學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 電影內容作為商品的歷史過程及其利潤分析: 以好萊塢為核心的研究
The history of commoditization of motion picture and profit rate: The case of Hollywood作者 張時健
Chang, Shih Chen貢獻者 馮建三
Feng, Chien San
張時健
Chang, Shih Chen關鍵詞 美國影視產業
馬克思主義
資本積累
利潤率下降趨勢
生產模式
US motion picture industry
Marxism
Accumulation of capital
Tendency of the rate of profit to fall
Mode of production日期 2011 上傳時間 30-Oct-2012 14:20:23 (UTC+8) 摘要 美國的少數幾家大型影視產業資本不僅主導了境內市場，也在全球市場占有領先的份額，因而對美國影視產業的批判經常出自於反壟斷、反帝反傾銷的動機，目的在保護民族市場或多元文化。然而美國是最早讓動態影像（motion picture）商業化、產業化，使資本能藉之積累擴張，而不必由政府以長期固定的財政手段支持的少數國家之一；並且不同於大量進口產品與技術的後進國，美國很早就成為影視產品的淨出口國，同時在傳播科技與生產手段上持續革新，一至如今。藉由探索美國影視產業的發展史，有助於我們理解影視產業資本的運動軌跡；也就是探討在影視產業內，資本如何剝奪剩餘價值、發達生產力、擴大生產規模的政治經濟歷程。一般而言，個別資本為擴大利潤率而不斷地更新生產技術以提升生產力，長期卻總體地導致利潤率下降的結果。或說資本運動具有周期性：按利潤率的波動，一再地經歷危機、蕭條、復甦、高漲的循環。美國影視產業史已經說明了這些階段，然而利潤率如何變遷，以及相應生產手段的更替、生產關係的變革，還有待釐清。藉長時段的國民所得與生產帳（National Income and Product Account, NIPA）以及產業稅務報告所登錄的資料，本文得到 1947年至1997年間電影業前後一貫可比較的利潤率計算根據。資料顯示，二十世紀下半的美國電影利潤率幾經波動，長期有明顯下降的趨勢。按Weisskopf所提的利潤率要項拆解法，就各周期利潤率作進一步分析，可知戰後利潤率轉壞主因為市場萎縮減產，七○年後利潤率轉壞則因為工資上升與資本投入過速的效果。在回顧美國電影業百年來的流通手段與生產過程歷程後，與利潤率變遷材料與分析結果互為理解，可知晚近利潤率轉壞的主因為資本仰賴少數廠外秀異生產者，使對生產者的工資議價力降低。與早年的量產制相較，這是資本解散廠內長聘勞動隊伍，使生產外部化造成的非意圖後果。為突破量產時代的生產力發展瓶頸，資本逐漸集中到少量差異化的高質量特製電影製作上，以爭取更深更廣的流通，實現更高的利潤份額，同時節省量產所需的人力。長期下來造成資本的兩極分配，使勞動者的晉升、流動乃至於再生產出現困難。資本因應秀異者高工資的利潤擠壓以及勞動者再生產困難的困局，是藉全球化之便作生產外逃，使產業空洞化。除了取他國低廉勞動力與製作補貼的外因以解釋晚近美國電影業深化全球分工的格局，本文試圖提供長時段資本運動的內因，作為理解當代全球好萊塢構造的另一途徑。
A few giant corporations dominate US domestic motion picture market and also play key roles in global markets. So people who criticize this situations are usually motivated by goals of anti-monopoly, anti-imperialist or anti-dumping and want to protect their own national market or pluralistic culture. However, motion pictures in US have been commercialized and traded for capital accumulation and expansion since their birth. Not like other countries` governments give stable financial support to their movie and TV industries, US motion picture industry seldom received government direct supports and US has been major exporter of video goods and new communication technology after 1910s. By exploring the history of motion picture industry we would understand the capital movement of this industry. In other words, we need to identify the political economic process of capital exploits video goods, occupies surplus value, and promotes the innovation of technology and expansion.Generally speaking, individual capital renews production technology and upgrades productivity for higher rate of profit while makes macro/total profit rate falling in the long run. It is said that the movement of capital is cyclic and production would experiences phases like crisis, recessionary, recovery, and upswing. We could identify these phases in the history of US motion picture industry, but we didn`t know exactly how and why profit rate fluctuated and the mode of production, relation of production changed correspondingly.I collected raw data from National Income and Product Account published by Bureau of Economic Analysis and corporation tax reports published by Internal Revenue System which were calculated for for profit rate of motion picture industry from 1947 to 1997. The result shows that the rate of profit falling in the long run. And I used Weisskopf`s method to analysis the factors of profit rate and have conclusions that the first falling rate of profit after 2nd world war was caused by market shrinking and the second one was caused by rising wage and organic composition of capital. By reviewing the history of US motion picture industry, especially the process of means of circulation and production changed, then comparing the history with trend of profit rate, I argue that the main reason of falling rate in last decades is stronger bargaining power of a few elite talents who asked for ultra-high compensations. When capital faced shrinking market and tried to saved normal cost by dismissing lots of in-house labour and production outsourcing, it could not help but rely "free" workers and accepted unexpected high wages while more and more fund and resources were concentrated on fewer and fewer production projects. A few ultra-high quality films which circulate more widely and deeply would realize more profit and save labour cost for capital. But in the long run this would polarize capital using and make upgrading, mobility and reproduction of labour more difficult. Furthermore, the accumulation of capital is difficult too as profit rate falling.Capital responded to this plight by production runaway. This is the main issue of Global Hollywood. Besides the factors of cheaper labour or subsidies from foreign governments, I try to argue the inner logic of capital movement would lead the same result. That`s why global Hollywood globalized.參考文獻 馬克思（1975〉。《資本論：政治經濟學批判》。第三卷。北京：人民出版社。劉明遠（2009）。《馬克思主義經濟危機和周期理論的結構與變遷》。北京：中國人民大學出版社。Aksoy, A., & Robins, K. (1992). Hollywood for the 21th century: global competition for critical mass in image market. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 16(1), 1-22.Albert, S. (1998). Movie stars and the distribution of financially successful films in the motion picture industry. Journal of Cultural Economy, 22, 249-270.Allen, R. C. (1985). The movies in vaudeville: Historical context of the movies as popular entertainment. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 57-82). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Anderson, C. (1994). Hollywood TV: The studio system in the fifties. Austin: University of Texas Press.Anderson, C. (2004). Television and Hollywood in the 1940s. In T. Schatz (Ed.), Hollywood: Critical concepts in media and cultural studies (Vol. 1, pp. 227-254). London: Routledge.Anderson, P. (1976). Considerations on Western Marxism. London: NLB.Anderson, P. (1984). In the tracks of historical materialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Anderson, R. (1985). The motion picture patents company: A reevaluation. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 133-152). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Arriaga, P. (1984). On advertising: A Marxist critique. Media, Culture and Society, 6, 53-64.Austin, B. A. (1985). The development and decline of the drive-in movie theater. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current research in film: audiences, economics, and law (Vol. 1, pp. 59-91). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corp.Austin, B. A. (1990). Home video: The second-run "Theater" of the 1990s. In T. Balio (Ed.), Hollywood in the age of television (pp. 319-349). Boston: Unwin Hyman.Ayer, D., Bates, R. E., & Herman, P. J. (1982). Self-censorship in the movie industry: A historical perspective on law and social change. In G. Kindem (Ed.), The American movie industry: The business of motion pictures (pp. 215-250). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Baker, W. E., & Faulkner, R. R. (1991). Role as resource in the Hollywood film industry. American Journal of Sociology, 97(2), 279-309.Bakir, E., & Campbell, A. (2006). The effect of neoliberalism on the fall in the rate of profit in business cycles. Review of Radical Political Economics, 38(3), 365-373.Bakker, G. (2005a). America`s master: The European film industry in the United States, 1907-1920. In J. Sedgwick & M. Pokorny (Eds.), An economic history of film (pp. 24-47). New York: Routledge.Bakker, G. (2005b). The decline and fall of the European film industry: Sunk costs, market size, and market structure, 1890–1927. The Economic History Review, 58(2), 310-351.Balio, T. (1985a). A novelty spawns small businesses, 1894-1908. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (pp. 3-26). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Balio, T. (1985b). Struggles to control, 1908-1930. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 103-131). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Balio, T. (1985c). A mature oligopoly, 1930-1948. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 253-284). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Balio, T. (1985d). Retrenchment, reappraisal, and reorganization, 1948-. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (pp. 401-447). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Balio, T. (1990). Introduction to Part I: Responding to network television. In T. Balio (Ed.), Hollywood in the age of television (pp. 3-40). Boston: Unwin Hyman.Balio, T. (Ed.). (1995). Grand design: Hollywood as a modern business enterprise, 1930-1939. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Baron, C. (2004). Crafting film performances: Acting in the Hollywood studio era. In P. R. Wojcik (Ed.), Movie acting: The film reader (pp. 83-94). New York: Routledge.Baudrillard, J. (1981). For a critique of the political economy of the sign (C. Levin, Trans.). St. Louis, MO.: Telos Press.Baughman, J. L. (1990). The weakest chain and the strongest link: The American broadcasting company and the motion picture industry, 1952-60. In T. Balio (Ed.), Hollywood in the Age of Television (pp. 91-114). Boston: Unwin Hyman.Belton, J. (1992). Widescreen cinema. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Belton, J. (2002). Spectator and screen. In G. A. Waller (Ed.), Moviegoing in America: A sourcebook in the history of ilm exhibition (pp. 238-246). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Belton, J. (2009). American cinema/American culture (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Bermejo, F. (2009). Audience manufacture in historical perspective: From broadcasting to Google. New Media & Society, 11(1&2), 133-154.Bernstein, M. (1988). Hollywood martyrdoms: Joan of Arc and independent production in the late 1940s. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current research in film: Audiences , economics, and law (Vol. 4, pp. 89-113). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Pub.Bernstein, M. (2004). Hollywood`s semi-independent production. In T. Schatz (Ed.), Hollywood: Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies (Vol. I, pp. 181-194). London: Routledge.Bettig, R. V. (2002). The Frankfurt School and the political economy of communications. In J. T. Nealon & C. Irr (Eds.), Rethinking the Frankfurt School: Alternative legacies of cultural critique (pp. 81-94). Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.Bettig, R. V. (2008). Hollywood and intellectual property. In P. McDonald & J. Wasko (Eds.), The contemporary Hollywood film industry (pp. 193-205). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Pub.Blume, S. E. (2006). The revenues streams: An overview. In J. E. Squire (Ed.), The movie business book (3rd ed., pp. 332-359). Berkshire, UK: Oper University Press.Boddy, W. (1990). Building the world`s largest advertising medium: CBS and television, 1940-60. In T. Balio (Ed.), Hollywood in the age of television (pp. 63-89). Boston: Unwin Hyman, Inc.Boddy, W. (2004). The studios move into prime time: Hollywood and the television industry in the 1950s. In T. Schatz (Ed.), Hollywood: Critical concepts in media and cultural studies (Vol. 1, pp. 255-282). London: Routledge.Body, R., & Crotty, J. (1975). Class conflict and macro-policy: The political business cycle. Review of Radical Political Economics, 7(1), 1-19.Bordwell, D., Staiger, J., & Thompson, K. (1985). The classical Hollywood cinema : Film style & mode of production to 1960. New York: Columbia University Press.Bowser, E. (1994). The transformation of cinema, 1907-1915. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Brenner, R., & Glick, M. (1991). The regulation approach: Theory and history. New Left Review, 188, 45-119.Brown, L. (1996). Technology transforms. In L. S. Gray & R. L. Seeber (Eds.), Under the stars: Essays on labor relations in arts and entertainment (pp. 51-85). New York: ILR Press.Burawoy, M., & Wright, E. O. (2002). Sociological Marxism. In J. H. Turber (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 459-486). New York: Kluwer.Calabrese, A. (2004). Toward a political economy of culture. In A. Calabrese & C. Sparks (Eds.), Toward a political economy of culture: Capitalism and communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 1-12). