1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Foreign Languages and Literature
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 場地獨立/場地依賴學習風格與高中生英語閱讀策略運用之研究
A study of FI /FD learners’ learning styles and the use of English reading strategies in EFL senior high school
作者 高永欽
Kao, Yung Ching
貢獻者 林啟一
Lin, Chi Yee
高永欽
Kao, Yung Ching
關鍵詞 學習風格
場地獨立
場地依賴
閱讀策略
learning
FD
FI
stylereading strategies
日期 2011
上傳時間 1-Mar-2013 09:27:30 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究的目的是透過閱讀策略的教學，探討場地依賴/場地獨立學習風格與高中生閱讀策略使用的關係。研究對象是75位桃園縣二所高中三年級的學生。主要研究工具包括：用以測量學生學習風格的鑲嵌圖形測驗、了解起始點是否一致的全民英檢中級閱讀測驗及一份用於前、後測的閱讀理解測驗，以及一份用來瞭解學生在教學前後閱讀策略使用改變情形的閱讀策略問卷，最後進行一份教學後回饋問卷以了解學生對於此實驗教學的態度及觀感。
研究過程分為三個階段。第一階段：執行閱讀測驗前測及閱讀策略問卷前測。閱讀測驗前測是為了瞭解受試者起始點的語言程度;閱讀策略問卷前測則是為了瞭解不同學習風格的學生，在實驗教學前閱讀策略的使用情形；第二階段：實施場地依賴/場地獨立學習風格教學、閱讀策略教學、85年至100年歷屆學測及指考閱讀測驗題型分析與練習。場地依賴/場地獨立學習風格教學是為了介紹學習風格並讓學生瞭解自己學習風格的優勢與侷限；閱讀策略教學的目的是為了介紹整體型及局部型的閱讀策略，讓學生瞭解在實際的閱讀過程中有那些策略可供運用；85年至100年歷屆閱讀測驗題型分析是為了讓學生掌握閱讀測驗的考題趨勢，練習是要讓學生熟悉使用這些閱讀策略；第三階段：執行閱讀測驗後測、閱讀策略問卷後測及教學回饋問卷。閱讀測驗後測是為了瞭解實驗教學的成效;閱讀策略問卷後測是為了瞭解不同學習風格的學習者，在經過十八週的閱讀策略教學後，在整體型及局部型的那些閱讀策略使用上產生顯著的差異;教學回饋問卷則是為了進一步了解學生對於閱讀策略教學之觀感並尋求教學改進上的建議。
根據研究結果，主要的發現如下:
(1)此「閱讀策略教學」實驗，對場地依賴與場地獨立學習者的英語閱讀理解成績皆有正面影響；場地獨立學習者較場地依賴學習者進步尤為顯著。
(2)不同的學習風格確會造成學習者在整體型及局部型閱讀策略上使用的不同。經過「閱讀策略教學」後，[相同之處]－在閱讀策略的使用：注意引言段、主要論述段及結論段、注意第一段的每一句話（特別是主旨陳述）、注意最後一段的每一句話以瞭解篇章內容、注意作者如何撰寫第一段以引起讀者興趣及注意出現同位語之處，無論是場地依賴或場地獨立的學習者，都出現顯著性的閱讀策略使用改變。[相異之處]－場地依賴學習風格的學習者，在運用整體型閱讀策略：注意作者如何撰寫最後一段，及在運用局部型閱讀策略：注意有無表達比較或對照、注意有無表達原級、比較級或最高級、注意有無表達說明、解釋或換言之的閱讀策略使用上，表現不同於場地獨立學習風格的學習者；而場地獨立學習風格的學習者，在運用整體型閱讀策略：注意作者的寫作目的、注意表達作者風格、語調、態度、立場或觀點之處、注意推斷出文章可能的來源及出處，及在運用局部型閱讀策略：注意有無表達方位順序、注意有無表達讓步、注意出現特殊體例之處、注意出現倒裝句、注意出現加強語氣之處的閱讀策略使用，表現不同於場地依賴學習風格的學習者。
(3)不同的學習風格確會影響學習者在不同閱讀測驗題型上的表現。在「閱讀策略教學」後，場地依賴學習風格的學習者，在運用整體型閱讀策略：文章風格/作者態度、推論題型，以及在運用局部型閱讀策略：粗體單字題型上表現較佳；而場地獨立學習風格的學習者，則在運用整體型閱讀策略：主旨題、作者的寫作目的，以及在運用局部型閱讀策略的細節題及指涉題型上表現較佳。
(4)在接受「閱讀策略教學」後，無論是場地依賴或場地獨立，大部份的受試者都給予正面肯定的評價；對閱讀較有信心；對長篇文章不再那麼畏懼；對於場地依賴/場地獨立學習風格的教學普遍認同。然對於「閱讀策略教學」在英文寫作上的助益，贊成者與態度保留者幾占各半比率；對於學習風格的教學時機因大考在即，多持謹慎保留態度。受試者也表達了他們對於最有幫助及最困難的整體型及局部型閱讀策略的看法。
根據本研究的發現，研究者在文末提出數點教學建議及未來相關研究方向。
The present study aims to probe into the relationship between FD/FI learning styles and reading strategy use through RSI. Seventy five students of two 12th-grade senior high school classes in Tao-Yuan County were selected as one field dependent (FD) group and one field independent (FI) group. Five instruments were used: Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT), General English Proficiency Test (GEPT), a reading strategy questionnaire (Questionnaire I), a pre-and post-test, and a students’ responses questionnaire (Questionnaire II).
