1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Liberal Arts
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 濤慕思‧博格論責任、人權與貧窮
Thomas Pogge on Responsibility, Human Rights and Poverty
作者 林宸安
Lin, Chern An
貢獻者 鄭光明
林宸安
Lin, Chern An
關鍵詞 消極責任
積極義務
人權
傷害
制度
參與
日期 2011
上傳時間 2-Jan-2013 13:25:32 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文共分三個部分。本文第一部分試圖就博格（Thomas Pogge）對世界貧窮的關懷，所提出的理論做出說明與釐清。博格的理論試圖指出並說明，因為諸富裕國家之國民透過當今不正義的制度，而造成世界貧窮此一傷害，所以應為這樣的行為承擔責任。本文將在第一部分對其理論中「不正義的制度」做出釐清，並做討「制度是否能作為一個主動能動者」此一問題前的釐清與說明。
本文第二部分則是承接第一部分的分析，指出「制度」並非主動能動者，「制度傷人」亦須透過行為者的行為才能傷人。本文第二部分作為全文核心，將說明博格的理論為何需要對制度及行為者做出區分，而行為者又如何造成傷害。並將指出在博格的理論中，缺乏這部分的說明，導致其理論可能會得到博格本人所不願接受的結論。
本文第三部分則是試圖指出博格的理論會失敗，是由於他試圖以消極責任的概念來做人權的請求，而這將導致他的理論中，勢必談論到行為者的面向，而在此面相，尚有待經驗研究方能確定。而在本文第三部分將就博格的理論與漢娜鄂蘭（Hannah Arendt）所論及有關「罪與責任」的理論做比較，並用和博格進路不同的楊（Iris Young）的觀點，來指出無法採取博格的理論進路，來得到他所希望的結論。
參考文獻 Arendt, H. (2003). Collective responsibility. Responsibility and judgment. New York: Schocken Books. 147-158.

Arendt, H. (2005). Organized guilt and universal responsibility. Essays in understanding, 1930-1954 : formation, exile, and totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books. 121-132.

Cohen, J. (2010). Philosophy, Social Science, Global Poverty. Thomas Pogge and his critics. Cambridge: Polity. 18-45.

Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing & deserving; essays in the theory of responsibility. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

Jaggar, A. M. (2010). Thomas Pogge and his critics. Cambridge: Polity.

Miller, D. (2007). National responsibility and global justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Patten, A. (2005). Should We Stop Thinking about Poverty in Terms of Helping the Poor?. Ethics & International Affairs, 19, 1, 19-28.

Pogge, T. (2005). Severe Poverty as a Violation of Negative Duties. Ethics & International Affairs, 19, 1, 55-84.

Pogge, T. W. M., & Kosch, M. (2007a). John Rawls: His life and theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pogge, T. W. (2007b). Severe Poverty as a Human Rights Violation. Freedom from Poverty As a Human Right : Who Owes What to the Very Poor?, 11-53.

Pogge, T. W. M. (2008). World poverty and human rights. Cambridge: Polity.

Pogge, T. W. M. (2010a). Politics as usual: What lies behind the pro-poor rhetoric. Cambridge: Polity.
Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York u.a: Columbia Univ. Press.

Rawls, J. (2003). A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.

Risse, M. (2005). Do We Owe the Global Poor Assistance or Rectification?. Ethics & International Affairs, 19, 1, 9-18.

Salomon, M. E. (2007). Global responsibility for human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tan, K.-C. (2010). Rights, Harm, and Institutions. Thomas Pogge and his critics. Cambridge: Polity. 46-65.

Young, I. M. (2007). Global challenges: War, self determination and responsibility for justice. Cambridge: Polity.

Young, I. M. (2011). Responsibility for justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

