Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 巴塔耶的普遍經濟論:耗費與聖性
The Theory of General Economy of Georges Bataille: Expenditure and the Sacred作者 蔡翔任 貢獻者 蔡錚雲
蔡翔任關鍵詞 普遍經濟
耗費
聖性
越度
至尊性
獻祭
general economy
expenditure
sacred
transgression
sovereignty
sacrifice日期 2011 上傳時間 2-Jan-2013 13:25:33 (UTC+8) 摘要 本論文研究的是巴塔耶的普遍經濟論，它主要分四部分來探討。它首先從時間的瞬間性和能量的耗費兩個原理出發來說明什麼是普遍經濟。接著說明的是聖世界與俗世界二分的原理，這又可分兩部分來討論。從勞動與消盡的第一組對立可以產生聖俗的區分判隼，一者是勞動的超越性世界，一者是獻祭暴力的內在性世界。從禁忌與越度的第二組對立可以導出聖俗的再次區分，一者是禁忌所管轄的俗世界，一者是人性逾越的歡慶狀態。此外，普遍經濟論可以充分說明各種笑的型態，最終導向對超越的虛無性的笑。最末，本論文從死亡共同體的角度提出一種普遍經濟的友情論。
This study is to discuss the theory of general economy of Georges Bataille. The argument falls into four parts. First, it accounts for what general economy means by inspecting two principles: that of instant and that of expenditure. Next, the discussion goes to what separates the sacred from the profane world. On the one hand, the profane world is dominated by work and labor which make it transcendent while the sacred immanent world is liberated from within by the representation of sacrificial violence. On the other hand, while the taboo has a command of the profane, human beings achieve and celebrate their sovereignty by transgressing the interdiction. Then, the discussion shows that general economy can have sufficient and satisfactory explanation of the morphology of laughter. Finally, it proposes a new meaning of friendship from the economic view.參考文獻 參考書目\n一、 外文原著與譯著\nGeorges Bataille, OEUVRES COMPLÈTES, Paris: Gallimard,\nGeorges Bataille, The Unfinished System of Nonknowledge, edited and with an\nIntroduction by Stuart Kendall, translated by Michelle Kendall and Stuart Kendall, London:\nUniversity of Minnesota Press, 2001.\nGeorges Bataille, Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927-1939, edited and with an\nIntroduction by Allan Stoekl, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985, p. 144.\nGeorges Bataille, Theory of Religion, New York: Zone Books, 2001\nGeorges Bataille, Guilty, translated by Bruce Boone with introduction by Denis Hollier,\nThe Lapis Press, 1988\nGeorges Bataille, The Accursed Share, Volume I-III, New York: Zone Books, 1988.\nGeorges Bataille, Inner Experience, translated by Leslie Anne Boldt, New York: State\nUniversity Press, 1988.\nGeorges Bataille, On Nietzsche, translated by Bruce Boone, New York: Paragon House,\n1994.\nGeorges Bataille, Death and Sensuality: A Study of Eroticism and the Taboo, New York:\nWalker and Company, 1962.\nGeorges Bataille, The Tears of Eros, translated by Peter Connor, San Francisco: City\nLights Books, 1989.\nGeorges Bataille, The Cradle of Humanity: Prehistoric Art and Culture, edited and\nintroduced by Stuart Kendall, translated by Michelle Kendall and Stuart Kendall, New\nYork: Zone Books, 2005.\nGeorges Bataille, The Impossible: A Story of Rats followed by Dianus and by The\nOresteia, translated by Robert Hurley, San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1991.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n244\nThe College of Sociology(1937-39),edited by Denis Hollier, translated by Betsy Wing,\nMinneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.\nThe Bataille Reader, edited by Fred Boting and Scott Wilson, Blackwell Publishers, 1998.\n二、 外文引用資料\nAgamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford\nUniversity Press, 1995.\nAmes, Kenneth M. ‘The Evolution of Social Ranking on the Northwest Coast of North\nAmerica’in American Antiquity, Vol. 46, No. 4 ( Oct., 1981), p. 795.\nAmes, Kenneth M. ‘Slaves, Chiefs and Labour on the Northern Northwest Coast’in\nWorld Archaeology, Vol. 33, No. 1, The Archaeology of Slavery (Jun., 2001), pp. 1-17.\nAnthony, Ross ‘”This is Not an Exit”: The Sacred in the Age of Consumer\nCapitalism’.\nArnould, Elisabeth, ‘ The Impoosible Sacrifice of Poetry: Bataille and the Nancian\nCritique of Sacrifice’, Diacritics, 26.2 (1996), pp. 86-96.\nArnsperger, Christian. ‘Methodological altruism as an alternative foundation for\nindividual optimization’ in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Volume 3, Number 2,\n2000.\nAvni, Ora. ‘The Semiotics of Transactions: Mauss, Lacan and the three Musketeers’in\nModern Language Notes, Vol. 100, No. 4, French Issue ( Sep., 1985), p. 744.\nBenardete, Seth. The Tragedy and Comedy of Life: Plato’s Philebus, translated and with\nCommentary by Seth Benardete, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press,\n1993, p. 83.\nBesnard, Philippe.’La formation de l’équipe de l’Anée sociologique’, Revue Française\nde sociologie. 1979, 20-1. pp. 7-31.\nBlanchot, Maurice. The Infinite Conversation, translation and foreword by Susan Hanson,\nMinneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n245\nBlanchot, Maurice.‘The Birth of Art’, Friendship, translated by Elizabeth Rottenberg,\nCalifornia: Stanford University Press, 1997\nBorch-Jacobsen, Mikkel .‘The Laughter of Being’, Modern Language Notes, Vol. 102,\nNo. 4, French Issue (Sep., 1987), pp. 737-760.\nBorgeaud, Philippe. ‘Le couple sacré/profane. Genèse et fortune d’un concept 《opé\nratoire》en histoire des religions’,in Revue de l’histoire des religions, tome 211 n˚ 4. pp.\n387-418.\nBorgerson, Janet and Alf Rehn, ‘ General Economy and Productive Dualisms’. Gender,\nWork and Organization, volume 11, issue4, July 2004. pp. 455-474.\nBras, Gabriel Le.’Note sur la sociologie religieuse dans l’Année Sociologique’,\nArchives des sciences sociales des religions. N. 21, 1966. p, 50.\nBurkert, Walter, René Girard, and Jonathan Smith, Ritual Killing and Cultural Formation,\nedited by Robert Hamerton, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.\nCaillé, Alain. ‘Apologie et critique du don. Le don entre science sociale et psychanalyse :\nL`héritage de Mauss jusqu`à Lacan’, Revue du MAUSS 1/2006(n˚ 27), p. 14.\nCaillé, Alain. ‘Don et symbolisme’, La revue du MAUSS semestrielle n˚12, Plus réel\nque le réel, le symbolisme, MAUSS/La Découverte, 1998.\nCaillé, Alain. ‘Du don comme réponse à l`énigme du don’, L’Homme, 1997, tome 37\nn˚142.\nCaillé, Alain. ‘Nouvelle thèse sur la religion’Revue du MAUSS semestrielle, 2003 (n˚\n22), p. 318-327.\nCaillé, Alain. ’Anti-utilitarianism, economics and the gift-paradigm’\nCaillé, Alain.‘Marcel Mauss et le parardigme du don’ in Sociologie et sociétés, vol. 36,\nn° 2, 2004, p. 145.\nCaillé, Alain.’Ce qu’on appelle si mal le don...Que le don est de l’ordre du don malgré\ntout’：\nhttp://www.cairn.info/revue-du-mauss-2007-2-page-393.htm，pp. 396-97.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n246\nCaillois, Roger, Man, Play, and Games, translated by Meyer Barash, New York: The Free\nPress, 1961.\nConklin, Alice L.’Civil Society, Science, and Empire in Late Republican France: The\nFoundation of Paris’s Museum of Man’, Osiris, Vol. 17, Science and Civil Society\n(2002), pp. 255-290.\nClifford, James.’On Ethnographic Surrealism’, Comparative Studies in Society and\nHistory, Vol. 23, No.4 ( Oct., 1981), pp. 539-564.\nComay, Rebecca .‘Gifts Without Presents: Economies of “Experience” in Bataille and\nHeidegger’, Yale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990), p. 89.\nCouture, André.’De l’abus de sacré dans l’édude des religions de l’Inde: De l’utilisation\nde l’opposition sacré/profane en context hindou et bouddhique’\nCrémoux, Françoise. ‘Du sacré aux sacralités’Pandora: revue d`etudes hispaniques, Nº. 4,\n2004, págs. 9-16.\nCsordas, Thomas J. ‘Asymptote of the Ineffable: Embodiment, Alterity, and the Theory of\nReligion’, Current Anthropology, Vol. 45, No. 2 (April 2004), pp. 163-185.\nDerlon, Brigitte and Marie Mauz é , ‘“Sacred”or“sensitive“ objects’Projet\nECHO – Atelier « Objets et société », sous la dir. De Maurice Godelier - Non-European\nComponents of European Patrimony –http://www.necep.net\nDerrida, Jacques. Writing and Difference, translated by Alan Bass, London and Henley:\nRoutledge, 1978.\nDerrida, Jacques .‘ Economimesis’, Diacritics, Vol. 11 (1981), translated by R. Klein, p.\n3-25.\nDescombes, Vincent.’L` Équivoque du symbolique’ Modern Language Notes, Vol. 94,\nNo. 4 (May, 1979)\nDetienne, Marcel.’Culinary Practice and the Spirit of Sacrifice’. The Cuisine of\nSacrifice among the Greeks, ed by Marcel Detienne and Jean-Pierre Vernant. Trans. Paula\nWissing, Chicago, 1989, pp. 14-20.\nDillon, John. The Middle Platonists: A Study of Platonism, 80 B.C. to A.D. 220, London:\nDuckworth, 1977.