Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 國民小學校長運用網路社群服務與品牌領導關係之研究 —以Facebook為例
A case study investigating the use of a social networking service for the purpose of leadership branding - using Facebook as an Illustrative example作者 尹潔茹
Wan, Kep Ru貢獻者 陳木金
Chen, Mu Jin
尹潔茹
Wan, Kep Ru關鍵詞 國民小學
校長
網路社群服務
校長品牌領導
elementary school
principal
social networking service
brand leadership日期 2011 上傳時間 30-Oct-2012 11:33:21 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究旨在瞭解國民小學校長運用網路社群服務與品牌領導之內涵與現況,並探討與預測其關係,最後依據研究結果提出建議。首先,進行文獻探討,作為研究理論之基礎及發展研究工具之依據;其次,依據教育部編製之一百年度國民小學名錄中抽取25縣市之527位國民小學現任校長,(有效問卷382份),回收情形為預試問卷調查49位國民小學校長,正式問卷382位國民小學校長,以描述統計、獨立樣本T考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關分析、驗證模式分析;最後,依據研究結果進行綜合討論,以形成結論與建議。茲將本研究之主要結論於建議歸納如下:壹、國民小學校長運用Facebook與品牌領導之內涵與現況一、國民小學校長在「校長運用Facebook量表」及其向度的現況得分大多屬 於中高程度,且以「人際關係」向度的得分最高。二、國民小學校長「品牌領導量表」及其向度的現況得分大多屬於中高程度,且 以「校長實施品牌領導的計劃」向度的得分最高。貳、不同背景變項的國民小學校長在運用Facebook與品牌領導得分之差異 情形一、國民小學校長的背景變項中,性別、使用Facebook與否、使用Facebook的頻率,在校長運用Facebook得分之差異達顯著水準。二、國民小學校長背景變項中,學校規模在校長品牌領導得分之差異達顯著水 準。叁、國民小學校長運用Facebook與品牌領導之相關情形一、 整體國民小學校長運用Facebook與品牌領導間呈顯著的正相關,且以 「校長運用Facebook」之「共創價值」向度與「國民小學校長品牌領導」之「學校品牌領導架構與流程」相關程度最高。肆、驗證本模式之國民小學校長運用Facebook與國民小學校長品牌領導的互動 模式各項適配度指標上有潛在變項「校長運用Facebook量表」對下游前在變項「國民小學校長品牌領導」具有顯著的影響力。最後,本研究根據研究發現,提出相關建議,俾供教育行政機關、國民小學校長們以及後續研究之參考。
The main purpose of this research was to investigate the using Facebook for the purpose of Leadership Branding by the Elementary School Principal in Taiwan. The research methods included literature reviews and questionnaire survey.First, the literature review was the basis of argument and for the development of research tools. Secondly, the research instrument was distributed to 527 elementary school principals all over Taiwan and there were 382 valid sample sizes which were used in this study. Using descriptive statistics, Cronbach α, t-test, one- way ANOVA, correlation, and LISREL model, data are analyzed. Finally, the comprehensive discussion was based on the literature reviews, and to make up conclusions and recommendations which were summarized as follows:A. In the aspect of elementary school principal using Facebook1. Facebook includes four parts: Interaction, Brand Image, Relationship, and Creation value. Except for the perception of “Relationship” have significant influences on elementary school principal using Facebook. 2. The background variables in gender, if to use Facebook, frequency of usage Facebook have significant influences on elementary school principal using Facebook. B. In the aspect of Brand Leadership1. The brand leadership includes three parts: the structure and process of school brand leadership, recognizing and stating school brand, principals utilize the plans of brand leadership. Except for the perception of “principals utilize the plans of brand leadership” have significant influences on Brand Leadership. 2. The background variables in size of school have significant influences onBrand Leadership.C. In the aspect of the relationship in between the Facebook and Leadership Branding by the Elementary School Principal1. There was a positive correlation existed among Facebook on dimension of “Creation” and Leadership Branding on dimension of “the structure and process of school brand leadership” by the Elementary School Principal.D. In the aspect of relationship among the Facebook and Leadership Branding by the Elementary School Principal1. There were positively correlation existed among the Facebook and Leadership Branding by the Elementary School Principal.In the last part, according to the findings and results, the researcher proposed some suggestion for the educational officers and the principals of elementary school, hoping to benefit the improvement and development of education of elementary school in the future.參考文獻 中文部分cacaFly團隊(2011)。Facebook精準行銷術--這樣打廣告最吸客。臺北市 : 電腦 人文化。EMBA雜誌第282期(2010年2月出版),網址: http://www.emba.com.tw/ShowArticleCon.asp?artid=7703 (上網日期:2010年05月18日)Hanlon, P. (2006)。品牌的七塊拼圖(Primal branding)。臺北:商智文化。品牌八大核心精神。臺北:商智文化。方文智(2004)。國民小學知識社群之研究---以嘉義縣為例。未出版,國立中正大學教育研究所,嘉義縣。王旭昇(2005)。 網路行銷理論與實務。臺北市: 知城數位科技股份有限公司。王霆、陳勇 (2003)。杜拉克談知識管理,水星文化出版。王孟邦(2001)。虛擬社群管理、社群績效、與獲利模式關係之探討。國立政治大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。吳思華(2005)。知識經濟以創新為引擎。天下,315,40。吳清山、林天祐(2007)。品牌管理。教育資料與研究雙月刊,75,163-164。吳永裕(1996)。單親兒童之親子關係、行為困擾與學習適應研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,臺北市。吳秉恩 (1992)。組織行為學。台北: 華泰文化事業有限公司。吳勉(2010)。口碑行銷與網路社群經營模式分析-以 BIKEID 為例。淡江大學國際商學碩士在職專班學位論文,未出版,臺北市。吳清基(2005)。迎接2005台北市教育品質年:談建構優質學校教育環境。教師天地,134,4-8。吳富傑(2009)。企業利用 Facebook 平台經營粉絲專頁社群之研究。國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,臺北市。余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式: SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市:高等教育。宋東(2006)。微軟揮灑「未來學校」藍圖。2007年6月9日,取自http://ad.cw.com.tw/cw/2006kids/content05.asp 李郁樓、蔣世寶, et al.(2011)。探討 Facebook 之認知互動及價值對忠誠度之關聯研究, 設計研究學報,4,50-6。李佳純、鄭君良(2001)。虛擬社區介紹,《南華大學社會所電子期刊》(卷第十二期)。林孟慧(2009)。國民小學校長運用品牌領導與學校創新經營關係之研究. 