| dc.contributor.advisor | 苑守慈 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yuan, Soe Tsyr | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 黃百富 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Hwang, Bair Fuh | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 黃百富 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Hwang, Bair Fuh | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2012 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 1-Mar-2013 09:25:04 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 1-Mar-2013 09:25:04 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 1-Mar-2013 09:25:04 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0098932070 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/57049 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA) | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 98932070 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 101 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 近二十年來，環境低碳永續思潮可謂國際城市規劃顯學，各國在城鄉及建築規劃領域之設計思維及技術手法也積極提升，日益精進。台灣政府也不自外於此風潮，施政走向積極回應此地球公民責任，將節能減碳、綠色永續列為政府規劃標案之關鍵議題。工程顧問業面對此項國際競爭挑戰，應透過設計思考程序來養成工程師永續思維，建立解析環境永續低碳議題之整合規劃能力，為本研究之主要研究動機與目的。本研究爰引歐盟生態城市規劃流程為基礎，導入設計思考理念與手法，建立一套具備全球生態城市規劃思潮、可科學化具體操作雙重特點之整合規劃作業程序。同時，透過平潭總體規劃國際競圖案之實際操練，讓設計團隊體驗在嚴謹的論證前提框架內，藉由科學程序引導，激發出創新提案，也讓設計者體認到整合規劃之必須與重要度。建置永續城市規劃整合模型亦為本研究之重要成果，主要功能係可檢核運算規劃方案對生態永續層面之達成率。此整合模型以歐盟生態城市規劃流程為主要框架，再納入國內生態社區評估系統之分項指標，兼俱國際前瞻思潮、與國內既有評估系統儘量相容兩項特性。另為因應不同規模尺度規劃任務之精細度要求，將整合模型區分成快速評估及詳實評估兩種版本，並以江蘇啟東濱江新城總體規劃案進行快速評估版之實證演算。本研究將設計思考導入城市規劃實質作業，誠屬首創，研究成果所建立之整合規劃作業程序與永續城市規劃整合模型，亦屬城市規劃在製程(Process)與供應(Offering)兩類項之創新突破。未來，將持續進行相關專業評估指標之細化、模型執行電腦程式化、成果數值轉化等模型優化擴充，俾使成為引導永續規劃之重要專業工具，戮力工程顧問應盡之企業社會責任。關鍵詞：生態城市規劃流程、設計思考、永續城市規劃 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | During the past two decades, the low-carbon-emission and sustainability should be the two most important issues of urban planning, while all the theory and technical approach related to urban planning are enhanced increasingly sophisticated. Taiwan government is also engaged in this trend. For actively responding to the responsibility as an international citizen, energy saving, carbon reduction, and green sustainable development are requested as key issues of government tenders. Facing these international challenges, how engineering consultancy to develop the integrated planning capability through design thinking process to resolve environmental sustainability and low-carbon agenda, is the principal motive and purpose of this research.Based on the EU eco-city planning process, the integrated planning standard process is established through the concept of design thinking and practices. The global eco-city planning concept and scientific specific operation are both characteristics of this comprehensive planning procedure. Besides, through the practical exercises of Ping-tan conceptual master planning international competition, the design team is experienced how an innovation proposal could be created in this rigorous scientific procedure and the synergy of integrated planning.Establishing the sustainable urban planning integrated model is the important result of this research. This model could evaluate the sustainability commitment of each planning alternatives. The model is developed with the main framework of the EU eco-city planning process and detailed indicators of EEWH-EC model. Taking into account the international forward-looking thought and compatible with the local EEWH-EC model are two significant characteristic of this integrated model. This integrated model is functionally developed into two versions, rapid assessment and detailed assessment, to cope with the different scale of planning tasks. In addition, the rapid assessment version is implemented for the Qi-Dong Riverside new district conceptual master planning project.In this research, the design thinking initiated into urban planning process is a pioneering undertaking. The two findings of this research, integrated planning standard process and sustainable urban planning integrated model, are having innovation breakthrough each other in process and offering of urban planning. The further expansion of the model, Including professional assessment indicators refinement, computer programming implementation, and the output solution formation, will be continued. In the future, the model is expected to be optimized as an important tool for urban planning. It will be the best practice of corporate social responsibility for engineering consultancy.Keywords：eco-city planning process, design thinking, sustainable urban planning | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與研究動機 1 壹、 研究背景 1 貳、 研究動機 1 第二節 研究問題與目的 3 第三節 研究方法與流程 4第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 生態城市的永續規劃思維 5 壹、 環境永續的全球醒思 5 貳、 城市實踐生態低碳的歷程與趨勢 6 第二節 生態城市的擘劃 8 壹、 歐盟生態城市策劃 8 貳、 臺灣推動低碳生態城市歷程 13 第三節 全球前瞻公司的努力 18 壹、 AECOM SSIM Model 18 貳、 ARUP SPeAR Assessment Tool 21 參、 台灣EEWH-EC 評估系統 22 第四節 設計思考 (Design Thinking) 26 壹、 設計思考概念與綜效 26 貳、 HCD (Human Centered Design) 27 參、 設計思考程序引導手法 29第三章 整合規劃作業程序建置 35 第一節 中興公司概要 35 壹、 企業沿革與專業分工之必需 35 貳、 技術優化與跨域整合之必然 36 第二節 導入設計思考，建立整合規劃作業程序 37 壹、 整合規劃作業程序所呈現之特點 37 貳、 整合規劃作業程序之操練 40第四章 永續城市規劃整合模型建置與實證演算 53 第一節 模型功能及架構發想 53 第二節 永續城市規劃整合模型原型建置 55 第三節 模型實證演算 60第五章 結論與建議 68第一節 研究結論 68第二節 後續研究建議 70參考文獻 72 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098932070 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 生態城市規劃流程 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 設計思考 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 永續城市規劃 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | eco-city planning process | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | design thinking | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | sustainable urban planning | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 永續城市規劃整合模型之建置 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | The establishment of sustainable urban planning integrated model | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 參考文獻 中文部份 1. ARUP，上海東灘生態城計畫簡報，2007。 2. 中華民國地區發展協會，生態城市都市設計操作手冊之研究，2009。 3. 內政部建築研究所，生態社區解說與評估手冊，2010。 4. 中興工程顧問顧股份有限公司，平潭綜合實驗區概念性總體規劃國際競圖，2010。 5. 提姆‧布朗，設計思考改造世界，聯經出版社，2010年。 6. 行政院環保署，我國低碳城市遴選評比之經驗分享，2011。 7. AECOM，永續系統整合模型簡介，2011。 8. 中興工程顧問顧股份有限公司，江蘇啟東濱江新城概念性總體規劃及城市設計，2012。英文部份 1. IDEO, HCD TOOLKIT, 2nd Edition. 2. Roberto Verganti, Design-Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean, Harvard Business Press Books, 2009. 3. Larry Keeley, Ten Types of Innovation, IBF, International Business Forum, 2011. 4. RobertoVerganti, Design-Driven Innovation: an Introduction, Harvard Business Press Chapters, 2009. 5. Aleda V Roth; Larry J Menor, Insights into Service Operations Management: A Research Agenda, Production and Operations Management; 12(2), 145-164, 2003.網路部份 1. Syntagm Ltd., The Perfect User, © Copyright 1995-2012. 2. http://blog.88tc88.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Design-Thinking_1.jpg 3. Institute of Design at Stanford,http://dschool.stanford.edu/use-our-methods/empathy-map 4. Concept Mapping, http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/isd/learning_concept_map2.png 5. Institute of Design at Stanford,http://dschool.stanford.edu/use-our-methods/prototype-to-test | zh_TW |