Research procedures are divided into three major stages. At the first stage, Reading Comprehension Test and Questionnaire I before RSI were conducted. Reading Comprehension Test is to understand the subjects’ language proficiency on the initial stage. Questionnaire I is employed to check out student’s reading strategy use before RSI; At the second stage, FD/FI learning styles’ instruction, RSI, and an analysis and practices of the GSAT/DRT reading comprehension tests in the JCEE from 1996 to 2011 were executed. FD/FI learning style instruction is to make students understand learning styles and be aware of their learning styles’ tendencies and possible limitations. RSI is to introduce global and local reading strategies to students. The analysis of the reading comprehension tests of the GSAT/DRT in the JCEE from 1996 to 2011 is to have students grasp the JCEE’s reading testing trends. The practices are to familiarize students with using these global and local reading strategies. At the third stage, Reading Comprehension Test after RSI, Questionnaire I after RSI, and Questionnaire II were carried out. Reading Comprehension Test after reading strategy instruction (RSI) is to examine the teaching effectiveness of RSI. Questionnaire I after RSI is to see if there is any significant difference in reading strategy use by the FD/FI groups before and after RSI. Questionnaire II is to draw participants’ feedbacks on RSI and seek pedagogical suggestions.
Major findings are summarized as follows.
(1)There were significant differences between the FD group and the FI group in the pre-test and post-test. The FD group performed better than the FI group both before and after RSI; however, the FI group improved better than the FD group after RSI.
(2)Different FD/FI learning styles affected the use of global and local reading strategies. After RSI, the FD and FI groups used the significantly different global/local reading strategies in the “identical” items [see Table 4.8 (A), p.81]. in addition, the FD and FI groups used the significantly different global/local reading strategies in the “different” items [see Table 4.8 (B)].
(3)Different FD/FI learning styles virtually affected learners’ performance in different reading question types. After RSI, the FD group performed better than the FI group in the global question types “style/tone,” “inference,” and in the local question type “bold word,” while the FI group performed better than the FD group in the global question types “the main idea,” “writing purpose,” and in the local question types “detail” and “reference.”
(4)Most students considered RSI useful, giving positive responses to this Reading Strategy Instruction (RSI) and learning style instruction. They were not so afraid of reading lengthy passages and became more confident. Half of the students agree with the effectiveness of RSI on writing, while another half of them held a conservative attitude towards that of RSI due to the upcoming General Scholastic Ability Test (GSAT). The most beneficial and difficult reading strategies were also discussed about students’ responses.
Based on the findings of this study, some implications were provided and several suggestions for future studies were offered at the end of this thesis.
參考文獻 Adams, W. R., & Jane, B. (1995). Reading beyond words. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Anderson, R. C., & Ausubel, D. A. (1965). Readings in the psychology of cognition. (Eds). New York: Holt, Rinerhart & Winston.
Brown, H.D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.).
NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Bull, K. S., Montgomery, D., & Kimball, S. L. (2000). Student learning styles and differences in instruction: Reading 9b student learning styles and differences. In K. S. Bull, D. L. Montgomery, and S. L. Kimball (Eds.).Quality University Instruction Online: An Advanced Teaching Effectiveness Training Program-An Instructional Hypertext. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University. Retrieved July 20, 2005, from http://home.okstate.edu/homepages.nsf/toc/EPSY5213Reading9b
Burton, R. D. (1978). Testing reading comprehension. English Teaching Forum, 16 (3), 17-19.
Carrell, P. L. (1984). The effects of rhetorical organization on ESL readers. TESOL Quarterly, 18(3), 441-469.
Carrell, P. L. (1988a). Some causes of text-boundedness and schema interference in ESL reading. In Carrel, P. L., Devine, J. and Esdey, D. (Eds.). Interactive approaches to second language reading. (pp.110-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carrell, P. L. (1988b). Interactive text processing: Implications for ESL/second language reading classrooms. In Carrel, P. L., Devine, J. and Esdey, D. (Eds.), Inter active approaches to second language reading. (pp.239-259). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.). U.S.: Heinle & Heinle.
Chau, S.T. (2006). The role of predictive words in reading comprehension instruction. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
Chen, Y. C. (2009). The effect of contextual inference strategy on vocabulary learning and reading comprehension in a junior high school in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
Chiang, H. H. (2004). The relationship between field sensitivity/field independence and the use of vocabulary learning strategies of EFL university students in Taiwan. Doctoral dissertation, College of Graduate Studies Texas A&M University-Kingsville. (pp.184-188). (UMI Number: 3143596)
Ellis, N. C., & Beaton, A. (1993). Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 43(4), 559-617.
Endwistle, D. N. (1988). Style of learning and teaching: An integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers, and lecturers (pp. 57-60). London: David Fulton Publishers.