國立政治大學教育行政暨政策研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。林蘋、陳素緩,et al. (2005)。網路社群知識分享影響因素之探討。邱慧菁(譯)(2008)。Bhargava, R.。品牌個性影響力:數位時代的口碑行銷。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。洪惠芳(譯) (2011)。Dave Kerpen。Likeable Social Media(「讚」起來,開始拉攏顧客變粉絲)。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。徐世同 (譯) (2008)。Keller, K. L.。Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity(策略品牌管理)。臺北市: 華泰文化。高登第(譯)(2002)。David A.Asker, E. J.。Brand leadership(品牌領導)。臺北市:天下遠見。孫健、趙濤(2007)。企業創新經營三部曲。臺北:大利。張美美 (2007)。網際網路經營關鍵成功因素之探討: 以網路社群為例。張博裕(2011)。國小校長專業學習社群與省思能力關係之研究。臺北市立教育大學教育研究所碩士文論,未出版,臺北市。張钿富。教育行政理念與創新。高等教育部。陳品宏 (2009)。面對面與 Facebook 之人際互動研究。 臺灣大學資訊管理學研究所學位論文。陳廣﹙2006﹚。我家不只賣咖啡:星巴克帝國品牌奇蹟=STARBUCKS. 臺北市: 海洋文化。麥慧芬(譯) (2002)。Scott Bedbury & Stephen Fenichell。品牌始終來自人性:領導湯志民(2005)。 優質校園營造之實踐: 以政大附中為例。教師天地,139,12-19。黃國序(2006)。國民小學校長品牌管理態度與實施策略之研究-以台北縣公立國民小學為例。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文。未出版, 臺北。黃莉雯 (2007)。虛擬社群網站品牌建立與網站品牌權益評估。黃義良、馬惠祺 (2008)。國民小學品牌管理,學校效能及其關係之研究。初等教育學刊,30,63-84。葉連祺 (2003)。中小學品牌管理意涵和模式之分析。教育研究月刊,114,96-110。楊錦潭(2011)。2010臉書漫談。臺北市: 維科圖書(初版)。劉毓民(2000)。善用網路資訊科技提供消費者一對一的客製化服務。臺北市:ARC 遠擎管理顧問公司企業智慧部。蔡秉螢(2007)。幼兒園品牌領導策略之研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。蔡進雄(2010)。論學校轉型為專業學習社群的校長領導作為。蔡進雄(2004)。領導新典範: 後英雄式領導的意涵及其對學校行政領導的啟示。教育政策論壇,七卷一期: 111-130.戴振浩(2011)。國民小學校長生涯專業發展規畫之研究。國立台北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所博士論文,臺北市。魏惠娟 (2006)。台灣地區學校行銷研究評析及其對學校行銷策略規劃的啟示: 1984-2004的探索,教育政策論壇。谯璐璐 (2008)。下一个網絡霸主-FACEBOOK。商場現代化,25,65-66.英文部分Aaker, D. A. (2000). Brand leadership. UK: The Free Press.Alexa the web information company. Retrieved from http://www.alexa.com/. Retrieved March 29, 2008, from the World Wide Web: http://www.well.com/~hlr/texts/VCcivil.html.Anderson, R.E., & Dexter, S.L (2000).School technology leadership: Incidence and impact.teaching, learning, and computing: 1988 national survey, report #6. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED449786)Anonymous. (2010). How to...apply thought leadership to social media. PR News, 66(1), n/a-n/a. Bedbury, Scott, and Stephen Fenichell (2002). A new brand world: 8 principles for achieving brand leadership in the 21st Century. New York:Viking,Penguin.Bergstrom, A. (2000). Cyberbranding: Leverage your brand on the internet.Strategy & Leadership, 28(4), 10-15.Berry, L. (2000). Cultivating service brand equity. Journal of the Academy ofMarketing Science, 28(1), 128-137.Bollen (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Brooks-Young, S.(2006). Critical technology issues for school leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Brown, J.S.& Duguid, P. (2001). Structure and spontaneity: Knowledge andOrganization.London: Sage.Brugmann, J. & Prahalad, C. K. (2007). Cocreating business`s new social compact.Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 80.Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S& Kraut, R.et al. (2007). Community effort in online groups: Who does the work and why?.Human-Computer Interaction Institute,(11),90.Burton, S. (2011). Interactive or reactive? Marketing with twitter. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(7), 491-499.Carpenter, P. (2000). E-brands- building on internet business at breakneckspeed. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Casaló, Luis V., Carlos Flavián and Miguel Guinaliu (2008), “Promoting Consumer’s Participation in Virtual Brand Communities: A New Paradigm in Brand Strategies,” Journal of Marketing Communication, 14(1), 19-36. CheckFacebook(2012). Facebook Marketing Statistics,Demographics,Reports & News. Retrieved March,05,2012 from www.checkFacebook.comChernatony, L. D.,& William,M. G. (1989).Branding terminology the real rebate. Marketing Intelligence and Planning,10, pp.29-32.Constant, D., Lee, S., and Sara, K. (1996).The kindness of strangers: The usefulnessof electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 135.Dayal, S., Landesberg, H. and Zeisser, M. (2000). Building digital brands. TheMcKinsey Quarterly, 2, 42-51.Drucker, P. F. (1986). The changed world economy. Foreign Affairs, 64(4), 768-791.Drath, W. H. (1998). Approaching the future of leadership development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass(pp.403-432).Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1): 210-230.Facebook, I.(2009). Facebook. Retrieved September, 14, 2009 fromhttp://www.insidefaceboo2009/02/14/Facebook-surpasses-175-million-userscontinuing- to-grow-by-600k-usersday/Fernback, J. & Thompson, B. (1995). Virtual Communities: Abort, Retry, Failure?Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Albuquerque:New Mexico. Freeman, C., 1982. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Pinter Publishers, London.Figallo, C. (1998). Hosting web communities: building relationships, increasing customer loyalty, and maintaining a competitive edge. Chicester, UK: Wiley.Fiol, C. M. & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 803-813.Fullan, M. (2002). Leadership and sustainability. Principal Leadership, 3(4), 14-17。