學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 布丹主權概念發展之研究
On the Development of Jean Bodin’s Idea of Sovereignty作者 蔣馥朵 貢獻者 蕭高彥
蔣馥朵關鍵詞 布丹
主權
憲政主義
絕對主義
立法權日期 2012 上傳時間 1-四月-2013 14:40:36 (UTC+8) 摘要 《邦國論六卷》卷帙浩瀚，是布丹留名於政治思想史之作，其中主權概念的闡述更對現代國家理論建構不可或缺。而布丹在十年前於《理解歷史的簡易方法》中也已經簡要討論過主權概念。兩部著作間的理論連貫性引起某些討論；部分學者認為兩書間理路一致，細節差異微不足道，但也有學者認為《理解歷史的簡易方法》屬於十六世紀憲政主義傳統，《邦國論六卷》中的絕對主義為一理論斷裂的結果。然而檢視十六世紀憲政思想著作後可以發現，其脈絡下的君主，不但受到神法與自然法的限制，更必須遵守政治共同體內之既有法律，無法完全掌握立法權。另一方面，布丹早期雖然認為君主的加冕誓詞，令王國既有法律成為一實在限制，但卻也同意身為立法者的主權君主地位必然凌駕於法律之上，可以視情形廢除、修訂，甚至是頒佈新法。布丹在《邦國論六卷》中，則以釐清法律與契約差異的方式來解決這個理論矛盾，並呈現出與憲政精神截然不同的主權理論：主權者雖然仍要受到自然法、神法以及規範王位傳承的根本法等限制，但以上約束全不構成臣民挑戰君主的理由。布丹的絕對主義傾向，與其說是前後期理論斷裂，毋寧是內部邏輯趨於一致的結果。 參考文獻 一、布丹著作\n\n1966 Method for the Easy Comprehension of History, translated by Beatrice Reynolds. New York: Octagon.\n1988 Les Six Livres de la République, edited by Christiane Frémont, Marie-Dominique Couzinet, Henri Rochais, Paris: Fayard.\n1992 On Sovereignty: Four chapters from the Six Books of the Commonwealth, edited and translated by Julian H. Franklin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\n2008 《主權論》讓 • 博丹著，朱利安 • H. 富蘭克林編，李衛海，錢俊文譯，北京：北京大學出版社。\n\n二、西文書目\n\nAllen\n1967 “Jean Bodin,” The Social and Political Ideas of Some Great Thinkers of \nthe Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, ed. F. J. C. Hearnshaw, New York: Barnes & Noble.\nArendt, Hannah\n 1990 “Philosophy and Politics,” Social Research 57, 1.\nAristotle\n1984 The Politics, translated by Carnes Lord. Chicago: University of \nChicago Press.\nBeaud, Olivier\n1994 La Puissance de L’Etat, Paris : Presses universitaires de France.\nBerns, Thomas\n 2000 “Bodin: La Souveraineté Saisie par Ses Marques,” Bibliothèque \nd`Humanisme et Renaissance, T. 62, No. 3 (2000), pp. 611-623.\nChurch, William Farr\n1941 Constitutional Thought in Sixteenth-Century France: A Study in the \nEvolution of Ideas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.\nEulau, Heinz H. F.\n1942 “The Depersonalization of the Concept of Sovereignty,” The Journal of \nPolitics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 3-19.\nFranklin, Julian\n1969 Constitutionalism and Resistance in the Sixteenth Century Three \nTreatises by Hotman, Beza, & Mornay Julian H. Franklin trans. & ed., New York : Pegasus.\n1973 Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory. New York: Cambridge \nUniversity Press.\n2001 “The Question of Sovereignty in Bodin’s Account of Sovereignty, in \nAnthony T Grafton & J. H. M. ed., Historians and Ideologues, Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp.40-48.\nGilmore, Myron Piper\n1941 Arguments from Roman Law in Political Thought 1200-1600. New York: \nRussell& Russell.\nHolmes, Stephen\n 1995 “The Constitution of Sovereignty in Jean Bodin,” Passions and \nConstraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.\nHolt, Mack P.\n1995 The French Wars of Religion, 1562-1629. New York: Cambridge University Press.\nHutton, Ronald\n2007 The Druids. London: Hambledon Continuum.\nJacobsen, Mogens Chrom\n2000 Jean Bodin et le dilemme de la philosophie politique moderne. \nKøbenhavn : Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen.\nKeohane, Nannerl O.\n1980 Philosophy and the state in France : the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.