Entwistle, D. N. (1988). Understanding classroom learning.London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Garger, S., & Guild, P. (1984). Learning styles: The crucial differences. Curriculum Review, 23, 9-12.
Goldstein, J. M., & Johnson, B. (2004). Voices and values: A reader for writers. Taipei: Bookman; Towensend Press.
Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psychological guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6 (1), 126-135.
Goodman, K. S. (1970). Reading: A psychological guessing game. In H. Singer and R.B. Ruddell (Eds.). Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 497-508). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
Halliday, M. A. K. Revised by Matthiessen, M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Janice A. Dole, Gerald G. Duffy, Laura R. Roehler and P. David Pearson. (1991). Moving from the old to the new-research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264.
Jonassen, D.H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Johnson, B. E. (1994). The reading edge: Thirteen ways to build reading comprehension (pp. 174-176).Taipei: Bookman.
Keefe, J. W. (1979). Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Guo, W. (2005). The effects of field independence/field dependence on reading comprehension test (pp. 41-47). Unpublished master’s thesis, Chang Chun University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences), China.
Li, A. H. (2003). Field independence and English and English reading ability. Unpublished master’s thesis, Hunan Normal University, China.
Liao, H. C. (2007). The Relationship between student-teacher cognitive styles and students’ English performance in junior high school. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
Lin, S. H. (2007). A case study of model-based writing instruction in senior high school English class. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
Lin, S. Y. (2007). The effects of reciprocal teaching on Taiwanese junior high school students’ English reading comprehension and metacognitive awareness. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
Lu, J. J. (2002). An Analysis of the reading comprehension test given in the English subject ability test in Taiwan and its pedagogical implications. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
McKay, R. (1987). Teaching the information-gathering skills. In Long M. H. and Richards, J. C. (Eds.). Methodology in TESOL: A book of reading (pp. 248-258). Boston, Mass: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
McCarhy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. London: Cambridge University Press.
Messick, S. (1976). Personality consistencies in cognition and creativity. In S. Messick (Ed.), Individuality in learning: Implications of cognitive style and creativity for human development (pp. 4-22). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Education Psychologist, 19 (2), 55-74.
Messick, S. (1994). The matter of style: Manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching. Educational Psychologist, 29(3), 121-136.
Milkulecky, B. S. (1990). A short course in teaching reading skills. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Milkulecky, B. S. & Jefferies, L. (1996). More reading power. NY: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Mo, C. C. (1987). A study of English reading comprehension and general guidelines for testing reading. Journal of National Chengchi University, 55, 173-206.
Mo, C. C. (1991). An extended topic chain: A paragraph development model for Chinese learners of English. Journal of National Chengchi University, 62, 285-309.
Musser, T. (n.d.). Individual differences: How field dependence-independence affects learners? Retrieved August 5, 2005, from http:// www.personal.psu.edu/txm4/paper1.html
Nuttall, C. (2005). Teaching reading skills in a foreign Language (2nd ed.). London: Heinemann.
Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching (1st ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing academic English (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Ltd, Inc, Longman.
Pask, G. (1998). Learning strategies teaching strategies, and conceptual learning style. In Schmeck, R.R. (ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles, 83-100. New York: Plenum Press.
Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behavior. London: David Fulton Publishers.
Saracho, O. N., & Spodek, B. (1981). Teachers’ cognitive styles and their educational implications. Educational Forum, 45 (2), 153-159.
Suskie, Linda. (2002). Theories and instruments for identifying student learning styles. Retrieved August 10, 2005, from http://wwwnew.towson.edu/iact/teaching/SuskieLearningStylesTheoriesandInstruments.doc
Town, D. A. (2003). Cognitive style and learning strategies. Retrieved August 2, 2005, from http://www.monografias.com/trabajos16/learning-styles/learning-styles.shtml
Wang, W. (2005). A study of the relationships of reading strategies to cognitive styles and reading proficiency (p. 60-70). Unpublished master’s thesis, Beijing Language and Culture University, China. Retrieved August 10, 2006, from http://cnki50.csis.com.tw/kns50/detail.aspx?QueryID=534&CurRec=3
Wang, Y. H. (2004). An investigation into vocabulary learning strategies used by senior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei
Warner, J. S., & Hilliard, J. (2001). Vision across the Americas: Short essays for composition (4th ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers.
Wei, Y. (2007). The effects of field-independence/dependence cognitive style on Chinese adult EFL reading comprehension abilities. Unpublished master’s thesis, Shanghai Normal University, China.
Whitefield (1995). Retrieved August 5, 2005, from http://cleo.murdoch.edu.au/asu/pubs/tlf/tlf95/whit271.html (dead link)
Willing, K. (1988). Learning styles in adult migrant education. NCRC Research: Adelaide.
Winkler, A. C. & Metherell, J. R. (2012). Writing the research paper: A handbook. (8th ed.). US: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Witkin, H.A. (1948). The effect of training and of structural aids on performance in three tests of space orientation. Washington, DC: Civil Aeronautics Administration, Division of Research.
Witkin, H.A., Philip K., Oltman, E. R., & Stephen A. K. (1971). EFT (Embedded Figures Test) Consulting Psychologists Press, Mind Garden. Inc.