Galunic, D. C. & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1193-1201. Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application(4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.Geering, A. D. (1992). Professional development needs of school principals.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED239370)Gilbert, R. (2006). Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where are we in the competition-innovation debate? The MIT Press. Hagel, J. & Armstrong, A. (1997). Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities.Harvard Business Press. Han, J. K., Kim,N. & Srivastva, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link?The Journal of Marketing, 30-45.Hauknes, J. (1998). Services in innovation–innovation in services.STEP Report Series.Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange.American journal of Sociology,597-606.Holzner & Steven (2009). Facebook Marketing: Leverage Social Media to Grow Your Business. Indianapolis, IN: Que Publishing. Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K. & Chowdury, A.(2009). Micro-blogging as online word of mouth Branding. Social and Behavioral Sciences - Economics.Jöreskog, K. G.& Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications.Chicago:SPSS.Kapferer, J. N. (1997). Strategic brand management: Creating and sustaning brand equity long term (2nd ed.). Mildford, CT: Kogan Page US.Keasley, G., & Lynch, W. (1994).Educational technology leadeship perspectives. Englewoood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity.Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall.Kim, W. C. and Mauborgne, R. (1997). Value innovation: the strategic logic of high growth. Harvard Business Review,75(1),102.Kirkpatrick, D. (2011). The Facebook effect: The inside story of the company that is connecting the world: Simon and Schuster.Koh, J. & Kim, Y.G. (2004). Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An e-Business perspective. Expert Systems with Applications, 26, 155-166. Kotler, P. and Andreasen, A.R. (1991), Strategic Marketing for Nonprofit Organizations, 4th. ed.,Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Krivak, T. (2008). Facebook 101: Ten Things You Need to Know About Facebook, 25(3). NJ: Information Today. Lagerweij, N.&Voogt ,J.& Seashore, L. K. (1998). School development and organizational learning: Toward an integrative theory.Organizational Learning in Schools, 237-260.Lambert, L. (1998).Building leadership capacity in school. US:Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.Lee, F. S., Vogel, D. & Limayem, M. (2003).Virtual community informatics: Areview and research agenda. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 5(1), 47-61.Leithwood, K. A. & Riehl, C.(2005). What do we already know about educational leadership. A new agenda for research in educational leadership,12-27.Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M.,Wimmer, A.& Christakis, C. (2008). Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks, 30 (4), 330-342.Magnusson, D. & Ekehammar, B. (1978). Similar situations--Similar behaviors? A study of the intraindividual congruence between situation perception and situation reactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 12(1), 41-48.McAlexander, James, H., Schouten, J. W. & Harold, F. K. (2002). Building brand community. Journal of Marketing, 66(Jan.), 38-54. McGovern, G. (2000). The caring economy. Retrieved May 25, 2008, from theWorld Wide Web: http://www.thecaringeconomy.com.Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem.Psychology Today 2(1), 60-67.Mitchell, L. (2000). Branding equals smart e-business. Infoworld, 22(1), 47-48. Moreira, J.& Silva, M. J., Simões, J. & Sousa, G. (2012). Drivers of Marketing Innovation in Portuguese Firms. The Amfiteatru Economic Journal,14(31), 195-206.Morgan, B. (2007). Integrated marketing communication. International Business Review,16(4).Moser, M. (2003). United we brand: how to create a cohesive brand that`s seen, heard, and remembered.UK: Harvard Business Press.Mullen, C. A.&Hutinger, J. L.(2008). The principal`s role in fostering collaborative learning communities through faculty study group development. Theory Into Practice,47(4),276-285.Muniz, Albert, M. J.,Thomas,C,& Guinn, O. (2001). Brand Community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(March), 412-432. Neumeier,M.(2003).The brand gap:How to bridge the distance between business strategy and design. Barkeley, CA:New Riders.O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software, Retrieved Sept 2005, from the http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.htmlPreece, J. (2000). Online Communities. Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.Pike, S. (2005).The use of repertory grid analysis and importance-performance analysis to identify determinant attributes of universities. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 14(2), 1-18.Ries, A. & Jack, T. (1981). Positioning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Ries, A. and Ries, L. (2000). The 11 Immutable Laws of Internet Branding. USA:Harper Collins.Rethlefsen, M. L. (2010). Tools at Work: Facebook. Library Journal,135(12), 2.Rheingold, H.(1993). The virtual community: Finding commection in a computerized world. Boston, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman .Ridings, Catherin M., David Gefen, and Bay Arinze (2002). Some Antecedents and Effects of Trust in Virtual Communities. Journal of Strategic Information 30 Systems, 11, 271-295.Rosen, A. (2009). E-Learning 2.0: Proven Practices and Emerging Technologies to Achieve Results.NY, American Management Association.Schneider, R. L. (2005). Marketing medical education: An examination of recruitment web sites for traditional and combined-degree MD programs. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 14(2),19-36.Smith, M. A.& Leigh, B.(1997). Virtual subjects: Using the internet as an alternative source of subjects and research environment. Behavior Research Methods, 29(4), 496-505.Smith, M. K. (1999). Peter Senge and the learning organization. Harvard Busines Review, 1-16. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication.42 (4), 73-93.Peters, T. J. (1999). The circle of innovation: You can`t shrink your way togreatness.Vintage.Wasko, M. M. and Faraj, S. (2000). It is What One Does: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice.Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 155-173.Watkins, K. E. & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Consulting using action technologies. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education (58), 81-90.Wellman, B. & Gulia, M. (1999). Net surfers don`t ride alone: Virtual communities as communities.Networks in the Global Village,331-366.Wenger, E.C. and Snyder, W. M.(2000).Communities of practice: The organizational Frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139-145.Wikipedia.(2011). Social network service. Retrieved January 7, 2011, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_network_serviceWikipedia. (2011b). Facebook. Retrieved January 7, 2011, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FacebookWolfe, R. A. (1994). Organizational Innovation: Review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management, 31(3): 405-431.Valdez, G. (2004). Technology leadership: Enchancing positive educational change. Retrieved August 31, 2006, from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/educatrs/leadrshp/le700.htm 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
99152026
100資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099152026 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 陳木金 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chen, Mu Jin en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 尹潔茹 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wan, Kep Ru en_US dc.creator (作者) 尹潔茹 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Wan, Kep Ru en_US dc.date (日期) 2011 en_US dc.date.accessioned 30-Oct-2012 11:33:21 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 30-Oct-2012 11:33:21 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 30-Oct-2012 11:33:21 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0099152026 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54723 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 教育研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 99152026 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 100 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究旨在瞭解國民小學校長運用網路社群服務與品牌領導之內涵與現況,並探討與預測其關係,最後依據研究結果提出建議。首先,進行文獻探討,作為研究理論之基礎及發展研究工具之依據;其次,依據教育部編製之一百年度國民小學名錄中抽取25縣市之527位國民小學現任校長,(有效問卷382份),回收情形為預試問卷調查49位國民小學校長,正式問卷382位國民小學校長,以描述統計、獨立樣本T考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關分析、驗證模式分析;最後,依據研究結果進行綜合討論,以形成結論與建議。茲將本研究之主要結論於建議歸納如下:壹、國民小學校長運用Facebook與品牌領導之內涵與現況一、國民小學校長在「校長運用Facebook量表」及其向度的現況得分大多屬 於中高程度,且以「人際關係」向度的得分最高。二、國民小學校長「品牌領導量表」及其向度的現況得分大多屬於中高程度,且 以「校長實施品牌領導的計劃」向度的得分最高。貳、不同背景變項的國民小學校長在運用Facebook與品牌領導得分之差異 情形一、國民小學校長的背景變項中,性別、使用Facebook與否、使用Facebook的頻率,在校長運用Facebook得分之差異達顯著水準。二、國民小學校長背景變項中,學校規模在校長品牌領導得分之差異達顯著水 準。叁、國民小學校長運用Facebook與品牌領導之相關情形一、 整體國民小學校長運用Facebook與品牌領導間呈顯著的正相關,且以 「校長運用Facebook」之「共創價值」向度與「國民小學校長品牌領導」之「學校品牌領導架構與流程」相關程度最高。肆、驗證本模式之國民小學校長運用Facebook與國民小學校長品牌領導的互動 模式各項適配度指標上有潛在變項「校長運用Facebook量表」對下游前在變項「國民小學校長品牌領導」具有顯著的影響力。最後,本研究根據研究發現,提出相關建議,俾供教育行政機關、國民小學校長們以及後續研究之參考。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) The main purpose of this research was to investigate the using Facebook for the purpose of Leadership Branding by the Elementary School Principal in Taiwan. The research methods included literature reviews and questionnaire survey.First, the literature review was the basis of argument and for the development of research tools. Secondly, the research instrument was distributed to 527 elementary school principals all over Taiwan and there were 382 valid sample sizes which were used in this study. Using descriptive statistics, Cronbach α, t-test, one- way ANOVA, correlation, and LISREL model, data are analyzed. Finally, the comprehensive discussion was based on the literature reviews, and to make up conclusions and recommendations which were summarized as follows:A. In the aspect of elementary school principal using Facebook1. Facebook includes four parts: Interaction, Brand Image, Relationship, and Creation value. Except for the perception of “Relationship” have significant influences on elementary school principal using Facebook. 