| dc.contributor | 政大新聞系 | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 徐美苓;楊意菁 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2011-07 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 9-Jan-2013 10:02:01 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 9-Jan-2013 10:02:01 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 9-Jan-2013 10:02:01 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/56620 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本研究旨在分析全球暖化報導的應然表現，以釐清科技風險與媒體再現間的相關問題。透過對四家主流報紙 2006 年 1 月至 2009 年 4 月間的新聞內容分析，以及八名環境記者的深度訪談，我們發現各媒體在暖化報導上有其特色，溝通訊息呈現的優缺點亦各有軒輊。屬必要條件的缺點不多，但能通過優質訊息標準檢視者也非多數。台灣的暖化新聞內容多呈現單一觀點，並多支持暖化論。受訪記者對新聞內容分析結果的實務考量則提供了進一步詮釋。本研究最後針對研究意涵，提出未來相關研究建議與限制。 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This study aims to analyze and evaluate how the global warming-related risks have been covered in the news media and why. Data collection methods included a content analysis of four Taiwanese mainstream newspapers’ coverage from January 1, 2006 to April 30, 2009, together with in-depth personal interviews with eight environmental journalists. The content analysis results show that each newspaper was distinguished in its news coverage of global warming. Four newspapers were also strong and weak in various aspects of items considered to be sufficient and necessary criteria in evaluating news quality of science-risk reports. Taiwanese news media mostly represented one view, mainly the anthropogenic explanation of global warming in its coverage. The interviewed journalists further provided interpretations from the perspective of news routines. The study ends with discussions of the implications, future research directions, and limitations of the findings. | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 中華傳播學會研討會研討會, 中華傳播學會研討會 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 內容分析;全球暖化;科技風險;科學傳播;深度訪談;新聞報導 | - |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | content analysis; global warming; science risk; science communication; in-depth interview; news coverage | - |
| dc.title (題名) | 科技風險與全球暖化報導品質分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | conference | en |