Witkin, H.A., Moore. C. A., Goodenough. D. R., & Cox. P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications, Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64.
Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough. D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: essence and origins of field dependence and field independence. New York: International Universities Press.
Wyrick, J. (2005). Steps to writing well. (9th ed.). U.S.A.: Thomson Wadsworth.
Wyss, R. (2002). Field independent/dependent learning styles and L2 acquisition. Computer data on-line. The weekly column article 102. Retrieved June 28, 2005, from http://www.eltnewsletter.com/back/June2002/art1022002.htm
Young, D. J. (1993). Processing strategies of foreign language readers: Authentic and edited input. Foreign Language Annals-Winter 1993, 26(4), 451-468.
Yang, Y. C. (2005). The use of metadiscourse to teach high school students’ reading comprehension. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei
Yang, C. Y. (2007). An analysis of the English reading comprehension tests in the basic competence test and the instruction of the reading skills and strategies in class. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei
Yeh, I.C. (2006). The effects of reading strategies instruction on junior high school students’ reading comprehension in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei
王雪梅(2004)。<分析型認知風格對EFL閱讀能力的影響及教學對策>。曲阜師範大學外國語學院，《外國語言文學》，3期(總81期)，33-37頁。
李壽欣、宋慶文(1999)。<場依存—獨立性認知方式：理論演進及其應用研究>。《內蒙古師大學報》，第28卷，第2期，61頁。
張軍華(2006)。《不同風格大學生的英語閱讀策略及其干預研究》(未出版碩士論文)。南京師範大學教育科學學院，34頁。
曹逢甫(2004)。<利用閱讀教育突破在台灣教授英語的困境－語言規劃的觀點>。《英語教學》，28卷3期，1-15頁。台北：文鶴出版社。
曹逢甫(1992)。<目前閱讀教學的缺失及其改進之道>。《中華民國第八屆英語語文教學研討會英語文教學論文集》，291-300頁。台北：文鶴出版社。
莫建清(1990)。《最新GMAT文法、修辭、閱讀》，357-367頁。台北：中西留學書籍出版社。
莫建清、蔡慈娟、黃素端、洪宜紃、王麗絹、詹惠玲、許凱絨(2011)。《英語閱讀Easy Go-Developing English Reading Comprehension Skills Without Toil》。台北：三民書局。
楊懿麗(2006)。《現代英語文文法A Grammar of Contemporary English》。台北：國立編譯館。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英語教學碩士在職專班
94951013
100
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094951013
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 林啟一zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Lin, Chi Yeeen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 高永欽zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Kao, Yung Chingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 高永欽zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Kao, Yung Chingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2011en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Mar-2013 09:27:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Mar-2013 09:27:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Mar-2013 09:27:30 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0094951013en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/57078-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英語教學碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94951013zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 100zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究的目的是透過閱讀策略的教學，探討場地依賴/場地獨立學習風格與高中生閱讀策略使用的關係。研究對象是75位桃園縣二所高中三年級的學生。主要研究工具包括：用以測量學生學習風格的鑲嵌圖形測驗、了解起始點是否一致的全民英檢中級閱讀測驗及一份用於前、後測的閱讀理解測驗，以及一份用來瞭解學生在教學前後閱讀策略使用改變情形的閱讀策略問卷，最後進行一份教學後回饋問卷以了解學生對於此實驗教學的態度及觀感。
研究過程分為三個階段。第一階段：執行閱讀測驗前測及閱讀策略問卷前測。閱讀測驗前測是為了瞭解受試者起始點的語言程度;閱讀策略問卷前測則是為了瞭解不同學習風格的學生，在實驗教學前閱讀策略的使用情形；第二階段：實施場地依賴/場地獨立學習風格教學、閱讀策略教學、85年至100年歷屆學測及指考閱讀測驗題型分析與練習。場地依賴/場地獨立學習風格教學是為了介紹學習風格並讓學生瞭解自己學習風格的優勢與侷限；閱讀策略教學的目的是為了介紹整體型及局部型的閱讀策略，讓學生瞭解在實際的閱讀過程中有那些策略可供運用；85年至100年歷屆閱讀測驗題型分析是為了讓學生掌握閱讀測驗的考題趨勢，練習是要讓學生熟悉使用這些閱讀策略；第三階段：執行閱讀測驗後測、閱讀策略問卷後測及教學回饋問卷。閱讀測驗後測是為了瞭解實驗教學的成效;閱讀策略問卷後測是為了瞭解不同學習風格的學習者，在經過十八週的閱讀策略教學後，在整體型及局部型的那些閱讀策略使用上產生顯著的差異;教學回饋問卷則是為了進一步了解學生對於閱讀策略教學之觀感並尋求教學改進上的建議。
根據研究結果，主要的發現如下:
(1)此「閱讀策略教學」實驗，對場地依賴與場地獨立學習者的英語閱讀理解成績皆有正面影響；場地獨立學習者較場地依賴學習者進步尤為顯著。
(2)不同的學習風格確會造成學習者在整體型及局部型閱讀策略上使用的不同。經過「閱讀策略教學」後，[相同之處]－在閱讀策略的使用：注意引言段、主要論述段及結論段、注意第一段的每一句話（特別是主旨陳述）、注意最後一段的每一句話以瞭解篇章內容、注意作者如何撰寫第一段以引起讀者興趣及注意出現同位語之處，無論是場地依賴或場地獨立的學習者，都出現顯著性的閱讀策略使用改變。[相異之處]－場地依賴學習風格的學習者，在運用整體型閱讀策略：注意作者如何撰寫最後一段，及在運用局部型閱讀策略：注意有無表達比較或對照、注意有無表達原級、比較級或最高級、注意有無表達說明、解釋或換言之的閱讀策略使用上，表現不同於場地獨立學習風格的學習者；而場地獨立學習風格的學習者，在運用整體型閱讀策略：注意作者的寫作目的、注意表達作者風格、語調、態度、立場或觀點之處、注意推斷出文章可能的來源及出處，及在運用局部型閱讀策略：注意有無表達方位順序、注意有無表達讓步、注意出現特殊體例之處、注意出現倒裝句、注意出現加強語氣之處的閱讀策略使用，表現不同於場地依賴學習風格的學習者。