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n247\nDirek, Zeynep, ‘Bataille on Immanent and Transcendent Violence’, Bulletin de la Société\nAméricaine de Philosophie de Langue Française, Volume 14, Issue 2, Fall 2004, pp. 29-49.\nDirek, Zeynep, ‘ On the Sources and the Structure of Derrida’s Radical Notion of\nExperience’, http://www.usc.edu/dept/comp-lit/tympanum/4/direk.html\nDoroszewski, Witold.’Quelques remarques sur les rapports de la sociologie et la\nlinguistique: Durkheim et F. de Saussure’. Journal de Psychologie normale et\npathologique. Vol. 30, p. 82-91.\nDouglas, Mary. Purity and Danger, London and New York: Routledge, 2003.\nDrury, Shadia. Alexandre Kojéve: the Roots of Postmodern Politics, Palgrave MacMillan,\n1994.\nDubar, Claude.‘La méthode de Marcel Mauss’, in Revue française de sociologie. 1969,\npp. 515-521.\nDurkheim, Emil, Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse : le système totémique en\naustraile, Paris: Presses Universitires de France, 1960.\nFilloux, Jean-Claude. ‘Personne et sacré chez Durkheim’, Archives des sciences\nsociales des religions. N. 69, 1990. pp. 41-53.\nFoucault, Michel .‘A Preface to Transgression’, in Language, Counter-Memory,\nPractice: Selected Essays and Interviews, ed. With an introduction by Donald F. Bouchard,\ntrans. Donald F. Bouchard and Sherry Simon, Ithaca: Cornel Univesrity Press, 1977.\nFoucault, Michel, ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’, Language, Counter-Memory, Practice:\nSelected Essays and Interviews, edited by D. F. Bouchard, Ithaca: Cornell University Press,\n1977.\nFoucault, Michel, Religion and Culture, selected and edited by Jeremy R. Carrette.\nManchester: Manchester University Press, 1999.\nFournier, Marcel Marcel Mauss, l’ethnologie et la politique: le don, 1995.\nGans, Eric. Signs of Paradox: Irony, Resentment, and Other Mimetic Structures.Stanford:\nStanford University Press, 1997.\nGiesen, Bernhard.‘Performing Transcendence in Politics: Sovereignty, Deviance, and the\nVoid of Meaning’, Sociological Theory, Vol. 23, No. 3( Sep., 2005),.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n248\nGoody, Jack. ‘Religion and Ritual: The Definitional Problem’, The British Journal of\nSociology, Vol. 12, No. 2 (Jun., 1961)\nGousgounis, Nikos. ‘Transgressing Character of the Sacred in the Double Ritual of\nAnastenaria’, Studies of Tribes and Tribals, Vol, 1. num, 2003. p, 127-140.\nGoux, Jean-Joseph and Kathryn Ascheim, Rhonda Garelick, ‘General Economics and\nPostmodern Capitalism’, Yale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990), pp. 206-224.\nGuerlac, Suzanne, ‘ Bataille in Theory: Afterimages (Lascaux)’, Diacritics, Vol. 26, No.\n2, Georges Bataille: An Occasion for Misunderstanding (Summer, 1996), pp. 9-17.\nGuerlac, Suzanne, ‘”Recognition”by a Woman!: A Reading of Bataille’s L’Erotisme’,\nYale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990), pp.90-105.\nHabermas, Jürgen . The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, translated by Frederick\nLawrence, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.\nHarrison, Jane Ellen. Ancient Art and Ritual, London: Oxford University Press, 1951.\nHeimonet, Jean-Michel and Joaniko Kohchi, ‘ Recoil in Order to Leap Forward: Two\nValues of Sade in Bataille’s Text’, in Yale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990).\nHollier, Denis . Against Architecture: The Writings of Georges Bataille. The MIT Press,\n1992.\nHollier, Denis and Hilari Allred, ‘The Dualist Materialism of Georges Bataille’, Yale\nFrench Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990), pp. 124-139.\nDidi-Huberman, Georges. Survivance des lucioles, Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 2009.\nIgrek, Apple ‘Concrete Containment in Late Capitalism, Mysticism, the Marquis de Sade,\nand Phenomenological Anthropology’, Colloquy Text Theory Critique, No. 15 (2008), pp.\n96-114.\nIrwin, Jones. ‘Heterodox Religion and Post-Atheism: Bataille/Klossowski/Foucault’, in\nMinerva-An Internet Journal of Philosophy 10 (2006): 215-244.\nIsambert, François-Andr é . ‘L’Elaboration de la notion de sacr é dans l’ é cole\ndurkheimienne cas’, Archives des sciences sociales des religions. N. 42, 1976. pp, 35-56.\nJamin, Jean. ‘Le savant et le politique: Paul Rivet( 1876-1958)’, Bulletins et Mémoires\nde la Société d’anthropologie de Paris, Nouvelle Série, tome 1, 1989. p, 282.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n249\nJones, Robert Alun. ‘Durkheim, Frazer, and Smith: The Role of Analogies and Exemplars\nin the Development of Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion’, pp.596-627.\nJones, Robert Alun Emile Durkheim: An Introduction to Four Major Works, Beverly Hills,\nCA; Sage Publications, 1986, pp.136-37，以及\nJones, Robert Alun. ’On Understanding a Sociological Classic’, in The American\nJournal of Sociology, Vol. 83, No. 2 (Sep., 1977), pp. 308-09.\nKarady, Victor. ‘Le probl ème de la l é gitimit é dans l’organisation historique de\nl’ethnologie française’, Revue française de sociologie. 1982, 23-1. pp.17-35.\nKarady, Victor. ‘Stratégies de réussite et modes de faire-valoir de la sociologie chez les\ndurkheimiens’, Revue française de sociologie. 1979, 20-1. p, 72.\nKarady, Victor. ‘Durkheim, les sciences sociales et l’Université: bilan d’un semiéchec’.\nRevue française de sociologie. 1976, 17-2\nKarady, Victor. ‘Durkheim et les débuts de l’ethnologie universitaire’, Actes de la\nrecherche en sciences sociales. Vol. 74, 1988.\nKlossowski, Pierre .‘ A propos du simulacre dans la communication de Georges\nBataille’ , in Critique , Août-septembre 1963, p. 742.\nKlossowski, Pierre, Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle, translated by Daniel W. Smith, The\nUniversity of Chicago Press, 1997.\nKristeva, Julia Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection, translated by Leon S. Roudiez,\nNew York: Columbia University Press, 1982,\nKuper, Adam. ‘Durkheim’s theory of Primitive Kinship’. The British Journal of\nSociology, Vol. 36, No. 2 (Jun., 1985), p. 231.\nLacoue-Labarthe, Philippe. Heidegger, Art and Politics: The Fiction of the Political,\ntranslated by Chris Turner, Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1990.\nLassègue, Jean and Victor Rosenthal & Yves-Marie Visetti, ‘Économie symbolique et\nphylogenèse du langage’. L`HOMME 192/2009\nLassègue, Jean. ‘Archéologie de la fonction symbolique: quelques pistes récentes’(expos\né au séminaire’ Formes Symboliques’18 octobre 2005)\nLawtoo, Nidesh .‘Bataille and the Suspension of Being’, Lingua Romana: a journal of\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n250\nFrench, Italian and Romanian culture, volume 4, issue 1/fall 2005.\nLévi-Strauss, Claude. ‘Introduction à l’oeuvre de Marcel Mauss’,in Marcel Mauss,\nSociologie et Anthropologie, précédé d’une Introduction à l’oeuvre de Marcel Mauss par\nClaude Lévi-Strauss, Paris: P.U.F., 1950.\nLévi-Strauss, Claude. ‘ L’efficacité symbolique’, Revue de l’histoire des religions, 1949,\nvol. 135, pp. 5-27.\nLévi-Strauss, Claude. ‘La sexualité féminine et l`origine de la société’, Temps Modernes,\nn˚ 598, mars-avril 1998, p.66-84.\nLibertson, Joseph ‘ Excess and Imminence: Transgression in Bataille’, in MLN, Vol.\n92, No. 5, Compartive Literature (Dec., 1977), p. 1005.\nLibertson, Joseph. ‘Bataille and Communication: Savoir, Non-Savoir, Glissement, Rire’\nin Leslie Anne Boldt-Irons (ed.) On Bataille: Critical Essays, Albany: State University of\nNew York Press, 1995, p. 209.\nMarcel, Jean-Christophe. ‘Bataille et Mauss: un dialogue de sourds?’. Temps modernes,\nno. 602, 1999\nMarshall, Douglas A. ‘Durkheimian Dualism Redux: Homo Duplex and the Origins of\nReligion’\nMasuzawa, Tomoko. ‘The Sacred Difference in the Elementary Forms: On Durkheim’s\nLast Quest’. Representations, No. 23 (Summer, 1988), pp. 25-50.\nMauss, Marcel. Essai sur le don: forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques.\nIn Sociologie et anthropologie, Presses Universitaires de France, 1995.\nMehlman, Jeffrey. ‘The “Floating Signifier”: From Lévi-Strauss to Lacan’, Yale\nFrench Studies, No. 48, French Freud: Structural Studies in Psychoanalysis (1972)\nMeltzer, Françoise .‘On the Question of Aufhebung: Baudelaire, Bataille and Sartre’,\nRCCS, no. 75 (October 2006), p. 9.\nMoebius, Stephan.’