2. The background variables in gender, if to use Facebook, frequency of usage Facebook have significant influences on elementary school principal using Facebook. B. In the aspect of Brand Leadership1. The brand leadership includes three parts: the structure and process of school brand leadership, recognizing and stating school brand, principals utilize the plans of brand leadership. Except for the perception of “principals utilize the plans of brand leadership” have significant influences on Brand Leadership. 2. The background variables in size of school have significant influences onBrand Leadership.C. In the aspect of the relationship in between the Facebook and Leadership Branding by the Elementary School Principal1. There was a positive correlation existed among Facebook on dimension of “Creation” and Leadership Branding on dimension of “the structure and process of school brand leadership” by the Elementary School Principal.D. In the aspect of relationship among the Facebook and Leadership Branding by the Elementary School Principal1. There were positively correlation existed among the Facebook and Leadership Branding by the Elementary School Principal.In the last part, according to the findings and results, the researcher proposed some suggestion for the educational officers and the principals of elementary school, hoping to benefit the improvement and development of education of elementary school in the future. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論.....................................................................................................1第一節 研究動機...............................................................................................1第二節 研究目的與待答問題...........................................................................5第三節 重要名詞釋義.......................................................................................6第四節 研究範圍與限制.................................................................................10第二章 文獻探討...........................................................................................11第一節 Web 2.0的興起與網路社群服務的概念與發展................................11第二節 Facebook(臉書)效應結合學校行銷創新概念......................... .........22第三節 品牌領導的理論與研究.................................................................... 38第四節 國民小學校長運用Facebook (臉書)與品牌領導關係之相關之究研究.........................................................................................................50 第三章 研究設計與實施.............................................................................61第一節 研究架構.............................................................................................61第二節 研究對象.............................................................................................63第三節 研究工具.............................................................................................69 第四節 實施程序.............................................................................................84第五節 資料處分析.........................................................................................86第四章 研究結果與討論..............................................................................89第一章 國民小學校長運用Facebook與學校品牌領導之內涵與現況.........89第二章 不同背景變項的國民小學校長在運用Facebook與品牌領導之差異 情形.....................................................................................................96第三章 國民小學校長運用Facebook與學校品牌領導之相關分析...........120第四節 驗證本研究模式之適配度與影響力...............................................122第五節 綜合討論...........................................................................................133第五章 結論與建議....................................................................................149第一節 結論...................................................................................................149第二節 建議...................................................................................................153參考文獻......................................................................................................162中文部分.........................................................................................................162英文部分.........................................................................................................165附錄................................................................................................................171問卷初稿.........................................................................................................171專家效度問卷(預試問卷) .............................................................................177專家語句修正.................................................................................................182正式問卷.........................................................................................................190「校長運用品牌領導」問卷授權同意書.................................................... 