| dc.contributor | 國立政治大學法律學系 | en_US |
| dc.contributor | 行政院國家科學委員會 | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 林良榮 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2012 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 26-Nov-2012 09:38:59 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 26-Nov-2012 09:38:59 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 26-Nov-2012 09:38:59 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/55959 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 當代國家基於對職業風險(occupational risk)之治理所制定的公共衛生政策，勞工職災保護制度已是國家藉以規制、保護勞工之身體健康的一種重要手段。而就風險治理之模式，通常主要包括事前之「預防」與事後之「制裁」，而其中後者之制裁手段當然還包括對當事人勞工因權利所受損害之填補(修復)乃至於相當金額的補償(行政)或賠償(民事)。從受災之勞工權利保護的角度觀之，職災的認定以及職災的補償(賠償)是當代職災風險治理制度的建構上，勞(勞工)資(雇主)政(國家)三者對於此一制度如何該當於「治理理性」(governmentality)的爭執所在。此一治理之方式之爭執乃涉及國家對於職災法律保障政策之制定，亦在於國家對於受災的勞工給予何種法律上保護程度之政治決定。因此，職災風險治理之形成，無異是指職災風險之下位治理領域所屬之各種法律政策建構的一個政治過程。本子計畫之研究以「過勞」及「精神壓力」所導致之職災為研究素材，透過台日韓之國際比較研究，針對職災發生後國家與勞資雙方當事人之相關權利義務規範的法形成與法實踐所建構之法律治理(技術)體制進行分析，尤其是職災認定與職災賠償(含補償)的定義/規範之形成與司法/行政之操作，藉以探究職災風險之治理理性於法律體制之鑲嵌、發展與限制，並嘗試說明我國未來過勞職災之法律政策發展上應有的方向。 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Modern countries establish public health policies and protective mechanism of the occupational hazards for occupational risk as critical strategies to regulate and protect the health and safety of the labors. Based on the model of occupational risk management, it may include prevention of the hazards and punishments on the failure of protection. The punishments may involve both administrative and civil compensations for the victims under occupational hazards. From the perspective of protecting victims’ rights and safety, the concept of governmentality was the essence while the employers, labors, and governmental agency debating on the recognition of and compensation for occupational hazards. The concept of governmentality reflects how a government establishing a legal protective mechanism and the degree of its care toward labors. The formation of the occupational risk management is a political process for the construction of the legal policies. This study focused on the issue of overwork occupational hazard.While comparing the laws dealing with occupational hazards in Taiwan, Japan, and Korea, the researcher analyzed the construct of legal system, labor rights, and employers’ responsibilities for the accidents. Furthermore, the researcher would concentrate on administrative and judicial operation on recognition of hazards and compensations to examine the limitation and development of the laws. The future direction on the development of laws dealing with overwork occupational hazards were explained and discussed. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 應用研究 | en_US |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 學術補助 | en_US |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 研究期間:10108~ 10207 | en_US |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 研究經費:472仟元 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 職災;勞災;過勞;過勞死;精神壓力疾病;憂鬱;精神障害;過勞自殺 | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 職業健康的風險治理-過勞、精神壓力之職災保障與法律政策研究：台灣現況與日韓制度比較 | zh_TW |
| dc.title.alternative (其他題名) | Management of Overwork Occupational Hazards and Laws for Protection：A Comparison among the Taiwanese, Japanese and Korean System | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | report | en |