\nKing, Preston\n1973 The Ideology of Order: A Comparative Analysis of Jean Bodin and \nThomas Hobbes. London: George Allen & Unwin ltd.\nLewis, J. U.\n1968 “Jean Bodin’s ‘Logic if Sovereignty’” , Political Studies, 16,pp. 206-22.\nMesnard, Pierre\n1977 L’essor de la Philosophie Politique au XVIe Siècle. Paris: Vrin.\nMousnier, Roland\n1979 The Institutions of France under the Absolute Monarchy, 1598-1789. \nChicago: The University of Chicago.\nNeumann, Franz\n1986 The Rule of Law: Political Theory and the Legal System in Modern \nSociety. Heidelberg: Berg Publisher. \nReynolds, Beatrice\n 1931 Proponents of Limited Monarchy in Sixteenth Century France: Francis \nHotman and Jean Bodin, New York: Columbia University Press.\nSchmitt, Carl\n1985 Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. \nChicago: University of Chicago Press.\nShepard, Max Adams\n1930 “Sovereignty at the Crossroads: A Study of Bodin,” Political Science \nQuarterly, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 580-603.\nSeyssel, Claude de\n1981 The Monarchy of France. Translated by J. H. Hexter. New Haven and \nLondon: Yale University Press.\nSkinner, Quentin\n2002 Visions of Politics: Volume II: Renaissance Virtues, Cambridge: \nCambridge University Press.\nSpitz, Jean-Fabien\n1998 Bodin et la souveraineté. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.\nStrauss, Leo\n1984 The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis, Chicago: \nUniversity of Chicago Press.\nOwen Ulph, \n1947, “Jean Bodin and the Estates-General of 1576,” Jean Bodin, ed. Julian \nFranklin, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.\nVeogelin, Eric\n1998 History of Political Ideas v. 5 Religion and the Rise of modernity in The \nCollected Works of Eric Veogelin, edited by James L. Wiser. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press\n \n三、中文書目\n\n史金納 (Quentin Skinner)\n 2004 《現代政治思想的基礎 (卷二)：宗教改革》，台北：左岸文化。\n施密特 (Carl Schmitt)\n2004 《憲法學說》，劉楓譯，台北：聯經。\n2005 《政治的概念》，劉宗坤譯，上海：上海人民。\n2006 《論斷與概念》，朱雁冰譯，上海：上海人民。\n陳秀鳳\n2005 政權“神聖化”?－以法蘭克國王祝聖典禮為中心的探討，新史學16卷\n4期。\n2007a 神聖性王權“世俗化”－中世紀晚期法學思想與法蘭西王權關係的探\n討，新史學18卷3期。\n2007b “法蘭西貴族”團與法蘭西王權關係的探討 臺灣師大歷史學報 第38\n期。\n薩孟武\n1993 《西洋政治思想史》，台北：三民書局。\n賽班\n1991《西洋政治思想史》，台北：桂冠。 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
政治研究所
96252015
101資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096252015 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 蕭高彥 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) 蔣馥朵 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) 蔣馥朵 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2012 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-四月-2013 14:40:36 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-四月-2013 14:40:36 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-四月-2013 14:40:36 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0096252015 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=65184 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 政治研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 96252015 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 101 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 《邦國論六卷》卷帙浩瀚，是布丹留名於政治思想史之作，其中主權概念的闡述更對現代國家理論建構不可或缺。而布丹在十年前於《理解歷史的簡易方法》中也已經簡要討論過主權概念。兩部著作間的理論連貫性引起某些討論；部分學者認為兩書間理路一致，細節差異微不足道，但也有學者認為《理解歷史的簡易方法》屬於十六世紀憲政主義傳統，《邦國論六卷》中的絕對主義為一理論斷裂的結果。然而檢視十六世紀憲政思想著作後可以發現，其脈絡下的君主，不但受到神法與自然法的限制，更必須遵守政治共同體內之既有法律，無法完全掌握立法權。