學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 An Analysis and Comparison of Scientometric Data between Journals of Physics, Chemistry and Engineering
作者 Tsay, Ming-Yueh
蔡明月
貢獻者 政大圖檔所
日期 2008-10
上傳時間 28-Mar-2013 15:44:15 (UTC+8)
摘要 By employing the Pearson correlation, Fisher-and t-tests, the present study analyzes and compares scientometric data including number of source items, number of citations, impact factor, immediacy index, citing half-life and cited half-life, for essential journals in physics, chemistry and engineering, from SCI JCR on the Web 2002. The results of the study reveal that for all the scientometric indicators, except the cited half-life, there is no significant mean difference between physics and chemistry subjects indicating similar citation behavior among the scientists. There is no significant mean difference in the citing half-life among the three subjects. Significant mean difference is generally observed for most of the scientometric indicators between engineering and physics (or chemistry) demonstrating the difference in citation behavior among engineering researchers and scientists in physics or chemistry. Significant correlations among number of source items, number of citations, impact factor, and immediacy index and between cited half-life and citing half-life generally prevail for each of the three subjects. On the contrary, in general, there is no significant correlation between the cited half-life and other scientometric indicators. The three subjects present the same strength of the correlations between number of source items and number of citations, between number of citations and impact factor, and between cited half-life and citing half-life.
關聯 Scientometrics, 78(2), 279-293
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1996-1
dc.contributor 政大圖檔所en
dc.creator (作者) Tsay, Ming-Yuehen
dc.creator (作者) 蔡明月zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2008-10-
dc.date.accessioned 28-Mar-2013 15:44:15 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 28-Mar-2013 15:44:15 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 28-Mar-2013 15:44:15 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/57533-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) By employing the Pearson correlation, Fisher-and t-tests, the present study analyzes and compares scientometric data including number of source items, number of citations, impact factor, immediacy index, citing half-life and cited half-life, for essential journals in physics, chemistry and engineering, from SCI JCR on the Web 2002. The results of the study reveal that for all the scientometric indicators, except the cited half-life, there is no significant mean difference between physics and chemistry subjects indicating similar citation behavior among the scientists. There is no significant mean difference in the citing half-life among the three subjects. Significant mean difference is generally observed for most of the scientometric indicators between engineering and physics (or chemistry) demonstrating the difference in citation behavior among engineering researchers and scientists in physics or chemistry. Significant correlations among number of source items, number of citations, impact factor, and immediacy index and between cited half-life and citing half-life generally prevail for each of the three subjects. On the contrary, in general, there is no significant correlation between the cited half-life and other scientometric indicators. The three subjects present the same strength of the correlations between number of source items and number of citations, between number of citations and impact factor, and between cited half-life and citing half-life.en
dc.format.extent 193568 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language zh_TWen
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) Scientometrics, 78(2), 279-293en
dc.title (題名) An Analysis and Comparison of Scientometric Data between Journals of Physics, Chemistry and Engineeringen
dc.type (資料類型) articleen
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1007/s11192-007-1996-1en_US
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1996-1en_US