(3)不同的學習風格確會影響學習者在不同閱讀測驗題型上的表現。在「閱讀策略教學」後，場地依賴學習風格的學習者，在運用整體型閱讀策略：文章風格/作者態度、推論題型，以及在運用局部型閱讀策略：粗體單字題型上表現較佳；而場地獨立學習風格的學習者，則在運用整體型閱讀策略：主旨題、作者的寫作目的，以及在運用局部型閱讀策略的細節題及指涉題型上表現較佳。
(4)在接受「閱讀策略教學」後，無論是場地依賴或場地獨立，大部份的受試者都給予正面肯定的評價；對閱讀較有信心；對長篇文章不再那麼畏懼；對於場地依賴/場地獨立學習風格的教學普遍認同。然對於「閱讀策略教學」在英文寫作上的助益，贊成者與態度保留者幾占各半比率；對於學習風格的教學時機因大考在即，多持謹慎保留態度。受試者也表達了他們對於最有幫助及最困難的整體型及局部型閱讀策略的看法。
根據本研究的發現，研究者在文末提出數點教學建議及未來相關研究方向。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The present study aims to probe into the relationship between FD/FI learning styles and reading strategy use through RSI. Seventy five students of two 12th-grade senior high school classes in Tao-Yuan County were selected as one field dependent (FD) group and one field independent (FI) group. Five instruments were used: Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT), General English Proficiency Test (GEPT), a reading strategy questionnaire (Questionnaire I), a pre-and post-test, and a students’ responses questionnaire (Questionnaire II).
Research procedures are divided into three major stages. At the first stage, Reading Comprehension Test and Questionnaire I before RSI were conducted. Reading Comprehension Test is to understand the subjects’ language proficiency on the initial stage. Questionnaire I is employed to check out student’s reading strategy use before RSI; At the second stage, FD/FI learning styles’ instruction, RSI, and an analysis and practices of the GSAT/DRT reading comprehension tests in the JCEE from 1996 to 2011 were executed. FD/FI learning style instruction is to make students understand learning styles and be aware of their learning styles’ tendencies and possible limitations. RSI is to introduce global and local reading strategies to students. The analysis of the reading comprehension tests of the GSAT/DRT in the JCEE from 1996 to 2011 is to have students grasp the JCEE’s reading testing trends. The practices are to familiarize students with using these global and local reading strategies. At the third stage, Reading Comprehension Test after RSI, Questionnaire I after RSI, and Questionnaire II were carried out. Reading Comprehension Test after reading strategy instruction (RSI) is to examine the teaching effectiveness of RSI. Questionnaire I after RSI is to see if there is any significant difference in reading strategy use by the FD/FI groups before and after RSI. Questionnaire II is to draw participants’ feedbacks on RSI and seek pedagogical suggestions.
Major findings are summarized as follows.
(1)There were significant differences between the FD group and the FI group in the pre-test and post-test. The FD group performed better than the FI group both before and after RSI; however, the FI group improved better than the FD group after RSI.
(2)Different FD/FI learning styles affected the use of global and local reading strategies. After RSI, the FD and FI groups used the significantly different global/local reading strategies in the “identical” items [see Table 4.8 (A), p.81]. in addition, the FD and FI groups used the significantly different global/local reading strategies in the “different” items [see Table 4.8 (B)].
(3)Different FD/FI learning styles virtually affected learners’ performance in different reading question types. After RSI, the FD group performed better than the FI group in the global question types “style/tone,” “inference,” and in the local question type “bold word,” while the FI group performed better than the FD group in the global question types “the main idea,” “writing purpose,” and in the local question types “detail” and “reference.”
(4)Most students considered RSI useful, giving positive responses to this Reading Strategy Instruction (RSI) and learning style instruction. They were not so afraid of reading lengthy passages and became more confident. Half of the students agree with the effectiveness of RSI on writing, while another half of them held a conservative attitude towards that of RSI due to the upcoming General Scholastic Ability Test (GSAT). The most beneficial and difficult reading strategies were also discussed about students’ responses.