另一方面，布丹早期雖然認為君主的加冕誓詞，令王國既有法律成為一實在限制，但卻也同意身為立法者的主權君主地位必然凌駕於法律之上，可以視情形廢除、修訂，甚至是頒佈新法。布丹在《邦國論六卷》中，則以釐清法律與契約差異的方式來解決這個理論矛盾，並呈現出與憲政精神截然不同的主權理論：主權者雖然仍要受到自然法、神法以及規範王位傳承的根本法等限制，但以上約束全不構成臣民挑戰君主的理由。布丹的絕對主義傾向，與其說是前後期理論斷裂，毋寧是內部邏輯趨於一致的結果。 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 緒論-------------------------------------------------------1 \n\n第一節 前言------------------------------------------------1 \n第二節 布丹著作與生平簡介-------------------------------------2\n第三節 問題意識與文獻檢閱-------------------------------------5\n第四節 章節安排--------------------------------------------10\n\n第一章 十六世紀法國憲政思想----------------------------------12\n \n第一節 《法蘭西君主國》---------------------------------------12\n第二節 《法蘭克高盧》----------------------------------------21\n \n第二章 《理解歷史的簡易方法》與主權理論-------------------------31\n\n第一節 政治共同體之要素--------------------------------------32\n第二節 國家體制分類-----------------------------------------36\n第三節 主權理論--------------------------------------------44\n\n第三章 《邦國論六卷》與主權理論-------------------------------53\n\n第一節 主權理論--------------------------------------------53\n第二節 主權者與法律-----------------------------------------60\n第三節 主權者與政治共同體------------------------------------68\n\n\n結論------------------------------------------------------84\n\n參考書目---------------------------------------------------89 zh_TW dc.language.iso en_US - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096252015 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 布丹 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 主權 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 憲政主義 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 絕對主義 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 立法權 zh_TW dc.title (題名) 布丹主權概念發展之研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) On the Development of Jean Bodin’s Idea of Sovereignty en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、布丹著作\n\n1966 Method for the Easy Comprehension of History, translated by Beatrice Reynolds. New York: Octagon.\n1988 Les Six Livres de la République, edited by Christiane Frémont, Marie-Dominique Couzinet, Henri Rochais, Paris: Fayard.\n1992 On Sovereignty: Four chapters from the Six Books of the Commonwealth, edited and translated by Julian H. Franklin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\n2008 《主權論》讓 • 博丹著，朱利安 • H. 富蘭克林編，李衛海，錢俊文譯，北京：北京大學出版社。\n\n二、西文書目\n\nAllen\n1967 “Jean Bodin,” The Social and Political Ideas of Some Great Thinkers of \nthe Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, ed. F. J. C. Hearnshaw, New York: Barnes & Noble.\nArendt, Hannah\n 1990 “Philosophy and Politics,” Social Research 57, 1.\nAristotle\n1984 The Politics, translated by Carnes Lord. Chicago: University of \nChicago Press.\nBeaud, Olivier\n1994 La Puissance de L’Etat, Paris : Presses universitaires de France.\nBerns, Thomas\n 2000 “Bodin: La Souveraineté Saisie par Ses Marques,” Bibliothèque \nd`Humanisme et Renaissance, T. 62, No. 3 (2000), pp. 611-623.\nChurch, William Farr\n1941 Constitutional Thought in Sixteenth-Century France: A Study in the \nEvolution of Ideas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.\nEulau, Heinz H. F.\n1942 “The Depersonalization of the Concept of Sovereignty,” The Journal of \nPolitics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 3-19.