Über die kollektive Repräsentation des Lebens und des Sakralen: Die\nVerknüpfung von Durkheim und Nietzsche in Geschichte und Gegenwart der Soziologie\nund Kulturanthropologie’, p. 3.\nNietzsche, Friedrich . Jenseits von Gut und Böse, Zur Genealogie der Moral, Kritische\nStudienausgabe Herausgegeben von Giorgio Colli und Mazzino Montinari, Deutscher\nTaschenbuch Verlag de Gruyter, 1988.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n251\nNoys, Benjamin .Georges Bataille: A Critical Introduction, London: Pluto Press, 2000, pp.\nPanoff, Michel.‘ Marcel Mauss’s “The Gift” Revisited’, in Man, New Series, Vol. 5,\nNo. 1 (Mar., 1970), p. 61.\nPaoletti, Giovanni .’Durkheim et le problème de l’objectivité: une lecture des Formes él\némentaires de la vie religieuse’, Revue française de sociologie. 2002, 43-3. pp.\n437-459.\nParsons, Talcott Essays in Sociological Action. New York: Glencoe, 1954\nPettit, Philip. ‘Agency-freedom and Option-freedom’, Journal of Theoretical Politics\n15(4), pp. 387-403.\nPickering, W. S. F. Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion: Themes and Theories, London:\nRoutledge and Kegan Paul, 1984\nPickering, W. S. F. ‘The Eternality of the Sacred: Durkheim’s Error?’. Archives des\nsciences socials des religions. N. 69, 1990.\nPizzorno, Akssandro.‘Politics Unbound.’ In Changing Boundaries of the Political.\nedited by Charles Maier, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1987.\nPoulet, Régis. ‘Les réponses érotiques de l’art préhistorique: un éclairage bataillien’,\ndimanche 12 septembre 2010. 網址：\nhttp://www.larevuedesressources.org/les-reponses-erotiques-de-l-art-prehistorique-un-eclair\nage-bataillien,605.html\nPrades, José . ‘La Religion de l’humanité: Notes sur l’anthropo-centrisme durkheimien’.\nArchives des sciences sociales des religions. N. 69, 1990. pp.55-68.\nRamel, Fréd é ric. ‘Lévi-Strauss et les relations etrangeres des tribus primitives’.\nKlesis-Revue philosophique/ Hommage a Claude Lévi-Strauss, 10, 2008.\nRaschke, Carl. “Bataille’s Gift.” Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory vol. 5 no. 1\n(December 2003): pp. 1-8.\nRauch, Leo and David Sherman, Phenomenology of Self-Consciousness: Text and\nCommentary, New York: State University of New York Press, 1999.\nRenfrew, Colin. ‘Neuroscience, evolution and the sapient paradox: the factuality of value\nand of the sacred’ in The Sapient Mind: Archaeology Meets Neuroscience, Oxford\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n252\nUniversity Press, 2009, pp. 165-176.\nRichardson, Michael Georges Bataille, London and New York: Routledge, 1994\nRichman, Michèle. ‘The sacred group: A Durkeimian perspective on the Collège de\nsociologie’, Bataille: Writing the sacred, edited by Carolyn Bailey Gill, London and\nNew York: Routledge, 1995\nRiley, Alexander T. ‘Renegade Durkheimianism” and the Transgressive/Left Sacred’, p.\n2. in The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim , Edited by: Jeffrey C. Alexander and Philip\nSmith, 2005.\nRiley, Alexander T. ‘The Institutional ‘Missing Links’ in the Genealogical Tree\nConnecting Durkheim to Foucault: A Micro-Sociology of the Journals and Personal\nRelationships that Made Poststructuralism Durkheimian ‘Paper presented at the annual\nmeeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal Convention Center, Montreal,\nQuebec, Canada, Aug 10, 2006\nRiley, Alexander T. ‘Renegade Durkheimianism” and the Transgressive/Left Sacred’,\np.12. in The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim , Edited by: Jeffrey C. Alexander and\nPhilip Smith, 2005.\nRiley, Alexander T. ‘The Sacred Calling of Intellectual Labor in Mystic and Ascetic\nDurkheimianism’European Journal of Sociology (2002), 43: 354-385\nRiley, Alexander T. ‘The Intellectural and Political Project of Robert Hertz: The\nMaking of a Peculiar Durkheimian Intellectual, as seen through Selected Correspondence\nwith Pierre Roussel’ Durkheimian Studies, vol. 5, n.s., 1999:29-59.\nRiley, Alexander T.’Durkheim vs. Bergson? The Hidden Roots of Postmodern Theory\nand The Postmodern ‘Return’ of the Sacred’. Sociological Perspectives. Vol 45, 2002,\npp.257.\nRiley, Alexander T.’Whence Durkheim’s Nietzschean Grandchildren ?: A Closer Look\nat Robert Hertz’s Place in the Durkheimian Geneaolgy’in Archives européenes de\nsociologie/European Journal of Sociology, 40:2, 1999:110-137.\nRobertson, Fabien’Durkheim: Entre religion et morale’,p. 127-132.\nRoss, Marina Davila and Michael Owren, Elke Zimmermann, ‘ Reconstructing the\nEvolution of Laughter in Great Apes and Humans’, Current Biology, Vol19, No 13, 2009,\npp. 1-6.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n253\nStaum, Martin. ‘Nature and Nuture in French Ethnography and Anthropology,\n1859-1914’, Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 65, No. 3(2004), pp. 475-495.\nSteiner, Philippe. ‘Religion et économie. Mauss, Simiand et le programme durkheimien’,\nin Revue française de sociologie. 2001, 42-4. pp. 695-718.\nStoekl, Allan. ‘Truman’s Apotheosis: Bataille, “Planisme,” and Headlessness’,\nYale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990), pp. 181-205.\nSumpf, Joseph. ‘Durkheim et le problème de l’étude sociologique de la religion’,\nArchives des sciences sociales des religions. N. 20m 1965, p.63.\nSumpf, Joseph. ‘Linguistique et sociologie’, in Languages, 3e année, n11, 1968\nSurkis, Judith, ‘No Fun and Games Until Someone Loses an Eye: Transgression and\nMasculinity in Bataille and Foucault’, Diacritics, 26.2 (1996), pp. 18-30.\nSzlezák, Thomas A. Reading Plato, translated by Graham Zanker, London and New York:\nRoutledge, 1993\nTarot, Camille Le symbolisme et le sacré: théorie de la religion ÉDITIONS LA\nDÉCOUVERTE/M.A.U.S.S. Paris, 2008.\nTarot, Camille. ‘Religion, faut-il avoir peur de qui et de quoi?’ In Revue du MAUSS,\n2008，網路連結見：http://www.journaldumauss.net/spip.php?article424\nTarot, Camille. ‘Don et grâce, une famille à recomposer?’in Gifts and Interest, Louvain,\nPeeters,\nTeixeira, Vincent. Georges Bataille, La part de l’art (la peinture du non-savoir), Paris:\nl’Harmattan, Ouverture Philosophique, 1997\nTestart , Alain and Amy Jacobs, ‘The extent and significance of debt slavery’in Revue\nfrançaise de sociologie. 2002, 43-1. pp. 173-204.\nUngar, Steven, ‘Phantom Lascaux: Origin of the Work of Art’, Yale French Studies,\nNo. 78, On Bataille (1990)< pp. 246-262.\nUricoechea, Fernando. ‘Durkheim’s Conception of the Religious Life: a Critique’, in\nArchives des sciences sociales des religions. N. 79, 1992.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n254\nVogt, W. Paul. ‘The Uses of Studying Primitives: A Note on the Durkheimans,\n1890-1940’in History and Theory, Vol. 15, No. 1(1976), pp. 33-44.\nWeiner, Annette B. ‘Inalienable Wealth’in American Ethnologist, Vol. 12, No. 2( May,\n1985), pp. 210-227.\nWeiss, Allen S. ‘Impossible Sovereignty: Between “The Will to Power” and “The\nWill to Chance”’, October, Vol. 36, Georges Bataille: Writings on Laughter, Sacrifice,\nNietzsche, Un-Knowing. (Spring, 1986),\nWhite, Richard ‘Bataille on Lascaux and the Origin of Art’, in Janus Head, pp. 319-331.\n網址見：http://www.janushead.org/11-2/White.pdf\nWilde, Oscar, De Profundis and Other Writings, London: Penguin Books, 1986.\nZerilli, Filippo M. ‘Du déménagement comme coupure épistémologique. Durkheim and\nethnographical sources’in Revue européenne des sciences sociales, Numéro 129 (2004):\nLa sociologie durkheimienne: tradition et actualité.\n三、中文參考資料\n1. 巴塔耶的著作中譯\n《情色論》，賴守正譯，台北：聯經，2012。\n《色情史》，劉暉譯，北京：商務，2003。\n《色情、耗費與普遍經濟：喬志․巴塔耶文選》。汪民安編，吉林人民出版社，\n2003。\n2. 其他中文參考資料\n三劃\n子安宣邦《國家與祭祀》，董炳月譯，北京：三聯，2007。\n四劃\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n255\n毛斯（Marcel Mauss）《禮物》，汲喆譯，上海：人民出版社，2002。\n毛斯（Marcel Mauss）《社會學與人類學》，余碧平譯，上海：上海譯文出版社，\n2003。\n布勒東（André Breton）《超現實主義宣言》，袁俊生譯，重慶：重慶大學出版社，\n2010。\n巴特（Roland Barthes）《符號禪意東洋風》，孫乃修譯，台北：台灣商務印書館，\n民國82 年。\n五劃\n尼采（Friedrich Nietzsche）《扎拉圖斯特拉如是說》，黃明嘉、樓林譯，上海：華\n東師範大學出版社，2009。\n尼采（Friedrich Nietzsche）《朝霞》，田立年譯，上海：華東師範大學出版社，2007。\n布朗（Norman Oliver Brown）《生與死的對抗》，馮川、伍厚愷譯，貴陽：貴州人\n民出版社，1994。\n古德利爾（Maurice Godelier）《禮物之謎》，王毅譯，上海：上海人民出版社，2007\n年。\n卡西勒（Ernst Cassirer）《語言與神話》，于曉 等譯，台北：桂冠，2002。\n卡西爾（Ernst Cassirer）《神話思維》，黃龍保、周振 選譯，北京：中國社會科學\n出版社，1992。\n加藤秀俊《餘暇社會學》，彭德中譯，台北：遠流，1989。\n古迪（Jack Goody）《烹飪、菜餚與階級》，王榮欣、沈南山譯，浙江：浙江大學\n出版社，2010。\n皮柏（Josef Pieper）《閒暇：文化的基礎》，劉森堯譯，台北：立緒，2003。