博格著，劉莘譯（2010b）。〈評價社會制度的契約後果論視野的三個問題〉。《康德、羅爾斯與全球正義》，251-279頁。上海：上海譯文出版社。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
哲學研究所
99154006
100
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099154006
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 鄭光明zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林宸安zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lin, Chern Anen_US
dc.creator (作者) 林宸安zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lin, Chern Anen_US
dc.date (日期) 2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-Jan-2013 13:25:32 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-Jan-2013 13:25:32 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Jan-2013 13:25:32 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0099154006en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56522-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 哲學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 99154006zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 100zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文共分三個部分。本文第一部分試圖就博格（Thomas Pogge）對世界貧窮的關懷，所提出的理論做出說明與釐清。博格的理論試圖指出並說明，因為諸富裕國家之國民透過當今不正義的制度，而造成世界貧窮此一傷害，所以應為這樣的行為承擔責任。本文將在第一部分對其理論中「不正義的制度」做出釐清，並做討「制度是否能作為一個主動能動者」此一問題前的釐清與說明。
本文第二部分則是承接第一部分的分析，指出「制度」並非主動能動者，「制度傷人」亦須透過行為者的行為才能傷人。本文第二部分作為全文核心，將說明博格的理論為何需要對制度及行為者做出區分，而行為者又如何造成傷害。並將指出在博格的理論中，缺乏這部分的說明，導致其理論可能會得到博格本人所不願接受的結論。
本文第三部分則是試圖指出博格的理論會失敗，是由於他試圖以消極責任的概念來做人權的請求，而這將導致他的理論中，勢必談論到行為者的面向，而在此面相，尚有待經驗研究方能確定。而在本文第三部分將就博格的理論與漢娜鄂蘭（Hannah Arendt）所論及有關「罪與責任」的理論做比較，並用和博格進路不同的楊（Iris Young）的觀點，來指出無法採取博格的理論進路，來得到他所希望的結論。		zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 1. 緒論 1
1.1. 何謂世界貧窮 1
1.2. 傳統的立場 2
1.3. 博格的責任理論 4
1.4. 本文的論述策略 9

2. 正義與全球制度 13
2.1. 何謂制度性的理解「人權受侵害」？ 13
2.2. 傷害與不正義的制度 21
2.3. 不正義的全球制度 24
2.4. 責任如何歸屬 28
2.5. 本章小結 29

3. 為何被究責 33
3.1. 何謂傷害 33
3.2. 博格的傷害條件 35
3.3. 制度與行為者 37
3.4. 本章小結 41

4. 博格的理論困難 43
4.1. 為何博格需論及傷害 44
4.2. 參與制度等同應負責任？ 45
4.3. 「參與」的困難 52
4.4. 解決此困難的可能方法 54
4.5. 本章小結 58

5. 可能的修正方向 61
5.1. 為何需要修正 61
5.2. 行為者與集體責任 63
5.3. 楊（Iris Young）的社會連結模式責任理論 68
5.4. 本章小結 70

6. 結論 71

參考書目 73		zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099154006en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 消極責任zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 積極義務zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 人權zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 傷害zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 制度zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 參與zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 濤慕思‧博格論責任、人權與貧窮zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Thomas Pogge on Responsibility, Human Rights and Povertyen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Arendt, H. (2003). Collective responsibility. Responsibility and judgment. New York: Schocken Books. 147-158.

Arendt, H. (2005). Organized guilt and universal responsibility. Essays in understanding, 1930-1954 : formation, exile, and totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books. 121-132.

Cohen, J. (2010). Philosophy, Social Science, Global Poverty. Thomas Pogge and his critics. Cambridge: Polity. 18-45.

Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing & deserving; essays in the theory of responsibility. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

Jaggar, A. M. (2010). Thomas Pogge and his critics. Cambridge: Polity.

Miller, D. (2007). National responsibility and global justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Patten, A. (2005). Should We Stop Thinking about Poverty in Terms of Helping the Poor?. Ethics & International Affairs, 19, 1, 19-28.

Pogge, T. (2005). Severe Poverty as a Violation of Negative Duties. Ethics & International Affairs, 19, 1, 55-84.

Pogge, T. W. M., & Kosch, M. (2007a). John Rawls: His life and theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pogge, T. W. (2007b). Severe Poverty as a Human Rights Violation. Freedom from Poverty As a Human Right : Who Owes What to the Very Poor?, 11-53.

Pogge, T. W. M. (2008). World poverty and human rights. Cambridge: Polity.

Pogge, T. W. M. (2010a). Politics as usual: What lies behind the pro-poor rhetoric. Cambridge: Polity.
Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York u.a: Columbia Univ. Press.

Rawls, J. (2003). A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.

Risse, M. (2005). Do We Owe the Global Poor Assistance or Rectification?. Ethics & International Affairs, 19, 1, 9-18.

Salomon, M. E. (2007). Global responsibility for human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tan, K.-C. (2010). Rights, Harm, and Institutions. Thomas Pogge and his critics. Cambridge: Polity. 46-65.

Young, I. M. (2007). Global challenges: War, self determination and responsibility for justice. Cambridge: Polity.

Young, I. M. (2011). Responsibility for justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

博格著，劉莘譯（2010b）。〈評價社會制度的契約後果論視野的三個問題〉。《康德、羅爾斯與全球正義》，251-279頁。上海：上海譯文出版社。		zh_TW