\nFranklin, Julian\n1969 Constitutionalism and Resistance in the Sixteenth Century Three \nTreatises by Hotman, Beza, & Mornay Julian H. Franklin trans. & ed., New York : Pegasus.\n1973 Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory. New York: Cambridge \nUniversity Press.\n2001 “The Question of Sovereignty in Bodin’s Account of Sovereignty, in \nAnthony T Grafton & J. H. M. ed., Historians and Ideologues, Rochester: University of Rochester Press, pp.40-48.\nGilmore, Myron Piper\n1941 Arguments from Roman Law in Political Thought 1200-1600. New York: \nRussell& Russell.\nHolmes, Stephen\n 1995 “The Constitution of Sovereignty in Jean Bodin,” Passions and \nConstraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.\nHolt, Mack P.\n1995 The French Wars of Religion, 1562-1629. New York: Cambridge University Press.\nHutton, Ronald\n2007 The Druids. London: Hambledon Continuum.\nJacobsen, Mogens Chrom\n2000 Jean Bodin et le dilemme de la philosophie politique moderne. \nKøbenhavn : Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen.\nKeohane, Nannerl O.\n1980 Philosophy and the state in France : the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.\nKing, Preston\n1973 The Ideology of Order: A Comparative Analysis of Jean Bodin and \nThomas Hobbes. London: George Allen & Unwin ltd.\nLewis, J. U.\n1968 “Jean Bodin’s ‘Logic if Sovereignty’” , Political Studies, 16,pp. 206-22.\nMesnard, Pierre\n1977 L’essor de la Philosophie Politique au XVIe Siècle. Paris: Vrin.\nMousnier, Roland\n1979 The Institutions of France under the Absolute Monarchy, 1598-1789. \nChicago: The University of Chicago.\nNeumann, Franz\n1986 The Rule of Law: Political Theory and the Legal System in Modern \nSociety. Heidelberg: Berg Publisher. \nReynolds, Beatrice\n 1931 Proponents of Limited Monarchy in Sixteenth Century France: Francis \nHotman and Jean Bodin, New York: Columbia University Press.\nSchmitt, Carl\n1985 Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. \nChicago: University of Chicago Press.\nShepard, Max Adams\n1930 “Sovereignty at the Crossroads: A Study of Bodin,” Political Science \nQuarterly, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 580-603.\nSeyssel, Claude de\n1981 The Monarchy of France. Translated by J. H. Hexter. New Haven and \nLondon: Yale University Press.\nSkinner, Quentin\n2002 Visions of Politics: Volume II: Renaissance Virtues, Cambridge: \nCambridge University Press.\nSpitz, Jean-Fabien\n1998 Bodin et la souveraineté. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.\nStrauss, Leo\n1984 The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis, Chicago: \nUniversity of Chicago Press.\nOwen Ulph, \n1947, “Jean Bodin and the Estates-General of 1576,” Jean Bodin, ed. Julian \nFranklin, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.\nVeogelin, Eric\n1998 History of Political Ideas v. 5 Religion and the Rise of modernity in The \nCollected Works of Eric Veogelin, edited by James L. Wiser. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press\n \n三、中文書目\n\n史金納 (Quentin Skinner)\n 2004 《現代政治思想的基礎 (卷二)：宗教改革》，台北：左岸文化。\n施密特 (Carl Schmitt)\n2004 《憲法學說》，劉楓譯，台北：聯經。\n2005 《政治的概念》，劉宗坤譯，上海：上海人民。\n2006 《論斷與概念》，朱雁冰譯，上海：上海人民。\n陳秀鳳\n2005 政權“神聖化”?－以法蘭克國王祝聖典禮為中心的探討，新史學16卷\n4期。\n2007a 神聖性王權“世俗化”－中世紀晚期法學思想與法蘭西王權關係的探\n討，新史學18卷3期。\n2007b “法蘭西貴族”團與法蘭西王權關係的探討 臺灣師大歷史學報 第38\n期。\n薩孟武\n1993 《西洋政治思想史》，台北：三民書局。\n賽班\n1991《西洋政治思想史》，台北：桂冠。 zh_TW
