three models of innovative knowledge communities. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 24–32). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.
Papert, S. (2000). What’s the big idea? Toward a pedagogy of idea power. IBM Systems Journal, 39(3.4), 720–729.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2009). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/documents/P21_Framework.pdf
Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. London, England: Oxford University Press.
Rowe, E. W., Kim, S., Baker, J. A., Kamphaus, R. W., & Horne, A. M. (2010). Student personal perception of classroom climate: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(5), 858-879.
Russell, A. (2002). The role of epistemic agency and knowledge building discourse to foster interprofessional practice in a Canadian hospital. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, IN. Retrieved from http://ikit.org/fulltext/2002AERAAnn.pdf
Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York: Basic Books.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge-building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. The Journal of the Learning Sciences,1(1), 37–68.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (pp. 1370–1373). New York: Macmillan Reference.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–119). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., McLean, R. S., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), 51–68.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
Singh, G., Hawkins, L., & Whymark, G. (2007). An integral model of collaborative knowledge building. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 85–104.
Stahl, G. (2000). A model of collaborative knowledge-building. Proceedings of 4th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS 2000), Ann Arbor, MI.
Stump, G. S., Hilpert, J. C., Husman, J., Chung, W.-T., & Kim, W. (2011). Collaborative learning in engineering students: Gender and achievement. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 475-497.
Trilling, B., & Hood, P. (1999). Learning technology and education reform in the knowledge age or "We`re wired, webbed and windowed, now what?", Educational Technology, 39(3), 5-18.
Tu, C. (2004). Online collaborative learning communities: Twenty-one designs to building an online collaborative learning community. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
UNESCO. (2005). Towards knowledge societies. New York: UNESCO Publishing.
van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2007). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronics portfolios. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 175-220.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Wheatley, M. J. (2002). Finding our way. San Francisco: Berrett–Koehler.
Whitehead, A. N. (2011). Science and the modern world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R. & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64.
Wothke, W. (1993). Nonpositive definite matrices in structural modeling. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 256–293). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Yukawa, J. (2006). Co-reflection in online learning: Collaborative critical thinking as narrative. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 203–228.
Zapalska, A. M. & Dabb, H. (2002). Learning styles. Journal of Teaching International Business, 13, 77–97.
Zhang, J., & Sun. Y. (2011). Reading for idea advancement in a Grade 4 knowledge building community. Instructional Science, 39, 429–452.
Zhang, J., &Chan, C. K. K. (2008). Examining the growth of community knowledge in an online space. Paper presented at the International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE), Taipei, Taiwan.
Zhang, J., Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307.
Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44.
Zhou, N. (2009). Question co-construction in VMT chats. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Studying VirtualMath Teams. New York: Springer Press.		zh_TW