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Callinicos, A. (1987). Making history: Agency, structure, and change in social theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Cantor, M. G., & Cantor, J. M. (1992). Prime-time television: Content and control (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Cassady Jr., R.(1959). Monopoly in motion picture production and distribution, 1908-1915. Southern Californian Law Review, 32, 325-390. Ceplair, L. (2008). The base and superstructure debate in the Hollywood Communist Party. Science & Society, 72(3), 319-348.Chambers, R. W. (1938). The double feature as a sales problem. Harvard Business Review, 16(2), 226-236. Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Christopherson, S. (1996). Flexibility and adaption in industrial relations: The exceptional case of the US media entertainments industries. In L. S. Gray & R. L. Seeber (Eds.), Under the stars: Essays on labor relations in arts and entertainment (pp. 86-112). Ithaca, N. Y. : ILR Press.Christopherson, S. (2008). Labor: The effects of media concentration on the film and television workforce. In P. McDonald & J. Wasko (Eds.), The contemporary Hollywood film industry (pp. 155-166). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Pub.Christopherson, S. (2009). Working in the creative economy: Risk, adaptation, and the persistence of exclusionary networks. In A. McKinlay & C. Smith (Eds.), Creative labour: Working in the creative industries (pp. 72-90). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Christopherson, S., & Rightor, N. (2010). The creative economy as "big business": Evaluating state strategies to lure filmmakers. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29(3), 336-352.Christopherson, S., & Storper, M. (1989). The effects of flexible specialization on industrial politics and the labour market: the motion picture industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 42(3), 331-347.Cogoy, M. (1973). The fall in the rate of profit and the theory of accumulation. BCSE(winter), 52-67.Conant, M. (1978). Antitrust in the motion picture industry: Economic and legal analysis (Reprint ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Conant, M. (1982). The Paramount Decrees reconsidered. Law and Contemporary Problems, 44(4), 79-107.Cook, D. A. (2000). Lost illusions: American cinema in the shadow of Watergate and Vietnam, 1970-1979 (Vol. 9). New York: Charles Scribner`s Sons.Corner, J. (1998). Studying media: Problems of theory and method. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Counter, J. N. (1996). Key issues facing producers and distributors in the motion picture and television producers. In L. S. Gray & R. L. Seeber (Eds.), Under the stars: Essays on labor relations in arts and entertainment (pp. vii-ix). London: Cornell University Press.Curran, J. (2002). Media and power. London: Routledge.Curran, J. (2004). The rise of the Westminster School. In A. Calabrese & C. Sparks (Eds.), Toward a political economy of culture : Capitalism and communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 13-40). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Curran, J., & Seaton, J. (1991). Power without responsibility: The press and broadcasting in Britain (4th ed.). London: Roultedge.de Vries, H. (2012, February 22). Tinseltown, ghost town. New York Times, p. A27. deCordova, R. (1991). The emergence of the star system in America. In C. Gledhill (Ed.), Stardom: Industry of desire (pp. 17-29). London: Routledge.DeVany, A. (2004). Hollywood economics: How extreme uncertainty shapes the film industry. London: Routledge.DeVany, A., & Walls, W. D. (1999). Uncertainty in the movie industry: Does star power reduce the terror at the box office? Journal of Cultural Economics, 23, 285-318.Dominick, J. R. (1987). Film economics and film content: 1964-1983. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current research in film: Audiences, economics, and law (Vol. 3, pp. 136-153). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corp.Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (1993). The economics of the profit rate: Competition, crises, and historical tendencies in capitalism. Aldershot, England: Edward Elgar.Edgerton, G. R. (1983). American film exhibition and an analysis of the motion picture industry`s market structure, 1963-1980. New York: Garland.Eliashberg, J., & Shugan, S. M. (1997). Film critics: Influencers or predictors? Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 68-78.Eliashberg, J., Elberse, A., & Leenders, M. A. A. M. (2006). The motion picture industry: Critical issues in practice, current research, and new research directions. Marketing Science, 25(6), 638-661.Ellis, J. C. (1995). A history of film (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Elster, J. (1985). Making sense of Marx. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Faulkner, R. R., & Anderson, A. B. (1987). Short-term projects and emergent careers: Evidence from Hollywood. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 879-909.Fine, B., & Harris, L. (1976). Controversial issues in Marxist economic theory. Socialist Register, 13, 141-178.Finler, J. W. (2003). The Hollywood story (3rd ed.). New York: Crown.Finler, J. W. (1992). The Hollywood story (2nd ed.). New York: Crown.Freeman, A. (2010). Marxism without Marx: A note towards a critique. Capital and Class, 34(1), 84-97.Fuchs, C. (2009). Information and communication technologies and society: A contribution to the critique of the political economy of the internet. European Journal of Communication 24(1), 69-87.Fuchs, C. (2012). Google capitalism. TripleC, 10(1), 42-48.Fulton, A. R. (1985). The machine. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 27-42). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Gandy, O. H. (1988). The political economy of communications competence. In V. Mosco & J. Wasko (Eds.), The political economy of information (pp. 108-124). Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.Gandy, O. H. (2007). Privatization and identity: The formation of a racial class. In G. Murdock & J. Wasko (Eds.), Media in the age of marketization (pp. 109-128). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Garnham, N. (1990). Capitalism and Communication: Global Culture and the Economics of Information. London: Sage.Gitlin, T. (2000). Inside prime time (Rev. ed.). Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Glyn, A., & Sutcliffe, B. (1972). British capitalism, workers and the profit squeeze. London: Penguin Books.Goettler, R. L., & Leslie, P. (2005). Cofinancing to manage risk in the motion picture industry. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(2), 231-261.Golding, P., & Murdock, G. (1991). Culture, communications, and political economy. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 15-32). London: Edward Arnold.Gomery, D. (1979). Hollywood, the National Recovery Administration, and the question of monopoly power. Journal of the University Film Association, 31(2), 47-52.Gomery, D. (1979a). The movies become big business: Publix theatres and the chain store strategy. Cinema Journal, 18(2), 26-40.Gomery, D. (1979b). Hollywood, the National Recovery Administration, and the question of monopoly power. Journal of the University Film Association, 31(2), 47-52.Gomery, D. (1983). Television, Hollywood, and the development of movies made for television. In E. A. Kaplan (Ed.), Regarding television: Critical approaches-an anthology (pp. 120-129). Frederick, MD.: University Publications of America.Gomery, D. (1984). Failed opportunities: The integration of the U.S. motion picture and television industries. Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 9(3), 219-228.Gomery, D. (1985). The coming of sound: Technological change in the American film industry. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 229-251). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Gomery, D. (1985). The coming of television and the `lost` motion picture audience. Journal of Film and Video, 38(3), 5-11.Gomery, D. (1986). The Hollywood studio system. New York: St. Martins Press.Gomery, D. (1992). Shared pleasure: A History of movie presentation in the United States. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.Gomery, D. (2000). Motion picture exhibition in 1970s America. In D. A. Cook (Ed.), Lost illusions: American cinema in the shadow of Watergate and Vietnam, 1970-1979 (Vol. 9, pp. 397-416). New York: Charles Scribner`s Sons.Gomery, D., & Pafort-Overduin, C. (2011). Movie history: A survey (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Grainge, P., Jancovich, M., & Monteith, S. (2007). Film histories: An introduction and reader. Edinburgh, UK: Ediburgh University Press.Guback, T. H. (1969). The international film industry: Western Europe and america since 1945. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Guback, T. H. (1982). Film as a international business: The role of the American multinationals. In G. Kindem (Ed.), The American movie industry (pp.??). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Guback, T. H. (1987). Government financial support to the film industry in the United States. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current research in film: Audiences, economics, and law (Vol. 3, pp. 88-104). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corp.Guback, T. H. (1988). Capital, labor power, and the identity of film. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current research in film: Audiences, economics, and law (Vol. 5, pp. 126-134). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Guback, T. H., & Dombkowski, D. J. (1976). Television and Hollywood: Economic relations in the 1970s. Journal of Broadcasting, 20(4), 511-527.Hall, S. (2006). Blockbusters in the 1970s. In L. R. Williams & M. Hammond (Eds.), Contemporary American cinema (pp. 164-183). London: Open University Press.Halsey, Stuart & Co. (1927/1985). The motion picture industry as a basis for bond financing. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 195-217). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Hampton, B. (1970). History of the American film industry: From its beginning to 1931. New York: Dover.Hanssen, F. A. (2005). Revenue sharing and the coming of sound. In J. Sedgwick & M. Pokorny (Eds.), An economic history of film (pp. 86-120). London: Routledge.Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Hendricks, G. (1985). The history of the Kinetoscope. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 43-56). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Hesmondhalgh, D. (2002). The cultural industries. London: Sage.Hodgson, G. (1974). Marxist epistemology and the transformation problem. Economy and Society, 3(4), 357-392.Hoyt, E. (2010). Hollywood and the income tax, 1929-1955. Film History, 22(1), 5-21.Huettig, M. D. (1985). Economic control of the motion picture industry. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 285-310). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Izod, J. (1988). Hollywood and the box office, 1895-1986. New York: Columbia University Press.Jacob, L. (1975). The rise of the American film. New York: Teachers College Press.Jacobs, L. (1975). The rise of the American film. New York: Teachers College Press.Jacobs, L. (1992). The B film and the problem of cultural distinction. Screen, 31(1), 1-13.Kapsis, R. E. (1991). Hollywood and the production of culture perspective. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current research in film: Audiences, economics, and law (Vol. 5, pp. 68-85). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corp. Kapusinski, A. T. (1981). Business cycle fluctuations and the motion picture industry: A study of contracyclical activity. (Ph.D thesis). New York University, New York.Kepley, V. Jr. (1990). From "Frontal Lobes" to the "Bob-and-Bob" show: NBC management and programming strategies, 1949-65. In T. Balio (Ed.), Hollywood in the Age of Television (pp. 41-61). Boston: Unwin Hyman.Kliman, A. (2010). Appearance and essence: Neoliberalism, financialization, and the underlying crisis of capitalist production. Paper presented at the The Economic Crisis and Left Responses. Kliman, A., & McGlone, T. (1988). The transformation non-problem and the non-transformation problem. Capital & Class, 12(2), 56-84.Koszarski, R. (1990). An evening`s entertainment: The age of the silent feature picture, 1915-1928. N.Y.: Scribner and Sons.Lafferty, W. (1990). Feature films on prime-time. In T. Balio (Ed.), Hollywood in the Age of Television (pp. 235-256). Boston: Unwin Hyman.Lebowitz, M. A. (1976). Marx`s falling rate of profit: A dialectical view. Canadian Journal of Economics, 9(2), 232-264.Lebowitz, M. A. (1986). Too many blindspots on the media. Studies in Political Economy, 21, 165-173.Lebowitz, M. A. (1994). Analytical Marxism and the Marxian theory of crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18(2), 163-179.Lev, P. (2003). Transforming the screen, 1950-1959 (Vol. 7). New York: Charles Scribner`s Sons.Lindstrom, P. B. (1989). Home video: The consumer impact. In L. Mark R (Ed.), The VCR age: Home video and mass communication (pp. 40-49). Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.Lipschutz, R. D. (2010). Political economy, capitalism, and popular culture. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Litman, B. R. (1983). Predicting success of theatrical movies: An empirical study. Journal of Popular Culture, 16(4), 159-175.Litman, B. R. (1998). The motion picture mega-industry. Boston, Mass.: Allyn and Bacon.Litman, B. R., & Kohl, L. S. (1989). Predicting financial success of motion pictures: the `80s experience. Journal of Media Economics, 2(2), 35-50.Londoner, D. J. (1985). The changing economics of entertainment. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 603-630). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Lucarelli, B. (2010). Marxian theories of money, credit and crisis. Capital and Class, 34(2), 199-214.Maltby, R. (2003). Hollywood cinema (2nd ed.). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Pub.Maxwell, R. (2006). Political economy within cultural studies. In T. Miller (Ed.), A companion to cultural studies (pp. 116-138). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Mayer, D. (1999). Acting in silent film: Which legacy of the theatre? In P. Kramer & A. Lovell (Eds.), Screen acting (pp. 10-30). New York: Routledge.McChesney, R. W. (2004). Making a molehill out of a mountain:The sad state of political economy in U.S. media studies. In A. Calabrese & C. Sparks (Eds.), Toward a political economy of culture: Capitalism and communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 41-64). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.McDonald, A. H. (2006). Through the looking glass: Runaway productions and "Hollywood Economics". Journal of Labor and Employment Law,, 9(4), 879-949.McDonald, P. (2000). The Star system: Hollywood`s production of popular identities. London: Wallflower Press.McDonald, P. (2008). The star system: The production of Hollywood stardom in the post-studio era. In P. McDonald & J. Wasko (Eds.), The contemporary Hollywood film industry (pp. 167-181). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Pub.Meehan, E. R. (1986). Conceptualizing culture as commodity: The problem of television. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 3, 448-457.Meehan, E. R. (2000). Leisure of labor? Fan ethnography and political economy. In I. Hagen & J. Wasko (Eds.), Consuming audiences? Production and reception in media research (pp. 71-92). Cresskill, NJ.: Hampton Press, Inc.Meehan, E. R. (2002). Gendering the commodity audience: Critical media research, feminism, and political economy. In E. R. M. E. Riordan (Ed.), Sex & Money: Feminism and political economy in the media (pp. 209-222). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Merritt, R. (1985). Nickeldeon theaters, 1905-1914: Building an audience for the movies. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American Film Industry (Revised ed., pp. 83-102). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Miège, B. (1989). The capitalization of cultural production. New York: International General.Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. (1996). The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Holywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 519-543.Miller, T. (2005). Hollywood, cultural policy citadel. In M. Wayne (Ed.), Understanding film: Marxist perspectives (pp. 182-193). London: Pluto Press.Miller, T. (2007). Global Hollywood 2010. International Journal of Communication, 1, 1-4.Miller, T., Govil, N., McMurria, J., & Maxwell, R. (2001). Global Hollywood. London: British Film Institute.Miller, T., Govil, N., McMurria, J., Maxwell, R., & Wang, T. (2005). Global Hollywood 2. London: British Film Institute.Miller, T., govil, N., McMurria, J., Maxwell, R., & Wang, T. (2005). Global Hollywood 2. London: British Film Institute.Monaco, P. (2001). The sixties, 1960-1969 (Vol. 8). New York: Charles Scribner`s Sons.Monitor Company (1999). U.S. Runaway Film and Television Study Report. Santa Monica[CA.]: Monitor Company.Mosco, V. (1998). Political economy, communication, and labor. In G. Sussman & J. A. Lent (Eds.), Global productions labor inthe making of the " information society" (pp. 13-38). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press Inc.Mosco, V. (2009). The political economy of communication (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Moul, C. C., & Shugan, S. M. (2005). Theatrical release and the launching of motion pictures. In C. C. Moul (Ed.), A concise handbook of movie industry economics (pp. 80-137). London: Cambridge University Press.MPAA. (2006). US entertainment industry: 2005 MPA market statistics: MPAA.MPAA. (2009). 2008 theatrical market statistics.MPAA. (2011). Theatrical market statistics.Murdock, G. (1978). Blindspots about Western Marxism:A reply to Dallas Smythe. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 2(2), 109–119.Murray, L. L. (1977). Complacency, competition, and cooperation: The film industry responds to the challenge of television. Journal of Popular Film, 6(1), 47-70.Musser, C. (1994). The emergence of cinema: The American screen to 1907 (Vol. 1). Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Musser, C. (1996). Pre-classical American cinema: Its changing modes of production. In R. Abel (Ed.), Silent film (pp. 85-108). New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Musser, C. (2004). The creation of the film actor. In P. R. Wojcik (Ed.), Movie acting: The film reader (pp. 51-58). New York: Routledge.Nelson, D. M. (1947). The independent producer. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 254, 49-57.Nielsen, M. (1983). Toward a workers` history of the U.S. film industry. In V. Mosco & J. Wasko (Eds.), The critical communications review Volume I: Labor, the working class, and the media (pp. 47-83). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Nielsen, M. C. (1988). Labor power and organization in the early U.S. motion picture industry. Film History, 2, 121-131.Paul, A., & Kleingartner, A. (1994). Flexible production and the transformation of industrial relations in the motion picture and television industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47(4), 663-678.Paul, A., & Kleingartner, A. (1996). The transformation of industrial relations in the motion picture and television industries: Talent sector. In L. S. Gray & R. L. Seeber (Eds.), Under the stars: Essays on labor relations in arts and entertainment (pp. 156-180). London: Cornell University Press.Pendakur, M. (1990). Canadian dreams and American control : The political economy of the Canadian film industry. Detroit, Mich.: Wayne State University Press.Pendakur, M. (1998). Hollywood north: Film and TV production in Canada. In G. Sussman & J. A. Lent (Eds.), Global productions: Labor in the making of the "information society" (pp. 213-238). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.Perelman, M. (1987). Marx`s crises theory: Scarcity, labor, and finance. New York: Greenwood Press.Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The second industrial divide : Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Potts, N. (2011). Marx and the crisis. Capital & Class, 35(3), 455-473.Prince, S. (2000). A new pot of gold: Hollywood under the electronic rainbow, 1980-1989 (Vol. 10). New York: Charles Scribner`s Sons.Prindle, D. F. (1988). Politics of glamour: Ideology & democracy in the Screen Actors Guild. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press.Pryluck, C. (1986). Industrialization of entertainment in the United States. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current research in film: audiences, economics, and law (Vol. 2, pp. 117-135). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corp.Randle, K., & Culkin, N. (2009). Getting in and getting on in Hollywood: Freelenace careers in an uncertain industry. In A. McKinlay & C. Smith (Eds.), Creative labour: Working in the creative industries. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Ravid, S. A. (1999). Information, blockbusters, and stars: A study of the film industry. Journal of Business, 72(4), 463-492.Ravid, S. A. (1999). Information, blockbusters, and stars: A study of the film industry. Journal of Business, 72(4), 463-492.Roemer, J. E. (1979). Continuing controversy on the falling rate of profit: Fixed capital and other issues. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3(4), 379-398.Roemer, J. E. (1982). A general theory of exploitation and class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Rosenzweig, R. (2002). From rum shop to rialto: Workers and movies. In G. A. Waller (Ed.), Moviegoing in America: A sourcebook in the history of film exhibition (pp. 27-45). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Ross, M. (1947). Labor relations in Hollywood. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 254, 58-64.Ryan, B. (1991). Making capital from culture: The corporate form of capitalist cultural production. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Sayer, D. (1979). Marx`s method: Ideology, science and critique in Capital. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.Schatz, T. (1997). Boom and bust: The American cinema in the 1940s (Vol. 6). New York: Charles Scribner`s Sons.Schatz, T. (1998). The genius of the system: Hollywood film-making in the studio era. London: Faber and Faber.Schatz, T. (2004). The new Hollywood. In T. Schatz (Ed.), Hollywood: Critical concepts in media and cultural studies (Vol. 1, pp. 285-314). London: Routledge.Schatz, T. (2008). The studio system and conglomerate Hollywood. In P. McDonald & J. Wasko (Eds.), The contemporary Hollywood film industry (pp. 13-42). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Pub.Schiller, S. I. (2002). The relationship between motion picture distribution and exhibition: An analysis of the effects of anti-blind-bidding legislation. In I. R. Hark (Ed.), Exhibition, the film reader (pp. 107-122). London: Routledge.Schulze, L. (1990). The made-for-TV movie: Industrial practice, cultural form, popular reception. In T. Balio (Ed.), Hollywood in the Age of Television (pp. 351-375). Boston: Unwin Hyman.Scott, A. J. (2005). On Hollywood: The place, the industry. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Segrave, K. (1997). American films abroad: Hollywood`s domination of the world`s movie screens from the 1890s to the present. Jefferson, N.C.: Mcfarland & Co Inc Pub.Shaikh, A. (1978). An introduction to the history of crisis theories. In U. o. R. P. E. Staff (Ed.), U.S. capitalism in crisis (pp. 219-241). New York: URPE Monthly Review Press.Shiel, M. (2006a). American cinema, 1965-70. In L. R. Williams & M. Hammond (Eds.), Contemporary American cinema (pp. 12-40). London: Open University Press.Shiel, M. (2006b). American cinema, 1970-75. In L. R. Williams & M. Hammond (Eds.), Contemporary American cinema (pp. 124-163). London: Open University Press.Shindler, C. (1996). Hollywood in crisis: Cinema and American society, 1929-1939. London: Routledge.Singer, B. (1995). Banhattan nickelodeons: New data on audiences and exhibitors. Cinema Journal, 34(3), 5-35.Sklar, R. (1975). Movie-made America. New York: Vintage.Slide, A. (1994). Early American cinema (Revised ed.). Metuchen, N.J.: The Scarecrow Press.Smith, S. P., & Smith, V. K. (1986). Successful movies: A preliminary empirical analysis. Applied Economics, 18(5), 501-507.Smythe, D. (1977). Communications: Blindspot on Western Marxism. Canadian Journal of Political & Social Theory, 1(3), 1-27.Smythe, D. (1981). Dependency road: Communications, capitalism, consciousness, and Canada. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Pub.Staiger, J. (1981). The Hollywood mode of production. University of Wisconsin, Madison.Staiger, J. (1982). Dividing labor for production control: Thomas Ince and the rise of the sutido system. In G. Kindem (Ed.), The American movie industry: The business of motion pictures (pp. 94-103). Chapel Hill: Southern Illinois University Press.Staiger, J. (1983a). Individualism versus collectivism. Screen, 24(4-5).Staiger, J. (1983b). "Tame" authors and the corporate laboratory: Stories, writers, and scenarios in Hollywood. Quarterly Review of Film Studies, 8(4), 33-45.Staiger, J. (1985). Blueprints for feature films: Hollywood`s continuity scripts. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 173-194). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Staiger, J. (1986). Mass-produced photoplays: Economic and signifying practices in the first years of Hollywood. In P. Kerr (Ed.), The Hollywood Film Industry (pp. 97-119). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Staiger, J. (1994). Introduction. In J. Staiger (Ed.), The studio system (pp. 1-14). New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Storper, M. (1989). The transition to flexible specialization in the U.S. film industry: External economies, the division of labor, and the crossing of industrial divides. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 13(2), 273-305.Storper, M. (1993). Flexible specialization in Hollywood: A reply to Aksoy and Robins. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 17(4), 479-484.Storper, M. (1994). The transition to flexible specialisation in the US film industry: External economies, the division of labour and the crossing of industrial divides. In A. Amin (Ed.), Post-Fordism: A reader (pp. 195-226). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Stuart, F. (1982). The effects of television ont he motion picture industry: 1948-1960. In G. Kindem (Ed.), The American movie industry: The business of motion pictures (pp. 257-307). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Taves, B. (1995). The B film: Hollywood`s other half. In T. Balio (Ed.), Grand design: Hollywood as a modern business enterprise, 1930-1939 (pp. 313-350). Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Thompson, K. (1985). Exporting entertainment: America in the world film market 1907-1934. London: BFI.Vogel, H. L. (1998). Entertainment industry economics: A guide for financial analysis (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Vogel, H. L. (2007). Entertainment industry economics: A guide for financial analysis (7th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Walker, A. (1970). Stardom: The Hollywood phenomenon. New York: Stein and Day.Wasko, J. (1981). The political economy of the American film industry. Media, Culture & Society, 3(2), 135-153.Wasko, J. (1982). Movies and money : Financing the American film industry. Norwood, N.J.: ABLEX Pub. Corp.Wasko, J. (1983). Trade unions and broadcasting: A case study of the National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians. In V. Mosco & J. Wasko (Eds.), The critical communications review, Volume I: Labor, the working class, and the media (Vol. I, pp. 85-113). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Wasko, J. (1995). Hollywood in the information age: Beyond the silver screen. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Wasko, J. (1998). Challenges to Hollywood`s labor force in the 1990s. In G. Sussman & J. A. Lent (Eds.), Global productions: Labor in the making of the "information society" (pp. 173-189). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.Wasko, J. (2001). Understanding Disney: The manufacture of fantasy. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.Wasko, J. (2003). Hollywood and television in the 1950s: The roots of diversification. In P. Lev (Ed.), Transforming the screen, 1950-1959 (Vol. 7, pp. 127-146). New York: Charles Scribner`s Sons.Wasko, J. (2003). How Hollywood works. London: Sage.Wasko, J. (2004). Show me the money: Challenging Hollywood economics. In A. Calabrese & C. Sparks (Eds.), Toward a political economy of culture : Capitalism and communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 131-150). Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Wasko, J. (2005a). Critiquing Hollywood: The political economy of motion pictures. In C. C. Moul (Ed.), A concise handbook of movie industry economics (pp. 5-31). New York: Cambridge University Press.Wasko, J. (2005b). Studying the political economy of media and information. Comunicação e Sociedade, 7, 25-48Wasko, J. (2008). Financing and production: Creating the Hollywood film commodity. In P. McDonald & J. Wasko (Eds.), The contemporary Hollywood film industry (pp. 43-62). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Pub.Wasko, J. (2011). The death of Hollywood: Exaggeration or reality. In J. Wasko, G. Murdock & H. Sousa (Eds.), The handbook of political economy of communications (pp. 307-330). Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.Wasko, J., Phillips, M., & Purdie, C. (1993). Hollywood meets Madison Avenue.: The commercialization of US films. Media, Culture & Society, 15(2), 271-293.Wasser, F. (2001). Veni, vidi, video: The Hollywood empire and the VCR. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Wasser, F. (2008). Ancillary markets - Video and DVD: Hollywood retools. In P. McDonald & J. Wasko (Eds.), The contemporary Hollywood film industry (pp. 120-142). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Pub.Waterman, D. (1990). Diversity of quality of information products in a monopolistically competitive industry. Information Economics and Policy, 4, 291-303.Waterman, D. (2005). Hollywood`s road to riches. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Wayne, M. (2003). Marxism and media studies: Key concepts and contemporary trends. London: Pluto Press.Weeks, J. (1982). Equilibrium, uneven development and the tendency of the rate of profit to fall. Capital and Class, 16, 62-77.Weinberg, C. B. (2005). Profits out of the picture. In C. C. Moul (Ed.), A concise handbook of movie industry economics (pp. 163-197). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Weinstein, M. (1998). Profit-sharing contracts in Hollywood: Evolution and analysis. Journal of Legal Studies, 27, 67-112.Weiss, P. R., & Faulkner, R. R. (1983). Credits and craft production: Freelance social organization in the Hollywood film industry, 1964-1978. Symbolic Interaction, 6(1), 111-123.Weisskopf, T. E. (1979). Marxian crisis theory and the rate of profit in the postwar U.S. economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3(4), 341-378.White, T. R. (1990). Hollywood`s attempt at appropriating television: The case of Paramount Pictures. In T. Balio (Ed.), Hollywood in the Age of Television (pp. 145-163). Boston: Unwin Hyman.Whitney, S. N. (1982). Antitrust policies and the motion picture industry. In G. Kindem (Ed.), The American movie industry: The business of motion pictures (pp. 161-204). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Winston, B. (1998). Media technology and society, a History: From the telegraph to the internet. London: BFI.Wolff, R. D., & Resnick, S. A. (1987). Economics: Marxian versus neoclassical. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Wright, E. O. (1975). Alternative perspectives in the Marxist theory of accumulation and crisis. The Insurgent Sociologist, 6(1), 5-39.Wright, E. O. (1979). The value controversy and social research. In I. Steedman, P. Sweezy, S. Mohun & A. Shaikh (Eds.), Value controversy (pp. 37-74). London: New Left Books.Wyatt, J. (1994). High concept: Movies and marketing in Hollywood. Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press.Wyatt, J. (1998). The formation of the `major independent`: Miramax, New Line and the New Hollywood. In S. Neale & M. Smith (Eds.), Contemporary Hollywood Cinema (pp. 74-90). London: Routledge.Wyatt, J. (2000). Independents, packaging, and inflationary pressure in 1980s Hollywood. In S. Prince (Ed.), A new pot of gold: Hollywood under the electronic rainbow, 1980-1989 (pp. 142-159). New York: Scribner`s. 描述 博士
國立政治大學
新聞研究所
94451501
100資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094451501 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 馮建三 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Feng, Chien San en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 張時健 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chang, Shih Chen en_US dc.creator (作者) 張時健 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chang, Shih Chen en_US dc.date (日期) 2011 en_US dc.date.accessioned 30-Oct-2012 14:20:23 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 30-Oct-2012 14:20:23 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 30-Oct-2012 14:20:23 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0094451501 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54898 - dc.description (描述) 博士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 新聞研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 94451501 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 100 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 美國的少數幾家大型影視產業資本不僅主導了境內市場，也在全球市場占有領先的份額，因而對美國影視產業的批判經常出自於反壟斷、反帝反傾銷的動機，目的在保護民族市場或多元文化。然而美國是最早讓動態影像（motion picture）商業化、產業化，使資本能藉之積累擴張，而不必由政府以長期固定的財政手段支持的少數國家之一；並且不同於大量進口產品與技術的後進國，美國很早就成為影視產品的淨出口國，同時在傳播科技與生產手段上持續革新，一至如今。藉由探索美國影視產業的發展史，有助於我們理解影視產業資本的運動軌跡；也就是探討在影視產業內，資本如何剝奪剩餘價值、發達生產力、擴大生產規模的政治經濟歷程。一般而言，個別資本為擴大利潤率而不斷地更新生產技術以提升生產力，長期卻總體地導致利潤率下降的結果。或說資本運動具有周期性：按利潤率的波動，一再地經歷危機、蕭條、復甦、高漲的循環。美國影視產業史已經說明了這些階段，然而利潤率如何變遷，以及相應生產手段的更替、生產關係的變革，還有待釐清。藉長時段的國民所得與生產帳（National Income and Product Account, NIPA）以及產業稅務報告所登錄的資料，本文得到 1947年至1997年間電影業前後一貫可比較的利潤率計算根據。資料顯示，二十世紀下半的美國電影利潤率幾經波動，長期有明顯下降的趨勢。按Weisskopf所提的利潤率要項拆解法，就各周期利潤率作進一步分析，可知戰後利潤率轉壞主因為市場萎縮減產，七○年後利潤率轉壞則因為工資上升與資本投入過速的效果。在回顧美國電影業百年來的流通手段與生產過程歷程後，與利潤率變遷材料與分析結果互為理解，可知晚近利潤率轉壞的主因為資本仰賴少數廠外秀異生產者，使對生產者的工資議價力降低。與早年的量產制相較，這是資本解散廠內長聘勞動隊伍，使生產外部化造成的非意圖後果。為突破量產時代的生產力發展瓶頸，資本逐漸集中到少量差異化的高質量特製電影製作上，以爭取更深更廣的流通，實現更高的利潤份額，同時節省量產所需的人力。長期下來造成資本的兩極分配，使勞動者的晉升、流動乃至於再生產出現困難。資本因應秀異者高工資的利潤擠壓以及勞動者再生產困難的困局，是藉全球化之便作生產外逃，使產業空洞化。除了取他國低廉勞動力與製作補貼的外因以解釋晚近美國電影業深化全球分工的格局，本文試圖提供長時段資本運動的內因，作為理解當代全球好萊塢構造的另一途徑。