\n六劃\n伊森˙克萊茵伯格（Ethan Kleinberg）《存在的一代：海德格爾哲學在法國\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n256\n1927-1961》，陳穎譯，北京：新星出版社，2010。\n七劃\n克里斯蒂娃（Julia Kristeva）《恐怖的權力：論卑賤》，北京：三聯，2001。\n佛洛依德（Sigmund Freud）《圖騰與禁忌》，台北：志文出版社，1989。\n克羅絲（Rosalind E. Krauss）《前衛的原創性》，連德誠譯，台北：遠流，1995。\n克萊蒙（Catherine B.-Clement）、布律諾（Pierre Bruno）、賽弗（Lucien Seve）《馬\n克思主義與心理分析》，徐更高譯，台北：南方，民國77 年。\n余德慧《生命夢屋》，台北：張老師，2010 年。\n余德慧《生死學十四講》，台北：心靈工坊，2003。\n余德慧〈探討癌末處境「聖世界」的形成〉，《生死學研究》第三卷，嘉義：南華\n大學，2006，頁1-58。\n牟宗三《才性與玄理》，台北：學生書局，2002。\n牟斯（Marcel Mauss）《禮物：舊社會中交換的形式與功能》汪珍宜、何翠萍譯，\n台北：遠流（新橋譯叢17），2001。\n李維史陀（Claude Lévi-Strauss）《廣闊的視野》，肖津等譯，台北：桂冠，2004。\n杜蒙（Louis Dumont）《階序人》，王志明譯，台北：遠流，2007。\n李區（Edmund Leach）《上緬甸諸政治體制》，張恭啟、黃道琳譯，台北：唐山，\n民國92。\n李基（Richard Leakey）《人類傳奇》，楊玉齡譯，台北：天下文化，1995。\n李建漳〈「大政治」及「未來哲學」的同一性：對尼采整體哲學的一個詮釋〉《台\n大文史哲學報》，第七十三期，2010 年11 月。\n芮克里夫-布朗（A. R. Radcliife-Brown）《社會人類學方法》，夏建中，台北：桂冠，\n1991。\n伊利亞德（Mircea Eliade）《聖與俗—宗教的本質》，楊素娥譯，台北：桂冠，2000。\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n257\n八劃\n阿岡本（Giorgio Agamben）《例外狀態》，薛熙平譯，台北：麥田，2010。\n阿倫特，漢娜（Hannah Arendt）《精神生活˙意志》，姜志輝譯，南京：江蘇教育\n出版社，2006。\n阿姆斯壯（Karen Armstrong）《神的歷史》，蔡昌雄譯，台北：立緒，2000。\n拉德克立夫-布朗（A. R. Radcliife-Brown）《原始社會的結構與功能》，潘蛟、王賢\n海、劉文遠、知寒譯，北京：中央民族大學出版社，1999。\n果德里耶（Maurice Godelier），〈李維史陀：馬克思及馬克思之後？重新估價結構\n主義和馬克思主義方法論：一個社會邏輯分析〉，張寧譯，《當代》，第57 期，1991，\n一月。\n佩爾尼奧拉（Mario Perniola）《儀式思維》，呂捷譯，北京：商務，2006。\n佩迪特（Philip Pettit）《共和主義》，南京：江蘇人民出版社，2006。\n昆德拉，米蘭（Milan Kundera）《被背叛的遺囑》，香港：牛津大學出版社，1993。\n昆德拉，米蘭《笑忘書》，尉遲秀譯，台北：皇冠，2002。\n帕茲（Octavio Paz）《雙重火焰》，台北：邊城，2004。\n帕斯（Octavio Paz）《帕斯選集》，北京：作家出版社，2006。\n九劃\n柏拉圖《巴曼尼德斯篇》陳康譯，北京：商務出版社，1997。\n珍古德（Jane Goodall）《與牠為伴：非洲叢林三十年》，台北：格林，1996。\n胡蘭成《今日何日兮》，台北：三三書坊，民79 年。\n十劃\n涂爾幹（Emil Durkheim）《宗教生活的基本形式》，芮傳明、趙學元譯，台北：桂\n冠，1992。\n涂爾幹（Emil Durkheim）《宗教生活的基本形式》，渠東、汲喆譯，上海：人民出\n版社，2010。\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n258\n涂爾幹（Emil Durkheim）《亂倫禁忌及其起源》，汲喆、付德根、渠東譯，渠東、\n梅非校，上海：人民出版社，2003。\n莫斯（Marcel Mauss）《人類學與社會學五講》，桂林：廣西師範大學，2008。\n馬林諾斯基（B. Malinowski）《南海舡人》，于嘉雲譯，台北：遠流（新橋譯叢），\n1991。\n馬林諾斯基（B. Malinowski）《神聖的性生活》，何勇譯，北京：知識出版社，1998。\n馬累德（R. R. Marett）《心理學與民俗學》，曾召銘譯，台北：結構群，1990。\n莎蒂亞˙德魯里（Shadia Drury）《亞歷山大˙科耶夫：後現代政治的根源》，趙琦\n譯，北京：新星出版社，2007。\n倫弗瑞（Colin Renfrew）《史前：文明記憶拼圖》，張明玲譯，台北：貓頭鷹，2010。\n海德（Lewis Hyde）《禮物的美學：藝術經濟理論的新主張》，台北：商周，2008。\n十一劃\n韋伯（Max Weber）《宗教社會學》，康樂、簡惠美譯，台北：遠流，1993 年。\n韋伯（Max Weber）《支配社會學II》，康樂、簡惠美譯，台北：遠流，1993 年。\n韋納（Annette Weiner）〈不可異化的財富〉，收錄在童元昭主編《群島之洋：人類\n學的大洋洲研究》，台北：商務，2009，頁115-148。\n朗佩特（Laurence Lampert）《尼采的使命：善惡的彼岸解讀》，李致遠、李小均譯，\n北京：華夏出版社，2009。\n埃文斯-普李查德（E. E. Evans-Pritchard）《原始宗教理論》，孫尚揚譯，北京：商\n務印書館，2001。\n菲立普，亞當（Adam Phillips）《吻、搔癢與煩悶》，陳信宏譯，台北：究竟，2000。\n袁瓊瓊〈我一直懷疑〉，《壹週刊》，No. 571, 2012, 5/3, pp. 138-39.\n十二劃\n納斯鮑姆（Martha Nussbaum）《善的脆弱性》，徐向東、陸萌譯，上海：譯林出版\n社，2007。\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n259\n斯勒扎克（Thomas Szlezak）《讀柏拉圖》，程煒譯，上海：譯林出版社，2009。\n湯淺博雄，《巴塔耶：消盡》，趙漢英譯，河北：河北教育出版社，2001 年。\n勞思光《新編中國哲學史》，台北：三民，民國80 年。\n黃胤毓〈滲透太陽（身體）的攝影機介質—論三島由紀夫影像肉體論的內攝與官\n能燔〉，《文化研究月報》，109 期，Oct. 2010，頁1-29。\n喜戒禪師《佛陀親授四正念的四個練習》，賴隆彥譯，台北：橡樹林，2005。\n彭羅斯（Roger Penrose）《皇帝新腦》，許明賢、吳忠超譯，台北：藝文印書館，\n民國82 年。\n十四劃\n蔡錚雲《從現象學到後現代》，台北：三民，1995。\n蔡淑玲〈巴岱儀的否定與逾越〉，《中外文學》，第24 卷，第2 期，1995 年7 月，\n頁116-127。\n赫爾茲，羅伯特（Robert Hertz）《死亡與右手》，吳鳳玲譯，上海：上海人民出版\n社，2011。\n十五劃\n蔣年豐《與西洋哲學對話》，台北：桂冠，2005。\n德貢布，文森特（Vincent Descombes）《當代法國哲學》，北京：新星出版社，2007。\n諾齊克（Robert Nozick）《經過省查的人生—哲學沈思錄》，嚴忠志、歐陽雅麗譯，\n北京：商務印書館，2007。\n十六劃\n劉小楓《柏拉圖的會飲》，北京：華夏出版社，2003。\n劉小楓〈尼采的微言大義〉，《尼采與神學》，《道風：基督教文化評論》，第十三\n期，2000，頁13-64。\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n260\n賴俊雄編《他者哲學：回歸列維納斯》，台北：麥田，2009 年。\n賴軍維〈薩德侯爵的神學關：「惡魔化」的上帝與「情色」書寫〉，《中外文學》\n33 卷，第10 期（2005/3 月）。\n賴軍維〈薩德侯爵的情色理論〉，《中外文學》34 卷，第2 期（2005/7 月）。\n十七劃\n薩林斯（Marshall Sahlins）《石器時代經濟學》，張經緯、鄭少雄、張帆譯，北京：\n三聯，2009。\n十九劃\n譚家哲《形上史論》，台北：唐山，2006 年。\n魏德驥《形上學中的存有問題—柏拉圖形上學的存有問題》，台灣大學哲學研究\n所博士論文，2004。\n二十劃\n顧迪（Jack Goody）《飲食與愛情》，楊惠君譯，台北：聯經，2004。 描述 博士
國立政治大學
哲學研究所
90154503
100資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0901545031 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 蔡錚雲 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蔡翔任 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) 蔡翔任 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2011 en_US dc.date.accessioned 2-Jan-2013 13:25:33 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 2-Jan-2013 13:25:33 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Jan-2013 13:25:33 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0901545031 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=64082 - dc.description (描述) 博士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 哲學研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 90154503 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 100 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本論文研究的是巴塔耶的普遍經濟論，它主要分四部分來探討。它首先從時間的瞬間性和能量的耗費兩個原理出發來說明什麼是普遍經濟。接著說明的是聖世界與俗世界二分的原理，這又可分兩部分來討論。從勞動與消盡的第一組對立可以產生聖俗的區分判隼，一者是勞動的超越性世界，一者是獻祭暴力的內在性世界。從禁忌與越度的第二組對立可以導出聖俗的再次區分，一者是禁忌所管轄的俗世界，一者是人性逾越的歡慶狀態。此外，普遍經濟論可以充分說明各種笑的型態，最終導向對超越的虛無性的笑。最末，本論文從死亡共同體的角度提出一種普遍經濟的友情論。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study is to discuss the theory of general economy of Georges Bataille. The argument falls into four parts. First, it accounts for what general economy means by inspecting two principles: that of instant and that of expenditure. Next, the discussion goes to what separates the sacred from the profane world. On the one hand, the profane world is dominated by work and labor which make it transcendent while the sacred immanent world is liberated from within by the representation of sacrificial violence. On the other hand, while the taboo has a command of the profane, human beings achieve and celebrate their sovereignty by transgressing the interdiction. Then, the discussion shows that general economy can have sufficient and satisfactory explanation of the morphology of laughter. Finally, it proposes a new meaning of friendship from the economic view. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 導論 人性的真實：永恆回歸的歡慶擬像 ................................................................ 5\n一、那些可笑的污穢與快活................................................................................... 5\n二、在平實人性中那些不尋常的非物..................................................................11\n三、那使俗世界夢幻顛倒的聖性......................................................................... 13\n四、那陪伴人一起面目全非的藝術..................................................................... 17\n五、永恆回歸的至高瞬間..................................................................................... 20\n六、普遍經濟論的科學性話語............................................................................. 23\n第一章 從太陽到人：普遍經濟論的視野 .............................................................. 31\n第一節 誇富宴的幻影與謎團 ............................................................................... 31\n壹、牟斯：禮物交換的形式與理據................................................................. 31\n貳、巴塔耶：喪失原理的提出......................................................................... 36\n第二節 無所用與瞬間：普遍經濟論的時間原理 ............................................... 42\n壹、系統性的界說............................................................................................. 43\n貳、何謂「經濟」？何謂「普遍」？............................................................. 45\n一、瞬間的經濟：從與列維納斯的交鋒談起............................................. 45\n二、瞬間的生命............................................................................................. 53\n參、普遍經濟有多普遍？................................................................................. 56\n第三節 耗費與差異：普遍經濟論的能量原理 ................................................... 60\n壹、 自然的揮霍：尼采的大經濟模式......................................................... 60\n貳、差異化：自然與整體性的同與異............................................................. 75\n參、主體的揮霍：薩德的色情模式................................................................. 80\n肆、小結：從耗費到差異的唯物論................................................................. 83\n第二章 聖俗二分的原理（一）：勞動與消盡 ........................................................ 87\n引言......................................................................................................................... 87\n第一節 技術與機運的對抗：俗世界的總原理 ................................................... 90\n壹、技術化的生命............................................................................................. 90\n貳、機運與風險................................................................................................. 94\n參、勞動和禁忌的異同..................................................................................... 