Based on the findings of this study, some implications were provided and several suggestions for future studies were offered at the end of this thesis.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Dedication i
Acknowledgements ii
Table of Contents iii
List of Tables viii
List of Chart xi
Chinese Abstract xii
English Abstract xiv

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Purpose of the Study 4
1.3 Significance of the Study 4
1.4 Organization of the Thesis 5

CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 7
2.1 FD/FI Learning Styles and Left/Right Brain Functioning 7
2.1.1 The Origin of FD and FI 7
2.1.2 FD/FI Learners’ Learning Styles 10
2.1.3 Left/Right Brain Functioning 17
2.2 Global and Local Reading Strategies 19
2.3 Types of Reading Comprehension Questions 41
2.4 FD/FI learners’ Learning Styles and the Use of English Reading Strategies 43
2.5 Research Questions 46

CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 49
3.1 Participants 49
3.2 Instruments 50
3.2.1 Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) 50
3.2.2 General English Proficiency Test (GEPT) 53
3.2.3 Reading Strategy Questionnaire before & after RSI (Questionnaire I) 54
3.2.4 Reading Comprehension Test before & after RSI 55
3.2.5 An Analysis of Question Types of Reading Comprehension Test 1996~2011 56
3.2.6 Students’ Responses to RSI (Questionnaire II) 63
3.3 Procedure 63
3.3.1 Pilot Study 65
3.3.2 Main Study 66
3.4 Data Analysis 70

CHAPTER 4 RESULTS 73
4.1 Research Question 1: How do FD/FI Learners Perform in English Reading Comprehension before and after Instruction? And Which Group of Learner Benefit More from the Reading Strategy Instruction, FD Learners, or FI Learners? 73
4.1.1 How do FD/FI Learners Perform in English Reading Comprehension before and after Instruction? 73
4.1.2 Which Group of Learner Benefit More from the Reading Strategy Instruction, FD Learners, or FI Learners? 74
A Summary of Responses to Research Question 1 74
4.2 Research Question 2: How frequently do FD/FI Learners use different reading strategies before and after instruction? 75
4.2.1 Frequency of the FD group’s Global Reading Strategy Use before & after RSI 75
4.2.2 Frequency of the FD group’s Local Reading Strategy Use before & after RSI 77
4.2.3 Frequency of the FI group’s Global Reading Strategy Use before & after RSI 79
4.2.4 Frequency of the FI group’s Local Reading Strategy Use before & after RSI 80
A Summary of Responses to Research Question 2 83
4.3 Research Question 3: How do FD/FI Learners perform in reading comprehension question types before and after instruction: the main idea, the best title, possible source, organization, style/tone, writing purpose, conclusion, inference, specific detail, bold word and reference? 88
4.3.1 The FD Group’s Performance in Question Types before RSI 89
4.3.2 The FI Group’s Performance in Question Types before RSI 90
4.3.3 The FD Group’s Performance in Question Types after RSI 93
4.3.4 The FI Group’s Performance in Question Types after RSI 94
A Summary of Responses to Research Question 3 97
4.4 Research Question 4: How well do FD/FI Learners perceive the effectiveness of the reading strategy instruction? 98
4.4.1 Students’ Responses to the Effects of RSI on Reading Strategies Use 99
4.4.2 Students’ Responses to the Effects of RSI on Writing 99
4.4.3 Students’ Responses to the Future Classes on RSI 100
4.4.4 Students’ Responses to the Most Beneficial Global Reading Strategies in RSI 101
4.4.5 Students’ Responses to the Most Beneficial Local Reading Strategies in RSI 102
4.4.6 Students’ Responses to the Most Difficult Global Reading Strategies in RSI 105
4.4.7 Students’ Responses to the Most Difficult Local Reading Strategies in RSI 106
4.4.8 Students’ Responses to FD/FI Learning Style Instruction in RSI 108
A Summary of Responses to Research Question 4 110
A Grand Summary of the Description of Each Reading Strategy Used by FD/FI 113

CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION 125
5.1 Discussion of the Major Findings 125
5.1.1 The Effects of RSI on Students’ Reading Comprehension 125
5.1.2 The Effects of RSI on FD/FI Students’ Reading Strategy Use before and after RSI 128
5.1.3 Students’ Performance in Each Question Type 131
5.1.4 Students’ Feedbacks on the Effect of RSI 133
5.2 Pedagogical Implications 143
5.3 Limitations of this Study and Suggestions for Future Research 144

REFERENCES 147

APPENDIXES
A. A Statistics on the Text and Word Number in Reading Comprehension Test (JCEE, RE, GSAT, and DRT) 1996 ~ 2011 155
B. Questionnaire I－Reading Strategies Questionnaire (English Version) 158
C. Cooperative Teaching Plan 162
D. Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) 164
E. The Results of General English Proficiency Test (GEPT) 165
F. Questionnaire I－Reading Strategies Questionnaire (Chinese Version) 166
G. Cronbach’s Alpha 169
H. Reading Comprehension Test (Pre-test & Post-test) 170
I. Question Types of Reading Comprehension Tests1996 ~ 2011 177
J. Questionnaire II－Responses to RSI and FD/FI Learning Style Instruction 191		zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094951013en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學習風格zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 場地獨立zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 場地依賴zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 閱讀策略zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) learningen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) FDen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) FIen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) stylereading strategiesen_US
dc.title (題名) 場地獨立/場地依賴學習風格與高中生英語閱讀策略運用之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A study of FI /FD learners’ learning styles and the use of English reading strategies in EFL senior high schoolen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Adams, W. R., & Jane, B. (1995). Reading beyond words. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Anderson, R. C., & Ausubel, D. A. (1965). Readings in the psychology of cognition. (Eds). New York: Holt, Rinerhart & Winston.