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) A few giant corporations dominate US domestic motion picture market and also play key roles in global markets. So people who criticize this situations are usually motivated by goals of anti-monopoly, anti-imperialist or anti-dumping and want to protect their own national market or pluralistic culture. However, motion pictures in US have been commercialized and traded for capital accumulation and expansion since their birth. Not like other countries` governments give stable financial support to their movie and TV industries, US motion picture industry seldom received government direct supports and US has been major exporter of video goods and new communication technology after 1910s. By exploring the history of motion picture industry we would understand the capital movement of this industry. In other words, we need to identify the political economic process of capital exploits video goods, occupies surplus value, and promotes the innovation of technology and expansion.Generally speaking, individual capital renews production technology and upgrades productivity for higher rate of profit while makes macro/total profit rate falling in the long run. It is said that the movement of capital is cyclic and production would experiences phases like crisis, recessionary, recovery, and upswing. We could identify these phases in the history of US motion picture industry, but we didn`t know exactly how and why profit rate fluctuated and the mode of production, relation of production changed correspondingly.I collected raw data from National Income and Product Account published by Bureau of Economic Analysis and corporation tax reports published by Internal Revenue System which were calculated for for profit rate of motion picture industry from 1947 to 1997. The result shows that the rate of profit falling in the long run. And I used Weisskopf`s method to analysis the factors of profit rate and have conclusions that the first falling rate of profit after 2nd world war was caused by market shrinking and the second one was caused by rising wage and organic composition of capital. By reviewing the history of US motion picture industry, especially the process of means of circulation and production changed, then comparing the history with trend of profit rate, I argue that the main reason of falling rate in last decades is stronger bargaining power of a few elite talents who asked for ultra-high compensations. When capital faced shrinking market and tried to saved normal cost by dismissing lots of in-house labour and production outsourcing, it could not help but rely "free" workers and accepted unexpected high wages while more and more fund and resources were concentrated on fewer and fewer production projects. A few ultra-high quality films which circulate more widely and deeply would realize more profit and save labour cost for capital. But in the long run this would polarize capital using and make upgrading, mobility and reproduction of labour more difficult. Furthermore, the accumulation of capital is difficult too as profit rate falling.Capital responded to this plight by production runaway. This is the main issue of Global Hollywood. Besides the factors of cheaper labour or subsidies from foreign governments, I try to argue the inner logic of capital movement would lead the same result. That`s why global Hollywood globalized. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論：現象與提問......................................p.0011.1 危機現象作為提問的起點..................................p.0011.2 論文架構................................................p.004第二章 理論與文獻：傳播政治經濟學再出發......................p.0052.1 傳播政治經濟學的研究傳統................................p.0052.2 傳播政治經濟學的電影研究................................p.0092.3 所謂資本主義經濟體制：一般論............................p.0112.4 利潤、利潤率下降與資本主義經濟體制：馬克思主義觀點......p.0142.5 利潤率與生產體制的變遷..................................p.0222.6 小結：研究的問題意識....................................p.026第三章 研究方法與資料來源....................................p.0273.1 產出與工資..............................................p.0283.2 資本投入存量............................................p.0333.3 其餘資料來源............................................p.034第四章 資本對電影的想像與利用：電影作為商品的演進史（上）....p.0354.1 影像從屬於工業資本......................................p.0354.2 轉型：工業資本的退位....................................p.0394.3 生產擴張：商品與市場的變形..............................p.0414.4 向垂直整合的壟斷構造過渡................................P.0454.5 租金制變革..............................................p.0504.6 小結....................................................p.053第五章 資本對電影的想像與利用：電影作為商品的演進史（下）....p.0545.1 突破利潤實現的地理束縛：無線電視的興起..................p.0545.2 電影業與電視業的競爭格局................................p.0585.3 危機及克服：確認電視網作為新映演通路....................p.0625.4 付費通路的展開：有線付費頻道與家庭錄影帶................p.0665.5 小結....................................................p.073第六章 由內而外：生產的發達與變遷（上）......................p.0756.1 分工的發展與完成........................................p.0756.2 片廠體系：規畫與執行者分離的管理制......................p.0806.3 量中求變：生產的二重構造與轉化..........................p.0846.4 小結....................................................p.090第七章 由內而外：生產的發達與變遷（下）......................p.0927.1 市場萎縮造成的清算、減產與生產外逃......................p.0927.2 轉進電視事業............................................p.0957.3 生產關係重組：外部化與彈性組建製作案....................p.0997.4 新好萊塢：當代構造......................................p.1027.5 小結....................................................p.106第八章 利潤率變動及其成因....................................p.1088.1 電影業商品的抽象規定....................................p.1088.2 利潤率及利潤（剩餘價值）的構成..........................p.1128.3 利潤率周期..............................................p.1168.4 生產外部化的效果........................................p.1218.5 小結....................................................p.126第九章 結論..................................................p.1279.1 摘要：由利潤率趨勢再理解電影業生產體制轉型..............p.1279.2 利潤率下降但生產擴張？..................................p.1319.3 提議：我們為什麼要反對資本主義..........................p.1379.4 研究限制與展望..........................................p.139附錄一 全美電影業毛附加價值及其購成..........................p.141附錄二 電影業資產構成........................................p.144參考書目 ......................................................p.145 zh_TW dc.language.iso en_US - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094451501 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 美國影視產業 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 馬克思主義 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資本積累 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 利潤率下降趨勢 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 生產模式 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) US motion picture industry en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Marxism en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Accumulation of capital en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Tendency of the rate of profit to fall en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Mode of production en_US dc.title (題名) 電影內容作為商品的歷史過程及其利潤分析: 以好萊塢為核心的研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The history of commoditization of motion picture and profit rate: The case of Hollywood en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬克思（1975〉。《資本論：政治經濟學批判》。第三卷。北京：人民出版社。劉明遠（2009）。《馬克思主義經濟危機和周期理論的結構與變遷》。北京：中國人民大學出版社。Aksoy, A., & Robins, K. (1992). Hollywood for the 21th century: global competition for critical mass in image market. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 16(1), 1-22.Albert, S. (1998). Movie stars and the distribution of financially successful films in the motion picture industry. Journal of Cultural Economy, 22, 249-270.Allen, R. C. (1985). The movies in vaudeville: Historical context of the movies as popular entertainment. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 57-82). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Anderson, C. (1994). Hollywood TV: The studio system in the fifties. Austin: University of Texas Press.Anderson, C. (2004). Television and Hollywood in the 1940s. In T. Schatz (Ed.), Hollywood: Critical concepts in media and cultural studies (Vol. 1, pp. 227-254). London: Routledge.Anderson, P. (1976). Considerations on Western Marxism. London: NLB.Anderson, P. (1984). In the tracks of historical materialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Anderson, R. (1985). The motion picture patents company: A reevaluation. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 133-152). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Arriaga, P. (1984). On advertising: A Marxist critique. Media, Culture and Society, 6, 53-64.Austin, B. A. (1985). The development and decline of the drive-in movie theater. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current research in film: audiences, economics, and law (Vol. 1, pp. 59-91). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corp.Austin, B. A. (1990). Home video: The second-run "Theater" of the 1990s. In T. Balio (Ed.), Hollywood in the age of television (pp. 319-349). Boston: Unwin Hyman.Ayer, D., Bates, R. E., & Herman, P. J. (1982). Self-censorship in the movie industry: A historical perspective on law and social change. In G. Kindem (Ed.), The American movie industry: The business of motion pictures (pp. 215-250). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Baker, W. E., & Faulkner, R. R. (1991). Role as resource in the Hollywood film industry. American Journal of Sociology, 97(2), 279-309.Bakir, E., & Campbell, A. (2006). The effect of neoliberalism on the fall in the rate of profit in business cycles. Review of Radical Political Economics, 38(3), 365-373.Bakker, G. (2005a). America`s master: The European film industry in the United States, 1907-1920. In J. Sedgwick & M. Pokorny (Eds.), An economic history of film (pp. 24-47). New York: Routledge.Bakker, G. (2005b). The decline and fall of the European film industry: Sunk costs, market size, and market structure, 1890–1927. The Economic History Review, 58(2), 310-351.Balio, T. (1985a). A novelty spawns small businesses, 1894-1908. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (pp. 3-26). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Balio, T. (1985b). Struggles to control, 1908-1930. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 103-131). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Balio, T. (1985c). A mature oligopoly, 1930-1948. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 253-284). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Balio, T. (1985d). Retrenchment, reappraisal, and reorganization, 1948-. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (pp. 401-447). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Balio, T. (1990). Introduction to Part I: Responding to network television. In T. Balio (Ed.), Hollywood in the age of television (pp. 3-40). Boston: Unwin Hyman.Balio, T. (Ed.). (1995). Grand design: Hollywood as a modern business enterprise, 1930-1939. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Baron, C. (2004). Crafting film performances: Acting in the Hollywood studio era. In P. R. Wojcik (Ed.), Movie acting: The film reader (pp. 83-94). New York: Routledge.Baudrillard, J. (1981). For a critique of the political economy of the sign (C. Levin, Trans.). St. Louis, MO.: Telos Press.Baughman, J. L. (1990). The weakest chain and the strongest link: The American broadcasting company and the motion picture industry, 1952-60. In T. Balio (Ed.), Hollywood in the Age of Television (pp. 91-114). Boston: Unwin Hyman.Belton, J. (1992). Widescreen cinema. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Belton, J. (2002). Spectator and screen. In G. A. Waller (Ed.), Moviegoing in America: A sourcebook in the history of ilm exhibition (pp. 238-246). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Belton, J. (2009). American cinema/American culture (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Bermejo, F. (2009). Audience manufacture in historical perspective: From broadcasting to Google. New Media & Society, 11(1&2), 133-154.Bernstein, M. (1988). Hollywood martyrdoms: Joan of Arc and independent production in the late 1940s. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current research in film: Audiences , economics, and law (Vol. 4, pp. 89-113). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Pub.Bernstein, M. (2004). Hollywood`s semi-independent production. In T. Schatz (Ed.), Hollywood: Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies (Vol. I, pp. 181-194). London: Routledge.Bettig, R. V. (2002). The Frankfurt School and the political economy of communications. In J. T. Nealon & C. Irr (Eds.), Rethinking the Frankfurt School: Alternative legacies of cultural critique (pp. 81-94). Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.Bettig, R. V. (2008). Hollywood and intellectual property. In P. McDonald & J. Wasko (Eds.), The contemporary Hollywood film industry (pp. 193-205). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Pub.Blume, S. E. (2006). The revenues streams: An overview. In J. E. Squire (Ed.), The movie business book (3rd ed., pp. 332-359). Berkshire, UK: Oper University Press.Boddy, W. (1990). Building the world`s largest advertising medium: CBS and television, 1940-60. In T. Balio (Ed.), Hollywood in the age of television (pp. 63-89). Boston: Unwin Hyman, Inc.Boddy, W. (2004). The studios move into prime time: Hollywood and the television industry in the 1950s. In T. Schatz (Ed.), Hollywood: Critical concepts in media and cultural studies (Vol. 1, pp. 255-282). London: Routledge.Body, R., & Crotty, J. (1975). Class conflict and macro-policy: The political business cycle. Review of Radical Political Economics, 7(1), 1-19.Bordwell, D., Staiger, J., & Thompson, K. (1985). The classical Hollywood cinema : Film style & mode of production to 1960. New York: Columbia University Press.Bowser, E. (1994). The transformation of cinema, 1907-1915. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Brenner, R., & Glick, M. (1991). The regulation approach: Theory and history. New Left Review, 188, 45-119.Brown, L. (1996). Technology transforms. In L. S. Gray & R. L. Seeber (Eds.), Under the stars: Essays on labor relations in arts and entertainment (pp. 51-85). New York: ILR Press.Burawoy, M., & Wright, E. O. (2002). Sociological Marxism. In J. H. Turber (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 459-486). New York: Kluwer.Calabrese, A. (2004). Toward a political economy of culture. In A. Calabrese & C. Sparks (Eds.), Toward a political economy of culture: Capitalism and communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 1-12). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Callinicos, A. (1987). Making history: Agency, structure, and change in social theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Cantor, M. G., & Cantor, J. M. (1992). Prime-time television: Content and control (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Cassady Jr., R.(1959). Monopoly in motion picture production and distribution, 1908-1915. Southern Californian Law Review, 32, 325-390. Ceplair, L. (2008). The base and superstructure debate in the Hollywood Communist Party. Science & Society, 72(3), 319-348.Chambers, R. W. (1938). The double feature as a sales problem. Harvard Business Review, 16(2), 226-236. Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Christopherson, S. (1996). Flexibility and adaption in industrial relations: The exceptional case of the US media entertainments industries. In L. S. Gray & R. L. Seeber (Eds.), Under the stars: Essays on labor relations in arts and entertainment (pp. 86-112). Ithaca, N. Y. : ILR Press.Christopherson, S. (2008). Labor: The effects of media concentration on the film and television workforce. In P. McDonald & J. Wasko (Eds.), The contemporary Hollywood film industry (pp. 155-166). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Pub.Christopherson, S. (2009). Working in the creative economy: Risk, adaptation, and the persistence of exclusionary networks. In A. McKinlay & C. Smith (Eds.), Creative labour: Working in the creative industries (pp. 72-90). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Christopherson, S., & Rightor, N. (2010). The creative economy as "big business": Evaluating state strategies to lure filmmakers. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29(3), 336-352.Christopherson, S., & Storper, M. (1989). The effects of flexible specialization on industrial politics and the labour market: the motion picture industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 42(3), 331-347.Cogoy, M. (1973). The fall in the rate of profit and the theory of accumulation. BCSE(winter), 52-67.Conant, M. (1978). Antitrust in the motion picture industry: Economic and legal analysis (Reprint ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Conant, M. (1982). The Paramount Decrees reconsidered. Law and Contemporary Problems, 44(4), 79-107.Cook, D. A. (2000). Lost illusions: American cinema in the shadow of Watergate and Vietnam, 1970-1979 (Vol. 9). New York: Charles Scribner`s Sons.Corner, J. (1998). Studying media: Problems of theory and method. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Counter, J. N. (1996). Key issues facing producers and distributors in the motion picture and television producers. In L. S. Gray & R. L. Seeber (Eds.), Under the stars: Essays on labor relations in arts and entertainment (pp. vii-ix). London: Cornell University Press.Curran, J. (2002). Media and power. London: Routledge.Curran, J. (2004). The rise of the Westminster School. In A. Calabrese & C. Sparks (Eds.), Toward a political economy of culture : Capitalism and communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 13-40). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Curran, J., & Seaton, J. (1991). Power without responsibility: The press and broadcasting in Britain (4th ed.). London: Roultedge.de Vries, H. (2012, February 22). Tinseltown, ghost town. New York Times, p. A27. deCordova, R. (1991). The emergence of the star system in America. In C. Gledhill (Ed.), Stardom: Industry of desire (pp. 17-29). London: Routledge.DeVany, A. (2004). Hollywood economics: How extreme uncertainty shapes the film industry. London: Routledge.DeVany, A., & Walls, W. D. (1999). Uncertainty in the movie industry: Does star power reduce the terror at the box office? Journal of Cultural Economics, 23, 285-318.Dominick, J. R. (1987). Film economics and film content: 1964-1983. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current research in film: Audiences, economics, and law (Vol. 3, pp. 136-153). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corp.Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (1993). The economics of the profit rate: Competition, crises, and historical tendencies in capitalism. Aldershot, England: Edward Elgar.Edgerton, G. R. (1983). American film exhibition and an analysis of the motion picture industry`s market structure, 1963-1980. New York: Garland.Eliashberg, J., & Shugan, S. M. (1997). Film critics: Influencers or predictors? Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 68-78.Eliashberg, J., Elberse, A., & Leenders, M. A. A. M. (2006). The motion picture industry: Critical issues in practice, current research, and new research directions. Marketing Science, 25(6), 638-661.Ellis, J. C. (1995). A history of film (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Elster, J. (1985). Making sense of Marx. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Faulkner, R. R., & Anderson, A. B. (1987). Short-term projects and emergent careers: Evidence from Hollywood. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 879-909.Fine, B., & Harris, L. (1976). Controversial issues in Marxist economic theory. Socialist Register, 13, 141-178.Finler, J. W. (2003). The Hollywood story (3rd ed.). New York: Crown.Finler, J. W. (1992). The Hollywood story (2nd ed.). New York: Crown.Freeman, A. (2010). Marxism without Marx: A note towards a critique. Capital and Class, 34(1), 84-97.Fuchs, C. (2009). Information and communication technologies and society: A contribution to the critique of the political economy of the internet. European Journal of Communication 24(1), 69-87.Fuchs, C. (2012). Google capitalism. TripleC, 10(1), 42-48.Fulton, A. R. (1985). The machine. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 27-42). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Gandy, O. H. (1988). The political economy of communications competence. In V. Mosco & J. Wasko (Eds.), The political economy of information (pp. 108-124). Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.Gandy, O. H. (2007). Privatization and identity: The formation of a racial class. In G. Murdock & J. Wasko (Eds.), Media in the age of marketization (pp. 109-128). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Garnham, N. (1990). Capitalism and Communication: Global Culture and the Economics of Information. London: Sage.Gitlin, T. (2000). Inside prime time (Rev. ed.). Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Glyn, A., & Sutcliffe, B. (1972). British capitalism, workers and the profit squeeze. London: Penguin Books.Goettler, R. L., & Leslie, P. (2005). Cofinancing to manage risk in the motion picture industry. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(2), 231-261.Golding, P., & Murdock, G. (1991). Culture, communications, and political economy. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 15-32). London: Edward Arnold.Gomery, D. (1979). Hollywood, the National Recovery Administration, and the question of monopoly power. Journal of the University Film Association, 31(2), 47-52.Gomery, D. (1979a). The movies become big business: Publix theatres and the chain store strategy. Cinema Journal, 18(2), 26-40.Gomery, D. (1979b). Hollywood, the National Recovery Administration, and the question of monopoly power. Journal of the University Film Association, 31(2), 47-52.Gomery, D. (1983). Television, Hollywood, and the development of movies made for television. In E. A. Kaplan (Ed.), Regarding television: Critical approaches-an anthology (pp. 120-129). Frederick, MD.: University Publications of America.Gomery, D. (1984). Failed opportunities: The integration of the U.S. motion picture and television industries. Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 9(3), 219-228.Gomery, D. (1985). The coming of sound: Technological change in the American film industry. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 229-251). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Gomery, D. (1985). The coming of television and the `lost` motion picture audience. Journal of Film and Video, 38(3), 5-11.Gomery, D. (1986). The Hollywood studio system. New York: St. Martins Press.Gomery, D. (1992). Shared pleasure: A History of movie presentation in the United States. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.Gomery, D. (2000). Motion picture exhibition in 1970s America. In D. A. Cook (Ed.), Lost illusions: American cinema in the shadow of Watergate and Vietnam, 1970-1979 (Vol. 9, pp. 397-416). New York: Charles Scribner`s Sons.Gomery, D., & Pafort-Overduin, C. (2011). Movie history: A survey (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Grainge, P., Jancovich, M., & Monteith, S. (2007). Film histories: An introduction and reader. Edinburgh, UK: Ediburgh University Press.Guback, T. H. (1969). The international film industry: Western Europe and america since 1945. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Guback, T. H. (1982). Film as a international business: The role of the American multinationals. In G. Kindem (Ed.), The American movie industry (pp.??). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Guback, T. H. (1987). Government financial support to the film industry in the United States. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current research in film: Audiences, economics, and law (Vol. 3, pp. 88-104). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corp.Guback, T. H. (1988). Capital, labor power, and the identity of film. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current research in film: Audiences, economics, and law (Vol. 5, pp. 126-134). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Guback, T. H., & Dombkowski, D. J. (1976). Television and Hollywood: Economic relations in the 1970s. Journal of Broadcasting, 20(4), 511-527.Hall, S. (2006). Blockbusters in the 1970s. In L. R. Williams & M. Hammond (Eds.), Contemporary American cinema (pp. 164-183). London: Open University Press.Halsey, Stuart & Co. (1927/1985). The motion picture industry as a basis for bond financing. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 195-217). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Hampton, B. (1970). History of the American film industry: From its beginning to 1931. New York: Dover.Hanssen, F. A. (2005). Revenue sharing and the coming of sound. In J. Sedgwick & M. Pokorny (Eds.), An economic history of film (pp. 86-120). London: Routledge.Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Hendricks, G. (1985). The history of the Kinetoscope. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 43-56). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Hesmondhalgh, D. (2002). The cultural industries. London: Sage.Hodgson, G. (1974). Marxist epistemology and the transformation problem. Economy and Society, 3(4), 357-392.Hoyt, E. (2010). Hollywood and the income tax, 1929-1955. Film History, 22(1), 5-21.Huettig, M. D. (1985). Economic control of the motion picture industry. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 285-310). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Izod, J. (1988). Hollywood and the box office, 1895-1986. New York: Columbia University Press.Jacob, L. (1975). The rise of the American film. New York: Teachers College Press.Jacobs, L. (1975). The rise of the American film. New York: Teachers College Press.Jacobs, L. (1992). The B film and the problem of cultural distinction. Screen, 31(1), 1-13.Kapsis, R. E. (1991). Hollywood and the production of culture perspective. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current research in film: Audiences, economics, and law (Vol. 5, pp. 68-85). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corp. Kapusinski, A. T. (1981). Business cycle fluctuations and the motion picture industry: A study of contracyclical activity. (Ph.D thesis). New York University, New York.Kepley, V. Jr. (1990). From "Frontal Lobes" to the "Bob-and-Bob" show: NBC management and programming strategies, 1949-65. In T. Balio (Ed.), Hollywood in the Age of Television (pp. 41-61). Boston: Unwin Hyman.Kliman, A. (2010). Appearance and essence: Neoliberalism, financialization, and the underlying crisis of capitalist production. Paper presented at the The Economic Crisis and Left Responses. Kliman, A., & McGlone, T. (1988). The transformation non-problem and the non-transformation problem. Capital & Class, 12(2), 56-84.Koszarski, R. (1990). An evening`s entertainment: The age of the silent feature picture, 1915-1928. N.Y.: Scribner and Sons.Lafferty, W. (1990). Feature films on prime-time. In T. Balio (Ed.), Hollywood in the Age of Television (pp. 235-256). Boston: Unwin Hyman.Lebowitz, M. A. (1976). Marx`s falling rate of profit: A dialectical view. Canadian Journal of Economics, 9(2), 232-264.Lebowitz, M. A. (1986). Too many blindspots on the media. Studies in Political Economy, 21, 165-173.Lebowitz, M. A. (1994). Analytical Marxism and the Marxian theory of crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18(2), 163-179.Lev, P. (2003). Transforming the screen, 1950-1959 (Vol. 7). New York: Charles Scribner`s Sons.Lindstrom, P. B. (1989). Home video: The consumer impact. In L. Mark R (Ed.), The VCR age: Home video and mass communication (pp. 40-49). Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.Lipschutz, R. D. (2010). Political economy, capitalism, and popular culture. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Litman, B. R. (1983). Predicting success of theatrical movies: An empirical study. Journal of Popular Culture, 16(4), 159-175.Litman, B. R. (1998). The motion picture mega-industry. Boston, Mass.: Allyn and Bacon.Litman, B. R., & Kohl, L. S. (1989). Predicting financial success of motion pictures: the `80s experience. Journal of Media Economics, 2(2), 35-50.Londoner, D. J. (1985). The changing economics of entertainment. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 603-630). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Lucarelli, B. (2010). Marxian theories of money, credit and crisis. Capital and Class, 34(2), 199-214.Maltby, R. (2003). Hollywood cinema (2nd ed.). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Pub.Maxwell, R. (2006). Political economy within cultural studies. In T. Miller (Ed.), A companion to cultural studies (pp. 116-138). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Mayer, D. (1999). Acting in silent film: Which legacy of the theatre? In P. Kramer & A. Lovell (Eds.), Screen acting (pp. 10-30). New York: Routledge.McChesney, R. W. (2004). Making a molehill out of a mountain:The sad state of political economy in U.S. media studies. In A. Calabrese & C. Sparks (Eds.), Toward a political economy of culture: Capitalism and communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 41-64). New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.McDonald, A. H. (2006). Through the looking glass: Runaway productions and "Hollywood Economics". Journal of Labor and Employment Law,, 9(4), 879-949.McDonald, P. (2000). The Star system: Hollywood`s production of popular identities. London: Wallflower Press.McDonald, P. (2008). The star system: The production of Hollywood stardom in the post-studio era. In P. McDonald & J. Wasko (Eds.), The contemporary Hollywood film industry (pp. 167-181). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Pub.Meehan, E. R. (1986). Conceptualizing culture as commodity: The problem of television. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 3, 448-457.Meehan, E. R. (2000). Leisure of labor? Fan ethnography and political economy. In I. Hagen & J. Wasko (Eds.), Consuming audiences? Production and reception in media research (pp. 71-92). Cresskill, NJ.: Hampton Press, Inc.Meehan, E. R. (2002). Gendering the commodity audience: Critical media research, feminism, and political economy. In E. R. M. E. Riordan (Ed.), Sex & Money: Feminism and political economy in the media (pp. 209-222). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Merritt, R. (1985). Nickeldeon theaters, 1905-1914: Building an audience for the movies. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American Film Industry (Revised ed., pp. 83-102). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Miège, B. (1989). The capitalization of cultural production. New York: International General.Miller, D., & Shamsie, J. (1996). The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Holywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 519-543.Miller, T. (2005). Hollywood, cultural policy citadel. In M. Wayne (Ed.), Understanding film: Marxist perspectives (pp. 182-193). London: Pluto Press.Miller, T. (2007). Global Hollywood 2010. International Journal of Communication, 1, 1-4.Miller, T., Govil, N., McMurria, J., & Maxwell, R. (2001). Global Hollywood. London: British Film Institute.Miller, T., Govil, N., McMurria, J., Maxwell, R., & Wang, T. (2005). Global Hollywood 2. London: British Film Institute.Miller, T., govil, N., McMurria, J., Maxwell, R., & Wang, T. (2005). Global Hollywood 2. London: British Film Institute.Monaco, P. (2001). The sixties, 1960-1969 (Vol. 8). New York: Charles Scribner`s Sons.Monitor Company (1999). U.S. Runaway Film and Television Study Report. Santa Monica[CA.]: Monitor Company.Mosco, V. (1998). Political economy, communication, and labor. In G. Sussman & J. A. Lent (Eds.), Global productions labor inthe making of the " information society" (pp. 13-38). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press Inc.Mosco, V. (2009). The political economy of communication (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Moul, C. C., & Shugan, S. M. (2005). Theatrical release and the launching of motion pictures. In C. C. Moul (Ed.), A concise handbook of movie industry economics (pp. 80-137). London: Cambridge University Press.MPAA. (2006). US entertainment industry: 2005 MPA market statistics: MPAA.MPAA. (2009). 2008 theatrical market statistics.MPAA. (2011). Theatrical market statistics.Murdock, G. (1978). Blindspots about Western Marxism:A reply to Dallas Smythe. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 2(2), 109–119.Murray, L. L. (1977). Complacency, competition, and cooperation: The film industry responds to the challenge of television. Journal of Popular Film, 6(1), 47-70.Musser, C. (1994). The emergence of cinema: The American screen to 1907 (Vol. 1). Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Musser, C. (1996). Pre-classical American cinema: Its changing modes of production. In R. Abel (Ed.), Silent film (pp. 85-108). New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Musser, C. (2004). The creation of the film actor. In P. R. Wojcik (Ed.), Movie acting: The film reader (pp. 51-58). New York: Routledge.Nelson, D. M. (1947). The independent producer. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 254, 49-57.Nielsen, M. (1983). Toward a workers` history of the U.S. film industry. In V. Mosco & J. Wasko (Eds.), The critical communications review Volume I: Labor, the working class, and the media (pp. 47-83). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Nielsen, M. C. (1988). Labor power and organization in the early U.S. motion picture industry. Film History, 2, 121-131.Paul, A., & Kleingartner, A. (1994). Flexible production and the transformation of industrial relations in the motion picture and television industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47(4), 663-678.Paul, A., & Kleingartner, A. (1996). The transformation of industrial relations in the motion picture and television industries: Talent sector. In L. S. Gray & R. L. Seeber (Eds.), Under the stars: Essays on labor relations in arts and entertainment (pp. 156-180). London: Cornell University Press.Pendakur, M. (1990). Canadian dreams and American control : The political economy of the Canadian film industry. Detroit, Mich.: Wayne State University Press.Pendakur, M. (1998). Hollywood north: Film and TV production in Canada. In G. Sussman & J. A. Lent (Eds.), Global productions: Labor in the making of the "information society" (pp. 213-238). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.Perelman, M. (1987). Marx`s crises theory: Scarcity, labor, and finance. New York: Greenwood Press.Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The second industrial divide : Possibilities for prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Potts, N. (2011). Marx and the crisis. Capital & Class, 35(3), 455-473.Prince, S. (2000). A new pot of gold: Hollywood under the electronic rainbow, 1980-1989 (Vol. 10). New York: Charles Scribner`s Sons.Prindle, D. F. (1988). Politics of glamour: Ideology & democracy in the Screen Actors Guild. Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press.Pryluck, C. (1986). Industrialization of entertainment in the United States. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current research in film: audiences, economics, and law (Vol. 2, pp. 117-135). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corp.Randle, K., & Culkin, N. (2009). Getting in and getting on in Hollywood: Freelenace careers in an uncertain industry. In A. McKinlay & C. Smith (Eds.), Creative labour: Working in the creative industries. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Ravid, S. A. (1999). Information, blockbusters, and stars: A study of the film industry. Journal of Business, 72(4), 463-492.Ravid, S. A. (1999). Information, blockbusters, and stars: A study of the film industry. Journal of Business, 72(4), 463-492.Roemer, J. E. (1979). Continuing controversy on the falling rate of profit: Fixed capital and other issues. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3(4), 379-398.Roemer, J. E. (1982). A general theory of exploitation and class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Rosenzweig, R. (2002). From rum shop to rialto: Workers and movies. In G. A. Waller (Ed.), Moviegoing in America: A sourcebook in the history of film exhibition (pp. 27-45). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Ross, M. (1947). Labor relations in Hollywood. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 254, 58-64.Ryan, B. (1991). Making capital from culture: The corporate form of capitalist cultural production. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Sayer, D. (1979). Marx`s method: Ideology, science and critique in Capital. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.Schatz, T. (1997). Boom and bust: The American cinema in the 1940s (Vol. 6). New York: Charles Scribner`s Sons.Schatz, T. (1998). The genius of the system: Hollywood film-making in the studio era. London: Faber and Faber.Schatz, T. (2004). The new Hollywood. In T. Schatz (Ed.), Hollywood: Critical concepts in media and cultural studies (Vol. 1, pp. 285-314). London: Routledge.Schatz, T. (2008). The studio system and conglomerate Hollywood. In P. McDonald & J. Wasko (Eds.), The contemporary Hollywood film industry (pp. 13-42). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Pub.Schiller, S. I. (2002). The relationship between motion picture distribution and exhibition: An analysis of the effects of anti-blind-bidding legislation. In I. R. Hark (Ed.), Exhibition, the film reader (pp. 107-122). London: Routledge.Schulze, L. (1990). The made-for-TV movie: Industrial practice, cultural form, popular reception. In T. Balio (Ed.), Hollywood in the Age of Television (pp. 351-375). Boston: Unwin Hyman.Scott, A. J. (2005). On Hollywood: The place, the industry. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Segrave, K. (1997). American films abroad: Hollywood`s domination of the world`s movie screens from the 1890s to the present. Jefferson, N.C.: Mcfarland & Co Inc Pub.Shaikh, A. (1978). An introduction to the history of crisis theories. In U. o. R. P. E. Staff (Ed.), U.S. capitalism in crisis (pp. 219-241). New York: URPE Monthly Review Press.Shiel, M. (2006a). American cinema, 1965-70. In L. R. Williams & M. Hammond (Eds.), Contemporary American cinema (pp. 12-40). London: Open University Press.Shiel, M. (2006b). American cinema, 1970-75. In L. R. Williams & M. Hammond (Eds.), Contemporary American cinema (pp. 124-163). London: Open University Press.Shindler, C. (1996). Hollywood in crisis: Cinema and American society, 1929-1939. London: Routledge.Singer, B. (1995). Banhattan nickelodeons: New data on audiences and exhibitors. Cinema Journal, 34(3), 5-35.Sklar, R. (1975). Movie-made America. New York: Vintage.Slide, A. (1994). Early American cinema (Revised ed.). Metuchen, N.J.: The Scarecrow Press.Smith, S. P., & Smith, V. K. (1986). Successful movies: A preliminary empirical analysis. Applied Economics, 18(5), 501-507.Smythe, D. (1977). Communications: Blindspot on Western Marxism. Canadian Journal of Political & Social Theory, 1(3), 1-27.Smythe, D. (1981). Dependency road: Communications, capitalism, consciousness, and Canada. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Pub.Staiger, J. (1981). The Hollywood mode of production. University of Wisconsin, Madison.Staiger, J. (1982). Dividing labor for production control: Thomas Ince and the rise of the sutido system. In G. Kindem (Ed.), The American movie industry: The business of motion pictures (pp. 94-103). Chapel Hill: Southern Illinois University Press.Staiger, J. (1983a). Individualism versus collectivism. Screen, 24(4-5).Staiger, J. (1983b). "Tame" authors and the corporate laboratory: Stories, writers, and scenarios in Hollywood. Quarterly Review of Film Studies, 8(4), 33-45.Staiger, J. (1985). Blueprints for feature films: Hollywood`s continuity scripts. In T. Balio (Ed.), The American film industry (Revised ed., pp. 173-194). Madison, Wis.: The University of Wisconsin Press.Staiger, J. (1986). Mass-produced photoplays: Economic and signifying practices in the first years of Hollywood. In P. Kerr (Ed.), The Hollywood Film Industry (pp. 97-119). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Staiger, J. (1994). Introduction. In J. Staiger (Ed.), The studio system (pp. 1-14). New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Storper, M. (1989). The transition to flexible specialization in the U.S. film industry: External economies, the division of labor, and the crossing of industrial divides. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 13(2), 273-305.Storper, M. (1993). Flexible specialization in Hollywood: A reply to Aksoy and Robins. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 17(4), 479-484.Storper, M. (1994). The transition to flexible specialisation in the US film industry: External economies, the division of labour and the crossing of industrial divides. In A. Amin (Ed.), Post-Fordism: A reader (pp. 195-226). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Stuart, F. (1982). The effects of television ont he motion picture industry: 1948-1960. In G. Kindem (Ed.), The American movie industry: The business of motion pictures (pp. 257-307). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Taves, B. (1995). The B film: Hollywood`s other half. In T. Balio (Ed.), Grand design: Hollywood as a modern business enterprise, 1930-1939 (pp. 313-350). Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Thompson, K. (1985). Exporting entertainment: America in the world film market 1907-1934. London: BFI.Vogel, H. L. (1998). Entertainment industry economics: A guide for financial analysis (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Vogel, H. L. (2007). Entertainment industry economics: A guide for financial analysis (7th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Walker, A. (1970). Stardom: The Hollywood phenomenon. New York: Stein and Day.Wasko, J. (1981). The political economy of the American film industry. Media, Culture & Society, 3(2), 135-153.Wasko, J. (1982). Movies and money : Financing the American film industry. Norwood, N.J.: ABLEX Pub. Corp.Wasko, J. (1983). Trade unions and broadcasting: A case study of the National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians. In V. Mosco & J. Wasko (Eds.), The critical communications review, Volume I: Labor, the working class, and the media (Vol. I, pp. 85-113). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Wasko, J. (1995). Hollywood in the information age: Beyond the silver screen. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Wasko, J. (1998). Challenges to Hollywood`s labor force in the 1990s. In G. Sussman & J. A. Lent (Eds.), Global productions: Labor in the making of the "information society" (pp. 173-189). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.Wasko, J. (2001). Understanding Disney: The manufacture of fantasy. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.Wasko, J. (2003). Hollywood and television in the 1950s: The roots of diversification. In P. Lev (Ed.), Transforming the screen, 1950-1959 (Vol. 7, pp. 127-146). New York: Charles Scribner`s Sons.Wasko, J. (2003). How Hollywood works. London: Sage.Wasko, J. (2004). Show me the money: Challenging Hollywood economics. In A. Calabrese & C. Sparks (Eds.), Toward a political economy of culture : Capitalism and communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 131-150). Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Wasko, J. (2005a). Critiquing Hollywood: The political economy of motion pictures. In C. C. Moul (Ed.), A concise handbook of movie industry economics (pp. 5-31). New York: Cambridge University Press.Wasko, J. (2005b). Studying the political economy of media and information. Comunicação e Sociedade, 7, 25-48Wasko, J. (2008). Financing and production: Creating the Hollywood film commodity. In P. McDonald & J. Wasko (Eds.), The contemporary Hollywood film industry (pp. 43-62). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Pub.Wasko, J. (2011). The death of Hollywood: Exaggeration or reality. In J. Wasko, G. Murdock & H. Sousa (Eds.), The handbook of political economy of communications (pp. 307-330). Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.Wasko, J., Phillips, M., & Purdie, C. (1993). Hollywood meets Madison Avenue.: The commercialization of US films. Media, Culture & Society, 15(2), 271-293.Wasser, F. (2001). Veni, vidi, video: The Hollywood empire and the VCR. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Wasser, F. (2008). Ancillary markets - Video and DVD: Hollywood retools. In P. McDonald & J. Wasko (Eds.), The contemporary Hollywood film industry (pp. 120-142). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Pub.Waterman, D. (1990). Diversity of quality of information products in a monopolistically competitive industry. Information Economics and Policy, 4, 291-303.Waterman, D. (2005). Hollywood`s road to riches. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Wayne, M. (2003). Marxism and media studies: Key concepts and contemporary trends. London: Pluto Press.Weeks, J. (1982). Equilibrium, uneven development and the tendency of the rate of profit to fall. Capital and Class, 16, 62-77.Weinberg, C. B. (2005). Profits out of the picture. In C. C. Moul (Ed.), A concise handbook of movie industry economics (pp. 163-197). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Weinstein, M. (1998). Profit-sharing contracts in Hollywood: Evolution and analysis. Journal of Legal Studies, 27, 67-112.Weiss, P. R., & Faulkner, R. R. (1983). Credits and craft production: Freelance social organization in the Hollywood film industry, 1964-1978. Symbolic Interaction, 6(1), 111-123.Weisskopf, T. E. (1979). Marxian crisis theory and the rate of profit in the postwar U.S. economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3(4), 341-378.White, T. R. (1990). Hollywood`s attempt at appropriating television: The case of Paramount Pictures. In T. Balio (Ed.), Hollywood in the Age of Television (pp. 145-163). Boston: Unwin Hyman.Whitney, S. N. (1982). Antitrust policies and the motion picture industry. In G. Kindem (Ed.), The American movie industry: The business of motion pictures (pp. 161-204). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Winston, B. (1998). Media technology and society, a History: From the telegraph to the internet. London: BFI.Wolff, R. D., & Resnick, S. A. (1987). Economics: Marxian versus neoclassical. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Wright, E. O. (1975). Alternative perspectives in the Marxist theory of accumulation and crisis. The Insurgent Sociologist, 6(1), 5-39.Wright, E. O. (1979). The value controversy and social research. In I. Steedman, P. Sweezy, S. Mohun & A. Shaikh (Eds.), Value controversy (pp. 37-74). London: New Left Books.Wyatt, J. (1994). High concept: Movies and marketing in Hollywood. Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press.Wyatt, J. (1998). The formation of the `major independent`: Miramax, New Line and the New Hollywood. In S. Neale & M. Smith (Eds.), Contemporary Hollywood Cinema (pp. 74-90). London: Routledge.Wyatt, J. (2000). Independents, packaging, and inflationary pressure in 1980s Hollywood. In S. Prince (Ed.), A new pot of gold: Hollywood under the electronic rainbow, 1980-1989 (pp. 142-159). New York: Scribner`s. zh_TW