97\n第二節 勞動與俗世界的誕生 ............................................................................... 99\n壹、超越性的設立........................................................................................... 100\n貳、勞動的主奴辯證....................................................................................... 104\n第三節 獻祭的本質：返回內在暴力 ..................................................................110\n壹、 定義之不可能........................................................................................110\n貳、物的消盡....................................................................................................113\n參、獻祭的（非）辯證....................................................................................115\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n2\n第四節聖性的異化 ............................................................................................. 121\n壹、 神靈的發生與靈肉分離....................................................................... 121\n貳、獻祭的功利化........................................................................................... 122\n參、暴力的超越化........................................................................................... 125\n肆、從聖俗到善惡........................................................................................... 127\n第三章 聖俗二分的原理（二）：禁忌與越度 ...................................................... 131\n引言....................................................................................................................... 131\n第一節 涂爾幹的聖性概念及其宗教社會學 ..................................................... 133\n壹、 聖俗二分與聖性自身之二分............................................................... 133\n貳、聖性與宗教生活的形成....................................................................... 141\n參、 對涂爾幹聖性概念的一些檢討......................................................... 147\n肆、小結....................................................................................................... 154\n第二節 巴塔耶對涂爾幹的批判與承轉：異質學與非知 ................................. 155\n第三節 禁忌的俗世界 ......................................................................................... 160\n壹、總體的視角............................................................................................... 160\n貳、禁忌的自然種類....................................................................................... 164\n一、排泄穢物............................................................................................... 165\n二、性禁忌................................................................................................... 167\n三、死亡禁忌............................................................................................... 168\n參、擬像的彼此召喚：三大禁忌的互通之處............................................... 171\n一、禁忌的非物性格................................................................................... 172\n二、禁忌的虛無性格................................................................................... 175\n第四節 越度的聖世界 ......................................................................................... 179\n壹、歡慶：至尊性的瞬間............................................................................... 179\n貳、亂倫禁忌：一個普遍經濟論的說明....................................................... 188\n一、 李維史陀的親屬關係理論及其限制............................................... 188\n二、巴塔耶的修正....................................................................................... 192\n第四章 笑與友愛 .................................................................................................... 201\n引言....................................................................................................................... 201\n第一節 笑的階梯 ................................................................................................. 201\n壹、會笑的人................................................................................................... 201\n貳、自性與交流............................................................................................... 203\n參、笑的總譜................................................................................................... 205\n一、滿足的笑............................................................................................... 206\n二、搔癢的笑............................................................................................... 206\n三、認出的笑............................................................................................... 208\n四、笑與虛無................................................................................................211\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n3\n第二節友愛與死亡共同體 ................................................................................. 219\n壹、 內在與外在的辯證............................................................................... 219\n貳、 生死與人我的餽贈............................................................................... 223\n結論 至尊性自由的可能形式 ................................................................................ 229 zh_TW dc.language.iso en_US - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0901545031 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 普遍經濟 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 耗費 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 聖性 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 越度 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 至尊性 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 獻祭 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) general economy en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) expenditure en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) sacred en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) transgression en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) sovereignty en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) sacrifice en_US dc.title (題名) 巴塔耶的普遍經濟論:耗費與聖性 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Theory of General Economy of Georges Bataille: Expenditure and the Sacred en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 參考書目\n一、 外文原著與譯著\nGeorges Bataille, OEUVRES COMPLÈTES, Paris: Gallimard,\nGeorges Bataille, The Unfinished System of Nonknowledge, edited and with an\nIntroduction by Stuart Kendall, translated by Michelle Kendall and Stuart Kendall, London:\nUniversity of Minnesota Press, 2001.\nGeorges Bataille, Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927-1939, edited and with an\nIntroduction by Allan Stoekl, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985, p. 144.\nGeorges Bataille, Theory of Religion, New York: Zone Books, 2001\nGeorges Bataille, Guilty, translated by Bruce Boone with introduction by Denis Hollier,\nThe Lapis Press, 1988\nGeorges Bataille, The Accursed Share, Volume I-III, New York: Zone Books, 1988.\nGeorges Bataille, Inner Experience, translated by Leslie Anne Boldt, New York: State\nUniversity Press, 1988.\nGeorges Bataille, On Nietzsche, translated by Bruce Boone, New York: Paragon House,\n1994.\nGeorges Bataille, Death and Sensuality: A Study of Eroticism and the Taboo, New York:\nWalker and Company, 1962.\nGeorges Bataille, The Tears of Eros, translated by Peter Connor, San Francisco: City\nLights Books, 1989.\nGeorges Bataille, The Cradle of Humanity: Prehistoric Art and Culture, edited and\nintroduced by Stuart Kendall, translated by Michelle Kendall and Stuart Kendall, New\nYork: Zone Books, 2005.\nGeorges Bataille, The Impossible: A Story of Rats followed by Dianus and by The\nOresteia, translated by Robert Hurley, San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1991.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n244\nThe College of Sociology(1937-39),edited by Denis Hollier, translated by Betsy Wing,\nMinneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988.\nThe Bataille Reader, edited by Fred Boting and Scott Wilson, Blackwell Publishers, 1998.\n二、 外文引用資料\nAgamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford\nUniversity Press, 1995.\nAmes, Kenneth M. ‘The Evolution of Social Ranking on the Northwest Coast of North\nAmerica’in American Antiquity, Vol. 46, No. 4 ( Oct., 1981), p. 795.\nAmes, Kenneth M. ‘Slaves, Chiefs and Labour on the Northern Northwest Coast’in\nWorld Archaeology, Vol. 33, No. 1, The Archaeology of Slavery (Jun., 2001), pp. 1-17.\nAnthony, Ross ‘”This is Not an Exit”: The Sacred in the Age of Consumer\nCapitalism’.