196國民小學校長運用網路社群服務與校長品牌領導之互動模式關係圖............. 197 zh_TW dc.language.iso en_US - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099152026 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國民小學 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 校長 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 網路社群服務 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 校長品牌領導 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) elementary school en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) principal en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) social networking service en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) brand leadership en_US dc.title (題名) 國民小學校長運用網路社群服務與品牌領導關係之研究 —以Facebook為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) A case study investigating the use of a social networking service for the purpose of leadership branding - using Facebook as an Illustrative example en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分cacaFly團隊(2011)。Facebook精準行銷術--這樣打廣告最吸客。臺北市 : 電腦 人文化。EMBA雜誌第282期(2010年2月出版),網址: http://www.emba.com.tw/ShowArticleCon.asp?artid=7703 (上網日期:2010年05月18日)Hanlon, P. (2006)。品牌的七塊拼圖(Primal branding)。臺北:商智文化。品牌八大核心精神。臺北:商智文化。方文智(2004)。國民小學知識社群之研究---以嘉義縣為例。未出版,國立中正大學教育研究所,嘉義縣。王旭昇(2005)。 網路行銷理論與實務。臺北市: 知城數位科技股份有限公司。王霆、陳勇 (2003)。杜拉克談知識管理,水星文化出版。王孟邦(2001)。虛擬社群管理、社群績效、與獲利模式關係之探討。國立政治大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。吳思華(2005)。知識經濟以創新為引擎。天下,315,40。吳清山、林天祐(2007)。品牌管理。教育資料與研究雙月刊,75,163-164。吳永裕(1996)。單親兒童之親子關係、行為困擾與學習適應研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,臺北市。吳秉恩 (1992)。組織行為學。台北: 華泰文化事業有限公司。吳勉(2010)。口碑行銷與網路社群經營模式分析-以 BIKEID 為例。淡江大學國際商學碩士在職專班學位論文,未出版,臺北市。吳清基(2005)。迎接2005台北市教育品質年:談建構優質學校教育環境。教師天地,134,4-8。吳富傑(2009)。企業利用 Facebook 平台經營粉絲專頁社群之研究。國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,臺北市。余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式: SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市:高等教育。宋東(2006)。微軟揮灑「未來學校」藍圖。2007年6月9日,取自http://ad.cw.com.tw/cw/2006kids/content05.asp 李郁樓、蔣世寶, et al.(2011)。探討 Facebook 之認知互動及價值對忠誠度之關聯研究, 設計研究學報,4,50-6。李佳純、鄭君良(2001)。虛擬社區介紹,《南華大學社會所電子期刊》(卷第十二期)。林孟慧(2009)。國民小學校長運用品牌領導與學校創新經營關係之研究. 國立政治大學教育行政暨政策研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。林蘋、陳素緩,et al. (2005)。網路社群知識分享影響因素之探討。邱慧菁(譯)(2008)。Bhargava, R.。品牌個性影響力:數位時代的口碑行銷。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。洪惠芳(譯) (2011)。Dave Kerpen。Likeable Social Media(「讚」起來,開始拉攏顧客變粉絲)。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。徐世同 (譯) (2008)。Keller, K. L.。Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity(策略品牌管理)。臺北市: 華泰文化。高登第(譯)(2002)。David A.Asker, E. J.。Brand leadership(品牌領導)。臺北市:天下遠見。孫健、趙濤(2007)。企業創新經營三部曲。臺北:大利。張美美 (2007)。網際網路經營關鍵成功因素之探討: 以網路社群為例。張博裕(2011)。國小校長專業學習社群與省思能力關係之研究。臺北市立教育大學教育研究所碩士文論,未出版,臺北市。張钿富。教育行政理念與創新。高等教育部。陳品宏 (2009)。面對面與 Facebook 之人際互動研究。 臺灣大學資訊管理學研究所學位論文。陳廣﹙2006﹚。我家不只賣咖啡:星巴克帝國品牌奇蹟=STARBUCKS. 臺北市: 海洋文化。麥慧芬(譯) (2002)。Scott Bedbury & Stephen Fenichell。品牌始終來自人性:領導湯志民(2005)。 優質校園營造之實踐: 以政大附中為例。教師天地,139,12-19。黃國序(2006)。國民小學校長品牌管理態度與實施策略之研究-以台北縣公立國民小學為例。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文。未出版, 臺北。黃莉雯 (2007)。虛擬社群網站品牌建立與網站品牌權益評估。黃義良、馬惠祺 (2008)。國民小學品牌管理,學校效能及其關係之研究。初等教育學刊,30,63-84。葉連祺 (2003)。中小學品牌管理意涵和模式之分析。教育研究月刊,114,96-110。楊錦潭(2011)。2010臉書漫談。臺北市: 維科圖書(初版)。劉毓民(2000)。善用網路資訊科技提供消費者一對一的客製化服務。臺北市:ARC 遠擎管理顧問公司企業智慧部。蔡秉螢(2007)。幼兒園品牌領導策略之研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。蔡進雄(2010)。論學校轉型為專業學習社群的校長領導作為。蔡進雄(2004)。領導新典範: 後英雄式領導的意涵及其對學校行政領導的啟示。教育政策論壇,七卷一期: 111-130.戴振浩(2011)。國民小學校長生涯專業發展規畫之研究。國立台北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所博士論文,臺北市。魏惠娟 (2006)。台灣地區學校行銷研究評析及其對學校行銷策略規劃的啟示: 1984-2004的探索,教育政策論壇。谯璐璐 (2008)。下一个網絡霸主-FACEBOOK。商場現代化,25,65-66.英文部分Aaker, D. A. (2000). Brand leadership. UK: The Free Press.Alexa the web information company. Retrieved from http://www.alexa.com/. Retrieved March 29, 2008, from the World Wide Web: http://www.well.com/~hlr/texts/VCcivil.html.Anderson, R.E., & Dexter, S.L (2000).School technology leadership: Incidence and impact.teaching, learning, and computing: 1988 national survey, report #6. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED449786)Anonymous. (2010). How to...apply thought leadership to social media. PR News, 66(1), n/a-n/a. Bedbury, Scott, and Stephen Fenichell (2002). A new brand world: 8 principles for achieving brand leadership in the 21st Century. New York:Viking,Penguin.Bergstrom, A. (2000). Cyberbranding: Leverage your brand on the internet.Strategy & Leadership, 28(4), 10-15.Berry, L. (2000). Cultivating service brand equity. Journal of the Academy ofMarketing Science, 28(1), 128-137.Bollen (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Brooks-Young, S.(2006). Critical technology issues for school leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Brown, J.S.