Brown, H.D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.).
NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Bull, K. S., Montgomery, D., & Kimball, S. L. (2000). Student learning styles and differences in instruction: Reading 9b student learning styles and differences. In K. S. Bull, D. L. Montgomery, and S. L. Kimball (Eds.).Quality University Instruction Online: An Advanced Teaching Effectiveness Training Program-An Instructional Hypertext. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University. Retrieved July 20, 2005, from http://home.okstate.edu/homepages.nsf/toc/EPSY5213Reading9b
Burton, R. D. (1978). Testing reading comprehension. English Teaching Forum, 16 (3), 17-19.
Carrell, P. L. (1984). The effects of rhetorical organization on ESL readers. TESOL Quarterly, 18(3), 441-469.
Carrell, P. L. (1988a). Some causes of text-boundedness and schema interference in ESL reading. In Carrel, P. L., Devine, J. and Esdey, D. (Eds.). Interactive approaches to second language reading. (pp.110-113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carrell, P. L. (1988b). Interactive text processing: Implications for ESL/second language reading classrooms. In Carrel, P. L., Devine, J. and Esdey, D. (Eds.), Inter active approaches to second language reading. (pp.239-259). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.). U.S.: Heinle & Heinle.
Chau, S.T. (2006). The role of predictive words in reading comprehension instruction. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
Chen, Y. C. (2009). The effect of contextual inference strategy on vocabulary learning and reading comprehension in a junior high school in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
Chiang, H. H. (2004). The relationship between field sensitivity/field independence and the use of vocabulary learning strategies of EFL university students in Taiwan. Doctoral dissertation, College of Graduate Studies Texas A&M University-Kingsville. (pp.184-188). (UMI Number: 3143596)
Ellis, N. C., & Beaton, A. (1993). Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 43(4), 559-617.
Endwistle, D. N. (1988). Style of learning and teaching: An integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers, and lecturers (pp. 57-60). London: David Fulton Publishers.
Entwistle, D. N. (1988). Understanding classroom learning.London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Garger, S., & Guild, P. (1984). Learning styles: The crucial differences. Curriculum Review, 23, 9-12.
Goldstein, J. M., & Johnson, B. (2004). Voices and values: A reader for writers. Taipei: Bookman; Towensend Press.
Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psychological guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6 (1), 126-135.
Goodman, K. S. (1970). Reading: A psychological guessing game. In H. Singer and R.B. Ruddell (Eds.). Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 497-508). Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
Halliday, M. A. K. Revised by Matthiessen, M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Janice A. Dole, Gerald G. Duffy, Laura R. Roehler and P. David Pearson. (1991). Moving from the old to the new-research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264.
Jonassen, D.H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Johnson, B. E. (1994). The reading edge: Thirteen ways to build reading comprehension (pp. 174-176).Taipei: Bookman.
Keefe, J. W. (1979). Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Guo, W. (2005). The effects of field independence/field dependence on reading comprehension test (pp. 41-47). Unpublished master’s thesis, Chang Chun University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences), China.
Li, A. H. (2003). Field independence and English and English reading ability. Unpublished master’s thesis, Hunan Normal University, China.
Liao, H. C. (2007). The Relationship between student-teacher cognitive styles and students’ English performance in junior high school. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
Lin, S. H. (2007). A case study of model-based writing instruction in senior high school English class. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
Lin, S. Y. (2007). The effects of reciprocal teaching on Taiwanese junior high school students’ English reading comprehension and metacognitive awareness. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
Lu, J. J. (2002). An Analysis of the reading comprehension test given in the English subject ability test in Taiwan and its pedagogical implications. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei.
McKay, R. (1987). Teaching the information-gathering skills. In Long M. H. and Richards, J. C. (Eds.). Methodology in TESOL: A book of reading (pp. 248-258). Boston, Mass: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
McCarhy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. London: Cambridge University Press.
Messick, S. (1976). Personality consistencies in cognition and creativity. In S. Messick (Ed.), Individuality in learning: Implications of cognitive style and creativity for human development (pp. 4-22). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Education Psychologist, 19 (2), 55-74.
Messick, S. (1994). The matter of style: Manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching. Educational Psychologist, 29(3), 121-136.
Milkulecky, B. S. (1990). A short course in teaching reading skills. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Milkulecky, B. S. & Jefferies, L. (1996). More reading power. NY: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Mo, C. C. (1987). A study of English reading comprehension and general guidelines for testing reading. Journal of National Chengchi University, 55, 173-206.