\nArnould, Elisabeth, ‘ The Impoosible Sacrifice of Poetry: Bataille and the Nancian\nCritique of Sacrifice’, Diacritics, 26.2 (1996), pp. 86-96.\nArnsperger, Christian. ‘Methodological altruism as an alternative foundation for\nindividual optimization’ in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Volume 3, Number 2,\n2000.\nAvni, Ora. ‘The Semiotics of Transactions: Mauss, Lacan and the three Musketeers’in\nModern Language Notes, Vol. 100, No. 4, French Issue ( Sep., 1985), p. 744.\nBenardete, Seth. The Tragedy and Comedy of Life: Plato’s Philebus, translated and with\nCommentary by Seth Benardete, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press,\n1993, p. 83.\nBesnard, Philippe.’La formation de l’équipe de l’Anée sociologique’, Revue Française\nde sociologie. 1979, 20-1. pp. 7-31.\nBlanchot, Maurice. The Infinite Conversation, translation and foreword by Susan Hanson,\nMinneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n245\nBlanchot, Maurice.‘The Birth of Art’, Friendship, translated by Elizabeth Rottenberg,\nCalifornia: Stanford University Press, 1997\nBorch-Jacobsen, Mikkel .‘The Laughter of Being’, Modern Language Notes, Vol. 102,\nNo. 4, French Issue (Sep., 1987), pp. 737-760.\nBorgeaud, Philippe. ‘Le couple sacré/profane. Genèse et fortune d’un concept 《opé\nratoire》en histoire des religions’,in Revue de l’histoire des religions, tome 211 n˚ 4. pp.\n387-418.\nBorgerson, Janet and Alf Rehn, ‘ General Economy and Productive Dualisms’. Gender,\nWork and Organization, volume 11, issue4, July 2004. pp. 455-474.\nBras, Gabriel Le.’Note sur la sociologie religieuse dans l’Année Sociologique’,\nArchives des sciences sociales des religions. N. 21, 1966. p, 50.\nBurkert, Walter, René Girard, and Jonathan Smith, Ritual Killing and Cultural Formation,\nedited by Robert Hamerton, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.\nCaillé, Alain. ‘Apologie et critique du don. Le don entre science sociale et psychanalyse :\nL`héritage de Mauss jusqu`à Lacan’, Revue du MAUSS 1/2006(n˚ 27), p. 14.\nCaillé, Alain. ‘Don et symbolisme’, La revue du MAUSS semestrielle n˚12, Plus réel\nque le réel, le symbolisme, MAUSS/La Découverte, 1998.\nCaillé, Alain. ‘Du don comme réponse à l`énigme du don’, L’Homme, 1997, tome 37\nn˚142.\nCaillé, Alain. ‘Nouvelle thèse sur la religion’Revue du MAUSS semestrielle, 2003 (n˚\n22), p. 318-327.\nCaillé, Alain. ’Anti-utilitarianism, economics and the gift-paradigm’\nCaillé, Alain.‘Marcel Mauss et le parardigme du don’ in Sociologie et sociétés, vol. 36,\nn° 2, 2004, p. 145.\nCaillé, Alain.’Ce qu’on appelle si mal le don...Que le don est de l’ordre du don malgré\ntout’：\nhttp://www.cairn.info/revue-du-mauss-2007-2-page-393.htm，pp. 396-97.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n246\nCaillois, Roger, Man, Play, and Games, translated by Meyer Barash, New York: The Free\nPress, 1961.\nConklin, Alice L.’Civil Society, Science, and Empire in Late Republican France: The\nFoundation of Paris’s Museum of Man’, Osiris, Vol. 17, Science and Civil Society\n(2002), pp. 255-290.\nClifford, James.’On Ethnographic Surrealism’, Comparative Studies in Society and\nHistory, Vol. 23, No.4 ( Oct., 1981), pp. 539-564.\nComay, Rebecca .‘Gifts Without Presents: Economies of “Experience” in Bataille and\nHeidegger’, Yale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990), p. 89.\nCouture, André.’De l’abus de sacré dans l’édude des religions de l’Inde: De l’utilisation\nde l’opposition sacré/profane en context hindou et bouddhique’\nCrémoux, Françoise. ‘Du sacré aux sacralités’Pandora: revue d`etudes hispaniques, Nº. 4,\n2004, págs. 9-16.\nCsordas, Thomas J. ‘Asymptote of the Ineffable: Embodiment, Alterity, and the Theory of\nReligion’, Current Anthropology, Vol. 45, No. 2 (April 2004), pp. 163-185.\nDerlon, Brigitte and Marie Mauz é , ‘“Sacred”or“sensitive“ objects’Projet\nECHO – Atelier « Objets et société », sous la dir. De Maurice Godelier - Non-European\nComponents of European Patrimony –http://www.necep.net\nDerrida, Jacques. Writing and Difference, translated by Alan Bass, London and Henley:\nRoutledge, 1978.\nDerrida, Jacques .‘ Economimesis’, Diacritics, Vol. 11 (1981), translated by R. Klein, p.\n3-25.\nDescombes, Vincent.’L` Équivoque du symbolique’ Modern Language Notes, Vol. 94,\nNo. 4 (May, 1979)\nDetienne, Marcel.’Culinary Practice and the Spirit of Sacrifice’. The Cuisine of\nSacrifice among the Greeks, ed by Marcel Detienne and Jean-Pierre Vernant. Trans. Paula\nWissing, Chicago, 1989, pp. 14-20.\nDillon, John. The Middle Platonists: A Study of Platonism, 80 B.C. to A.D. 220, London:\nDuckworth, 1977.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n247\nDirek, Zeynep, ‘Bataille on Immanent and Transcendent Violence’, Bulletin de la Société\nAméricaine de Philosophie de Langue Française, Volume 14, Issue 2, Fall 2004, pp. 29-49.\nDirek, Zeynep, ‘ On the Sources and the Structure of Derrida’s Radical Notion of\nExperience’, http://www.usc.edu/dept/comp-lit/tympanum/4/direk.html\nDoroszewski, Witold.’Quelques remarques sur les rapports de la sociologie et la\nlinguistique: Durkheim et F. de Saussure’. Journal de Psychologie normale et\npathologique. Vol. 30, p. 82-91.\nDouglas, Mary. Purity and Danger, London and New York: Routledge, 2003.\nDrury, Shadia. Alexandre Kojéve: the Roots of Postmodern Politics, Palgrave MacMillan,\n1994.\nDubar, Claude.‘La méthode de Marcel Mauss’, in Revue française de sociologie. 1969,\npp. 515-521.\nDurkheim, Emil, Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse : le système totémique en\naustraile, Paris: Presses Universitires de France, 1960.\nFilloux, Jean-Claude. ‘Personne et sacré chez Durkheim’, Archives des sciences\nsociales des religions. N. 69, 1990. pp. 41-53.\nFoucault, Michel .‘A Preface to Transgression’, in Language, Counter-Memory,\nPractice: Selected Essays and Interviews, ed. With an introduction by Donald F. Bouchard,\ntrans. Donald F. Bouchard and Sherry Simon, Ithaca: Cornel Univesrity Press, 1977.\nFoucault, Michel, ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’, Language, Counter-Memory, Practice:\nSelected Essays and Interviews, edited by D. F. Bouchard, Ithaca: Cornell University Press,\n1977.\nFoucault, Michel, Religion and Culture, selected and edited by Jeremy R. Carrette.\nManchester: Manchester University Press, 1999.\nFournier, Marcel Marcel Mauss, l’ethnologie et la politique: le don, 1995.\nGans, Eric. Signs of Paradox: Irony, Resentment, and Other Mimetic Structures.Stanford:\nStanford University Press, 1997.\nGiesen, Bernhard.‘Performing Transcendence in Politics: Sovereignty, Deviance, and the\nVoid of Meaning’, Sociological Theory, Vol. 23, No. 3( Sep., 2005),.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n248\nGoody, Jack. ‘Religion and Ritual: The Definitional Problem’, The British Journal of\nSociology, Vol. 12, No. 2 (Jun., 1961)\nGousgounis, Nikos. ‘Transgressing Character of the Sacred in the Double Ritual of\nAnastenaria’, Studies of Tribes and Tribals, Vol, 1. num, 2003. p, 127-140.\nGoux, Jean-Joseph and Kathryn Ascheim, Rhonda Garelick, ‘General Economics and\nPostmodern Capitalism’, Yale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990), pp. 206-224.\nGuerlac, Suzanne, ‘ Bataille in Theory: Afterimages (Lascaux)’, Diacritics, Vol. 26, No.\n2, Georges Bataille: An Occasion for Misunderstanding (Summer, 1996), pp. 9-17.\nGuerlac, Suzanne, ‘”Recognition”by a Woman!: A Reading of Bataille’s L’Erotisme’,\nYale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990), pp.90-105.\nHabermas, Jürgen . The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, translated by Frederick\nLawrence, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.\nHarrison, Jane Ellen. Ancient Art and Ritual, London: Oxford University Press, 1951.\nHeimonet, Jean-Michel and Joaniko Kohchi, ‘ Recoil in Order to Leap Forward: Two\nValues of Sade in Bataille’s Text’, in Yale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990).\nHollier, Denis . Against Architecture: The Writings of Georges Bataille. The MIT Press,\n1992.\nHollier, Denis and Hilari Allred, ‘The Dualist Materialism of Georges Bataille’, Yale\nFrench Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990), pp. 124-139.\nDidi-Huberman, Georges. Survivance des lucioles, Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 2009.