& Duguid, P. (2001). Structure and spontaneity: Knowledge andOrganization.London: Sage.Brugmann, J. & Prahalad, C. K. (2007). Cocreating business`s new social compact.Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 80.Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S& Kraut, R.et al. (2007). Community effort in online groups: Who does the work and why?.Human-Computer Interaction Institute,(11),90.Burton, S. (2011). Interactive or reactive? Marketing with twitter. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(7), 491-499.Carpenter, P. (2000). E-brands- building on internet business at breakneckspeed. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Casaló, Luis V., Carlos Flavián and Miguel Guinaliu (2008), “Promoting Consumer’s Participation in Virtual Brand Communities: A New Paradigm in Brand Strategies,” Journal of Marketing Communication, 14(1), 19-36. CheckFacebook(2012). Facebook Marketing Statistics,Demographics,Reports & News. Retrieved March,05,2012 from www.checkFacebook.comChernatony, L. D.,& William,M. G. (1989).Branding terminology the real rebate. Marketing Intelligence and Planning,10, pp.29-32.Constant, D., Lee, S., and Sara, K. (1996).The kindness of strangers: The usefulnessof electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 135.Dayal, S., Landesberg, H. and Zeisser, M. (2000). Building digital brands. TheMcKinsey Quarterly, 2, 42-51.Drucker, P. F. (1986). The changed world economy. Foreign Affairs, 64(4), 768-791.Drath, W. H. (1998). Approaching the future of leadership development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass(pp.403-432).Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1): 210-230.Facebook, I.(2009). Facebook. Retrieved September, 14, 2009 fromhttp://www.insidefaceboo2009/02/14/Facebook-surpasses-175-million-userscontinuing- to-grow-by-600k-usersday/Fernback, J. & Thompson, B. (1995). Virtual Communities: Abort, Retry, Failure?Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Albuquerque:New Mexico. Freeman, C., 1982. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Pinter Publishers, London.Figallo, C. (1998). Hosting web communities: building relationships, increasing customer loyalty, and maintaining a competitive edge. Chicester, UK: Wiley.Fiol, C. M. & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 803-813.Fullan, M. (2002). Leadership and sustainability. Principal Leadership, 3(4), 14-17。Galunic, D. C. & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1193-1201. Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application(4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.Geering, A. D. (1992). Professional development needs of school principals.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED239370)Gilbert, R. (2006). Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where are we in the competition-innovation debate? The MIT Press. Hagel, J. & Armstrong, A. (1997). Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities.Harvard Business Press. Han, J. K., Kim,N. & Srivastva, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link?The Journal of Marketing, 30-45.Hauknes, J. (1998). Services in innovation–innovation in services.STEP Report Series.Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange.American journal of Sociology,597-606.Holzner & Steven (2009). Facebook Marketing: Leverage Social Media to Grow Your Business. Indianapolis, IN: Que Publishing. Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K. & Chowdury, A.(2009). Micro-blogging as online word of mouth Branding. Social and Behavioral Sciences - Economics.Jöreskog, K. G.& Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications.Chicago:SPSS.Kapferer, J. N. (1997). Strategic brand management: Creating and sustaning brand equity long term (2nd ed.). Mildford, CT: Kogan Page US.Keasley, G., & Lynch, W. (1994).Educational technology leadeship perspectives. Englewoood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity.Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall.Kim, W. C. and Mauborgne, R. (1997). Value innovation: the strategic logic of high growth. Harvard Business Review,75(1),102.Kirkpatrick, D. (2011). The Facebook effect: The inside story of the company that is connecting the world: Simon and Schuster.Koh, J. & Kim, Y.G. (2004). Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An e-Business perspective. Expert Systems with Applications, 26, 155-166. Kotler, P. and Andreasen, A.R. (1991), Strategic Marketing for Nonprofit Organizations, 4th. ed.,Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Krivak, T. (2008). Facebook 101: Ten Things You Need to Know About Facebook, 25(3). NJ: Information Today. Lagerweij, N.&Voogt ,J.& Seashore, L. K. (1998). School development and organizational learning: Toward an integrative theory.Organizational Learning in Schools, 237-260.Lambert, L. (1998).Building leadership capacity in school. US:Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.Lee, F. S., Vogel, D. & Limayem, M. (2003).Virtual community informatics: Areview and research agenda. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 5(1), 47-61.Leithwood, K. A. & Riehl, C.(2005). What do we already know about educational leadership. A new agenda for research in educational leadership,12-27.Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M.,Wimmer, A.& Christakis, C. (2008). Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using Facebook.com. Social Networks, 30 (4), 330-342.Magnusson, D. & Ekehammar, B. (1978). Similar situations--Similar behaviors? A study of the intraindividual congruence between situation perception and situation reactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 12(1), 41-48.McAlexander, James, H., Schouten, J. W. & Harold, F. K. (2002). Building brand community. Journal of Marketing, 66(Jan.), 38-54. McGovern, G. (2000). The caring economy. Retrieved May 25, 2008, from theWorld Wide Web: http://www.thecaringeconomy.com.Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem.Psychology Today 2(1), 60-67.Mitchell, L. (2000). Branding equals smart e-business. Infoworld, 22(1), 47-48. Moreira, J.& Silva, M. J., Simões, J. & Sousa, G. (2012). Drivers of Marketing Innovation in Portuguese Firms. The Amfiteatru Economic Journal,14(31), 195-206.Morgan, B. (2007). Integrated marketing communication. International Business Review,16(4).Moser, M. (2003). United we brand: how to create a cohesive brand that`s seen, heard, and remembered.UK: Harvard Business Press.Mullen, C. A.&Hutinger, J. L.(2008). The principal`s role in fostering collaborative learning communities through faculty study group development. Theory Into Practice,47(4),276-285.Muniz, Albert, M. J.,Thomas,C,& Guinn, O. (2001). Brand Community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(March), 412-432. Neumeier,M.(2003).The brand gap:How to bridge the distance between business strategy and design. Barkeley, CA:New Riders.O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software, Retrieved Sept 2005, from the http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.htmlPreece, J. (2000). Online Communities. Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.Pike, S. (2005).The use of repertory grid analysis and importance-performance analysis to identify determinant attributes of universities. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 14(2), 1-18.Ries, A. & Jack, T. (1981). Positioning. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Ries, A. and Ries, L. (2000). The 11 Immutable Laws of Internet Branding. USA:Harper Collins.Rethlefsen, M. L. (2010). Tools at Work: Facebook. Library Journal,135(12), 2.Rheingold, H.(1993). The virtual community: Finding commection in a computerized world. Boston, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman .Ridings, Catherin M., David Gefen, and Bay Arinze (2002). Some Antecedents and Effects of Trust in Virtual Communities. Journal of Strategic Information 30 Systems, 11, 271-295.Rosen, A. (2009). E-Learning 2.0: Proven Practices and Emerging Technologies to Achieve Results.NY, American Management Association.Schneider, R. L. (2005). Marketing medical education: An examination of recruitment web sites for traditional and combined-degree MD programs. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 14(2),19-36.Smith, M. A.& Leigh, B.(1997). Virtual subjects: Using the internet as an alternative source of subjects and research environment. Behavior Research Methods, 29(4), 496-505.Smith, M. K. (1999). Peter Senge and the learning organization. Harvard Busines Review, 1-16. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication.42 (4), 73-93.Peters, T. J. (1999). The circle of innovation: You can`t shrink your way togreatness.Vintage.Wasko, M. M. and Faraj, S. (2000). It is What One Does: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice.Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 155-173.Watkins, K. E. & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Consulting using action technologies. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education (58), 81-90.Wellman, B. & Gulia, M. (1999). Net surfers don`t ride alone: Virtual communities as communities.Networks in the Global Village,331-366.Wenger, E.C. and Snyder, W. M.(2000).Communities of practice: The organizational Frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139-145.Wikipedia.(2011). Social network service. Retrieved January 7, 2011, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_network_serviceWikipedia. (2011b). Facebook. Retrieved January 7, 2011, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FacebookWolfe, R. A. (1994). Organizational Innovation: Review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management, 31(3): 405-431.Valdez, G. (2004). Technology leadership: Enchancing positive educational change. Retrieved August 31, 2006, from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/educatrs/leadrshp/le700.htm zh_TW