Mo, C. C. (1991). An extended topic chain: A paragraph development model for Chinese learners of English. Journal of National Chengchi University, 62, 285-309.
Musser, T. (n.d.). Individual differences: How field dependence-independence affects learners? Retrieved August 5, 2005, from http:// www.personal.psu.edu/txm4/paper1.html
Nuttall, C. (2005). Teaching reading skills in a foreign Language (2nd ed.). London: Heinemann.
Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching (1st ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing academic English (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Ltd, Inc, Longman.
Pask, G. (1998). Learning strategies teaching strategies, and conceptual learning style. In Schmeck, R.R. (ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles, 83-100. New York: Plenum Press.
Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behavior. London: David Fulton Publishers.
Saracho, O. N., & Spodek, B. (1981). Teachers’ cognitive styles and their educational implications. Educational Forum, 45 (2), 153-159.
Suskie, Linda. (2002). Theories and instruments for identifying student learning styles. Retrieved August 10, 2005, from http://wwwnew.towson.edu/iact/teaching/SuskieLearningStylesTheoriesandInstruments.doc
Town, D. A. (2003). Cognitive style and learning strategies. Retrieved August 2, 2005, from http://www.monografias.com/trabajos16/learning-styles/learning-styles.shtml
Wang, W. (2005). A study of the relationships of reading strategies to cognitive styles and reading proficiency (p. 60-70). Unpublished master’s thesis, Beijing Language and Culture University, China. Retrieved August 10, 2006, from http://cnki50.csis.com.tw/kns50/detail.aspx?QueryID=534&CurRec=3
Wang, Y. H. (2004). An investigation into vocabulary learning strategies used by senior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei
Warner, J. S., & Hilliard, J. (2001). Vision across the Americas: Short essays for composition (4th ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers.
Wei, Y. (2007). The effects of field-independence/dependence cognitive style on Chinese adult EFL reading comprehension abilities. Unpublished master’s thesis, Shanghai Normal University, China.
Whitefield (1995). Retrieved August 5, 2005, from http://cleo.murdoch.edu.au/asu/pubs/tlf/tlf95/whit271.html (dead link)
Willing, K. (1988). Learning styles in adult migrant education. NCRC Research: Adelaide.
Winkler, A. C. & Metherell, J. R. (2012). Writing the research paper: A handbook. (8th ed.). US: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Witkin, H.A. (1948). The effect of training and of structural aids on performance in three tests of space orientation. Washington, DC: Civil Aeronautics Administration, Division of Research.
Witkin, H.A., Philip K., Oltman, E. R., & Stephen A. K. (1971). EFT (Embedded Figures Test) Consulting Psychologists Press, Mind Garden. Inc.
Witkin, H.A., Moore. C. A., Goodenough. D. R., & Cox. P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications, Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64.
Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough. D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: essence and origins of field dependence and field independence. New York: International Universities Press.
Wyrick, J. (2005). Steps to writing well. (9th ed.). U.S.A.: Thomson Wadsworth.
Wyss, R. (2002). Field independent/dependent learning styles and L2 acquisition. Computer data on-line. The weekly column article 102. Retrieved June 28, 2005, from http://www.eltnewsletter.com/back/June2002/art1022002.htm
Young, D. J. (1993). Processing strategies of foreign language readers: Authentic and edited input. Foreign Language Annals-Winter 1993, 26(4), 451-468.
Yang, Y. C. (2005). The use of metadiscourse to teach high school students’ reading comprehension. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei
Yang, C. Y. (2007). An analysis of the English reading comprehension tests in the basic competence test and the instruction of the reading skills and strategies in class. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei
Yeh, I.C. (2006). The effects of reading strategies instruction on junior high school students’ reading comprehension in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei
王雪梅(2004)。<分析型認知風格對EFL閱讀能力的影響及教學對策>。曲阜師範大學外國語學院，《外國語言文學》，3期(總81期)，33-37頁。
李壽欣、宋慶文(1999)。<場依存—獨立性認知方式：理論演進及其應用研究>。《內蒙古師大學報》，第28卷，第2期，61頁。
張軍華(2006)。《不同風格大學生的英語閱讀策略及其干預研究》(未出版碩士論文)。南京師範大學教育科學學院，34頁。
曹逢甫(2004)。<利用閱讀教育突破在台灣教授英語的困境－語言規劃的觀點>。《英語教學》，28卷3期，1-15頁。台北：文鶴出版社。
曹逢甫(1992)。<目前閱讀教學的缺失及其改進之道>。《中華民國第八屆英語語文教學研討會英語文教學論文集》，291-300頁。台北：文鶴出版社。
莫建清(1990)。《最新GMAT文法、修辭、閱讀》，357-367頁。台北：中西留學書籍出版社。
莫建清、蔡慈娟、黃素端、洪宜紃、王麗絹、詹惠玲、許凱絨(2011)。《英語閱讀Easy Go-Developing English Reading Comprehension Skills Without Toil》。台北：三民書局。
楊懿麗(2006)。《現代英語文文法A Grammar of Contemporary English》。台北：國立編譯館。		zh_TW