\nIgrek, Apple ‘Concrete Containment in Late Capitalism, Mysticism, the Marquis de Sade,\nand Phenomenological Anthropology’, Colloquy Text Theory Critique, No. 15 (2008), pp.\n96-114.\nIrwin, Jones. ‘Heterodox Religion and Post-Atheism: Bataille/Klossowski/Foucault’, in\nMinerva-An Internet Journal of Philosophy 10 (2006): 215-244.\nIsambert, François-Andr é . ‘L’Elaboration de la notion de sacr é dans l’ é cole\ndurkheimienne cas’, Archives des sciences sociales des religions. N. 42, 1976. pp, 35-56.\nJamin, Jean. ‘Le savant et le politique: Paul Rivet( 1876-1958)’, Bulletins et Mémoires\nde la Société d’anthropologie de Paris, Nouvelle Série, tome 1, 1989. p, 282.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n249\nJones, Robert Alun. ‘Durkheim, Frazer, and Smith: The Role of Analogies and Exemplars\nin the Development of Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion’, pp.596-627.\nJones, Robert Alun Emile Durkheim: An Introduction to Four Major Works, Beverly Hills,\nCA; Sage Publications, 1986, pp.136-37，以及\nJones, Robert Alun. ’On Understanding a Sociological Classic’, in The American\nJournal of Sociology, Vol. 83, No. 2 (Sep., 1977), pp. 308-09.\nKarady, Victor. ‘Le probl ème de la l é gitimit é dans l’organisation historique de\nl’ethnologie française’, Revue française de sociologie. 1982, 23-1. pp.17-35.\nKarady, Victor. ‘Stratégies de réussite et modes de faire-valoir de la sociologie chez les\ndurkheimiens’, Revue française de sociologie. 1979, 20-1. p, 72.\nKarady, Victor. ‘Durkheim, les sciences sociales et l’Université: bilan d’un semiéchec’.\nRevue française de sociologie. 1976, 17-2\nKarady, Victor. ‘Durkheim et les débuts de l’ethnologie universitaire’, Actes de la\nrecherche en sciences sociales. Vol. 74, 1988.\nKlossowski, Pierre .‘ A propos du simulacre dans la communication de Georges\nBataille’ , in Critique , Août-septembre 1963, p. 742.\nKlossowski, Pierre, Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle, translated by Daniel W. Smith, The\nUniversity of Chicago Press, 1997.\nKristeva, Julia Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection, translated by Leon S. Roudiez,\nNew York: Columbia University Press, 1982,\nKuper, Adam. ‘Durkheim’s theory of Primitive Kinship’. The British Journal of\nSociology, Vol. 36, No. 2 (Jun., 1985), p. 231.\nLacoue-Labarthe, Philippe. Heidegger, Art and Politics: The Fiction of the Political,\ntranslated by Chris Turner, Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1990.\nLassègue, Jean and Victor Rosenthal & Yves-Marie Visetti, ‘Économie symbolique et\nphylogenèse du langage’. L`HOMME 192/2009\nLassègue, Jean. ‘Archéologie de la fonction symbolique: quelques pistes récentes’(expos\né au séminaire’ Formes Symboliques’18 octobre 2005)\nLawtoo, Nidesh .‘Bataille and the Suspension of Being’, Lingua Romana: a journal of\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n250\nFrench, Italian and Romanian culture, volume 4, issue 1/fall 2005.\nLévi-Strauss, Claude. ‘Introduction à l’oeuvre de Marcel Mauss’,in Marcel Mauss,\nSociologie et Anthropologie, précédé d’une Introduction à l’oeuvre de Marcel Mauss par\nClaude Lévi-Strauss, Paris: P.U.F., 1950.\nLévi-Strauss, Claude. ‘ L’efficacité symbolique’, Revue de l’histoire des religions, 1949,\nvol. 135, pp. 5-27.\nLévi-Strauss, Claude. ‘La sexualité féminine et l`origine de la société’, Temps Modernes,\nn˚ 598, mars-avril 1998, p.66-84.\nLibertson, Joseph ‘ Excess and Imminence: Transgression in Bataille’, in MLN, Vol.\n92, No. 5, Compartive Literature (Dec., 1977), p. 1005.\nLibertson, Joseph. ‘Bataille and Communication: Savoir, Non-Savoir, Glissement, Rire’\nin Leslie Anne Boldt-Irons (ed.) On Bataille: Critical Essays, Albany: State University of\nNew York Press, 1995, p. 209.\nMarcel, Jean-Christophe. ‘Bataille et Mauss: un dialogue de sourds?’. Temps modernes,\nno. 602, 1999\nMarshall, Douglas A. ‘Durkheimian Dualism Redux: Homo Duplex and the Origins of\nReligion’\nMasuzawa, Tomoko. ‘The Sacred Difference in the Elementary Forms: On Durkheim’s\nLast Quest’. Representations, No. 23 (Summer, 1988), pp. 25-50.\nMauss, Marcel. Essai sur le don: forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques.\nIn Sociologie et anthropologie, Presses Universitaires de France, 1995.\nMehlman, Jeffrey. ‘The “Floating Signifier”: From Lévi-Strauss to Lacan’, Yale\nFrench Studies, No. 48, French Freud: Structural Studies in Psychoanalysis (1972)\nMeltzer, Françoise .‘On the Question of Aufhebung: Baudelaire, Bataille and Sartre’,\nRCCS, no. 75 (October 2006), p. 9.\nMoebius, Stephan.’Über die kollektive Repräsentation des Lebens und des Sakralen: Die\nVerknüpfung von Durkheim und Nietzsche in Geschichte und Gegenwart der Soziologie\nund Kulturanthropologie’, p. 3.\nNietzsche, Friedrich . Jenseits von Gut und Böse, Zur Genealogie der Moral, Kritische\nStudienausgabe Herausgegeben von Giorgio Colli und Mazzino Montinari, Deutscher\nTaschenbuch Verlag de Gruyter, 1988.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n251\nNoys, Benjamin .Georges Bataille: A Critical Introduction, London: Pluto Press, 2000, pp.\nPanoff, Michel.‘ Marcel Mauss’s “The Gift” Revisited’, in Man, New Series, Vol. 5,\nNo. 1 (Mar., 1970), p. 61.\nPaoletti, Giovanni .’Durkheim et le problème de l’objectivité: une lecture des Formes él\némentaires de la vie religieuse’, Revue française de sociologie. 2002, 43-3. pp.\n437-459.\nParsons, Talcott Essays in Sociological Action. New York: Glencoe, 1954\nPettit, Philip. ‘Agency-freedom and Option-freedom’, Journal of Theoretical Politics\n15(4), pp. 387-403.\nPickering, W. S. F. Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion: Themes and Theories, London:\nRoutledge and Kegan Paul, 1984\nPickering, W. S. F. ‘The Eternality of the Sacred: Durkheim’s Error?’. Archives des\nsciences socials des religions. N. 69, 1990.\nPizzorno, Akssandro.‘Politics Unbound.’ In Changing Boundaries of the Political.\nedited by Charles Maier, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1987.\nPoulet, Régis. ‘Les réponses érotiques de l’art préhistorique: un éclairage bataillien’,\ndimanche 12 septembre 2010. 網址：\nhttp://www.larevuedesressources.org/les-reponses-erotiques-de-l-art-prehistorique-un-eclair\nage-bataillien,605.html\nPrades, José . ‘La Religion de l’humanité: Notes sur l’anthropo-centrisme durkheimien’.\nArchives des sciences sociales des religions. N. 69, 1990. pp.55-68.\nRamel, Fréd é ric. ‘Lévi-Strauss et les relations etrangeres des tribus primitives’.\nKlesis-Revue philosophique/ Hommage a Claude Lévi-Strauss, 10, 2008.\nRaschke, Carl. “Bataille’s Gift.” Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory vol. 5 no. 1\n(December 2003): pp. 1-8.\nRauch, Leo and David Sherman, Phenomenology of Self-Consciousness: Text and\nCommentary, New York: State University of New York Press, 1999.\nRenfrew, Colin. ‘Neuroscience, evolution and the sapient paradox: the factuality of value\nand of the sacred’ in The Sapient Mind: Archaeology Meets Neuroscience, Oxford\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n252\nUniversity Press, 2009, pp. 165-176.\nRichardson, Michael Georges Bataille, London and New York: Routledge, 1994\nRichman, Michèle. ‘The sacred group: A Durkeimian perspective on the Collège de\nsociologie’, Bataille: Writing the sacred, edited by Carolyn Bailey Gill, London and\nNew York: Routledge, 1995\nRiley, Alexander T. ‘Renegade Durkheimianism” and the Transgressive/Left Sacred’, p.\n2. in The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim , Edited by: Jeffrey C. Alexander and Philip\nSmith, 2005.\nRiley, Alexander T. ‘The Institutional ‘Missing Links’ in the Genealogical Tree\nConnecting Durkheim to Foucault: A Micro-Sociology of the Journals and Personal\nRelationships that Made Poststructuralism Durkheimian ‘Paper presented at the annual\nmeeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal Convention Center, Montreal,\nQuebec, Canada, Aug 10, 2006\nRiley, Alexander T. ‘Renegade Durkheimianism” and the Transgressive/Left Sacred’,\np.12. in The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim , Edited by: Jeffrey C. Alexander and\nPhilip Smith, 2005.\nRiley, Alexander T. ‘The Sacred Calling of Intellectual Labor in Mystic and Ascetic\nDurkheimianism’European Journal of Sociology (2002), 43: 354-385\nRiley, Alexander T. ‘The Intellectural and Political Project of Robert Hertz: The\nMaking of a Peculiar Durkheimian Intellectual, as seen through Selected Correspondence\nwith Pierre Roussel’ Durkheimian Studies, vol. 5, n.s., 1999:29-59.\nRiley, Alexander T.’Durkheim vs. Bergson? The Hidden Roots of Postmodern Theory\nand The Postmodern ‘Return’ of the Sacred’. Sociological Perspectives. Vol 45, 2002,\npp.257.\nRiley, Alexander T.’Whence Durkheim’s Nietzschean Grandchildren ?: A Closer Look\nat Robert Hertz’s Place in the Durkheimian Geneaolgy’in Archives européenes de\nsociologie/European Journal of Sociology, 40:2, 1999:110-137.\nRobertson, Fabien’Durkheim: Entre religion et morale’,p. 127-132.\nRoss, Marina Davila and Michael Owren, Elke Zimmermann, ‘ Reconstructing the\nEvolution of Laughter in Great Apes and Humans’, Current Biology, Vol19, No 13, 2009,\npp. 1-6.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n253\nStaum, Martin. ‘Nature and Nuture in French Ethnography and Anthropology,\n1859-1914’, Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 65, No. 3(2004), pp. 475-495.\nSteiner, Philippe. ‘Religion et économie. Mauss, Simiand et le programme durkheimien’,\nin Revue française de sociologie. 2001, 42-4. pp. 695-718.\nStoekl, Allan. ‘Truman’s Apotheosis: Bataille, “Planisme,” and Headlessness’,\nYale French Studies, No. 78, On Bataille (1990), pp. 181-205.\nSumpf, Joseph. ‘Durkheim et le problème de l’étude sociologique de la religion’,\nArchives des sciences sociales des religions. N. 20m 1965, p.63.\nSumpf, Joseph. ‘Linguistique et sociologie’, in Languages, 3e année, n11, 1968\nSurkis, Judith, ‘No Fun and Games Until Someone Loses an Eye: Transgression and\nMasculinity in Bataille and Foucault’, Diacritics, 26.2 (1996), pp. 18-30.\nSzlezák, Thomas A. Reading Plato, translated by Graham Zanker, London and New York:\nRoutledge, 1993\nTarot, Camille Le symbolisme et le sacré: théorie de la religion ÉDITIONS LA\nDÉCOUVERTE/M.A.U.S.S. Paris, 2008.\nTarot, Camille. ‘Religion, faut-il avoir peur de qui et de quoi?’ In Revue du MAUSS,\n2008，網路連結見：http://www.journaldumauss.net/spip.php?article424\nTarot, Camille. ‘Don et grâce, une famille à recomposer?’in Gifts and Interest, Louvain,\nPeeters,\nTeixeira, Vincent. Georges Bataille, La part de l’art (la peinture du non-savoir), Paris:\nl’Harmattan, Ouverture Philosophique, 1997\nTestart , Alain and Amy Jacobs, ‘The extent and significance of debt slavery’in Revue\nfrançaise de sociologie. 2002, 43-1. pp. 173-204.\nUngar, Steven, ‘Phantom Lascaux: Origin of the Work of Art’, Yale French Studies,\nNo. 78, On Bataille (1990)< pp. 246-262.\nUricoechea, Fernando. ‘Durkheim’s Conception of the Religious Life: a Critique’, in\nArchives des sciences sociales des religions. N. 79, 1992.\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n254\nVogt, W. Paul. ‘The Uses of Studying Primitives: A Note on the Durkheimans,\n1890-1940’in History and Theory, Vol. 15, No. 1(1976), pp. 33-44.\nWeiner, Annette B. ‘Inalienable Wealth’in American Ethnologist, Vol. 12, No. 2( May,\n1985), pp. 210-227.\nWeiss, Allen S. ‘Impossible Sovereignty: Between “The Will to Power” and “The\nWill to Chance”’, October, Vol. 36, Georges Bataille: Writings on Laughter, Sacrifice,\nNietzsche, Un-Knowing. (Spring, 1986),\nWhite, Richard ‘Bataille on Lascaux and the Origin of Art’, in Janus Head, pp. 319-331.\n網址見：http://www.janushead.org/11-2/White.pdf\nWilde, Oscar, De Profundis and Other Writings, London: Penguin Books, 1986.\nZerilli, Filippo M. ‘Du déménagement comme coupure épistémologique. Durkheim and\nethnographical sources’in Revue européenne des sciences sociales, Numéro 129 (2004):\nLa sociologie durkheimienne: tradition et actualité.\n三、中文參考資料\n1. 巴塔耶的著作中譯\n《情色論》，賴守正譯，台北：聯經，2012。\n《色情史》，劉暉譯，北京：商務，2003。\n《色情、耗費與普遍經濟：喬志․巴塔耶文選》。汪民安編，吉林人民出版社，\n2003。\n2. 其他中文參考資料\n三劃\n子安宣邦《國家與祭祀》，董炳月譯，北京：三聯，2007。\n四劃\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n255\n毛斯（Marcel Mauss）《禮物》，汲喆譯，上海：人民出版社，2002。\n毛斯（Marcel Mauss）《社會學與人類學》，余碧平譯，上海：上海譯文出版社，\n2003。\n布勒東（André Breton）《超現實主義宣言》，袁俊生譯，重慶：重慶大學出版社，\n2010。\n巴特（Roland Barthes）《符號禪意東洋風》，孫乃修譯，台北：台灣商務印書館，\n民國82 年。\n五劃\n尼采（Friedrich Nietzsche）《扎拉圖斯特拉如是說》，黃明嘉、樓林譯，上海：華\n東師範大學出版社，2009。\n尼采（Friedrich Nietzsche）《朝霞》，田立年譯，上海：華東師範大學出版社，2007。\n布朗（Norman Oliver Brown）《生與死的對抗》，馮川、伍厚愷譯，貴陽：貴州人\n民出版社，1994。\n古德利爾（Maurice Godelier）《禮物之謎》，王毅譯，上海：上海人民出版社，2007\n年。\n卡西勒（Ernst Cassirer）《語言與神話》，于曉 等譯，台北：桂冠，2002。\n卡西爾（Ernst Cassirer）《神話思維》，黃龍保、周振 選譯，北京：中國社會科學\n出版社，1992。\n加藤秀俊《餘暇社會學》，彭德中譯，台北：遠流，1989。\n古迪（Jack Goody）《烹飪、菜餚與階級》，王榮欣、沈南山譯，浙江：浙江大學\n出版社，2010。\n皮柏（Josef Pieper）《閒暇：文化的基礎》，劉森堯譯，台北：立緒，2003。\n六劃\n伊森˙克萊茵伯格（Ethan Kleinberg）《存在的一代：海德格爾哲學在法國\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n256\n1927-1961》，陳穎譯，北京：新星出版社，2010。\n七劃\n克里斯蒂娃（Julia Kristeva）《恐怖的權力：論卑賤》，北京：三聯，2001。\n佛洛依德（Sigmund Freud）《圖騰與禁忌》，台北：志文出版社，1989。\n克羅絲（Rosalind E. Krauss）《前衛的原創性》，連德誠譯，台北：遠流，1995。\n克萊蒙（Catherine B.-Clement）、布律諾（Pierre Bruno）、賽弗（Lucien Seve）《馬\n克思主義與心理分析》，徐更高譯，台北：南方，民國77 年。\n余德慧《生命夢屋》，台北：張老師，2010 年。\n余德慧《生死學十四講》，台北：心靈工坊，2003。\n余德慧〈探討癌末處境「聖世界」的形成〉，《生死學研究》第三卷，嘉義：南華\n大學，2006，頁1-58。\n牟宗三《才性與玄理》，台北：學生書局，2002。\n牟斯（Marcel Mauss）《禮物：舊社會中交換的形式與功能》汪珍宜、何翠萍譯，\n台北：遠流（新橋譯叢17），2001。\n李維史陀（Claude Lévi-Strauss）《廣闊的視野》，肖津等譯，台北：桂冠，2004。\n杜蒙（Louis Dumont）《階序人》，王志明譯，台北：遠流，2007。\n李區（Edmund Leach）《上緬甸諸政治體制》，張恭啟、黃道琳譯，台北：唐山，\n民國92。\n李基（Richard Leakey）《人類傳奇》，楊玉齡譯，台北：天下文化，1995。\n李建漳〈「大政治」及「未來哲學」的同一性：對尼采整體哲學的一個詮釋〉《台\n大文史哲學報》，第七十三期，2010 年11 月。\n芮克里夫-布朗（A. R. Radcliife-Brown）《社會人類學方法》，夏建中，台北：桂冠，\n1991。\n伊利亞德（Mircea Eliade）《聖與俗—宗教的本質》，楊素娥譯，台北：桂冠，2000。\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n257\n八劃\n阿岡本（Giorgio Agamben）《例外狀態》，薛熙平譯，台北：麥田，2010。\n阿倫特，漢娜（Hannah Arendt）《精神生活˙意志》，姜志輝譯，南京：江蘇教育\n出版社，2006。\n阿姆斯壯（Karen Armstrong）《神的歷史》，蔡昌雄譯，台北：立緒，2000。\n拉德克立夫-布朗（A. R. Radcliife-Brown）《原始社會的結構與功能》，潘蛟、王賢\n海、劉文遠、知寒譯，北京：中央民族大學出版社，1999。\n果德里耶（Maurice Godelier），〈李維史陀：馬克思及馬克思之後？重新估價結構\n主義和馬克思主義方法論：一個社會邏輯分析〉，張寧譯，《當代》，第57 期，1991，\n一月。\n佩爾尼奧拉（Mario Perniola）《儀式思維》，呂捷譯，北京：商務，2006。\n佩迪特（Philip Pettit）《共和主義》，南京：江蘇人民出版社，2006。\n昆德拉，米蘭（Milan Kundera）《被背叛的遺囑》，香港：牛津大學出版社，1993。\n昆德拉，米蘭《笑忘書》，尉遲秀譯，台北：皇冠，2002。\n帕茲（Octavio Paz）《雙重火焰》，台北：邊城，2004。\n帕斯（Octavio Paz）《帕斯選集》，北京：作家出版社，2006。\n九劃\n柏拉圖《巴曼尼德斯篇》陳康譯，北京：商務出版社，1997。\n珍古德（Jane Goodall）《與牠為伴：非洲叢林三十年》，台北：格林，1996。\n胡蘭成《今日何日兮》，台北：三三書坊，民79 年。\n十劃\n涂爾幹（Emil Durkheim）《宗教生活的基本形式》，芮傳明、趙學元譯，台北：桂\n冠，1992。\n涂爾幹（Emil Durkheim）《宗教生活的基本形式》，渠東、汲喆譯，上海：人民出\n版社，2010。\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n258\n涂爾幹（Emil Durkheim）《亂倫禁忌及其起源》，汲喆、付德根、渠東譯，渠東、\n梅非校，上海：人民出版社，2003。\n莫斯（Marcel Mauss）《人類學與社會學五講》，桂林：廣西師範大學，2008。\n馬林諾斯基（B. Malinowski）《南海舡人》，于嘉雲譯，台北：遠流（新橋譯叢），\n1991。\n馬林諾斯基（B. Malinowski）《神聖的性生活》，何勇譯，北京：知識出版社，1998。\n馬累德（R. R. Marett）《心理學與民俗學》，曾召銘譯，台北：結構群，1990。\n莎蒂亞˙德魯里（Shadia Drury）《亞歷山大˙科耶夫：後現代政治的根源》，趙琦\n譯，北京：新星出版社，2007。\n倫弗瑞（Colin Renfrew）《史前：文明記憶拼圖》，張明玲譯，台北：貓頭鷹，2010。\n海德（Lewis Hyde）《禮物的美學：藝術經濟理論的新主張》，台北：商周，2008。\n十一劃\n韋伯（Max Weber）《宗教社會學》，康樂、簡惠美譯，台北：遠流，1993 年。\n韋伯（Max Weber）《支配社會學II》，康樂、簡惠美譯，台北：遠流，1993 年。\n韋納（Annette Weiner）〈不可異化的財富〉，收錄在童元昭主編《群島之洋：人類\n學的大洋洲研究》，台北：商務，2009，頁115-148。\n朗佩特（Laurence Lampert）《尼采的使命：善惡的彼岸解讀》，李致遠、李小均譯，\n北京：華夏出版社，2009。\n埃文斯-普李查德（E. E. Evans-Pritchard）《原始宗教理論》，孫尚揚譯，北京：商\n務印書館，2001。\n菲立普，亞當（Adam Phillips）《吻、搔癢與煩悶》，陳信宏譯，台北：究竟，2000。\n袁瓊瓊〈我一直懷疑〉，《壹週刊》，No. 571, 2012, 5/3, pp. 138-39.\n十二劃\n納斯鮑姆（Martha Nussbaum）《善的脆弱性》，徐向東、陸萌譯，上海：譯林出版\n社，2007。\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n259\n斯勒扎克（Thomas Szlezak）《讀柏拉圖》，程煒譯，上海：譯林出版社，2009。\n湯淺博雄，《巴塔耶：消盡》，趙漢英譯，河北：河北教育出版社，2001 年。\n勞思光《新編中國哲學史》，台北：三民，民國80 年。\n黃胤毓〈滲透太陽（身體）的攝影機介質—論三島由紀夫影像肉體論的內攝與官\n能燔〉，《文化研究月報》，109 期，Oct. 2010，頁1-29。\n喜戒禪師《佛陀親授四正念的四個練習》，賴隆彥譯，台北：橡樹林，2005。\n彭羅斯（Roger Penrose）《皇帝新腦》，許明賢、吳忠超譯，台北：藝文印書館，\n民國82 年。\n十四劃\n蔡錚雲《從現象學到後現代》，台北：三民，1995。\n蔡淑玲〈巴岱儀的否定與逾越〉，《中外文學》，第24 卷，第2 期，1995 年7 月，\n頁116-127。\n赫爾茲，羅伯特（Robert Hertz）《死亡與右手》，吳鳳玲譯，上海：上海人民出版\n社，2011。\n十五劃\n蔣年豐《與西洋哲學對話》，台北：桂冠，2005。\n德貢布，文森特（Vincent Descombes）《當代法國哲學》，北京：新星出版社，2007。\n諾齊克（Robert Nozick）《經過省查的人生—哲學沈思錄》，嚴忠志、歐陽雅麗譯，\n北京：商務印書館，2007。\n十六劃\n劉小楓《柏拉圖的會飲》，北京：華夏出版社，2003。\n劉小楓〈尼采的微言大義〉，《尼采與神學》，《道風：基督教文化評論》，第十三\n期，2000，頁13-64。\n‧\n國\n立\n政\n治\n大\n學\n‧\nN at i o na l Ch en gc h i U n i ve r s i t y\n260\n賴俊雄編《他者哲學：回歸列維納斯》，台北：麥田，2009 年。\n賴軍維〈薩德侯爵的神學關：「惡魔化」的上帝與「情色」書寫〉，《中外文學》\n33 卷，第10 期（2005/3 月）。\n賴軍維〈薩德侯爵的情色理論〉，《中外文學》34 卷，第2 期（2005/7 月）。\n十七劃\n薩林斯（Marshall Sahlins）《石器時代經濟學》，張經緯、鄭少雄、張帆譯，北京：\n三聯，2009。\n十九劃\n譚家哲《形上史論》，台北：唐山，2006 年。\n魏德驥《形上學中的存有問題—柏拉圖形上學的存有問題》，台灣大學哲學研究\n所博士論文，2004。\n二十劃\n顧迪（Jack Goody）《飲食與愛情》，楊惠君譯，台北：聯經，2004。 zh_TW
